Dáil Éireann

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dáil Éireann Vol. 699 Wednesday, No. 2 20 January 2010 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Wednesday, 20 January 2010. Leaders’ Questions ……………………………… 567 Ceisteanna—Questions Taoiseach ………………………………… 576 Requests to move Adjournment of Dáil under Standing Order 32 ……………… 585 Order of Business ……………………………… 586 European Council Meeting: Statements ……………………… 597 Ceisteanna—Questions (resumed) Minister for Defence Priority Questions …………………………… 614 Other Questions …………………………… 626 Private Notice Questions Industrial Action ……………………………… 638 Operational Co-operation on EU Internal Security: Motion………………… 646 Adjournment Debate Matters …………………………… 655 Planning and Development (Amendment) Bill 2009 [Seanad]: Second Stage (resumed)………656 Private Members’ Business Banking Crisis: Motion (resumed) ……………………… 675 Adjournment Debate Job Creation ……………………………… 702 Substance Abuse ……………………………… 704 Tourism Promotion …………………………… 706 School Libraries ……………………………… 709 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 711 DÁIL ÉIREANN ———— Dé Céadaoin, 20 Eanáir 2010. Wednesday, 20 January 2010. ———— Chuaigh an Ceann Comhairle i gceannas ar 10.30 a.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Leaders’ Questions. Deputy Enda Kenny: Yesterday we had a number of questions, statements and the debate on a Labour Party motion in respect of the banking crisis and an investigation into that. The Government has published its proposals. Those proposals do not take into account the extent of public anger that is out there. I agree with the words of the Minister for Finance this morning when he said that what the public want to see is the law of the land implemented in respect of malpractice in banks and financial institutions. Two investigations are ongoing in that regard, one by the Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement and another by the fraud squad. I had hoped those investigations would have been brought to a conclusion earlier, but they are proceeding. When one considers the back- to-back loans, for instance, that were in evidence, which were electronic transactions, an investi- gation could have been completed in two hours and a file prepared for the DPP. In any event, the position in so far as the Government is now concerned is that there will be no forensic analysis of regulatory and policy failures or internal and audit competency that the public will be able to see. The public could see what happened with the committee of investigation into the Iraq war in Britain, or the financial inquiry commission in the United States. The Government has made a strong defence of the commission of investigation facility by saying the Murphy inquiry worked well, as did a number of other inquiries, which they did, but the victims in those cases were children who were victims of sexual abuse and the inquiries had to be held in private. The victims in these cases are the working taxpayers of this country who are now faced with pensions lost, negative equity, difficulty in paying mortgages and an understanding and percep- tion that white collar crime does pay. The way the Government published its proposals yesterday means there will be no forensic public analysis of what happened. It effectively means the Taoiseach, as a former Minister for Finance, who has said he wants to co-operate fully in any way he can, will not be called before an Oireachtas committee to give evidence. Why would that happen if what I assume is being talked about takes place, that the committee in question would be chaired by a member of the Fianna Fáil Party and would be most unlikely to call the Taoiseach, Deputy Cowen, the former Taoiseach, Deputy Bertie Ahern, or the former Minister for Finance, Mr. Charlie McCreevy? In effect, the Government proposals for the scoping facility, the terms of reference for the commission of investigation and an Oireachtas committee being sidelined to the role of com- 567 Leaders’ 20 January 2010. Questions [Deputy Enda Kenny.] mentator means that there will not be public scrutiny and members of the public will not be able to see what happens in respect of the regulatory and policy failures that are concerned. Does the Taoiseach accept that, in effect, following the proposals announced in a gushing fashion by the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Deputy Gormley, after his green summit with Fianna Fáil, the Taoiseach will never have to give evi- dence in public to account for policy positions adopted by him and his colleagues in Government? Deputies: Hear, hear. The Taoiseach: Deputy Kenny is talking patent nonsense. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan: He is telling the truth and the Taoiseach knows it. Deputy P. J. Sheehan: The truth is bitter. The Taoiseach: The continuing allegations being made by him have no substance. The reverse is the case. What is proposed is designed to discover the true causes of the banking crisis—— Deputy Pádraic McCormack: That you reversed last night. The Taoiseach: ——not what people think or assume are the causes, and to do so through the use of the best available expertise and in a timely and cost effective manner. The framework which has been brought forward by Government seeks to learn from the lessons of the past where inquiries have gone on for too long and to ensure that answers are obtained as quickly as possible and within a timeframe in which they can inform what needs to be done. Ireland’s international reputation would not be assisted by an inefficient inquiry that is not focused. Such an inquiry would not serve the public as it would inhibit, not assist, the steps necessary for recovery. Each of the three essential stages of the inquiry involves the Oireachtas or uses a process determined by it. The first stage involves a preliminary consideration of the causes of the regulatory failures and banking crisis by independent experts. The Oireachtas will be involved from the beginning because the Oireachtas committee will meet the Governor of the Central Bank and the independent expert or experts at the outset to brief them on the priorities of the Oireachtas for investigation. Those experts will independently consider what happened, provide their preliminary view on the causes, decide what needs to be done and the further investigation that needs to be carried out. Deputy Jim O’Keeffe: Who does the Taoiseach have in mind? The Taoiseach: The second stage uses a process—— Deputy P. J. Sheehan: Paddy the plasterer. The Taoiseach: ——the commission of investigation, which the Oireachtas has determined — based on the lessons of the past — is an efficient and cost effective method of inquiry whose independence is guaranteed. Deputy Pádraic McCormack: The Taoiseach must have been expecting the question. The Taoiseach: That method of inquiry has worked well in the past, most recently in the context of the Murphy report. The commission of investigation has been provided by the 568 Leaders’ 20 January 2010. Questions Oireachtas with all the powers the Oireachtas believes are necessary to enable it to investigate a matter of significant public concern. The tight timeline for the work will ensure the report of the commission is available to the Oireachtas for further consideration and action as quickly as possible thereafter. That method of inquiry has been supported and a law passed by the Oireachtas which some Members now seem to claim constitutes a whitewash. The third stage involves the consideration of the report by the Oireachtas and action by an appropriate Oireachtas committee. The suggestion that the inquiry is a whitewash because hearings will be in private makes no sense. It is the findings and recommendations that are of importance. These will be published, considered and debated. Those that make the allegation of a whitewash are really complaining that not every wild allegation can be published or proffered. The public are interested in balanced findings that ascertain what went wrong and provide guidance as to how mistakes can be avoided in the future. We have outlined a means by which an independent statutory inquiry can take place by assembling the facts through the reports that will be done by the governor and an indepen- dent expert, and to proceed thereafter as the Oireachtas sees fit. Deputy Pádraic McCormack: The reports will be censored. Deputy Seymour Crawford: Where are the Greens? Deputy Enda Kenny: It may well be that the governor of the Central Bank, a person to whom no fault can be imputed, wants an inquiry because the Central Bank was obviously centrally involved in this. I want to ask the Taoiseach two further questions. First, he said that when the commission of investigation completes its work, it will all be done in private. The findings of the commission of investigation, as the Taoiseach said, will be published, considered and debated by the Oireachtas committee, presumably under the control of a Fianna Fáil chairman. What is the function of that consideration if, for example, somebody produces evidence of a “deep throat” nature that was not considered by the commission of investigation? Will the Oireachtas com- mittee have the opportunity and responsibility for further investigation, if necessary? Will it be in a position to change the published findings of the commission of investigation if such evi- dence were to come forward? Second, my contention is that, under the current structure, neither the Taoiseach, Mr. Charlie McCreevy or Deputy Bertie Ahern, as people involved in the Department of Finance and high political
Recommended publications
  • Da´Il E´Ireann
    Vol. 669 Thursday, No. 4 4 December 2008 DI´OSPO´ IREACHTAI´ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DA´ IL E´ IREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIU´ IL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Thursday, 4 December 2008. Requests to move Adjournment of Da´il under Standing Order 32 ……………… 713 Order of Business ……………………………… 713 Planning and Development (Enforcement Proceedings) Bill 2008: First Stage ………… 728 Criminal Justice (Drug Trafficking) Act 1996: Motion ………………… 728 Finance (No. 2) Bill 2008: Allocation of Time Motion ………………………… 728 Financial Resolutions …………………………… 729 Social Weflare (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2008: Report Stage (resumed) and Final Stages … … 732 Ceisteanna—Questions Minister for Education and Science Priority Questions …………………………… 780 Other Questions …………………………… 791 Adjournment Debate Matters …………………………… 797 Messages from Select Committees ………………………… 797 Estimates for Public Services 2008: Message from Select Committee …………… 797 Adjournment Debate Financial Services Regulation ………………………… 797 Social Welfare Benefits …………………………… 800 School Accommodation …………………………… 802 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 805 DA´ IL E´ IREANN ———— De´ardaoin, 4 Nollaig 2008. Thursday, 4 December 2008. ———— Chuaigh an Leas-Cheann Comhairle i gceannas ar 10.30 a.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Requests to move Adjournment of Da´il under Standing Order 32. An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: Before coming to the Order of Business, I propose to deal with a number of notices under Standing Order 32. I will call the Deputies in the order in which their notices were submitted to my office. Deputy Finian McGrath: I seek the adjournment of the Da´il under Standing Order 32 to debate the following urgent matter of national importance, namely, the recent information that members of the British National Party are living and operating in this country, particularly in Santry, Sligo, Galway and Kerry;—— A Deputy: They are looking for European seats here.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Business and Society: Governing, Participating and Transforming in the 21St Century
    Technological University Dublin ARROW@TU Dublin Books/Book Chapters School of Marketing 2011-1 Irish Business and Society: Governing, Participating and Transforming in the 21st Century John Hogan Technological University Dublin, [email protected] Paul Donnelly Technological University Dublin, [email protected] Brendan O'Rourke Technological University Dublin, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/buschmarbk Part of the Business Commons, Law Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Hogan, J., Donnelly, P., O’Rourke, B. (eds) (2010) Irish Business and Society: Governing, Participating and Transforming in the 21st Century. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Marketing at ARROW@TU Dublin. It has been accepted for inclusion in Books/Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of ARROW@TU Dublin. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License Edited by John Hogan Paul F. Donnelly & Brendan K. O’Rourke Irish Business & Society Governing, Participating & Transforming in the 21st Century Irish Business and Society Governing, Participating and Transforming in the 21st Century Edited by JOHN HOGAN, PAUL F. DONNELLY AND BRENDAN K. O'ROURKE 'Irish Business and Societ), presents the best of Irish social science, neatly packaged around themes of governance, participation and transformation. Many of these original chapters are brilliantly crafted, and while they show an Ireland slipping off a time of rapid growth, themes of hope abound in enterprise, social and economic partnership, civil society, social inclusion and Europeanization.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF(All Devices)
    Published by: The Irish Times Limited (Irish Times Books) © The Irish Times 2014. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of The Irish Times Limited, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographic rights organisation or as expressly permitted by law. Contents Watching from a window as we all stay the same ................................................................ 4 Emigration- an Irish guarantor of continuity ........................................................................ 7 Completing a transaction called Ireland ................................................................................ 9 In the land of wink and nod ................................................................................................. 13 Rhetoric, reality and the proper Charlie .............................................................................. 16 The rise to becoming a beggar on horseback ...................................................................... 19 The real spiritual home of Fianna Fáil ................................................................................ 21 Electorate gives ethics the cold shoulders ........................................................................... 24 Corruption well known – and nothing was done ................................................................ 26 Questions the IRA is happy to ignore ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    Vol. 761 Wednesday, No. 1 28 March 2012 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Dé Céadaoin, 28 Márta 2012. Leaders’ Questions ……………………………… 1 Order of Business ……………………………… 9 Topical Issue Matters ……………………………… 16 Landlord and Tenant (Business Leases Rent Review) Bill 2012: First Stage ………… 17 Mahon Tribunal Report: Statements (Resumed)…………………… 17 Message from Seanad ……………………………… 46 Ceisteanna — Questions Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport Priority Questions …………………………… 46 Other Questions …………………………… 55 Topical Issue Debate Emigrant Voting Rights …………………………… 66 Social Welfare Appeals …………………………… 68 Rent Supplement ……………………………… 70 Job Protection ……………………………… 72 Mahon Tribunal Report: Statements (resumed)…………………… 76 Message from Seanad ……………………………… 111 Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland (Amendment) Bill 2011: Second Stage (resumed)……………………………111 Referral to Select Sub-Committee ……………………… 128 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 129 DÁIL ÉIREANN DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL OFFICIAL REPORT Imleabhar 761 Volume 761 Dé Céadaoin, 28 Márta 2012. Wednesday, 28 March 2012. ———— Chuaigh an Ceann Comhairle i gceannas ar 10.30 a.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Leaders’ Questions Deputy Micheál Martin: The former Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, John Gormley, established an independent review into the planning practices in a number of local authorities and had undertaken considerable work to ensure these would be completed. Deputy Pat Rabbitte: Is Deputy Martin interested in corruption in planning now? Deputy Micheál Martin: I will come to that. Why are the Minister, Deputy Phil Hogan, the Minister of State, Deputy Alan Kelly, and the Minister of State, Deputy Kehoe, misleading the public by suggesting that the former Minister, Mr. Gormley, had done nothing to progress his independent reviews of planning practices in a number of local authorities? It is more than one year since he took office.
    [Show full text]
  • Tony Heffernan Papers P180 Ucd Archives
    TONY HEFFERNAN PAPERS P180 UCD ARCHIVES [email protected] www.ucd.ie/archives T + 353 1 716 7555 F + 353 1 716 1146 © 2013 University College Dublin. All rights reserved ii CONTENTS CONTEXT Administrative History iv Archival History v CONTENT AND STRUCTURE Scope and Content vi System of Arrangement viii CONDITIONS OF ACCESS AND USE Access x Language x Finding Aid x DESCRIPTION CONTROL Archivist’s Note x ALLIED MATERIALS Published Material x iii CONTEXT Administrative History The Tony Heffernan Papers represent his long association with the Workers’ Party, from his appointment as the party’s press officer in July 1982 to his appointment as Assistant Government Press Secretary, as the Democratic Left nominee in the Rainbow Coalition government between 1994 and 1997. The papers provide a significant source for the history of the development of the party and its policies through the comprehensive series of press statements issued over many years. In January 1977 during the annual Sinn Féin Árd Fheis members voted for a name change and the party became known as Sinn Féin the Workers’ Party. A concerted effort was made in the late 1970s to increase the profile and political representation of the party. In 1979 Tomás MacGiolla won a seat in Ballyfermot in the local elections in Dublin. Two years later in 1981 the party saw its first success at national level with the election of Joe Sherlock in Cork East as the party’s first TD. In 1982 Sherlock, Paddy Gallagher and Proinsias de Rossa all won seats in the general election. In 1981 the Árd Fheis voted in favour of another name change to the Workers’ Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    Vol. 706 Thursday, No. 2 1 April 2010 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Thursday, 1 April 2010. Requests to move Adjournment of Dáil under Standing Order 32 ……………… 185 Order of Business ……………………………… 187 Guardianship of Children Bill 2010: First Stage …………………… 205 EU Directive: Motion ……………………………… 205 Banking System: Statements …………………………… 205 Obesity Levels: Statements …………………………… 243 Ceisteanna — Questions Minister for Community, Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs Priority Questions …………………………… 261 Other Questions …………………………… 271 Adjournment Debate Matters …………………………… 278 Adjournment Debate Drug Treatment Programme ………………………… 278 Overseas Missions……………………………… 279 Turbary Rights ……………………………… 282 Dublin Docklands Development Authority …………………… 284 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 287 DÁIL ÉIREANN ———— Déardaoin, 1 Aibreán 2010. Thursday, 1 April 2010. ———— Chuaigh an Ceann Comhairle i gceannas ar 10.30 a.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Requests to move Adjournment of Dáil under Standing Order 32. An Ceann Comhairle: Before coming to the Order of Business, I propose to deal with a number of notices under Standing Order 32. I will call on the Deputies in the order in which they submitted their notices to my office. Deputy Finian McGrath: I seek the Adjournment of the Dáil under Standing Order 32 to raise a matter of national importance, namely, the urgent need to support all people with a disability; the need to welcome the report by the Irish Human Rights Commission on how the way disability services are to be funded by the State needs to be radically changed; the need to welcome Down Syndrome Ireland’s campaign, My Opinion My Vote, which demands easy- to-read information from all politicians; to support the urgent need for increased services including speech and language and occupational therapy in particular; and calls on all Members of the Oireachtas to defend and support services for all people with a disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    Vol. 984 Wednesday, No. 3 26 June 2019. DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Insert Date Here 26/06/2019A00100Ceisteanna - Questions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 247 26/06/2019A00200Ceisteanna ar Sonraíodh Uain Dóibh - Priority Questions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 247 26/06/2019A00300Internet Pornography � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 247 26/06/2019B00300Online Safety � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 249 26/06/2019C00150Crime Prevention � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 251 26/06/2019C00850Sentencing Policy � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 253 26/06/2019D00950Ceisteanna Eile - Other Questions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 255 26/06/2019D01000Crime Data � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 255 26/06/2019E00650Crime Levels � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
    [Show full text]
  • OIR : Core Book 53
    TUARASCÁIL ón gComhchoiste Fiosrúcháin i dtaobh na Géarchéime Baincéireachta An tAcht um Thithe an Oireachtais (Fiosrúcháin, Pribhléidí agus Nósanna Imeachta), 2013 REPORT of the Joint Committee of Inquiry into the Banking Crisis Houses of the Oireachtas (Inquiries, Privileges and Procedures) Act, 2013 Volume 1: Report Volume 2: Inquiry Framework Volume 3: Evidence Oireachtas OIR : Core Book 53 January 2016 Table of contents – by line of inquiry R5: Clarity and effectiveness of the Government and Oireachtas oversight and role R5d: Appropriateness of relationships between Government , the Oireachtas , banking sector and the property sector Bates Number Description Page [Relevant Pages] DOT00716 018 Letter from Alan Cooke Chief Executive Officer IAVI (Extract) 2-3 [001-002] DOT00727 Letter from Sean McEniff Tyrconnell Group, July 2000 (Extract) 4-6 [001-003] DOT00728 Letter from Taoiseach to Sean McEniff 25 July 2000 (Extract) 7-8 [001-002] Memo to Taoiseach and Letter from Hooke McDonald June 2000 DOT00729 9 (Extract) [001] Fax message from Taoiseach to DoE enclosing letter from Ken DOT00730 10-13 McDonald [001-004] DOT00736 Minutes of Taoiseach’s Meeting with Ken McDonald 20 09 2000 14 [001] DOT00745 Letter from O’Flynn, 27th April, 2004 15 [001] DOT00749 Briefing Note for meeting with O’Flynn 08 July 04 (Extract) 16 [001] DOT00750 Letter from Noel O’Callaghan to Dept of Taoiseach on planning 17-19 [001-003] DOT00751 52 Letter and enclosure from O’Flynn Construction (Extract) 20-23 [001-004] PUB00333 Interview with Brian Dobson 26 Sep
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    Vol. 1007 Wednesday, No. 6 26 May 2021 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Insert Date Here 26/05/2021A00300Saincheisteanna Tráthúla - Topical Issue Debate � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 759 26/05/2021A00400Heritage Sites� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 759 26/05/2021B01100Rental Sector � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 762 26/05/2021C00450Employment Rights � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 765 26/05/2021E00200Invasive Species Policy � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 767 26/05/2021F00300 Independent Beef Regulator: Motion [Private Members] � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 770 26/05/2021S00350Ceisteanna ó Cheannairí - Leaders’ Questions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 798 26/05/2021W00100Ceisteanna ar Reachtaíocht a Gealladh - Questions on Promised Legislation � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 807 26/05/2021Z00400Ceisteanna - Questions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
    [Show full text]
  • In Plain Sight Responding to the Ferns, Ryan, Murphy and Cloyne Reports
    In Plain Sight Responding to the Ferns, Ryan, Murphy and Cloyne Reports Carole Holohan 1 In Plain Sight: Responding to the Ferns, Ryan, Murphy and Cloyne Reports Comissioned by Amnesty International Ireland Carole Holohan BA, MA, PhD is the primary author. Some research for chapters one and three was externally commissioned. Published September 2011 © Amnesty International Ireland Seán MacBride House 48 Fleet Street Dublin 2 Ireland Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism or review, no part of this document may be reproduced without permission. ISBN 978-0-9555600-4-0 Photography from 'The Echo of a Silent Cry' by Dianne Whyte. Typeset in Trade Gothic Design by swollen.ie Printed by Colorman In Plain Sight “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights”. Article 1, Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) Contents 7 Preface 14 The Advisory Group 15 Acknowledgements 17 Introduction 27 Summary and Key Findings 43 Chapter 1: The Human Rights Abuses 48 Children’s Rights 52 Specific Rights Abuses 52 Torture, Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment 67 Right to Private and Family Life 71 Due Process Rights for Children in Conflict with the Law 73 Right to be free from Slavery and Forced labour 75 Social and Economic Rights 77 Right to be free from Discrimination 79 Accountability for Human Rights Violations 79 The State 84 Private Individuals 86 Civil Society 103 Chapter 2: Why did this happen? 106 Responsibility and Accountability: Who was responsible? 106 Non-State Actors - Agents of the Roman
    [Show full text]
  • 219 Chapter 9 Gary Murphy a Private Affair? Lobbying and Transparency
    Chapter 9 Gary Murphy A private affair? Lobbying and transparency in modern Ireland Across the modern democratic world, lobbying governments and policy makers is considered integral to the process of policy formulation. The work carried out by interest groups is a central and legitimate part of the policy process within all liberal democratic systems. Although the term lobbying has often had negative connotations, the work of lobbyists is essential when policy is being formulated. Lobbyists are an accepted element within society, providing the necessary input and feedback into the political system, thereby helping to develop the policy outputs that drive political, social, cultural and economic aspects of people’s daily lives. Ireland is no different in this regard than any other democratic society. Lobbying in Ireland and the questions of private influence, access and expectation have come to the fore of public policy debates given the catastrophic collapse of the Irish economy since late 2008 and the role played by lobbyists in contemporary Irish politics. The dramatic fall of the so-called Celtic Tiger and the ensuing misery faced by the Irish people has brought the shadowy world of lobbying to the fore of Irish public consciousness. As unemployment and emigration dramatically increased and negative equity and house repossessions became common it quickly emerged that Ireland’s economic miracle of the 2000s was built on rather shaky foundations. But these were foundations that had been built under the urgings of lobbyists. In September 2008 the government decided to bail out the private banks, placing an enormous debt burden on the population, as well as ultimately bringing the IMF to 219 Ireland’s shore.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contemporary Irish Party: Campaign and Organisational Developments in a Changing Environment
    EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE Department of Political and Social Sciences THE CONTEMPORARY IRISH PARTY: CAMPAIGN AND ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT David M. Farrell Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the Degree of Doctor of the European University Institute Examining jury: Prof. Jean Blondel (European University Institute) Prof. Michael Laver (supervisor - Trinity College Dublin) Prof. Feter Mair (University of Leiden) Prof. Wolfgang Müller (University of Vienna) Prof. Richard Sinnoit (co-supervisor - University College Dublin) Florence, November 1993 30001006323820 © EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE Department of Political and Social Sciences LIB 329.0209 415 FAR THE £6NTEMPORARY IRISH PARTY: CAMPAIGN AND ORGAfit^AtlONAL DEVELOPMENTS IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT David M. Farrell Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the Degree of Doctor of the European University Institute Examining jury: Prof. Jean Blondel (European University Institute) Prof. Michael Laver (supervisor - Trinity College Dublin) Prof. Peter Mair (University of Leiden) Prof. Wolfgang Muller (University of Vienna) Prof. Richard Sinnott (co-supervisor - University College Dublin) Florence, November 1993 EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE Department of Political and Social Sciences THE CONTEMPORARY IRISH PARTY: CAMPAIGN AND ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT David M. Farrell Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the Degree of Doctor of the European University Institute Florence, November 1993 For my parents 1 CONTENTS List of Tables and Figures iii Acknowledgements v 1. Introduction: The Study of Irish Party Organisational Change 1 1.1. The Electoral Environment 4 1.2. The Irish Party System 7 1.3. Parties in Decline? 14 1.4. Outline of the Thesis 29 2.
    [Show full text]