Building a Formative Assessment System That Is Easy to Adopt Yet Supports Long-Term Improvement: a Review of the Literature and Design Recommendations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Solaiman E, Barney J, Smith M. Building A Formative Assessment System That is Easy To Adopt Yet Supports Long-Term Improvement: A Review of the Literature and Design Recommendations. In: 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education CSEDU. 2017, Porto, Portugal. Copyright: This is the author’s manuscript of a paper that was presented at the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education CSEDU, held 21-23 April 2017, Porto, Portugal. Link to Conference website: http://www.csedu.org/ Date deposited: 05/05/2017 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License Newcastle University ePrints - eprint.ncl.ac.uk Building A Formative Assessment System That is Easy To Adopt Yet Supports Long-Term Improvement: A Review of the Literature and Design Recommendations Ellis Solaiman, Joshua Barney, and Martin Smith School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, United Kingdom fellis.solaiman, j.barney1, [email protected] Keywords: Formative Assessment, Assessment Design, Review, Feedback Automation, Education Technology Abstract: Formative assessment has been shown to be an effective teaching tool, yet is infrequently used in practice. With the intent of building a formative e-assessment platform, we examine research on formative practices and supporting computer-based systems with a focus on: institutional barriers to adoption of previous systems; senses in which students and teachers can improve their practices across varying timescales; and collectible data (self-reported or otherwise) necessary or advantageous in supporting these processes. From this research we identify the minimal set of data which adequately supports these processes of improvement, arrive at a set of requirements and recommendations for an innovative system which collects, processes, and presents this data appropriately, and from these requirements design the architecture of an extensible electronic formative assessment system which balances the need for complex long-term analytics with that of accessibility. 1 Introduction by technical problems such as lack of integration with systems in use within institutions, and educational data-mining efforts fail due to the absence of tools Formative assessment refers to the use of testing which are easy for non-experts to use (Romero and to allow both students to reflect on their own learn- Ventura, 2010). A key factor inhibiting the adoption ing and teachers to determine the needs of individ- of formative assessment technologies is staff time. ual students, or groups of students. This can also Teacher time is an especially scarce resource – those be described as assessment for learning. Formative who see the value of educational technology may still assessment is often contrasted with summative as- avoid full utilization for this reason; ”These are all sessment, described as assessment of learning, which great initiatives, but I’m running out of hours in a day uses testing as a means for summarizing the perfor- ... I’m in overload!” (Hall and Hall, 2010). Research mance of students and their level of knowledge at the by (Macfadyen and Dawson, 2012) highlights that in end of a course (Looney, 2011) (Black and Wiliam, order to overcome individual and group resistance to 2009). Despite the clear benefits of formative assess- innovation and change, planning processes must cre- ment as an effective teaching tool, it is infrequently ate conditions that allow participants to both think and used in practice. Also whilst VLEs (Virtual Learn- feel positively about change; ”conditions that appeal ing Environments) are widespread in higher educa- to both the heart and the head”. Without investing re- tion, their formative abilities are often severely under- sources for effective automated data analysis and vi- utilized (Blin and Munro, 2008). Even when change sualization, large quantities of data will not compel is not resisted by faculty staff, adoption of educational social or cultural change (Kotter and Cohen, 2002); technology tends to proceed at a slow pace, and often ”increasing observability of change is an effective innovation is driven by lone individuals deciding to strategy for reducing resistance” (Rogers, 1995). use technologies without backing from above (Rus- sell, 2009). Although perception of student expec- This paper builds upon and complements previous tation can provide positive incentive, technical barri- work and literature reviews such as (Gikandi et al., ers along with a lack of institutional support are key 2011), by taking a more integrative approach. We suppressing factors (King and Boyatt, 2015). Cur- attempt through the development a holistic theoretic rently available Education technologies are hampered framework,to arrive at the design of a system suitable for active use both as a tool for student and teacher and Thompson, 2007) in that we conceive of teachers improvement, and as a platform for further empirical not just in terms of the role they can play in providing research about the impact of various formative strate- feedback to students but also as individuals who can gies. Initially, multiple high impact journals in the benefit from feedback themselves. field of educational technology were identified, and the titles and abstract of all publications from the the last 5 years were manually examined. A number of 3 Feedback Processes and Their potentially relevant papers were identified and scruti- nized in further detail, and common subjects and ref- Data Collection Requirements erences were noted. Keywords related to these sub- jects were used to find further papers using academic We examine the specifics of feedback processes search engines. The process of reading papers, dis- below, considering issues related by their similar data- covered through references or search, continued re- requirements together. This view allows us to move cursively until a clear picture of a range of formative closer to the design of a real system. and learning practices emerged. A conceptual frame- work was developed to organize these practices by 3.1 Formative Feedback Principles time and individual, and the body of collected pa- pers was re-examined in the context of this frame- Synthesizing research literature, (Nicol and work to explore the data-collection requirements of Macfarlane-Dick, 2006) present seven princi- each of the identified practices. Recommendations ples, reordered for clarity here, arguing effective are made for implementation, and from these recom- formative feedback practice: mendations, the design of an extensible system to col- 1. delivers high quality information to students lect this data is presented. about their learning. 2. helps clarify what good performance is (goals, criteria, expected standards). 3. provides opportunities to close the gap between current and desired performance. 4. facilitates the 2 Classification of Feedback development of self-assessment (reflection) in learn- by User and Duration ing. 5. encourages positive motivational beliefs and self-esteem. 6. encourages teacher and peer dialogue Multiple researchers distinguish types of forma- around learning. 7. provides information to teachers tive assessment based on their duration. Allal and that can be used to help shape teaching. Schwartz (Allal and Schwartz, 1996) use the termi- The first three principles mirror (Wiliam and nology of “Level 1” and “Level 2’ formative assess- Thompson, 2007)’s theory of formative assessment, ments, which directly benefit students who are as- which emphasizes establishing where the learners are sessed as or use data gathered to benefit future in- in their learning, where they are going, and what structional activities or new groups of students respec- needs to be done to get them there. Black and tively. Alternatively, (Wiliam, 2006) distinguishes be- William, (Black and Wiliam, 1998) warn that class- tween short-, medium-, and long-cycle formative as- room cultures focused on rewards or grades encour- sessment, which operate within and between lessons, age students to game the system, avoid difficult tasks, within and between teaching units, and across mark- and where difficulties or poor results are encountered, ing periods, semesters or even years. In addition to ”retire hurt”. By 2004, this had been strengthened acting as a helpful framework within which to clas- in (Black et al., 2004) into an explicit recommenda- sify and organize research, this viewpoint is useful tion to adopt comment-only marking practices; ”Stu- as a design tool – collecting data required for longer- dents given marks are likely to see it as a way to com- term formative processes requires action over a sus- pare themselves with others; those given only com- tained period of time, and this affects the short-term ments see it as helping them to improve. The latter experience of new users. As discussed below, a sys- group outperforms the former.” A literature review by tem must show immediate value in order to have the (Gikandi et al., 2011) provides supporting studies and best chance at being widely adopted, and balancing explicitly reaffirms the above seven principles as ”an the conflict between supporting longer-term goals and essential condition for effective formative feedback”. maintaining accessibility is a design challenge that Whilst the above principles may be sufficient to deserves thinking about explicitly. In addition to dis- guide the behavior of teachers in conversation with tinguishing processes by time we also do so by the students in