Newsletter, Vol 29 No 1, Summer 1998
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Dartmouth College Case Symposium Presenters March 1-2, 2019 Akhil Reed Amar Thomas Barnico
Dartmouth College Case Symposium Presenters March 1-2, 2019 Akhil Reed Amar Sterling Professor of Law Yale Law School Professor Akhil Reed Amar teaches constitutional law in both Yale College and Yale Law School. After graduating from Yale College, summa cum laude, in 1980 and from Yale Law School in 1984, and clerking for then Judge (now Justice) Stephen Breyer, Amar joined the Yale faculty in 1985 at the age of 26. His work has won awards from both the American Bar Association and the Federalist Society, and he has been cited by Supreme Court justices across the spectrum in more than three dozen cases—tops in his generation. He regularly testifies before Congress at the invitation of both parties; and in surveys of judicial citations and/or scholarly citations, he invariably ranks among America’s five most-cited mid-career legal scholars. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a recipient of the American Bar Foundation’s Outstanding Scholar Award. In 2008 he received the DeVane Medal—Yale’s highest award for teaching excellence. He has written widely for popular publications, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Time, and The Atlantic. He was an informal consultant to the popular TV show, The West Wing, and his constitutional scholarship has been showcased on a wide range of broadcasts, including The Colbert Report, Up with Chris Hayes, Tucker Carlson Tonight, Morning Joe, AC360, Your World with Neil Cavuto, 11th Hour with Brian Williams, Fox News @Night with Shannon Bream, Fareed Zakaria GPS, Erin Burnett Outfront, and Constitution USA with Peter Sagal. -
1999-2000 Supreme Court Preview: Speakers Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School
College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Supreme Court Preview Conferences, Events, and Lectures 1999 1999-2000 Supreme Court Preview: Speakers Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School Repository Citation Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School, "1999-2000 Supreme Court Preview: Speakers" (1999). Supreme Court Preview. 108. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview/108 Copyright c 1999 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview 1999-2000 Supreme Court Preview Who's Who On The Panel AKHIL REED AMAR is Southmayd Professor of Law at Yale Law School where he teaches courses in constitutional law, federal jurisdiction, and criminal procedure. A frequent contributor to the New Republic, Professor Amar is the author of three books: The Bill of Rghts: Creation and Reconstruction (1998), For the People (with A. Hirsch) (1997), and The Constitution and Criminal Procedure: FirstPrinciles (1996). Professor Amar also served as clerk to the Honorable Stephen Breyer of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. CHARLES BIERBAUER, CNN's senior Washington correspondent, covers the Supreme Court as well as critical public policy issues including the federal budget, tax reform, and health care. In addition to his domestic expertise, he has 12 years experience as an international journalist. Bierbauer joined CNN after serving with ABC News as the network's bureau chief and correspondent in Moscow and Bonn from 1978 to 1981. Bierbauer received an Emmy for his role as anchor of CNN's coverage of the 1996 bombing of Olympic Park in Atlanta. -
Rodney A. Smolla
RODNEY A. SMOLLA Education and Professional Positions Rod Smolla is the Dean of the School of Law at Washington and Lee University. He was previously the Dean and Allen Professor at the University of Richmond School of Law. Prior to that he was the Arthur B. Hanson Professor of Law at the College of William and Mary, Marshall-Wythe School of Law. From 1988 to 1996 he was Director of the Institute of Bill of Rights Law at William and Mary. He graduated from Yale in 1975 and Duke Law School in 1978, where he was first in his class. He then served as law clerk to Judge Charles Clark on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. After practicing law in Chicago at Mayer, Brown, and Platt, he entered academic life. He has been a Professor at the University of Illinois, University of Arkansas, and DePaul University Law Schools, a Senior Fellow of the Washington Annenberg Program of Northwestern University, and a visiting Professor at the University of Melbourne, Duke University, Indiana University, and University of Denver Law Schools. Scholarship and Writing Rod Smolla is an accomplished author. His writing interests are eclectic, including law review scholarship, law school casebooks, legal treatises, university press books, trade books published for general audiences, magazine and newspaper articles, on-line publications, and fiction, including short stories and plays. Dean Smolla is the author or co-author of many books. His book Free Speech in an Open Society (Alfred A. Knopf 1992) won the William O. Douglas Award as the year’s best monograph on freedom of expression. -
May 2012 June Quarterly Meeting and Luncheon 22 Seminars Available at Bench-Bar at Revel in A.C
Philadelphia ® The Monthly Newspaper of the Philadelphia Bar Association Vol. 41, No. 5 May 2012 JUNE QUARTERLY MEETING AND LUNCHEON 22 Seminars Available at Bench-Bar at Revel in A.C. n By Jeff Lyons More than 20 CLE Seminars are planned for the 2012 Bench-Bar & An- nual Conference on Oct. 5-6 at the new oceanfront Revel in Atlantic City, N.J. The Bench-Bar & Annual Conference provides attendees with the opportunity to earn CLE credit while networking with colleagues and members of the bench. Hundreds of attorneys and judges are expected to attend. The Family Law Section and State Civil Litigation are each planning two seminars for the Bench-Bar. Other sec- Photo by Jeff Lyons tions and committees planning semi- Women in the Profession Committee Co-Chairs Emily B. Marks (left) and Lauren P. McKenna present flowers to former nars include Diversity in the Profession Chancellor Jane Leslie Dalton, who will receive the Sandra Day O’Connor Award at the June Quarterly Meeting. Committee, Advancing Civics Education Committee, Bar-News Media Commit- Penn’s Berry to Present Jane Dalton to Receive tee, Women in the Profession Commit- tee, Workers’ Compensation Section, Higginbotham Lecture O’Connor Award June 26 continued on page 17 n By Jeff Lyons n By Jeff Lyons In This Issue Dr. Mary Frances Berry, former Jane Leslie Dalton, who has served as Chancellor, chair chair of the U.S. Commission on Civil of the Board of Governors and co-chair of the Women in the 3 Helping Veterans Rights, will deliver the Judge A. -
2020-2022 Law School Catalog
The University of at Austin Law School Catalog 2020-2022 Table of Contents Examinations ..................................................................................... 11 Grades and Minimum Performance Standards ............................... 11 Introduction ................................................................................................ 2 Registration on the Pass/Fail Basis ......................................... 11 Board of Regents ................................................................................ 2 Minimum Performance Standards ............................................ 11 Officers of the Administration ............................................................ 2 Honors ............................................................................................... 12 General Information ................................................................................... 3 Graduation ......................................................................................... 12 Mission of the School of Law ............................................................ 3 Degrees ..................................................................................................... 14 Statement on Equal Educational Opportunity ................................... 3 Doctor of Jurisprudence ................................................................... 14 Facilities .............................................................................................. 3 Curriculum ................................................................................. -
2012-2013 Supreme Court Preview: Schedule and Panel Members Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School
College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Supreme Court Preview Conferences, Events, and Lectures 2012 2012-2013 Supreme Court Preview: Schedule and Panel Members Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School Repository Citation Institute of Bill of Rights Law at the William & Mary Law School, "2012-2013 Supreme Court Preview: Schedule and Panel Members" (2012). Supreme Court Preview. 15. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview/15 Copyright c 2012 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/preview 2012-2013 Supreme Court Preview Schedule of Events Friday, September 28,2012 WELCOME 5:00 PM MOOT COURT 5:05 to 6:05 PM BREAK 6:05 to 6:15 PM MOOT COURT DISCUSSION 6:15 to 6:30 PM ROBERTS COURT 6:35 to 7:25 PM Saturday, September 29, 2012 ELECTION LAW 9:00 to 9:50 AM INTERNATIONAL LAW 9:55 to 10:45 AM BREAK 10:45 to 11 :00 AM BUSINESS 11:00 to 11:50 AM LUNCH BREAKOUT SESSIONS 12:00 to 1:45 PM 1. IMPLICATIONS OF THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT DECISION 2. THE SUPREME COURT AND THE 2012 ELECTION 3. THE CONSERVATIVE LEGAL MOVEMENT AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM CRIMINAL 2:00 to 2:50 PM GAY RIGHTS 2:55 to 3:45 PM CONFERENCE CONCLUDES 3:45 PM xii 2012-2013 Supreme Court Preview Panel Members DEBO P. ADEGBILE is the Acting President and Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. -
CQR Drinking Water Safety
Published by CQ Press, an Imprint of SAGE Publications, Inc. www.cqresearcher.com Drinking Water Safety Can the nation’s aging water infrastructure be fixed? hile water-quality experts deem most of the nation’s drinking water safe, the recent crisis over lead-tainted water in Flint, Mich., W dramatized the problems that plague com - munities nationwide: Lead and other toxic substances continue to pose a threat, and government agencies responsible for monitoring water safety sometimes fail to protect the public. Investigations conducted since the Flint crisis came to light last year have found that thousands of water systems nationwide have failed to meet federal safety standards for lead and other harmful substances. Demonstrators march for clean water in Flint, Mich., on Feb. 19, 2016. After learning the city’s water Moreover, environmentalists warn that tens of thousands of indus - contained dangerous lead levels, local officials waited seven months to tell the public. Lead- contaminated water has been found in trial pollutants and pharmaceutical compounds slip through water- thousands of communities throughout the country. treatment systems without being tested or regulated. The Environ - mental Protection Agency sets water-safety standards, but the sourcing, treatment and distribution of water is left to local utilities, I some dealing with polluted water sources, old pipes or shrinking THIS REPORT N THE ISSUES ....................579 budgets. Cost estimates to fix the aging U.S. water infrastructure S BACKGROUND ................586 -
Analysis of the International Debate on the Right to Peace in the Context of the Human Rights and Intergovernmental Bodies of the United Nations
Analysis of the international debate on the right to peace in the context of the human rights and intergovernmental bodies of the United Nations “Analysis of the international debate on the right to peace in the context of the human rights and intergovernmental bodies of the United Nations” Mr. David Fernández Puyana Doctoral thesis UPF/2014 Tutor: Dr. Santiago Ripol Carulla (Professor of international law at the University of Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona) 1 Analysis of the international debate on the right to peace in the context of the human rights and intergovernmental bodies of the United Nations Acknowledgments The enforcement and promotion of world peace requires the collective effort of many people, and the same is true for this doctoral thesis. I would like to express my deepest appreciation to all the people and NGOs who have wholeheartedly supported the process in favour of the recognition of peace as a human right of all individuals and all peoples. I am most indebted to Ambassador Christian Guillermet-Fernández, Chairperson- Rapporteur of the Intergovernmental Open Ended Working Group on the right to peace at the Human Rights Council, who trusted me to assist him on the legal field during my tenure as a member of the dynamic team of the Permanent Mission of Costa Rica to the United Nations in Geneva. I benefited greatly from the edition process carried out by Donna Perry, the University of Massachusetts, Worcester (USA). Especially valuable was the support and friendship of Jussi Ojala, Elina Korhonen and Aaro Rytkönen (Finnish Church Aid), Christina Papazoglou (World Council of Churches) and Jaime Aranzadi, Miguel Bose and Juanes (Foundation Peace without Borders). -
Conflicting Laws in a Common Market? the NAFTA Experiment
Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 76 Issue 3 Symposium on the Structures of Care Article 16 Work April 2001 Conflicting Laws in a Common Market? The NAFTA Experiment H. Patrick Glenn Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation H. P. Glenn, Conflicting Laws in a Common Market? The NAFTA Experiment, 76 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1789 (2001). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol76/iss3/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. CONFLICTING LAWS IN A COMMON MARKET? THE NAFTA EXPERIMENT H. PATRICK GLENN* Globalization, it has recently been said, means the end not of history, but of geography, in the sense of the importance of geophysical boundaries.1 Like most statements on globalization, this one is also an exaggeration. Yet many close and familiar boundaries have recently declined in importance, whether they are geophysical, political, or legal.2 Regionalization is an important part of this process, since we define the new regions not so much in terms of geophysical boundaries, though in a large sense they are still present, but in terms of new political and legal boundaries that surpass those of the state. The European Union and the North American Free Trade Agreement ("NAFTA") 3 are only two examples of contemporary regionalization, yet they illustrate the diversity of structures it may represent. -
Socal Justice and Comprehensive Law Practices: Three Washington State Examples
Seattle Journal for Social Justice Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 22 November 2006 Socal Justice and Comprehensive Law Practices: Three Washington State Examples Heather E. Williams Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj Recommended Citation Williams, Heather E. (2006) "Socal Justice and Comprehensive Law Practices: Three Washington State Examples," Seattle Journal for Social Justice: Vol. 5 : Iss. 1 , Article 22. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj/vol5/iss1/22 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications and Programs at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Seattle Journal for Social Justice by an authorized editor of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 411 Social Justice and Comprehensive Law Practices: Three Washington State Examples Heather E. Williams1 “[D]issatisfaction is not inevitable.”2 Our courts have a very tough job. Scholars and citizens may disagree over whether our courts and legal processes are, at best, inefficient or, at worst, broken; but it is safe to say that there is a large degree of dissatisfaction. Still, judicial systems at the tribal, state, and federal levels accomplish a tremendous feat every day, serving society by hearing and adjudicating claims by parties great and small. While efficiency may not be a hallmark of the American judicial system, the existing infrastructure has proved remarkable in its ability to let each case be heard. Hard-working judges, attorneys, clerks, and staff endlessly turn the cogs and wheels of our adjudicative machinery in the pursuit of justice. -
Table of Legislation
Table of Legislation Belgium Private International Law Code (‘Code de droit international prive´’), 16 July 2004. Canada Alberta First Nations Sacred Ceremonial Objects Repatriation Act, RSA 2000, c. F-14. An Act to Amend and Consolidate the Laws Respecting Indians, SC 1880, c. 28. An Act Further to Amend The Indian Act of 1880, SC 1884, c. 27, s. 3. An Act to Amend the Indian Act, SC 1918, c. 26. An Act Respecting Indians, SC 1951, c. 29, s. 123(2). Cultural Property Export and Import Act, RSC 1985, c. C-51. European Union Council Regulation 2001/44/EC of 22 December 2000 on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters/ Brussels I Regulation (OJ L 12, 16 January 2001). Council Directive 93/7/EEC of 15 March 1993 on the Return of Cultural Objects Unlawfully Removed from the Territory of a Member State (OJ L 74/74, 27 March 1993). K. Kuprecht, Indigenous Peoples’ Cultural Property Claims, 193 DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-01655-9, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 194 Table of Legislation France Act No. 2002-323 of 6 March 2002 concerning the Restitution of the Mortal Remains of Saartjie Baartman from France to South Africa (‘Loi relative a` la restitution par la France de la de´pouille mortelle de Saartjie Baartman a` l’Afrique du Sud’). Act No. 2010-501 of 18 May 2010 aiming at Authorising the Restitution of Ma¯ori Heads from France to New Zealand and on the Management of Collections (‘Loi visant a` autoriser la restitution par la France des teˆtes maories a` la Nouvelle- Ze´lande et relatives a` la gestion des collections’). -
American Indian Law: a Discourse on Chthonic Law
North Dakota Law Review Volume 89 Number 1 Article 2 1-1-2013 American Indian Law: A Discourse on Chthonic Law Gregory Gagnon Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Gagnon, Gregory (2013) "American Indian Law: A Discourse on Chthonic Law," North Dakota Law Review: Vol. 89 : No. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr/vol89/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Dakota Law Review by an authorized editor of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AMERICAN INDIAN LAW: A DISCOURSE ON CHTHONIC LAW GREGORY GAGNON* ABSTRACT This discourse on Chthonic Law, a theory propounded by H. Patrick Glenn among others, is the occasion for describing advantages and disadvantages of the introduction of customary American Indian law (Chthonic law) into the courtroom. Remarks on the theory, considerations of its merits and weaknesses and illustrations from American Indian societies lead to the conclusion that Chthonic law should become part of the admissible evidence in American courts. A major criticism of Chthonic Law theory is that it tends to describe a fictionalized version of society. Examples of American Indian violence, use of punishment, and private property law counter the idyllic construction of Chthonic law. Examples of the actual operation of a different legal system do exist, particularly the use of compensation and the justice goal of restoration after offenses.