DOCSLIB.ORG

The Changing “Reality” of Our Universe by Ernst Behrens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Changing “Reality” of Our Universe by Ernst Behrens Torch Magazine • Winter 2019 The Changing “Reality” of our Universe By Ernst Behrens “What we call ‘reality’ consists shows the Earth, composed of the of an elaborate papier-mâché four Aristotelian elements—earth, construction of imagination and water, air, and fire—in the center. theory filled in between a few iron Surrounding it are eight spheres posts of observation” (Wheeler or “heavens” that are occupied by 358). This quotation from John the Moon, the Sun, the five known Archibald Wheeler, one of the planets, and the firmament of the foremost authorities on gravity and fixed stars. All these are objects general relativity, characterizes in of direct observation and part of After earning his doctorate in a nutshell his and other scientists’ Aristotle’s Physics or Wheeler’s physics in 1961 from the University understanding of “reality.” Careful “iron posts.” The “papier-mâché” of Göttingen in Germany, and a fellowship at the Nuclear Research observations and experiments of imagination starts in Book 8:4- Center in Grenoble, France, become a permanent record 6, where Aristotle postulates an Ernst Behrens became a nuclear of the knowledge base and are “unmoved mover” as the cause reactor physicist with the Siemens Corporation in Erlangen, Germany. seldom questioned. Controversies of all motion in the universe. As arise, however, over the way its name implies, it moves other Upon coming to the U.S. in 1966 as these “iron posts” are connected. things while remaining motionless a materials scientist, he worked first with the Lockheed-Georgia Company These controversies are usually itself. Book 12 of Metaphysics and then in 1969 with Armstrong accompanied by theories that continues to speculate about the World Industries in Lancaster, give rise to a “papier-mâché” divine, eternal, unchanging, and Pennsylvania, where he was a group leader and later a Research Fellow. of a frequently updated system immaterial nature of this “prime He has been pursuing an interest in of thought. Nowhere else is this unmoved mover” (“Unmoved astronomy and cosmology ever since situation more apparent than in the Mover”). It occupies the tenth his retirement in 1994. turbulent evolution of cosmology heaven in Apianus’ drawing, just His work has previously appeared from Aristotle through Copernicus above a ‘crystalline sphere’ on several times in The Torch, most to Einstein. heaven number nine. Finally, recently in the Spring 2015 issue, with “Paddling the Boundary Waters located on top of everything, is the Then and Now.” Cosmology before Copernicus “Empireum,” the “Habitation of (1543) God and all the Elect.” Other beliefs “The Changing ‘Reality’ of Our Universe” was presented to the imagine “only” the seventh heaven Lancaster club on November 6, 2017. Shortly before the Copernican to be the highest, representing a Revolution, Petrus Apianus (1495- state of great happiness. 1552), alias Peter Bienewitz, a well-known German humanist The ancient Greeks were very and cartographer, summarized the good at working with straight lines cosmology of his time in a book titled and circles. Claudius Ptolemy (90- Cosmographia (1524) by a famous 168 CE), the talented mathematician drawing (“Petrus Apianus”). It from Alexandria, described in 6 Torch Magazine • Winter 2019 his Almagest an elaborate system had precedents in ancient Greece word “revolution” acquired a of circles and epicycles, which (Aristarchos of Samos, about 310- second meaning as the overthrow enabled him to predict planetary 230 BCE) and were much simpler of an established order. In 1616 positions with an accuracy of one than Ptolemy’s, but they were the publication was placed on the degree. However, regarding the purely philosophical without any index of prohibited books, pending postulates of geocentricity and observational backing or “iron further revision. It took until 1758 uniform circular motion handed posts.” The Church allowed and for the original unrevised version down to him by Aristotle, Ptolemy even encouraged their discussion to be removed from that list. had to make compromises. The as long as they were presented center of the Universe was not as hypotheses only and not as The indisputable moment of exactly occupied by the Earth “reality.” truth for the two world models but by the center of the Deferent came as early as 1610. According adjacent to the Earth. The center to Ptolemy, Venus would never pass of the Epicycle moved uniformly The word behind the Sun, so it would always on the Deferent only from the be illuminated from behind or from vantage point of the Equant near “revolution” the side; therefore, it should appear the Earth on the opposite side of to us only as crescent-shaped. One the center. The Epicycle and any acquired morning in October 1610, Galileo inferior planet (Mercury or Venus) Galilei (1564-1642), professor at moving on its periphery remained a second the University of Pisa and court always between the Earth and the mathematician for the Grand Duke Sun. This complicated ancient meaning as the of Tuscany, was waiting with his analog computer represented, home-made telescope for Venus to almost incredibly, the accepted overthrow of rise. He had to look very carefully cosmological “reality” for 1,500 to see the gibbous phase of the years. Other astronomical analog an established planet, but he instantly knew that he computers existed that were was looking at a decisive argument even older, like the Antikythera order. against the Ptolemaic system. Mechanism (Schaefer 2), but their Galileo also knew that anyone else accuracy was not nearly as good as The new theory faced many with a telescope and the idea to Ptolemy’s. ideological obstacles, but one observe Venus could steal his show. purely scientific argument against By December 1610, Venus had Cosmology from Copernicus to a moving Earth was the absence waned to a half-lit phase. To gain Einstein (1543-1915) of visible star parallaxes (Seeds some extra observing time while 57-58). Of course, as we know protecting his priority of discovery, Western cosmology entered a today, stars are too far away for Galileo issued a Latin anagram new era with Nicolaus Copernicus their parallaxes to be noticed by the that he promised to unscramble (1473-1543). He was a church naked eye (Friedrich Bessel was the later: “Haec immatura a me iam official in the Kingdom of Poland first who measured a star parallax, frustra leguntur o.y.” (“These are with an interest in astronomy. in 1838-39). The enormous at present too young to be read After decades of hesitation for contrast between the vastness of by me”.) Finally, on New-Year’s fear of ridicule by the science the physical Universe and the Day 1611, he lifted the secret and community, he allowed his book De smallness of our own existence wrote to his fellow-astronomer revolutionibus orbium coelestium, must have been unthinkable in Johannes Kepler: “Cynthiae libri VI to be published shortly those days. Only much later figuras aemulatur mater amorum”; before his death. His ideas about were the radical consequences of in English, “The mother of loves the circular orbital movements Copernicus’ ideas fully appreciated emulates the phases of the Moon” of the planets around the Sun as “reality.” and from then on the (Maury 88-90). 7 Torch Magazine • Winter 2019 The discovery of the phases Saggiatore (“The Assayer”) laid the and instrumental in sentencing of Venus was Galileo’s greatest groundwork for modern research Giordano Bruno to die at the stake. triumph. It was the only scientific by emphasizing observation and He gave Galileo a stern warning in observation that directly experimentation as primary sources 1616 to stay in his field of science contradicted and thus invalidated for scientific truth rather than old and not to enter what he considered the Ptolemaic world model. Galileo wisdom handed down in scriptures. to be the Church’s exclusive domain wisely refrained from publicly This shift from religious to scientific of theological interpretation. His drawing this conclusion, but he “reality” in the Renaissance message was loud and clear: You shared his observations with his period has been appropriately do the observations—we draw the former student Benedetto Castelli called a “secularization of conclusions! Galileo complied and with Christopher Clavius, a thought” (Santillana vii). Based formally at first, but in 1624 the German Jesuit in charge of papal on telescopic observations of new Pope Urban VIII granted him astronomy (Palmieri 109-29). His sunspots, hills and valleys on the permission to describe the two observations were soon confirmed moon, Jupiter’s satellites, and the world systems in the form of a by the scientists of the Collegio phases of Venus, Galileo became a dialogue, provided his (the Pope’s) Romano, who awarded him an proponent of the heliocentric world views would be included. honorary degree. He was also a view while still remaining faithful guest of honor to cardinals and to the Church. In his 1615 Letter In the Dialogo sopra i due princes, had an audience with Pope to the Grand Duchess of Tuscany massimi sistemi del mondo Paul V, and was made a member of he argued at great length that the (“Dialogue Concerning the Two the prestigious Lincean Academy. “new astronomy” of Copernicus Chief World Systems”), which Only the year before, Galileo is compatible with the Holy was finally published in 1632, had written to Kepler: “My dear Scripture, including Joshua 10:1- the simple-minded Simplicio Kepler, what would you say of the 15. The manuscript was widely represents Ptolemy and appears to learned here, who, replete with circulated, but it did not convince be a caricature of the Pope and his the pertinacity of the asp, have the important personalities in arguments. This was a fatal mistake, steadfastly refused to cast a glance the Church hierarchy, who were because it unnecessarily alienated through the telescope? What shall already on the defensive against the many of Galileo’s former admirers, we make of all this? Shall we ongoing Reformation movement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volvelles of Knowledge. Origin and Development of an Instrument of Scientific Imagination (13Th-17Th Centuries)
    JLIS.it 10, 2 (May 2019) ISSN: 2038-1026 online Open access article licensed under CC-BY DOI: 10.4403/jlis.it-12534 Volvelles of knowledge. Origin and development of an instrument of scientific imagination (13th-17th centuries) Gianfranco Crupi(a) a) Sapienza Università di Roma __________ Contact: Gianfranco Crupi, [email protected] Received: 7 January 2019; Accepted: 9 January 2019; First Published: 15 May 2019 __________ ABSTRACT This contribution reconstructs the history of volvelle in movable books; books created for a wide range of different purposes (teaching, mnemonics, play, divining, etc.) including mechanical or paratextual devices demanding or soliciting the interaction of the reader. The investigation runs from hand-written books, considering some specific editorial genres, including calendars, books of fate, anatomical flap books, navigation handbooks etc. KEYWORDS Movable books; Ramon Lull; Matthew Paris; Regiomontanus; Apianus; Leonhard Thurneysser; Ottavio Pisani; Book of fate; Volvelle; Anatomical flap books. CITATION Crupi, G. “Volvelles of knowledge. Origin and development of an instrument of scientific imagination (13th-17th centuries).” JLIS.it 10, 2 (May 2019): 1-27. DOI: 10.4403/jlis.it-12534. __________ © 2019, The Author(s). This is an open access article, free of all copyright, that anyone can freely read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts or use them for any other lawful purpose. This article is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. JLIS.it is a journal of the SAGAS Department, University of Florence, published by EUM, Edizioni Università di Macerata (Italy).
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the Camera Obscura: Kepler's Experiment and Eory of Optical
    Early Science and Medicine 13 (2008) 219-244 www.brill.nl/esm Inside the Camera Obscura: Kepler’s Experiment and eory of Optical Imagery Sven Dupré* Ghent University Abstract In his Paralipomena (1604) Johannes Kepler reported an experimentum that he had seen in the Dresden Kunstkammer. In one of the rooms there, which had been turned in its entirety into a camera obscura, he had witnessed the images formed by a lens. I discuss the role of this experiment in the development and foundation of his new theory of optical imagery, which made a distinction between two concepts of image, pictura and imago. My focus is on how Kepler used his report of the experiment inside the camera obscura to criticize the account of image formation given in Giovanbattista Della Porta’s Magia naturalis (1589). I argue that this experiment allowed Kepler to sort out the confusion between images ‘in the air’—referring to the geometrical locus of images in the perspectivist tradition of optics—and the experimentally produced ‘projected images’, which were empirically familiar but conceptually alien to perspec- tivist optics. Keywords Johannes Kepler, Giovanbattista Della Porta, Jean Pena, experiment, natural magic, image in the air, Kunstkammer, camera obscura, Dresden, optical imagery, play *) e author is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow of the Research Foundation–Flanders. is work was partially funded by a Visiting Fellowship in the Sydney Centre for the Foundations of Science at the University of Sydney and by a Research Grant of the Research Foundation–Flanders. Previous and partial versions of this paper were pre- sented at the workshop “Inside the Camera Obscura,” organized by Sven Dupré, Wolfgang Lefèvre, and Carsten Wirth at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (Berlin) in July 2006 and at the workshop “Optics and Epistemology” at the Unit for History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Sydney in July 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/08/2021 05:36:47AM Via Free Access
    Chapter 5 Jacopo Strada as an Imperial Architect: Background 5.1 Introduction: The Austrian Habsburgs as Patrons of Architecture As we have seen, Emperor Ferdinand i took Jacopo Strada into his service in the spring of 1558, but only early in 1560 Strada received a permanent appointment as ‘ainem paumaister, bey unnsern gebewen alhier, that is an architect for the projects Ferdinand undertook in Vienna. He received his salary as such without interruption (though often with great delays) until he asked Rudolf ii to be discharged from his court functions in 1579.1 The mere fact of this salary, which was double the amount he received as an antiquary, is sufficient reason to assume that he was expected to contribute regularly to the architectural projects of Ferdinand i and Maximilian ii. Before attempt- ing a sketch of the extent and character of Strada’s contribution to these it is necessary, first to inquire into the needs and wishes of his patrons; secondly, to find out how the Imperial building activities were organized and what expertise was locally available; and thirdly, to define Strada’s exact qualifica- tions in the field. Imperial patronage of architecture was wide-ranging: the more important part of it was utilitarian and chiefly of a military character, as is borne out by the fact that the various Imperial architects, including Strada, were paid by the Hofkriegszahlamt, the war office, rather than by the Hofkammer, which was responsible for the remuneration of most other court officials. Most of these architects, master-masons and other technicians were employed predomi- nantly or even exclusively in Hungary, constructing fortifications against the Turks.
    [Show full text]
  • Science & Technology
    Science & technology Science & Technology e-catalogue Jointly offered for sale by: Extensive descriptions and images available on request All offers are without engagement and subject to prior sale. All items in this list are complete and in good condition unless stated otherwise. Any item not agreeing with the description may be returned within one week after receipt. Prices are EURO (€). Postage and insurance are not included. VAT is charged at the standard rate to all EU customers. EU customers: please quote your VAT number when placing orders. Preferred mode of payment: in advance, wire transfer or bankcheck. Arrangements can be made for MasterCard and VisaCard. Ownership of goods does not pass to the purchaser until the price has been paid in full. General conditions of sale are those laid down in the ILAB Code of Usages and Customs, which can be viewed at: <http://www.ilab.org/eng/ilab/code.html> New customers are requested to provide references when ordering. Orders can be sent to either firm. Antiquariaat FORUM BV ASHER Rare Books Tuurdijk 16 Tuurdijk 16 3997 MS ‘t Goy 3997 MS ‘t Goy The Netherlands The Netherlands Phone: +31 (0)30 6011955 Phone: +31 (0)30 6011955 Fax: +31 (0)30 6011813 Fax: +31 (0)30 6011813 E–mail: [email protected] E–mail: [email protected] Web: www.forumrarebooks.com Web: www.asherbooks.com www.forumislamicworld.com cover image: no. 26 v 1.0 · 26 July 2021 Invention of beet sugar manufacturing 1. ACHARD, Franz Carl. Die Europäische Zuckerfabrikation aus Runkelrüben, in verbindung mit der bereitung des Branntweins, des Rums, des Essigs und eines Caffee-Surrogats aus ihren abfällen, beschrieben und mit Kupfern erläutert durch ihren Urheber ..
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginnings of Magnetic Observations
    Magne3m and Mmosher? VOLU JUNE, 899 NUMBERz THE BEGINNINGS OF MAGNETIC OBSERVATIONS. 1 BY G. HELLMANN. After ChristopherColumbus discovered the magneticdeclina- tion, on the •3th oœSeptember, •492•or, as othersthink, the geo- graphical variation of the same•mariners began to bestow in- creasedattention on •he compass? Voyages to the West Indies becoming now more frequent, showed that the declination of the magnetic needle from the astronomical meridian, which on the west coastof Europe was easterly,decreased gradually toward the west, vanishedin the neighborhoodof the Azores,and then passedover intoa westerlydeclination. What wonder,then, that it wasthought that in this way the geographical longitude could be determined! ChristopherColumbus and SebastianCabot had alreadythought of the possibilityof sucha solutionof this, the mostimportant of the nautical problemsof that time, and in the sixteenth century the numberof thosewho sought to ascertainthe longitudemagnetically increasedvery materially. The fact that the line of no declination, or the agonic line, almost coincided with the zero meridian as adopted at that time--at least in that part of the Atlantic Ocean traversedby voyagersto the West Indies--certainlyhelped not a little to continuallystrengthen the belief in the possibilityof • Translatedby M•rs.L. A. Bauerfrom the originalarticle in the ZeiIschrifi der Gesellsch.d•2r2•rdkunde zu 2•erlin, Bd. XXXII, Heft e, with someadditions by the author. -•Further information, documents,and explanations follow at the close of the article, but could not be given with the translation. [PLATE III.] '74 6:. HœLL•ANN [vot. •rv,So. =..t termining the longitude with the aid of the compass. The agonit line was lookeelupon as a point of departure given by Nature her- self for the reckoning of longitude.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Saxon Leipzig Heliand Manuscript Fragment (MS L): New Evidence Concerning Luther, the Poet, and Ottonian Heritage
    The Old Saxon Leipzig Heliand manuscript fragment (MS L): New evidence concerning Luther, the poet, and Ottonian heritage by Timothy Blaine Price A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in German in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Irmengard Rauch, Chair Professor Thomas F. Shannon Professor John Lindow Spring 2010 The Old Saxon Leipzig Heliand manuscript fragment (MS L): New evidence concerning Luther, the poet, and Ottonian heritage © 2010 by Timothy Blaine Price Abstract The Old Saxon Leipzig Heliand manuscript fragment (MS L): New evidence concerning Luther, the poet, and Ottonian heritage by Timothy Blaine Price Doctor of Philosophy in German University of California, Berkeley Professor Irmengard Rauch, Chair Begun as an investigation of the linguistic and paleographic evidence on the Old Saxon Leipzig Heliand fragment, the dissertation encompasses three analyses spanning over a millennium of that manuscript’s existence. First, a direct analysis clarifies errors in the published transcription (4.2). The corrections result from digital imaging processes (2.3) which reveal scribal details that are otherwise invisible. A revised phylogenic tree (2.2) places MS L as the oldest extant Heliand document. Further buoying this are transcription corrections for all six Heliand manuscripts (4.1). Altogether, the corrections contrast with the Old High German Tatian’s Monotessaron (3.3), i.e. the poet’s assumed source text (3.1). In fact, digital analysis of MS L reveals a small detail (4.2) not present in the Tatian text, thus calling into question earlier presumptions about the location and timing of the Heliand’s creation (14.4).
    [Show full text]
  • Contexte, Biographie Et Œuvre De Pierre Apian (1495-1552)
    Contexte, biographie et œuvre de Pierre Apian (1495-1552) 1) Le savoir des humanistes de la Renaissance confronté aux nouvelles terres En ce début du XVIe siècle, de grands chamboulements ont lieu. Alors que des expéditions se lancent sur l'océan pour rejoindre les pays d'Orient, pour des raisons avant tout commerciales, et découvrent de nouvelles terres, les savants ressentent le besoin d'approfondir scientifiquement des ouvrages fondamentaux comme l'Almageste et la Géographie de Ptolémée (IIe s de notre ère). La traduction et l'analyse scientifique récentes de ces ouvrages fondateurs rendent difficiles la remise en cause de leur contenu. Dès le milieu du XVe siècle, ce sont les portugais qui veulent trouver une route maritime pour contourner l'empire commercial musulman. Ils dépassent le Cap de Bonne-Espérance au Sud de l'Afrique en 1488 alors que Ptolémée pensait qu'il n'y avait pas de passage. La première expédition de Vasco de Gama (1497-1499) ouvre la voie par l'est en naviguant sur l'océan jusqu'en Inde. Christophe Colomb, au nom de l'Espagne, part vers l'ouest et en 1498, lors de son troisième voyage met le pied sur un « nouveau continent1 » en croyant rejoindre la Chine ou un pays d'Orientpar l'ouest. Puis en septembre2 1522, le seul bateau rescapé de l'expédition du navigateur portugais Magellan rentre en Espagne après la première circumnavigation. En une trentaine d’année, ces expéditions remettent en cause la représentation du monde habité, l'œcoumène, de Ptolémée. Dans sa description du monde, ce dernier avait sous-évalué le périmètre de la Terre et surévalué l'amplitude en longitude de ce monde habité3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginnings of Magnetic Observations
    Magne3m and Mmosher? VOLU JUNE, 899 NUMBERz THE BEGINNINGS OF MAGNETIC OBSERVATIONS. 1 BY G. HELLMANN. After ChristopherColumbus discovered the magneticdeclina- tion, on the •3th oœSeptember, •492•or, as othersthink, the geo- graphical variation of the same•mariners began to bestow in- creasedattention on •he compass? Voyages to the West Indies becoming now more frequent, showed that the declination of the magnetic needle from the astronomical meridian, which on the west coastof Europe was easterly,decreased gradually toward the west, vanishedin the neighborhoodof the Azores,and then passedover intoa westerlydeclination. What wonder,then, that it wasthought that in this way the geographical longitude could be determined! ChristopherColumbus and SebastianCabot had alreadythought of the possibilityof sucha solutionof this, the mostimportant of the nautical problemsof that time, and in the sixteenth century the numberof thosewho sought to ascertainthe longitudemagnetically increasedvery materially. The fact that the line of no declination, or the agonic line, almost coincided with the zero meridian as adopted at that time--at least in that part of the Atlantic Ocean traversedby voyagersto the West Indies--certainlyhelped not a little to continuallystrengthen the belief in the possibilityof • Translatedby M•rs.L. A. Bauerfrom the originalarticle in the ZeiIschrifi der Gesellsch.d•2r2•rdkunde zu 2•erlin, Bd. XXXII, Heft e, with someadditions by the author. -•Further information, documents,and explanations follow at the close of the article, but could not be given with the translation. [PLATE III.] '74 6:. HœLL•ANN [vot. •rv,So. =..t termining the longitude with the aid of the compass. The agonit line was lookeelupon as a point of departure given by Nature her- self for the reckoning of longitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Ed 288 74; Se 048 756
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 288 74; SE 048 756 AUTHOR Bruno, Leonard C. TITLE The Tradition of Science: Landmarks of Western Science in the Collections of the Library of Congress. INSTITUTION Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. REPORT NO ISBN-0-8444-0528-0 PUB DATE 87 NOTE 359p.; Some color photographs may not reproduce well. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 ($30.00). PUB TYPE Books (010) -- Reference Aaterials - Bibliographies (131) -- Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MFO1 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Astronomy; Botany; Chemistry; *College Mathematics; *College Science; Geology; Higher Education; Mathematics Education; Medicine; Physics; *Science and Society; Science Education; *Science History; *Scientific and Technical Information; Zoology ABSTRACT Any real understanding of where we stand scientifically today and where we are headed depends to a great extent on an awareness of how we reached those scientific achievements. The increased impact of science and technology on our lives makes such an understanding even more important. For this reason, this book is intended to provide information about the major works of science in the collections of the Library of Congress. These selected works are organized here by traditional scientific discipline and are treated in historical and, generally, chronological order. The contents contain chapters on: (1) astronomy; (2) botany; (3) zoology; (4) medicine; (5) chemistry; (6) geology; (7) mathematics; and (8) physics. A bibliography provides information about particular Library of Congress collections to which a book or manuscript may belong, as well as specific bibliographic information. Title translations are also included. (TW) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 ANNUAL REPORT ART & EDUCATION Diana Bracco BOARD of TRUSTEES COMMITTEE W
    NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART 2011 ANNUAL REPORT ART & EDUCATION Diana Bracco BOARD OF TRUSTEES COMMITTEE W. Russell G. Byers Jr. (as of 30 September 2011) Victoria P. Sant Calvin Cafritz Chairman Leo A. Daly III Earl A. Powell III Robert W. Duemling Frederick W. Beinecke Barney A. Ebsworth Mitchell P. Rales Gregory W. Fazakerley Sharon P. Rockefeller Doris Fisher John Wilmerding Aaron I. Fleischman Juliet C. Folger FINANCE COMMITTEE Marina K. French Mitchell P. Rales Lenore Greenberg Chairman Rose Ellen Greene Timothy F. Geithner Richard C. Hedreen Secretary of the Treasury Helen Henderson Frederick W. Beinecke John Wilmerding Victoria P. Sant Benjamin R. Jacobs Chairman President Sharon P. Rockefeller Sheila C. Johnson Victoria P. Sant Betsy K. Karel John Wilmerding Linda H. Kaufman Mark J. Kington AUDIT COMMITTEE Robert L. Kirk Frederick W. Beinecke Jo Carole Lauder Chairman Leonard A. Lauder Timothy F. Geithner Secretary of the Treasury LaSalle D. Leffall Jr. Mitchell P. Rales Robert B. Menschel Harvey S. Shipley Miller Sharon P. Rockefeller Frederick W. Beinecke Mitchell P. Rales Victoria P. Sant Diane A. Nixon John Wilmerding John G. Pappajohn Sally E. Pingree TRUSTEES EMERITI Diana C. Prince Roger W. Sant Robert F. Erburu B. Francis Saul II John C. Fontaine Thomas A. Saunders III Julian Ganz, Jr. Fern M. Schad Alexander M. Laughlin Albert H. Small David O. Maxwell Michelle Smith Ruth Carter Stevenson Benjamin F. Stapleton Sharon P. Rockefeller John G. Roberts Jr. Luther M. Stovall Chief Justice of the EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Ladislaus von Hoffmann United States Victoria P. Sant President Alice L. Walton William L.
    [Show full text]
  • Apianus, Petrus (1495-1552). Astronomicum Caesareum
    Apianus, Petrus (1495-1552). Astronomicum Caesareum. Ingolstadii : in aedibus nostris [Petrus Apianus], 1540 mense maio [61] f.; 2º. Collation A-F4, G4+1, H-N4, O. Text in 2 columns, with printed marginalia. Imperial coat of arms of Charles V on verso of the title page. Author's coat or arms on colophon. Woodcuts throughout the text and hand-coloured moving disks. Ornate and historiated initials. Original vellum binding, restored. Vellum jacket. Interior made of twentieth-century millboard. Old shelfmarks on inside of back cover: XXIV/1/12 ; g 44/1/9 ; 16/1/12 ; 1/3. Seals/Stamps of convent of Santa Caterina of Barcelona on title page, with the convent's firemark at the bottom. Restored March 1992. The Astronomicum Caesareum is considered to be one of the most sumptuous printed books of the sixteenth century. The text and images throughout the entire volume combine colour with formal ingenuity. The extraordinary beauty of the illustrations prepared in the author's own printing workshop and the elegance of the typesetting make it one of the most outstanding products of the printing press. The book's author, Petrus Apianus (Latin name of Peter Bennewitz, known in Catalan as Pere Apià) made a name for himself as an expert in the fields of mathematics, astronomy, geography and the art of printing. Born on 16 April 1495 in Leisnig (Saxony), Apianus showed great interest in mathematics and astronomy from an early age and later went to Leipzig and Vienna to pursue these studies. In 1527, he received an appointment as professor of mathematics at the University of Ingolstadt, where he devoted himself to teaching and the publication of his research, attracting fame and recognition for his works, including Cosmographie , printed in 1524.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrus Apianus, Astronomicum Caesareum
    A truly regal copy of Apianus’ Renaissance astronomy text Petrus Apianus, Astronomicum Caesareum. Ingolstadt: Petrus Apianus, 1540. 19 1/2 inches x 13 1/8 inches (495 x 333 mm), 117 pages, 35 hand- colored woodcut volvelles, woodcut initials, hand-colored illustrations and tables throughout. Published by its author Petrus Apianus (1495–1552), Astronomicum Caesareum (Emperor’s Astronomy) is one of the great masterpieces of Renaissance printing. Apianus was an instrument-maker, astronomer, geographer, and printer, and his book was a comprehensive survey of contemporary planetary astronomy from the viewpoint of the new calculation technology. According to Owen Gingerich, it is “the most spectacular contribution of the bookmaker’s art to sixteenth-century science.” The most notable feature of this large folio volume is its series of volvelles, paper instruments that calculated astronomical, astrological, and calendarial data and planetary movements. Each of the thirty-five volvelles (from volvre, “to turn”) is a circular paper construction layered and held together with string. Each of the woodcut discs, superimposed upon one another, contain mathematical indices representing the possible positions of the known planets, the sun, and the moon, dates in the calendar year, etc., thus enabling the reader to calculate, for instance, the position of Mercury on a particular day in a specific year. Each of the volvelles, some with as many as six components, was hand colored in brilliant hues in Apianus’ studio. The beauty of this book distracts from its ultimate purpose as a sophisticated, functioning instrument, the most ambitious of the Renaissance. Astronomicum Caesareum also contains one of the earliest printed star charts, it chronicled the comet of 1531, later known as Halley’s Comet, and it illustrated the phenomenon of comet tails pointing away from the sun.
    [Show full text]