Dáil Éireann

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dáil Éireann Vol. 761 Wednesday, No. 1 28 March 2012 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Dé Céadaoin, 28 Márta 2012. Leaders’ Questions ……………………………… 1 Order of Business ……………………………… 9 Topical Issue Matters ……………………………… 16 Landlord and Tenant (Business Leases Rent Review) Bill 2012: First Stage ………… 17 Mahon Tribunal Report: Statements (Resumed)…………………… 17 Message from Seanad ……………………………… 46 Ceisteanna — Questions Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport Priority Questions …………………………… 46 Other Questions …………………………… 55 Topical Issue Debate Emigrant Voting Rights …………………………… 66 Social Welfare Appeals …………………………… 68 Rent Supplement ……………………………… 70 Job Protection ……………………………… 72 Mahon Tribunal Report: Statements (resumed)…………………… 76 Message from Seanad ……………………………… 111 Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland (Amendment) Bill 2011: Second Stage (resumed)……………………………111 Referral to Select Sub-Committee ……………………… 128 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 129 DÁIL ÉIREANN DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL OFFICIAL REPORT Imleabhar 761 Volume 761 Dé Céadaoin, 28 Márta 2012. Wednesday, 28 March 2012. ———— Chuaigh an Ceann Comhairle i gceannas ar 10.30 a.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Leaders’ Questions Deputy Micheál Martin: The former Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, John Gormley, established an independent review into the planning practices in a number of local authorities and had undertaken considerable work to ensure these would be completed. Deputy Pat Rabbitte: Is Deputy Martin interested in corruption in planning now? Deputy Micheál Martin: I will come to that. Why are the Minister, Deputy Phil Hogan, the Minister of State, Deputy Alan Kelly, and the Minister of State, Deputy Kehoe, misleading the public by suggesting that the former Minister, Mr. Gormley, had done nothing to progress his independent reviews of planning practices in a number of local authorities? It is more than one year since he took office. Why is there still no outcome to his internal reviews nine months after he suppressed the independent reviews the former Minister, Mr. Gormley, established? I wish to put on the record of the House what the Minister, Deputy Hogan, had on his desk when he arrived into office. Deputy Michael McNamara: What was on Deputy Martin’s desk? Deputy Micheál Martin: He had an extensive dossier prepared by planning officials in the Department following an internal review of complaints made from 2007 to 2009. He had a 1 Leaders’ 28 March 2012. Questions [Deputy Micheál Martin.] series of reports from the managers in each of the local authorities submitted in response to a formal request from the Minister using his statutory powers under the planning and develop- ment Acts. He had terms of reference for a panel of planning consultants to carry out indepen- dent reviews in the six local authorities. He had a completed tender process to select the panel of consultants and he had letters of appointment ready to be issued to the members of the panel. On the basis of the dossiers presented to him he was convinced that these matters required an independent review of planning. An Ceann Comhairle: A question, please. Deputy Micheál Martin: Given the debate going on in the House this week everyone seems to be agreed that the planning process has to be above reproach. There are significant reasons the former Minister, Mr. Gormley, proceeded with these inquiries. An Ceann Comhairle: A question, please. (Interruptions). Deputy Micheál Martin: Frankly, questions need to be answered about why an independent review was suppressed by the incoming Government. It is a serious issue that demands a serious response from the Government. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan: What took place for the past 20 years was serious too. Deputy Micheál Martin: Why were the independent reviews established by Mr. Gormley suppressed? (Interruptions). An Ceann Comhairle: Excuse me. The Tánaiste is perfectly capable of answering the question without assistance. The Tánaiste: Thank you, a Cheann Comhairle. An Ceann Comhairle: Can we please allow him to answer a question? I have worked with him long enough and I have every confidence in him. Deputy Michael McNamara: He has no difficulty answering questions. The Tánaiste: I am greatly reassured by the Ceann Comhairle’s confidence. I welcome Deputy Martin’s interest in probity in the planning system. The former Minister for the Envir- onment, Heritage and Local Government, Mr. Gormley, announced independent inquiries into seven local authorities in June 2010. When he left office more than seven months later, he had still not commenced these. A Deputy: Do not be surprised. Deputy Brendan Howlin: He did not read that file. The Tánaiste: The new Minister considered that the considerable cost of retaining consultants to conduct these inquiries required further examination. He instructed officials to conduct an internal review and to report to him on what further actions might be warranted. These further actions might include changes to legislation, new regulations or further guidance on a range of issues related to the operation of the planning system in the local authorities. However, the 2 Leaders’ 28 March 2012. Questions findings of the internal review were not to be prejudged and it was always the case that some further investigations, including independent inquiries as originally announced, might form part of these outcomes. This remains the position today. The review will be completed following the publication of the retail planning guidelines due before the end of April. The Minister has committed to issuing a public statement outlining in full the complaints at issue, the response and any appropriate actions to be pursued in regard to further policy development and guid- ance in line with the commitments in the programme for Government and the relevant recom- mendations in the report of the Mahon tribunal. Deputy Martin should note that no planning inquiry is being suppressed. The reviews are being conducted in the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government. When that process is completed following the publication of the retail planning guidelines at the end of April a full public statement will be made. This will set out in full the complaints made, the action taken in the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Govern- ment to review and examine those complaints and what further action might need to be taken arising from the review. Nothing is being suppressed. It is being looked at in the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government. The full information will be published. Deputy Micheál Martin: That is completely disingenuous. Deputy Emmet Stagg: Mirror, mirror on the wall. Deputy Micheál Martin: It is important to point out that an internal review of these com- plaints has already been carried out. Deputy Tom Hayes: Was Deputy Martin afraid of it? Deputy Micheál Martin: The answer given this morning is a complete whitewash. As far back as 2009 the spatial planning section of the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government had carried out an internal review of planning practices in these counties. I illus- trate this with the comments of the former Louth county manager, Mr. Quinlivan, who carried out an investigation into matters in Carlow. An Ceann Comhairle: A supplementary question, please. Deputy Micheál Martin: I am asking a question. This is a serious issue. An Ceann Comhairle: I appreciate that but you have one minute. Deputy Micheál Martin: He stated that effective planning enforcement to ensure legislation was observed “was not in place” in Carlow. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan: What did Deputy Martin do about in when he was in government? Deputy Micheál Martin: It rendered the whole enforcement process questionable. Mr. Quinli- van recommended that “prolonged consultation with those who breached the planning system must not take place”. Complaints were received from many people, including members of the public, the Ombudsman, An Taisce and many other reputable bodies, about planning practices in these counties in recent years. (Interruptions). Deputy Niall Collins: Who controlled those local authorities? 3 Leaders’ 28 March 2012. Questions Deputy Micheál Martin: There is much heckling but I am not prejudging anything. Deputy Niall Collins: Government councillors control all those local authorities. An Ceann Comhairle: Please ask your question. Deputy Micheál Martin: I am not prejudging anything. I have no difficulty without fear or favour of having independent planning investigations. Why? An Ceann Comhairle: Ask your question. You are over time. Deputy Micheál Martin: I have spoken to the former Minister, Mr. Gormley. The bottom line is that there was resistance to these inquiries within the system. (Interruptions). Deputy Micheál Martin: There was internal resistance to these planning investigations. I asked questions yesterday evening including whether we are all satisfied that our planning processes are above reproach. I call on the Tánaiste to meet the former Minister, Mr. Gormley, and to look at the dossier himself. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan: Deputy Martin held meetings with him for long enough. Deputy Micheál Martin: He should look at the extensive material. He established an indepen- dent inquiry and a process but it was suppressed. It is completely dishonest to say that there should now be another
Recommended publications
  • Day 2: Descriptive Statistical Methods for Textual Analysis
    Day 2: Descriptive statistical methods for textual analysis Kenneth Benoit TCD 2016: Quantitative Text Analysis January 12, 2016 Basic descriptive summaries of text Readability statistics Use a combination of syllables and sentence length to indicate \readability" in terms of complexity Vocabulary diversity (At its simplest) involves measuring a type-to-token ratio (TTR) where unique words are types and the total words are tokens Word (relative) frequency Theme (relative) frequency Length in characters, words, lines, sentences, paragraphs, pages, sections, chapters, etc. Simple descriptive table about texts: Describe your data! Speaker Party Tokens Types Brian Cowen FF 5,842 1,466 Brian Lenihan FF 7,737 1,644 Ciaran Cuffe Green 1,141 421 John Gormley (Edited) Green 919 361 John Gormley (Full) Green 2,998 868 Eamon Ryan Green 1,513 481 Richard Bruton FG 4,043 947 Enda Kenny FG 3,863 1,055 Kieran ODonnell FG 2,054 609 Joan Burton LAB 5,728 1,471 Eamon Gilmore LAB 3,780 1,082 Michael Higgins LAB 1,139 437 Ruairi Quinn LAB 1,182 413 Arthur Morgan SF 6,448 1,452 Caoimhghin O'Caolain SF 3,629 1,035 All Texts 49,019 4,840 Min 919 361 Max 7,737 1,644 Median 3,704 991 Hapaxes with Gormley Edited 67 Hapaxes with Gormley Full Speech 69 Lexical Diversity I Basic measure is the TTR: Type-to-Token ratio I Problem: This is very sensitive to overall document length, as shorter texts may exhibit fewer word repetitions I Special problem: length may relate to the introdution of additional subjects, which will also increase richness Lexical Diversity: Alternatives to TTRs total types TTR total tokens Guiraud ptotal types total tokens D (Malvern et al 2004) Randomly sample a fixed number of tokens and count those MTLD the mean length of sequential word strings in a text that maintain a given TTR value (McCarthy and Jarvis, 2010) { fixes the TTR at 0.72 and counts the length of the text required to achieve it 194 C.
    [Show full text]
  • A Question of Political Will: Corruption and Public Administration in Ireland Di Gary Murphy, Robert Gillanders E Michael Breen
    A question of political will: Corruption and Public Administration in Ireland di Gary Murphy, Robert Gillanders e Michael Breen Abstract: A question of political will: Corruption and Public Administration in Ireland – The paper provides the reader with a transversal analysis of the issue of corruption in Ireland – including the Irish legislation against corruption and the economical shortcomings of corruption. Keywords: Ireland; Transparency; Corruption; Public administration. 1. Introduction At the end of May 2018 the Irish parliament (Oireachtas) passed all stages of the Criminal Justice (Corruption Offences) Bill of 2017. The original bill was introduced in November 2017 by the Minister for Justice and Equality, Charles Flanagan, as the final piece in a range of acts entitled to ensure that Irish politics and public life was clean. The purpose of the bill was to completely modernise Irish anti-corruption laws and make them more accessible to the general public. The Criminal Justice (Corruption Offences) Act 2018 repealed and replaced seven previous Prevention of Corruption Acts dating from 1889 to 2010. The 2018 act was, however, far more than a simple consolidation of the old law. Rather it was a robust and innovative piece of legislation that provided for a number of new offences as well as stronger penalties for those convicted of corruption. The Act followed a range of open government initiatives such as the Freedom of Information Act 2014, the Protected Disclosures Act 2014, and the Regulation of Lobbying Act 2015. In that context the Act enabled the Irish state to meet with some of its international obligations as well as significantly strengthening its legislative defences against white collar crime and corruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Da´Il E´Ireann
    Vol. 669 Thursday, No. 4 4 December 2008 DI´OSPO´ IREACHTAI´ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DA´ IL E´ IREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIU´ IL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Thursday, 4 December 2008. Requests to move Adjournment of Da´il under Standing Order 32 ……………… 713 Order of Business ……………………………… 713 Planning and Development (Enforcement Proceedings) Bill 2008: First Stage ………… 728 Criminal Justice (Drug Trafficking) Act 1996: Motion ………………… 728 Finance (No. 2) Bill 2008: Allocation of Time Motion ………………………… 728 Financial Resolutions …………………………… 729 Social Weflare (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2008: Report Stage (resumed) and Final Stages … … 732 Ceisteanna—Questions Minister for Education and Science Priority Questions …………………………… 780 Other Questions …………………………… 791 Adjournment Debate Matters …………………………… 797 Messages from Select Committees ………………………… 797 Estimates for Public Services 2008: Message from Select Committee …………… 797 Adjournment Debate Financial Services Regulation ………………………… 797 Social Welfare Benefits …………………………… 800 School Accommodation …………………………… 802 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 805 DA´ IL E´ IREANN ———— De´ardaoin, 4 Nollaig 2008. Thursday, 4 December 2008. ———— Chuaigh an Leas-Cheann Comhairle i gceannas ar 10.30 a.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Requests to move Adjournment of Da´il under Standing Order 32. An Leas-Cheann Comhairle: Before coming to the Order of Business, I propose to deal with a number of notices under Standing Order 32. I will call the Deputies in the order in which their notices were submitted to my office. Deputy Finian McGrath: I seek the adjournment of the Da´il under Standing Order 32 to debate the following urgent matter of national importance, namely, the recent information that members of the British National Party are living and operating in this country, particularly in Santry, Sligo, Galway and Kerry;—— A Deputy: They are looking for European seats here.
    [Show full text]
  • Carrickmines Chapter 19
    The Final Report of the Tribunal of Inquiry into Certain Planning Matters and Payments Vol. V (The Carrickmines Module) 2 Page | iv TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER NINETEEN – Carrickmines Module…………………………........... 1 Part 1 The delay in publication of this chapter ………………………………. 1 The reasons for the Inquiry …………………………………...………… 1 The phases of the Inquiry…………………………………...………….. 2 The background to the Inquiry…………………………………………. 4 The O’Halloran Consortium lands…………………………...………… 5 The PW/JW lands………………………………….................………… 6 Part 2 The source of funds used to purchase the Tracey lands ..…………. 6 Part 3 The relationship between Mr George Redmond and Mr Jim Kennedy ………………………………………………………… 8 General relationship……………………………………………….……. 9 The County Council zoning map ………………………………..…....... 11 The Tribunal’s conclusions relating to the provision of the map to Mr Caldwell...............………………………......................17 Part 4 The relationship between the O’Halloran Consortium and the owners of the PP/JW lands pre 1991 ……………………………. 18 The joint residential scheme……………………………………………. 19 The joint rezoning submission …………………………………………. 19 Proposed purchase of the O’Halloran lands………………………….. 21 The Covenant Agreement and the Access Issue..……………………. 22 Mr Kilcoyne’s reservations concerning Mr Kennedy..……………….. 22 Part 5 Mr Frank Dunlop’s relationship with Paisley Park / Jackson Way (PP/JW) ………………………………………………….. 24 Mr Dunlop’s engagement by Mr Kennedy ..………………………….. 24 Mr Dunlop’s claimed first meeting with Mr Kennedy ….…………….. 28 Mr Dunlop’s and Mr Kennedy’s understanding regarding payments to councillors …………………………………...…………… 29 Mr Dunlop’s success fee ..……………………………………………… 35 The Tribunal’s findings regarding Mr Dunlop’s engagement by PP/JW ……………...…………………………………………………. 37 Mr Dunlop’s lobbying activities for PP/JW.……………………………. 40 The Special Meeting of 24 May 1991………………………………….. 41 Mr Dunlop’s involvement in the period between the meeting of 24 May 1991 and that of 12 June 1992 and his liaisions with Mr Kennedy and Mr Caldwell……….………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Amicus Curiae of the Senate of the United Mexican States, Et
    No. 08-987 IN THE RUBEN CAMPA, RENE GONZALEZ, ANTONIO GUERRERO, GERARDO HERNANDEZ, AND LUIS MEDINA, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI ON BEHALF OF THE SENATE OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES, THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF PANAMA, MARY ROBINSON (UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, 1997- 2002; PRESIDENT OF IRELAND, 1992-1997) AND LEGISLATORS FROM THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNTRIES OF BRAZIL, BELGIUM, CHILE, GERMANY, IRELAND, JAPAN, MEXICO, SCOTLAND AND THE UNITED KINGDOM ______________ Michael Avery Counsel of Record Suffolk Law School 120 Tremont Street Boston, MA 02108 617-573-8551 ii AMICI CURIAE The Senate of the United Mexican States The National Assembly of Panama Mary Robinson (United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 1997-2002; President of Ireland, 1992-1997) Legislators from the European Parliament Josep Borrell Fontelles, former President Enrique Barón Crespo, former President Miguel Ángel Martínez, Vice-President Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Vice-President Luisa Morgantini, Vice-President Mia De Vits, Quaestor Jo Leinen, Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs Richard Howitt, Vice-Chair of the Subcommittee on Human Rights Guisto Catania, Vice-Chair of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Willy Meyer Pleite, Vice-Chair of the Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly Edite Estrela, Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy and Media Coverage of the European Economic Crisis
    ‘Austerity as a policy harms the many and benefits the few. In a democracy that’s sup- posed to be hard to sell. Yet the democracies most effected by the European financial crisis saw no such democratic revolt. Mercille tells us why. Updating and deploying the Chomsky-Herman propaganda model of the media in a systematic and empirical way, he shows us how alternative policies are sidelined and elite interests are protected’. Mark Blyth, Professor of International Political Economy, Brown University ‘This is one of the most important political economy books of the year. Julien Mercille’s book is set to become the definitive account of the media’s role in Ireland’s spectacular and transformative economic boom and bust. He argues convincingly that critical poli- tical economic perspectives are a rarity in the Irish media and Mercille’s devastating critique painstakingly chronicles the persistent failures of the Irish media’. Dr. Tom McDonnell, Macroeconomist at the Nevin Economic Research Institute (NERI) ‘The European economies remain trapped in high levels of unemployment while more austerity is promoted as the solution. Yet the media plays a key role in presenting these austerity policies as though “there is no alternative”. This book, with a focus on Ireland, provides compelling evidence on the ideological role of the media in the presentation of the policies favoring the economic, financial and political elites. A highly recommended read for its analyses of the crises and of the neo-liberal interpretation from the media’. Malcolm Sawyer, Emeritus Professor of Economics, University of Leeds ‘The basic story of the economic crisis is simple.
    [Show full text]
  • Lib News Planned October 07:Lib News Planned Dec 06 01/10/2007 13:54 Page 3
    Lib News planned October 07:Lib News planned Dec 06 01/10/2007 13:54 Page 3 Issued by An Chomhairle Leabharlanna (The Library Council) No. 275 October 2007 ISSN 0332-0049 NATIONAL RECREATION POLICY FOR This month in pictures YOUNG PEOPLE Teenspace – the National Recreation Policy for Young People was developed by the Office of the Minister for Children in response to concerns raised by teenagers and parents. In the consultations conducted throughout the country in the development of the National Childrenʼs Strategy (2000), the need for improved play and recreation facilities was the single biggest concern cited by p.1-2 children and young people. The report based on the research, was launched by the Minister for Children, Brendan Smith TD, at Larkin Community College on September 10 2007. Teenspace recognises that young people donʼt always want to participate in structured activities and that hanging out is a valid and important aspect of teenage life. ʻTeenspace promotes new initiatives and the need for interagency co-operation but also outlines a strategic approach to existing investmentʼ said the Minister. ʻTo invest wisely in the future, we need to involve young people in helping us to plan and design the facilities, which are most relevant to themʼ he added. Liz Canavan, Principal Officer in the Office of the Minister for Children, said: p.2 ʻitʼs fantastic to see the kinds of recreational innovations which are already happening and seem to be hitting the mark with young people. We need to mainstream these projects and foster more interagency collaboration by the way we invest in the futureʼ.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey: English
    The Economic and Social Research Institute 4 Burlington Road Dublin 4 Ph. 6671525 IRISH ELECTION SURVEY, SUMMER 2002 Interviewer’s Name ____________________ Interviewer’s Number Constituency Code Area Code Respondent Code Date of Interview: Day Month Time Interview Began (24hr clock) Introduction (Ask for named respondent) Good morning/afternoon/evening. I am from the Economic and Social Research Institute in Dublin. We have been commissioned by a team of researchers from Trinity College Dublin and University College Dublin to carry out a survey into the way people voted in the recent general election. You have been selected at random from the Electoral Register to participate in the survey. The interview will take about 60 minutes to complete and all information provided will be treated in the strictest confidence by the Economic and Social Research Institute. It will not be possible for anyone to identify your individual views or attitudes from the analysis undertaken on the data. __________________________________________________________________________________ SECTION A A1 First, I’d like to ask you a general question. What do you think has been the single most important issue facing Ireland over the last five years? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ A2 How good or bad a job do you think the Fianna Fail/Progressive Democrat government did over the past five years in terms of _______________________ [the Main issue mentioned at A1 above]. Did they do a: Very Good Job......... 1 Good Job ......... 2 Bad Job ..... 3 Very Bad Job…… 4 Don’t know ..... 5 A3.1a Looking back on the recent general election campaign in May of this year, could you tell me if a candidate called to your home? Yes ......
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 11, 2009
    Technological University Dublin ARROW@TU Dublin Issues Irish Communications Review 2009-01-01 Volume 11, 2009 Ellen Hazelkorn Technological University Dublin, [email protected] Nora French Technological University Dublin Wolfgang Truetzschler Technological University Dublin Follow this and additional works at: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/jouicriss Part of the Mass Communication Commons Recommended Citation Dublin Institute of Technology : Irish communications review, Volume 11, 2009. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Irish Communications Review at ARROW@TU Dublin. It has been accepted for inclusion in Issues by an authorized administrator of ARROW@TU Dublin. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License IRISH COMMUNICATIONS REVIEW Vol Articles Representations of the Knowledge Economy: Irish Newspapers’ Discourses on a Key Policy Idea Brian Trench Whose Development? Framing of Ireland’s Aid Commitments by Institutional Sources and the Media During and After the Celtic Tiger Cliona Barnes, Anthony Cawley Media Discourses on Autonomy in Dying and Death Christina Quinlan The Irish Punditocracy as Contrarian Voice: Opinion Coverage of the Workplace Smoking Ban Declan Fahy Significant Television: Journalism, Sex Abuse and the Catholic Church in Ireland Colum Kenny Suing the Pope and Scandalising the People: Irish Attitudes to Sexual Abuse by Clergy Pre- and Post-Screening of a Critical Documentary Michael J. Breen, Hannah McGee, Ciaran O’Boyle, Helen Goode, Eoin Devereux Run out of the Gallery: The Changing Nature of Irish Political Journalism Kevin Rafter Hollywood Representations of Irish Journalism: A Case Study of Veronica Guerin Pat Brereton Infringement Nation: Morality, Technology and Intellectual Property Eadaoin O’Sullivan Reviews Eoin Devereux Understanding the Media .
    [Show full text]
  • Fianna Fáil: Past and Present
    Fianna Fáil: Past and Present Alan Byrne Fianna Fáil were the dominant political prompted what is usually referred to as party in Ireland from their first term in gov- a civil-war but as Kieran Allen argues in ernment in the 1930s up until their disas- an earlier issue of this journal, the Free trous 2011 election. The party managed to State in effect mounted a successful counter- enjoy large support from the working class, revolution which was thoroughly opposed to as well as court close links with the rich- the working class movement.3 The defeat est people in Irish society. Often described signalled the end of the aspirations of the as more of a ‘national movement’ than a Irish revolution and the stagnation of the party, their popular support base has now state economically. Emigration was par- plummeted. As this article goes to print, ticularly high in this period, and the state the party (officially in opposition but en- was thoroughly conservative. The Catholic abling a Fine Gael government) is polling Church fostered strong links with Cumann at 26% approval.1 How did a party which na nGaedheal, often denouncing republicans emerged from the losing side of the civil war in its sermons. come to dominate Irish political life so thor- There were distinctive class elements to oughly? This article aims to trace the his- both the pro and anti-treaty sides. The tory of the party, analyse their unique brand Cumann na nGaedheal government drew its of populist politics as well as their relation- base from large farmers, who could rely on ship with Irish capitalism and the working exports to Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Colleen Anne Hynes 2007
    Copyright by Colleen Anne Hynes 2007 The Dissertation Committee for Colleen Anne Hynes certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: “Strangers in the House”: Twentieth Century Revisions of Irish Literary and Cultural Identity Committee: Elizabeth Butler Cullingford, Supervisor Barbara Harlow, Co-Supervisor Kamran Ali Ann Cvetkovich Ian Hancock “Strangers in the House”: Twentieth Century Revisions of Irish Literary and Cultural Identity by Colleen Anne Hynes, B.S.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2007 Acknowledgements This dissertation project would not have been possible with the support, wisdom and intellectual generosity of my dissertation committee. My two supervisors, Elizabeth Butler Cullingford and Barbara Harlow, introduced me to much of the literature and many of the ideas that make up this project. Their direction throughout the process was invaluable: they have been, and continue to be, inspirational teachers, scholars and individuals. Kamran Ali brought both academic rigor and a sense of humor to the defense as he pushed the manuscript beyond its boundaries. Ann Cvetkovich translated her fresh perspective into comments on new directions for the project and Ian Hancock was constantly generous with his resources and unique knowledge of the Irish Traveller community. Thanks too to my graduate school colleagues, who provided constructive feedback and moral support at every step, and who introduced me to academic areas outside of my own, especially Miriam Murtuza, Miriam Schacht, Veronica House, George Waddington, Neelum Wadhwani, Lynn Makau, Jeanette Herman, Ellen Crowell and Lee Rumbarger.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunday Times/Behaviour & Attitudes Opinion Poll Series Presidential
    Sunday Times /Behaviour & Attitudes Opinion Poll 16th – 18th October 2011 Prepared for Prepared by Ian McShane J.3221 Technical Appendix Technical Appendix The results of this opinion poll are based upon a representative sample of 1,029 eligible Irish voters aged 18 years +. As such, the results can be deemed to be accurate to within plus or minus 3.2 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. Fieldwork was conducted over the period 16th – 18th October 2011, with interviewing carried out at the Behaviour & Attitudes Computer Aided Telephone Interviewing (CATI) Unit at Milltown House in Dublin. Interviewing was conducted across all 43 constituencies in the country with households selected for interview by way of Random Digit Dialling (RDD). The sample is split across RDD landline numbers and RDD mobile telephone numbers, so as to ensure that individuals living in landline only households, mobile only households, and households with both a landline and mobile telephone are represented in their correct proportions. 3 Technical Appendix The subsequent survey results are weighted to reflect the known demographic profile of Irish adults, utilising the most recently published census population estimates from the Central Statistics Office (CSO). All aspects of the survey are conducted in accordance with the technical and ethical guidelines set down by the Association of Irish Market Research Organisations (AIMRO) and the European Society of Opinion & Market Research (ESOMAR). 4 Charted Summary Sunday Times/Behaviour & Attitudes Government
    [Show full text]