Rho Kinase-Dependent Apical Constriction Counteracts M-Phase Apical Expansion to Enable Mouse Neural Tube Closure Max B
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Cell Science (2019) 132, jcs230300. doi:10.1242/jcs.230300 RESEARCH ARTICLE Rho kinase-dependent apical constriction counteracts M-phase apical expansion to enable mouse neural tube closure Max B. Butler1,*, Nina E. Short1,*, Eirini Maniou1, Paula Alexandre1, Nicholas D. E. Greene1, Andrew J. Copp1 and Gabriel L. Galea1,2,‡ ABSTRACT presumptive organs. These forces may be generated non-cell- Cellular generation of mechanical forces required to close the autonomously, such as during osmotic swelling of the lumen of the presumptive spinal neural tube, the ‘posterior neuropore’ (PNP), closed neural tube, the embryonic precursor of the brain and spinal involves interkinetic nuclear migration (INM) and apical constriction. cord (Desmond and Jacobson, 1977). Morphogenetic forces are also Both processes change the apical surface area of neuroepithelial cells, cell-autonomously generated through conserved mechanisms that but how they are biomechanically integrated is unknown. Rho kinase alter the shape of cells and, collectively, tissues (Pearl et al., 2017). (Rock; herein referring to both ROCK1 and ROCK2) inhibition in mouse Probably the best studied force-generating mechanism is apical whole embryo culture progressively widens the PNP. PNP widening is constriction of epithelial cells, which requires recruitment of not caused by increased mechanical tension opposing closure, as non-muscle myosin motor proteins, such as myosin-II, onto the evidenced by diminished recoil following laser ablation. Rather, Rock apical F-actin cytoskeleton. Apical myosin recruitment is promoted inhibition diminishes neuroepithelial apical constriction, producing by the activity of Rho-associated kinase (Rock; herein referring to increased apical areas in neuroepithelial cells despite diminished both ROCK1 and ROCK2 for mammalian systems) (Das et al., tension. Neuroepithelial apices are also dynamically related to INM 2014; Mason et al., 2013; Sai et al., 2014). In Drosophila and progression, with the smallest dimensions achieved in cells positive for non-mammalian vertebrates, apical constriction proceeds in an the pan-M phase marker Rb phosphorylated at S780 (pRB-S780). asynchronous ratchet-like pulsatile manner, producing wedge- A brief (2 h) Rock inhibition selectively increases the apical area of shaped cells with narrowed apical and widened basolateral pRB-S780-positive cells, but not pre-anaphase cells positive for domains (Christodoulou and Skourides, 2015; Martin et al., phosphorylated histone 3 (pHH3+). Longer inhibition (8 h, more than 2009). When coordinated across an epithelium, this causes tissue one cell cycle) increases apical areas in pHH3+ cells, suggesting cell bending (Nishimura et al., 2012). cycle-dependent accumulation of cells with larger apical surfaces Although apical constriction has been extensively studied in during PNP widening. Consequently, arresting cell cycle progression columnar and cuboidal epithelia, its regulation and function in with hydroxyurea prevents PNP widening following Rock inhibition. highly complex pseudostratified epithelia, such as the mammalian Thus, Rock-dependent apical constriction compensates for the neuroepithelium, are comparatively understudied. Pseudostratified PNP-widening effects of INM to enable progression of closure. epithelia also undergo oscillatory nuclear migration as cells progress through the cell cycle, known as interkinetic nuclear migration This article has an associated First Person interview with the first (INM). Nuclear movement during INM is believed to proceed in authors of the paper. phases: active microtubule-dependent nuclear ascent towards the apical surface during G2 followed by actin-dependent cell rounding KEY WORDS: Rock, Posterior neuropore, Apical constriction, in M phase and ‘passive’ nuclear descent towards the basal Interkinetic nuclear migration, F-actin, Biomechanics surface during G1/S (Kosodo et al., 2011; Leung et al., 2011; Spear and Erickson, 2012). Progression of INM also influences the INTRODUCTION dimensions of the apical portion of a cell. During S phase, nuclei are Abnormalities in embryonic cellular biomechanics are increasingly basally located and the apical surface is small, mimicking apically recognised as underlying congenital structural malformations in constricted wedge-shaped cells, whereas nuclei are larger and organ systems, including the heart (Hoog et al., 2018), eye (Hosseini apically located during mitosis, presumably producing larger apical et al., 2014; Oltean et al., 2016), joints (Singh et al., 2018) and central surfaces (Guthrie et al., 1991; Nagele and Lee, 1979). nervous system (Galea et al., 2017, 2018). Mechanical forces must be Both INM and apical constriction occur in the pseudostratified generated to change the shape of embryonic structures into the neuroepithelium of the closing neural tube. Failure of neural tube closure causes severe congenital defects, such as spina bifida, in ∼ 1Developmental Biology and Cancer, UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, London 1:1000 births (Cavadino et al., 2016). Spina bifida arises due to WC1N 1EH, UK. 2Comparative Bioveterinary Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, failure of the open caudal segment of the neural tube, the posterior London NW1 0TU, UK. neuropore (PNP), to undergo the narrowing and shortening required *These authors contributed equally to this work for closure. PNP closure is fundamentally a biomechanical event ‡Author for correspondence ([email protected]) during which the flat neural plate elevates lateral neural folds that buckle at paired dorsolateral hinge points. The neural folds become G.L.G., 0000-0003-2515-1342 apposed medially, such that their tips meet at the dorsal midline This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution where they are then joined by cellular protrusions that ‘zipper’down License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. the length of the neuropore (Nikolopoulou et al., 2017). PNP narrowing through neural fold medial apposition involves both Received 29 January 2019; Accepted 30 May 2019 apical constriction and INM. Regional prolongation of S phase Journal of Cell Science 1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Journal of Cell Science (2019) 132, jcs230300. doi:10.1242/jcs.230300 in the neuroepithelium along the PNP midline results in the was significantly reduced caudal to this location (Fig. 1D). accumulation of wedge-shaped cells, bending the tissue at the Dorsolateral hinge points were still present in Rock-inhibited medial hinge point (McShane et al., 2015; Smith and Schoenwolf, embryos (Fig. 1E), as previously reported (Escuin et al., 2015). 1988). Unlike pulsatile apical constrictions, this hinge point is stable These morphometric studies reveal tissue shape changes caused by and persists at the tissue level throughout most of PNP closure 8 h of Rock inhibition, of which PNP widening is the most marked, (Shum and Copp, 1996). for which biomechanical mechanisms were further investigated. PNP closure can be expected to fail if its tissue structures are As previously reported (Escuin et al., 2015), Rock inhibition abnormal, if pro-closure cell-generated mechanical forces cannot diminished the selective localisation of F-actin in the apical exceed forces which oppose closure or if those forces are not neuroepithelium (Fig. S1). In addition, we specifically investigated transmitted in a coordinated manner across the PNP. We have recently two supracellular F-actin organisations present in the PNP (Galea reported two genetic mouse models in which excessive tissue tensions et al., 2017, 2018): long rostrocaudal cables along the neural folds opposing PNP closure predict failure of closure and development of (Fig. 2A) and mediolateral profiles identifiable in the apical spina bifida (Galea et al., 2017, 2018). Tissue tension was inferred neuroepithelium (Fig. 2C). Although rostrocaudal F-actin cables from physical incision or laser ablation experiments in which the most remained evident close to the zippering point, the proportion of the recently fused portion of the neural tube, the zippering point, was PNP not flanked by these cables was significantly greater in embryos disrupted and the resulting rapid deformation of the PNP quantified treated with 10 µM Y27632 for 8 h than those cultured in vehicle (Galea et al., 2017, 2018). These experiments also showed that the (Fig. 2A,B; also see Fig. 1A). Unexpectedly, mediolaterally oriented PNP is a biomechanically coupled structure thanks at least in part to supracellular F-actin profiles were still evident in the neuroepithelium supracellular actomyosin cables that run rostro-caudally along the tips of the open PNP of Rock-inhibited embryos (Fig. 2C). The average of the neural fold (Galea et al., 2017, 2018). Hence, ablation of the orientation of F-actin profiles in each PNP was not significantly PNP zippering point causes neuropore widening, which extends into different between vehicle and Rock-inhibited embryos (Fig. 2C,D). more posterior portions of the open region. The apical neuroepithelium also forms distinct supracellular F-actin enrichments (‘profiles’)that Rock inhibition diminishes PNP tissue tension are oriented mediolaterally, in the direction of neural fold apposition Diminished rostrocaudal F-actin cables are associated with increased (Galea et al., 2018; Nishimura