Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan

Draft Report – July 2016

Prepared by: Boonslick Regional Planning Commission P.O. Box 429, Warrenton, MO 63383

(636) 456-3473

www.boonslick.org

This Page Intentionally Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS ...... i CONTRIBUTORS ...... i Warren County Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee ...... i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... ii PREREQUISITES ...... iv

1 Introduction And Planning Process ...... 1.1

2 Planning Area Profile And Capabilities ...... 2.1

3 Risk Assessment ...... 3.1

4 Mitigation Strategy ...... 4.1 5 Plan Maintenance Process ...... 5.1

Appendices; A, B, C

CONTRIBUTORS

Warren County Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee

Jurisdictional Representatives

Aaron Jones Assistant Superintendent NA Warren County R-III School District Ralph Hellebusch Administrator NA Warren County Ambulance District Greg Houdyshell Chief of Police Police Department City of Warrenton

Hubie Kluesner Southern District Commissioner NA Warren County

Ron MacKnight Fire Chief Fire Protection City of Wright City District Dan Hampson Northern District Commissioner NA Warren County

Ruth Walter Administrator Health Department Warren County

Brendan Mahon, PhD Assistant Superintendent NA Washington School District

Name Title Department Jurisdiction / Agency / Organization Jamie Faust Fire Chief Fire Protection Marthasville Fire Protection District District Matt Flake Sanitarian Health Department Warren County

Al Jacob Owner Missouri Valley Warren County Levee District Tim Schroeder Trustee Board of Trustees Lake Sherwood

Carla Heggemann Clerk NA Innsbrook

Trish Dunn Trustee Board of Trustees Innsbrook

Ed Varno Trustee Board of Trustees Lake Sherwood

Anita Contreras Director NA Warren County Developmental Disabilities Board Jack Sanford Assistant Superintendent NA Wright City R-II School District

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The purpose of natural hazard mitigation is to reduce loss of life and property by lessening the impact of natural disasters. Hazard Mitigation Plan forms the foundation for a community's long- term strategy to reduce disaster losses and break the cycle of disaster damage, reconstruction, and repeated damage. The Boonslick Regional Planning Commission on behalf of Warren County and participating jurisdictions developed a Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan that was initially approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in 2004.

The plan was prepared pursuant to the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000). In accordance with DMA 2000 requirements, Warren County and participating jurisdictions must update the plan every 5 years. The most recent past multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan for Warren County was updated and approved dated August 2011.

The Warren County Hazard Mitigation Plan is a multi-jurisdictional plan that represents several local governments within the county. The participating jurisdictions from the 2011 plan remain the same. The following communities participated in plan development and are represented by the plan through formal adoption:

Warren County Village of Innsbrook City of Marthasville

Village of Pendleton City of Truesdale City of Warrenton

City of Wright City Warren County R-III School Wright City R-II School District District

Gasconade County R-II Washington School District School District

In addition to the local governments and school districts, several other entities were contacted to provide support and contribute to the mitigation strategy. These include:

Alliance Water Ameren Electric American Red Cross

CenturyLink Charter Communications Crider Center

Cuivre River Electric Co-Op Radio KWRE St. John’s Mercy Hospital

Tri-County Levee District Warren County Record Warrenton Economic Development

Wright City Economic Development

The planning process followed the methodology prescribed by FEMA, beginning with the formation of a Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee (MPC) comprised of key stakeholders from Warren County, participating jurisdictions, state agencies, and other several private non-profit entities.

The MPC updated the risk assessment that identified and profiled hazards that pose a risk to County A and analyzed jurisdictional vulnerability to these hazards. The MPC also examined the capabilities in place to mitigate the hazard damages, with emphasis on changes that have occurred since the previously approved plan was adopted. The MPC determined that the planning area is vulnerable to several hazards that are identified, profiled, and analyzed in this plan. Riverine and flash flooding, winter storms, severe thunderstorms/hail/lightning/high winds, and tornadoes are among the hazards that historically have had a significant impact.

Based upon the risk assessment, the MPC updated goals for reducing risk from hazards. The goals are listed below:

GOAL 1 – Protect the lives and livelihoods of all citizens

GOAL 2 – Manage growth through sustainable principles and practices

GOAL 3 – Ensure continued operation of government and emergency functions during a disaster

To advance the identified goals, the MPC developed recommended mitigation actions, which are iii detailed in Chapter 4 of this plan. The MPC developed an implementation plan for each action, which identifies priority level, background information, and ideas for implementation, responsible agency, timeline, cost estimate, potential funding sources, and more.

PREREQUISITES

44 CFR requirement 201.6(c)(5): The local hazard mitigation plan shall include documentation that the plan has been formally adopted by the governing body of the jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan. For multi-jurisdictional plans, each jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan must document that it has been formally adopted.

This plan has been reviewed by and adopted with resolutions or other documentation of adoption by all participating jurisdictions and schools. The documentation of each adoption is included in Appendix A, and a model resolution is included on the following page.

The following jurisdictions participated in the development of this plan and have adopted the multi- jurisdictional plan.

Warren County Village of Innsbrook City of Marthasville

Village of Pendleton City of Truesdale City of Warrenton

City of Wright City Warren County R-III School Wright City R-II School District District

Gasconade County R-II Washington School District School District

Model Resolution

Resolution #

Adopting the Warren County Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan

Whereas, the (Name of Government/District/Organization seeking FEMA approval of hazard mitigation plan) recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property within our community; and

Whereas, undertaking hazard mitigation actions will reduce the potential for harm to people and property from future hazard occurrences; and

Whereas, the U.S. Congress passed the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (“Disaster Mitigation Act”) emphasizing the need for pre-disaster mitigation of potential hazards;

Whereas, the Disaster Mitigation Act made available hazard mitigation grants to state and local governments; and

Whereas, an adopted Local Hazard Mitigation Plan is required as a condition of future funding for mitigation projects under multiple FEMA pre- and post-disaster mitigation grant programs; and

Whereas, the (Name of Government/District/Organization) fully participated in the hazard mitigation planning process to prepare this Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan; and

Whereas, the Missouri State Emergency Management Agency and the Federal Emergency Management Agency Region VII officials will review the “County A Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan,” and approved it as to form and content; and

Whereas, the (Name of Government/District/Organization) desires to comply with the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act and to augment its emergency planning efforts by formally adopting the County A Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan; and

Whereas, adoption by the governing body for the (Name of Government/District/Organization) demonstrates the jurisdictions’ commitment to fulfilling the mitigation goals outlined in this Multi- Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan; and

Whereas, adoption of this legitimizes the plan and authorizes responsible agencies to carry out responsibilities under the plan;

Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the (Name of Government/District/Organization) has adopted the “Warren County Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan” as an official plan.

Date:

Certifying Official:

This Page Intentionally Blank

1 INTRODUCTION AND PLANNING PROCESS

1 INTRODUCTION AND PLANNING PROCESS ...... 1 1.1 Purpose...... 1 1.2 Background and Scope ...... 1

1.3 Plan Organization ...... 2

1.4 Planning Process ...... 3 1.4.1 Multi-Jurisdictional Participation ...... 5 1.4.2 The Planning Steps ...... 6

1.1 Purpose

Hazard mitigation is “any action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from natural hazards." The work done to minimize the impact of natural hazard events to life and property is called Hazard Mitigation. Warren County and its participating jurisdictions and school districts developed this multi-jurisdictional local hazard mitigation plan update to reduce future losses from hazard events. 1.2 Background and Scope

This document is the 5-year update of a plan that was approved on January 5, 2012. The plan and the update were prepared pursuant to the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-390) and the implementing regulations set forth by the Interim Final Rule published in the Federal Register on February 26, 2002, (44 CFR §201.6) and finalized on October 31, 2007. (Hereafter, these requirements and regulations will be referred to collectively as the Disaster Mitigation Act or DMA). The regulations established the requirements for local hazard mitigation plans are in the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Act (Public Law 93-288). This plan update results in eligibility for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Hazard Mitigation Grant programs.

The following local governments and school districts participated in both the original plan as well as the plan update, which allows them to adopt the plan and secure eligibility for Hazard Mitigation Grant funding they could not otherwise obtain.

• City of Marthasville • Village of Innsbrook • Village of Pendleton

• City of Truesdale • City of Warrenton • City of Wright City

• Gasconade County R-II • Warren County R-III • Wright City R-II School School District School District District

1.1

• School District of • Warren County Washington

In addition to securing grant funding eligibility, the plan is useful for incorporating hazard mitigation planning and principals into other documents such as zoning regulations and land use plans. 1.3 Plan Organization

The latest update (2016) document involved review, evaluation, and amendment of the existing plan. It addresses the same natural hazards that were addressed in the original plan plus additional hazards as related to Public Health. The select few man-made hazards that were included in the 2011 update are carried forward into this plan, plus Radiation Release was added as a man-made hazard.

• Section 1: Introduction and Planning Process

• Section 2: Planning Area Profile and Capabilities

• Section 3: Risk Assessment

• Section 4: Mitigation Strategy

• Section 5: Plan Implementation and Maintenance

• Appendices

It should be noted that SEMA directed a new formatting style for the updated plan which required some content to be rewritten and reorganized. However, this resulted in no significant changes to the content of the plan from the 2011 update. The table below illustrates only significant changes made to the content of the plan.

Table 1.1. Changes Made in Plan Update

Section Summary of Changes Made 1 – Introduction and Planning Process Reorganized and made more concise 2 – Planning Area Profile and Capabilities Reorganized and data updated to current 3 – Risk Assessment Reorganized and all hazard event data was updated and new risk vulnerability analysis was performed using new data. Radiation Release was added as a man-made hazard. 4 – Mitigation Strategy Reorganized and three new actions were added as Public Health issues to be addressed; 1.3.5 – Identify public health issues and identify ways to promote healthy life style changes, 1.3.6 – Identify causes of disease and promote measures to control spread of disease in case of emergency such as ; reduce vectors, increase awareness of foodborne illness hazards due to spoilage and

1.2

Section Summary of Changes Made contamination., 1.7.4 – Identify community health disparities and their effects on post disaster population health, i.e., access to care, messaging, translation services, and mental/behavioral health services.

5 – Plan Implementation and Reorganized and updated Maintenance

1.4 Planning Process

44 CFR Requirement 201.6(c)(1): [The plan shall document] the planning process used to develop the plan, including how it was prepared, who was involved in the process, and how the public was involved.

Warren County contracted with the Boonslick Regional Planning Commission (BRPC) through SEMA’s Scope of Work agreement and participated fully in the preparation of the original 2009 plan and the 2011 update. BRPC’s responsibilities under this scope of work include the following;

• Assist in establishing the original Mitigation Planning Committee (MPC) as defined by the Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA), and assist Warren County in keeping the committee members current.

• Assess the adherence to the process set forth in the previously approved plan for maintenance, that is, did the MPC meet regularly as specified in the prior plan and explain why or why not the process was followed.

• Ensure the updated plan meets the DMA requirements and follows the most current planning guidance of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA.

• Facilitate the entire plan development process.

• Identify the data that MPC participants could provide and conduct the research and documentation necessary to augment that data.

• Assist in soliciting public input.

• Produce the draft and final plan update in a FEMA-approved document, and coordinate the reviews of FEMA and the Missouri State Emergency Management Agency (SEMA).

1.3

Table 1.2. Jurisdictional Representatives of the Warren County MPC

Name Title Department Jurisdiction / Agency / Organization Mike Daniels Warren County EMD Emergency Warren County Management Toni Eversmeyer Administrator Planning and Warren County Zoning Mike Eskew Chief of Police Police City of Wright City Department Aaron Jones Assistant Superintendent NA Warren County R-III School District Ralph Hellebusch Administrator NA Warren County Ambulance District Greg Houdyshell Chief of Police Police City of Warrenton Department Hubie Kluesner Southern District Commissioner NA Warren County

Ron MacKnight Fire Chief Fire Protection City of Wright City District Dan Hampson Northern District Commissioner NA Warren County

Ruth Walter Administrator Health Warren County Department Brendan Mahon, PhD Assistant Superintendent NA Washington School District

Jamie Faust Fire Chief Fire Protection Marthasville Fire Protection District District Matt Flake Sanitarian Health Warren County Department Al Jacob Owner Missouri Valley Warren County Levee District Tim Schroeder Trustee Board of Trustees Lake Sherwood

Carla Haggemann Clerk NA Innsbrook

Trish Dunn Trustee Board of Trustees Innsbrook

Ed Varno Trustee Board of Trustees Lake Sherwood

Anita Contreras Director NA Warren County Developmental Disabilities Board Jack Sanford Assistant Superintendent NA Wright City R-II School District

1.4

1.4.1 Multi-Jurisdictional Participation

44 CFR Requirement §201.6(a)(3): Multi-jurisdictional plans may be accepted, as appropriate, as long as each jurisdiction has participated in the process and has officially adopted the plan.

The Disaster Mitigation Act requires that each jurisdiction participate in the planning process and officially adopt the multi-jurisdictional hazard mitigation plan. A Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee (MPC) was created that includes representatives from each participating jurisdiction, departments of the county, school districts and other agencies responsible for making decisions in the plan and agreeing upon the final contents. The Warren County Emergency Management Director, along with BRPC, solicited membership in the MPC through updated distribution lists of jurisdictional stakeholders and advertised for additional stakeholders through display ads in local newspapers. In addition, BRPC and the Warren County EMD reached out through press releases to local newspapers and radio stations, and posted bulletins at strategic locations. Data Collection Questionnaires were distributed to the participating jurisdictions. The private community of Lake Sherwood, although not incorporated, also participated on the MPC. A list of all jurisdictions invited to participate is included in Appendix B.

Once formed, the MPC contributed to the planning process by; providing facilities for meetings, attending and participating in meetings, collecting and reporting data and progress of current mitigation actions, determining new mitigation strategies, reviewing drafts, and coordinating and assisting with public involvement and plan adoptions. Jurisdictions are also required to remove from further consideration any mitigation plans that are no longer valid because of impracticality, inappropriateness, not being cost-effective, or otherwise not feasible. Logs of time donated to the MPC were also created.

Minimum participation of each jurisdiction represented require that the participant provide information to support the plan update through at least one of the following methods:

• Appoint a representative to attend the scheduled meetings; • Alternately schedule meetings with BRPC staff liaison for data collection, risk assessment and mitigation strategies; or • Communicate with BRPC staff through email concerning data collection, risk assessment and mitigation strategies. • Formally adopt the mitigation plan.

Table 1.3. Jurisdictional Participation in Planning Process

Jurisdiction Kick-off Meeting Data Collection Update/Develop Meeting #2 Questionnaire Mitigation Actions Response Warren County Y Y Y Y City of Warrenton Y Y Y Y City of Wright City Y Y Y Y City of Marthasville Y Y Y Y Village of Innsbrook Y Y Y Y Village of Pendleton Y Y Y Y Lake Sherwood (Private Community) Y Y Y Y

1.5

Warren County R-III Y Y Y Y School District of Washington Y Y Y Y Gasconade County R-II Y Y Y Y

1.4.2 The Planning Steps The initial scoping process of the planning effort consisted of soliciting local jurisdictions for a representative to attend the initial public meeting. When available, original committee members were invited directly. This effort was conducted in March of 2016 and consisted of detailed email invitations from the Warren County EMD explaining the importance of the planning process and jurisdictional participation. Notices were posted at strategic locations, a press release issued, display advertisements placed in local papers, and announcements posted on the BRPC and Warren County EMA websites in an attempt to solicit additional members from the public at large.

The kick-off meeting was held on March 30 at the Warren County Emergency Operations center in Warrenton with 16 jurisdiction and stakeholders present. The plan update process was discussed along with the importance of planning participation, the status of action plans was reviewed, and next steps were explained such as email follow-up notices, questionnaire distribution, and contact with the Warren County EMD and Boonslick Regional Planning Commission personnel. The MPC further established milestones and meeting dates.

A final meeting was held on August 4, 2016 to review and approve the draft update plan. The MPC and the public were invited to review the plan that was posted to the Warren County EMA and BRPC websites weeks before the meeting. Printed copies of the plan were also available for review at the Warren County Clerk’s office, the office of the Warren County Emergency Management Agency, and the offices of the Boonslick Regional Planning Commission. Attendees were invited to participate in person when possible, however, when not possible, they would be kept in the loop via email updates and personal phone calls if necessary. Everyone was encouraged to engage others in the process. Email updates were distributed when necessary to ensure all were informed. The email invitations, public notices, press releases, display ads, web postings, sign-in sheets, minutes, and agenda are included in Appendix B.

Table 1.4. Schedule of MPC Meetings

Meeting Topic Date Informational Planning meetings with the Warren County EMD to finalize list of February and Meeting committee members and review the action plan work sheet. March 2016 Planning Review HMP Background, planning process, schedule, and March 30, 2016 Meeting 1 review/discussion of Goals, Objectives, and Action Plan. Planning Final review and approval of the updated plan. August 4, 2016 Meeting 2

Coordination with FEMA Risk MAP Project The following figure shows the status of Risk Mapping activity in Warren County. Areas of Warren County prone to levee failure and flooding/flash flooding are addressed in Section III.

1.6

Figure 1.1. Risk Map Project Map

Integration of Other Data, Reports, Studies, and Plans Emergency Operations procedures from Warren County and other jurisdictions, including dam and levee owners where available, were consulted as necessary.

Assess the Hazards; Identify and Profile Hazards The Warren County Emergency Management Director along with BRPC staff reviewed the natural and man-made disasters included in the 2011 plan and those found in the 2013 Missouri State plan. This exercise was essentially a review of the existing hazards identified and an informal discussion of their status; that is, should be remain in our plan, be eliminated from our plan, and/or should other hazards be added. In addition, BRPC and the Warren County EMD reviewed disaster declarations for the county.

The findings were presented to the MPC at the kick-off meeting in March where the committee spent some time discussing the hazards. At the suggestion of one of the committee members, a new hazard was added to address radiation leakage from the Callaway Nuclear plant. At that same meeting, the MPC was queried as to what additional pertinent data may be available from other plans.

1.7

Assess the Problem; Identify Assets and Estimate Losses Web resources, existing reports and plans, Data Collection Questionnaires, and existing geographic information systems (GIS) layers were used to compile information about past hazard events. Hazard profiles from the original plan were reviewed for applicability and revised accordingly. The revised hazard profiles detail the location, previous occurrences, probability of future occurrences, and magnitude/severity of each hazard. In many instances vulnerability estimates were not available for local jurisdictions in which case, they were taken from the 2013 state plan as the best and most recent data available.

The MPC reviewed the goals from the previously approved plan and changes that were made to the 2016 plan were summarized and annotated as to the reason for the change. This activity was conducted at the first meeting where consensus was achieved that they remain valid for the updated plan. The Goals for the 2016 Updated Plan remain the same as those of the 2011 plan.

• GOAL 1: Protect the lives and livelihoods of all citizens

• GOAL 2: Employ sustainable principles and practices to enhance mitigation effectiveness.

• GOAL 3: Ensure continued operation of government and emergency functions during a disaster.

Review Possible Mitigation Actions and Activities During the kick-off meeting in March, the team reviewed the mitigation strategy from the previously approved plan and proposed the following new actions which were prioritized using a modified STAPLEE (Social, Technical, Administrative, Political, Legal, Economic, Environmental);

• 1.3.5 – Identify public health issues and identify ways to promote healthy life style changes • 1.3.6 – Identify causes of disease and promote measures to control spread of disease in case of emergency such as ; reduce vectors, increase awareness of foodborne illness hazards due to spoilage and contamination. • 1.7.4 – Identify community health disparities and their effects on post disaster population health, i.e., access to care, messaging, translation services, and mental/behavioral health services. • The radiation leak hazard, Nuclear Power Plant Radiation Release, is already addressed by the Warren County Emergency Management Agency’s EOP which proscribes evacuation procedures and routes.

Draft an Action Plan Based on information obtained at the kick-off meeting, the revised STAPLEE, and through various forms of communication with jurisdictions, BRPC and the Warren County EMD drafted an action plan. This plan was presented to the MPC at a second meeting in August of 2016 wherein their approval was solicited and obtained. Documents and plans reviewed include the Warren County Comprehensive Plan (1995), County Emergency Operations Plan (2012), Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS, 2014), reports from the National Flood Insurance Program’s Community Information System, Missouri State Hazard Mitigation

1.8

Plan 2010, HAZUS data as well as other data from state and federal agencies. This information was used to improve the plan’s risk assessment and to validate plan’s goals, objectives, and mitigation actions. The public was invited to this meeting as well via BRPC and EMA websites and invited to comment before adoption.

Table below shows the list of existing plans, studies, reports, and technical information reviewed and further incorporated into the plan.

Table 1.5. Existing Plans, Studies, and Reports

Existing Plan/ studies/ Does the jurisdiction have Reviewed? Method of incorporation reports etc. this plan technical (Yes/No) into the hazard document? (Yes/No) mitigation plan Warren County Yes Yes Land uses, Master Plan 2003 environmental issues. County Emergency Yes Yes Mitigation Operations Plan 2012 measures, Inventory of critical/key/essenti CEDS 2014 Yes Yes Provides general demographic, economic, and Transportation Plan Yes Yes Existing road networks and transportation incidents Threat and Hazard Yes Yes THIRA mitigation plans Identification and Risk were reviewed to assure Assessment (THIRA) compatibility Warren County Yes Yes Minimize the harmful Storm Water effects of erosion, Regulation sedimentation, and storm

Adopt the Plan Following approval by the MPC, the draft plan was distributed to the adopting jurisdictions via mail and e-mail. The MPC and the general public were also given one additional opportunity review the plan before adoption. BRPC tracked the adoption process for each jurisdiction and monitored public comment. In order to secure buy-in and officially implement the plan, the governing bodies of each participating jurisdiction adopted the plan. Copies of resolutions of adoption are included in Appendix A.

Implement, Evaluate, and Revise the Plan Part of the plan draft development included an outline of plan maintenance which was discussed and accepted by the MPC. The process includes reviews annually and in the wake of any significant hazard event as well as provisions for the 5-year update process.

1.9

This Page Intentionally Blank

1.10

2 PLANNING AREA PROFILE AND CAPABILITIES

2 PLANNING AREA PROFILE AND CAPABILITIES ...... 1 2.1 Warren County Planning Area Profile ...... 1 2.1.2 Geography, Geology and Topography ...... 4 2.1.3 Climate ...... 6 2.1.4 Population/Demographics ...... 6 2.1.5 History ...... 8 2.1.6 Occupations ...... 8 2.1.7 Agriculture ...... 8 2.1.8 FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grants in Warren County ...... 9 2.2 Jurisdictional Profiles and Mitigation Capabilities ...... 9 2.2.1 Unincorporated Warren County ...... 9 2.2.2 Village of Innsbrook ...... 13 2.2.3 City of Marthasville ...... 16 2.2.4 Village of Pendleton ...... 19 2.2.5 City of Truesdale ...... 21 2.2.6 City of Warrenton ...... 24 2.2.7 City of Wright City ...... 27 2.2.8 Public School District Profiles and Mitigation Capabilities ...... 32

2.1 Warren County Planning Area Profile Warren County’s population in the 2010 census was 32,513. This is a 25% increase in population since the 2000 census population figure of 24,525. During the same decade, Missouri’s population increased 7% and the United States population increased by 9%. Warren County is one of the 5 fastest growing counties in the state.

Table 2.1. Population Increase Comparison

2000 2010 Increase %

Warren County 24,525 32,513 7,988 25%

Missouri 5,595,211 5,988,927 393,716 7%

United States 281,421,906 308,745,538 27,323,632 9% Source: U.S. Bureau of Census

The 2000 census figures show Warren County’s median home value as $101,600. By the 2010 census, the median home value had climbed to $161,000, or 37%. This compares to Missouri’s median home value in 2000 of $86,900, $137,000 in 2010, for a 37% increase. This compares to the median home value of $111,800 for the United States in the 2000 census, $188,400 in the 2010 census, for a 41% increase in median home values nationwide.

2.1

Table 2.2. Median Home Value for Warren County

2000 2010 Increase % Warren County $ 101,600 $ 161,000 $ 59,400 37% Missouri $ 86,900 $ 137,700 $ 50,800 37% United States $ 111,800 $ 188,400 $ 76,600 41% Source: U.S. Bureau of Census

Median household income for Warren County compares similarly with state and national figures as well. The 2000 census data puts median household income for Warren County at $41,016. The 2010 census data places the county’s median household income at $52,513 for a 22% increase since 2000. Missouri’s median household income increased by 21% over the same decade; beginning in 2000 at $37,934 and ending in 2010 at $47,764. For the United States, the median household income in 2000 was $41,994, in 2010 it was $53,482; a 21% increase. Warren County’s median household income is above the Missouri median and below the median household income for the nation.

Table 2.3. Median Household Income Comparison

2000 2010 Increase % Warren County $ 41,016 $ 52,513 $ 11,497 22% Missouri $ 37,934 $ 47,764 $ 9,830 21% United States $ 41,994 $ 53,482 $ 11,488 21% Source: U.S. Bureau of Census

2.2

Figure 2.1. Map of Warren County, Missouri

2.3

2.1.2 Geography, Geology and Topography The county is just west of St. Charles County. The Missouri River forms the border for the southern edge of the county with Franklin and Gasconade counties on the opposite side of the river. Montgomery County lies to the west of Warren County and Lincoln County to the northeast.

Figure 2.2. Warren County Roads and Surrounding Counties

Lincoln County Montgomery County

St. Charles County

Gasconade County Franklin

County Source: Boonslick Regional Planning Commission

Warren County encompasses approximately 429 square miles, or 274,560 acres, including 9.2 square miles of water. The Missouri River floodplain blankets the southern edge of the county in alluvium (silt, sand and gravel) up to 150 feet thick. Topography varies from river bottoms to rough hilly terrain to rolling hills and prairie as one moves north from the Missouri River. Warren County includes the following watersheds;

The county is mostly rural with pockets of urban areas in and around the county seat of Warrenton, Marthasville, Truesdale, and Wright City. The fastest growing areas of the county are adjacent to Interstate 70 which bisects the county. Land use is primarily agricultural with some light manufacturing.

The three main watersheds that cross Warren County are the Lower Missouri River and its tributaries, the Cuivre River Watershed, and the Perique-Piasa Watershed. The map below shows the Warren County watersheds and the communities within them.

2.4

Figure 2.3. Warren County Watersheds

There is a variety of soils that interfaces the county and fosters a variety of productivity. The deep loess soils provide a growing medium for cultivating crops, livestock, and timber. In addition, most of the soils are suitable for many urban uses such as residential and commercial site development. The map below shows the topography of the Boonslick Region with Warren County the middle of the three.

Figure 2.4. Topographic Relief of Boonslick Region (Montgomery, Lincoln, Warren)

Moderately Dissected Plains

Smooth Plains

Highly Dissected Plateaus

Flat Lowlands

Source: Boonslick Regional Planning Commission 2.5

2.1.3 Climate The climate is generally moderate. Temperatures, according to the National Weather Service (NWS) station at Lambert St. Louis Airport, range from an average high of 89 degrees in July to an average low of 21 degrees in January. Rainfall averages 4 inches per month during March through July while the average is 3 inches per month during September through December. January and February average only 2 inches, while snowfall averages 3-5 inches in the winter months. Average wind speeds range from 9 miles per hour in July to 13 miles per hour in March. Winter and spring winds are from the west northwest while summer winds blow primarily from the south

2.1.4 Population/Demographics Warren County’s population slowly declined from the turn of the century until 1950 and then began growing at an average rate until the 1970s. Between 1970 and 1980 the county’s growth rate spiked at a 54% increase due to improved access to the St. Louis area via Interstate 70. From 1980 to 1990 the county grew by 4,634 people or 31%, and from 1990 to 2000 the region grew by 4,991 people or 27% to a total population of 24,525. By the 2010 census, the population of Warren County grew to 32,513. Of Missouri’s 114 counties, Warren County ranked 3rd in percent of population increase between 2000 and 2010. Note that population figures for Pendleton and Three Creeks were not available from the 2000 census. Also note that Foristell’s city center is in St. Charles County wherein most of the city’s population resides.

Table 2.4. Warren County Population 2000 – 2010 by Community

2000-2010 2000-2010 Jurisdiction 2000 Population 2010 Population #Change %Change Total Warren County 24,525 32,513 7,988 33% Foristell* 27 260 233 863% Innsbrook 469 552 83 18% Marthasville 837 1,136 299 36% Pendleton 43

Truesdale 397 732 335 84% Warrenton 5,281 7,880 2,599 49% Wright City 1,532 3,119 1,587 104% Warren County –Unincorporated 15,982 18,785 2,803 18% Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Decennial Census,*population does not include the portions of these cities in adjacent counties

According to the 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, in Warren County, 6.4% of the population is under 5 years of age. This compares to 6.3% for the state and 6.4% for the nation. The same source cites Warren County population age 65 or older as 15.7% which compares to 14.6% for Missouri and 13.7% for the nation. Again, using the same source, Warren Countyhas an estimated 12,337 households with an average household size of 2.64. That compares to Missouri’s estimated 2,361,232 households with an average size of 2.48 and the nation’s number of households at 116, 211,092 with an average household size of 2.63.

The University of South Carolina developed an index to evaluate and rank the ability to respond to, cope with, recover from, and adapt to disasters. The index synthesizes 30 socioeconomic variables which research literature suggests contribute to reduction in a community’s ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from hazards. SoVI® data sources include primarily those from the United States Census Bureau. The lower the SoVI, the better the county ranks in its resilience to hazard events. The SoVI for the Warren County planning area is -2.599558. In comparison to the national average, Warren County

2.6

is at 14.44%.

The map below shows the SoVI for each county within the United States. Warren County is colored blue signifying a low SoVI. SoVI is included in the Missouri 2013 Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Figure 2.5. Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards

The table below illustrates additional demographic and economic indicators for Warren County that comprise the SoVI.

Table 2.5. Warren County Unemployment, Poverty, Education, and Language Percentage Demographics

Jurisdiction Total in Percent of Percent of Percentage Percentage Percentage of Labor Population Families of of Population population Force Unemployed Below the Population (Bachelor’s (spoken Poverty (High degree or language other Level School higher) than English) graduate) Warren County 16,778 6.7% 9.6% 45.9% 3.2% 2.9% Innsbrook 568 4.6% 0.4% 50.0% 0.0% 1.3% Marthasville 943 2.7% 2.7% 41.2% 7.4% 1.1% Pendleton 20 0.0% 14.3% 100.0% 0.0% 4.5%

Truesdale 620 16.5% 37.2% 59.0% 0.0% 5.0% Warrenton 5,779 10.4% 15.8% 39.6% 4.7% 5.7% 2.7

Jurisdiction Total in Percent of Percent of Percentage Percentage Percentage of Labor Population Families of of Population population Force Unemployed Below the Population (Bachelor’s (spoken Poverty (High degree or language other Level School higher) than English) graduate) Wright City 2,390 11.2% 15.3% 31.9% 0.0% 2.9% Missouri 3,054,519 5.3% 11.1% 30.0% 9.5% 4.2% United States 158,965,511 5.8% 11.2% 29.5% 9.6% 4.3% Source: U.S. Census, 2014 American Community Survey, 5-year Estimates.

2.1.5 History In 1795 the renowned Kentucky hunter, Colonel Daniel Boone, established the first American colony in what is now Warren County. With the help of his son-in-law, Flanders Callaway, Callaway Post settlement was built near the current town of Marthasville. Boone family activities included surveying a road that helped link St. Louis and St. Charles with the interior of Missouri. The Boones used the road to transport manufactured salt to St. Louis and the road became known as Boonslick.

In January of 1833, the Missouri legislature declared a portion of Montgomery County to be a separate and distinct county to be known as Warren County. The county was named in honor of General Joseph Warren who fell at the battle of Bunker Hill. General Warren was a member of our country’s first three provincial congresses and was the president of the third.

2.1.6 Occupations The table below shows the distribution by percentage of major occupational categories for the incorporated cities and Warren County as a whole.

Table 2.6. Occupation Statistics, Warren County, Missouri

Communities Management, Service Sales and Natural Production, Business, Occupations Office Resources, Transportation, Science and Occupations Transportation, and Material Arts Construction, and Moving Maintenance Occupations Occupations Warren County 28% 17% 23% 15% 17% Innsbrook 56% 9% 22% 4% 9% Marthasville 25% 18% 28% 9% 20% Pendleton 0% 36% 18% 0% 45% Truesdale 11% 24% 22% 15% 28% Warrenton 28% 19% 26% 9% 17% Wright City 33% 18% 15% 17% 16% Source: U.S. Census, 2014 American Community Survey, 5-year Estimates

2.1.7 Agriculture According to the USDA’s 2012 Census of Agriculture, there are 612 farms in Warren County for a total of 136,128 acres. This compares to 99,200 farms in Missouri and 28,300,000 acres. The average size farm in Warren County is 219 acres while the state average is larger at 290 acres. The number of farms in Warren County in 2012 is down 14% from 2007. Eighty-eight percent of farms in Warren County are family-run. 2.8

The total value of farm products sold in Warren County in 2012 is $31,416,000. Crop sales account for 79% of the total sales and livestock account for the remaining 21% of sales. Beef cattle and hogs make up the majority of livestock sales and soybeans, grain corn, and forage crops account for the majority of crop sales. Average sales per Warren County farm is $50,590.

Farms in Warren County account for 528 farm proprietor of jobs (StatsAmerica 2014) plus approximately 45 additional agriculture-related workers (2010-2014 American Community Survey), or 3.4% of the labor force.

2.1.8 FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance Grants in Warren County From 1993 to date, Warren County has received well over $120,000 in FEMA Hazard Mitigation grants. The grant award for the earlier award is not available. These grants were used for repair and improvements to the low water bridges as listed in the table below.

Table 2.7. FEMA HMA Grants in Warren County from 1993 - 2016

Project Type Sub-applicant Award Date Project Total 402.1 Infrastructure Warren County 10/08/2008 $120,000 Protective Measures – Roads and Bridges (FEMA DR-1673- HMGP County Farm Road, Dry Fork Road # 1, Dry Fork Road # 2, Dry Fork Road # 3) 402.1 Infrastructure Warren County 12/29/2006 No award total is available Protective Measures – Roads and Bridges

Total > $120,000 Source: Warren County Emergency Management Agency

2.2 Jurisdictional Profiles and Mitigation Capabilities

This section will include individual profiles for each participating jurisdiction. These profiles were created with information provided by the MPC, including the Warren County Emergency Management Agency, participating school districts, and city clerks from each jurisdiction. The table will also include a discussion of previous mitigation initiatives in the planning area. There will be a summary table indicating specific capabilities of each jurisdiction that relate to their ability to implement mitigation opportunities. The unincorporated county is profiled first, followed by the incorporated communities, and the public school districts.

2.2.1 Unincorporated Warren County Warren County is a third-class county and its jurisdiction includes all unincorporated areas within its boundaries. The county is governed by a board of commissioners consisting of a Presiding Commissioner and two associate commissioners; a Southern District Commissioner and a Northern District Commissioner. The county’s organizational structure includes the following offices and departments. These county offices work in conjunction with various other non-county-government public safety agencies for the good of Warren County residents. 2.9

• Assessor • Planning and Zoning

• Auditor • Prosecuting Attorney

• Board of Commissioners • Public Administrator

• Circuit Clerk • Recorder of Deeds

• Collector • Sanitarian

• Coroner • Sheriff

• County Clerk • Surveyor

• Emergency Management Agency • Treasurer

• Health Department

Mitigation Initiatives / Capabilities Various Warren County agencies work together to mitigate public safety issues ranging from the benign to the serious. In addition, when conditions move beyond the mitigation stage, these agencies, in conjunction with Warren County Joint Dispatch, the Warren County Ambulance District, and local Fire Protection Districts, are prepared to respond in an immediate and appropriate manner to protect the community from whatever disaster befalls.

The Warren County Emergency Management Agency is responsible for work in the development, implementation and management of county-wide disaster prevention, preparedness, response, recovery and mitigation. It is responsible for the County’s all-hazard Comprehensive Emergency Plan, the County’s Hazard Mitigation Plan, and coordination of the activities for the County’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC). The EOC, when activated is a central location where representatives of local government and private sector agencies convene during disaster situations to make decisions, set priorities and coordinate resources for response and recovery.

The Warren County Health Department strives to protect and promote public health and safety through policy development and assurance.

The Planning and Zoning Commission regulates planning and zoning within the county including development of the Master Plan, flood plain management, and antenna tower structures regulation. The commission holds regular public meetings.

The County Sanitarian regulates the design, construction, and modification of on-site sewage treatment systems in order to protect and promote the public health, safety, economic well-being, and to prevent the spread of infectious, contagious, communicable, or dangerous diseases into Warren County.

The Sheriff’s Department works in partnership with the citizens of Warren County to preserve life, maintain human rights, protect property, and to prevent crime and the fear of crime to ensure that Warren County is a safe and secure environment in which to live, work, or visit.

The table below summarizes the capabilities of Warren County agencies. 2.10

Table 2.8. Unincorporated Warren County Mitigation Capabilities

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Planning Capabilities Comprehensive Plan Master Plan Builder's Plan N/A Capital Improvement Plan N/A Local Emergency Plan 05-04-10 Updated 5-10-15 County Emergency Plan 1-10-2012 Local Recovery Plan N/A County Recovery Plan N/A Local Mitigation Plan 2010 County Mitigation Plan N/A Local Mitigation Plan (PDM) N/A County Mitigation Plan (PDM) N/A EconomicDevelopment Plan N/A Transportation Plan N/A Land-use Plan Master Plan Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA)Plan N/A Watershed Plan N/A Firewise or other fire mitigation plan N/A School Mitigation Plan N/A Critical Facilities Plan (Mitigation / N/A Response / Recovery) Policies/Ordinance Status Including Date of Document or Policy Zoning Ordinance Warren County Zone Order Adopted 11/27/85, Revised 08/01/94 Amended as needed Building Code N/A Floodplain Ordinance Warren County Flood plain Management Ordinance Adopted 11/02/09 Subdivision Ordinance Appendix B-Sub-Regulations. Covered in Zone Order App B Adopted 3/17/14 Tree Trimming Ordinance N/A Nuisance Ordinance N/A Storm Water Ordinance N/A Drainage Ordinance N/A Site Plan Review Requirements Warren County Zone order - Various sections of codes, relative to use Historic Preservation Ordinance NA Landscape Ordinance NA Wetlands and Riparian Areas Conservation Plan NA Debris Management Plan Yes, approved October 29, 2013 Program Status Including Date of Document or Policy Zoning/Land Use Restrictions Master Plan Codes Building Site/Design N/A NFIP Participation Yes Hazard Awareness Program N/A National Weather Service (NWS) StormReady 2016 2.11

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Building Code Effectiveness Grading (BCEGs) N/A ISO Fire Rating N/A EconomicDevelopment Program N/A Land Use Program N/A Public Education/Awareness N/A Property Acquisition N/A Planning/Zoning Boards P&Z Commission Stream Maintenance Program N/A Tree Trimming Program Debris Management Plan Engineering Studies for Streams (Local / County / N/A Regional) Mutual Aid Agreements Yes Studies/Reports/Maps Status Including Date of Document or Policy Hazard Analysis/Risk Assessment (Local) THIRA 2016 Hazard Analysis/Risk Assessment (County) THIRA 2016 Flood Insurance Maps Effective 11/04/2009 FEMA Flood Insurance Study (Detailed) FIS Report Effective Nov 4, 2009 Evacuation Route Map N/A Critical Facilities Inventory Yes Vulnerable Population Inventory Yes Land Use Map Warren County Zoning Map Adopted 09/07/12 Amended 06/09/14 Staff/Department Yes/No Building Code Official No Building Inspector No Mapping Specialist (GIS) No Engineer No Development Planner No Public Works Official No Emergency Management Director Yes NFIP Floodplain Administrator Yes Bomb and/orArson Squad No Emergency Response Team No Hazardous Materials Expert No Local Emergency Planning Committee Yes County Emergency Management Commission Yes Sanitation Department No Transportation Department No EconomicDevelopment Department No Housing Department No Planning Consultant No Regional Planning Agencies No Historic Preservation No Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) Yes/No American Red Cross Yes, St. Louis Chapter

2.12

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Salvation Army Yes, St. Louis Chapter Veterans Groups Yes Environmental Organization No Homeowner Associations Yes Neighborhood Associations No Chamber of Commerce Yes Community Organizations (Lions, Kiwanis, etc.) Yes Local Funding Availability Yes/No Ability to apply for Community Development Block Yes Grants Ability to fund projects through Capital Improvements Yes funding Capabilities Yes/No Authority to levy taxes for a specific purpose Yes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric services Yes Impact fees for new development Yes Ability to incur debt through general obligation bonds Yes Ability to incur debt through special tax bonds Yes Ability to incur debt through private activities No Ability to withhold spending in hazard prone areas No Source:DataCollectionQuestionnaire, 2016

2.2.2 Village of Innsbrook The village of Innsbrook is situated in the eastern middle of the county. It has a total area of 9.6 sq. miles, of which, 9.0 sq. miles of it is land and 0.7 sq. miles of it is water.The village of Innsbrook is comprised almost entirely by Innsbrook Resort—a private, gated community. Innsbrook started as a get-away community ofseasonal living in 1971. From there, it evolved into a golf course, conference center,year round living, cultural center and more. The 2010 census data shows a population of 552, up 18% from the 2000 census. The Village of Innsbrook was incorporated in 1998 withthe intent to have a stronger voice in what developed in the vicinity and to preserve theexisting integrity and identity of the region.

Innsbrook is governed by a board of five elected trustees and their chairman. An administrator reports to the trustees on day-to-day matters.

Innsbrook is a relatively new community of affluent homes and weekend cottages. Electric power is provided to homes through an underground system which eliminates most high wind and storm hazards. However, most residences are constructed amidst thick timber and understory which make wild fires a more distinct possibility. The many lakes throughout the community make water safety an issue and dams constructed to create the lakes can also be a safety hazard.

Table 2.9. Village of Innsbrook Mitigation Capabilities

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Planning Capabilities Comprehensive Plan Adopted July 3, 2013; Resolution 2013-13 Builder's Plan N/A Capital Improvement Plan N/A 2.13

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Local Emergency Plan Adopted County Plan dated January 2012 County Emergency Plan Adopted, Dated January 2012 Local Recovery Plan N/A County Recovery Plan See Warren County Local Mitigation Plan Adopted County Plan County Mitigation Plan Adopted November 1, 2011; Resolution 2011-8 Local Mitigation Plan (PDM) N/A County Mitigation Plan (PDM) See Warren County Economic Development Plan N/A Transportation Plan Adopted, Dated January 18, 2014 Land-use Plan Within Zoning Regulations; Ordinance #187 dated Nov 12, 2013 Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Plan N/A Watershed Plan N/A Firewise or other fire mitigation plan See Wright City and Warrenton Fire District & Innsbrook Corporation Plan School Mitigation Plan N/A Critical Facilities Plan (Mitigation / N/A Response / Recovery) Policies/Ordinance Status Including Date of Document or Policy Zoning Ordinance Adopted November 12, 2013; Ordinance #187 Building Code N/A Floodplain Ordinance Adopted June 1, 2010; Ordinance #133 Subdivision Ordinance Within Zoning Regulations; Chapter 8 Tree Trimming Ordinance N/A Nuisance Ordinance Adopted March 13, 2012; Ordinance #158 Storm Water Ordinance N/A Drainage Ordinance N/A Site Plan Review Requirements Within Zoning Regulations Historic Preservation Ordinance N/A Landscape Ordinance Within Zoning Regulations Wetlands and Riparian AreasConservationPlan N/A Debris Management Plan Adopted September 10, 2013; Resolution 2013-4 Program Status Including Date of Document or Policy Zoning/Land Use Restrictions Within Zoning Regulations Codes Building Site/Design See Fire Districts; Adopted IRC2009 NFIP Participation Yes Hazard Awareness Program N/A National Weather Service (NWS) StormReady Warren County CODE Red Building Code Effectiveness Grading (BCEGs) N/A ISO Fire Rating Wright City and Warrenton Fire Districts EconomicDevelopment Program N/A Land Use Program Within Zoning Regulations Public Education/Awareness N/A Property Acquisition N/A 2.14

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Planning/Zoning Boards Adopted July 23, 1998; Ordinance #8 Stream Maintenance Program N/A Tree Trimming Program N/A Engineering Studies for Streams N/A (Local/County/Regional) Mutual Aid Agreements N/A Studies/Reports/Maps Status Including Date of Document or Policy Hazard Analysis/Risk Assessment (Local) N/A Hazard Analysis/Risk Assessment (County) See Warren County Flood Insurance Maps Dated December 2009 FEMA Flood Insurance Study (Detailed) N/A Evacuation Route Map N/A Critical Facilities Inventory N/A Vulnerable Population Inventory N/A Land Use Map See Zoning Regulations; Chapter 10 Staff/Department Yes/No Building Code Official No Building Inspector No Mapping Specialist (GIS) Yes, Subcontractor Engineer Yes, On Planning and Zoning Commission Development Planner No Public Works Official No Emergency Management Director No NFIP Floodplain Administrator No Bomb and/orArson Squad Warren County Sheriff's Department Emergency Response Team Warren County Sheriff's Department Hazardous Materials Expert No Local Emergency Planning Committee No County Emergency Management Commission Yes, Warren County Sanitation Department DHSS & DNR Transportation Department No Economic Development Department No Housing Department No Planning Consultant Yes, Subcontractor Regional Planning Agencies Boonslick Regional Planning Commission (BRPC) Historic Preservation Innsbrook Historical Society Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) Yes/No American Red Cross No Salvation Army No Veterans Groups No Environmental Organization No Homeowner Associations Innsbrook Property Owners Association Neighborhood Associations Oakwood Neighborhood Association

2.15

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Chamber of Commerce No Community Organizations (Lions, Kiwanis, etc.) No Local Funding Availability Yes/No Ability to apply for Community Development Block No Grants Ability to fund projects through Capital Improvements No funding Capabilities Yes/No Authority to levy taxes for a specific purpose Yes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric services No Impact fees for new development No Ability to incur debt through general obligation bonds Yes Ability to incur debt through special tax bonds Yes Ability to incur debt through private activities No Ability to withhold spending in hazard prone areas No Source: Data Collection Questionnaire, 2016

2.2.3 City of Marthasville Marthasville is located in the south central part of the county near the site of the early 1763 French fur trading post named La Charrette. Missouri state highway 47 passes through the city as once did the Missouri, Kansas and Eastern Railroad which was completed in the winter of 1892 and taken over by the Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railroad in July of 1893. The old roadbed is now part of the Katy Trail state park. The region was widely settled by German immigrants during the 1800’s who brought their wine making skills with them and were attracted to this Missouri River Valley which has become known as the Missouri Rhineland.

Today, the city of Marthasville has a population of 1,136 which is a 36% increase from the 2000 census. Marthasville is governed by a Mayor and a four-member City Council elected for 2-year terms. Day-to-day business is handled by a city administrator.Marthasville occupied 550 acres, all land.

Marthasville is an older community with homes and businesses ranging from new to over 100 years old which can present challenges for the Marthasville Fire Protection District. In addition, much of Marthasville sits in the Missouri River floodplain. Marthasville has its own ambulance district as well.

The table below summarizes Marthasville’s hazard mitigation capabilities.

Table 2.10. City of Marthasville Mitigation Capabilities

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Planning Capabilities Comprehensive Plan 7/16/2014 Builder's Plan N/A Capital Improvement Plan Ordinance #305 for Capital Improvement Tax 1/9/2007 Local Emergency Plan Adopted County Plan, Ordinance #348 11/16/2011 County Emergency Plan 1-10-12 Local Recovery Plan N/A County Recovery Plan N/A Local Mitigation Plan Adopted County Plan, Ordinance #348 11/16/2011 2.16

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy County Mitigation Plan N/A Local Mitigation Plan (PDM) Adopted County Plan, Ordinance #348 11/16/2011 County Mitigation Plan (PDM) N/A Economic Development Plan N/A Transportation Plan N/A Land-use Plan N/A Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA)Plan Ordinance #334 10/13/2009 Watershed Plan 1/27/2010 Firewise or other fire mitigation plan N/A School Mitigation Plan N/A Critical Facilities Plan (Mitigation / N/A Response / Recovery) Policies/Ordinance Status Including Date of Document or Policy Zoning Ordinance N/A Building Code N/A Floodplain Ordinance Ordinance #334 10/13/2009 Subdivision Ordinance N/A Tree Trimming Ordinance N/A Nuisance Ordinance Ordinance #331 8/11/2009 Storm Water Ordinance N/A Drainage Ordinance N/A Site Plan Review Requirements N/A Historic Preservation Ordinance N/A Landscape Ordinance N/A Wetlands and Riparian AreasConservationPlan N/A Debris Management Plan N/A Program Status Including Date of Document or Policy Zoning/Land Use Restrictions N/A Codes Building Site/Design N/A NFIP Participation Yes Hazard Awareness Program N/A National Weather Service (NWS) StormReady N/A Building Code Effectiveness Grading (BCEGs) N/A ISO Fire Rating N/A EconomicDevelopment Program N/A Land Use Program N/A Public Education/Awareness N/A Property Acquisition N/A Planning/Zoning Boards N/A Stream Maintenance Program N/A Tree Trimming Program N/A Engineering Studies for Streams (Local / County / N/A Regional) Mutual Aid Agreements N/A Studies/Reports/Maps Status Including Date of Document or Policy 2.17

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Hazard Analysis/Risk Assessment (Local) N/A Hazard Analysis/Risk Assessment (County) N/A Flood Insurance Maps Yes FEMA Flood Insurance Study (Detailed) Yes Evacuation Route Map N/A Critical Facilities Inventory N/A Vulnerable Population Inventory N/A Land Use Map N/A Staff/Department Yes/No Building Code Official No Building Inspector No Mapping Specialist (GIS) No Engineer No Development Planner No Public Works Official Yes Emergency Management Director Yes NFIP Floodplain Administrator Yes Bomb and/orArson Squad No Emergency Response Team No Hazardous Materials Expert No Local Emergency Planning Committee No County Emergency Management Commission Warren County Sanitation Department No Transportation Department No Economic Development Department No Housing Department No Planning Consultant No Regional Planning Agencies No Historic Preservation No Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) Yes/No American Red Cross No Salvation Army No VeteransGroups No Environmental Organization No Homeowner Associations No Neighborhood Associations No Chamber of Commerce Yes Community Organizations (Lions, Kiwanis, etc.) No Local Funding Availability Yes/No Ability to apply for Community Development Block Yes Grants Ability to fund projects through Capital Improvements Yes funding Capabilities Yes/No

2.18

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Authority to levy taxes for a specific purpose Yes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric services Yes Impact fees for new development No Ability to incur debt through general obligation bonds Yes Ability to incur debt through special tax bonds Yes Ability to incur debt through private activities No Ability to withhold spending in hazard prone areas No Source: Data Collection Questionnaire, 2016

2.2.4 Village of Pendleton The City of Pendleton is governed by three elected trustees and an elected chairman. A clerk staffs the city hall on a part-time, day-to-day basis. According to the 2010 census, the village has a total area of 0.09 square miles, all of it land, and a population of 43. There is no growth forecast in the 2010- 2014 American Community Survey Estimates. The following hazard mitigation initiatives are carried out by the city.

Structures in Pendleton are sound but of older construction and present no unusual challenges for fire fighters. The table below summarizes the hazard mitigation capabilities of Pendleton.

Table 2.11. Village of Pendleton Mitigation Activities

Capability Status Including Date of Document or Policy Planning Capabilities Comprehensive Plan No Builder's Plan No Capital Improvement Plan No Local Emergency Plan No County Emergency Plan 1-10-2012 Local Recovery Plan No County Recovery Plan No Local Mitigation Plan Adopted County Plan County Mitigation Plan No Local Mitigation Plan (PDM) N/A County Mitigation Plan (PDM) N/A Economic Development Plan No Transportation Plan No Land-use Plan No FloodMitigationAssistance(FMA)Plan No WatershedPlan No Firewise or other fire mitigation plan No School Mitigation Plan No Critical Facilities Plan No (Mitigation/Response/Recovery) Policies/Ordinance Status Including Date of Document or Policy Zoning Ordinance Yes Building Code Yes Floodplain Ordinance No Subdivision Ordinance No Tree Trimming Ordinance No Nuisance Ordinance No Storm Water Ordinance No Drainage Ordinance No Capability Status Including Date of Document or Policy Site Plan Review Requirements No 2.19

Capability Status Including Date of Document or Policy Historic Preservation Ordinance No Landscape Ordinance No Iowa Wetlands and Riparian Areas Conservation Plan No Debris Management Plan No Program Status Including Date of Document or Policy Zoning/Land Use Restrictions Yes Codes Building Site/Design Yes NFIP Participation No Hazard AwarenessProgram No National Weather Service (NWS) Storm Ready No Building Code Effectiveness Grading (BCEGs) No ISO Fire Rating No Economic Development Program No Land Use Program No Public Education/Awareness No Property Acquisition No Planning/Zoning Boards No Stream Maintenance Program No TreeTrimmingProgram No Engineering Studies for Streams No (Local/County/Regional) Mutual Aid Agreements No Studies/Reports/Maps Status Including Date of Document or Policy Hazard Analysis/ Risk Assessment (Local) No Hazard Analysis/Risk Assessment (County) No Flood Insurance Maps Yes FEMA Flood Insurance Study (Detailed) No Evacuation Route Map No Critical Facilities Inventory No Vulnerable Population Inventory No Land Use Map No Staff/Department Status Including Date of Document or Policy Building Code Official No Building Inspector No Mapping Specialist (GIS) No Engineer No Development Planner No Public Works Official No Emergency Management Coordinator No NFIP Floodplain Administrator No Bomb and/or Arson Squad No Emergency Response Team No Hazardous Materials Expert No Local Emergency Planning Committee No County Emergency Management Commission No Sanitation Department No Transportation Department No Economic Development Department No Housing Department No Planning Consultant No Regional Planning Agencies Boonslick RPC Historic Preservation No Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) Status Including Date of Document or Policy American Red Cross No Salvation Army No Capability Status Including Date of Document or Policy Veterans Groups No Environmental Organization No Homeowner Associations No Neighborhood Associations Yes 2.20

Capability Status Including Date of Document or Policy Chamber of Commerce No Community Organizations (Lions, Kiwanis, etc.) No Local Funding Availability Status Including Date of Document or Policy Ability to apply for Community Development Block Yes Grants Ability to fund projects through Capital Improvements Yes funding Authority to levy taxes for a specific purpose Yes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric services Yes Impact fees for new development No Ability to incur debt through general obligation bonds Yes Ability to incur debt through special tax bonds Yes Ability to incur debt through private activities No Ability to withhold spending in hazard prone areas No Source: Data Collection Questionnaire, 2016

2.2.5 City of Truesdale Truesdale was founded on land purchased in 1856 by William Truesdail. Truesdail worked for the North Missouri railroad and donated the land for a whistle-stop on condition the town be named for him. Over the years the spelling of Truesdail evolved into Truesdale. The City of Truesdale is a fourth-class city and is governed by an elected 4-member city council and an elected Mayor. A clerk staffs the city hall on a day-to-day basis. According to the 2010 census, the city has a population of 732, up 84% since the 2000 census. The city occupies an area of 1.29 square miles, all of it land. The following hazard mitigation initiatives are carried out by the city.

Structures in Truesdale are sound but of older construction and present no unusual challenges for fire fighters. Of the 732 residents of Truesdale, 5% speak a language other than English. The table below summarizes the hazard mitigation capabilities of Truesdale.

Table 2.12. City of Truesdale Mitigation Activities

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Planning Capabilities Comprehensive Plan No Builder's Plan No Capital Improvement Plan No Local Emergency Plan Yes County Emergency Plan 1-10-2012 Local Recovery Plan No County Recovery Plan N/A Local Mitigation Plan Adopted County Plan County Mitigation Plan N/A Local Mitigation Plan (PDM) N/A County Mitigation Plan (PDM) N/A Economic Development Plan No Transportation Plan No Land-use Plan No Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Plan No Watershed Plan No

2.21

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Firewise or other fire mitigation plan No School Mitigation Plan No Critical Facilities Plan No (Mitigation/Response/Recovery) Policies/Ordinance Status Including Date of Document or Policy Zoning Ordinance No Building Code Yes-last updated 3/26/2014, ordinance #708 Floodplain Ordinance Yes Subdivision Ordinance Yes 5-18-05 ordinance #433 Tree Trimming Ordinance No Nuisance Ordinance Yes-ordinance #97codefying ordinance 2/31/86 Storm Water Ordinance Yes-part of subdivision 5-18-05, ordinance #433

Drainage Ordinance No Site Plan Review Requirements Yes-ordinance #433, 5-18-05 Historic Preservation Ordinance No Landscape Ordinance Yes ordinance #433 5-18-05 Wetlands and Riparian Areas Conservation Plan No Debris Management Plan No Program Status Including Date of Document or Policy Zoning/Land Use Restrictions No Codes Building Site/Design Yes updated 3/26/2014 NFIP Participation No Hazard Awareness Program No National Weather Service (NWS) Storm Ready No Building Code Effectiveness Grading (BCEGs) No ISO Fire Rating Yes Economic Development Program No Land Use Program No Public Education/Awareness No Property Acquisition No Planning/Zoning Boards No Stream Maintenance Program No Tree Trimming Program No Engineering Studies for Streams No (Local/County/Regional) Mutual Aid Agreements Police Department & City of Warrenton Water Studies/Reports/Maps Status Including Date of Document or Policy Hazard Analysis/Risk Assessment (Local) No Hazard Analysis/Risk Assessment (County) N/A Flood Insurance Maps Yes FEMA Flood Insurance Study (Detailed) No Evacuation Route Map No Critical Facilities Inventory No Vulnerable Population Inventory No

2.22

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Land Use Map No Staff/Department Yes/No Building Code Official Yes Building Inspector Yes Mapping Specialist (GIS) No Engineer Yes-Contracted out Development Planner No Public Works Official Yes Emergency Management Director No NFIP Floodplain Administrator Yes Bomb and/or Arson Squad No Emergency Response Team No Hazardous Materials Expert No Local Emergency Planning Committee No County Emergency Management Commission No Sanitation Department Yes Transportation Department Under Public Works Economic Development Department No Housing Department No Planning Consultant No

Regional Planning Agencies Yes-Boonslick Regional Planning Commission Historic Preservation No Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) Yes/No American Red Cross No Salvation Army No Veterans Groups No Environmental Organization No Homeowner Associations No Neighborhood Associations One subdivision has Chamber of Commerce Yes-Warrenton Area Chamber of Commerce Community Organizations (Lions, Kiwanis, etc.) Knights of Columbus Local Funding Availability Yes/No Ability to apply for Community Development Block Yes Grants Ability to fund projects through Capital Improvements Yes funding

2.23

Capabilities Yes/No Authority to levy taxes for a specific purpose Yes-with voter approval Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric services Yes Impact fees for new development No Ability to incur debt through general obligation bonds Yes Ability to incur debt through special tax bonds Yes Ability to incur debt through private activities No Ability to withhold spending in hazard prone areas No Source: Data Collection Questionnaire, 2016

2.2.6 City of Warrenton The City of Warrenton was founded in 1864. It is the county seat of Warren County and along with the adjacent city of Truesdale is home to the Warren County R-III School District. Warrenton is located in the north central portion of Warren County and lies on the Norfolk Southern railway and Interstate 70.These routes bisect the city and can present difficulty in transporting emergency apparatus from one end of town to the other when overpasses are not in service. Warrenton’s population in the 2010 census was 7,880, a 49% increase from 2000.The city has a total area of 8.46 square miles of which 8.37 square miles is land and 0.09 square miles is water.

Warrenton is governed by an elected mayor and a 6-member board of aldermen. The city administration is assisted by a full time Clerk, an Economic Development director, and a director of Operations and Finance.

Structures in Warrenton range from new roughly 100 years old but most are well-maintained and present no adverse issues for first responders. Of the 7,880 residents of Warrenton, 5.7% speak a language other than English.

The table below summarizes the mitigation capabilities of Warrenton.

Table 2.13. City of Warrenton Mitigation Capabilities

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Planning Capabilities Comprehensive Plan In progress – estimated completion Summer 2016 Builder's Plan N/A Capital Improvement Plan N/A Local Emergency Plan In place – 10 years old. New plan in progress County Emergency Plan 1-10-2012 Local Recovery Plan N/A County Recovery Plan N/A Local Mitigation Plan Adopted County Plan County Mitigation Plan N/A Local Mitigation Plan (PDM) N/A County Mitigation Plan (PDM) N/A EconomicDevelopment Plan N/A Transportation Plan N/A Land-use Plan Yes – part of Comprehensive plan Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA)Plan N/A 2.24

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Watershed Plan Yes – Public Works Firewise or other fire mitigation plan N/A School Mitigation Plan Yes - 2013 Critical Facilities Plan N/A (Mitigation/Response/Recovery) Policies/Ordinance Status Including Date of Document or Policy Zoning Ordinance Yes Building Code Yes Floodplain Ordinance Yes Subdivision Ordinance Yes Tree Trimming Ordinance N/A Nuisance Ordinance Yes StormWaterOrdinance Yes Drainage Ordinance N/A SitePlanReview Requirements Yes Historic Preservation Ordinance N/A Landscape Ordinance Yes – part of Zoning ordinance Wetlands and Riparian Areas Conservation Plan N/A Debris Management Plan Per Warren County Emergency Management Agency Program Status Including Date of Document or Policy Zoning/Land Use Restrictions Yes Codes Building Site/Design Yes NFIP Participation Yes Hazard Awareness Program N/A National Weather Service (NWS) Storm Ready Per WCEMA Building Code Effectiveness Grading (BCEGs) N/A ISO Fire Rating Yes Economic Development Program Yes Land Use Program Yes Public Education/Awareness Yes Property Acquisition N/A Planning/Zoning Boards Yes Stream Maintenance Program N/A Tree Trimming Program N/A Engineering Studies for Streams N/A (Local/County/Regional) Mutual Aid Agreements Yes Studies/Reports/Maps Status Including Date of Document or Policy Hazard Analysis/Risk Assessment (Local) N/A Hazard Analysis/Risk Assessment (County) Yes Flood Insurance Maps Yes FEMA Flood Insurance Study (Detailed) N/A Evacuation Route Map N/A Critical Facilities Inventory Per WCEMA Vulnerable Population Inventory Per WCEMA 2.25

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Land Use Map Yes Staff/Department Yes/No Building Code Official Yes Building Inspector Yes Mapping Specialist (GIS) No Engineer No Development Planner Yes Public Works Official Yes Emergency Management Director Yes NFIP Floodplain Administrator No Bomb and/or Arson Squad No Emergency Response Team No Hazardous Materials Expert No Local Emergency Planning Committee Yes County Emergency Management Commission No Sanitation Department No Transportation Department No Economic Development Department Yes Housing Department No Planning Consultant Yes Regional Planning Agencies Yes Historic Preservation Yes Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) Yes/No American Red Cross Yes Salvation Army Yes Veterans Groups Yes Environmental Organization Yes Homeowner Associations Yes Neighborhood Associations Yes Chamber of Commerce Yes Community Organizations (Lions, Kiwanis, etc. Yes Local Funding Availability Yes/No Ability to apply for Community Development Block Yes Grants Ability to fund projects through Capital Improvements Yes funding Capabilities Yes/No Authority to levy taxes for a specific purpose No

Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric services Yes Impact fees for new development No

Ability to incur debt through general obligation bonds Yes Ability to incur debt through special tax bonds No

2.26

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Ability to incur debt through private activities No

Ability to withhold spending in hazard prone areas Yes Source: Data Collection Questionnaire, 2016

2.2.7 City of Wright City The City of Wright City was platted as a village in 1857 by Doctor Henry C. Wright on land granted to Dr. Wright in 1831 by the United States. The village was platted to take advantage of the new North Missouri Railroad which was constructed in 1857. In September, 1863 the Wright City Raid took place during the Civil War. The town of Wright City was incorporated in 1869 and became a fourth class city in 1941.

Wright City is in the east central area of Warren County and lies on Interstate 70 and the Norfolk Southern Railroad. Both routes bisect the cityand present ease of access while at the same time occasionally presenting difficulty in transporting emergency apparatus from one end of town to the other when an overpass is out of service. Wright City’s population in the 2010 census was 3,119 which is 104% greater than it was in 2000. The city has a total area of 6.06 square miles of which 5.97 square miles is land and 0.09 square miles is water.

Wright City is governed by an elected mayor and 4-member board of aldermen. A city clerk handles day-to-day matters with the residents. Wright City is home to the Wright City R-II School District. The city’s specific mitigation initiatives are listed below.

Structures in Wright City range from new to roughly 100 years old. Most are well-maintained and present no adverse issues for fire fighters. Of the 3,119 residents in Wright City, 2.9% speak a language other than English. The table below summarizes Wright City’s hazard mitigation capabilities.

Table 2.14. City of Wright City Mitigation Capabilities

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Planning Capabilities Comprehensive Plan 2004-In process of updating Builder's Plan N/A Capital Improvement Plan Sewer working on it. Water 2011 Local Emergency Plan N/A County Emergency Plan 1-10-12 Local Recovery Plan N/A County Recovery Plan N/A Local Mitigation Plan Adopted County Plan County Mitigation Plan N/A Local Mitigation Plan (PDM) N/A County Mitigation Plan (PDM) N/A EconomicDevelopment Plan N/A Transportation Plan N/A Land-use Plan 2004 In Comprehensive Plan Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA)Plan N/A Watershed Plan N/A Firewise or other fire mitigation plan N/A 2.27

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy School Mitigation Plan N/A Critical Facilities Plan N/A (Mitigation/Response/Recovery) Policies/Ordinance Status Including Date of Document or Policy Zoning Ordinance Continuous update Building Code IBC 2009 Adopted 2-9-12 Floodplain Ordinance Approved updated 2009 Subdivision Ordinance Approved-Updated 3-22-2012 Tree Trimming Ordinance None Nuisance Ordinance Adopted Updated 5-24-2012 StormWaterOrdinance Included in Subdivision ordinance Drainage Ordinance Included in Subdivision ordinance SitePlanReview Requirements Included in Subdivision ordinance Historic Preservation Ordinance In Zoning Subdivision ordinance Landscape Ordinance In Subdivision ordinance Wetlands and Riparian Areas Conservation Plan N/A Debris Management Plan N/A Program Status Including Date of Document or Policy Zoning/Land Use Restrictions Adopted by ordinance Zoning Codes Building Site/Design N/A NFIP Participation Yes Hazard Awareness Program N/A National Weather Service (NWS) Storm Ready N/A Building Code Effectiveness Grading (BCEGs) N/A ISO Fire Rating N/A Economic Development Program Yes Land Use Program In Comprehensive Plan Public Education/Awareness N/A Property Acquisition N/A Planning/Zoning Boards Yes since 1974 Stream Maintenance Program No Tree Trimming Program No Engineering Studies for Streams No (Local/County/Regional) Mutual Aid Agreements Yes Studies/Reports/Maps Status Including Date of Document or Policy Hazard Analysis/Risk Assessment (Local) N/A Hazard Analysis/Risk Assessment (County) N/A Flood Insurance Maps N/A FEMA Flood Insurance Study (Detailed) N/A Evacuation Route Map N/A Critical Facilities Inventory N/A Vulnerable Population Inventory N/A Land Use Map Yes in Comprehensive Plan Staff/Department Yes/No 2.28

Capabilities Status Including Date of Document or Policy Building Code Official Yes Building Inspector Yes Mapping Specialist (GIS) No Engineer No Development Planner No Public Works Official Yes Emergency Management Director No NFIP Floodplain Administrator Yes Bomb and/or Arson Squad No Emergency Response Team No Hazardous Materials Expert Fire Dept Local Emergency Planning Committee No County Emergency Management Commission Yes Sanitation Department No Transportation Department Yes Economic Development Department Yes Housing Department No Planning Consultant No Regional Planning Agencies Yes Historic Preservation No Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) Yes/No American Red Cross No Salvation Army No Veterans Groups No Environmental Organization No Homeowner Associations Yes Neighborhood Associations Yes Chamber of Commerce Yes Community Organizations (Lions, Kiwanis, etc.) Yes Local Funding Availability Yes/No Ability to apply for Community Development Block Yes Grants Ability to fund projects through Capital Improvements Yes funding Capabilities Yes/No Authority to levy taxes for a specific purpose Yes Fees for water, sewer, gas, or electric services Yes Impact fees for new development Yes Ability to incur debt through general obligation bonds Yes Ability to incur debt through special tax bonds Yes Ability to incur debt through private activities Yes Ability to withhold spending in hazard prone areas No Source: Data Collection Questionnaire, 2016

2.29

The table below summarizes the hazard mitigation capabilities of each city in Warren County and the unincorporated area of the county. When relevant, the date of the most recent version is provided.

Table 2.15. Mitigation Capabilities Summary Table

CAPABILITIES Unincorporated Innsbrook Marthasville Pendleton Truesdale Warrenton Wright Warren County City Comprehensive Plan Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A In progress Yes Builder's Plan N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Capital Improvement Plan N/A N/A Yes N/A N/A N/A Yes Local Emergency Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes County Emergency Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Local Recovery Plan N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A County Recovery Plan N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Local Mitigation Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes County Mitigation Plan N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Local Mitigation Plan (PDM) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A County Mitigation Plan N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (PDM) Economic Development N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Plan Transportation Plan N/A Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Land-use Plan Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Flood Mitigation Assistance N/A N/A Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A (FMA) Plan Watershed Plan N/A N/A Yes N/A N/A Yes N/A Firewise or other fire N/A Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A mitigation plan School Mitigation Plan N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes N/A Critical Facilities Plan N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Policies/Ordinance Zoning Ordinance Yes Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes Yes Building Code N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Floodplain Ordinance Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Subdivision Ordinance Yes Yes N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes Tree Trimming Ordinance N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Nuisance Ordinance N/A Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Storm Water Ordinance N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes Drainage Ordinance N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Site Plan Review Yes Yes N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes Requirements Historic Preservation N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Ordinance Landscape Ordinance N/A Yes N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes Wetlands and Riparian N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Areas Conservation Plan Debris Management Plan Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A Yes N/A Program Zoning/Land Use Yes Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes Yes Restrictions Codes Building Site/Design N/A Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A 2.30

CAPABILITIES Unincorporated Innsbrook Marthasville Pendleton Truesdale Warrenton Wright Warren County City NFIP Participation Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes

NFIP Community Rating N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A System (CRS) Participating Community Hazard Awareness Program N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A National Weather Service Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A Yes N/A (NWS) Storm Ready Building Code Effectiveness N/A N/a N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Grading (BCEGs) ISO Fire Rating N/A Yes N/A N/A Yes Yes N/A Economic Development N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes N/A Program Land Use Program N/A Yes N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Public N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes N/A Education/Awareness Property Acquisition N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Planning/Zoning Boards Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Stream Maintenance N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Program Tree Trimming Program Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Engineering Studies for N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Streams Mutual Aid Agreements Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Studies/Reports/Maps Hazard Analysis/Risk Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Assessment (Local) Hazard Analysis/Risk N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes N/A Assessment (County) Flood Insurance Maps Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A FEMA Flood Insurance Yes N/A Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A Study (Detailed) Evacuation Route Map N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Critical Facilities Inventory Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes N/A Vulnerable Population Yes N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes N/A Inventory Land Use Map Yes Yes N/A N/A N/A Yes Yes Staff/Department Building Code Official No No No No Yes Yes Yes Building Inspector No No No No Yes No Yes Mapping Specialist (GIS) No Yes No No No No No Engineer No Yes No No Yes No No Development Planner No No No No No Yes No Public Works Official Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Emergency Management Yes No Yes No No Yes No Coordinator NFIP Floodplain Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Administrator Bomb and/or Arson Squad No Yes No No No No No Emergency Response Team No Yes No No No No No Hazardous Materials Expert No No No No No No Yes Local Emergency Planning Yes No No No No Yes No Committee 2.31

CAPABILITIES Unincorporated Innsbrook Marthasville Pendleton Truesdale Warrenton Wright Warren County City County Emergency Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Management Commission Sanitation Department No Yes No No No No No Transportation Department No No No No Yes No Yes Economic Development No No No No No Yes Yes Department Housing Department No No No No No No No Planning Consultant No Yes No No No Yes No Regional Planning Agencies Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Historic Preservation No Yes No No No Yes No Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) American Red Cross Yes No No No No Yes No Salvation Army Yes No No No No Yes No Veterans Groups Yes No No No No Yes No Environmental Organization No No No No No Yes Yes Homeowner Associations Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Neighborhood Associations No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Chamber of Commerce Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Community Organizations Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes (Lions, Kiwanis, etc. Financial Resources Apply for Community Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Development Block Grants Fund projects through Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Capital Improvements funding Authority to levy taxes for Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes specific purposes Fees for water, sewer, gas, Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes or electric services Impact fees for new Yes No No No No No Yes development Incur dept through general Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes obligation bonds Incur debt through special Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes tax bonds Incur debt through private No No No No No No Yes activities Withhold spending in No No No No No Yes No hazard prone areas Source: Data Collection Questionnaires, 2016

2.2.8 Public School District Profiles and Mitigation Capabilities There are two school districts located in Warren County; Warren County R-III School District and the Wright City R-II School District. A small number of Warren County students are served by the Gasconade County R-I School District and the Washington School District. The Washington District operates a school building in Marthasville. There are no Gasconade R-I District buildings in Warren County. The figure below provides the boundaries of the school districts participating in this plan.

2.32

Figure 2.6. Boundaries of School Districts Serving Warren County

Source: Boonslick Regional Planning Commission

The Warren County R-III District operates three campuses in the City of Warrenton with a total of 5 attendance centers. The student body numbers 3,256. The district also operates an Alpha Academy which is located off campus. Students rotate in and out of the Academy during the night. The district employs 282 certificated staff. The district participates in the Warren County Hazard Mitigation Planning effort.

The Wright City R-II District is located in Wright City and it also participates in Hazard Mitigation Planning with the County. The district operates four attendance centers, including a Pre-School, in the county with a total student population of 1,581. All attendance centers are inside the city, with the 2.33 exception of the East Elementary School located north of Interstate 70 near the St. Charles County line. The district employs 145 certificated staff.

The School District of Washington serves the City of Washington in Franklin County, plus the Marthasville Elementary attendance center in Marthasville which serves Kindergarten through 6th grade. The district has a total enrollment of 4,185; however the enrollment at the Marthasville school is just 214, or 5.1% of the total student body. The district employs 462 certificated staff of which 37 are assigned to the Marthasville attendance center.Operationally, the Marthasville attendance center is separated from the district which is located across the Missouri River in Washington making transportation during flooding an issue. The district participates in the Warren County Hazard Mitigation Planning effort.

The Gasconade R-I District serves the City of Herman in Gasconade County and a small portion of students in the south west corner of Warren County. The number of students transported from Warren County to the district in Herman is not available at this time. Like Marthasville, transportation of students to and from their attendance centers can be a problem during flooding. The district participates in the Warren County Hazard Mitigation Planning process.

Table 2.16. School District Buildings and Enrollment Data, February 2016

District Name Building Name Building Enrolment Warren County R-III Warrenton High 956 Black Hawk Middle 745 Daniel Boone Elementary 447 Rebecca Boone Elementary 488 Warrior Ridge Elementary 537 Wright City R-II Wright City High 454 Wright City Middle 333 Wright City West Elementary 504 Wright City East Elementary 240 Wright Start Pre-School 62 Washington Marthasville Elementary 214 Gasconade No attendance centers in Warren County Source: http://mcds.dese.mo.gov/quickfacts/Pages/District-and-School-Information.aspx

2.34

Table 2.17. Summary of Mitigation Capabilities – School Districts Serving Warren County

Capability Warren County Wright City R-II Gasconade School District R-III County R-I of Washington City Planning Elements Master Plan Yes, 07/2015 Yes/Updated Yes, 6/30/2015 Yes/Updated annually annually Capital Improvement Yes, 08/2015 Yes/Updated annually Yes, 0/23/2015 Yes/Updated Plan annually School Emergency Plan Yes, 08/2015 Yes/Updated annually Yes, 6/30/2015 Yes/Updated annually

Weapons Policy Yes 08/2014 Yes Yes- Last reviewed Yes 2/8/2001 PersonnelResources Full-Time Building Yes Yes Yes Yes Official (Principal) Emergency Manager Yes Yes Yes Yes Grant Writer N/A N/A N/A No Public Information Officer Yes Yes N/A Yes FinancialResources Capital Improvements Yes No Response Yes Yes Project Funding Local Funds Yes No Response Yes Yes General Obligation No No Response Yes Yes Bonds Special Tax Bonds No No Response Yes No Private Activities / N/A No Response Yes No Donations State And Federal Yes No Response Yes Yes Funds/Grants Other Public Education Yes Yes Yes Yes Programs Privately Or Self- Yes Yes No Private Insured? Fire Evacuation Training Yes Yes Yes Yes Tornado Sheltering Yes Yes Yes Yes Exercises Public Address / Yes Yes Yes Yes Emergency Alert System NOAA Weather Radios Yes Yes Yes Yes Lock-Down Yes Yes Yes Yes SecurityTraining Mitigation Programs Yes Yes Yes Yes Tornado Shelter/ No Yes No Yes for shelters, no Safe room safe rooms

CampusPolice Yes Yes No Yes Data Collection Questionnaires, 2016

2.35

This Page Intentionally Blank

2.36