DOCSLIB.ORG

The Hon Malcolm Turnbull Prime Minister Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Hon Malcolm Turnbull Prime Minister Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 The Hon Malcolm Turnbull Prime Minister Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Cc: Senator The Hon Stephen Parry President of the Senate Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 16 February, 2016 Concerns in Relation to a Plebiscite on Marriage Dear Prime Minister, We, the undersigned faith leaders, urge you not to proceed with a plebiscite on the issue of allowing same-sex couples to marry. We believe such a plebiscite would be damaging to faith communities, the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) community, and the broader community. We believe a plebiscite has the potential to, . polarise faith communities over a highly politicised moral debate . silence and threaten LGBTI people of faith . discredit the voice of faith communities more generally on public matters . provide a platform for disparaging LGBTI Australians and their families, leading to increased incidences of anxiety, depression and suicide . severely damage relations between LGBTI and faith communities . not resolve the issue because plebiscites offer no binding or agreed outcome Division Among Faith Communities Polls have demonstrated that opinion on legalising same-sex marriage varies among people of faith. In fact most polls find that a majority favour change. Yet the negative case will be put by religious groups and leaders who claim to speak on behalf of people of faith generally, or religious institutions as a whole. The tensions this poses for faith communities are exacerbated because significant, open dialogue around LGBTI issues is often yet to occur. A volatile, public and politically-charged debate could both distance leaders from lay people, marginalise faith communities from broader society and alienate LGBTI individuals within religious communities. De-stablisation of Religion in Society In a secular society divorce, re-marriage and de facto relationships have long since been recognised in law. Various faith groups disagree theologically with these, but widely support the in-principle separation of law from confessional beliefs. By uniting a confessional doctrine (on marriage) to a specific public policy, a plebiscite threatens to undo the social consensus central to Australia’s secular-religious harmony. This poses the knock-on effect of undermining the wider contribution faith communities can make to other public matters. We also want to avoid any public perception that the resources available to faith communities for important charity and welfare work would be expended instead on a plebiscite campaign. Detrimental Effects on LGBTI Australians All sides disavow causing harm to LGBTI Australians. Nonetheless, there are grave worries about what harms a plebiscite could deliver. Such concerns cannot be put down to exaggerated imagination. High profile proponents of ‘traditional’ marriage have a track record of public statements that have been widely interpreted as disparaging LGBTI people. This includes linking same-sex relationships with odious moral behaviours such as incest and bestiality; with negative health outcomes, such as smoking and sexually transmitted diseases; and with charges that children in same-sex households suffer parental loss and a breach of their human rights. After decades of legalised discrimination, and ongoing social stigma, LGBTI Australians will face an angry, drawn-out debate, one likely to multiply existing disadvantages and stigma. The Uncertainty of a Plebiscite Some law-makers who oppose legalising same-sex marriage have stated that even if a plebiscite result was in favour of change they would not vote accordingly. This highlights that a plebiscite will not be binding and that marriage equality can only be resolved by a vote in parliament. A plebiscite creates serious risks of polarisation within faith communities, societal divisiveness and harm to vulnerable minorities. Yet the process itself lacks consensus and offers no guarantee that it will progress, or finalize, this debate. We ask that, instead of holding a plebiscite, you allow marriage equality to be resolved by a vote in parliament as soon as possible. Yours Sincerely, The Undersigned Faith Leaders Rev'd Jean Shannon Chaplain, Canberra, ACT Rev'd Ben Gilmour Superintendent Minister, Paddington Uniting Church, NSW Rev’d Dr John Squires Minister, Wauchope Uniting Church, NSW Rev’d Robert Clark Pastor, MCC Good Shepherd, Granville, NSW The Venerable Rod Bower Archdeacon, Gosford Anglican Church, NSW Rev’d Greg Smith Pastor, Metropolitan Community Church, Sydney, NSW Rev’d Clive H. Norton Priest, St Basil's Anglican Church, Artarmon, NSW Rev'd Laurie McIntyre Minister (Canon Emeritus), Bowen Mountain, NSW The Venerable Peter MacLeod-Miller Archdeacon, St Matthew's Anglican Church Albury, NSW Gregg Heathcote Shin Buddhist Priest, Newcastle, NSW Rev’d Bill Crews AM CEO & Founder Exodos Foundation, NSW Rev’d Janet Dawson Minister, Uniting Church NSW Rev’d Michael Palmer Rector, St Michael's Anglican Church, Vaucluse, NSW Rev’d Dr Keith Mascord Benjamin Oh Co-convenor, Rainbow Catholics InterAgency for Ministry, NSW Honorary Curate, Holy Trinity Dulwich Hill, NSW Father David Smith Rector, Holy Trinity Dulwich Hill, NSW Rev’d Graham Long AM CEO & Pastor, The Wayside Chapel, Sydney, NSW Rev’d Dr Margaret Mayman Minister, Pitt Street Uniting Church, NSW Rev’d Clare Brockett Minister, Uniting Church, Sydney, NSW Rev’d Dr Leigh Neighbour Pastor, Metropolitan Community Church, Brisbane, QLD Rev’d Penelope Jones Priest St Luke's Toowoomba, QLD Rev’d Dr Ray Barraclough Secretary, A Progressive Christian Voice Australia, QLD Rev’d Susan Pickering Minister, West End Uniting Church, Brisbane, QLD Rev’d Dr Noel Preston Minister, Uniting Church in Australia , QLD Rev’d Colin Gurteen Rev'd Canon John Fowler Minister, Anglican Diocese of Willochra, SA Minister, Kingston Uniting Church, TAS Rev’d Damien Stevens Co-Convenor, Uniting Network, Shepparton, VIC Rev’d David Connolly Vicar, St Stephen's Anglican Church, Richmond, VIC Prof Emeritus Rev’d Gary Bouma Minister, St John's Anglican Church, East Malvern, VIC Rev’d Angus McLeay Minister, Anglican Diocese of Melbourne, VIC Rev’d Noel Whale Priest, Holy Trinity Port Melbourne, VIC Rev’d Matt Glover Counsellor, Ringwood, VIC Rev’d Nathan Nettleton Pastor, South Yarra Community Baptist Church, VIC Rev’d Peter Weeks Minister, Craigieburn & Wallan Uniting Church, VIC Rev’d Dr Paul Tonson Minister, Uniting Church Minister, VIC Rev’d Dr Avril Hannah-Jones Minister, Williamstown Uniting Church, VIC Dr Muriel Porter Anglican Lay Leader, Diocese of Melbourne, VIC Father David Moore Vicar, St John's Anglican Church, Camberwell, VIC Rev’d Cath McKinney Minister, University of Divinity, Melbourne, VIC Canon Dr Colleen O’Reilly Vicar, St George’s Anglican Church, VIC Rev’d Michelle Trebilcock Minister, St John’s Anglican Church, Camberwell, VIC Rev’d Carolyn Francis Minister, Collins Street Baptist, VIC Rev’d Tony Murray-Fiest Chaplain, Anglican Church Perth, WA .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Whether Religious Speech Is Political Speech Sex Couples
    ARTICLES VOICES IN THE POLITICAL WILDERNESS Women in the Sydney Anglican Diocese MITCHELL LANDRIGAN he Sydney Anglican Diocese neither ordains religious discourse might also be political discourse. It women as parish rectors (priests) nor considers whether church policies preventing women’s consecrates women as bishops. While ordination (or, more precisely, the exceptions in the appointment to these positions allows male clergy NSW anti-discrimination legislation that support the Tto lead a church parish or other church community, Sydney Anglican Diocese’s bans) may constitute an senior clergy may be voices in political discourse — for unwarranted political constraint. example, on topics such as abortion, euthanasia, religious tolerance legislation and marriage of same- Whether religious speech is political speech sex couples. By preventing women from rising to REFERENCES What is the difference between political and religious I. The International Leader of the Salvation positions from which they may contribute to such speech and how (if at all) is it possible to distinguish the Army, the General, may be a man or a political debates, the Sydney Anglican Diocese’s bans two forms of expression such as might be relevant in a woman: see The Salvation Army — About on ordaining women as rectors or consecrating them Us <salvationarmysouth.org/about. political sense to bans on women’s ordination as priests htm#doctrines> at 2 May 2009. See also as bishops may constrain women’s political speech. or their consecration as bishops? This article considers whether NSW anti-discrimination Andrew Eason, Gender and Equality in the As will be seen, it can be difficult to distinguish Early Salvation Army (2003).
    [Show full text]
  • 1The New Scapegoats Cover
    THE NEW SCAPEGOATS The clergy victims of the Anglican Church sexual abuse crisis Muriel Porter M orning Star PubliS hing Published in Australia by Morning Star Publishing P. O. Box 51 Northcote Vic. 3070 Australia ISBN 9780987619358 Copyright © Muriel Porter 2017 All rights reserved. Other than for the purposes and subject to the conditions prescribed under the Copyright Act, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. First published 2017 Cataloguing-in-Publication entry is available from the National Library of Australia http:/catalogue.nla.gov.au/. Printed in Australia Contents Chapter One Introduction . 5 Chapter Two Te Background . .15 Chapter Three: Te Scapegoat Bishop . .27 Chapter Four: Te New Puritanism. .39 Chapter Five An Avenger’s Charter . .49 Chapter Six: Te Church of England - A comparison. .53 Chapter Seven: Teological Refection. .59 Chapter Eight: Conclusion . .75 Chapter One: Introduction Chapter One Introduction As the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse1 hearings have made abundantly clear, the Christian churches in Australia scapegoated the victims of clergy abuse for decades in an attempt to protect their reputation. Tat was at best deluded, and at worst evil. Te Anglican Church was fully complicit in this appalling behaviour. Abusive clergy were quietly moved from parish to parish, school to school, diocese to diocese, and sometimes overseas. Others were secretly sacked. Criminal activity was not reported to the police and parents were kept in the dark.
    [Show full text]
  • Enriching Pastoral Couplesâ•Ž Marriages in the Seventh-Day
    Please HONOR the copyright of these documents by not retransmitting or making any additional copies in any form (Except for private personal use). We appreciate your respectful cooperation. ___________________________ Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN) P.O. Box 30183 Portland, Oregon 97294 USA Website: www.tren.com E-mail: [email protected] Phone# 1-800-334-8736 ___________________________ ATTENTION CATALOGING LIBRARIANS TREN ID# Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) MARC Record # Digital Object Identification DOI # Dissertation Approval Sheet This dissertation entitled ENRICHING PASTORAL COUPLES’ MARRIAGES IN THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH IN AUSTRALIA Written by TRAFFORD ARTHUR FISCHER and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Ministry has been accepted by the Faculty of Fuller Theological Seminary upon the recommendation of the undersigned reader: _____________________________________ Bryan Craig _____________________________________ Kurt Fredrickson Date Received: September 2, 2014 ENRICHING PASTORAL COUPLES’ MARRIAGES IN THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH IN AUSTRALIA A MINISTRY FOCUS PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE DOCTOR OF MINISTRY BY TRAFFORD ARTHUR FISCHER AUGUST 2014 ABSTRACT Strengthening Pastoral Marriages in the Seventh-day Adventist Church in Australia Trafford A Fischer Doctor of Ministry School of Theology, Fuller Theological Seminary 2014 The goal of this study was to outline how pastoral couples in the Seventh-day Adventist Church in Australia might strengthen their marriages. This is deemed to be an imperative considering the pain and loss of a broken marriage, and in particular a pastor’s marriage. It is argued that this endeavour will find a greater chance of success when the pastoral couple’s commitment to marital enrichment is supported by the Seventh-day Adventist Church administration and the church members.
    [Show full text]
  • Pastoral Responses to Sexual Abuse
    Sexual abuse: sin, guilt and shame in the context of pastoral care in the parish Muriel Porter Reliable surveys suggest that between 20 and 30 per cent of women have been sexually abused before the age of sixteen. These figures do not include those women abused in later teenage years or adult life, or adult women who have been the victims of domestic violence or sexual harassment. About 10 per cent of men have been sexually abused in childhood.1 It is clear from these statistics that a significant proportion of any adult worshipping congregation has suffered some form of sexual abuse at some stage in their lives. The Church’s concern for the survivors of sexual abuse, then, is much greater than its responsibility for those who were abused by clergy or church workers; the reality is that the most serious abuse and sexual violence has usually been at the hands of fathers, step-fathers or other relatives or close family friends. Those abused by clergy and other church workers are a relatively small proportion of the total of abused people who sit in church pews Sunday by Sunday. The specific spiritual, theological and pastoral needs of all abused people have been largely overlooked, largely through ignorance both of those needs and of the important theological debate over the nature of sin, shame and guilt of the past fifty years. The recent sexual abuse crisis in the churches has alerted church leaders at all levels to the gravity of sexual abuse. Until only a decade or so ago, episodes of sexual abuse committed by clergy or church workers were usually regarded by their superiors as little more than regrettable isolated misdemeanours.
    [Show full text]
  • Graving Another Testament: a Critical Discourse Analysis of the Sydney Anglicans Under Peter Jensen 2001-2013
    Fall 08 Graving Another Testament: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Sydney Anglicans Under Peter Jensen 2001-2013 By Jonathan Foye A thesis presented to the School of Humanities and Communication Arts at Western Sydney University in fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 2016 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 4 ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 CHAPTER ONE: THE JENSEN ASCENSION ..................................................................................................... 45 CHAPTER TWO: THE POWERHOUSE—MOORE COLLEGE AND SYDNEY ANGLICAN DISCOURSE ... 65 CHAPTER THREE: PRISCILLA AND AQUILA—COMPLEMENTARIANISM AND GENDER ISSUES ...... 83 CHAPTER FOUR: SYDNEY DIOCESE AND THE AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC SPHERE .................................. 112 CHAPTER FIVE: SYDNEY DIOCESE'S MEDIA RELATIONS ....................................................................... 139 CHAPTER SIX: CRITICIAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF PETER JENSEN'S INAUGURAL ADDRESS .... 156 CHAPTER SEVEN: THE JENSEN LEGACY ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Anglican Diocese of Melbourne Submission to the Victoria Royal Commission Into Family Violence
    SUBM.0173.001.0001 Anglican Diocese of Melbourne Submission to the Victoria Royal Commission into Family Violence May 2015 Ken Spackman Registrar & General Manager Business Services Email: Telephone: SUBM.0173.001.0002 AUTHOR The submission has been prepared by Dr Ree Boddé, Program Director, Anglicans Helping to Prevent Violence against Women, Anglican Diocese of Melbourne. CONTRIBUTORS The Anglican Diocese of Melbourne is very grateful for the contributions of the following people: Sheila Bayard - President, National Council of Women, Victoria Dr Philip Bliss - Vice Chair, Council for Christians and Jews, Victoria Pastor Graeme Cann - Member of the Casey Pastor’s Network Rev Soma Chaplain - Priest-in-Charge, Anglican Parish of Footscray Victoria Cooke - Family and Domestic Violence Services Consultant, Anglicare WA Rev Jennifer Furphy - Vicar, Anglican Parish of Flinders/Balnarring John Hendry - Director of Student Welfare, Geelong Grammar School Noelene Horton - Executive Officer to the Archbishop Beth Hookey - Member of Mothers Union, Melbourne Rev Scott Holmes - Healthy Work Places Senior Advisor, YMCA Victoria Archdeacon Emeritus Philip Newman Dr Muriel Porter - Australian Journalist Claire Sargent - Independent Director of Professional Standards Archdeacon Allan Nichols - Former Multicultural Ministries Co-ordinator Simon Payne - Acting Head of Delivery, Church of England National Safeguarding Team Rev Helen Philips - Vicar, St Dunstan’s Anglican Church Rev Dr Gordon Preece - Chair Anglican Social Responsibilities Committee Ian Smith - Executive Officer for the Victorian Council of Churches SUBM.0173.001.0003 ABBREVIATIONS ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics ADoM Anglican Diocese of Melbourne AIHW Australian Institute of Health and Welfare NCRVAWC National Council to Reduce Violence against Women and Children VICHEALTH Victorian Health Promotion Foundation WHO World Health Organisation SUBM.0173.001.0004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Formal responses to family violence have generally been reactive rather than proactive.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Recent Events
    AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPER HISTORY GROUP NEWSLETTER ISSN 1443-4962 No. 25 December 2003 Compiled for the ANHG by Rod Kirkpatrick, 13 Sumac Street, Middle Park, Qld, 4074, 07-3279 2279, [email protected] 25.1 COPY DEADLINE AND WEBSITE ADDRESS Deadline for next Newsletter: 15 February 2004. Subscription details appear at end of Newsletter. [Number 1 appeared October 1999.] The Newsletter is online through the “Publications” link from the University of Queensland’s School of Journalism & Communication Website at www.uq.edu.au/journ-comm/ and through the ePrint Archives at the University of Queensland at http://eprint.uq.edu.au/), 25.2 SISTER ACT: BRISBANE BROADSHEET THINKS TABLOID Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd is watching the progress of the so-called “mini-Indy”, the tabloid version of London‟s broadsheet Independent, with a view to attempting a “mini-Mail”, a tabloid version of the Courier-Mail. The tabloid Indy exceeded expectations when it boosted overall sales of the Independent by 30,000 on its first day. It sold 42,000 copies of an 80,000 print run while sales of the broadsheet dipped 12,000. Queensland Newspapers managing director Jerry Harris believes the broadsheet/tabloid sister act could give the company the best of both worlds and act as a disincentive to Fairfax ambitions in the north. It could assist the company in some of the lower-circulation areas for the Courier-Mail, such as Brisbane‟s south-west and regional Queensland (David Nason, „Independent‟s tabloid turnaround gets Brisbane broadsheet thinking‟, Australian, Media liftout, 30 October 2003, p.3).
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Muriel Porter's Sydney Anglicans and the Reat to World
    A Review of Muriel Porter’s Sydney Anglicans and the reat to World Anglicanism: e Sydney Experiment. Mark ompson, Friday, 29 July 2011 _______________________________________________________________________________ Muriel Porter has been attacking Sydney Anglicans for years. In synods and committees and in print, she has vociferously opposed the position of the Diocese of Sydney on a whole range of issues. Never very far from the surface, though, is her anger at the diocese’s attitude towards women priests and bishops. She has campaigned on the other side of this debate with vigour for more than twenty-five years. She takes no prisoners and has been willing to use whatever means might be at her disposal to further her cause and, as even those who agree with her in principle have often recognised, to vilify those who, for whatever reason, disagree with her. In 2011 e New Puritans has been revised and brought up to date with a new title: Sydney Anglicans and the reat to World Anglicanism: e Sydney Experiment. As with the earlier volume, Muriel Porter acknowledges quite openly that she is ‘obviously not able to report on Sydney objectively and evenhandedly’ (xv). e acknowledgement was unnecessary. Even without it, the highly polemical nature of the book — and a significant degree of distortion that inevitably arises from that — is obvious. e book is littered with unsubstantiated assertions introduced with words such as ‘Some have suggested …’ (e.g. pp. 70, 107), ‘I suspect the real reason …’ (e.g. p. 71, 75) and ‘Perhaps …’ (e.g. p. 159) (e title of the book itself is a giveaway of course, but the final titles of books are sometimes the work of the publishers rather than the author.) Unfortunately, it is also littered with factual error, half-truth and the attribution of false or hidden motives to those with whom she disagrees.
    [Show full text]
  • 254 Muriel Porter There Are Two Bodies Which Have Come to Enjoy
    254 Book Reviews Muriel Porter Sydney Anglicans and the Threat to World Anglicanism (Farnham, Surrey; Bloomington, in: Ashgate, 2011), xvi + 173 pp. isbn 978-1-4049-2027-9 (pbk). £19.99. There are two bodies which have come to enjoy iconic status as representatives of the current divisions within world Anglicanism. On the liberal side there is The Episcopal Church in the United States and on the conservative side there is the Diocese of Sydney in Australia. For many conservative Anglicans the Diocese of Sydney is seen as the great bastion of orthodox, Evangelical Angli- canism. As they see it, it has remained faithful to the Bible and the traditions of the English Reformation and has played, and continues to play, a vital role in providing leadership and resources for other Evangelical Anglicans both in Australia and around the globe. For many liberal Anglicans, however, the Dio- cese of Sydney represents a narrow and sectarian version of Anglicanism and has been responsible for stirring up controversy and division in Australia and throughout the Anglican Communion. As the title of her book indicates, the Australian Anglican writer Muriel Por- ter takes the liberal side in this division of opinion. She sees Sydney Anglicans as a ‘threat to world Anglicanism’ and her book explains why she thinks this is the case. The book is a revised and expanded version of an earlier book en- titled The New Puritans: The Rise of Fundamentalism in the Anglican Church which was published in 2006 and it updates the story of Sydney Anglicanism and its wider influence to 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Marriage: a Concise History
    Christian Marriage: A Concise History Muriel Porter1 Then the Lord God said, ‘It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper as his partner’. Genesis 2:18 (NRSV) arriage, according to the second creation account, was estab- Mlished as an institution to give human beings the closest form of companionship.2 This second ‘creation blueprint’ has been more honoured in the breach than in the observance. Marriage has veered far from this original ideal throughout human history, and changed significantly many, many times up to the present. This ‘blueprint’ was not followed faithfully in the story of the Israelites, with the Old Testament recording few couples in a monogamous, let alone genuinely companionate, marriage. The 1 Dr Muriel Porter OAM is a Melbourne laywoman, author, journalist, and academic. She gained her doctorate in church history from the University of Melbourne. She is an honorary research fellow of the University of Divinity, and an adjunct lecturer at Trinity College Theological School, a college of the University of Divinity. 2 In the first account of creation (Gen 1: 26–28), humankind is created as both male and female together at the same time. That the humans in this account are commanded to ‘be fruitful and multiply’ can be read as giving procreation the reason for the different genders, but so too can the partnership of men and women commanded together not only to fill the earth but also to subdue it through their dominion over ‘every living thing that moves upon the earth’. 155 Marriage, Same-Sex Marriage and the Anglican Church of Australia patriarchs and most of the kings of Israel had multiple wives and concubines.
    [Show full text]
  • Muriel Porter OAM
    Dr Muriel Porter OAM 7 January 2017 Committee Secretary, Select Committee on the Exposure Draft of the Marriage Amendment (Same-Sex Marriage) Bill Department of the Senate PO Box 6100 Canberra ACT 2600 Submission to Select Committee on the Exposure Draft of the Marriage Amendment (Same-Sex Marriage) Bill I am a leading laywoman in the Anglican Church of Australia, a member of the church’s national General Synod (the supreme decision-making body) and of the Synod’s Standing Committee. I have served continuously in both these roles for the past 30 years. I am also a church historian by academic qualification (PhD, University of Melbourne), specialising in the history of marriage in the Christian Church. A journalist and author, I have published numerous articles and books in this area, including essays for the Anglican Church’s Doctrine Commission. I primarily address the first of the Committee’s terms of reference, (a), “the nature and effect of proposed exemptions for ministers of religion, marriage celebrants and religious bodies and organisations, the extent to which those exemptions prevent encroachment upon religious freedoms, and the Commonwealth Government’s justification for the proposed exemptions”. In particular, I refer to the Bill’s proposed detailed exemptions for ministers of religion and religious bodies and organisations. In summary, I believe they go beyond what is necessary to ensure protection of religious freedom, and could cause unnecessary offence. The current Marriage Act 1961, as amended, is explicit in not imposing an obligation on ministers of religion to solemnize any marriage (Division 2, section 47). This provision is used widely by Christian denominations in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Fully-Ordained-Meat-Pie' Problem: Women Church Workers and Leadership Under Australian Democracy
    The ‘Fully-ordained-meat-pie’ Problem: Women Church Workers and Leadership under Australian Democracy Anne O’Brien School of Humanities University of New South Wales [email protected] Abstract: In the first half of the twentieth century most Christian denominations, calling on biblical and traditional authority, excluded women from leadership roles that were equal with men. While women exercised leadership within separate organisations, the idea of ‘organisation’ had different and sometimes contradictory meanings for different denominations, and for volunteers and professionals. ‘Organisation’ could mean vulnerability to intervention and collective strength; openness to new ideas and chain of command. Despite being in organisations that were ultimately subject to male authority, most women in the church found various ways of appealing to, evading, detaching from and living with male authority, and there were some notably sustained expressions of independence. Keywords: church, ordination, organisation, missionaries, deaconesses, nuns, volunteers During debates on the ordination of women in the Anglican Church in the 1980s, the Reverend Ian Herring, vicar of Bundoora near Melbourne, argued that ‘ordaining a woman was analogous to ordaining a meat pie on the altar of God’.1 The phrase became memorialised in a minor way because in 1988 at one of the peaks of controversy, filmmaker Gillian Coote named a film she made about the Movement for the Ordination Women The Fully-ordained Meat-pie. The phrase is a useful entry point for thinking about women’s leadership in the church because it captures the character of the misogyny that sometimes erupted in discussion of women’s ordination at this time, both its nastiness and absurdity.
    [Show full text]