DOCSLIB.ORG

Grand Unified Theory Running Grand Unified Theory, Running Coupling

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Grand Unified Theory Running Grand Unified Theory, Running Coupling Grand Unified Theory, Running Coupling Constants and the Story of our UiUniverse These next theories are in a less rigorous state and we shall talk about them, keeping in mind that they are at the ‘”edge” of what is understood today. Nevertheless, they represent a qualitative view of our universe, from the perspective of particle physics and cosmology. GUT ‐‐ Grand Unified Theories – symmetry between quarks and leptons; decay of the proton. Running coupling constants: at one time in the development of the universe all the forces had the same strength Story of our universe: a big bang, cooling and expanding, phase transitions and broken symmetries We have incorporated into the Lagrangian density invariance under rotations in U(1)XSU(2)flavor space and SU(3)color space, but these were not really unifie d. That is, the gauge bosons, (h(photon, W, and Z, and gluons) were not manifestations of the same force field. If one were to “unify” these fields, how might it occur? The attempts to do so are called Grand Unified Theories. Grand Unified Theory (GUT) GUT includes invariance under U(1) X SU(2)flavor space and SU(3)color and invariance under the following transformations: quarks leptons leptons quarks Grand Unified Theory ‐ SU(5) SU(5) Georgii & Glashow, Phys. Rev Lett. 32, 438 (1974). 15 Quarks mx 10 GeV & leptons in same 8 d red multiplet rgb gluons d 24 green Gauge ; bosons L d blue 0 + e‐ (W +B) W ‐ 0 ‐ Left handed W (W +B) SU(5) Gauge invariance L SU(5) is invariant under gau e‐i(x,y,t) For symmetry under SU(5), the x and y particles must be massless! SU(5) generators and covariant derivative 2 The 5 ‐1 = 24 generators of SU(5) are the i 555x5 matitrices whic h do not commute. SU(5) is a non‐abelian local gauge theory. i(x,y,t) has 24 components: i(x,y,t) = all real, continuous functions /2 i where i = the 24 gauge bosons D = ‐ i g5 j124j=1,24jX X This includes the Standard Model covariant derivative (couplings are different). Predictions: a) qup = 2/3 ; qd = ‐1/3 2 b) sin W ‐.23 c) the proton decays! > 1034 years d) baryon number not conserved e) only one coupling constant, g5 (g1, g2, and g3, are related) So far, there is no evidence that the proton decays. But note that the lifetime of the universe is 14 billion years. The probability of detecting a decaying proton depends a large sample of protons! “Particle Physics and Cosmology”, PDP.D. B. Collins, A. D. Martin and E. J. Squires, Wiley, NY, page 169 i The term j =1,2,…,24jX /2 can be written: same as SU(3)color _ _ | | | | B | | |_ _| 24 . same as SU(2)flavor this matrix X comes in 3 color states with |Q| = 4/3 y comes in 3 color states with |Q| = 1/3 g5 The GUT SU(5) Lagrangian density (1st generation only) Standard Model terms g itint. 5 SU(5) ‐ X + quark to lepton, no color change 3‐color = 1,2,3 vertex Q = ‐ 4/3 ‐ Y 3‐color = 1,2,3 quark to lepton, no color change vertex Q= ‐ 1/3 + + + Hermitian Conjugate (contains X and Y terms) Note: one coupling constant, g5 Charge conjugation T transpose operator 31 a great failure of SU(5)! proton, SU(5) 10 years ‐‐ a great failure for SU(5) charge ‐4/3 dred X red e+ e+ Decay of proton in SU(5) d d red red 0 anti‐up ‐ green u green d red ‐red u X blue X+ red blue 3‐color + vertex e proton X +red green blue SUPER SYMMETRIC (SUSY) THEORIES: SUSYs contitain iiinvariance of the LiLagrangian ditdensity under operations whic h change bosons (spin = 01,2,..) fermions (spin = ½, 3/2 …). SUSY unifies E&M, weak, strong (SU(3) and gravity fields. usually includes invariance under local transformations http://www.pha.jhu.edu/~gbruhn/IntroSUSY.html Supergravity Supersymmetric String Theories Elementary particles are one‐dimensional strings: open strings closed strings .no free or parameters L = 2r ‐33 19 2 L = 10 cm. = Planck Length Mplanck 10 GeV/c See Schwarz, Physics Today, November 1987, p. 33 “Supers tr ings ” The Planck Mass is approximately that mass whose gravitational potential is the same strength as the strong QCD force at r 10‐15 cm. An alternate definition is the mass of the Planck Particle, a hypothetical miniscule black hole whose Schwarzchild radius is equal to the Planck Length. A quick way to estimate the Planck mass is as follows: gstrong ℏc/r = GMpMp/r ‐15 where r = 10 cm (strong force range) and gstrong = 1 1/2 Mp = [gstrong ℏc/G] 19 = 1.3 x 10 mproton 19 2 MPlanck 10 GeV/c Particle Physics and the Development of the Universe Very early universe All ideas concerning the very early universe are speculative. As of early today, no accelerator experiments probe energies of sufficient magnitude to provide any experimental insight into the behavior of matter at the energy levels that prevailed during this period. Planck epoch Up to 10 –43seconds after the Big Bang At the energy levels that prevailed during the Planck epoch the four fundamental forces— electromagnetism U(1) , gravitation, weak SU(2), and the strong SU(3) color —areassumed to all have the same strength, and “unified” in one fundamental force. Little is known about this epoch. Theories of supergravity/ supersymmetry, such as string theory, are candidates for describing this era. Grand unification epoch: GUT Between 10–43 seconds and 10–36 seconds after the Biggg Bang The universe expands and cools from the Planck epoch. After about 10–43 seconds the gravitational interactions are no longer unified with the electromagnetic U(1) , weak SU(2), and the strong SU(3) color interactions. Supersymmetry/Supergravity symmetires are roken. After 10–43 seconds the universe enters the Grand Unified Theory (GUT) epoch. A candidate for GUT is SU(5) symmetry. In this realm the proton can decay, quarks are changed into leptons and all the gauge particles (X,Y, W, Z, gluons and photons), quarks and leptons are massless. The strong, weak and electromagnetic fields are unified. Running Coupling Constants Electro weak unification Planck region Electro‐ Super‐ Weak symmetry Symmetry SU(3) breaking GUT electroweak GeV Inflation and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking. At about 10–36 seconds and an average thermal energy kT 1015 GeV, a phase transition is believed to have taken place. In this phase transition, the vacuum state undergoes spontaneous symmetry breaking. Spontaneous symmetry breaking: Consider a system in which all the spins can be up, or all can be down – with each configuration having the same energy. There is perfect symmetry between the two states and one could, in theory, transform the system from one state to the other without altering the energy. But, when the system actually selects a configuration where all the spins are up, the symmetry is “spontaneously” broken. Higgs Mechanism When the phase transition takes place the vacuum state transforms into a Higgs particle (with mass) and so‐called Goldstone bosons with no mass. The Goldstone bosons “give up” their mass to the gauge particles (X and Y gain masses 1015 GeV). The Higgs keeps its mass ( the thermal energy of the universe, kT 1015 GeV). This Higgs particle has too large a mass to be seen in accelerators. What causes the inflation? The universe “fa llsinto” a low energy state, oscillates about the minimum (giving rise to the masses) and then expands rapidly. When the phase transition takes pp,lace, latent heat ((gy)energy) is released. The X and Y decay into ordinary particles, giving off energy. It is this rapid expansion that results in the inflation and gives rise to the “fla t” and homogeneous universeweobserve tdtoday. Theexpansion is exponential in time. Schematic of Inflation 2/3 R(t) m 1019 T (GeV/k) Rt Rt1/2 T t‐1/2 1014 R eHt T t‐1/2 1/2 Rt Tt‐2/3 10‐13 T=2.7K 10‐43 10‐34 10‐31 time (sec) 10 Electroweak epoch BtBetween 10–36 seconds and 10–12 seconds after the Big Bang The SU(3) color force is no longer unified with the U(1)x SU(2) weak force. The only surviving symmetries are: SU(3) separately, and U(1)X SU(2). The W and Z are massless. A second phase transition takes place at about 10–12 seconds at kT = 100 GeV.In this phase transition, a second Higgs particle is generated with mass close to 100 GeV; the Goldstone bosons give up their mass to the W, Z and the particles (quarks and leptons). It is the search for this second Higgs particle that is taking place in the particle accelerators at the present time. After the Big Bang: the first 10‐6 Seconds 0 inflation W , Z Planck Era gravity X,Y. take take on decouples on mass mass SUSY Supergravity GUT SU(2) x U(1) symmetry . all forces unified bosons fermions quarks leptons . all particles massless W , Z0 . take on mass COBE data . Standard Model 2.7K 100Gev . only gluons and photons are massless . atoms formed n, p formed nuclei formed . Field theoretic treatment of the Higgs mechanism One can incorporate the Higgs mechanism into the Lagrangian density by including scalar fields for the vacuum state. When the scalar fields undergo a gauge transformation, they generate the particle masses. The Lagrangian density is then no longer gauge invariant. The symmetry is broken.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 7. Gamma and X-Ray Interactions in Matter
    Photon interactions in matter Gamma- and X-Ray • Compton effect • Photoelectric effect Interactions in Matter • Pair production • Rayleigh (coherent) scattering Chapter 7 • Photonuclear interactions F.A. Attix, Introduction to Radiological Kinematics Physics and Radiation Dosimetry Interaction cross sections Energy-transfer cross sections Mass attenuation coefficients 1 2 Compton interaction A.H. Compton • Inelastic photon scattering by an electron • Arthur Holly Compton (September 10, 1892 – March 15, 1962) • Main assumption: the electron struck by the • Received Nobel prize in physics 1927 for incoming photon is unbound and stationary his discovery of the Compton effect – The largest contribution from binding is under • Was a key figure in the Manhattan Project, condition of high Z, low energy and creation of first nuclear reactor, which went critical in December 1942 – Under these conditions photoelectric effect is dominant Born and buried in • Consider two aspects: kinematics and cross Wooster, OH http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Compton sections http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=22551 3 4 Compton interaction: Kinematics Compton interaction: Kinematics • An earlier theory of -ray scattering by Thomson, based on observations only at low energies, predicted that the scattered photon should always have the same energy as the incident one, regardless of h or • The failure of the Thomson theory to describe high-energy photon scattering necessitated the • Inelastic collision • After the collision the electron departs
    [Show full text]
  • Abdus Salam United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural International XA0101583 Organization Centre
    the 1(72001/34 abdus salam united nations educational, scientific and cultural international XA0101583 organization centre international atomic energy agency for theoretical physics NEW DIMENSIONS NEW HOPES Utpal Sarkar Available at: http://www.ictp.trieste.it/-pub-off IC/2001/34 United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization and International Atomic Energy Agency THE ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS NEW DIMENSIONS NEW HOPES Utpal Sarkar1 Physics Department, Visva Bharati University, Santiniketan 731235, India and The Abdus Salam Insternational Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy. Abstract We live in a four dimensional world. But the idea of unification of fundamental interactions lead us to higher dimensional theories. Recently a new theory with extra dimensions has emerged, where only gravity propagates in the extra dimension and all other interactions are confined in only four dimensions. This theory gives us many new hopes. In earlier theories unification of strong, weak and the electromagnetic forces was possible at around 1016 GeV in a grand unified theory (GUT) and it could get unified with gravity at around the Planck scale of 1019 GeV. With this new idea it is possible to bring down all unification scales within the reach of the next generation accelerators, i.e., around 104 GeV. MIRAMARE - TRIESTE May 2001 1 Regular Associate of the Abdus Salam ICTP. E-mail: [email protected] 1 Introduction In particle physics we try to find out what are the fundamental particles and how they interact. This is motivated from the belief that there must be some fundamental law that governs ev- erything.
    [Show full text]
  • The Matter – Antimatter Asymmetry of the Universe and Baryogenesis
    The matter – antimatter asymmetry of the universe and baryogenesis Andrew Long Lecture for KICP Cosmology Class Feb 16, 2017 Baryogenesis Reviews in General • Kolb & Wolfram’s Baryon Number Genera.on in the Early Universe (1979) • Rio5o's Theories of Baryogenesis [hep-ph/9807454]} (emphasis on GUT-BG and EW-BG) • Rio5o & Trodden's Recent Progress in Baryogenesis [hep-ph/9901362] (touches on EWBG, GUTBG, and ADBG) • Dine & Kusenko The Origin of the Ma?er-An.ma?er Asymmetry [hep-ph/ 0303065] (emphasis on Affleck-Dine BG) • Cline's Baryogenesis [hep-ph/0609145] (emphasis on EW-BG; cartoons!) Leptogenesis Reviews • Buchmuller, Di Bari, & Plumacher’s Leptogenesis for PeDestrians, [hep-ph/ 0401240] • Buchmulcer, Peccei, & Yanagida's Leptogenesis as the Origin of Ma?er, [hep-ph/ 0502169] Electroweak Baryogenesis Reviews • Cohen, Kaplan, & Nelson's Progress in Electroweak Baryogenesis, [hep-ph/ 9302210] • Trodden's Electroweak Baryogenesis, [hep-ph/9803479] • Petropoulos's Baryogenesis at the Electroweak Phase Transi.on, [hep-ph/ 0304275] • Morrissey & Ramsey-Musolf Electroweak Baryogenesis, [hep-ph/1206.2942] • Konstandin's Quantum Transport anD Electroweak Baryogenesis, [hep-ph/ 1302.6713] Constituents of the Universe formaon of large scale structure (galaxy clusters) stars, planets, dust, people late ame accelerated expansion Image stolen from the Planck website What does “ordinary matter” refer to? Let’s break it down to elementary particles & compare number densities … electron equal, universe is neutral proton x10 billion 3⇣(3) 3 3 n =3 T 168 cm− neutron x7 ⌫ ⇥ 4⇡2 ⌫ ' matter neutrinos photon positron =0 2⇣(3) 3 3 n = T 413 cm− γ ⇡2 CMB ' anti-proton =0 3⇣(3) 3 3 anti-neutron =0 n =3 T 168 cm− ⌫¯ ⇥ 4⇡2 ⌫ ' anti-neutrinos antimatter What is antimatter? First predicted by Dirac (1928).
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Inelastic Scattering
    Particle Physics Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof Mark Thomson e– p Handout 6 : Deep Inelastic Scattering Prof. M.A. Thomson Michaelmas 2011 176 e– p Elastic Scattering at Very High q2 ,At high q2 the Rosenbluth expression for elastic scattering becomes •From e– p elastic scattering, the proton magnetic form factor is at high q2 Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 935 •Due to the finite proton size, elastic scattering M.Breidenbach et al., at high q2 is unlikely and inelastic reactions where the proton breaks up dominate. e– e– q p X Prof. M.A. Thomson Michaelmas 2011 177 Kinematics of Inelastic Scattering e– •For inelastic scattering the mass of the final state hadronic system is no longer the proton mass, M e– •The final state hadronic system must q contain at least one baryon which implies the final state invariant mass MX > M p X For inelastic scattering introduce four new kinematic variables: ,Define: Bjorken x (Lorentz Invariant) where •Here Note: in many text books W is often used in place of MX Proton intact hence inelastic elastic Prof. M.A. Thomson Michaelmas 2011 178 ,Define: e– (Lorentz Invariant) e– •In the Lab. Frame: q p X So y is the fractional energy loss of the incoming particle •In the C.o.M. Frame (neglecting the electron and proton masses): for ,Finally Define: (Lorentz Invariant) •In the Lab. Frame: is the energy lost by the incoming particle Prof. M.A. Thomson Michaelmas 2011 179 Relationships between Kinematic Variables •Can rewrite the new kinematic variables in terms of the squared centre-of-mass energy, s, for the electron-proton collision e– p Neglect mass of electron •For a fixed centre-of-mass energy, it can then be shown that the four kinematic variables are not independent.
    [Show full text]
  • Electro-Weak Interactions
    Electro-weak interactions Marcello Fanti Physics Dept. | University of Milan M. Fanti (Physics Dep., UniMi) Fundamental Interactions 1 / 36 The ElectroWeak model M. Fanti (Physics Dep., UniMi) Fundamental Interactions 2 / 36 Electromagnetic vs weak interaction Electromagnetic interactions mediated by a photon, treat left/right fermions in the same way g M = [¯u (eγµ)u ] − µν [¯u (eγν)u ] 3 1 q2 4 2 1 − γ5 Weak charged interactions only apply to left-handed component: = L 2 Fermi theory (effective low-energy theory): GF µ 5 ν 5 M = p u¯3γ (1 − γ )u1 gµν u¯4γ (1 − γ )u2 2 Complete theory with a vector boson W mediator: g 1 − γ5 g g 1 − γ5 p µ µν p ν M = u¯3 γ u1 − 2 2 u¯4 γ u2 2 2 q − MW 2 2 2 g µ 5 ν 5 −−−! u¯3γ (1 − γ )u1 gµν u¯4γ (1 − γ )u2 2 2 low q 8 MW p 2 2 g −5 −2 ) GF = | and from weak decays GF = (1:1663787 ± 0:0000006) · 10 GeV 8 MW M. Fanti (Physics Dep., UniMi) Fundamental Interactions 3 / 36 Experimental facts e e Electromagnetic interactions γ Conserves charge along fermion lines ¡ Perfectly left/right symmetric e e Long-range interaction electromagnetic µ ) neutral mass-less mediator field A (the photon, γ) currents eL νL Weak charged current interactions Produces charge variation in the fermions, ∆Q = ±1 W ± Acts only on left-handed component, !! ¡ L u Short-range interaction L dL ) charged massive mediator field (W ±)µ weak charged − − − currents E.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Flavour Physics
    Introduction to flavour physics Y. Grossman Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Abstract In this set of lectures we cover the very basics of flavour physics. The lec- tures are aimed to be an entry point to the subject of flavour physics. A lot of problems are provided in the hope of making the manuscript a self-study guide. 1 Welcome statement My plan for these lectures is to introduce you to the very basics of flavour physics. After the lectures I hope you will have enough knowledge and, more importantly, enough curiosity, and you will go on and learn more about the subject. These are lecture notes and are not meant to be a review. In the lectures, I try to talk about the basic ideas, hoping to give a clear picture of the physics. Thus many details are omitted, implicit assumptions are made, and no references are given. Yet details are important: after you go over the current lecture notes once or twice, I hope you will feel the need for more. Then it will be the time to turn to the many reviews [1–10] and books [11, 12] on the subject. I try to include many homework problems for the reader to solve, much more than what I gave in the actual lectures. If you would like to learn the material, I think that the problems provided are the way to start. They force you to fully understand the issues and apply your knowledge to new situations. The problems are given at the end of each section.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Lecture 2 Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe. What's
    Outline of Lecture 2 Baryon asymmetry of the Universe. What’s the problem? Electroweak baryogenesis. Electroweak baryon number violation Electroweak transition What can make electroweak mechanism work? Dark energy Baryon asymmetry of the Universe There is matter and no antimatter in the present Universe. Baryon-to-photon ratio, almost constant in time: nB 10 ηB = 6 10− ≡ nγ · Baryon-to-entropy, constant in time: n /s = 0.9 10 10 B · − What’s the problem? Early Universe (T > 1012 K = 100 MeV): creation and annihilation of quark-antiquark pairs ⇒ n ,n n q q¯ ≈ γ Hence nq nq¯ 9 − 10− nq + nq¯ ∼ How was this excess generated in the course of the cosmological evolution? Sakharov conditions To generate baryon asymmetry, three necessary conditions should be met at the same cosmological epoch: B-violation C-andCP-violation Thermal inequilibrium NB. Reservation: L-violation with B-conservation at T 100 GeV would do as well = Leptogenesis. & ⇒ Can baryon asymmetry be due to electroweak physics? Baryon number is violated in electroweak interactions. Non-perturbative effect Hint: triangle anomaly in baryonic current Bµ : 2 µ 1 gW µνλρ a a ∂ B = 3colors 3generations ε F F µ 3 · · · 32π2 µν λρ ! "Bq a Fµν: SU(2)W field strength; gW : SU(2)W coupling Likewise, each leptonic current (n = e, µ,τ) g2 ∂ Lµ = W ε µνλρFa Fa µ n 32π2 · µν λρ a 1 Large field fluctuations, Fµν ∝ gW− may have g2 Q d3xdt W ε µνλρFa Fa = 0 ≡ 32 2 · µν λρ ' # π Then B B = d3xdt ∂ Bµ =3Q fin− in µ # Likewise L L =Q n, fin− n, in B is violated, B L is not.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics Beyond the Standard Model (BSM)
    Vorlesung 10: Search for Physics Beyond the Standard Model (BSM) • Standard Model : success and problems • Grand Unified Theories (GUT) • Supersymmetrie (SUSY) – theory – direct searches • other models / ideas for physics BSM Tevatron and LHC WS17/18 TUM S.Bethke, F. Simon V10: BSM 1 The Standard Model of particle physics... • fundamental fermions: 3 pairs of quarks plus 3 pairs of leptons • fundamental interactions: through gauge fields, manifested in – W±, Z0 and γ (electroweak: SU(2)xU(1)), – gluons (g) (strong: SU(3)) … successfully describes all experiments and observations! … however ... the standard model is unsatisfactory: • it has conceptual problems • it is incomplete ( ∃ indications for BSM physics) Tevatron and LHC WS17/18 TUM S.Bethke, F. Simon V10: BSM 2 Conceptual Problems of the Standard Model: • too many free parameters (~18 masses, couplings, mixing angles) • no unification of elektroweak and strong interaction –> GUT ; E~1016 GeV • quantum gravity not included –> TOE ; E~1019 GeV • family replication (why are there 3 families of fundamental leptons?) • hierarchy problem: need for precise cancellation of –> SUSY ; E~103 GeV radiation corrections • why only 1/3-fractional electric quark charges? –> GUT indications for New Physics BSM: • Dark Matter (n.b.: known from astrophysical and “gravitational” effects) • Dark Energy / Cosmological Constant / Vacuum Energy (n.b.: see above) • neutrinos masses • matter / antimatter asymmetry Tevatron and LHC WS17/18 TUM S.Bethke, F. Simon V10: BSM 3 Grand Unified Theory (GUT): • simplest symmetry which contains U(1), SU(2) und SU(3): SU(5) (Georgi, Glashow 1974) • multiplets of (known) leptons and quarks which can transform between each other by exchange of heavy “leptoquark” bosons, X und Y, with -1/3 und -4/3 charges, ± 0 as well as through W , Z und γ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grand Unified Theory of the Firm and Corporate Strategy: Measures to Build Corporate Competitiveness
    THE GRAND UNIFIED THEORY OF THE FIRM AND CORPORATE STRATEGY: MEASURES TO BUILD CORPORATE COMPETITIVENESS by Hong Y. Park Professor of Economics Department of Economics College of Business and Management Saginaw Valley State University University Center, MI 48710 e-mail: [email protected] Geon-Cheol Shin Professor School of Business Kyung Hee University Seoul, Korea e-mail: [email protected] This study was funded by the Fulbright Foundation, the Korea Economic Research Institute (KERI), and Saginaw Valley State University. Abstract A good understanding of the nature of the firm is essential in developing corporate strategies, building corporate competitiveness, and establishing sound economic policy. Several theories have emerged on the nature of the firm: the neoclassical theory of the firm, the principal agency theory, the transaction cost theory, the property rights theory, the resource-based theory and the evolutionary theory. Each of these theories identify some elements that describe the nature of the firm, but no single theory is comprehensive enough to include all elements of the nature of the firm. Economists began to seek a theory capable of describing the nature of the firm within a single, all- encompassing, coherent framework. We propose a unified theory of the firm, which encompasses all elements of the firm. We then evaluate performances of Korean firms from the unified theory of the firm perspective. Empirical evidences are promising in support of the unified theory of the firm. Introduction A good understanding of the nature of the firm is essential in developing corporate strategies and building corporate competitiveness. Several theories have emerged on the nature of the firm: The neoclassical theory of the firm, the principal agency theory, the transaction cost theory, the property rights theory, the resource-based theory and the evolutionary theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Emission of Muonic X-Rays As a Spectroscopic Tool for the Investigation of the Local Chemistry of Elements
    nanomaterials Article Using the Emission of Muonic X-rays as a Spectroscopic Tool for the Investigation of the Local Chemistry of Elements Matteo Aramini 1, Chiara Milanese 2,* , Adrian D. Hillier 1, Alessandro Girella 2, Christian Horstmann 3, Thomas Klassen 3,4, Katsuo Ishida 1,5, Martin Dornheim 3 and Claudio Pistidda 3,* 1 UKRI Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, ISIS Pulsed Neutron and Muon Facility, Didcot OX11 0QX, UK; [email protected] (M.A.); [email protected] (A.D.H.); [email protected] (K.I.) 2 Pavia Hydrogen Lab, Chemistry Department, Physical Chemistry Section, C.S.G.I. and Pavia University, Viale Taramelli, 16, 27100 Pavia, Italy; [email protected] 3 Institute of Materials Research, Materials Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht GmbH, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany; [email protected] (C.H.); [email protected] (T.K.); [email protected] (M.D.) 4 Institute of Materials Technology, Helmut Schmidt University, Holstenhofweg 85, 22043 Hamburg, Germany 5 RIKEN Nishina Center, RIKEN, Nishina Bldg., 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected] (C.M.); [email protected] (C.P.) Received: 4 June 2020; Accepted: 25 June 2020; Published: 28 June 2020 Abstract: There are several techniques providing quantitative elemental analysis, but very few capable of identifying both the concentration and chemical state of elements. This study presents a systematic investigation of the properties of the X-rays emitted after the atomic capture of negatively charged muons. The probability rates of the muonic transitions possess sensitivity to the electronic structure of materials, thus making the muonic X-ray Emission Spectroscopy complementary to the X-ray Absorption and Emission techniques for the study of the chemistry of elements, and able of unparalleled analysis in case of elements bearing low atomic numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taste of New Physics: Flavour Violation from Tev-Scale Phenomenology to Grand Unification Björn Herrmann
    The taste of new physics: Flavour violation from TeV-scale phenomenology to Grand Unification Björn Herrmann To cite this version: Björn Herrmann. The taste of new physics: Flavour violation from TeV-scale phenomenology to Grand Unification. High Energy Physics - Phenomenology [hep-ph]. Communauté Université Grenoble Alpes, 2019. tel-02181811 HAL Id: tel-02181811 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02181811 Submitted on 12 Jul 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The taste of new physics: Flavour violation from TeV-scale phenomenology to Grand Unification Habilitation thesis presented by Dr. BJÖRN HERRMANN Laboratoire d’Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique Théorique Communauté Université Grenoble Alpes Université Savoie Mont Blanc – CNRS and publicly defended on JUNE 12, 2019 before the examination committee composed of Dr. GENEVIÈVE BÉLANGER CNRS Annecy President Dr. SACHA DAVIDSON CNRS Montpellier Examiner Prof. ALDO DEANDREA Univ. Lyon Referee Prof. ULRICH ELLWANGER Univ. Paris-Saclay Referee Dr. SABINE KRAML CNRS Grenoble Examiner Prof. FABIO MALTONI Univ. Catholique de Louvain Referee July 12, 2019 ii “We shall not cease from exploration, and the end of all our exploring will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time.” T.
    [Show full text]
  • Unified Equations of Boson and Fermion at High Energy and Some
    Unified Equations of Boson and Fermion at High Energy and Some Unifications in Particle Physics Yi-Fang Chang Department of Physics, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, China (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: We suggest some possible approaches of the unified equations of boson and fermion, which correspond to the unified statistics at high energy. A. The spin terms of equations can be neglected. B. The mass terms of equations can be neglected. C. The known equations of formal unification change to the same. They can be combined each other. We derive the chaos solution of the nonlinear equation, in which the chaos point should be a unified scale. Moreover, various unifications in particle physics are discussed. It includes the unifications of interactions and the unified collision cross sections, which at high energy trend toward constant and rise as energy increases. Key words: particle, unification, equation, boson, fermion, high energy, collision, interaction PACS: 12.10.-g; 11.10.Lm; 12.90.+b; 12.10.Dm 1. Introduction Various unifications are all very important questions in particle physics. In 1930 Band discussed a new relativity unified field theory and wave mechanics [1,2]. Then Rojansky researched the possibility of a unified interpretation of electrons and protons [3]. By the extended Maxwell-Lorentz equations to five dimensions, Corben showed a simple unified field theory of gravitational and electromagnetic phenomena [4,5]. Hoffmann proposed the projective relativity, which is led to a formal unification of the gravitational and electromagnetic fields of the general relativity, and yields field equations unifying the gravitational and vector meson fields [6].
    [Show full text]