DOCSLIB.ORG

The Kotayk Survey Project. Preliminary Report on 2015 Fieldwork Activities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Kotayk Survey Project. Preliminary Report on 2015 Fieldwork Activities Annali, Sezione orientale 77 (2017) 294–317 brill.com/aioo The Kotayk Survey Project. Preliminary Report on 2015 Fieldwork Activities Roberto Dan International Association of Mediterranean and Oriental Studies (ISMEO) [email protected] Artur Petrosyan Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the National Academy of Sciences of the Armenian Republic (IAE NAS RA) [email protected] Abstract The Kotayk Survey Project (KSP) started in the summer of 2013. This is a joint Armenian—Italian project involving the study of the upper Hrazdan river valley, located in the northern part of the Kotayk region in the Armenian Republic. This article presents the results of the third fieldwork season, which involved both excavation and survey. In particular, the text describes the excavation of the Solak 1 fortress and dis- cusses its role in the framework of Middle Iron Age/Urartian archaeology. Keywords Kotayk Survey Project – Solak 1 – Urartu – Middle Iron Age – Kotayk region – Hrazdan River The Kotayk Survey Project (KSP) started in the summer of 2013. This is a joint Armenian–Italian project involving the study of the upper Hrazdan river valley, * “Introduction”, “Archaeological excavations in Solak 1”, “Room 1”, “The corridor” and “The main gate” were written jointly by both authors; Roberto Dan wrote “Some remarks on the Solak 1 Fortress”, “The Solak 1 Fortress in the context of Urartian and post-Urartian archaeol- ogy”; Artur Petrosyan wrote “The survey”, “The rescue excavations in Meghradzor village” and “Investigations in Kaghsi village”. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���7 | doi �0.��63/�468563�-��Downloaded340035 from Brill.com10/05/2021 07:46:43AM via free access The Kotayk Survey Project 295 located in the northern part of the Kotayk region in the Armenian Republic.1 The third season has seen the participation of both Armenian and Italian scholars in the project that is underpinned by a scientific cooperation agree- ment between the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Academy of Sciences of the Armenian Republic (IAE NAS RA) and the International Association of Mediterranean and Oriental Studies (ISMEO). The project has the patronage of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of the Italian Republic (MAECI, code ARC-001096). Its main goals may be sum- marized in the following points: 1) The creation of an archaeological map of the area between the upper River Hrazdan and the western foothills of the Geghama Range, from the Palaeolithic until the Middle Ages. 2) The investigation of human presence in prehistoric times in this part of the Hrazdan gorge and the area of the extinct volcano Guthanasar. 3) The study of the complex-society sites in the region (Early Bronze Age). 4) The study of the formation and growth of the first pre-state community in the region (Late Bronze–Early Iron Age). 5) The analysis of the nature of Urartian presence, the first state in the region (Middle Iron Age). 6) Investigation of the composition and characteristics of the settlements relating to the formation period of the Armenian nation (Late Iron Age). The third season, which took place between June 7 and July 7, involved: 1 The authors would like express their deepest thanks to Prof. Pavel Avetisyan, Director of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the National Academy of Sciences RA. The con- duction of the work from the Italian side has been possible thanks to the assistance of the Italian institutions that are supporting and financing the project. In this context, we would like to thank Prof. Adriano V. Rossi, President of ISMEO, and the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation (MAECI), the Italian Embassy and Ambassador Giovanni Ricciulli, and Prof. Laura Pacenti, the Italian cultural attaché in Yerevan. We would also like to thank Marie-Claude Trémouille, Boris Gasparyan, Ruben Badalyan, Adam T. Smith, Lori Khatchadourian and Ian Lindsay of the ArAGATS Project for their help and assistance. Special thanks are due to Tommaso Saccone, Yervand Grekyan (Armenian State Pedagogical University after Khachatour Abovyan), Samvel Nahapetyan (Yerevan State University, Faculty of Geography and Geology) and those who have worked with us: Mattia Raccidi, Ara Petrosyan, Armine Apresyan, Andranik Grigoryan, Hrach Avetisyan, Karen Mesropyan, Suren Margaryan, Arman Hovhannisyan and Gevorg Margaryan. Annali, Sezione orientale 77 (2017) 294–317 Downloaded from Brill.com10/05/2021 07:46:43AM via free access 296 Dan and PETROSYAN 1) The continued excavation of Solak 1, a newly discovered site covering 16 hectares. 2) The survey of the upper Kotayk region in order to produce an archaeo- logical map of the evidence of human activity from prehistoric times until the Middle Ages. 3) A number of trial excavations in important and endangered sites pro- posed for inclusion in the National Cultural Heritage List to evaluate their general nature and chronology. History of Archaeological Investigations in the Upper Hrazdan River Basin The Kotayk region includes the Hrazdan, Abovian and former Nairi administrative regions. The studied region includes the upper part of the river and the Hrazdan plateau (average altitude 1700–1800 m above sea level). The River Hrazdan (for- merly Zangu) is one of the left tributaries of the River Araxes (141 km in length). The river has 340 tributaries, 25 of which are more than 10 km long. The longest rivers are the Marmarik, Tsakhadzor, Arai and Getar. The area also contains the Geghama mountains, the Tsaghuniats mountain chain, and Mount Guthanasar. The administrative area covers some parts of the historical Ayrarat region of Armenia, in which are the Kotayk, Mazaz, Nig, Varazhnunik and Aragatsotn provinces. According to Urartian cuneiform inscriptions, this area was probably part of a country (or the territory of a tribe) called Etiuni. In the area under study by the Kotayk Survey Project excavations were conducted in a cemetery at Bjni in 1928 by E. Bayburtian (Khanzadyan 1967: 19). In the 1950s, H. Mnatsakanyan carried out excavations in a necropolis in Jrarat (Mnatsakanyan, Tiratsyan 1961: 69–70; Mnatsakanyan 1965: 95–96; Khanzadyan 1967: 18) and at a site dat- ing to the Early Bronze-Iron Age in Kaghsi (Mnatsakanyan 1954: 85, 86, 93; Khanzadyan 1967: 18). In the 1980s, S. Barkhudaryan investigated archaeo- logically the area of Meghradzor (Barkhudaryan 1935: 31). L. Biagov conducted excavations in Meghradzor and Aghavnadzor (Biagov 1986: 6–19; Gharibyan 2006: 126, 129), and E. Khanzadyan in Kaghsi (Khanzadyan 1967: 18). Since 2004, an expedition of Yerevan State University has been excavating a medi- eval settlement located in the gorge of the River Hrazdan, just in front of the village of Bjni (Gharibyan et al. 2008: 185–96; Gharibyan et al. 2010: 67–90). From 2004 onwards the archaeological site of Aramus, located on the southern border of the area under investigation by the Kotayk Survey Project, has been excavated under the direction of H. Avetisyan, W. Kuntner and S. Heinsch. Annali, Sezione orientaleDownloaded from 77 Brill.com10/05/2021(2017) 294–317 07:46:43AM via free access The Kotayk Survey Project 297 The site, divided into six fortified sectors, has furnished interesting evidence of occupation dating to the Early, Middle and Late Iron Age, i.e. the pre-Urartian, Urartian and ‘Achaemenid’ periods2 (Kuntner, Heinsch 2010; Heinsch, Kuntner, Avetisyan 2012). The initial archaeological investigation in Karashamb was carried out in 1966 (Karapetyan 1969: 278–83), and large-scale archaeological excavations were conducted in the 1980s, when more than 1000 Middle Bronze to Iron Age tombs were dug (Gevorgyan 1993: 50–60; Hovhannisyan 1993: 26–36; Melikyan 2015: 7). After a long break, controlled excavation began again in 2008 and has continued up to the present. In recent years 776 tombs have been recorded and 450 of these excavated (Melikyan 2015: 7–28). Since 2008 the Hrazdan Gorge Palaeolithic Project under the direction of B. Gasparyan, B. Yeritsyan and D. Adler has been active. The project is focused on the investigation of the Middle and Upper Pleistocene archaeology (750,000–11,500 years ago) of the Hrazdan Valley. Excavations have been conducted in the important sites of Lusakert 1 and Nor Gheri 1 (Adler et al. 2012). In 2012 the Marmarik Archaeology Project under the direction of A. Petrosyan, D. Peterson and J. Dudgeon started; the results are still unpublished. In 2015 the River Marmarik area was included in the Kotayk Survey Project. The Survey During the 2015 campaign, four archaeological sites were identified; these were added to the Kotayk Survey Project database site list (Fig. 1). Two unpublished caves with interesting archaeological potential (KSP 057 and KSP 058) were discovered. Cave KSP 057 is located on the western slopes of the Gegham mountain range, about 6 km east/south-east of the town of Lernanist. Cave KSP 058 is situated in the middle of the Gegham mountain range, 9.5 km south-east of two extinct volcanoes, on the border between the Kotayk and Gegharkunik regions. A fortress with Early Bronze Age pot- tery (Meghradzor 1/KSP 059) was studied in Meghradzor village on the north bank of River Marmarik, in the Marmarik Valley. A dam (KSP 060) was dis- covered in the hills around the Solak 1 fortress; it was built between two hills 2 Achaemenid is put in inverted commas because the archaeological evidence indicates a generic Achaemenid period occupation, given that to date no clear evidence of so-called Persepolitan architecture or material culture has been found in the site. Annali, Sezione orientale 77 (2017) 294–317 Downloaded from Brill.com10/05/2021 07:46:43AM via free access 298 Dan and PETROSYAN Figure 1 Map showing sites recorded in 2013–2015 (by T. Saccone). to collect water from springs and from the melting of the winter snow.3 Due to the absence of surface finds or specific architectural features, the struc- ture is not currently datable.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Orontids of Armenia by Cyril Toumanoff
    The Orontids of Armenia by Cyril Toumanoff This study appears as part III of Toumanoff's Studies in Christian Caucasian History (Georgetown, 1963), pp. 277-354. An earlier version appeared in the journal Le Muséon 72(1959), pp. 1-36 and 73(1960), pp. 73-106. The Orontids of Armenia Bibliography, pp. 501-523 Maps appear as an attachment to the present document. This material is presented solely for non-commercial educational/research purposes. I 1. The genesis of the Armenian nation has been examined in an earlier Study.1 Its nucleus, succeeding to the role of the Yannic nucleus ot Urartu, was the 'proto-Armenian,T Hayasa-Phrygian, people-state,2 which at first oc- cupied only a small section of the former Urartian, or subsequent Armenian, territory. And it was, precisely, of the expansion of this people-state over that territory, and of its blending with the remaining Urartians and other proto- Caucasians that the Armenian nation was born. That expansion proceeded from the earliest proto-Armenian settlement in the basin of the Arsanias (East- ern Euphrates) up the Euphrates, to the valley of the upper Tigris, and espe- cially to that of the Araxes, which is the central Armenian plain.3 This expand- ing proto-Armenian nucleus formed a separate satrapy in the Iranian empire, while the rest of the inhabitants of the Armenian Plateau, both the remaining Urartians and other proto-Caucasians, were included in several other satrapies.* Between Herodotus's day and the year 401, when the Ten Thousand passed through it, the land of the proto-Armenians had become so enlarged as to form, in addition to the Satrapy of Armenia, also the trans-Euphratensian vice-Sa- trapy of West Armenia.5 This division subsisted in the Hellenistic phase, as that between Greater Armenia and Lesser Armenia.
    [Show full text]
  • 40 CHURCHES in 7 DAYS 7 DAY TOUR ITINERARY* DAY 1 Meeting
    40 CHURCHES IN 7 DAYS 7 DAY TOUR ITINERARY* DAY 1 Meeting at the airport, transfer to the hotel and check-in. The first steps of your Pilgrimage will start from Katoghike Holy Mother of God and Zoravor Surb Astvatsatsin Churches, both dating back to the XIII century, situated in the centre of Yerevan. To get acquainted with the capital of Armenia, we will have a City Tour in Yerevan - one of the oldest continuously inhabited cities in the world and the only one, that has a "Birth Certificate" - a cuneiform inscription, left by King Argishti I on a basalt stone slab about the foundation of the city in 782 BC, displayed at the Erebuni Fortress-Museum. Yerevan is often pegged as the "Pink City" because of the colour of the stones used to build much of the city centre. Another name of Yerevan is an "Open-air Museum", the reason of which you will understand upon your visit. We will start the City tour from visiting Cascade Monument which is about 450 meters high and 50 meters wide. A panoramic view from the top of Cascade opens up a breathtaking city view with Opera House, Mount Ararat, Swan Lake, Republic Square and posh Northern Avenue, along which you will walk down during the tour. We will also visit Matenadaran, which means a "book-depository" in old Armenian. Indeed, Matenadaran is the pride of Armenian culture, the world's largest storage of ancient manuscripts. In fact, it is a scientific research institute of ancient manuscripts which stores more than 17 thousand ancient manuscripts and more than 100 thousand ancient archival documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Change in Eleventh-Century Armenia: the Evidence from Tarōn Tim Greenwood (University of St Andrews)
    Social Change in Eleventh-Century Armenia: the evidence from Tarōn Tim Greenwood (University of St Andrews) The social history of tenth and eleventh-century Armenia has attracted little in the way of sustained research or scholarly analysis. Quite why this should be so is impossible to answer with any degree of confidence, for as shall be demonstrated below, it is not for want of contemporary sources. It may perhaps be linked to the formative phase of modern Armenian historical scholarship, in the second half of the nineteenth century, and its dominant mode of romantic nationalism. The accounts of political capitulation by Armenian kings and princes and consequent annexation of their territories by a resurgent Byzantium sat very uncomfortably with the prevailing political aspirations of the time which were validated through an imagined Armenian past centred on an independent Armenian polity and a united Armenian Church under the leadership of the Catholicos. Finding members of the Armenian elite voluntarily giving up their ancestral domains in exchange for status and territories in Byzantium did not advance the campaign for Armenian self-determination. It is also possible that the descriptions of widespread devastation suffered across many districts and regions of central and western Armenia at the hands of Seljuk forces in the eleventh century became simply too raw, too close to the lived experience and collective trauma of Armenians in these same districts at the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth centuries, to warrant
    [Show full text]
  • “Khosrov Forest” State Reserve
    Strasbourg, 21 November 2011 [de05e_12.doc] T-PVS/DE (2012) 5 CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS GROUP OF SPECIALISTS -EUROPEAN DIPLOMA OF PROTECTED AREAS 9-10 FEBRUARY 2012, STRASBOURG ROOM 14, PALAIS DE L’EUROPE ---ooOoo--- APPLICATION PRESENTED BY THE MINISTRY OF NATURE PROTECTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA “KHOSROV FOREST” STATE RESERVE Document prepared by the Directorate of Culture and Cultural and Natural Heritage This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire - 2 - T-PVS/DE (2011) 5 Council of Europe European Diploma Area Information Form for candidate Sites Site Code (to be given by Council of Europe) B E 1. SITE IDENTIFICATION 1.1. SITE NAME “Khosrov Forest” State Reserve 1.2. COUNTRY Republic of Armenia 1.3. DATE CANDIDATURE 2 0 1 1 1.4. SITE INFORMATION 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 5 COMPILATION DATE Y Y Y Y M M D D 1.5. ADRESSES: Administrative Authorities National Authority Regional Authority Local Authority Name: “Environmental Project Name: Name: Implementation Unit” State Address: Address: Agency under the Ministry of Nature Protection of RA Address: 129 Armenakyan str., Yerevan, 0047 Republic of Armenia Tel.: Tel.: Fax.: Fax.: Tel.: +374 10 65 16 31 e-mail: e-mail: Fax.: +374 10 65 00 89 e-mail: [email protected] - 3 - T-PVS/DE (2011) 5 1.6. ADRESSES: Site Authorities Site Manager Site Information Centre Council of Europe Contact Name: “Khosrov Forest” State Name: “Khosrov Forest” State Name: “Environmental Project Reserve Reserve Implementation Unit” State Director Adress: : Kasyan 79 Agency -director (Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasdaq Omx Armenia and Central Depository of Armenia Annual Results 2011
    © Copyright 2010, The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. All rights reserved. NASDAQ OMX ARMENIA AND CENTRAL DEPOSITORY OF ARMENIA ANNUAL RESULTS 201 1 EXCHANGE ACTIVITY Pre-trading session and open auction mechanism introduced Securities IPO auction module was launched, thanks to which first ever IPO of corporate bonds , issued by “National Mortgage Company” RCO CJSC was organized in November, 2011 Within cooperation with Armenian Development Agency, investment program of the Exchange issuer, “Arstakh HEK”, was presented during a road show in 4 European countries New listing rules were developed to ensure application of corporate governance principles in listed companies DEPOSITORY ACTIVITY Foreign nominee accounts servicing Notifications to issuers on securities’ flow (securities transfer orders and securities blockage for In 2011 the Central pledge) Depository of Armenia launched the following Corporate securities transfer based on Delivery new services vesus Payment (DVP) principle for OTC market Temporary termination of blocked stocks’ voting righ ts in General meeting of a company’s shareholders in 2011 in cooperation with ANNA (Association of National Numbering Agencies) the Depositor started to provide CFI codes , along with ISIN codes, to listed securities. IMPORTANT EVENTS 2011 In October, 2011 NASDAQ OMX Armenia hosted 1st International Joint Conference of AECSD and IAEx of CIS with 116 participants, representing 77 companies from 14 NASDAQ OMX Armenia participated in one of the world’s leading economic forums – Saint Petersburg International Economic Forum in Russia, presenting Armenian experience of preparation to market integration Central Depository of Armenia participated in Central Securities Depositories CSD 11 International NASDAQ OMX Armenia held “Why and How to List” seminars for the members of Yerevan Chamber of Trade and Commerce and FREDA STOCK EXCHANGE TRADING SUMMARY 2011 © Copyright 2010, The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Environmental Examination
    5 ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FOR IMPROVEMENT OF EXAMINATION FOR RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND THE PROPOSED PROJECT SEWAGE SYSTEMS IN RA 5-1 Environmental Examination for Cultural Properties (1/2) Nos. of Nos. of Community cultural Rating Community cultural Rating properties properties ARAGATSOTN MARZ Akunq 9 D Lusagyugh 10 D Aghdzq 9 D Tsaghkahovit 5 D Antarut 3 D Tsaghkashen 2 D Ashnak 16 D Tsilqar 6 D Avan+Khnusik 36 D Katnaghbyur 10 D Avtona 13 D Karmrashen 13 D Aragats (Aparan district) 12 D Kaqavadzor 9 D Arayi 6 D Hartavan 15 D Arteni 1 D Dzoraglukh 14 D Apnagyugh 10 D Dzoragyugh 3 D Baysz 4 D Meliqgyugh 3 D Byurakan 40 D Miraq 4 D Garnahovit 10 D Mulqi 2 D Geghadir 1 D Nigavan 9 D Gegharot 11 D Norashen (Aparan district) 8 D Norashen (Aragats Davtashen 5 D District) 2 D Dian 4 D Shenavan 4 D Yeghipartush 8 D Shgharshik 2 D Yeghnik 10 D Vosketas 2 D Yernjatap 14 D Chqnagh 6 D Zovasar 3 D Vardenis 14 D Ttujur 7 D Vardenut 5 D Irind 6 D Verin Sasunik 18 D Lernapar 4 D Tegher 2 D Lernarot 24 D Orgov 24 D SHIRAK MARZ Alvar 3 D Krasar 6 D Aghvorik 2 D Hovit 11 D Ardenis 3 D Dzorashen 1 D Arpeni 6 D Mets Sariar 3 D Bandivan 14 D Musaelyan 19 D Bashgyugh 8 D Shaghik 3 D Garnaritch + Yeghnajur 4 D Shirak 2 D Kamkhut 2 D Pemzashen 12 D Lernakert 12 D Jajur 4 D Lernut 4 D Jrarat 18 D Tsaghkut 5 D Sarnaghbyur 45 D Kamo 12 D Sarapat 2 D Karmrakar 10 D Sizavet 1 D Kaqavasar 3 D Tzoghamarg 8 D Krashen 2 D Poqr Sariar 2 D Source: The Study Team (2007) EE-1-1/2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY FOR IMPROVEMENT OF EXAMINATION FOR RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND THE PROPOSED PROJECT SEWAGE SYSTEMS IN RA 5-1 Environmental Examination for Cultural Properties (2/2) Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Depth Review of the Investment Climate and Market Structure in the Energy Sector of the REPUBLIC of ARMENIA
    In-depth review of the investment climate and market structure in the energy sector of THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ENERGY CHARTER SECRETATIAT 22 January 2015 In-depth review of the investment climate and market structure in the energy sector of THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ENERGY CHARTER SECRETATIAT 22 January 2015 About the Energy Charter The Energy Charter Secretariat is the permanent office based in Brussels supporting the Energy Charter Conference in the implementation of the Energy Charter Treaty. The Energy Charter Treaty and the Energy Charter Protocol on Energy Efficiency and Related Environmental Aspects were signed in December 1994 and entered into legal force in April 1998. To date, the Treaty has been signed or acceded to by fifty-two states, the European Community and Euratom (the total number of its members is therefore fifty-four). The fundamental aim of the Energy Charter Treaty is to strengthen the rule of law on energy issues, by creating a level playing field of rules to be observed by all participating governments, thereby mitigating risks associated with energy-related investment and trade. In a world of increasing interdependence between net exporters of energy and net importers, it is widely recognised that multilateral rules can provide a more balanced and efficient framework for international cooperation than is offered by bilateral agreements alone or by non-legislative instruments. The Energy Charter Treaty therefore plays an important role as part of an international effort to build a legal foundation for energy security, based on the principles of open, competitive markets and sustainable development. The Treaty was developed on the basis of the 1991 Energy Charter.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Armenia Legislative Strengthening Program
    FINAL REPORT ARMENIA LEGISLATIVE STRENGTHENING PROGRAM Submitted to: USAID/Armenia Under: Contract No. OUT-AEP-I-00-00-00004-00 Task Order No. 803 Prepared by: Eleanor Valentine, Chief-of-Party Alex Sardar, Deputy Chief-of-Party Submitted by: Development Associates, Inc. 1730 North Lynn Street Arlington, Virginia 22209-2023 September 30, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ ii I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 II. Background ......................................................................................................................... 1 III. Expected Performance Outcomes ....................................................................................... 2 IV. Challenges of the Program .................................................................................................. 3 V. Program Activities to Meet Goals in each of the Task Areas April 2002 - August 2004.....................................................................................................5 VI. Accomplishments of the Program......................................................................................26 VII. Recommendations for Future Legislative Strengthening Efforts.......................................31 APPENDICES Appendix A Training Report...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia, Republic of | Grove
    Grove Art Online Armenia, Republic of [Hayasdan; Hayq; anc. Pers. Armina] Lucy Der Manuelian, Armen Zarian, Vrej Nersessian, Nonna S. Stepanyan, Murray L. Eiland and Dickran Kouymjian https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T004089 Published online: 2003 updated bibliography, 26 May 2010 Country in the southern part of the Transcaucasian region; its capital is Erevan. Present-day Armenia is bounded by Georgia to the north, Iran to the south-east, Azerbaijan to the east and Turkey to the west. From 1920 to 1991 Armenia was a Soviet Socialist Republic within the USSR, but historically its land encompassed a much greater area including parts of all present-day bordering countries (see fig.). At its greatest extent it occupied the plateau covering most of what is now central and eastern Turkey (c. 300,000 sq. km) bounded on the north by the Pontic Range and on the south by the Taurus and Kurdistan mountains. During the 11th century another Armenian state was formed to the west of Historic Armenia on the Cilician plain in south-east Asia Minor, bounded by the Taurus Mountains on the west and the Amanus (Nur) Mountains on the east. Its strategic location between East and West made Historic or Greater Armenia an important country to control, and for centuries it was a battlefield in the struggle for power between surrounding empires. Periods of domination and division have alternated with centuries of independence, during which the country was divided into one or more kingdoms. Page 1 of 47 PRINTED FROM Oxford Art Online. © Oxford University Press, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission in Armenia 29 March to 3 April 2008
    Mission in Armenia 29 March to 3 April 2008 June 2008 - N°499/2 Mission in Armenia, 29 March to 3 April 2008 FOREWORD Alerted by both the "Democracy in Armenia" group and the Civil Society Institute (an FIDH affiliate) to the violent repression that followed the presidential elections in this country in February 2008, the undersigned lawyers and jurist were mandated by the President of the Paris Bar Association (M. le Bâtonnier de l’Ordre des Avocats de Paris) and the International Union of Lawyers (l’Union Internationale des Avocats) on one hand and, on the other hand, the FIDH (International Federation of Human Rights). The mission visited Yerevan from 29 March to 3 April to report on the situation of the right to defend oneself and the right to freedoms in the Republic of ARMENIA following the events that took place in February and March 2008. INTRODUCTION Before considering the legal and juridical context of the mission's work, it is appropriate to recall some chronological milestones to put into perspective the current situation in Armenia and its evolution, seventeen years after the independence of the Republic of Armenia was proclaimed in the Southern Caucasus. - 21 September, 1991: the Republic of Armenia becomes independent following a referendum. - October 1991: Election by universal suffrage of Mr. Levon TER-PETROSIAN, who becomes the first President of the Republic of Armenia. - 1992-1994: Fighting in the autonomous region of Nagorno-Karabakh between the opposing Armenian self- defence forces and the Azerbaijan armed forces. A cease-fire comes into force on 14 May 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SONS of SENEK‛ERIM YOVHANNĒS, the LAST KING of VASPURAKAN, AS BYZANTINE ARISTOCRATS By
    THE SONS OF SENEK‛ERIM YOVHANNĒS, THE LAST KING OF VASPURAKAN, AS BYZANTINE ARISTOCRATS by WERNER SEIBT The last king of Vaspurakan, a region located to the south and southeast of Lake Van, was the well-known Senek‛erim Yovhannēs. Because he had joined secretly the anti-Byzantine alliance of the Georgian king Giorgi, he had to pay a heavy price. Vaspurakan became a Byzantine ducate in 1022, and the royal family had to migrate to Kappadokia, probably in the winter 1022/23. For the details it is enough to refer to my article in Handes Amso- rya many years ago.1 Senek‛erim’s sons used this name (of semitic origin) as a kind of family name. In Greek it normally appears as Senacherim/Senachereim. Senek‛erim Yovhannēs Arcruni, the king of Vaspurakan (1003-1022), was the son of Abusahl Hamazasp. After his forced emigration he lived some years in Kappadokia, where he died around 1025. We don’t know any seal of him. He was married to Xušuš, the daughter of the Armenian king Gagik I. Some years ago I published her seal (of mediocre preservation) which she used after her husband had passed away.2 It was in the Zacos collection and is now in Paris.3 Fig. 1. Seal of Chususa Zoste, the mother of David Senacherem Magistros. 1 SEIBT 1978a. 2 SEIBT 1997, 269-272; 408-409. 3 BnF 567; for the photo we thank Jean-Claude Cheynet. REArm37 (2016-2017) 119-133. doi: 10.2143/REA.37.0.3237120 120 W. SEIBT On the obverse there is a bust of the Theotokos, the hands in a kind of modest Deesis in front of the breast (“Minimalorantentypus” according to Herbert Hunger).
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Monuments Awareness Project
    Armenian Monuments Awareness Project Armenian Monuments Awareness Project he Armenian Monuments Awareness Proj- ect fulfills a dream shared by a 12-person team that includes 10 local Armenians who make up our Non Governmental Organi- zation. Simply: We want to make the Ar- T menia we’ve come to love accessible to visitors and Armenian locals alike. Until AMAP began making installations of its infor- Monuments mation panels, there remained little on-site mate- rial at monuments. Limited information was typi- Awareness cally poorly displayed and most often inaccessible to visitors who spoke neither Russian nor Armenian. Bagratashen Project Over the past two years AMAP has been steadily Akhtala and aggressively upgrading the visitor experience Haghpat for local visitors as well as the growing thousands Sanahin Odzun of foreign tourists. Guests to Armenia’s popular his- Kobair toric and cultural destinations can now find large and artistically designed panels with significant information in five languages (Armenian, Russian, Gyumri Fioletovo Aghavnavank English, French, Italian). Information is also avail- Goshavank able in another six languages on laminated hand- Dilijan outs. Further, AMAP has put up color-coded direc- Sevanavank tional road signs directing drivers to the sites. Lchashen Norashen In 2009 we have produced more than 380 sources Noratuz of information, including panels, directional signs Amberd and placards at more than 40 locations nation- wide. Our Green Monuments campaign has plant- Lichk Gegard ed more than 400 trees and
    [Show full text]