Town of Shutesbury Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TOWN OF SHUTESBURY MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN DECEMBER 2014 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Prepared by: The Shutesbury Emergency Management Team Walter R. Tibbetts, Emergency Management Director Thomas Harding, Police Chief/ Deputy Director Michael Freidman, E991 Coordinator Mark Foster, Shutesbury OEM William Elliott, Board of Health Kenneth Rotondi, Board of Health Rebecca Torres, Town Administrator Elaine Puleo, Select Board Albert Springer, Select Board April Stein, Select Board Mike Vinskey, Select Board Leslie Bracebridge, Town Clerk Tim Hunting, Highway Superintendent Jacqueline Mendosa, School Principal Patrick Callahan, Public Information Officer and The Franklin Regional Council of Governments Peggy Sloan, Director of Planning & Development Kimberly Noake MacPhee, P.G., Land Use & Natural Resources Program Manager Patricia A. Smith, Senior Land Use Planner Alyssa Larose, Land Use Planner Ryan Clary, Senior GIS Specialist This project was funded by a grant received from the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) Cover photo of damage during the December 2008 ice storm courtesy of the Town of Shutesbury. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 - INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................1 Hazard Mitigation ......................................................................................................................1 Planning Process ........................................................................................................................1 2 – LOCAL PROFILE...................................................................................................................5 Community Setting ....................................................................................................................5 Infrastructure ..............................................................................................................................6 Natural Resources ......................................................................................................................6 Cultural and Historic Resources ................................................................................................9 Community Facilities and Resources.......................................................................................10 3 - HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS ...............................................................11 Hazard Identification ...............................................................................................................11 Vulnerability Assessment ........................................................................................................46 Hazard Analysis Methodology ................................................................................................68 Development Trends Analysis .................................................................................................73 4 –MITIGATION STRATEGY ..................................................................................................83 Current Mitigation Strategies ...................................................................................................83 Future Mitigation Strategies ..................................................................................................114 2014 Action Plan....................................................................................................................114 National Flood Insurance Program Compliance ....................................................................123 5 – PLAN ADOPTION & MAINTENANCE ..........................................................................127 Plan Adoption ........................................................................................................................127 Plan Maintenance Process......................................................................................................127 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................133 Appendix A: Public Participation Process ................................................................................. Appendix B: Land Use Regulations .......................................................................................... Subdivision Regulations ................................................................................. Zoning Bylaws ..................................................................................................... Appendix C: Board of Selectman Adoption and FEMA Approval of 2014 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan..................................................................................................... Shutesbury Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan i December 2014 Shutesbury Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan ii December 2014 1 - INTRODUCTION HAZARD MITIGATION The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) define Hazard Mitigation as any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and property from natural hazards such as flooding, storms, high winds, hurricanes, wildfires, earthquakes and other disasters, and man-made hazards such as hazardous material spills. Mitigation efforts undertaken by communities will help to minimize damages to buildings and infrastructure, such as water supplies, sewers, and utility transmission lines, as well as natural, cultural and historic resources. Planning efforts, like the one undertaken by the Town of Shutesbury’s Emergency Management Team (EMT) and the Franklin Regional Council of Governments (FRCOG), make mitigation a proactive process. Pre-disaster planning emphasizes actions that can be taken before a natural or man-made disaster occurs. Future property damage and loss of life can be reduced or prevented by a mitigation program that addresses the unique geography, demography, economy, and land use of a community within the context of each of the specific potential natural hazards that may threaten a community. Preparing a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan before a disaster occurs can save the community money and will facilitate post-disaster funding. Costly repairs or replacement of buildings and infrastructure, as well as the high cost of providing emergency services and rescue/recovery operations, can be avoided or significantly lessened if a community implements the mitigation measures detailed in the Plan. Many disaster assistance agencies and programs, including FEMA, require that a community adopt a pre-disaster mitigation plan as a condition for both mitigation funding and for disaster relief funding. For example, the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), the Flood Mitigation Assistance Program (FMA) and the Community Rating System (CRS), are programs with this requirement. This plan was developed with an open public involvement process. Through this process, the town’s risk and vulnerabilities to its hazards have been identified and, with the adoption of the plan, the Town will be implementing a mitigation strategy and commits to making progress towards reducing its risk for the long term. PLANNING PROCESS This plan represents the first effort by the Town of Shutesbury to plan for the mitigation of multiple hazards, natural and man-made, that pose a risk to Town and to its inhabitants. The Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning process for the Town of Shutesbury included the following tasks: Identifying the natural and man-made hazards that may impact the community, and past occurrences of hazards at the local or regional level. Shutesbury Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan 1 December 2014 Conducting a Vulnerability/Risk Assessment to identify the infrastructure (i.e., critical facilities, public buildings, roads, homes, businesses, etc.) at the highest risk for being damaged by the identified natural hazards, particularly flooding. Identifying and assessing the policies, programs, and regulations a community is currently implementing to protect against future disaster damages. Examples of such strategies include: . Preventing or limiting development in natural and man-made hazard areas like floodplains, wetlands, drinking water recharge areas, and conservation land; . Implementing recommendations in planning documents including Stormwater Management Plans, Master Plans, Open Space and Recreation Plans, Emergency/Evacuation Plans that address the impacts of natural and man-made hazards; . Requiring or encouraging the use of specific structural requirements for new buildings such as buried utilities, flood-proofed structures, and lightening grounding systems; Identifying deficiencies in the current strategies and establish goals for updating, revising or adopting new strategies; and Identification of specific projects that will mitigate the risk to public safety and damages to infrastructure from hazards. Adopting and implementing the final Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan. The planning process for the Town of Shutesbury also incorporated the following procedures: Providing an opportunity for the public to comment on the plan during the drafting and prior to the approval of the plan. Publicity was done with a press release in the Shutesbury Community Newsletter in [fill in date], as well as through flyers posted in town throughout the planning process. A copy of the draft plan was available to the public at the Town Hall, at the M. N. Spear Memorial Library, and on the Town website at www.shutesbury.org.