Deputy-Reeve Herbert E. Schnarr, Reeve Theodore Stock, County Clerk and Treasurer Charles H
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
27 October 2020
University of Waterloo BOARD OF GOVERNORS Tuesday 27 October 2020 Meeting 1:30 p.m. Teams Videoconference Please convey regrets to Emily Schroeder at [email protected]. Time MEETING Page Action OPEN SESSION 1:30 1. Conflict of Interest Oral Declaration 2. Remarks from the Chair Oral Information 3. Agenda/Additional Agenda Items Oral Input 1:35 Consent Agenda Motion: To approve or receive for information by consent items 4-8 below. 4. Minutes of the 2 June 2020 Meeting 4 Decision 5. Report of the President a. Promotion to Professor 11 Information b. Sabbatical and Administrative Leaves/Administrative 12 Decision/Information Appointments c. Recognition and Commendation 20 Information 6. Report of the Vice-President, Administration & Finance a. Incidental Fee Changes 29 Decision/Information 7. Reports from Committees a. Building & Properties 30 Information b. Executive 33 Information c. Finance & Investment 34 Information d. Governance 37 Information e. Pension & Benefits 38 Information 8. Report of the Vice-President, Academic & Provost a. Undergraduate/Graduate Admissions Update 39 Information Regular Agenda 1:40 9. Business Arising from the Minutes Input 1:45 10. Report of the Waterloo Undergraduate Student Association 42 Information 1 of 208 Board of Governors 27 October 2020 page 2 Time OPEN SESSION Page Action 1:55 11. Divestment and Carbon-Neutral Investment Discussion 44 Discussion a. James Schlegel, Chair, Finance & Investment Committee b. Olaf Weber, Representative of Faculty and Staff Signatories to Call for Divestment Letter; Truzaar Dordi, Representative of Students, and Fossil Free UW c. Discussion 2:10 12. Report of the President1 a. Strategic Plan 2020-2025 Accountability Update Oral Information b. -
Waterloo Wellington Local Health Integration Network Rural Health Care Review Final Report January 19, 2010
Waterloo Wellington Local Health Integration Network Rural Health Care Review Final Report January 19, 2010 Prepared by the Rural Health Working Group Waterloo Wellington LHIN Rural Health Care Review January 19, 2010 Table of Contents Section Page # Executive Summary 4 - 5 1.0 Introduction 6 -11 1.1 Rural Health Working Group 1.2 Overview and Context 1.3 Format of this Report 2.0 Proposed Framework for Rural Health Services in the WWLHIN 12 - 25 2.1 Vision for Rural Health Services 2.2 Proposed Framework for Enhanced and Integrated Rural Health Services 3.0 Demographic and Health Status Profile of Rural Areas in the WWLHIN 26-41 3.1 Defining ‘Rural’ and Measuring Rurality 3.2 Demographic and Socio-economic Indicators 3.3 Health Status Indicators 4.0 Rural Community Health Needs 42-50 4.1 Community Consultation Highlights 4.2 Local Rural Health Reports 5.0 Availability and Utilization of Health Services 51-69 5.1 Hospital Utilization 5.2 CCAC Utilization 5.3 Primary Care Services 5.4 Mental Health Services 5.5 Long-term Care and Community Support Services 6.0 Applying the Framework to Rural Communities in the WWLHIN 69-77 6.1 Future Scenarios 6.2 Current vs. Future Service Configuration 6.3 Recommendations for the WWLHIN References 78-82 Page 2 Waterloo Wellington LHIN Rural Health Care Review January 19, 2010 Appendices (Separate Document) Appendix A - Rural Health Working Group Mandate, Objectives and Membership Apppendix B – The Rural Health Challenge B.1 National/international Research B.2 Provincial Rural Health Reports B.3 Rural -
This Document Was Retrieved from the Ontario Heritage Act E-Register, Which Is Accessible Through the Website of the Ontario Heritage Trust At
This document was retrieved from the Ontario Heritage Act e-Register, which is accessible through the website of the Ontario Heritage Trust at www.heritagetrust.on.ca. Ce document est tiré du registre électronique. tenu aux fins de la Loi sur le patrimoine de l’Ontario, accessible à partir du site Web de la Fiducie du patrimoine ontarien sur www.heritagetrust.on.ca. ' ' The Corporation Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee P.O. Box 669, of the City Cambridge, Ontario N1 R 5W8 of Cambridge Telephone: (519) 623-1340 ___:----- FEB 9122) February 3, 1989 AC-65 Ontario Heritage Foundation Ministry of Culture and Communications • 2nd Floor • 77 Bloor Street W. Toronto, Ontario M7A 2R9 Attention: Nancy Smith Dear Ms. Smith: The City of Cambridge recently enacted by-laws for the following properties under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. R.S.O., 1980. Property By-law i • 1. 71 Bruce Street 25-89 2. 63 Grand Avenue N. 275-88 3. 58-76 St. Andrews St. 12-89 A copy of each by-law is enclosed. Should you have any further questions, please call me at (519) 740-4580. Yours truly, • • • Valerie Spring, VS/pd LACAC Co-ordinator. Encl. ' Cambridge City Council benefits from the Advice and Guidance it receives from Advisory Committees and Boards ------,-.------,-_ ----,,_,---_,,.------~--~---- ' ,-~--- - -" - - ,;, - ' ~- C" • BY-LAW NO. 25-89 OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF CAMBRIDGE Being a by-law of the City of Cambridge to designate the exterior of 71 BRUCE STREET, Cambridge, Ontario as a property of architectural significance. WHEREAS the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O., 1980, c. -
The Canadian Parliamentary Guide
NUNC COGNOSCO EX PARTE THOMAS J. BATA LI BRARY TRENT UNIVERSITY us*<•-« m*.•• ■Jt ,.v<4■■ L V ?' V t - ji: '^gj r ", •W* ~ %- A V- v v; _ •S I- - j*. v \jrfK'V' V ■' * ' ’ ' • ’ ,;i- % »v • > ». --■ : * *S~ ' iJM ' ' ~ : .*H V V* ,-l *» %■? BE ! Ji®». ' »- ■ •:?■, M •* ^ a* r • * «'•# ^ fc -: fs , I v ., V', ■ s> f ** - l' %% .- . **» f-•" . ^ t « , -v ' *$W ...*>v■; « '.3* , c - ■ : \, , ?>?>*)■#! ^ - ••• . ". y(.J, ■- : V.r 4i .» ^ -A*.5- m “ * a vv> w* W,3^. | -**■ , • * * v v'*- ■ ■ !\ . •* 4fr > ,S<P As 5 - _A 4M ,' € - ! „■:' V, ' ' ?**■- i.." ft 1 • X- \ A M .-V O' A ■v ; ■ P \k trf* > i iwr ^.. i - "M - . v •?*»-• -£-. , v 4’ >j- . *•. , V j,r i 'V - • v *? ■ •.,, ;<0 / ^ . ■'■ ■ ,;• v ,< */ ■" /1 ■* * *-+ ijf . ^--v- % 'v-a <&, A * , % -*£, - ^-S*.' J >* •> *' m' . -S' ?v * ... ‘ *•*. * V .■1 *-.«,»'• ■ 1**4. * r- * r J-' ; • * “ »- *' ;> • * arr ■ v * v- > A '* f ' & w, HSi.-V‘ - .'">4-., '4 -' */ ' -',4 - %;. '* JS- •-*. - -4, r ; •'ii - ■.> ¥?<* K V' V ;' v ••: # * r * \'. V-*, >. • s s •*•’ . “ i"*■% * % «. V-- v '*7. : '""•' V v *rs -*• * * 3«f ' <1k% ’fc. s' ^ * ' .W? ,>• ■ V- £ •- .' . $r. « • ,/ ••<*' . ; > -., r;- •■ •',S B. ' F *. ^ , »» v> ' ' •' ' a *' >, f'- \ r ■* * is #* ■ .. n 'K ^ XV 3TVX’ ■■i ■% t'' ■ T-. / .a- ■ '£■ a« .v * tB• f ; a' a :-w;' 1 M! : J • V ^ ’ •' ■ S ii 4 » 4^4•M v vnU :^3£'" ^ v .’'A It/-''-- V. - ;ii. : . - 4 '. ■ ti *%?'% fc ' i * ■ , fc ' THE CANADIAN PARLIAMENTARY GUIDE AND WORK OF GENERAL REFERENCE I9OI FOR CANADA, THE PROVINCES, AND NORTHWEST TERRITORIES (Published with the Patronage of The Parliament of Canada) Containing Election Returns, Eists and Sketches of Members, Cabinets of the U.K., U.S., and Canada, Governments and Eegisla- TURES OF ALL THE PROVINCES, Census Returns, Etc. -
Amongamerican Inventions the Conestoga Wagon Must Forever
THE CONESTOGA WAGON OF PENNSYLVANIA Michael J. Herrick: I60NQ American inventions thetne ConestOAaConestoga wa^onwagon must koreverforever be remembered with respect, for it was this wagon that •*Among orpa servicedG&ririn&A ara rapidlyroT^irHir settlingco+tiinrr western frontier.\u25a0Prnn+iAr* TheT'Vua area covering/wir#»i-itncr the state of Pennsylvania and extending to the whole of the Northwest Territory was promising land for free men and farmers. Men over- flowed the old colonies and looked to the West — the Alleghenies. They came here and carved out farms from the forest and prospered. The promise of prosperity brought with it the need for supplies, equipment, markets, transportation. To satisfy these needs, Pennsyl- vania originated the pack-horse trade and the Conestoga horse and wagon. Inthe years to follow this simple beginning, the Conestoga was to become one of the greatest freight vehicles America has ever known. 1 The Dutch farmers, who had moved into the fertile lands of Penn- sylvania, cleared away the forests to settle down on large plots of land and to force their livelihood from the earth. In a few years with frugality, fertile lands, industrious ways, and hard work, these German farmers found relative prosperity. They were soon producing and manufacturing enough to be able to sell at a good market, but where ? Over in Baltimore, Philadelphia and New York were good markets for coal, grain and meat. Yet the farmers had a logistics problem to solve first: how could they transport their goods that far, fast enough ? Certainly every farm had some type of cart or wagon to haul farm products. -
Designing the Airstream: the Cultural History of Compact Space, Ca. 1920 to the 1960S” a Thesis Submitted to the Kent St
"Designing the Airstream: The Cultural History of Compact Space, ca. 1920 to the 1960s” A thesis submitted to the Kent State University Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for General Honors by Ronald Balas Aug. 6, 2014 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Background 4 Airstream Design and Development 17 Data Visualization 25 Conclusion 34 List of Figures (if any) List of Illustrations (if any) List of Tables (if any) Preface, including acknowledgements, or acknowledgements alone if there is no preface List of Illustrations Model T with tent 10 Covered Wagon (vardos) 17 Diagram of Airstream 23 Diagram of music 25 Levittown 28 Airstream roundup 28 Airstream diagram 29 Girls on train 30 Airstream blueprint 30 Color diagram 31 Floor plan diagram 32 Base camp diagram with photos 33 I would like to thank Dr. Diane Scillia for all of her patience, guidance, and understanding during my commitment to this thesis. I would not have been able to complete this without her and her knowledge. I would also like to thank my wife, Katherine, and my kids for putting up with this ‘folly of going back to school at my age...’ "DESIGNING THE AIRSTREAM: THE CULTURAL HISTORY OF COMPACT SPACE, CA. 1920 TO THE 1960S" INTRO Since 1931, with more than 80 years of war, social, and political changes, there is an industry that began with less than 50 manufacturers, swelled within seven years to more than 400, only to have one company from that time period remain: the Airstream1. To make this even more astounding: the original design never changed. -
The Conestoga Wagon
The Conestoga Wagon By H. C. FREY N its beginning, the Conestoga Wagon originated, somewhere. I No one seems to know exactly when or where ; and few, if any of us, care very much about this unimportant detail. No evi- dence existing to the contrary, Lancaster County gets the credit for its origin. Had it originated in or near Boston, New Eng- land's literary geniuses would have written volumes about this old freight-carrying vehicle, and had it had its home in the South (Old Virginny) its praises would have been eulogized even beyond the imagination of a New Englander. Here in the Garden Spot of the world, where farming, farm exporting, and wagoning have been given the greatest amount of attention for generations, we are prone to sit idly by, or to be so busily engaged in agricultural and industrial pursuits that we have no time to display our civic pride on such an historical subject as the Conestoga Wagon. We have here in this locality associated the name "Conestoga" with almost everything from a shinplaster to a National Bank, and something should be said about the origin of the word. Just ex- actly how this word originated is a question and would furnish an interesting problem for the Lancaster County student of etymology. One of the earliest references we have to a word similarly pro- nounced is the name "Onestega" given to the stream on a map1 dated 1665. The name of the tribe of Indians, the stream, and the manor of Conestoga is another study, but we do know that all three of these were named long before either the Conestoga wagon or the Conestoga horse existed. -
MHBC CV Document
CURRICULUMVITAE Ian F. MacNaughton, MA, FCIP, RPP EDUCATION Ian MacNaughton has practiced planning and resource management since 1968, and founded MHBC in 1973. He was inducted as a Fellow of the Canadian Institute 1971 of Planners in 1998. Mr. MacNaughton’s experience covers a broad range of Masters of Arts, Regional Planning interests including facilitation / mediation, resource management, local and Resource Development government reform, economic strategies, commercial planning and University of Waterloo development, downtown revitalization, housing studies, waste management, expropriation, and land development of all types and scales. He has advised 1968 senior levels of government, local municipalities, and the private sector on issues Honours Bachelor of Arts relating to planning and resource management. He has served as a member of Urban and Regional Planning the Provincial Smart Growth Central Ontario Strategy Sub-Panel and alternate on University of Waterloo the Greenbelt Task Force. Mr. MacNaughton also specializes in aggregate planning and resource management, and has been qualified as an expert witness on future trends in the aggregate resource field. He has been involved in numerous hearings before the Ontario Municipal Board and other tribunals relating to aggregate issues. Mr. MacNaughton is experienced in the management of complex multi- disciplinary and municipal projects, as illustrated by his extensive project experience, and by his appointment as Chairman of the 1995 Mayor’s Task Force on Downtown Revitalization in Kitchener. Mr. MacNaughton also provides specializes services relating to local government reform including amalgamations, boundary adjustments, county restructuring, and service reorganization. He has participated in restructuring processes in Oxford County, Essex County, Sarnia-Lambton, and Perth County. -
The Cultural Heritage Element a Strategy for Preserving Our Sense of Place April 2006
Heritage The Cultural Heritage Element A Strategy for Preserving Our Sense of Place April 2006 envision The Comprehensive Plan for Lancaster County, Pennsylvania Lancaster County Table of Contents Introduction Key Message . 3 Our Challenge . 3 Purpose of This Plan . 4 Heritage: An Element of the Lancaster County Comprehensive Plan . 5 Need for the Plan . 7 Approach . 7 Contents of This Plan . 7 Goals, Objectives, and Strategies . 8 Existing Conditions Historical and Cultural Overview of Lancaster County . 13 Native American / American Indian Settlement . 13 Penn’s Woods and the Establishment of Lancaster County . 16 Settlement Patterns . 18 Religious Traditions in 18th-Century Lancaster County . 19 18th-Century Built Environment . 27 Agriculture in the 18th Century . 27 18th-Century Industries . 27 Revolutionary War and Early Republic . 28 Development of Free African Communities . 29Growing Transportation Network 30 of Contents Table Arts and Education in the 18th and 19th Centuries . 33 Slavery, the Civil War, and the Underground Railroad . 34 Agriculture in the 19th and 20th Centuries . 38 Manufacturing in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries . 39 Arts in the 20th Century . 41 20th Century to Today . 41 Preservation Planning In Lancaster County . 43 Past Efforts . 43 Present Efforts . 50 Preservation Trends . 53 Introduction . 53 Positive Trends . 56 Mixed Results . 61 Negative Trends . 66 Planning Process Guiding Principles . 73 Stakeholder Involvement . 73 Sustainability . 73 Integration of Supporting Studies . 73 Achievable Recommendations . 74 Research and Assessment . 74 Public Involvement Strategy . 75 Lancaster County Cultural Heritage Plan Task Force . 75 Regional Meetings . 76 Public Workshop: There’s No Place Like Home . 76 Public Involvement Findings . -
Lancaster Plain, C. 1730-1960
Agricultural Resources of Pennsylvania, c. 1700-1960 Lancaster Plain, c. 1730-1960 2 Lancaster Plain, 1730-1960 Table of Contents Lancaster Plain Historic Agricultural Region, c. 1730-1960....................................................... 4 Location ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Climate, Soils, and Topography................................................................................................ 10 Historical Farming Systems ...................................................................................................... 12 Diverse Production for Diverse Uses, c. 1730 to about 1780 ............................................... 12 Products, c 1730-1780 ...................................................................................................... 12 Labor and Land Tenure, 1730-1780 ................................................................................. 16 Buildings and Landscapes, 1730-1780 ............................................................................. 17 Farm House, 1730-1780................................................................................................ 17 Ancillary houses, 1730-1780 ........................................................................................ 19 Barns, 1730-1780 .......................................................................................................... 19 Outbuildings, c 1730-1780: ......................................................................................... -
Waterloo South Renewal
Waterloo South Renewal Waterloo South Population and Demographic Study Final Report March 2020 1 Waterloo South Renewal Table of contents 1. Executive summary ....................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Waterloo Estate ............................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Waterloo South ................................................................................................................ 12 2.4 Renewal Vision ................................................................................................................ 14 2.5 Purpose of this report ...................................................................................................... 16 2.6 Waterloo South planning proposal ................................................................................. 17 3. Baseline analysis - Strategic context for the Waterloo Precinct ................................. 20 3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Strategic context ............................................................................................................. -
Waterloo South Social Sustainability Report
Waterloo South Social Sustainability Report Client: Land and Housing Corporation (LAHC) Date: 04 September 2020 Contact: Steve Rossiter [email protected] 02 9387 2600 SYDNEY 02 9387 2600 Level 6, 332 - 342 Oxford Street Bondi Junction NSW 2022 www.elton.com.au [email protected] Sydney | Brisbane | Canberra | Darwin | Melbourne | Perth ABN 56 003 853 101 Prepared by Sophie Le Mauff, Alexander Iping, Jessica Noyes, Sarah Jones and Nash Condran Reviewed by Steve Rossiter and Lucy Greig Date 04 September 2020 Version FINAL draft EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 14 1.1 Overview 14 1.2 Waterloo Estate 14 1.3 Waterloo South 15 1.4 Redevelopment Vision 17 1.5 Purpose of this report 18 1.6 Study approach and methodology 18 1.7 Report structure 20 2 EXISTING AND FUTURE WATERLOO 21 2.1 Existing context and community profile 21 2.2 Future Waterloo 27 3 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE 35 3.1 NSW Government plans and policies 35 3.2 City of Sydney plans and policies 38 3.3 A framework for social sustainability in Waterloo 40 3.4 Social sustainability issues and opportunities 42 4 PLACE DIMENSIONS OF SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE 43 4.1 Housing 43 4.2 Access and connectivity 46 4.3 Public domain 47 4.4 Community infrastructure 52 4.5 Summary of place findings and recommendations 66 5 PEOPLE DIMENSIONS OF SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE 69 5.1 Social mix and integration 69 5.2 Community identity and connections 71 5.3 Affordability 72 5.4 Services and support systems 73 5.5 Employment and training