Panhellenism and the Barbarian in Archaic and Classical Greece

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

PANHELLENISM AND THE BARBARIAN in Archaic and Classical Greece Lynette Mitchell PANHELLENISM AND THE BARBARIAN in Archaic and Classical Greece Lynette Mitchell The Classical Press of Wales First published in 2007 by The Classical Press of Wales 15 Rosehill Terrace, Swansea SA1 6JN Tel: +44 (0)1792 458397 Fax: +44 (0)1792 464067 www.classicalpressofwales.co.uk Distributor in the United States of America: ISD, LLC 70 Enterprise Dr., Suite 2, Bristol, CT 06010 Tel: +1 (860) 584–6546 www.isdistribution.com © 2007 The author All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. ISBN 978-1-910589-47-2 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Typeset by Ernest and Andrew Buckley, Clunton, Shropshire Printed and bound in the UK by Gomer Press, Llandysul, Ceredigion, Wales The Classical Press of Wales, an independent venture, was founded in 1993, initially to support the work of classicists and ancient historians in Wales and their collaborators from further afield. More recently it has published work initiated by scholars internationally . While retaining a special loyalty to Wales and the Celtic countries, the Press welcomes scholarly contributions from all parts of the world. The symbol of the Press is the Red Kite. This bird, once widespread in Britain, was reduced by 1905 to some five individuals confined to a small area known as ‘The Desert of Wales’ – the upper Tywi valley. Geneticists report that the stock was saved from terminal inbreeding by the arrival of one stray female bird from Germany. After much careful protection, the Red Kite now thrives – in Wales and beyond. For Stephen and James CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements ix Abbreviations xi List of figures xiii Introduction: Panhellenism and the barbarian xv 1. Panhellenism and the community of the Hellenes 1 2. Defining the boundaries of the Hellenic community 39 3. The symbolic community: utopia and dystopia 77 4. Cultural contestation 113 5. Time, space and war against the barbarian 169 Epilogue 203 Bibliography 215 General index 249 Index locorum 255 vii AckNowLEDGEMENTS This project was started during my BritishA cademy Post-doctoral Fellowship hosted by Oriel College, Oxford, and both the British Academy and Oriel College have continued to support it, particularly through the hospitality and kindness of Professor Ernst Nicholson of Oriel, and a British Academy small research grant which allowed me to travel regularly to Oxford, and to visit the National Archaeological Museum in Athens, and so to complete the monograph. The bulk of the book, however, was written in Exeter, and I owe a heavy debt of gratitude to colleagues for friendship and encouragement, and espe- cially to Stephen Mitchell, John Wilkins, Richard Seaford and David Braund, who read and commented on drafts. Peter Rhodes, Robin Osborne, Robert Parker and especially Chris Pelling also read the whole for me at various stages, and were generous with their time and their comments. In addition to all these, there are the many friends without whose kindness and support this book would not have seen the light of day, in particular Wendy Maull, Jenny Hocking, Caroline Huxtable and Shane Coombs. Especial thanks, however, must go to my family, to Stephen and to James. This book repre- sents a poor return for the way in which they have cherished and cared for me, but I dedicate it to them, with thanks. LGM May 2006 University of Exeter ix ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations for ancient authors and their works should be noted: [Apoll.] [Apollodorus], Bibliotheca Q.C. Quintus Curtius, History of Alexander Serv. Dan. Servius Danielis Periodicals are abbreviated as in L’Année Philologique, with the usual English divergences (e.g. AJP for AJPh). Note also the following abbreviations for modern sources (for full publishing details of items listed here, except standard collections of texts and reference works, refer to the bibliography): ARV 2 J.D. Beazley, Attic Red-figure Vase-painters, 2nd edn Buck C.D. Buck, The Greek Dialects, revised CAH Cambridge Ancient History Campbell D.A. Campbell, Greek Lyric: Sappho and Alcaeus, revised edition Davies EGF M. Davies, Epicorum Graecorum Fragmenta Davies PMGF M. Davies, Poetarum Melicorum Graecorum Fragmenta Der neue Pauly H. Cancik and H. Schneider (eds.) Der neue Pauly. Enzyklopädie der Antike DK H. Diels and W. Kranz, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker6 Fornara C.W. Fornara, Archaic Times to the End of the Pelopon- nesian War FGrHist Jacoby, Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker HCT A.W. Gomme, A. Andrewes and K.J. Dover, A Histor- ical Commentary on Thucydides, 5 vols. HW W.W. How and J. Wells, A Commentary on Herodotus, 2 vols. IG Inscriptiones Graecae, 14 vols. InvM O. Kern, Die Inschriften von Magnesia am Maeander IPriene F. Hiller, Inschriften von Priene ISE L. Moretti, Iscrizioni Storiche Ellenistiche Jouan/van Looy EF F. Jouan and H. van Looy, Euripide, vol. 8 (4 vols.):Fragments Kassel/Austin PCG R. Kassel and C. Austin (eds.) Poetae Comici Graeci, 8 vols. xi Abbreviations Kock Kock, Comicorum Atticorum Fragmenta, 3 vols. LIMC Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae Lobel/Page E. Lobel and D.L. Page, Poetarum Lesbiorum Fragmenta ML R. Meiggs and D.M. Lewis, A Collection of Greek Historical Inscriptions to the End of the Fifth Century, revised edn NAM National Archaeological Museum, Athens Nauck TrGF A. Nauck, Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, 2nd edn. OCD3 S. Hornblower and A. Spawforth (eds.) The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd edn OCT Oxford Classical Texts Page FGE D.L. Page, Further Greek Epigrams Page PMG D.L. Page, Poetae Melici Graeci Page SLG D.L. Page, Supplementum Lyricis Graecis Radt TrGF S. Radt, Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta RE Real-Encyclopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft RO P.J. Rhodes and R. Osborne, Greek Historical Inscriptions, 479–323 bc Staatsverträge H. Bengtson, Die Staatsverträge des Altertums, 3 vols., 2nd edn Syll.3 W. Dittenberger, Sylloge Inscriptionum Graecorum, 3rd edn Tod M. Tod, A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions, 2 vols. West M.L. West, Greek Lyric Poetry West IE/IE2 M.L. West, Iambi et Elegi Graeci I/II , 2nd edn West ThPhF M.L. West, Theognidis et Phocylidis Fragmenta et Adespota Quaedam Gnomica When referring to epigraphical sources, ‘=’ does not always mean direct equivalence, but that the section of the inscription discussed can be found in both places. Note on transliteration and translation I have used the Latinized equivalents for most Greek names, and, in the interests of accessibility, have used a transliterated form (with the nearest English equivalents) of a few more specialised terms and individual Greek words; in most cases, however, I have kept phrases and longer quotations in Greek. All translations are my own unless otherwise stated. xii LIST of FIguRES Page Fig. 1 Red-figured pelike, depicting Heracles slaying Bousiris, c. 470 bc. 56 Fig. 2 ‘Macmillan’ aryballos, Protocorinthian; pottery aryballos decorated in miniature with eighteen warriors, a hare- hunt and horse-race. 120 Fig. 3 Red-figured cup, depicting Greeks and Persians fighting, c. 490 bc. 127 Figs. 4a–c Moulded cantharus representing the heads of two females, one Greek and the other Negroid, janiform arrangement, c. 490 bc. 127 Figs. 5a–c Moulded cantharus depicting two heads, one female (European), one male (Negroid), janiform arrangement; inscribed: ‘I am Timyllus, as handsome as this face’, ‘I am Eronassa, very beautiful’. 133 Fig. 6 Pygmy rhyton, representing pygmy and crane, c. 460 bc. 133 Fig. 7 Pygmy rhyton, representing boy being eaten by crocodile, c. 460 bc. 134 Fig. 8 Moulded aryballos representing Negroid male (inscribed: ‘Leagrus is handsome’), 6th century. 134 Figs. 9a–b Attic red-figured oinochoe depicting naked Greek holding erect phallus and clothed Persian archer; inscribed: ‘I am Eurymedon. I stand bent over’, c. 460 bc. 135 Fig. 10 (and front cover) The Chicago Painter, pitcher (oinochoe) with Greek hoplite attacking Persian archer, Greek, classical period, c. 450 bc. 136 Figs. 11a–b The law against tyranny SEG( 12.87), thought to represent Demos being crowned by Democratia, 337/6 bc. 153 Fig. 12 Iran: Persepolis – Treasury. S portico of courtyard 17, depicting King with Crown Prince and attendants behind him. 155 xiii List of figures Fig. 13 Iran: Persepolis – Throne Hall, audience scene and guards of E doorway, N wall, W jamb. 155 Fig. 14 Iran: Persepolis – Throne Hall, enthroned King and attendant on E jamb, W doorway in S wall. 156 Fig. 15 Relief on IG ii2 112, the alliance between Athens, Arcadia, Achaea, Elis and Phlius. 156 Fig. 16 Iran: Persepolis, Harem of Xerxes, King and attendants on N doorway of the main hall, E jamb. 156 Poems by C.P. Cavafy ‘Waiting for the barbarians’ and ‘Returning from Greece’ from C.P. Cavafy: Collected Poems, translated by Edmund Keeley and Philip Sherrard, published Chatto and Windus. Reprinted by permission of the Random House Group. Copyright © from Collected Poems by C.P. Cavafy first published The Hogarth Press. Translation copyright © Edmund Keely and Philip Sherrard 1975 and 1984. Reproduced by permission of the estate of C.P. Cavafy c/o Rogers, Coleridge & White Ltd, 20 Powis Mews, London W11 1JN. xiv Introduction PANHELLENISM AND THE BARBARIAN Panhellenism: defining a phenomenon How we represent ourselves, both to ourselves and to others, informs the way that we act, the things that we do, and the choices that we make. From at least the mid-sixth century, the Hellenes imagined themselves as a community united by cult and kinship, and possibly language as well. They characterized themselves as a people who valued freedom, law and justice. Non-Greeks, on the other hand, did not share the same language or the same values as the Greeks and lived lives of luxury, as a consequence of which they were both enervated and enslaved to tyrannical rule.
Recommended publications
  • Hadrian and the Greek East

    Hadrian and the Greek East

    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
  • Institute of Archaeology

    Institute of Archaeology

    INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ARCL0005: INTRODUCTION TO GREEK ARCHAEOLOGY 2018-19, Year 1, 15 credits Module’s Turnitin ID: 3883957, Password: IoA1819 Deadlines for coursework: 8th November 2018, 9th January 2019 Coordinator: Dr. Borja Legarra Herrero. Email: [email protected] Office 103, tel. (0)20 7679 4607 Please see the last page of this document for important information about submission and marking procedures, or links to the relevant webpages. 2 1. OVERVIEW Course content: This course introduces students to the archaeology of the Greek world from the Bronze Age to the Hellenistic and Roman periods. The lectures are divided in sections, the first offering a set of frameworks for Greek archaeology; the following sections deal, respectively, with the development of cities and settlements through time, religion and cult, and cultural, social and economic practices. Course summary: (Term 1) Room 612, Fridays 11:00-13:00 5th October 1-2: Introduction, time and space. 12th October 3-4: Classical Archaeology: from the academic gentleman to the modern scientist (Essay 1 discussion) 19th October 5-6: The Bronze Age / the Early Iron Age 26th October 7-8: From the Archaic polis to the Classical city 2nd November 9-10: Hellenistic and Roman Greece (in the BM, includes an introduction to the Greek collections in the BM by curator Andrew Shapland) (10th November – Reading Week) 16th November 11-12: The Greeks and their neighbours / Greek sanctuaries and religion 23th November 13-14: Gender and the Greek house / Death and burial 30th November 15-16: Hands-on session (This will take place in Room 209) 7th December 17-18: warfare / Oligarchs, Tyrants and democrats 14th December 19-20: Trade and the economy / Conclusions (Essay 2 discussion) Basic texts Alcock, S.E.
  • Power and Nostalgia in Eras of Cultural Rebirth: the Timeless

    Power and Nostalgia in Eras of Cultural Rebirth: the Timeless

    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Scripps Senior Theses Scripps Student Scholarship 2013 Power and Nostalgia in Eras of Cultural Rebirth: The imelesT s Allure of the Farnese Antinous Kathleen LaManna Scripps College Recommended Citation LaManna, Kathleen, "Power and Nostalgia in Eras of Cultural Rebirth: The imeT less Allure of the Farnese Antinous" (2013). Scripps Senior Theses. Paper 176. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/176 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Scripps Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scripps Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POWER AND NOSTALGIA IN ERAS OF CULTURAL REBIRTH: THE TIMELESS ALLURE OF THE FARNESE ANTINOUS by KATHLEEN ROSE LaMANNA SUBMITTED TO SCRIPPS COLLEGE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS PROFESSOR MICHELLE BERENFELD PROFESSOR GEORGE GORSE MAY 3, 2013 Acknowledgements To Professor Rankaitis for making sure I could attend the college of my dreams and for everything else. I owe you so much. To Professor Novy for encouraging me to pursue writing. Your class changed my life. Don’t stop rockin! To Professor Emerick for telling me to be an Art History major. To Professor Pohl for your kind words of encouragement, three great semesters, and for being the only person in the world who might love Gladiator more than I do! To Professor Coats for being a great advisor and always being around to sign my many petition forms and for allowing me to pursue a degree with honors.
  • The Image of Athens in Diodorus Siculus

    The Image of Athens in Diodorus Siculus

    The Image of Athens in Diodorus Siculus Thomas A. Schmitz There’s no denying it: Diodorus Siculus has a bad press.In a contribution published 20 years ago, François Chamoux (who edited Diodorus for the Collection Budé) called him an “unloved historian” Chamoux [3], and there is still no sign that classicists are finding more love for his work. It would be all too easy to quote a couple of devastating judgments and angry remarks about him. And it is indeed difficult to like a historian who is careless enough, e.g., to have the Athenian general Chabrias first be assassinated in Abdera, in 375 bce (15.36.4), and then die gloriously in a battle off the island of Chios in 357 bce (16.7.4). Diodorus is certainly not a first-rate historian; his account lacks both penetrating critical acumen and factual reliability. Furthermore, Diodorus does not make up for his blunders and inaccuracies by providing readers a brilliant and compelling narrative or a rhetorical masterpiece; in fact, judgments about his style are even more negative than those about his qualities as a historian.1 It is not surprising, then, that for a long period of Diodorean scholarship, Quellenforschung was the only game in town, and it has been argued that Diodorus’ only value lies in the fact that he was too inept to alter his sources.2 Analysing Diodorus’ sources is indeed an important part of coming to grips with his text; if we look at the Library as a work of historiography, we need to know where Diodorus received the information he transmits.
  • Chapter 1: Introduction…………………………………………………………………………1

    Chapter 1: Introduction…………………………………………………………………………1

    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Art History THE HADRIANIC TONDI ON THE ARCH OF CONSTANTINE: NEW PERSPECTIVES ON THE EASTERN PARADIGMS A Dissertation in Art History by Gerald A. Hess © 2011 Gerald A. Hess Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2011 The dissertation of Gerald A. Hess was reviewed and approved* by the following: Elizabeth Walters Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Associate Professor of Art History Brian Curran Professor of Art History Craig Zabel Associate Professor of Art History Head, Department of Art History Donald Redford Professor of Classics and Mediterranean Studies *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii Abstract This dissertation is a study of the impact of eastern traditions, culture, and individuals on the Hadrianic tondi. The tondi were originally commissioned by the emperor Hadrian in the second century for an unknown monument and then later reused by Constantine for his fourth century arch in Rome. Many scholars have investigated the tondi, which among the eight roundels depict scenes of hunting and sacrifice. However, previous Hadrianic scholarship has been limited to addressing the tondi in a general way without fully considering their patron‘s personal history and deep seated motivations for wanting a monument with form and content akin to the prerogatives of eastern rulers and oriental princes. In this dissertation, I have studied Hadrian as an individual imbued with wisdom about the cultural and ruling traditions of both Rome and the many nations that made up the vast Roman realm of the second century.
  • Eran Almagor

    Eran Almagor

    ELECTRUM * Vol. 24 (2017): 123–170 doi:10.4467/20800909EL.17.025.7507 www.ejournals.eu/electrum PLUtaRCH AND THE PERSIANS Eran Almagor Abstract: This paper deals with the image of Persia and the Persians in the works of Plutarch of Chaeronea (c. 45–c. 120 AD), in both his Moralia and Lives. It explores this theme under several headings: Plutarch as: (a) a Greek Imperial author, (b) an author dealing with historical subjects, (c) a biographer, (d) a moralist, and (e) a philosopher and an essayist concerned with religious themes. Keywords: Plutarch, Persia/Persians, Second Sophistic, Aristides, Themistocles, Agesilaus, Ly- sander, Artaxerxes, Alexander the Great, Zoroastrianism, Magoi Our image of the ancient western view of Persia is largely shaped by Greek Imperial texts (from roughly 50 BC to 250 AD), and in particular by the way earlier works (like Herodotus) were received in this age, which eclipsed the previous periods in terms of the volume of works that survived.1 Among the authors and men of letters of this era, Plu- tarch of Chaeronea (c. 45–c. 120 AD) clearly stands out. Oftentimes, Plutarch provides us with information on Persia that we do not obtain elsewhere and which is derived from good but lost sources. Moreover, Plutarch is almost the only author who presents a rela- tively full account of the Persian Wars, from Themistocles and Aristides to Alexander, albeit in a biographical form and in a non-linear story, since the history is divided into separate works. A large proportion of the writings of this prolific writer (cf.
  • Arsinoe in the Peloponnese: the Ptolemaic Base on the Methana Peninsula

    Arsinoe in the Peloponnese: the Ptolemaic Base on the Methana Peninsula

    Arsinoe in the Peloponnese: the Ptolemaic base on the Methana peninsula D. Gill In the late nineteenth century, an Egyptian portrait head was recovered from the sea off the island of Aegina. The piece, clearly a royal portrait with double crown and broken uraeus, was inscribed with hieroglyphs and was quickly rec- ognised as a portrait of Ptolemy VI Philometor. It is not clear if the portrait had been displayed on the island of Aegina or somewhere bordering the Sa- ronic Gulf, or if it had been dumped in modern times as excess ballast from a passing sailing ship. One possibility is that the statue was linked to one of the Ptolemaic bases in the Aegean, perhaps that located at the nearby peninsula of Methana. The Methana Peninsula The Methana peninsula adjoins the eastern side of the Argolid, pointing into the Saronic Gulf (Figure 1). To the east lies the island of Poros, and to the north-east the island of Aegina. Methana is linked to the mainland by a nar- row isthmus, a feature which was fortified from at least the fifth century BCE. The peninsula is largely volcanic, and the main dome rises to 760 m. Mineral springs are found around the peninsula, on the north side at the modern set- tlement of Pausanias, named in honour of the second century AD Roman travel writer who described the peninsula, and on the east side at Loutra, the modern spa-town of Methana, much frequented by present-day Athenians. The historic settlement of Methana lay on the west side of the peninsula at the site of Palaiokastro near the modern village of Megalochori.
  • A New Inscription from Mygdonia Pantelis Nigdelis and Asterios Lioutas

    A New Inscription from Mygdonia Pantelis Nigdelis and Asterios Lioutas

    “First of the Hellenes in the Province”: A New Inscription from Mygdonia Pantelis Nigdelis and Asterios Lioutas N RECENT YEARS our knowledge of the Koinon of the Macedonians in the imperial age has been expanded and I enriched by a number of chance-found inscriptions, with the result that we have been able to penetrate certain aspects of its life that were hitherto unknown1 One such find is presented in this paper.2 It comes from the Palaiokastron hill archaeo- logical site approximately one kilometre northwest of the vil- lage of Mavrouda in the Langada district of the Prefecture of Thessaloniki, and it came to light in May 2001. 1 For earlier research see D. Kanatsoulis, “Tὸ Κοινὸν τῶν Mακεδόνων,” Μακεδονικά 3 (1953–55) 27–101; J. Deininger, Die Provinziallandtage der römi- schen Kaiserzeit von Augustus bis zum Ende des dritten Jahrhunderts n. Chr. (Munich/ Berlin 1965) 91–96; D. Kanatsoulis, “Oἱ Mακεδονιάρχαι τοῦ Kοινοῦ τῶν Mακεδόνων καὶ ἡ κοινωνικὴ θέσις αὐτῶν,” Μακεδονικά 13 (1973) 1–37. For more recent finds and studies see P. M. Nigdelis, “Oberpriester und Gymnasiarchen im Provinziallandtag Makedoniens: eine neue Ehren- inschrift aus Beroia,” Klio 77 (1995) 170–183; “Geminii und Claudii: Die Geschichte zweier führender Familien von Thessaloniki in der späteren Kaiserzeit,” in A. D. Rizakis (ed.), Roman Onomastics in the Greek East (Mele- temata 21 [Athens 1996]) 129–141; “Mακεδονικά Σύμμεικτα,” Τεκμήρια 1 (1995) 173–190; “Die Eordaier und das Koinon der Makedonen in einer neuen Ehreninschrift,” Hermes 128 (2000) 152–163 (with E. Kefalidou); and Επιγραφικά Θεσσαλονίκεια. Συμβολή στην πολιτική και κοινωνική Ιστορία της Αρχαίας Θεσσαλονίκης (Thessaloniki 2006) 73 ff.
  • The Statilii of Epidauros

    Classica Cracoviensia XV, 2012 MARCIN PAWLAK (NICOLAUS COPERNICUS UNIVERSITY, TORUŃ) THE STATILII OF EPIDAUROS T. Statilius Timocrates Memmianus, son of Lamprias was one of the most active figures in the life of the Peloponnese in the 2nd century AD. Although he never joined the inner elite of the empire, he did not become either an eques or a senator, he did achieve the highest honours in the province of Achaea. The successive steps of his career are well known to us from an honorific inscription with which he was honoured by the city of Argos1. T. Statilius Timocrates Memmianus was active both in Ar- gos and in trans-regional organisations. Among those organisations were the Panhellenion established on Hadrian’s initiative, the Council of the Amphictyons at Delphi and the Achaean koinon. We know that T. Statil- ius Timocrates Memmianus was one of the envoys sent on behalf of the Hellenes to the ‘emperors’. This information, included in the inscription mentioned above, is the only relatively certain chronological criterion which allows us to date T. Statilius Timocrates Memmianus’ career, al- beit very imprecisely. In researchers’ unanimous opinion, the emperors in question are Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus, who were co-emperors in the years 161-1692. T. Statilius Timocrates took upon himself, or was appointed for, the diplomatic mission probably as a young man at the be- ginning of his career. Although we cannot precisely place the date of his birth, it is usually believed to be the second half of the 2nd century AD3. 1 G IV 590. 2 Puech 1983: 29 believes that when Timocrates embarked on the diplomatic mission he was the high priest of the imperial cult.
  • Fifth Century B.C.E. War Memorials in Pausanias’ Periegesis

    FIFTH CENTURY B.C.E. WAR MEMORIALS IN PAUSANIAS’ PERIEGESIS by ALLENE MCDANIEL SEET (Under the Direction of Naomi J. Norman) ABSTRACT In my thesis, Pausanias’ Periegesis will form the base for an exploration of the context and meaning of fifth century B.C.E. Greek war memorials in the landscape of Greece in the second century C.E. By examining the context and function of war memorials in Pausanias’ Periegesis along with their material remains, I hope to draw conclusions about the different intentions of commemorating war, as well as the significance of a war memorial’s topographical location. Understanding these connections will lead to a wider understanding of the social memory of war in Greece, and particularly in Roman Greece of the second-century C.E. as constructed by Pausanias. INDEX WORDS: Pausanias, Persian Wars, Peloponnesian Wars, war memorial, Marathon, Salamis, Plataea, Athens FIFTH CENTURY B.C.E. WAR MEMORIALS IN PAUSANIAS’ PERIEGESIS by ALLENE MCDANIEL SEET B.A., Loyola University Chicago, 2010 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2014 © 2014 Allene McDaniel Seet All Rights Reserved FIFTH CENTURY B.C.E. WAR MEMORIALS IN PAUSANAIS’ PERIEGESIS by ALLENE MCDANIEL SEET Major Professor: Naomi J. Norman Committee: Charles Platter Mark Abbe Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia "[May, August, or December]" "[Year of Graduation]" iv DEDICATION A µνῆµα for Papaw, USMCR. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people who helped me while I wrote this thesis.
  • Herodes Atticus Commemorates Regilla Version 1.0

    1 1 Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics Making Space for Bicultural Identity: Herodes Atticus Commemorates Regilla Version 1.0 July 2008 Maud W. Gleason Stanford University Herodes and Regilla built a number of installations during their marriage, some of which represented their union in spatial terms. After Regilla died, Herodes reconfigured two of these structures, altering their meanings with inscriptions to represent the marriage retrospectively. This paper considers the implications of these commemorative installations for Herodes’ sense of cultural identity. © [email protected] 2 2 Making Space for Bicultural Identity: Herodes Atticus Commemorates Regilla 1 Herodes’ friend Favorinus owned a human toy, a black Indian slave, ‘Who would entertain them when they drank together, mixing Atticisms with Indicisms as he jibbered broken Greek.’ The linguistic hybritidy of this domestic slave contrasts with the linguistic purity of Herodes’ ‘Herakles’, a freeborn rustic strongman, clothed in wolf-skin, who spoke perfect Greek.2 The Attic hinterland was his teacher, or so he claimed; pure and healthy speech was hardly to be found in the city, where, by welcoming floods of paying students from barbarous parts, the Athenians had corrupted their own language. These two mascots represented two approaches to Greek language and identity. Heracles from the hinterland represented an inward-looking model that emphasized Greek uniqueness and the historical particularity of Attic tradition. The Indian slave gestured toward a more outward-looking, cosmopolitan model of Greek paideia as a game men of any race could play.3 Listening to the hybrid babble of their slave permitted Herodes and Favorinus to enjoy the sophisticated frisson of recognizing the Attic self in the barbarian ‘other’.
  • Inscriptions from the Sanctuary of Μητηρ Θεων Ουεγεινος

    Inscriptions from the Sanctuary of Μητηρ Θεων Ουεγεινος

    GEPHYRA 2 2005 103-113 Burak TAKMER* - Nuray GÖKALP** INSCRIPTIONS FROM THE SANCTUARY OF ΜΗΤΗΡ ΘΕΩΝ ΟΥΕΓΕΙΝΟΣ AT ZİNDAN MAĞARASI I1 Abstract: The three inscriptions presented here were found during the excavation of the sanctuary at Zindan Mağarası (Zindan cave). The first inscription shows that the sanctuary was dedicated to Meter Theôn Veginos and the second inscription indicates that the sanctu- ary was constructed during the reign of Marcus Aurelius. The authors suggest that the chief city of this rural sanctuary must have been Timbriada which can be located at the ruins in Asartepe in the vicinity of the modern county of Aksu in the Province of Isparta. From the last inscription we learn for the first time that the ancient city of Timbriada was a member of the Panhellenion created by the Emperor Hadrian in 131/2 A.D. The city was represented at the assembly of the Panhellenion through its citizens Samos and Abas, most probably during the reign of Emperor Marcus Aurelius. Zindan Mağarası lies some two kilometers east of Aksu/Isparta, on the right bank of the upper reaches of the Eurymedon locally known as Zindan Deresi (s. map). During the construction of a tunnel at Aksu in 1977, the rear wall of a sanctuary constructed of white limestone blocks and a statue of the god Eurymedon with an inscribed base and four other inscriptions were discovered. The architectural fragments of the sanctuary and the statue of the God were publi- shed by D. Kaya with a detailed geographical and historical introduction while the inscripti- ons were published by S.