DOCSLIB.ORG

Symmes Creek, Indian Guyan Creek and Direct Ohio River Tributaries, 2016 Jackson, Gallia and Lawrence Counties, Ohio

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Symmes Creek, Indian Guyan Creek and Direct Ohio River Tributaries, 2016 Jackson, Gallia and Lawrence Counties, Ohio Biological and Water Quality Study of Symmes Creek, Indian Guyan Creek and Direct Ohio River Tributaries, 2016 Jackson, Gallia and Lawrence Counties, Ohio Symmes Creek at Symmes Creek Road CR 56 (RM 56.8) Ohio EPA Technical Report AMS/2016‐SYMME‐2 Division of Surface Water Assessment and Modeling Section Draft March 2020 TMDL DEVELOPMENT | AMS/2016‐SYMME‐2 Draft Biological and Water Quality Study of Symmes Creek, Indian Guyan Creek March 2020 And Direct Ohio River Tributaries, 2016. Biological and Water Quality Study of Symmes Creek, Indian Guyan Creek and Direct Ohio River Tributaries, 2016 Jackson, Gallia and Lawrence counties, Ohio March 2020 Ohio EPA Report DSW/AMS 2016‐SYMME‐2 Prepared by: State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216‐1049 Division of Surface Water Southeast District Office 2195 East Front Street Logan, Ohio 43138 Ecological Assessment Section Groveport Field Office 4675 Homer Ohio Lane Groveport, Ohio 43125 Mike DeWine, Governor State of Ohio Laurie A. Stevenson, Director Ohio Environmental Protection Agency AMS/2016‐SYMME‐2 Draft Biological and Water Quality Study of Symmes Creek, Indian Guyan Creek March 2020 And Direct Ohio River Tributaries, 2016. Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Components of an Ohio EPA Biological and Water Quality Survey ......................................................................................................... 13 What is a Biological and Water Quality Survey? ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Hierarchy of Indicators .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Ohio Water Quality Standards: Designated Aquatic Life Use ................................................................................................................ 15 Ohio Water Quality Standards: Non-Aquatic Life Uses ............................................................................................................................ 16 Mechanisms for Water Quality Impairment ................................................................................................................................................. 17 Habitat and Flow Alterations ......................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Siltation and Sedimentation ........................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Nutrient Enrichment ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Organic Enrichment and Low Dissolved Oxygen .................................................................................................................................. 19 Ammonia ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Metals ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Bacteria .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Sediment Contamination ................................................................................................................................................................................. 21 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Determining Use Attainment Status ........................................................................................................................................................... 22 Habitat Assessment ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 22 Sediment and Surface Water Assessment ................................................................................................................................................ 22 Recreation Use Assessment ............................................................................................................................................................................ 23 Macroinvertebrate Community Assessment .......................................................................................................................................... 23 Fish Community Assessment ......................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Causal Associations ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 23 Watershed Overview .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Study Area Description ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 33 Location and Scope .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 33 Ecoregions, Geology, and Soils ............................................................................................................................................................................ 33 Land Cover and Land Use ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 37 Census Data ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 39 Wastewater Discharge Overview ...................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Mineral Extraction .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 Iron Furnaces .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 42 Results ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 43 Water Chemistry ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 43 Sediment ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 59 Stream Physical Habitat ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 61 Fish Community ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 78 Macroinvertebrate Community .......................................................................................................................................................................... 91 Aquatic Life Use Discussion ............................................................................................................................................................................... 107 Symmes Creek ...................................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New State Records of Aquatic Insects for Ohio, U.S.A
    Volume 121, Number 1, January and February 2010 75 NEW STATE RECORDS OF AQUATIC INSECTS FOR OHIO, U.S.A. (EPHEMEROPTERA, PLECOPTERA, TRICHOPTERA, COLEOPTERA)1 Michael J. Bolton2 ABSTRACT: Biomonitoring of Ohio streams by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency has found new state records for the Ephemeroptera (mayflies): Baetis brunneicolor McDunnough, Iswaeon anoka (Daggy), Paracloeodes fleeki McCafferty and Lenat, Plauditus cestus (Provonsha and McCafferty), and Rhithrogena manifesta Eaton; the Plecoptera (stoneflies): Pteronarcys cf. biloba Newman; the Trichop- tera (caddisflies): Brachycentrus numerosus (Say) and Psilotreta rufa (Hagen); and the Coleoptera (bee- tles): Gyretes sinuatus LeConte, Dicranopselaphus variegatus Horn, and Microcylloepus pusillus (Le Conte). Additional records are given for the mayfly Paracloeodes minutus (Daggy). KEY WORDS: Ohio, state record, Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Coleoptera The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency conducts biological and water qual- ity studies of Ohio streams to ascertain the condition of the aquatic resource. One component of these studies is an evaluation of the macroinvertebrate communities. As a result of this sampling, species of aquatic insects in the Ephemeroptera (may- flies), Plecoptera (stoneflies), Trichoptera (caddisflies), and Coleoptera (beetles) orders have been collected that have never been reported from Ohio. Randolph and McCafferty (1998) compiled the first state list of mayflies for Ohio. Gaufin (1956) produced a state list of stoneflies for Ohio with additions by Tkac and Foote (1978), Robertson (1979), and Fishbeck (1987). Listing of species distributions by state in Stewart and Stark (2002) and Stark and Armitage (2000, 2004) incorporated Ohio records found in the various revisionary publications. Huryn and Foote (1983) pro- duced the first comprehensive state list of caddisflies which was amended by Mac Lean and MacLean (1984), Usis and MacLean (1986), Garono and MacLean (1988), Usis and Foote (1989), and Keiper and Bartolotta (2003).
    [Show full text]
  • SOP #: MDNR-WQMS-209 EFFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 2005
    MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AIR AND LAND PROTECTION DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PROGRAM Standard Operating Procedures SOP #: MDNR-WQMS-209 EFFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 2005 SOP TITLE: Taxonomic Levels for Macroinvertebrate Identifications WRITTEN BY: Randy Sarver, WQMS, ESP APPROVED BY: Earl Pabst, Director, ESP SUMMARY OF REVISIONS: Changes to reflect new taxa and current taxonomy APPLICABILITY: Applies to Water Quality Monitoring Section personnel who perform community level surveys of aquatic macroinvertebrates in wadeable streams of Missouri . DISTRIBUTION: MoDNR Intranet ESP SOP Coordinator RECERTIFICATION RECORD: Date Reviewed Initials Page 1 of 30 MDNR-WQMS-209 Effective Date: 05/31/05 Page 2 of 30 1.0 GENERAL OVERVIEW 1.1 This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is designed to be used as a reference by biologists who analyze aquatic macroinvertebrate samples from Missouri. Its purpose is to establish consistent levels of taxonomic resolution among agency, academic and other biologists. The information in this SOP has been established by researching current taxonomic literature. It should assist an experienced aquatic biologist to identify organisms from aquatic surveys to a consistent and reliable level. The criteria used to set the level of taxonomy beyond the genus level are the systematic treatment of the genus by a professional taxonomist and the availability of a published key. 1.2 The consistency in macroinvertebrate identification allowed by this document is important regardless of whether one person is conducting an aquatic survey over a period of time or multiple investigators wish to compare results. It is especially important to provide guidance on the level of taxonomic identification when calculating metrics that depend upon the number of taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Characters
    40 Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation: Final Report Leon C. Hinz Jr. and James N. Zahniser Illinois Natural History Survey Prairie Research Institute University of Illinois 30 April 2015 INHS Technical Report 2015 (31) Prepared for: Illinois Department of Natural Resources State Wildlife Grant Program (Project Number T-88-R-001) Unrestricted: for immediate online release. Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Brian D. Anderson, Interim Executive Director Illinois Natural History Survey Geoffrey A. Levin, Acting Director 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 217-333-6830 Final Report Project Title: Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation. Project Number: T-88-R-001 Contractor information: University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability Illinois Natural History Survey 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Project Period: 1 October 2013—31 September 2014 Principle Investigator: Leon C. Hinz Jr., Ph.D. Stream Ecologist Illinois Natural History Survey One Natural Resources Way, Springfield, IL 62702-1271 217-785-8297 [email protected] Prepared by: Leon C. Hinz Jr. & James N. Zahniser Goals/ Objectives: (1) Review all SGNC listing criteria for currently listed non-mollusk invertebrate species using criteria in Illinois Wildlife Action Plan, (2) Assess current status of species populations, (3) Review criteria for additional species for potential listing as SGNC, (4) Assess stressors to species previously reviewed, (5) Complete draft updates and revisions of IWAP Appendix I and Appendix II for non-mollusk invertebrates. T-88 Final Report Project Title: Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Page
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Section August 2004 This page was intentionally left blank NCDENR, Division of Water Quality Basinwide Assessment Report – Cape Fear River Basin - August 2004 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF APPENDICIES ........................................................................................................................ 5 LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................................... 7 LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. 11 OVERVIEW OF THE WATER QUALITY OF THE CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN.....................................17 EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES BY PROGRAM AREA.................................................................................27 FISHERIES ...................................................................................................................................... 27 BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES............................................................................................. 30 LAKE ASSESSMENT....................................................................................................................... 32 PHYTOPLANKTON MONITORING................................................................................................. 33 AMBIENT MONITORING................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cover Ent117-5
    Volume 118, Number 5, November and December 2007 517 SCIENTIFIC NOTE NEW ADDITIONS TO THE INVENTORY OF COLORADO MAYFLIES (EPHEMEROPTERA) AND CADDISFLIES (TRICHOPTERA)1 L. W. Myers2 and R. E. Younghanz2 There are currently 102 species of mayflies (McCafferty et al., 1993, Durfee and Kondratieff 1994, Durfee and Kondratieff 1997) and 198 species of caddis- flies (Herrmann et al., 1986, Ruiter 1990, Ruiter 1999) known from Colorado. In this paper, we report one new species record of mayfly Stenacron interpuncta- tum (Say) and one new species record of caddisfly Brachycentrus numerosus (Say) for the state. Both species were collected from the North Fork Republican River in Wray, Colorado, near the Kansas border. These collections extend the range westward for these two common, primarily eastern North American spec- ies (McCafferty and Huff 1978, Flint 1984). Stenacron interpunctatum is known to occur throughout Nebraska and Kansas (McCafferty et al., 2001). Likewise, B. numerosus is known from the central Nebraska counties of Brown and Thomas (unpublished data, C. P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Colo- rado State University), as well as from southwestern Kansas (Hamilton et al., 1983). These recent collections provide further evidence of the western dispersal of numerous aquatic insects via the Missouri River tributaries of eastern Colorado (Kondratieff and Ward 1987, Evans 1988, Zuellig et al., 2006). Further study is needed to determine where the two species occur in other suitable habi- tats of eastern Colorado in the South Platte and Arkansas River basins. The pres- ence of both S. interpunctatum and B. numerosus in southwestern Kansas sug- gests their possible occurrence in the Arkansas River basin near the Kansas- Colorado border.
    [Show full text]
  • Yadkin River Huc 03040102
    LUMBER RIVER BASINWIDE ASSESSMENT April, 2007 CONTENTS This document provides overviews from four program areas within the Environmental Sciences Section . They may be considered chapters or individual reports. The contributions from each unit are provided in the following order. BASINWIDE ASSESSMENT –Provides basin and subbasin overviews of water quality and detailed information on collections of benthic macroinvertebrates, fish community structure, and fish tissue analyses. Biological Assessment Unit - Page 2 LAKE & RESERVOIR ASSESSMENT-Provides lake & reservoir-specific information in the Lumber River Basin, and an overview of assessment methodology. Intensive Survey Unit - Page 95 AMBIENT MONITORING SYSTEM ASSESSMENT-Provides results of analyses from DWQ fixed station Ambient Monitoring System and Coalition Data, including temporal and spatial trends of chemical, hydrological, and physical data where appropriate. Ecosystems Analysis Unit - Page 102 WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY PROGRAM-Provides an overview of permits requiring (WET), compliance information, and brief summaries of actions by individual facilities and/or DWQ in response to WET limit failures. Aquatic Toxicology Unit - Page 168 BASINWIDE ASSESSMENT REPORT LUMBER RIVER BASIN NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Section April 2007 This page was intentionally left blank NCDENR, Division of Water Quality Basinwide Assessment Report - Lumber River Basin - April 2006 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF APPENDICIES
    [Show full text]
  • 1 New Ohio and Indiana Records of Aquatic Insects (Ephemeroptera
    Ohio Biological Survey Notes 9: 1–15, 2019. © Ohio Biological Survey, Inc. New Ohio and Indiana Records of Aquatic Insects (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Coleoptera: Elmidae, Diptera: Chironomidae) MICHAEL J. BOLTON1, SARAH K. MACY2, R. EDWARD DEWALT3, AND LUKE M. JACOBUS4 1Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water, 4675 Homer Ohio Lane, Groveport, OH 43125, Michael.Bolton@epa. ohio.gov; 2Formerly with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency; current e-mail: [email protected]; 3University of Illinois, Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 S Oak St., Champaign, IL 61820, [email protected]; 4Indiana University–Purdue University Columbus, 4601 Central Avenue, Columbus, IN 47203, [email protected]. Abstract: New state records and additional locations for rarely collected species are reported for Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies), Trichoptera (caddisflies), Coleoptera: Elmidae (riffle beetles), and Diptera: Chironomidae (chironomids, non-biting midges, midges). These specimen records result primarily from Ohio Environmental Protection Agency biomonitoring of Ohio streams and from records found in the Purdue University Entomological Research Collection and the Illinois Natural History Survey Insect Collection; a few records were derived from material housed in two other collections. New state records for Ohio consist of the mayflies Acentrella rallatoma Burian & Myers, Acerpenna pygmaea (Hagen), Anafroptilum album (McDunnough), Anafroptilum minor group species 1, Anafroptilum
    [Show full text]
  • Chamber Book 2011
    DISCOVER LAWRENCE COUNTY '' THE GREATER LAWRENCE COUNTY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Our Lady of Bellefonte Hospital TOP 5% IN THE NATION FOR PATIENT SATISFACTION OLBH has received the Outstanding Patient Experience 4th Award for four straight years from HealthGrades,® the leading independent healthcare ratings organization. Straight Year in # West Virginia in # the Tri-State Top % in the Nation in CareChex recently named the Edwards Comprehensive Cancer Center at Cabell Huntington Hospital as having the best cancer program in West Virginia and the Huntington/Ashland/Ironton area. It also ranked the Edwards Comprehensive Cancer Center in the Top 3% of all hospitals in the country for cancer care. The CareChex quality rating service provides a comprehensive evaluation of all components of medical quality, including process of care, outcomes of care, patient safety and patient experiences. No other health care provider in the Tri-State even comes close to the Edwards Comprehensive Cancer Center in the CareChex quality ratings for Cancer Care. So, if you’re looking for cancer care that’s not only the most advanced and comprehensive in the region – but also the highest in quality, look no further than the Edwards Comprehensive Cancer Center at Cabell Huntington Hospital – where you’ll find a distinct difference in cancer care. This data is from The Delta Group, an independent health care information company. The Delta Group, through its CARECHEX® rating service, uses both public and proprietary information to compare the quality of hospital and physician care to national, state and local standards. The program analyzes a variety of process, outcome and patient satisfaction measures to assign a composite quality score and rating.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Descriptions and Flow Characteristics of Ohio Streams
    Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water BASIN DESCRIPTIONS AND FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF OHIO STREAMS By Michael C. Schiefer, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Bulletin 47 Columbus, Ohio 2002 Robert Taft, Governor Samuel Speck, Director CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Purpose and Scope ……………………………………………………………. 2 Previous Studies……………………………………………………………….. 2 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………… 3 Factors Determining Regimen of Flow………………………………………………... 4 Weather and Climate…………………………………………………………… 4 Basin Characteristics...………………………………………………………… 6 Physiology…….………………………………………………………… 6 Geology………………………………………………………………... 12 Soils and Natural Vegetation ..………………………………………… 15 Land Use...……………………………………………………………. 23 Water Development……………………………………………………. 26 Estimates and Comparisons of Flow Characteristics………………………………….. 28 Mean Annual Runoff…………………………………………………………... 28 Base Flow……………………………………………………………………… 29 Flow Duration…………………………………………………………………. 30 Frequency of Flow Events…………………………………………………….. 31 Descriptions of Basins and Characteristics of Flow…………………………………… 34 Lake Erie Basin………………………………………………………………………… 35 Maumee River Basin…………………………………………………………… 36 Portage River and Sandusky River Basins…………………………………….. 49 Lake Erie Tributaries between Sandusky River and Cuyahoga River…………. 58 Cuyahoga River Basin………………………………………………………….. 68 Lake Erie Tributaries East of the Cuyahoga River…………………………….. 77 Ohio River Basin………………………………………………………………………. 84
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Jackson County, Ohio
    ^ Gc M.U 977.101 J13w v.i ; 1217096 I n«=:NE:AL.OGY COULECTIONf ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00827 1659 //Iciultjj /QuyiJci^ 6^64xiJE^ A HISTORY Jackson County, Ohio D. A^^. A\^II.I.IAMS Volume I. THE SCIOTO Salt Springs JACKSON, OHIO 1900 1217096 PREFACE. The preparation of this work has been a labor of love. It was undertaken not for profit, but for the pleasure which I derive from the study of the past. I have been urged to write a complete his- tory of Jackson county. The material for such a work has been collected, but its publication will depend upon the reception ac- corded to this volume, which is devoted to the period from the advent of man to the sale of the Scioto Salt Springs. Jackson, O., May 22, 1900. INTRODUCTION—Jackson is the seat of justice of an Ohio county of the same name. It is situated on an eastern branch of the Scioto river, in latitude 39 degrees, 15 minutes, north, and longitude 82 degrees, 41 minutes and 48 seconds, west. It was laid out in 1817, on the north half of Section 29, in the Scioto Salt Reserve. This township had been set aside by Congress May 18, 1796, on account of the salt springs within its limits. These springs or licks, are as old as the hills, for that erosion which carved out the valleys between, exposed the strata from which they flow. They were discovered by the wild animals of the forest, and became one of their most favored resorts long before man appeared upon the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Example Level 1
    (v. 2.0) OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1980 WEST BROAD STREET COLUMBUS, OHIO 43223 (614) 466-7100 Project C-R-S / Name: GAL-TR 752-0.29 Project Identification Number (PID): 93152 Report Type: Level One ESR (MOA) Report Author(s): Curt Hatton Ohio Department of Affiliation: Transportation, District 9 Phone: 740-774-8979 Email: [email protected] 7/20/2012 (OES Revised Date of Submission: 8-24-12) LEVEL 1 ECOLOGICAL SURVEY GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION ODOT District: 9 County(ies): Gallia Township(s): Walnut Latitude: 38.7558 Study Area Area of Construction 0.5 ac 0.1 ac Longitude: -82.4584 Size (ac): Limits (ac): Date of Survey Work (mm/dd/yyyy): 5/15/2012, 6/8/2012 and 7/3/2012 HUC 14: 05090101090030 Project Description (include a detailed description of the construction activities): It is proposed to replace a bridge over Symmes Creek on TR 752 in Gallia County, Ohio. The bridge, located at GAL-TR 752-0.29, is a steel pony truss simple span with a corrugated steel plate deck. The current bridge will be replaced with a similar type of bridge. The project is design build. The existing structure (SFN 2743531) over Symmes Creek has a sufficiency rating of 21.7 SD and the general appraisal rating is 4. No new right-of-way will be needed for the project. No homes or businesses will be removed by the project. The project is located in a rural area in Walnut Township of Gallia County. Symmes Creek is a perennial stream that is in the Ohio River drainage basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / Rules and Regulations
    7910 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 28 / Friday, February 10, 1995 / Rules and Regulations (b) Effective Dates. This section published for this regulation and good Symmes Creek, and adjacent landside becomes effective on January 30, 1995 cause exists for making it effective in areas in proximity to the blast site will and will terminate on March 31, 1995. less than 30 days after Federal Register be subject to periodic closures. No (c) Regualtions. The general publication. Following normal vessels will be allowed to transit either regulations under § 165.23 which rulemaking procedures would have waterway when blasting and steel prohibit entry into the described zone been impracticable. Specifically, removal operations will affect safe without the authority of the Captain of anticipated demolition operations, navigation. Additionally, local law the Port, St. Louis, apply. including explosive detonations, as part enforcement officials will secure Dated: January 25, 1995. of a bridge removal project at mile landside areas as appropriate to 308.7, Ohio River, Huntington, West safeguard the general public from the S.P. Cooper, Virginia, have created a situation which explosive hazard during detonations. Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the presents an immediate hazard to Notification of river and creek closure Port, St. Louis, Missouri. navigation, life, and property. As a will be made via Broadcast Notice to [FR Doc. 95±3431 Filed 2±9±95; 8:45 am] result, the Coast Guard deems it to be in Mariners at periods 24 hours, 2 hours, BILLING CODE 4910±14±M the public's best interest to issue a and 5 minutes prior to each blast.
    [Show full text]