DOCSLIB.ORG

Parentsnext: Examination of Social Security (Parenting Payment Participation Requirements–Class of Persons) Instrument 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parentsnext: Examination of Social Security (Parenting Payment Participation Requirements–Class of Persons) Instrument 2021 Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights Inquiry report ParentsNext: examination of Social Security (Parenting payment participation requirements–class of persons) Instrument 2021 4 August 2021 © Commonwealth of Australia 2021 ISBN 978-1-76093-266-4 PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Phone: 02 6277 3823 Fax: 02 6277 5767 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.aph.gov.au/joint_humanrights/ This report can be cited as: Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights, ParentsNext: examination of Social Security (Parenting payment Participation requirements – class of persons) instrument 2021 inquiry report; [2021] AUPJCHR 88. This document was prepared by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights and printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Department of the Senate, Parliament House, Canberra. Membership of the committee Members Dr Anne Webster MP, Chair Mallee, Victoria, Nats Mr Graham Perrett MP, Deputy Chair Moreton, Queensland, ALP Senator Patrick Dodson Western Australia, ALP Mr Steve Georganas MP Adelaide, South Australia, ALP Mr Ian Goodenough MP Moore, Western Australia, LP Senator Nita Green Queensland, ALP Ms Celia Hammond MP Curtin, Western Australia, LP Senator Andrew McLachlan CSC South Australia, LP Senator Benjamin Small Western Australia, LP Senator Lidia Thorpe Victoria, AG Secretariat Anita Coles, Committee Secretary Charlotte Fletcher, Principal Research Officer Rebecca Preston, Principal Research Officer Ingrid Zappe, Legislative Research Officer External legal adviser Associate Professor Jacqueline Mowbray iii iv Table of contents Membership of the committee ........................................................................ iii Recommendations .......................................................................................... vii Chapter 1—Background .................................................................................... 1 Overview of the legislative instrument ..................................................................... 1 Initiation of inquiry .................................................................................................... 1 Conduct of inquiry ..................................................................................................... 3 Structure of the report .............................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2—The instrument ............................................................................... 5 Legislative framework ............................................................................................... 5 The ParentsNext Program ......................................................................................... 8 Compulsory participation .......................................................................................... 9 Departmental oversight of ParentsNext providers ................................................. 13 Chapter 3—Key issues raised .......................................................................... 15 Impact of participation in ParentsNext ................................................................... 16 Whether compulsory participation in ParentsNext is required for its success ...... 26 The extent to which ParentsNext operates flexibly ................................................ 36 Evidence of harms experienced by participants ..................................................... 53 The impact on Indigenous participants ................................................................... 66 Chapter 4—Human rights assessment ............................................................. 73 Rights possibly promoted by the ParentsNext program ......................................... 73 Linking ParentsNext with the receipt of social welfare payments ......................... 74 Permissible limitations on human rights ................................................................. 87 Human rights assessment of the instrument .......................................................... 95 Committee view .................................................................................................... 108 v Additional comments by Australian Labor members ..................................... 113 Additional comments by Australian Greens member .................................... 115 Appendix 1—Submissions received ............................................................... 117 Appendix 2—Public hearing .......................................................................... 119 Appendix 3—Tabled documents, additional information and questions on notice ...................................................................................... 121 vi Recommendations Recommendation 1 4.91 The committee considers that if participation in ParentsNext were voluntary this could promote a range of human rights and no human rights would be limited. As such, the committee considers that the human rights compatibility of the measure would be addressed if an individual's qualification for parenting payment was not linked to the person meeting participation requirements (such as compulsory participation in ParentsNext). As such, the committee recommends that a class of persons not be prescribed for the purposes of paragraph 500(1)(ca) of the Social Security Act 1991. Recommendation 2 4.92 If participation in ParentsNext remains compulsory, the committee recommends the following changes be made to assist with the proportionality of the measure: (a) that a parent is only required to enter into a Parenting Payment Employment Pathway Plan after an assessment of their individual circumstances, including consideration of the best interests of any child as a primary consideration; (b) that payment suspensions are only applied once a ParentsNext provider has successfully contacted the parent and established why they have not met their participation requirements, and made an assessment that the suspension would not result in the parent and any children being unable to meet their immediate basic needs; (c) that payment reductions and cancellations are only applied after an assessment has been made that to do so would not result in the parent and any children being unable to meet their immediate basic needs; and (d) that further consultation be undertaken with Indigenous-led organisations, and affected Indigenous communities, to obtain their free, prior and informed consent to participate in ParentsNext. vii Page 1 Chapter 1 Background Overview of the legislative instrument 1.1 The Social Security (Parenting payment participation requirements - class of persons) Instrument 2021 (the instrument) was registered on 22 January 2021. Its provisions came into force on 1 July 2021. 1.2 The instrument specifies the class of persons subject to compulsory participation in the ParentsNext program and merges two existing streams as to how the program is delivered to people into one stream. The ParentsNext program may require that a person: attend playgroups; complete further education and training; or address non-vocational barriers to employment such as through counselling or health appointments. A failure to attend these appointments without a reasonable excuse can result in the person's parenting payments being suspended and, if there is a persistent failure, reduced or cancelled. 1.3 Providing access to a program which is intended to provide early support to young parents with a lower level of educational attainment to help them plan and prepare for employment before their youngest child starts school, including by participating in educational activities or activities with their children, may promote the rights to work, education, and the rights of the child. However, by making such participation compulsory, and providing that a person who fails to participate may have their parenting payment reduced, suspended or cancelled, this measure also engages and may limit several other human rights including the rights to: social security; an adequate standard of living; a private life; equality and non- discrimination; and the rights of the child. Initiation of inquiry 1.4 The mandate of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights (the committee) under paragraph 7(a) of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 is to examine all bills and legislative instruments that come before either House of the Parliament for compatibility with human rights1 and to report to both 1 'Human rights' is defined in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 to mean the rights and freedoms recognised or declared by seven international instruments: International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination; International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women; Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment; Convention on the Rights of the Child; and Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Page 2 Houses of the Parliament on that issue. As such, the committee is required to examine the instrument as part of its scrutiny of legislative instruments. 1.5 The committee tabled its initial consideration of this instrument in its Report 2 of 2021 on 24 February 2021, seeking a response from
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fnqroc Advocacy Report
    FNQROC ADVOCACY REPORT Federal Pre-Election Delegation (12-14 Feb 2019) FEDERAL ELECTION PRIORITIES 1 PRIORITY PROJECT FEDERAL REQUEST FNQROC seeks $800m contribution towards an Kuranda Range estimated $1b project to resolve the safety, capacity INFRASTRUCTURE Road and reliability issues of Kuranda Range Road Extension of the FNQROC seeks the extension of the national Land INFRASTRUCTURE national Land Transport Network Transport Network Innisfail Strategic Masterplan Project – FNQROC seeks $8.3m towards the estimate $25m INFRASTRUCTURE Linking to the Bruce required to deliver the project Hwy FNQROC seeks commitment To the expansion of Cairns Port DEFENCE HMAS Cairns and ancillary facilities and commitments Masterplan to undertake naval maintenance activities in Cairns FNQROC seeks formal commitment of $20m now that BIO PRECINCTS Mossman Mill the business case has been completed FNQROC seeks formal commitment of $20m towards NQ Bio-Energy BIO PRECINCTS the NQBE $600m Renewable Energy Facility (NQBE) – Ingham FNQROC supports further progression of the Cardstone Pumped Cardstone Pumped Hydro Scheme Business Case with ENERGY Hydro Scheme an estimated timetable for delivery FNQROC seeks commitment to a timetable for the delivery of Nullinga Dam to support agricultural WATER Nullinga Dam development and the long term urban water security needs of Cairns FNQROC seeks commitment of $7m funding to proceed from Preliminary Business Case (completed) Tablelands Irrigation WATER to Detailed Business Case and Environmental Impact Project Assessment FNQROC seeks the establishment of a weather station Central FNQ ENVIRONMENT covering central Far North Queensland Weather Station FNQROC seeks support for the Wet Tropics Management Authority request for $3m per year ($3m State and $3m Federal) for seven years from July 2019 ENVIRONMENT Yellow Crazy Ants to continue its successful Yellow Crazy Ants Eradication Program FNQROC seeks Building Better Regions funding of $1m DIGITAL Carpentaria Fibre towards the estimated $2.9m project cost.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Winds of Civilization: the Aboriginal and Sovereignty Between the Desert and the State,” Intersections 10, No
    intersections online Volume 10, Number 2 (Spring 2009) Luke Caldwell, “The Changing Winds of Civilization: The Aboriginal and Sovereignty Between the Desert and the State,” intersections 10, no. 2 (2009): 119-149. ABSTRACT The antagonistic relationship between the Australian state and the Aborigines has deep and problematic roots. Beginning with the racist doctrine of terra nullius, I look at how more than two hundred years of legal policies have consistently constructed the Aborigine as a problem that required a state solution. I argue that these policies are predicated on a complete denial of native sovereignty and have increasingly alienated native communities. By refusing to engage with the source of these problems, the state has created significant barriers to native rehabilitation and has hijacked reconciliation efforts to strengthen its hegemony instead of native groups. Rather than solving the “Aboriginal problem”, these state policies have created it by placing Aborigines in an ambiguous political space that functions as a medium for civilizing the native—a process through which the native is killed and reborn in a form that is unproblematic for the state. http://depts.washington.edu/chid/intersections_Spring_2009/Luke_Caldwell_The_Changing_Winds_of_Civilization.pdf © 2009 intersections, Luke Caldwell. This article may not be reposted, reprinted, or included in any print or online publication, website, or blog, without the expressed written consent of intersections and the author 119 intersections Spring 2009 The Changing Winds of Civilization The Aboriginal and Sovereignty Between the Desert and the State By Luke Caldwell University of Washington, Seattle n 1770, Captain James Cook sailed up the eastern coast of what is now I Australia, unfurled a ―Union Jack‖, and claimed half of an inhabited continent under the authority of the British Crown.
    [Show full text]
  • Upholding the Australian Constitution Volume Seventeen
    Upholding the Australian Constitution Volume Seventeen Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference of The Samuel Griffith Society Greenmount Beach Resort, Hill Street, Coolangatta © Copyright 2005 by The Samuel Griffith Society. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Foreword John Stone Dinner Address Hon Chief Justice Paul de Jersey, AC Evolution of the Judicial Function: Undesirable Blurring? Introductory Remarks John Stone Chapter One Kevin Lindeberg The Heiner Affair Chapter Two Professor Suri Ratnapala Constitutional Vandalism under Green Cover Chapter Three Bruce Grundy The Missing Constitutional Ingredient: An Upper House Chapter Four John Nethercote Senate Vacancies: Casual or Contrived? Chapter Five Sir David Smith, KCVO, AO The Governor-General is our Head of State Chapter Six Professor Andrew Fraser Monarchs and Miracles Chapter Seven Dr John Forbes Native Title Today Chapter Eight Bob Bottom, OAM Frauding the Vote in Queensland i Chapter Nine Bryan Pape The Use and Abuse of the Commonwealth Finance Power Chapter Ten Dr Dominic Katter Australia’s International Legal Obligations: Maritime Zones and Christmas Island Chapter Eleven Professor Gregory Rose The United Nations as a Source of International Legal Authority Appendix I John Stone Tribute to the late Sir Harry Gibbs Appendix II Rt Hon Sir Harry Gibbs, GCMG, AC, KBE Australia Day Messages, 2001-2005 Appendix III Contributors ii Foreword John Stone Important though the periodic Conferences of The Samuel Griffith Society are, the Proceedings of our 17th Conference, held at Coolangatta on 8-10 April last, which are recorded in this volume of our series Upholding the Australian Constitution, pale into insignificance compared with the subsequent death of our President, the Right Honourable Sir Harry Gibbs, GCMG, AC, KBE.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Leadership—Perspectives and Practices
    Public Leadership Perspectives and Practices Public Leadership Perspectives and Practices Edited by Paul ‘t Hart and John Uhr Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/public_leadership _citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Public leadership pespectives and practices [electronic resource] / editors, Paul ‘t Hart, John Uhr. ISBN: 9781921536304 (pbk.) 9781921536311 (pdf) Series: ANZSOG series Subjects: Leadership Political leadership Civic leaders. Community leadership Other Authors/Contributors: Hart, Paul ‘t. Uhr, John, 1951- Dewey Number: 303.34 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by John Butcher Images comprising the cover graphic used by permission of: Victorian Department of Planning and Community Development Australian Associated Press Australian Broadcasting Corporation Scoop Media Group (www.scoop.co.nz) Cover graphic based on M. C. Escher’s Hand with Reflecting Sphere, 1935 (Lithograph). Printed by University Printing Services, ANU Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2008 ANU E Press John Wanna, Series Editor Professor John Wanna is the Sir John Bunting Chair of Public Administration at the Research School of Social Sciences at The Australian National University. He is the director of research for the Australian and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG).
    [Show full text]
  • The Media and Indigenous Policy
    The Media and Indigenous Policy How news media reporting and mediatized practice impact on Indigenous policy A preliminary report Copyright © Kerry McCallum, Michael Meadows, Lisa Waller, Michelle Dunne Breen, Holly Reid, 2012 ISBN: 9781740883658 Editor: Associate Professor Kerry McCallum, Journalism & Communication Studies, Faculty of Arts & Design, University of Canberra Editorial Assistant: Monica Andrew Contributors: Kerry McCallum Michael Meadows Lisa Waller Michelle Dunne Breen Holly Reid Further information about the Australian News Media and Indigenous Policy-making 1988-2008 project is available at http://www.canberra.edu.au/faculties/arts-design/research/active- research-groups/public-communication/Indigenous-Policymaking This research was supported under the Australian Research Council’s Discovery Projects funding scheme (DP0987457), with additional funding supplied by the Faculty of Arts and Design, University of Canberra. ii Contents Acknowledgements v Executive summary vii Researchers ix Introduction 1 Media reporting and Indigenous policymaking 3 Kerry McCallum Policymaker perspectives 11 Managing the optics of Indigenous policy 13 Kerry McCallum & Lisa Waller When the stars align 23 Michael Meadows Media perspectives 33 Indigenous health reporting 1988–2008 34 Framing Indigenous Health, 1988–1995 37 Kerry McCallum Practice imperfect: media, discourse and intervention 43 Michelle Dunne-Breen Journalists, ‘remote’ Indigenous sources and cultural competence 51 Lisa Waller From little things big things grow: campaigning journalism
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Rights and the 1991-2000 Australian Reconciliation Process
    Indigenous Rights and the 1991-2000 Australian Reconciliation Process Andrew Gunstone Abstract The formal reconciliation process in Australia was conducted between 1991 and 2000 and aimed to reconcile Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples by 2001. In this paper, I detail the failure of both this reconciliation process and governments, in particular the Howard Government, to recognise Indigenous rights, such as sovereignty, a treaty, self-determination and land rights. In 1991, the Australian Commonwealth Parliament unanimously passed the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation Act 1991 which instituted a ten-year formal process of reconciliation. The aim of this process was to reconcile Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples by the centenary of Australia’s federation in 2001. The process was facilitated and promoted by the government-initiated Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation (CAR). During the reconciliation decade, many Indigenous political leaders, involved in key Indigenous organisations, such as CAR or the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC), and who were mostly men, consistently and clearly advocated that a range of Indigenous rights needed to be genuinely recognised by the reconciliation process and governments. These rights included sovereignty, self-determination, land rights, intellectual and cultural rights, parliamentary representation and a treaty. In this paper, I detail this history of political demands for Indigenous rights by Indigenous leaders between 1991 and 2000. I argue that these demands, despite
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Thunder: the Maralinga Story
    ABORIGINAL HISTORY Volume forty-one 2017 ABORIGINAL HISTORY Volume forty-one 2017 Published by ANU Press and Aboriginal History Inc. The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Aboriginal History Incorporated Aboriginal History Inc. is a part of the Australian Centre for Indigenous History, Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University, and gratefully acknowledges the support of the School of History and the National Centre for Indigenous Studies, The Australian National University. Aboriginal History Inc. is administered by an Editorial Board which is responsible for all unsigned material. Views and opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily shared by Board members. Members of the Editorial Board Maria Nugent (Chair), Tikka Wilson (Secretary), Rob Paton (Treasurer/Public Officer), Ingereth Macfarlane (Co-Editor), Liz Conor (Co-Editor), Luise Hercus (Review Editor), Annemarie McLaren (Associate Review Editor), Rani Kerin (Monograph Editor), Brian Egloff, Karen Fox, Sam Furphy, Niel Gunson, Geoff Hunt, Dave Johnston, Shino Konishi, Harold Koch, Ann McGrath, Ewen Maidment, Isabel McBryde, Peter Read, Julia Torpey, Lawrence Bamblett. Editors: Ingereth Macfarlane and Liz Conor; Book Review Editors: Luise Hercus and Annemarie McLaren; Copyeditor: Geoff Hunt. About Aboriginal History Aboriginal History is a refereed journal that presents articles and information in Australian ethnohistory and contact and post-contact history of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hon. Malcolm Turnbull Mp Prime Minister Transcript
    THE HON. MALCOLM TURNBULL MP PRIME MINISTER TRANSCRIPT Saturday, 27 May 2017 Speech at the 50th Anniversary of the 1967 Referendum and 25th Anniversary of the Mabo Decision Luncheon Melbourne, Victoria E&OE… PRIME MINISTER: I acknowledge that we are here on the land of the Wurundjeri people whose country extends to the north of the Birrarung, and the Boonwurrung people whose country extends to the south. I pay my deepest respects to them, and their elders past and present. And I acknowledge the campaigners of the 1967 Referendum, including here today Uncle Syd Jackson and Mr Jason Oakley, and the plaintiffs in the great Mabo litigation, whose 25th anniversary we are commemorating this week as well. I’m joined by my Parliamentary colleagues Nigel Scullion, the Minister for Indigenous Affairs and Ken Wyatt MP, the Minister for Indigenous Health. Ken has actually just left us and said he’s got to go and meet with the AMA – but I think it’d be more entertaining here. It is good to be joined by Bill Shorten, the Leader of the Opposition. And of course, the AFL – thank you for the extraordinary leadership you show. 700 AFL players, Richard, I was told a moment ago, Richard and Gill – 82 Indigenous players out of 700. What a great achievement. Tanya, thank you for your great speech and your great leadership. Justin Mohamed – CEO, Reconciliation Australia and Tom Calma - Co Chair. And so many dear friends and distinguished guests. I want to thank for the Welcome to Country – Aunty Zeta and Aunty Carolyne.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Assembly Convened
    DEBATES – Tuesday 18 October 2016 CONTENTS ASSEMBLY CONVENED ............................................................................................................................... 1 NOTICE CALLING TOGETHER THE THIRTEENTH ASSEMBLY ................................................................. 1 ATTENDANCE OF HIS HONOUR THE ADMINISTRATOR TO DECLARE OPEN THE THIRTEENTH ASSEMBLY ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 RETURN TO WRIT ......................................................................................................................................... 1 ADMINISTRATION OF OATHS AND AFFIRMATIONS .................................................................................. 1 ELECTION OF SPEAKER .............................................................................................................................. 2 COMMISSION TO ADMINISTER OATHS AND AFFIRMATIONS .................................................................. 3 ATTENDANCE OF HIS HONOUR THE ADMINISTRATOR TO ADDRESS THE ASSEMBLY ...................... 3 ADMINISTRATOR’S ADDRESS ..................................................................................................................... 4 ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS ORDER ........................................................................................... 10 OPPOSITION OFFICE HOLDERS ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Indigenous Policy in the Neoliberal Age
    Australian Indigenous Policy in the Neoliberal Age: Reassessing ‘Indigenous’ Responsibility Paul J. Dornan A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Health, Arts and Design Swinburne University of Technology 2020 Declaration By Author To the best of my knowledge, this thesis contains no material that has previously been published by any other person except without due acknowledgement being made. This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university. Signed: Paul Dornan 2 Statement of Contributions to Jointly Authored Works Contained in the Thesis No jointly-authored works Statement of Contributions by Others to the thesis as a Whole No contributions by others Statement of Parts of the thesis Submitted to Qualify for the Award of Another Degree None Published Works by the Author Incorporated into the Thesis None Additional Published Works by the Author Relevant to the Thesis but not Forming Part of it None 3 Acknowledgments I would first like to acknowledge my supervising team including associate supervisor Katya Pechenkina, for her support and helpful suggestions. Special thanks must go to my primary supervisor Lorenzo Veracini. When I decided to undertake my PhD studies I had a project like this in mind. I looked Australia-wide for the ‘right’ supervisor. Someone who had the expertise and the standing to ensure this project would be all it could be. Lorenzo has exceeded my expectations and I remain indebted to him. I would also like to acknowledge my mother Kath Coxon and other family members for their love and support throughout the journey.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Indigenous Women's Leadership in Australia
    Deadly Women: An Analysis of Indigenous Women’s Leadership in Australia. Tess Ryan A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy – 254LC University of Canberra 2018 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Context .............................................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Aims ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Research Parameters........................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Disciplinary Approach .......................................................................................................... 4 Problem Description and Research Question ............................................................. 4 Positioning and Structure ............................................................................................ 5 Significance of Study.................................................................................................... 6 Approach, Research Design and Methods .................................................................. 7 Contribution to New Knowledge ................................................................................. 7 2 Profiles of Indigenous Women ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ERC JUSTICE UPDATES April 2021 No.2 No.44
    ERC JUSTICE UPDATES April 2021 No.2 No.44 Dear All, Welcome to the 44th Edition of ERC Justice Updates your regular newsletter from the Edmund Rice Centre, on all sorts of matters relating to human rights, first nations and environmental justice. As one never knows what we are to face from day to day and what shocks the world will bring us, let us give thanks for what we are blessed with and think of those in war-torn countries who face daily atrocities - let us pause and reflect on the words of Martin Luther King As always please send us anything you would like included in Justice Updates. Your suggestions and comments both positive and negative or indeed any information that you would like to disseminate amongst the wider Edmund Rice Network - it is all much appreciated. Don't forget to forward Justice Updates onto anyone or let me know their email address and I will subscribe them. Previous editions are available at https://www.erc.org.au/newsletters Peace Marita Communications Project Officer, Marita McInerney Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised that there may be articles in this publication with names and images of deceased people. In an article in 'The Conversation' on 15th April entitled: 'Failure is not an option': after a lost decade on climate action, the 2020's offer one last chance - Professor Will Steffan discusses the Climate Council's recently released report 'Aim High: Go Fast: Why Emissions Need to Plummet This Decade'. The report acknowledges - It will be virtually impossible to keep average global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees C this century.
    [Show full text]