Corporate Sovereignty LAW and GOVERNMENT UNDER CAPITALISM

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Corporate Sovereignty LAW and GOVERNMENT UNDER CAPITALISM Corporate Sovereignty LAW AND GOVERNMENT UNDER CAPITALISM Joshua Barkan University o f Minnesota Press f t Minneapolis K.'f • L o n d o n |ft A different version of chapter 3 previously appeared as “Liberal Government and the Corporate Person,” Journal o f Cultural Economy 3, no. 1 (2010): 53-68, reprinted by permission of Taylor &c Francis. A portion of chapter 5 previously appeared in “Roberto Esposito’s Political Biology and Corporate Forms of Life,” Law, Culture, and the Humanities 8, no. 1 (2012): 84-101, reprinted with permission of SAGE Publications. Copyright 2013 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by the University of Minnesota Press 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 290 Minneapolis, MN 55401-2520 http://www.upress.umn.edu Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Barkan,Joshua Corporate sovereignty : law and government under capitalism / Joshua Barkan. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8166-7426-8 (he : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8166-7427-5 (pb : alk. paper) 1. Corporation law. 2. Corporate power. 3. Corporate governance— Law and legislation. 4. Corporate state. 5. Sovereignty. 6. Capitalism. I. Title. K1315.B36 2013 346'.066—dc23 2013010385 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper The University of Minnesota is an equal-opportunity educator and employer. 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The Corporate University The preceding chapters have argued that corporate power and political sovereignty are genealogically linked and therefore unintelligible without one another, and they have explained the political implications that fol­ low from such an argument. In particular, I have set out to demonstrate that the problem of sovereign abandonment reappears not only through the exercise of corporate power but even, and more alarmingly, in some of the best attempts to limit corporate power and redirect corporations toward more socially beneficial ends. Readers might understandably take from this the politically paralyzing notion that corporations or corporate power are somehow impervious to social control, destined to regulate life itself in particularly nefarious ways. In truth, my argument runs pre­ cisely in the other direction. Approaching corporate power genealogi­ cally shows the true tragedy of corporate sovereignty1—a tragedy inherent in the double nature of corporations as collective institutions. Although corporations continually pose questions about being in common and po­ litical autonomy, these potentialities are for the most part unrealized in the particular renderings of corporate power in modern Western political and legal thought. Nonetheless, the problems of collective action and au­ tonomy remain internal to the articulation of sovereignty and capitalism that structures corporate institutions. In this final chapter, I would like to show the nonnecessity of this articu­ lation by thinking through one specific issue: the corporate university. As an academic who has spent a large portion of my life institutionalized, so to speak, in the university, current questions about the social functions and governance of universities play an outsized role in my own concerns. The claim, however, that universities are ivory towers and that what happens in these institutions is only of narrow academic interest fails to grapple with the important role of universities in contemporary political economy.2 Regional scientists and planners have examined the roles of universities in the development of regional innovation centers, such as Silicon Valley and the Route 128 corridor in Massachusetts, which are presented as the leading edge of today’s “knowledge economy” 1 Similarly, the creation of higher education markets, transnational research collaborations, and the importing and exporting of researchers, students, and physical university assets have become important avenues by which states promote and profit from foreign direct investment.4 Scholars have also documented the use of university-led development as a strategy for industrializing states in the context of contemporary globalization.1 In the United States, public research institutions, cognizant of these changes, Justify public support in the language of Jobs and economic growth, while also attempting to profit from university research, on one hand, and increasing tuition, on the other.6 Students are well aware that academic credentials are a nec­ essary precondition for entering global labor markets and are taking on unprecedented levels of indebtedness toward that end.7 Meanwhile, the sectors of for-profit and online universities are rapidly expanding, with even worse results for student finances.8 In response, universities are re- emerging as one of the primary locations for political activism and opposi­ tion, as these transformations, along with more localized policies such as department closings, labor struggles, and fee increases and tuition hikes, have set off protests at universities across the United States but also in many other parts of the world.9 Contrary to the ivory tower image, then, universities already are an integral part of the world and central to new circuits of capital accumu­ lation. Yet the connections between universities and contemporary global political economy have many activists and scholars concerned. A grow­ ing chorus has come to fret about the corporatization of the university. Rather than being a clearly articulated concept, the corporate university stands in with a series of other terms— including the neoliberal university, the military-industrial-academic complex, knowledge factories, academic capitalism, diploma mills, and the commodification or commercialization of higher education— for the ways that universities and the business world bleed into one another.10 In this sense, identifying the troubling changes confronting higher education as corporatization is accurate but also leaves underexamined the question of what corporatization actually entails. The great irony of contemporary discussions on the corporate university is that universities have always been corporations. In fact, universities are one of the primary institutions on which the legal form of incorporation is modeled. This includes not only the power of collective representation for aggregate forms of capital that characterizes modem business corpora­ tions, along with many aspects of the contemporary university, but, more important, the claims to autonomy and freedom that make corporations so troubling for constituted political orders. There are thus vital stakes in how we think about and engage the cor­ porate university. This chapter offers a response to corporatization that is quite different from the current talk of “dismantling” these institutions." The first section begins by reviewing the structural transformations com­ monly referred to as the corporatization of the university. This is a large and ever-growing literature, and the central concept of “corporatization” remains somewhat ill defined. My purpose is not to provide an exhaus­ tive empirical account of the changes across a wide variety of institutions of higher learning in different geographic settings but rather to provide a general overview of the concerns critics have associated with the corpo­ ratization of the university. Scholars have argued that corporatization is changing the institutional practices of universities as well as the content of university teaching and research. One of the notable aspects of these arguments is the way they have congealed into an interdisciplinary discus­ sion, if not a full-blown field, of “critical university studies.”1-The second section examines the way that the corporate university and corporatiza­ tion are constructed as obJects of disciplinary reflection in this emergent field and advocates a different way of approaching research, thinking, and reading about the corporate university that is not interdisciplinary as much as it is antidisciplinary. The third section considers the corporate university from an antidis­ ciplinary perspective by examining two texts: a pamphlet written by the noted medievalist Ernst Kantorowicz (who we met in chapter 1), titled The Fundamental Issue, and Ernst Freund’s short 1897 text (which we encountered in chapter 3), The Legal Nature of Corporations. Although there are many troublesome arguments in both of these documents, I sug­ gest that they allow us to envision an alterative formulation of the corpo­ rate university, one that is oriented not around an anticorporate capitalism (which maintains the production of capitalist value while lashing out at the corporate legal form) or a corporate anticapitalism (in which global businesses market to consumers reified inversions of their revolutionary desires) but rather an anticapitalist corporatism, where corporatism stands for an autonomous politics of being in common." The Corporate University The corporate university thesis is an account of economic restructuring. Although critics note long-standing concerns about the influence of busi­ ness in university education (dating back at least to Thorstein Veblen’s 1918 tract The Higher Learning in America), they equate the corporati­ zation of the university with a series of macroeconomic, institutional,
Recommended publications
  • Medieval Germany in America
    GERMAN HISTORICAL INSTITUTE WASHNGTON, D.C. ANNUAL LECTURE SERIES No. 8 MEDIEVAL GERMANY IN AMERICA Patrick J. Geary With a comment by Otto Gerhard Oexle ANNUAL LECTURE 1995 German Historical Institute Washington, D.C. MEDIEVAL GERMANY IN AMERICA Patrick J. Geary With a comment by Otto Gerhard Oexle © 1996 by German Historical Institute Annual Lecture Series, No. 8 Edited by Detlef Junker, Petra Marquardt-Bigman and Janine S. Micunck ______________ GERMAN HISTORICAL INSTITUTE 1607 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20009, USA MEDIEVAL GERMANY IN AMERICA Patrick J. Geary WAS THERE ANYTHING TO LEARN? American Historians and German Medieval Scholarship: A Comment Otto Gerhard Oexle Preface For the first time since the founding of the German Historical Institute in 1987, the topic of the 1995 Annual Lecture addressed the German Middle Ages—as perceived through American eyes. We invited two distinguished scholars from the United States and Germany, and their presentations made this evening a truly special event. In his lecture, Professor Patrick J. Geary traced the influence of German medievalists, especially their methods and historiography, on American academia. During the second half of the nineteenth century, German scholarship came to be regarded as an exemplary model, owing to its scholarly excellence. However, within a few decades, German medieval scholarship's function as a model for American academics declined. Professor Geary gave an engaging account of this development and offered at the same time an absorbing analysis of how the perception and interpreta- tion of German medieval history by American historians were shaped by their attempt to explain American history.
    [Show full text]
  • Premodern Rulership and Contemporary Political Power
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN MEDIEVAL STUDIES Mroziewicz & Sroczyński (eds) and Contemporary Power Political Rulership Premodern Edited by Karolina Mroziewicz and Aleksander Sroczyński Premodern Rulership and Contemporary Political Power The King’s Body Never Dies Premodern Rulership and Contemporary Political Power Central European Medieval Studies The series focuses on the geographical centre of the European continent, but also a region representing various historically changing meanings and concepts. It challenges simplistic notions of Central Europe as a periphery to the medieval ‘West’, or, equally, a border between barbarity and civilization; an area of a lively convergence of different ethnic groups, and a socially and culturally framed common space; a point where different ‘Others’ met, or an intermediary ‘bridge’ between the Roman Catholicism and Latinity of the West, and the Slavic Orthodoxy and Hellenism of the Byzantine East. Series Editor Dr. Nada Zečević, University of Eastern Sarajevo Editorial Board Dr. Kateřina Horníčková, University of South Bohemia Dr. Cosmin Popa-Gorjanu, 1 December 1918 University Alba Iulia Dr. Zsolt Hunyadi, University of Szeged Dr. Anna Adamska, Utrecht University Dr. Trpimir Vedriš, University of Zagreb Premodern Rulership and Contemporary Political Power The King’s Body Never Dies Edited by Karolina Mroziewicz and Aleksander Sroczyński Amsterdam University Press This work was financed within the framework of the National Programme for the Develop- ment of the Humanities carried out by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education, 2014-2016. Proofread by Jesse Simon Cover illustration: Frontispiece of John Case’s Sphaera Civitatis (Oxoniæ: excudebat Iosephus Barnesius, 1588). The Folger Shakespeare Library, STC 4761. Used by permission of the Folger Shakespeare Library under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
    [Show full text]
  • Ernst Kantorowicz
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. Introduction A medieval historian appears as a character in a German novel of 1960, Die Rolltreppe (The Escalator). He is the author of a biography of the Hohen- staufen emperor Frederick II and a member of the esoteric circle around the poet Stefan George. During the First World War he had served in Anatolia on the staff of General Liman von Sanders. One scene in the novel is set in 1928 in an elegant Roman restaurant, “Ranieri.” The director of the Prussian Historical Institute is hosting a dinner for a small group consisting of a museum director, a prominent industrialist, and the noted historian. They dine off baked scampi, breast of turkey with artichokes, red endive salad (“particularly fine for the sea- son”), a cheese soufflé (“specialty of the house”), fruit, and coffee. The courses are accompanied by a Barolo, a Frascati, and an Asti Spumante.1 The historian, here called “Witkowski,” is transparently Ernst Kantorowicz (pronounced “Kantor- Ovitch”), who did live in Rome in 1928, did patronize the restaurant in question, and did greatly enjoy Rome’s “sensational Frascati bianco.”2 Later in the novel “Witkowski” appears wearing “a white tropical suit and off-w hite shirt with a red velvet tie,”3 and a photo taken in the same period (fig. 1) shows Kantorowicz in similar attire, with the addition of a white bucket hat and white gloves.
    [Show full text]
  • Stefan George
    UNIVERSIDADE DE BRASÍLIA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM HISTÓRIA - PPGHIS ALEMANHA SECRETA: BIOGRAFIA E HISTÓRIA NO CÍRCULO DE STEFAN GEORGE WALKIRIA OLIVEIRA SILVA BRASÍLIA 2013 WALKIRIA OLIVEIRA SILVA PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM HISTÓRIA - PPGHIS ALEMANHA SECRETA: BIOGRAFIA E HISTÓRIA NO CÍRCULO DE STEFAN GEORGE Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- graduação em História da Universidade de Brasília como parte dos requisitos necessários à obtenção do grau de Mestre em História. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Estevão Chaves de Rezende Martins BRASÍLIA 2013 Alemanha Secreta: Biografia e História no Círculo de Stefan George Walkiria Oliveira Silva Banca Examinadora: ______________________________________ Prof. Dr. Estevão Chaves de Rezende Martins (Orientador) ______________________________________ Prof. Dr. André Gustavo de Melo Araújo (Universidade de Brasília – UNB) ______________________________________ Prof. Dr. Pedro Spinola Pereira Caldas (Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro UNIRIO) Alemanha Secreta: Biografia e História no Círculo de Stefan George. RESUMO: Esta dissertação objetiva analisar como a obra de Ernst Kantorowicz, Kaiser Friedrich der Zweite, relaciona-se com a fundamentação da identidade nacional alemã durante os anos da República de Weimar. Ernst Kantorowicz foi membro do Círculo de Stefan George, um dos principais movimentos culturais da Alemanha durante as três primeiras décadas do século XX. Por isso, é indispensável apresentar as contribuições do Círculo de Stefan George para as discussões acerca da História e de sua escrita. A análise da obra de Kantorowicz encontra-se indissociada das propostas vinculadas pelo Círculo de Stefan George. Este trabalho está divido em três capítulos: o primeiro abarca o poeta, Stefan George, e a formação de seu Círculo. O segundo apresenta as ideias do Círculo sobre o conhecimento histórico e os principais conceitos formulados por alguns membros do Círculo de George.
    [Show full text]
  • Zwischen Bewunderung Und Verachtung
    Umbr_VuF62 11.07.2005 14:28 Uhr Seite 175 Zwischen Bewunderung und Verachtung Französische und deutsche Mediävistik seit dem letzten Kriege VON WERNER PARAVICINI 1. Verachtung Fangen wir mit der Verachtung an.1) Der Schauplatz: die Wasserstufen von S. Giorgio Maggiore, angesichts der Piazzetta, wo ich vor dreißig Jahren mit Fernand Braudel einige Worte wechseln konnte. Er war zum Jubiläumskolloquium der Erinnerung an die Schlacht von Lepanto von 1571 nach Venedig gekommen. Vom Frühneuzeithistoriker Michel Fran- çois war die Rede. Nicht einmal leise gab Braudel sein Urteil ab: »Il est bête, mais qu’est- ce qu’il est bête!« lautete es, unwiderruflich – was mich damals einigermaßen erstaunte. In- zwischen weiß ich, daß solche Urteile bei ihm keine Seltenheit waren. Ähnlich äußerte er sich zu Karl Ferdinand Werner über den Genter Mediävisten François-Louis Ganshof.2) Verachtet wurde das membre de l’Institut, Mitglied der gelehrten, konservativen Acadé- mie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, Direktor der traditionsreichen École des Chartes,3) Generalsekretär des Internationalen Historikerverbandes.4) Verachtet wurde als Quellen- fetischist der kapitularienfressende belgische Kollege. Ob Braudel dergleichen auch über deutsche Historiker gesagt hat, ist mir nicht zu Ohren gekommen. Aber es würde mich nicht wundern. 1) Danken möchte ich Florian Henke (Freiburg i.Br.), Kathrin Höckel (München), Jan Jansen (Freiburg i.Br.), Christian Speer (Dresden) und Christian Wenke (Mainz), die mir während ihrer Zeit als Praktikan- ten im Deutschen Historischen Institut Paris geholfen haben, und Peter Schöttler (Paris/Berlin) für seine kritische und bereichernde Lektüre des gesamten Texts. 2) K.F. Werner 1992, S. 29. Die Äußerung wurde in Heidelberg getan, d.h.
    [Show full text]
  • Jillian Tomm School of Information Studies Mcgill University, Montreal October 2012 a Thesis Submitted to Mcgill University In
    THE IMPRINT OF THE SCHOLAR: AN ANALYSIS OF THE PRINTED BOOKS OF MCGILL UNIVERSITY’S RAYMOND KLIBANSKY COLLECTION Jillian Tomm School of Information Studies McGill University, Montreal October 2012 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Jillian Tomm 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................... iv Résumé ..................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ....................................................................................................................... viii List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... x Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ xii PART I: Introduction and Orientation to the Study ....................................................... 1 Chapter 1: General Introduction and goals of the study ................................................. 1 1.1 Background to the research ....................................................................................... 3 1.2 Research framework.................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Percy Ernst Schramm and Herrschaftszeichen
    MIRATOR 13/2012 37 Percy Ernst Schramm and Herrschaftszeichen Antti Matikkala The career of the German historian Percy Ernst Schramm (1894–1970) was one of the most interesting and versatile in twentieth-century Germany. His importance lies not only in his innovative studies of medieval history, but also in his high-profile public role which was closely connected to his research interests. Arguably, these were not much more than two sides of the same coin. David Thimme’s intellectual biography Percy Ernst Schramm und das Mittelalter (2006), which is based on his 2003 doctoral thesis, examines Schramm first and foremost as a medievalist, but his roles as social historian, war diarist of the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht and contemporary historian of the Second World War still await more detailed analysis. While Thimme has discussed Schramm’s early career and works in great detail, there is only a relatively brief discussion of Herrschaftszeichen und Staatssymbolik, Schramm’s most important post-war work, and related publications.1 This article discusses Schramm as the historian of Herrschaftszeichen, which became perhaps his most enduring ‘brand’, and analyses his historiographical position and scholarly legacy in this respect, thus supplementing Thimme’s account of this theme. Within a broadly chronological framework, it also gives attention to Schramm’s personality, as well as his public and political role, adding some further insights to his networks by using additional sources not employed by Thimme in his book. Thimme’s biography stems from his work in The Collaborative Research Centre Memory Cultures (Sonderforschungsbereich, SFB 434, Erinnerungskulturen) at the University of Gießen, which also produced Anne Christine Nagel’s Im Schatten des Dritten Reichs: Mittelalterforschung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1945–1970.2 The task of writing a biography in the form of a dissertation is not an easy one.
    [Show full text]
  • Loyalty Oath.Pdf
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California THE LOYALTY OATH AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, 1949-1952 Interviews with: Howard Bern Ralph Giesey Mary Tolman Kent Deborah Tolman Whitney Interviews conducted by Germaine LaBerge in 1999 Copyright © 2004 by the Regents of the University of California TABLE OF CONTENTS--The Loyalty Oath Controversy at the University of California, 1949-1952 INTERVIEW HISTORY i INTERVIEW WITH HOWARD BERN iii BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION vii I BACKGROUND 1 Childhood and Education in Canada 1 Family and Religion 2 World War II Service 3 Interest in Science: L.A. School and UCLA 5 U.C. Berkeley, Department of Zoology, 1948 6 II THE LOYALTY OATH 9 Reaction in the Department of Zoology 9 Philosophy Behind Opposition to the Oath 10 Friends Espousing Similar Principles 12 Reasons for Signing 14 The Three Deans and Monroe Deutsch 15 Role of President Sproul 17 Young Radical at UCLA 17 Administrators and Regents 18 AAUP Meeting in the Early Fifties 19 TAPE GUIDE 23 INTERVIEW WITH RALPH GIESEY 25 BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION 29 I. A STUDENT OF ERNST KANTOROWICZ REFLECTS ON HIS PROFESSOR AND THE LOYALTY OATH 31 Background 31 Seminars at Home of Ernst Kantorowicz 32 Other Teaching Assistants 34 Hearings for the TA Non-Signers 35 Who was Fired? 36 Ernst Kantorowicz' Background Before UC Berkeley 37 An Offer from Monroe Deutsch 39 Colleagues 39 Eka's Mesmerizing Presence in the Classroom 40 Eka's Papers 41 Short History of Eka's Circle of TAs 42 Ralph Giesey's Dissertation Related to The King's Two Bodies 44 More on The King's Two Bodies 45 Teaching Assistants' Stance and the George Circle 46 Eka's The Fundamental Issue 47 TAPE GUIDE 51 INTERVIEW WITH MARY TOLMAN KENT 53 BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION 57 I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monolithic View: on the Plurality of Political Theologies in the Writings of Ernst Kantorowicz
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Spring 5-8-2020 The Monolithic View: On the Plurality of Political Theologies in the Writings of Ernst Kantorowicz Andrew Mallory University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Recommended Citation Mallory, Andrew, "The Monolithic View: On the Plurality of Political Theologies in the Writings of Ernst Kantorowicz" (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3211. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/3211 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE MONOLITHIC VIEW: ON THE PLURALITY OF POLITICAL THEOLOGIES IN THE WRITINGS OF ERNST KANTOROWICZ By Andrew Mallory B.A. University of Maine, 2017 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in History) The Graduate School University of Maine May 2020 Advisory Committee: Joel Anderson, Assistant Professor of History, Advisor Michael Lang, Associate Professor of History, Acting Department Chair Nathan Godfried, Adelaide & Alan Bird Professor of History THE MONOLITHIC VIEW: ON THE PLURALITY OF POLITICAL THEOLOGIES IN THE WRITINGS OF ERNST KANTOROWICZ By Andrew Mallory Thesis Advisor: Dr. Joel Anderson An Abstract of the Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in History) May 2020 “The Monolithic View: On the Plurality of Political Theologies in the Writings of Ernst Kantorowicz” is an argument in favor of a revaluation of the concept of “political theology” as it appears in the writings of the twentieth-century German-Jewish medievalist Ernst H.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Storie E La Memoria
    Il volume, che raccoglie i contributi degli ex borsisti italiani E-book del Deutsches Historisches Institut di Roma, vuole essere un omaggio a uno dei medievisti più noti a livello interna- R M Reading, 1 zionale, all'attento e sensibile studioso della storia italiana. Reti Medievali Le storie e la memoria In onore di Arnold Esch a cura di Roberto Delle Donne Andrea Zorzi Estratto a stampa da RM - E-book, Reading - 1 <http://www.rm.unina.it/ebook/festesch.html> ISBN 88-8453-045-8 € 28,00 ‘Historisches Bild’ e signoria del presente Il “Federico II imperatore” * di Ernst Kantorowicz di Roberto Delle Donne 1. Nel dicembre 1922, Ernst Kantorowicz è un giovane laureato che alla tumultuosa ricchezza della vita oppone la ferma volontà di sviluppare armoniosamente l’integrità della persona. La lettura del Raffaello di Wilhelm Stein lo ha “enormemente turbato” ed egli scrive al suo autore: “se avessi avuto dieci anni di più, mi sarei sentito mancare il terreno sotto i piedi oppu- re mi sarebbe parso incomprensibile che non solo parola e azione possano promuovere un’idea, ma che vi sia ancora una terza possibilità: l’immagine. Tutti lo abbiamo saputo, certo! Cionondimeno, oggi, a noi manca l’esten- sione dello sguardo”. Raffaello ne offre invece una vivida testimonianza e che ciò sia “stato per me così difficile da capire mostra in che misura io sia ‘disabituato alla visione immaginativa’ – e con me la maggior parte di noi, per tacer poi del tutto di coloro che sono esterni (Außenstehende)”1. L’attenzione di Kantorowicz per le immagini ha inizio
    [Show full text]
  • 'Humanitas Et Ratio
    ‘Humanitas et Ratio - Reflections of Ludwig Edelstein’s life and work in his extant epistolary network’ Fiona Jade Howarth Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of History, Classics and Archaeology Newcastle University February 2015 Abstract This thesis produces an in-depth study of Ludwig Edelstein’s life and work enabled by the use of his correspondence read in the light of his ample scholarly output. Ludwig Edelstein (1902-1965) was an important scholar in the fields of the history of ancient medicine and science, classics, and philosophy, yet his life has not been accorded the interest it merits. This thesis will be the first extensive exploration of the entanglement of Edelstein’s bion and ergon. It will demonstrate the importance of considering life and work within the same sphere. Furthermore, it will underline the value of using correspondence for historiography and the richness of information a biographical study can provide, strengthening the case for more investigations of this kind. The thesis adopts a thematic approach and each chapter will explore Edelstein in a different role; as a dissenter, friend, collaborator, scholar, and teacher. The combined study of Edelstein’s correspondence alongside his published work allows for a more complete understanding of Edelstein’s legacy than has been available thus far. However, Edelstein’s life cannot be separated from its context, and so the thesis will also provide valuable information on a number of other areas including, but not limited to, the history of the disciplines he worked in, the intellectual milieu he was a part of, the ‘red scare’ at American universities, humanist ideals of education, and, via the first portrayal of his wife ever written, the position of female scholars in the first half of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook of Medieval Studies
    Handbook of Medieval Studies Terms - Methods - Trends Edited by Albrecht Classen Volume 1 De Gruyter ISBN 978-3-11-018409-9 e-ISBN 978-3-11-021558-8 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Handbook of medieval studies : terms, methods, trends / edited by Albrecht Classen. p. cm. ISBN 978-3-11-018409-9 (alk. paper) 1. Middle Ages - Historiography. 2. Middle Ages - Study and teaching. 3. Literature, Medieval - History and criticism. 4. Middle Ages - Bibliography. 5. Medievalists - Biography. I. Classen, Albrecht. D116.H37 2010 940.1072-dc22 2010040766 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. Ą 2010 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/New York Typesetting: Dörlemann-Satz GmbH & Co. KG, Lemförde Printing: Hubert & Co. GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen ϱ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com V Table of Contents Table of Contents Volume 1: Introduction ............................. XV Survey of Fundamental Reference Works in Medieval Studies .............................. XXV Abbreviations . LXVII List of Contributors . LXXVII Main Topics and Debates of the Last Decades and their Terminology and Results Arabic and Islamic Studies ..................... The Arab West (Thomas F. Glick).................. 3 The Arab East (Mark David Luce).................. 6 Arabic Literature (Mark Pettigrew) . 14 Archeology and History of Art in Pre-Islamic Iran and Central Asia (Matteo Compareti) . 25 Classical Persian Literature (Mark David Luce) . 38 Islamic Philosophy (Alessandro Cancian) . 46 Islamic Theology (Livnat Holtzman) . 56 Natural Sciences in the Islamic Context (Glen M. Cooper) .
    [Show full text]