DOCSLIB.ORG

Freedom of Religion Or Belief & Blasphemy Prisoners Database

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Freedom of Religion Or Belief & Blasphemy Prisoners Database Freedom of Religion or Belief & Blasphemy Prisoners Database World Report 2016 Human Rights Without Frontiers International Human Rights Without Frontiers Avenue d’Auderghem, 1040 Brussels Phone/Fax: 32 2 3456145 Email: [email protected] – Website: http://www.hrwf.eu 2016 PRISONERS DATABASE Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 ALGERIA ................................................................................................................................ 16 AZERBAIJAN ......................................................................................................................... 18 CHINA ..................................................................................................................................... 27 EGYPT ..................................................................................................................................... 84 ERITREA ................................................................................................................................. 90 INDIA ...................................................................................................................................... 96 INDONESIA .......................................................................................................................... 101 IRAN ...................................................................................................................................... 106 KAZAKHSTAN .................................................................................................................... 150 KYRGYZSTAN .................................................................................................................... 162 MOLDOVA ........................................................................................................................... 163 NEPAL ................................................................................................................................... 164 NORTH KOREA ................................................................................................................... 171 PAKISTAN ............................................................................................................................ 173 RUSSIA ................................................................................................................................. 191 SAUDI ARABIA ................................................................................................................... 196 SINGAPORE ......................................................................................................................... 199 SOUTH KOREA ................................................................................................................... 201 SUDAN .................................................................................................................................. 217 TAJIKISTAN ......................................................................................................................... 221 TURKMENISTAN ................................................................................................................ 230 UZBEKISTAN ...................................................................................................................... 233 VIETNAM ............................................................................................................................. 250 YEMEN ................................................................................................................................. 254 INTRODUCTION Freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) is a universal human right guaranteed by Article 18 of the UN Universal Declaration on Human Rights (Universal Declaration) and the UN International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) which reads: (1): Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom [...] either individually or in community with others and in public or private to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching. (2): No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice. (3): Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.’ According to the 1981 UN Declaration of the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, Article 6, the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion, or belief includes, inter alia, the following freedoms: (a) To worship or assemble in connection with a religion or belief, and to establish and maintain places for these purposes; (b) To establish and maintain appropriate charitable or humanitarian institutions; (c) To make, acquire and use to an adequate extent the necessary articles and materials related to the rites or customs of a religion or belief; (d) To write, issue and disseminate relevant publications in these areas; (e) To teach a religion or belief in places suitable for these purposes; (f) To solicit and receive voluntary financial and other contributions from individuals and institutions; (g) To train, appoint, elect or designate by succession appropriate leaders called for by the requirements and standards of any religion or belief; (h) To observe days of rest and to celebrate holidays and ceremonies in accordance with the precepts of one's religion or belief; Human Rights Without Frontiers Int’l | 2016 Prisoners List 1 (i) To establish and maintain communications with individuals and communities in matters of religion and belief at the national and international levels. EU Guidelines on Freedom of Religion or Belief In June 2013, the EU adopted Guidelines on Freedom of Religion or Belief, which signifies a commitment by the EU to mainstream these principles and sends a strong message to all countries that do not respect them. By adopting the Guidelines, the EU acknowledges that religious freedom violations, committed by state and non-state actors alike, are widespread and complex, affecting societies and individuals everywhere, including in Europe. It also clarifies the EU’s own position towards religion or belief, not aligning itself with any specific view or conviction but upholding the right of the individual to choose, change, adopt, or abandon a conviction according to one’s conscience. The Guidelines are an important tool for EU officials in third countries to assist citizens who have been victims of violations of their right to freedom of religion or belief and discrimination. Our Annual Report this year focuses on countries which imprison people for exercising their right to freedom of religion or belief as defined by Article 18 of the ICCPR and Article 6 of the 1981 UN Declaration of the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief. Each country report comprises several sections: Introduction Cases of prisoners per religious or belief minority Laws used to criminalize religious activities National standards for detention conditions National and international reports on prison conditions in each country Conclusions The report is meant to provide a tool to the relevant EU actors who should contribute to the improvement of FoRB in countries of particular concern prioritize the minorities which need to be protected and defended try to get the release of believers and non-believers who were illegally arrested and imprisoned, being aware of their detention conditions. Human Rights Without Frontiers Int’l | 2016 Prisoners List 2 State repression of legitimate activities of members of religious or belief groups Quite a number of UN Member States fail to abide by UN standards and even criminalise individual and collective rights related to freedom of religion or belief (FoRB). The state repression may include the death penalty, various forms of physical punishment, prison terms and exorbitant fines, sometimes of up to one hundred times the minimum monthly salary. The death penalty is a violation of the right to life and usually concerns the change of religion or (alleged) blasphemy cases in a number of Muslim majority countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Maldives, Mauritania, Morocco, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen. Physical punishments, such as lashing, flogging, and caning, are unquestionably torture as well as inhuman and degrading treatments. They are usually implemented in some Muslim majority countries in cases of change of religion, blasphemy, or allegedly offensive statements related to FoRB issues. Imprisonment is another form of state repression that is often used on the basis of laws criminalising the mere affiliation to or identification with a specific religious or belief group that may be banned or ostracised the public expression of atheism and agnosticism the questioning of official religious teachings the conversion to a minority religion or denomination proselytising by minority religious or belief groups worship and religious meetings by peaceful groups that are not allowed to operate because they are not state-sanctioned or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View / Download 7.3 Mb
    Between Shanghai and Mecca: Diaspora and Diplomacy of Chinese Muslims in the Twentieth Century by Janice Hyeju Jeong Department of History Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Engseng Ho, Advisor ___________________________ Prasenjit Duara, Advisor ___________________________ Nicole Barnes ___________________________ Adam Mestyan ___________________________ Cemil Aydin Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 ABSTRACT Between Shanghai and Mecca: Diaspora and Diplomacy of Chinese Muslims in the Twentieth Century by Janice Hyeju Jeong Department of History Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Engseng Ho, Advisor ___________________________ Prasenjit Duara, Advisor ___________________________ Nicole Barnes ___________________________ Adam Mestyan ___________________________ Cemil Aydin An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 Copyright by Janice Hyeju Jeong 2019 Abstract While China’s recent Belt and the Road Initiative and its expansion across Eurasia is garnering public and scholarly attention, this dissertation recasts the space of Eurasia as one connected through historic Islamic networks between Mecca and China. Specifically, I show that eruptions of
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Human Rights in Yemen
    Report on Human Rights in Yemen Submitted by Human Rights Watch To the UN Human Rights Committee on the Occasion of its Review of Yemen in March 2012 February 1, 2012 This memorandum provides an overview of Human Rights Watch’s main concerns with respect to the human rights situation in the Republic of Yemen, submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Committee (“the Committee”) in advance of its review of Yemen in March 2012. We hope it will inform the Committee’s review of the government’s compliance with its obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“the Covenant”). It has been seven years since Yemen last submitted its State Report to the Committee. During this time, the government has engaged in systematic violations of the Covenant, including extensive restrictions on the rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, and association, and the use of ill-treatment and unfair trials of political detainees. Yemen continues to have one of the highest execution rates in the world. The government dramatically intensified its targeting of human rights defenders and journalists during its suppression of a secessionist movement in the south starting in 2007, and during nationwide protests seeking the resignation of President Ali Abdullah Saleh in 2011. Yemen submitted its latest report to the Committee 14 months before the state’s security forces began a violent crackdown against largely peaceful demonstrators and opposition activists demanding the resignation of President Saleh.1 Attacks by pro-government gangs 1 Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 40 of the Covenant, Fifth periodic report of States parties, Yemen, CCPR/C/YEM/5, December 14, 2009, http://daccess-ods.un.org/TMP/8811841.01104736.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Kuwait Submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee
    KUWAIT SUBMISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE 117TH SESSION, 20 JUNE- 15 JULY 2016 Amnesty International Publications First published in 2016 by Amnesty International Publications International Secretariat Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom www.amnesty.org © Amnesty International Publications 2016 Index: MDE 17/4145/2016 Original Language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. accompan CONTENTS INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Situation of Human Rights in Yemen, Including Violations and Abuses Since September 2014
    United Nations A/HRC/39/43* General Assembly Distr.: General 17 August 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty-ninth session 10–28 September 2018 Agenda items 2 and 10 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Technical assistance and capacity-building Situation of human rights in Yemen, including violations and abuses since September 2014 Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights containing the findings of the Group of Eminent International and Regional Experts and a summary of technical assistance provided by the Office of the High Commissioner to the National Commission of Inquiry** Summary The present report is being submitted to the Human Rights Council in accordance with Council resolution 36/31. Part I of the report contains the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Group of Eminent International and Regional Experts on Yemen. Part II provides an account of the technical assistance provided by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to the National Commission of Inquiry into abuses and violations of human rights in Yemen. * Reissued for technical reasons on 27 September 2018. ** The annexes to the present report are circulated as received, in the language of submission only. GE.18-13655(E) A/HRC/39/43 Contents Page I. Findings of the Group of Eminent International and Regional Experts on Yemen ....................... 3 A. Introduction and mandate ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Organisations on 5 Continents
    FIDH represents 164 human rights organisations on 5 continents FIDH - International Federation for Human Rights 17, passage de la Main-d’Or - 75011 Paris - France CCP Paris: 76 76 Z Tel: (33-1) 43 55 25 18 / Fax: (33-1) 43 55 18 80 www.fi dh.org ANNUAL REPORT 2011 ANNUAL REPORT 2011 Cover: © AFP/MOHAMMED ABED Egypt, 16 December 2011. 04 Our Fundamentals 06 164 member organisations 07 International Board 08 International Secretariat 10 Priority 1 Protect and support human rights defenders 15 Priority 2 Promote and protect women’s rights 19 Priority 3 Promote and protect migrants’ rights 24 Priority 4 Promote the administration of justice and the i ght against impunity 33 Priority 5 Strengthening respect for human rights in the context of globalisation 38 Priority 6 Mobilising the community of States 43 Priority 7 Support the respect for human rights and the rule of law in conl ict and emergency situations, or during political transition 44 > Asia 49 > Eastern Europe and Central Asia 54 > North Africa and Middle East 59 > Sub-Saharan Africa 64 > The Americas 68 Internal challenges 78 Financial report 2011 79 They support us Our Fundamentals Our mandate: Protect all rights Interaction: Local presence - global action The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) is an As a federal movement, FIDH operates on the basis of interac- international NGO. It defends all human rights - civil, political, tion with its member organisations. It ensures that FIDH merges economic, social and cultural - as contained in the Universal on-the-ground experience and knowledge with expertise in inter- Declaration of Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Codes for Each Court of Each Level
    Table of Codes for Each Court of Each Level Corresponding Type Chinese Court Region Court Name Administrative Name Code Code Area Supreme People’s Court 最高人民法院 最高法 Higher People's Court of 北京市高级人民 Beijing 京 110000 1 Beijing Municipality 法院 Municipality No. 1 Intermediate People's 北京市第一中级 京 01 2 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Shijingshan Shijingshan District People’s 北京市石景山区 京 0107 110107 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Municipality Haidian District of Haidian District People’s 北京市海淀区人 京 0108 110108 Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Mentougou Mentougou District People’s 北京市门头沟区 京 0109 110109 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Municipality Changping Changping District People’s 北京市昌平区人 京 0114 110114 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Yanqing County People’s 延庆县人民法院 京 0229 110229 Yanqing County 1 Court No. 2 Intermediate People's 北京市第二中级 京 02 2 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Dongcheng Dongcheng District People’s 北京市东城区人 京 0101 110101 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Xicheng District Xicheng District People’s 北京市西城区人 京 0102 110102 of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Fengtai District of Fengtai District People’s 北京市丰台区人 京 0106 110106 Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality 1 Fangshan District Fangshan District People’s 北京市房山区人 京 0111 110111 of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Daxing District of Daxing District People’s 北京市大兴区人 京 0115
    [Show full text]
  • Specific Mditions Is That the Phohmpy Or Reproduction Is Not to Be “Used
    .. ....... .. I. ... ., ... : .. , . j;. ..... .. .... The Copyright law of the United States (title 17, United States Code) governs the making of phwtmwpies or wtha reproductiwns of mpyrighted material. Under cetZBin conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorid to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific mditions is that the phohmpy or reproduction is not to be “Used fir my purpose other than private study, schdanhip, or research.” If B user make3 a quest far, or later uses, a photompy or repductim for puqmses in ecess of ‘‘fair we9’’that user may be liable for mpyright infringement, This institution reserves the right to rehe to accept a copying order if, in its judgmenk fulfitlrnent of the order would involve violation ofcoMght Jaw- By the using this materid, you are couwnting t~ abide by this copyright policy, Any duplication, reprodndinn, nr modification of this material without express waitken consent from Asbuv Theological Seminary andhr the original publisher is prohibited. Q Asbury TheoIogi@alSeminary 2009 B. L. Fisher Library Asbuy Ssrnhww 404 North Lexington Ave Witmore, W 40390 ASEURY SEMINARY 1090281833 ABSTRACT KOREAN IMMIGRANTS AND THEIR MISSION: EXPLORING THE MISSIONAL IDENTITY OF KOREAN IMMIGRANT CHURCHES IN NORTH AMERICA Sinyil Kim This is a study of Korean immigrants and their mission, investigating the way Scripture, self-identity, and mission are understood among Korean immigrants in the United States and Canada. The rationale for study was the observation that even though Korean immigrants have often formed very church-centered communities and are involved in mission in many ways, their sense of Christian identity as immigrants, and the missional implications of this status, remain largely undeveloped.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Obligations in Military Occupation Noam Lubell Noam Lubell Is Reader in Law at the School of Law, University of Essex, UK
    Volume 94 Number 885 Spring 2012 Human rights obligations in military occupation Noam Lubell Noam Lubell is Reader in Law at the School of Law, University of Essex, UK. Abstract This article examines the applicability of international human rights law in situations of military occupation. Proceeding from the position that human rights obligations can exist in these circumstances, the article provides an analysis of the precise modalities of application. It examines the tests for the determination of human rights applicability, and how these are linked to the concept of occupation. Finally, it recognizes the practical and legal challenges to the implementation of human rights obligations, and argues for a contextual approach that provides for human rights protection while recognizing the realities of military occupation. Keywords: military occupation, human rights obligations, applicability, occupying power, territorial control, contextual approach, economic, social and cultural rights. This article examines the applicability of international human rights law in situations of military occupation. That human rights obligations exist in some form in these circumstances should, by now, be firmly established and have wide support. Nonetheless, there remains room for further analysis of the precise modalities of application, questioning how far the human rights obligations stretch, and how this notion might be affected by practical and legal challenges to implementation. The article begins with an examination of the tests for deter- mination of applicability of human rights law, and the link between the established authority of an Occupying Power and the notion of territorial control required for human rights law obligations. Recognizing the possible impediments to total fulfilment of all rights, an analysis is provided, suggesting the need for a contextual doi:10.1017/S1816383112000367 317 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Violations of the Right of Ngos to Funding: from Harassment to Criminalisation
    2013 “The topic of this year’s report is most pertinent as lately we have witnessed increased stigmatization and undue restrictions in relation to access to funding and resources for civil society organizations, in REPORT ANNUAL an attempt to stifle any forms of criticism, especially calls for democratic change or accountability for human rights violations. [...] I am particularly dismayed about laws or policies stigmatizing recipients due to their sources of funding, which have been adopted in the past months or are under consideration, Violations of the right in several countries across the world”. “I am confident that the Observatory report and my work in this field will be complementary and of NGOs to funding: mutually beneficial. I hope our joint efforts will succeed and will pave the way for better respect of the right to freedom of association, especially its core component, the access to funding and resources, in all parts of the world. It is ultimately the obligation of Member States to fully protect this right, OMCTFIDH - from harassment which shall be enjoyed by everyone”. Maina Kiai, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association. to criminalisation The Annual Report 2013 of the Observatory provides a global review of the violations of the right of NGOs to funding. It provides a detailed picture of this as yet little studied problem, the growing Foreword by Maina Kiai dimension of which is a worrying concern. This picture is illustrated with around thirty country situations affecting human rights organisations. While recalling the legal basis of this right, as well as its organic relationship with the right to freedom of association and the embryonic jurisprudence on this subject, the report stimulates deep reflection on the negative impacts of these restrictive measures and makes concrete recommendations to all relevant stakeholders (beneficiaries, donors, governments and intergovernmental organisations).
    [Show full text]
  • The Christian Witness in the Context of Poverty
    University of Pretoria etd – Mathole, E M K (2005) THE CHRISTIAN WITNESS IN THE CONTEXT OF POVERTY WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE SOUTH AFRICAN CHARISMATIC EVANGELICALS By EZEKIEL MOKWELE KATISO MATHOLE Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR (PHD) In the Faculty of Theology of the UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA PROMOTOR: Prof. PGJ Meiring Department of Science of Religion and Missiology PRETORIA MARCH 2005 University of Pretoria etd – Mathole, E M K (2005) TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi DEDICATION vii SUMMARY viii KEY TERMS ix ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS x 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 The Problem Statement 3 1.3 Goal of Study 4 1.4 Research Methods 6 1.5 Definition of Terms 7 1.6 Overview 17 2. THE MANY/HUMAN FACES OF POVERTY IN SA 20 2.1 The Prevalence of Poverty 20 2.2 The Causes of Poverty in South Africa 23 2.2.1 Poverty and Inequality 23 2.2.2 Poverty and Race 26 2.2.3 Poverty and Gender 29 2.2.4 Poverty and Children 31 2.2.5 Poverty and Class 33 2.2.6 Poverty and Education 34 2.2.7 Poverty and Unemployment 35 2.2.8 City/ Urban and Rural Poverty 36 2.2.9 Regions and Poverty 38 2.2.10 Poverty as a Systemic Problem 39 2.3 The Experience of the Poor 40 2.3.1 Basic Needs 41 2.3.2 Vulnerability 42 2.3.3 Crime and Violence 42 2.3.4 Substance Abuse 44 2.3.5 Social Exclusion 46 2.3.6 Unemployment 47 2.4 The Dehumanising Power of Poverty 49 2.5 Poverty, Illness and Death 56 2.6 Hope for the Poor 59 2.7 Conclusion 62 i University of Pretoria etd – Mathole, E M K (2005) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Governance Practice in the GCC: Kuwait As a Case Study
    Corporate Governance Practice In the GCC: Kuwait As A Case Study Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Mohammad E. Al-Wasmi LLB, LLM School of Law Brunel University December 2011 Abstract Corporate governance practice has recently become an important topic around the world and specifically within the emerging stock markets in order to avoid expropriation by corporate management at the expense of minority shareholders. Although corporate governance is considered to be tremendously important in many countries, whether developed or developing, corporate governance does not exist in Kuwait as a mean of shareholder protection. This thesis intends to provide a regulatory analysis to laws and regulations that should be implemented to regulate corporate governance practice in Kuwait in private companies and in the State-Owned Enterprises. The second chapter draws a theoretical framework of corporate governance. These theories must be discussed, because this thesis is the first to address corporate governance from a legal perspective and will help Kuwaiti practitioners and those involved in corporate governance practice to gain a better and more comprehensive understanding of and appreciation for effective corporate governance. The third chapter provides an overview of the corporate governance practice in the emerging markets. The fourth chapter presents the characteristics of a corporate culture to lay the groundwork for adopting corporate governance that will fit within the Kuwaiti culture. The fifth chapter offers an assessment of the institutional settings necessary to establish a sound corporate governance system in Kuwait, including legal and political institutions. The sixth chapter will examine corporate governance practice in the State-Owned Enterprises in Kuwait.
    [Show full text]
  • To View the Report
    2009 White Paper on Religious Freedom in North Korea Date of Publication March 20, 2009 Authors Yeo‐sang Yoon, Sun‐young Han Publisher Sang‐hun Kim Publisher Database Center for North Korean Human Rights (NKDB) Registration Date May 8, 2007 Registration Number 300‐2007‐86 110-053 Samho building 3rd Floor, 30 Naeja-dong, Jongno-gu, Seoul Phone 02‐723‐6045 Fax 02‐723‐6046 Website http://www.nkdb.org E‐mail [email protected] ISBN 978‐89‐93739‐06‐0 Quoting or citing the contents of the book without a permission of the authors and publisher is prohibited. The publication was made possible by the assistance and contribution provided by the US Commission on International Religious Freedom. NKDB-2009 White Paper 2009 White Paper on Religious Freedom in North Korea Yeo-sang Yoon Director North Korean Human Rights Archives Sun-young Han Research Fellow Database Center for North Korean Human Rights On the Publication of the "2009 White Paper on Religious Freedom in North Korea" The North Korean Human Rights Archives (NKHRA) of the Database Center for North Korean Human Rights (NKDB) has published the "2009 White Paper on Religious Freedom in North Korea" following a similar one for 2008. The "2009 White Paper on Religious Freedom in North Korea" is a report on the human rights situation in North Korea based on the results of a survey of 2,047 North Korean defectors who have arrived in South Korea since 2007, as well as on analysis of 6,965 cases of human rights abuses in the North as of December 2008 (compared with 4,142 cases in 2007) and on information about 5,272 North Koreans involved in human rights abuses in the same year (compared with 3,131 in 2007).
    [Show full text]