World Bank Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

World Bank Document Public Disclosure Authorized AGRICULTURE GLOBAL PRACTICE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PAPER Public Disclosure Authorized MOZAMBIQUE: AGRICULTURAL SECTOR RISK ASSESSMENT RISK PRIORITIZATION Public Disclosure Authorized Kilara C. Suit and Vikas Choudhary WORLD BANK GROUP REPORT NUMBER 96289-MZ AUGUST 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized AGRICULTURE GLOBAL PRACTICE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PAPER MOZAMBIQUE: AGRICULTURAL SECTOR RISK ASSESSMENT Risk Prioritization Kilara C. Suit and Vikas Choudhary © 2015 World Bank Group 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved This volume is a product of the staff of the World Bank Group. The fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily refl ect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank Group or the governments they represent. The World Bank Group does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank Group concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. World Bank Group encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clear- ance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone: 978-750-8400, fax: 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright .com/. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Offi ce of the Publisher, World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax: 202-522-2422, e-mail: [email protected]. Cover photo credits from left to right: Peter Casier/UN World Food Programme, Kate Raisz/Bread for the World, and Marcos Villalta/ Save the Children. CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations ix Acknowledgments xi Executive Summary xiii Chapter One: Introduction and Context 1 Chapter Two: Mozambique’s Agricultural System 5 Agro-Ecological Conditions 5 Land and Water Resources 6 Crop Production Systems 7 Livestock Production System 9 Principal Constraints 10 Chapter Three: Agricultural Sector Risks 11 Production Risks 11 Market Risks 18 Enabling Environment Risk 21 Independent Risks Occurring Simultaneously 21 Dependent Risks 21 Regional Shocks 22 Diff erential Impact of Risk 22 Climate Change 22 Chapter Four: Quantifi cation of Losses and Impact of Agricultural Risks 25 Conceptual and Methodological Basis for Analysis 25 Indicative Quantifi cation of Losses 25 Expected Losses and Risk Priorities for Production 26 Impact of Agricultural Risks on National GDP 29 Chapter Five: Stakeholder Risk Assessments 31 Government 31 Producers 32 Vulnerable Groups 33 Chapter Six: Risk Prioritization and Management 35 Risk Prioritization 36 Risk Management 36 References 47 Appendix A: Methodology/Approach to Production Risk Losses Calculation 49 Appendix B: Weather Yield Report 51 Background 51 Rainfall Patterns in Mozambique 52 Risk Prioritization iii Drought and Excess Rainfall Analysis 52 Summary 52 Rainfall—Yield Regressions 54 Maize (Milho) 54 Rice (Arroz) 55 Sorghum (Mapira) 56 Groundnuts (Amendoim) 58 Appendix C: Climate Change Impact Assessment on Agriculture in Mozambique: Literature Review 61 Introduction 61 Principal Findings 61 Brief History of Climate Change Impact Assessments 62 Methodologies and Temperature/Precipitation Projections 62 General Findings 65 Maize 66 Cassava 66 Soy 66 Sorghum 68 Other Crops 68 Conclusion 69 Limitations 73 Appendix D: Vulnerability Analysis 75 Definitions 75 Recent General Trends in Vulnerability 75 Vulnerable Groups and Characteristics 76 Appendix E: Commodity Risk Profiles 81 Poultry 82 Sorghum 84 Tobacco 85 Vegetables 87 Groundnuts 89 Cashew Nuts 91 Cotton 93 Sugarcane 95 Cassava 97 Maize 99 Appendix F: Risk Transfer and Financing Options in Mozambique 101 Microlevel Options 101 Mesolevel Options 102 Macrolevel Options 102 BOXES Box 4.1: Crop Losses According to the Agricultural Census 28 iv Mozambique: Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment FIGURES Figure ES.1: Major Shocks to Crop and Livestock Production: Annual Percentage Growth in Agriculture Value Added xiv Figure ES.2: Acute Food Insecure Population in Mozambique xiv Figure ES.3: Estimated Aggregate Total Losses by Risk Event xvi Figure 2.1: Agro-Ecological Conditions—Mozambique 6 Figure 2.2: Maize Production, 1992–2011 7 Figure 2.3: Rice Production, 1992–2011 8 Figure 2.4: Cassava Production, 1992–2011 8 Figure 2.5: Mozambique Agricultural Export Shares in US$, 2010 9 Figure 2.6: Consumption and Production of Poultry in Mozambique, 2005–09 9 Figure 3.1: Major Shocks to Crop and Livestock Production: Annual Percentage Growth in Agriculture Value Added 12 Figure 3.2: Deficit Rainfall Events Based on Weather Station Data Analysis 13 Figure 3.3: Ex cess Rainfall Events Based on Weather Station Data Analysis 14 Figure 3.4: M onthly Retail Prices of Maize (White) in Key Markets in US$/Ton 18 Figure 3.5: M onthly Retail Prices of Rice in Key Markets in US$/Ton 18 Figure 3.6: In ternational Monthly Prices for Sugar 19 Figure 3.7: In ternational Monthly Prices for Cotton “A” Index 19 Figure 3.8: Ex change Rate Risks—Metical/Rand 20 Figure 3.9: Ex change Rate Risks—Metical/Euro and Metical/US$ 20 Figure 4.1: Estima ted Aggregate Total Losses by Risk Event 26 Figure B4.1.1: Principal Cause of Crop Losses 28 Figure 4.2: Annual GDP Growth and GDP per Capita 28 Figure 5.1: Adverse Impact of Agricultural Risks on Inflation 32 Figure 5.2: Acute Food Insecurity in Mozambique 34 Figure B.1: Provinces of Mozambique 51 Figure B.2: L ocation of Meteorological Stations 52 Figure B.3: Mean Cumulative Rainfall per Month 53 Figure B.4: Drought Events, 1979–2009 53 Figure B.5: Excess Rainfall Events, 1979–2009 54 Figure B.6: Midseason Regression Models for Niassa, Inhambane, and Maputo Provinces 55 Figure B.7: 2008 Rice Surface Sown by Region (hectares) 56 Figure B.8: 2008 Sorghum Surface Sown by Region (hectares) 57 Figure B.9: Sorghum Yield Histogram for All Regions 57 Figure B.10: 2008 Groundnuts Surface Sown by Region (hectares) 58 Figure B.11: Groundnut Yield for All Regions 59 Figure C.1: Annual Cycle of Rainfall, Maximum Temperature, Potential Evapotranspiration, and Potential Moisture Index 63 Risk Prioritization v Figure C.2: Climate Change Effects on Yield for All Major Crops 65 Figure C.3: Change In Yield with Climate Change: Rain-Fed Maize 68 Figure C.4: Maps of Land Suitability and Hotspots Resulting from Climate Change, for Maize 68 Figure C.5: Expected Changes in the Future (2046–65) for Maize (Expressed in kg/ha) under Rain-Fed Agriculture Based on the Median of All Seven GCMs 69 Figure C.6: Change in Land Suitability per Crop Resulting from Climate Change 69 Figure C.7: A. Projected Changes in the Future (2046–65) for Cassava in Percentage of Present Yields. B. Projected Changes in the Future (2046–65) for Cassava in kg/ha 71 Figure C.8: Maps of Land Suitability and Hotspots Resulting from Climate Change, for Soy 71 Figure C.9: A. Projected Changes in the Future (2046–65) of Soybean Yields in Percentage of Present Yields. B. Projected Changes in the Future (2046–65) for Soybeans in kg/ha 72 Figure C.10: Maps of Land Suitability and Hotspots Resulting from Climate Change, for Sorghum 72 Figure C.11: A. Projected Changes in Future (2046–65) for Sorghum (Median of All Seven GCMs), Expressed in Percentage of Present Yields. B. Projected Changes in the Future (2046–65) for Sorghum (Median of All Seven GCMs), Expressed in kg/ha 73 Figure C.12: A. Projected Changes in the Future (2046–65) for Cotton (Median of All Seven GCMs), Expressed in Percentage of Present Yields. B. Projected Changes in the Future (2046–65) for Cotton (Median of All Seven GCMs), Expressed in kg/ha 74 Figure C.13: A. Projected Changes in the Future (2046–65) for Groundnuts in Percentage of Present Yields. B. Projected Changes in the Future (2046–65) for Groundnuts, Expressed in kg/ha 74 Figure D.1: Vulnerable Groups within Mozambique 76 Figure D.2: Vulnerability Characteristics 76 Figure D.3: Provinces Where Vulnerability Characteristic Is More Common 79 Figure E.1: Domestic Price Volatility, Poultry 82 Figure E.2: Domestic Price Volatility, Sorghum 84 Figure E.3: Domestic Price Volatility, Goundnuts 89 Figure E.4: Domestic Price Volatility, Cashew Nuts (with Shell) 92 Figure E.5: Cotton Yields, 1965–2007 (kg/ha) 94 Figure E.6: International Cotton Prices, 2005–10 94 Figure E.7: Domestic Price Volatility, Sugarcane 96 Figure E.8: International Price Volatility, Cassava 98 Figure E.9: Domestic and International Price Volatility, Maize 100 TABLES Table ES.1: Filtering of Risk Management Interventions and Potential for Multiple “Wins” xvii Table 2.1: Number of Agricultural and Livestock Production Units in Mozambique 6 Table 2.2: Agricultural GDP Share in Mozambique, 2009 7 Table 3.1: Summary of Drought Events 13 Table 3.2: Summary of Flood Events 15 vi Mozambique: Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment Table 3.3: Summary of Pest and Disease Events 16 Table 3.4: Summary of Wildfire Events 16 Table 3.5: Summary of Cyclone Events 16 Table 3.6: Projected Changes for
Recommended publications
  • Disasters, Climate Change and Human Mobility in Southern Africa: Consultation on the Draft Protection Agenda
    DISASTERS, CLIMATE CHANGE AND HUMAN MOBILITY IN SOUTHERN AFRICA: CONSULTATION ON THE DRAFT PROTECTION AGENDA BACKGROUND PAPER South Africa Regional Consultation in cooperation with the Development and Rule of Law Programme (DROP) at Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch, South Africa, 4-5 June 2015 DISASTERS CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISPLACEMENT EVIDENCE FOR ACTION NORWEGIAN NRC REFUGEE COUNCIL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Southern Africa Consultation will be hosted by the Development and Rule of Law Programme (DROP) at Stellenbosch University in South Africa and co-organized in partnership with the Nansen Initiative Secretariat and the Norwegian Refugee Council. The project is funded by the European Union with the support of Norway and Switzerland Federal Department of Foreign Aairs FDFA CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................6 1.1 Background to the Nansen Initiative Southern Africa Consultation ...............................................................................7 1.2 Objectives of the Southern Africa Consultation ............................................................................................................7 2. OVERVIEW OF DISASTERS AND HUMAN MOBILITY IN SOUTHERN AFRICA ..............................................................9 2.1 Natural Hazards and Climate Change in Southern Africa ............................................................................................10 2.2 Challenge
    [Show full text]
  • Mozambique Fieldwork Report
    Strategic Research into National and Local Capacity Building for DRM Mozambique Fieldwork Report Roger Few, Zoë Scott, Kelly Wooster, Mireille Flores Avila, Marcela Tarazona, Antonio Queface and Alberto Mavume. June 2015 Mozambique Fieldwork Report Acknowledgements The OPM Research Team would like to express sincere thanks to Roberto White from GFDRR Mozambique, Joao Ribeiro from INGC and Wild do Rosário from UN-Habitat for sharing their time and resources. We would also like to thank Joczabet Guerrero and Konstanze Kamojer for their invaluable advice and guidance in relation to the GIZ PRO-GRC project. Finally, we would like to thank all those interviewees and workshop attendees who freely gave their time, expert opinion and enthusiasm, and to Antonio Beleza who assisted the team during the fieldwork. This assessment is being carried out by Oxford Policy Management and the University of East Anglia. The Project Manager is Zoë Scott and the Research Director is Roger Few. For further information contact [email protected] Oxford Policy Management Limited 6 St Aldates Courtyard Tel +44 (0) 1865 207 300 38 St Aldates Fax +44 (0) 1865 207 301 Oxford OX1 1BN Email [email protected] Registered in England: 3122495 United Kingdom Website www.opml.co.uk © Oxford Policy Management i Mozambique Fieldwork Report Table of Contents Acknowledgements i List of Boxes and Tables 3 List of Abbreviations 4 1 Introduction and methodology 7 1.1 Introduction to the research 7 1.2 Methodology 8 1.2.1 Data collection tools 9 1.2.2 Case study procedure 10 1.2.3
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Sun Article
    South African Weather Service Watching the Weather to Protect Life and Property Strong winds and other kinds of rough weather can destroy WHOWHO WE WE ARE ARE houses and lives . THE South African Weather Service is the advanced equipment that aids us in the national provider of weather and climate-re- monitoring and prediction of weather pat- lated information. terns and the collection of climatic-related The past 10 years has seen an increase in information. weather-related natural disasters that have Our improved national weather observa- affected the lives of local communities. tion network has resulted in more accurate The deaths, injuries and damage to prop- weather and climate information, that helps erty caused have hampered sustainable de- us to provide bad weather early warning sys- velopment in both urban and rural commu- tems to the Republic of South Africa. nities, and we play an important role in The South African Weather Service is at helping the South African government to the forefront of providing weather and cli- lessen the effects of weather-related natural mate information in South Africa and we are disasters. confident that the years ahead will see even As an organisation, we are committed to more measures being developed to help pro- reducing the impact of these disasters by in- tect the South African public and keep vesting in the latest and most technologically weather related damage to a minimum. CELEBRATE WORLD METEOROLOGICAL DAY EACH year, on 23 March, the World Meteoro- a specialised agency of the United Nations. resulting distribution of water resources. community to see that that important weather logical Organisation (WMO) – a United Nations The theme for World Meteorological Day South Africa is represented at WMO by the and climate information is available and accessi- organisationwith189members–andtheworld- 2013 is “Watching the Weather to Protect Life CEO of the South African Weather Service ble for global programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Agromet Update Issue 04
    Food Security Early Warning System Agromet Update 2011/2012 Agricultural Season Issue 05 Month: January Season: 2011-2012 Release date: 21-02-2012 Highlights • Tropical cyclones, depressions and torrential rains result in flooding in several countries in the eastern parts of the region, including Madagascar, Malawi, Mozambique, and South Africa • Dryness negatively affects Vuli season in northern Tanzania Regional Summary Rainfall was generally below normal in many parts of the region in the month of January and in early February. Although slightly below normal (yellow colours, Figure 1) in most areas, some areas including northern Tanzania, southern Mozambique, southern Zimbabwe, and eastern Botswana received significantly below normal rains. The dryness in northern Tanzania has reportedly affected the bimodal crops. Tropical Storm Dando brought heavy rainfall and flooding that affected southern Mozambique and northern South Africa in mid-January. This was followed by dryness in the next two dekads, which would potentially allow the flood waters to recede. Shortly after, northern Mozambique and Madagascar were affected by Tropical Cyclone Funso, resulting in Figure 1. Rainfall for 1 Jan – 10 Feb 2012 as percent of average extensive flooding in some areas. Southern Malawi was also affected by flooding due to continuous heavy rains that were received since late January. The Malawi Department of Disaster Management Affairs indicated that over 5,000 households have been affected by flooding so far this season, and some cropped area had been lost. In Mozambique, a multi-sectoral assessment in February estimated that almost 33,500 households had been affected by the flooding, and Mozambique’s Ministry of Agriculture indicated that 123,000 ha of planted area had been affected, of which 6000 ha were completely lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Malawi 10-Day Rainfall & Agrometeorological Bulletin
    Malawi 10-Day Rainfall & Agrometeorological Bulletin Department of Climate Change and Meteorological Services Period: 21 – 31 January 2012 Season: 2011/2012 Issue No.12 Release date: 3rd February 2012 HIGHLIGHTS • Above average rains recorded in the south and light to moderate elsewhere… • Heavy floods wreck houses, crops and livestock in lower Shire districts… • Widespread rains are expected over Malawi during first ten days of February 2012… All inquiries should be addressed to: The Director of Climate Change and Meteorological Services, P.O. Box 1808, Blantyre, MALAWI Tel: (265) 1 822 014/106 Fax: (265) 1 822 215 E-mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.metmalawi.com Period: 21 – 31 January 2012 Season: 2011/12 Issue No 12 1.1 RAINFALL SITUATION relative humidity values ranged from 69% at Karonga to 87% at Makoka in Zomba. More details are on the During the last ten days of January 2012, shallow Congo Table 2. Air mass caused light and below average rainfall (yellow and brown colours on Map 1) along the lakeshore and 1.6 MEAN SUNSHINE HOURS other areas of central and northern Malawi while Tropical cyclone FUNSO in Mozambique Channel Malawi experienced cloudy to overcast skies during the caused torrential rains particularly over the catchment period under review. Reports from sampled stations area of Shire River in southern Malawi, triggering indicate that daily average sunshine hours ranged from 1.1 flooding downstream hours of bright sunshine at Bvumbwe to 4.6 hours at in the lower Shire Mzimba Met station. districts of Chikhwawa and Nsanje during the 2. AGROMETEOROLOGICAL ASSESSMENT first half of the period under review.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugarcane Contract Farming with Smallholders in Xinavane, Mozambique: Neo-Colonialism Or Development Opportunity?
    Sugarcane contract farming with smallholders in Xinavane, Mozambique: Neo-colonialism or development opportunity? A case study in association management, day-to-day interactions and livelihood strategies MSc. Thesis by Ernst Sonneveld February 2012 Irrigation and Water Engineering Group i ii Sugarcane contract farming with smallholders in Xinavane, Mozambique: Neo-colonialism or development opportunity? A case study in association management, day-to-day interactions and livelihood strategies Master thesis Irrigation and Water Engineering submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Master of Science in International Land and Water Management at Wageningen University, the Netherlands Ernst Sonneveld February 2012 Supervisors: Dr.ir. Alex Bolding Dr.ir. Gert Jan Veldwisch Irrigation and Water Engineering Group Centre for Water and Climate Wageningen University The Netherlands www.iwe.wur.nl/uk iii iv ABSTRACT Rising food prices and the demand for fossil fuel alternatives have resulted in large scale land acquisitions by foreign investors in developing countries. Especially Mozambique has become an interesting partner, given its favourable trade agreements, its cheap labour reserve and its enormous agricultural potential. As a result, colonial estates have been rehabilitated and even extended, in particular by the sugar sector. With stimulating measures from the government, the Açucareira de Xinavane, now owned by South African’s largest sugar producer is turning to contract farming as a means to involve the local population while extending their agricultural potential and increasing Mozambican’s sugar exports. Contract farming can be regarded as a way to lift the poor out of poverty by providing them with loans, infrastructural (irrigation technology) and know-how support and income security, but this does not happen unconditionally.
    [Show full text]
  • Study & Master Geography Grade 12 Teacher's Guide
    Ge0graphy CAPS Grade Teacher’s Guide Helen Collett • Norma Catherine Winearls Peter J Holmes 12 SM_Geography_12_TG_CAPS_ENG.indd 1 2013/06/11 6:21 PM Study & Master Geography Grade 12 Teacher’s Guide Helen Collett • Norma Catherine Winearls • Peter J Holmes SM_Geography_12_TG_TP_CAPS_ENGGeog Gr 12 TG.indb 1 BW.indd 1 2013/06/116/11/13 7:13:30 6:09 PMPM CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Mexico City Cambridge University Press The Water Club, Beach Road, Granger Bay, Cape Town 8005, South Africa www.cup.co.za © Cambridge University Press 2013 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2013 ISBN 978-1-107-38162-9 Editor: Barbara Hutton Proofreader: Anthea Johnstone Artists: Sue Abraham and Peter Holmes Typesetter: Brink Publishing & Design Cover image: Gallo Images/Wolfgang Poelzer/Getty Images ………………………………………………......…………………………………………………………… ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Photographs: Peter Holmes: pp. 267, 271, 273 and 274 Maps: Chief Directorate: National Geo-spatial Information: Department of Rural Development and Land Reform: pp. 189, 233–235 and 284–289 ………………………………………………......…………………………………………………………… Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. Information regarding prices, travel timetables and other factual information given in this work are correct at the time of first printing but Cambridge University Press does not guarantee the accuracy of such information thereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Analysis for Mangroves for the Future: Understanding the Resilience of Coastal Systems
    Situation analysis for Mangroves for the Future: Understanding the resilience of coastal systems Melita Samoilys1, George Waweru Maina1, Julie Church1, Brigid Mibei1, Marta Monjane2, Abdulla Shah2, Doris Mutta3 and Mine Pabari2 1. CORDIO East Africa 2. IUCN 3. Nairobi Convention Secretariat (UNEP) March 2013 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction and background The purpose of this situation analysis is to better understand ecological and social coastal systems in Eastern Africa with a view to identifying key areas and effective strategies through which MFF can contribute to the conservation, restoration and sustainable management of coastal ecosystems as key natural infrastructure which support human well-being, resilience and security (see Fig.1). More specifically, the analysis has attempted to address the following questions: A. To what extent are coastal systems1 able to be resilient2 to global change (eg. climate) so as to enable sustainable development3? B. What are the key factors affecting the resilience (illustrated in Fig. 1) of coastal systems?; C. How effective are current responses to vulnerability at local, national and regional levels? The approach of this study was largely a desk based review but was framed within an resilience-based analytical framework (Figure 1). Thus published papers and reports were interrogated using this framework to try and distil the most relevant information to a) understand the resilience of the coastal systems, both ecological and socio- economic, and b) help direct attention and focus on key areas to which MFF-WIO can contribute, either geographically or through socio-political processes. Global change is defined here for this review as changes caused by increasing greenhouse gas emissions resulting in a high CO2 world and the direct and indirect changes that ensue.
    [Show full text]
  • FATHUM Policy Brief
    FATHUM Policy Brief April 2020 FbF - A mechanism for improved Disaster Preparedness in Mozambique Who should read this? • Disaster Risk Management, Water resources management and Meteorology policy makers and planners in government and humanitarian practitioners in institutions Key messages • FbF improves disaster preparedness. • FbF is founded on good forecast capacity. • FbF implementation requires good communication and mobilization capacity at local level. • FbF must be informed by local risk context Executive Summary This policy brief summarizes the results of a study designed by a transboundary three-party team of researchers and conducted from 2017-2019 in flood-prone districts of the Gaza Province in Mozambique. Led by UDM’s Centro de Investigação e Extensão from 2017 to 2019, the study’s purpose was to examine the relevance of the biophysical drivers of risk (disaster risk profile and history), the local disaster risk management capacity and institutional arrangements as well as the established early warning systems in the implementation of Forecast based Financing (FbF) Findings: • Communities are aware of flood risk. • Communities have primary dwellings in higher grounds whilst keeping another abode in the flood prone fertile lowlands. • Communities know escape routes to move their cattle to safe grounds. • Local EWS are in place. • Central and local DRM entities are in place but do not seem to know about FbF. • Early Action Protocols are signed for floods. • In country forecast capacity needs modernization. • Vertical communication needs improvement Recommendations: • Central and local DRM institutions must be made aware of FbF mechanism. • Meteorological and Water Resource Management authorities must use state of art technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Membrane Fouling and Visualisation Studies
    AN INTEGRATED EARLY WARNING FORECAST SYSTEM FOR WET SEASONS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO FLOODING EVENTS: A PREDICTABILITY STUDY IN SUPPORT OF HYDROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS Report to the Water Research Commission by LE Mpheshea; FA Engelbrecht; AF Beraki; R Maisha; R Nkoana and J van der Merwe Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) WRC Report No. 2522/1/18 ISBN 978-0-6392-0044-6 September 2018 Obtainable from: Water Research Commission Private Bag X03 Gezina, 0031 [email protected] or download from www.wrc.org.za DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Printed in the Republic of South Africa © WATER RESEARCH COMMISSION ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Southern Africa, defined here as the landmass area enclosed between 22–35° S and 12–36° E, receives the bulk of its rainfall during the austral summer. Moreover, the region exhibits pronounced interannual rainfall variability linked to the teleconnected influence of sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies in the tropical Pacific Ocean. In events where anomalously positive (negative) SSTs are observed over the domain between 5° N and 5° S and between 120° W and 170° W, which is commonly referred to as the Niño 3.4 region, there tends to be higher (lower) than normal rainfall conditions over southern Africa. For the purpose of this project, the sub-region located in north-eastern South Africa [2–28° S; 24–33° E] is considered as the main focus area.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment for the Schools Sector in Mozambique
    Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment for the Schools Sector in Mozambique Christophe Briere João de Lima Rego Andreas Burzel Conceição Leite Dana Stuparu Maaike Maarse Mark de Bel 1230818-002 © Deltares, 2018, B Deltares Title Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment for the Schools Sector in Mozambique Clienl Projecl Reference Pages World BanklGFDRR 1230818-002 1230818-002-ZKS-0008 89 Keywords Safe schools, earthquakes, coastal flooding, river flooding, cyclones, landslides, risk assessment, retrofitting options, awareness raising Summary To address the issue of school safety globally, the World Bank / Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (WB/GFDRR) launched the Global Program for Safer Schools. As part of this initiative in Mozambique, the WB/GFDRR has given an assignment to Deltares to better understand the risk to the school sector through a multi-hazard (riverine floods, coastal floods, cyclone winds, earthquakes, landslides) disaster risk assessment. A cost-benefit analysis of retrofitting options is also conducted for each identified building typology. In this assignment, hazard, exposure and vulnerability information is available from previous studies such as the R5 project and the Safer Schools project itself. The execution of the multi• hazard risk assessment is done with the Delft-FIAT model. At national level, the annual expected damage is estimated to be 2,125,000 $/year and 39,000 $/year for conventional and unconventional classrooms, respectively. For conventional classrooms, the highest contribution is from coastal flooding (43%), followed by river flooding (37%), cyclone wind (16%) and earthquakes (3%). For unconventional classrooms, the contribution of cyclone wind is more significant and increases to 29%. Further, coastal flood is responsible for 36% of the annual damages, the riverine flood for 29% and the earthquakes for 6%.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Inter-Agency Standing Committee (RIASCO), Southern Africa
    Humanitarian Trends in Southern Africa: Challenges and Opportunities Regional Inter-Agency Standing Committeei (RIASCO), Southern Africa Humanitarian Trends in Southern Africa: Challenges and Opportunities FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT Disaster Mitigation for Sustainable Livelihoods Programme Stellenbosch University Private Bag x1 Matieland, 7602 South Africa [email protected] PLEASE CITE AS: Holloway A., Chasi V., de Waal J., Drimie S., Fortune G., Mafuleka G., Morojele M., Penicela Nhambiu B., Randrianalijaona M., Vogel C. and Zweig P. 2013. Humanitarian Trends in Southern Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Regional Interagency Standing Committee, Southern Africa. Rome, FAO. COVER IMAGE CAPTION “PRECIOUS BUNDLE: An as-yet-unnamed baby who was born on the back of a bakkie (pick- up truck) just days ago during the deluge is carried gently across the water by a farmworker” – courtesy of Antione de Ras, The Star, January 25, 2013. i The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]