DOCSLIB.ORG

Progressive Consumption

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Progressive Consumption Litho X Tax cover 4/17/12 11:17 AM Page 1 CARROLL, VIARD PROGRESSIVE CONSUMPTION TAXATION PROGRESSIVE “Progressive Consumption Taxation carefully lays out the rationale for adopting a progressive Progressive Consumption Taxation Progressive consumption tax system in the United States and shows how such a system can be adopted. Carroll and Viard provide the motivating ‘big picture’ arguments but also tackle the many thorny details that confront this tax reform, including the appropriate treatment of financial intermediaries, international transactions, and transition from the income tax. The book is ONSUMPTION accessible to those with a policy interest, but it will also enlighten tax experts.” CONSUMPTION —Alan J. Auerbach, University of California, Berkeley “Although consumption-type taxes like the Flat Tax and FairTax are beloved by GOP presi- dential candidates, they have never won political traction because they are widely perceived as unfair. Bob Carroll and Alan Viard take fairness considerations seriously and explain how TAXATION a modern version of the X Tax could address them while preserving the efficiency advan- tages of a consumption tax. The book provides a comprehensive and accessible analysis of progressive consumption taxation and should be on the reading list of anyone interested in fundamental tax reform.” —Leonard E. Burman, Syracuse University and the Urban Institute The X Tax Revisited Robert Carroll is a principal with Ernst & Young LLP’s Quantitative Economics and Statis- tics group. Previously, he was deputy assistant secretary for tax analysis at the U.S. Treasury Department, a visiting scholar with the Congressional Budget Office, and a senior econo- mist with the President’s Council of Economic Advisers. Alan D. Viard is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. Previously, he was a senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and an assistant professor of economics at Ohio State University. He also was a visiting scholar at the Treasury Department Office of Tax Analysis, a senior economist with the President’s Council of Economic Advisers, and a staff economist with the Joint Committee on Taxation. ROBERT CARROLL ISBN-13: 978-084474394-3 ISBN-10: 084474394-1 ALAN D. VIARD Progressive Consumption Taxation CCarroll-Viard.indbarroll-Viard.indb i 44/17/12/17/12 99:52:52 AMAM CCarroll-Viard.indbarroll-Viard.indb iiii 44/17/12/17/12 99:52:52 AMAM Progressive Consumption Taxation The X Tax Revisited Robert Carroll Alan D. Viard The AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute WASHINGTON, D.C. CCarroll-Viard.indbarroll-Viard.indb iiiiii 44/17/12/17/12 99:52:52 AMAM Distributed by arrangement with the Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706. To order, call toll free 1-800-462-6420 or 1-717-794-3800. For all other inquiries, please contact AEI Press, 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036, or call 1-800-862-5801. NATIONAL RESEARCH NRI INITIATIVE This publication is a project of the National Research Initiative, a program of the American Enterprise Institute that is designed to support, publish, and disseminate research by university-based scholars and other independent researchers who are engaged in the exploration of important public policy issues. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Carroll, Robert. Progressive consumption taxation : the X tax revisited / Robert Carroll and Alan D. Viard. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8447-4394-3 (cloth)—ISBN 0-8447-4394-1 (cloth)— ISBN 978-0-8447-4395-0 (pbk.)—ISBN 0-8447-4395-X (pbk.)— ISBN 978-0-8447-4396-7 (ebook)—ISBN 0-8447-4396-8 (ebook) 1. Spendings tax—United States. 2. Value-added tax—United States. I. Viard, Alan D. II. Title. HJ5715.U6C28 2012 336.2’7140973—dc23 2011050811 © 2012 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Wash- ington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not neces- sarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. Printed in the United States of America CCarroll-Viard.indbarroll-Viard.indb iviv 44/17/12/17/12 99:52:52 AMAM Contents LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xi INTRODUCTION 1 1. WHY TAX CONSUMPTION? 6 Removing the Income Tax Penalty on Saving 6 Gains from Reform 10 Consumption-Tax Features in the Current Income Tax System 14 Conclusion 17 Box: The Trade-off Fallacy 18 2. THE CASE FOR THE X TAX 20 The Retail Sales Tax and the Value-Added Tax 20 The Two-Part VAT 24 The X Tax: A Progressive Two-Part VAT 29 Comparing the X Tax to the Personal Expenditures Tax 33 Conclusion 39 Box: Optics of the X Tax and the PET 39 3. MAINTAINING PROGRESSIVITY 40 Tax Rate Schedule 40 Assessing the Distributional Effects of the X Tax 45 Conclusion 50 Box: Zero Revenue from Taxation of Risky Returns 51 4. FRINGE BENEFITS AND TRANSFER PAYMENTS 53 Fringe Benefits 53 Financing Social Security and Medicare 56 Public and Private Transfer Payments 59 Conclusion 65 Box: Taxation of Gambling 66 v CCarroll-Viard.indbarroll-Viard.indb v 44/17/12/17/12 99:52:52 AMAM vi PROGRESSIVE CONSUMPTION TAXATION 5. BUSINESS FIRMS 68 General Issues 68 Distinguishing Wages from Business Cash Flow 72 Firms with Negative Business Cash Flows 74 Conclusion 80 6. FINANCIAL SERVICES 81 Neutral Tax Treatment 81 The Problem of Mislabeled Transactions 82 The Search for a Solution 87 The R+F Cash-Flow Method 92 Accounting Methods 98 Special Cases 100 Conclusion 101 7. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS 102 The Border Adjustment Question 102 The “Competitiveness” Illusion 104 Giving Wealth Away without Really Trying 109 Above-Normal Returns and Transfer Pricing 111 Other Cross-Border Issues 115 Conclusion 115 Box: Border Adjustment with Fixed Exchange Rates 116 8. THE TRANSITION 118 Transition Burden on Existing Capital 118 Normative Issues 124 Outline of a Transition Policy 128 Macroeconomic Policy During the Transition 134 Conclusion 134 9. THE NONBUSINESS SECTOR 135 Owner-Occupied Housing and Consumer Durables 135 Production by Governments, Nonprofits, and Households 145 Patrolling the Boundaries of the Business Cash-Flow Tax 148 Fiscal Federalism under the X Tax 151 Conclusion 153 Box: Taxation of Home Resales 154 CCarroll-Viard.indbarroll-Viard.indb vivi 44/17/12/17/12 99:52:52 AMAM CONTENTS vii 10. THE VAT ALTERNATIVE 156 Subtraction and Credit-Invoice VATs 156 The Superiority of the VAT to the Retail Sales Tax 159 Recent Discussion of VAT 161 Using the VAT to Replace Other Taxes 163 The “Easy” Stuff 164 Monetary Policy and Other Transition Issues 166 Governments and Nonprofits 171 Implications for Social Security 172 Combating the “Money Machine” 174 Conclusion 177 CONCLUSION 178 NOTES 181 REFERENCES 185 INDEX 195 ABOUT THE AUTHORS 207 CCarroll-Viard.indbarroll-Viard.indb viivii 44/17/12/17/12 99:52:52 AMAM CCarroll-Viard.indbarroll-Viard.indb viiiviii 44/17/12/17/12 99:52:52 AMAM List of Illustrations Figures 2-1 Four Ways to Tax Consumption 23 3-1 Distribution of the Federal Income Tax Burden under 2015 Law and under the 2005 Tax Panel’s Progressive Consumption Tax Plan, by Income Percentile 41 Tables 3-1 Distribution of the Tax Burden by Household Income and Household Net Worth 48 6-1 Taxation of Bank Transaction under Alternative Tax Systems 84 8-1 Stocks of Credits, Net Operating Losses, and Remaining Basis Carried into Tax Year 2013 129 10-1 Different but Economically Equivalent Ways to Tax Consumption 158 ix CCarroll-Viard.indbarroll-Viard.indb ixix 44/17/12/17/12 99:52:52 AMAM CCarroll-Viard.indbarroll-Viard.indb x 44/17/12/17/12 99:52:52 AMAM Acknowledgments This book could not have been written without the financial support of the American Enterprise Institute’s National Research Initiative. We are grateful to the NRI board—Christopher DeMuth, Kim Dennis, and the late James Q. Wilson—for approving this project. We thank NRI director Henry Olsen for his patient and steadfast encouragement of our work. We are grateful to Alan Auerbach, Leonard Burman, Alex Brill, Julie Anne Cronin, Jane Gravelle, Chad Hill, J. Andrew Hipolit, Emily Lin, Jay Mackie, Susan Nelson, Thomas Neubig, Jim Nunns, Laura Power, Amy Roden, Jason Saving, Dan Shaviro, Andrew Smith, Eric Toder, David Weis- bach, and George Yin for helpful comments and to Matt Knittel for provid- ing data. We also thank Laura Harbold for her thorough and diligent work on this manuscript. xi CCarroll-Viard.indbarroll-Viard.indb xixi 44/17/12/17/12 99:52:52 AMAM CCarroll-Viard.indbarroll-Viard.indb xiixii 44/17/12/17/12 99:52:52 AMAM Introduction The United States is alone among industrialized countries in having no broad-based consumption tax at the federal level. Yet, as we will explain in chapter 1, economic analysis reveals that consumption taxation has an economic advantage, relative to income taxation, because it does not penal- ize saving and investment. In recent years, a number of proposals to adopt some type of consumption tax have been advanced. As revenue needs increase due to the growth of Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security in future decades, there is likely to be renewed interest in finding better ways to raise revenue, prompting further consideration of consumption taxes. Several concerns have blocked a move to consumption taxation, how- ever. On the key question of whether a consumption tax should replace all, or only part, of the income tax system, each approach has drawn strong objections.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Creating Market Incentives for Greener Products Policy Manual for Eastern Partnership Countries
    Creating Market Incentives for Greener Products Policy Manual for Eastern Partnership Countries Creating Incentives for Greener Products Policy Manual for Eastern Partnership Countries 2014 About the OECD The OECD is a unique forum where governments work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Union takes part in the work of the OECD. Since the 1990s, the OECD Task Force for the Implementation of the Environmental Action Programme (the EAP Task Force) has been supporting countries of Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia to reconcile their environment and economic goals. About the EaP GREEN programme The “Greening Economies in the European Union’s Eastern Neighbourhood” (EaP GREEN) programme aims to support the six Eastern Partnership countries to move towards green economy by decoupling economic growth from environmental degradation and resource depletion. The six EaP countries are: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Republic of Moldova and Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Denmark Ecotax Rates Green Budget Germany (Gbg)
    DENMARK ECOTAX RATES GREEN BUDGET GERMANY (GBG) EFR in Denmark: General Tax- Tax rate national cur- Tax rate – Name Typ Specific Tax-Base Base rency Euro € Denmark Waste manage- Charge on batte- ment - individual Lead batteries - car 1.61 € per ries Fee/Charge products batteries < 100 Ah 12.00 DKK per unit. unit. Waste manage- Charge on batte- ment - individual Lead batteries - car 3.23 € per ries Fee/Charge products batteries > 100 Ah 24.00 DKK per unit. unit. Waste manage- Charge on batte- ment - individual 2.42 € per ries Fee/Charge products Lead batteries - other 18.00 DKK per unit. unit. Waste manage- 33.6 - Charge on ha- ment - individual 250 - 88,000 DKK 11828 € zardous waste Fee/Charge products Hazardous waste per tonne per tonne. 185.20 € per Charge on mu- household nicipal waste 1378.00 DKK per per year collection / Waste manage- household per year on aver- treatment Fee/Charge ment - in general Municipal waste on average age. 2.20 € per Charge on sewa- Management of 16.40 DKK per m3 m3 on a- ge discharge Fee/Charge water resources Water consumption on average verage Duty on carrier Waste manage- bags made of pa- ment - individual Carrier bags made of 1.34 € pr per, plastics, etc. Tax products paper 10.00 DKK pr kg kg. Duty on carrier Waste manage- bags made of pa- ment - individual Carrier bags made of 2.96 € pr per, plastics, etc. Tax products plastics 22.00 DKK pr kg kg. 0.27 € per kg net Duty on certain 2.00 DKK per kg net weight of chlorinated sol- Hazardous che- weight of the sub- the sub- vents Tax micals Dichloromethane stance.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Acquainted with VAT (C) Tax Analysts 2011
    Introduction: Getting Acquainted With VAT (C) Tax Analysts 2011. All rights reserved. does not claim copyright in any public domain or third party content. By Martin A. Sullivan Martin A. Sullivan is a contributing editor to Tax Analysts. Until recently, most talk about a value added tax in the United States was an academic exercise. Policy experts kept telling anyone who would listen that we could boost our competitive- ness if some form of a VAT was used to replace all, or at least the worst parts, of our clunky income tax. But there was no pressing need for a VAT and no political incentive to undertake the arduous task of orchestrating a major tax reform. But times are changing. Between the 2007 and 2010 fiscal years, the national debt increased from 36 percent to 62 percent of gross national product. And matters are only getting worse. America is relentlessly moving toward the edge of a fiscal abyss. In Wash- ington, while our leaders may talk tough, they are not taking action. To avoid upsetting voters, they are careful not to even hint at spending cuts or tax increases of the size needed to make a real dent in the problem. With no limit on the national credit card, the daily push and pull of politics continues unhindered by the impending crisis. Our system of checks and balances and the usual political gridlock are partly to blame. Also part of the mix is our national mental block about the federal debt. The tough choices that must be made are outside the scope of current political discourse.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Taxpayer Burden Survey Internal Revenue Service
    Business Taxpayer Burden Survey Internal Revenue Service sampleonly For use Your experience matters to us. BTB <Wave#> <WesID> IRS Business Taxpayer Burden Survey The purpose of this survey is to provide Congress and the President with accurate estimates of the costs incurred by business taxpayers in complying with federal tax rules and regulations as well as to inform tax administrators and policy makers regarding opportunities to reduce and otherwise manage these costs. Please be assured that you will not be asked about the income or other financial details of your business’ tax return. This questionnaire relates to the activities associated with the preparation and filing of your 2009 federal income tax return and any other tax returns (i.e., employment, excise, information returns, state and local, etc.) filed for the same period. This includes any filings completed in the 12 months leading up to the filing of your business’ 2009 federal income tax return. The individual most responsible for maintaining the financial records for your business or making the financial and tax-related decisions for your business should complete this questionnaire. You may need to consult with others in your organization to complete the survey and we encourage you to do so. This survey includes questions regarding the following content areas: Tax Preparation Methods and Activities Tax-related Recordkeeping Gathering Materials, Learning About Tax Law, and Using IRS Taxpayer Services Tax Form Completion Tax Department Personnel and Budget Time Associated with Tax Compliance Allocation of Time Burden Across Tax Compliance Activities Allocation of Time Burden Across Type of Employee Fees Associated with Tax Compliance Demographics Please be assured that your responsessample will be used for research and aggregate reporting purposes only and will not be used for other non-statistical or non-researchonly purposes such as direct enforcement activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecotaxes: a Comparative Study of India and China
    Ecotaxes: A Comparative Study of India and China Rajat Verma ISBN 978-81-7791-209-8 © 2016, Copyright Reserved The Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC) is engaged in interdisciplinary research in analytical and applied areas of the social sciences, encompassing diverse aspects of development. ISEC works with central, state and local governments as well as international agencies by undertaking systematic studies of resource potential, identifying factors influencing growth and examining measures for reducing poverty. The thrust areas of research include state and local economic policies, issues relating to sociological and demographic transition, environmental issues and fiscal, administrative and political decentralization and governance. It pursues fruitful contacts with other institutions and scholars devoted to social science research through collaborative research programmes, seminars, etc. The Working Paper Series provides an opportunity for ISEC faculty, visiting fellows and PhD scholars to discuss their ideas and research work before publication and to get feedback from their peer group. Papers selected for publication in the series present empirical analyses and generally deal with wider issues of public policy at a sectoral, regional or national level. These working papers undergo review but typically do not present final research results, and constitute works in progress. ECOTAXES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDIA AND CHINA1 Rajat Verma2 Abstract This paper attempts to compare various forms of ecotaxes adopted by India and China in order to reduce their carbon emissions by 2020 and to address other environmental issues. The study contributes to the literature by giving a comprehensive definition of ecotaxes and using it to analyse the status of these taxes in India and China.
    [Show full text]
  • International Trade, National Treatment, and Domestic Regulation Author(S): Robert W
    The University of Chicago The University of Chicago Law School International Trade, National Treatment, and Domestic Regulation Author(s): Robert W. Staiger and Alan O. Sykes Source: The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 40, No. 1 (January 2011), pp. 149-203 Published by: The University of Chicago Press for The University of Chicago Law School Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/658402 . Accessed: 28/09/2011 12:58 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press, The University of Chicago, The University of Chicago Law School are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Legal Studies. http://www.jstor.org International Trade, National Treatment, and Domestic Regulation Robert W. Staiger and Alan O. Sykes Existing formal models of the relationship between trade policy and regulatory policy suggest the potential for a regulatory race to the bottom. World Trade Organization (WTO) rules and disputes, however, center on complaints about excessively stringent regulations. This paper bridges the gap between the existing formal literature and the actual pattern of rules and disputes. Employing the terms-of-trade framework for the modeling of trade agreements, we show how “large” nations may have an incentive to impose discriminatory product standards against imported goods once border instruments are constrained and how inefficiently strin- gent standards may emerge under certain circumstances even if regulatory discrimination is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumption Taxation
    74 Consumption taxation Consumption taxation interest, debt repayment). This approach is often characterized as the R (for real transactions) base Gilbert E. Metcalf approach, a terminology credited to Meade (Institute Tufts University for Fiscal Studies 1973). Alternatively, one can in- clude all financial transactions (R + F base). Thus, Taxation based on consumption, as opposed all cash proceeds are included as taxable income, to some other measure of ability to pay, and all cash outflows are deducted. So long as the most notably income. same tax rate applies to all transactions, these two approaches generate the same tax consequences to a Forms of consumption taxes firm. The present discounted value of taxes paid on proceeds from borrowing, for example, should just To understand the different ways in which con- equal the present discounted value of taxes saved by sumption taxes can be implemented, it is useful to deducting principal and interest on that debt. The begin with the Haig-Simons definition of income: R + F approach is better suited for use in taxing income (Y ) equals consumption (C ) plus changes in financial services where value added is difficult to wealth (W ) (Y = C + ∆W ) . First, note that the key disentangle from financial activities (borrowing and difference between income and consumption taxa- lending). tion is the inclusion or exclusion of ∆W in the tax As an accounting identity, value added is allo- base. Changes in wealth—or savings—are not taxed cated to workers (wages) and capital owners (divi- by consumption taxes but are taxed by income taxes. dends and retained earnings).
    [Show full text]
  • Consumption Taxes
    A conversation with Alan D. Viard on March 25th, 2014 Participants • Alan D. Viard – Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute • Alexander Berger – Senior Research Analyst, GiveWell Note: This set of notes was compiled by GiveWell and gives an overview of the major points made by Dr. Viard. Summary GiveWell spoke with Alan D. Viard, Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), about fundamental tax reform, particularly the benefits and drawbacks of various types of consumption taxes. Consumption taxes A consumption tax is a tax on spending as opposed to income. Consumption taxation is theoretical appealing because, unlike the income tax, it does not disincentivize investment and saving. Under an income tax, both invested money and the return on invested money are taxed, meaning that income that is invested is ultimately taxed more heavily than income spent immediately. By taxing money when it is spent, a consumption tax avoids this problem and encourages greater capital growth. Dynamic simulation models suggest that a switch to a consumption tax might increase overall economic output by several percentage points in the long run. Several types of consumption tax have been proposed. A value-added tax (VAT), somewhat like a sales tax, uses a flat tax structure. The X tax is a progressive consumption tax that taxes businesses on value-added minus wages and individuals on wages. The personal expenditure tax (PET) is a progressive tax on household expenditures which eliminates business taxes altogether. Value-added tax (VAT) A VAT is a tax on the value added to a product at each stage of its manufacture and on its final sale to the consumer.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Taxation in Europe: Let's Get It Together! Willem Pieter De Groen 16 February 2015
    Corporate Taxation in Europe: Let's get it together! Willem Pieter de Groen 16 February 2015 More comprehensive cooperation in corporate taxation at European level could significantly advance the region’s socio-economic prosperity, but its potential contribution is unfortunately overlooked in the current search for growth and job creation. Lucrative tax niches established in some member states and the fear of losing fiscal autonomy prevent several countries from accepting the move towards an EU single market for taxation. If ‘Lux leaks’ and other tax avoidance and evasion revelations succeed in changing the dominant attitudes in the European tax debate, what steps need to be taken to allow tax policy to play a positive role in promoting economic prosperity? ux leaks has placed the issue of corporate tax avoidance and evasion once again on the political agenda. In November 2014, the International Consortium of Investigative LJournalists1 unveiled the secret tax deals struck by about 350 multinational companies with the Luxembourg authorities, which allowed them to reduce their corporate income tax (CIT) bill. The companies used mismatches in the tax systems as well as deals with the authorities to reduce both the effective tax rate and the base. Lux leaks is not the first and is unlikely to be the last tax-avoidance scandal. It followed the public outrage provoked two years earlier in the United Kingdom over reports that the US coffee shop chain Starbucks had substantially reduced its tax bill by paying royalties to its regional headquarters in the Netherlands, which has a regime with low rates on royalties.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservatism and the Quest for Community
    Conservatism and the Quest for Community William Schambra he age of obama has been an age of revival for the Progressive Tideal of a “national community.” It is a vision rooted in two core beliefs: that direct, local associations and channels of action are too often overwhelmed by the differences among communities and the fractious character of American public life; and that rather than strengthening the sources of these differences, modern government should seek to overcome them in the service of a coherent national ambition. By dis- tributing the same benefits, protections, and services to all Americans, fellow feeling and neighborliness can be fostered among the public; combined with the power of the national government and professional expertise, this communal sentiment can then become a valuable weapon for attacking America’s most pressing social problems. A century ago, this ideal was a central tenet of the Progressive agenda — which sought, as Progressive icon Herbert Croly put it in 1909, the “subordination of the individual to the demand of a dominant and constructive national purpose.” It was an important goal of the New Deal, which President Franklin Roosevelt described in 1933 as “extending to our national life the old principle of the local community.” It was the essence of the liberal agenda of the 1960s, which President Lyndon Johnson called an effort to “turn unity of interest into unity of purpose, and unity of goals into unity in the Great Society.” And it was at the core of Barack Obama’s campaign for the presidency in 2008, which promised to over- come petty differences and, as Obama put it in one campaign speech, to Wil l i a m Sch a m br a is the director of the Hudson Institute’s Bradley Center for Philanthropy and Civic Renewal.
    [Show full text]
  • Commenting on the Issues of the Moment
    Conversations with Bill Kristol Guest: Yuval Levin, National Affairs Taped July 29, 2014 Table of Contents I: National Affairs 0:15 – 13:45 II: Working in the White House 13:45 – 29:41 III: Battling Bureaucracy 29:41 – 45:28 IV: Burke and Modern Conservatism 45:28 – 1:04:26 V: Political Philosophy and Politics 1:04:26 – 1:18:02 I: National Affairs (0:15 – 13:45) KRISTOL: Welcome back to CONVERSATIONS. Our guest today is Yuval Levin, policy analyst, policy practitioner, a former White House staffer. And among other things, now editor of the very fine journal, National Affairs. What is National Affairs? Why National Affairs? LEVIN: Well, thank you. National Affairs is a quarterly journal of essays on domestic policy and political thought – political ideas. It tries to sit at the intersection of policy – concrete policy – and political theory and political thought. It exists really because in the wake of the 2008 elections, after a series of conversations among people on the right, including you, among others, we came to the view that one of the things that were missing on the right was a venue for people to think out loud in a serious way, both about policy ideas where the policy agenda seemed to be a little empty, and about political ideas about how, about what conservatism should mean in the 21st century and how that might apply to people’s lives. And we had a clear model. The model really was The Public Interest, which had run for 40 years and which had shut down about five years before that.
    [Show full text]
  • United States: National Affairs, Anti-Semitism
    United States National Affairs TheBush administration began the year buoyed by the results of the November 2004 elections: the president's decisive reelection and a strong Republican showing in the congressional races in which the party, already in control of both houses, gained four seats in the Senate and three in the House. The president promised to spend the "political capi- tal" he had earned on an agenda that included Social Security reform, tax cuts, and the continuation of an aggressive global war on terror. The organized Jewish community, meanwhile, geared up for another four years of an administration strongly allied with most Jews on Israel's defense needs, defiantly committed to an increasingly complicated and controversial war in Iraq, and diverging sharply from the majority of American Jews on many domestic issues. THE POLITICAL ARENA olected President Ldent Bush won immediate praise from Jewish leaders for his intment of Judge Michael Chertoff, the son of a rabbi, as secretary meland security. Chertoff had been a widely respected prosecutor hen chief of the Justice Department's criminal division before be- a judge on the Third Circuit of the U.S. Court ofAppeals. He jominated for his new post on January 11 and confirmed by the e on February 15. Another appointment of a prominent Jew was )f Elliott Abrams, who had held a variety of government positions, deputy assistant to the president and deputy national security )ther presidential appointments were generally applauded by the ommunity. Condoleezza Rice, seen as a friend of Israel, moved ional security advisor to secretary of state.
    [Show full text]