Does High-Speed Rail Influence Urban Dynamics and Land Pricing?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Link Real Estate Investment Trust
The Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this announcement, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this announcement. Link Real Estate Investment Trust (a collective investment scheme authorised under section 104 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Chapter 571 of the Laws of Hong Kong)) (stock code: 823) ACQUISITION OF 50% INTEREST IN PRC PROPERTY QIBAO VANKE PLAZA The Board is pleased to announce that pursuant to the Framework Agreement and ETA dated 24 February 2021, Link (through the Buyer) has agreed to acquire the Equity Interest from the Seller. The Equity Interest represents 50% of the equity interest of the Target Company. Upon Completion, Link will through its ownership of the Equity Interest become the joint owner with the Other Shareholder, which holds the remaining 50% of the equity interest, of the Target Company. The Buyer has entered into the Joint Venture Agreement (which will take effect on the Completion Date) with the Other Shareholder to govern the relationship between the Buyer and the Other Shareholder as shareholders of the Target Company. The Target Company is the sole owner of the Property known as 七寶萬科廣場 (Qibao Vanke Plaza) located at 5/3 Qiu, 620 Block, Qibao Town, Minhang District, Shanghai, the PRC (中國上海市閔行區七寶鎮620街坊5/3丘). The Property is a 5-storey commercial development plus a 3-storey basement, together comprising a retail area of approximately 148,852.84 sqm offering shopping, leisure, tourism, dining, entertainment and cultural experiences and a car park with 1,471 parking spaces. -
Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks -
Intercity Bus Transportation System and Its Competition in Malaysia
Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol.8, 2011 Intercity Bus Transportation System and its competition in Malaysia Bayu Martanto ADJI Angelalia ROZA PhD Candidate Masters Candidate Center for Transportation Research Center for Transportation Research Faculty of Engineering Faculty of Engineering University of Malaya University of Malaya 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Fax: +603-79552182 Fax: +603-79552182 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Raja Syahira RAJA ABDUL AZIZ Mohamed Rehan KARIM Masters Candidate Professor Center for Transportation Research Center for Transportation Research Faculty of Engineering Faculty of Engineering University of Malaya University of Malaya 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Fax: +603-79552182 Fax: +603-79552182 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Abstract : Intercity transportation in Malaysia is quite similar to other countries, which involve three kinds of modes, namely, bus, rail and air. Among these modes, bus transportation continues to be the top choice for intercity travelers in Malaysia. Bus offers more flexibility compared to the other transport modes. Due to its relatively cheaper fare as compared to the air transport, bus is more affordable to those with low income. However, bus transport service today is starting to face higher competition from rail and air transport due to their attractive factors. The huge challenge faced by intercity bus transport in Malaysia is the management of its services. The intercity bus transport does not fall under one management; unlike rail transport which is managed under Keretapi Tanah Melayu Berhad (KTMB), or air transport which is managed under Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad (MAHB). -
A Case Study of the Kyushu Shinkansen Tsubame
Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol.8, 2011 Design Strategy for Interior Space in High Speed Rail: A Case Study of the Kyushu Shinkansen Tsubame Michie MASUBUCHI Seiji IWAKURA Dept. of Urban Development Professor Utsunomiya city Civil Engineering 1-1-5 Asahi Utsunomiya city, Tochigi Shibaura Institute of Technology 320-8540 Japan 1-7-5, Toyosu,Kouto-ku,Tokyo E-mail: [email protected] 135-8548, Japan Fax: +81-3-5859-8401 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: This report focuses on the design strategy for interior space in the Shinkansen Tsubame Series 800 in Kyusyu, Japan and describes the challenges and solutions as obtained from an interview survey of the companies engaged in producing the products used in the train. With regard to construction of the Tsubame Series 800 trains, the companies involved encountered many challenges. The following two solutions contributed greatly to overcoming these challenges: 1)The “building up experiences” were used effectively, including the continuous improvements made in technologies, the effective use of knowledge accumulated in departments in the companies other than those directly related to product production, and the contributions of their research laboratories. 2)A flexible production system was established, including the accumulated experiences and knowledge mutually shared by other related departments in the companies, and the manual assembly processes added to the automatic production lines. Key Words: High Speed Rail, Interior Design Strategy, Interview Survey 1. INTORODUCTION In 2004, the Kyushu Shinkansen railway train Tsubame (Swallow) Series 800 started operation. This is the first train that ran on the Shinkansen railway line in the Kyushu region. -
Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States
Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM 136763_Cover.indd 1 3/22/13 7:38 AM Parsons Brinckerhoff 2010 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Monograph 26 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the United States Fellow: Francis P. Banko Professional Associate Principal Project Manager Lead Investigator: Jackson H. Xue Rail Vehicle Engineer December 2012 First Printing 2013 Copyright © 2013, Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, mechanical (including photocopying), recording, taping, or information or retrieval systems—without permission of the pub- lisher. Published by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Group Inc. One Penn Plaza New York, New York 10119 Graphics Database: V212 CONTENTS FOREWORD XV PREFACE XVII PART 1: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE RESEARCH 3 1.1 Unprecedented Support for High Speed Rail in the U.S. ....................3 1.2 Pioneering the Application of High Speed Rail Express Trainsets in the U.S. .....4 1.3 Research Objectives . 6 1.4 William Barclay Parsons Fellowship Participants ...........................6 1.5 Host Manufacturers and Operators......................................7 1.6 A Snapshot in Time .................................................10 CHAPTER 2 HOST MANUFACTURERS AND OPERATORS, THEIR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES 11 2.1 Overview . 11 2.2 Introduction to Host HSR Manufacturers . 11 2.3 Introduction to Host HSR Operators and Regulatory Agencies . -
A Comparative Analysis of High-Speed Rail Station Development Into Destination and Multi-Use Facilities: the Case of San Jose Diridon
MTI A Comparative Analysis of Funded by U.S. Department of Services Transit Census California of Water 2012 High-Speed Rail Station Transportation and California Department of Transportation Development into Destination and Multi-Use Facilities: The Case of San Jose Diridon MTI ReportMTI 12-02 December 2012 MTI Report 12-75 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER LEAD UNIVERSITY OF MNTRC Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) was established by Congress in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation MTI/MNTRC BOARD OF TRUSTEES Equity Act (ISTEA) and was reauthorized under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century (TEA-21). MTI then successfully competed to be named a Tier 1 Center in 2002 and 2006 in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Founder, Honorable Norman Joseph Boardman (Ex-Officio) Diane Woodend Jones (TE 2019) Richard A. White (Ex-Officio) Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). Most recently, MTI successfully competed in the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011 to Mineta (Ex-Officio) Chief Executive Officer Principal and Chair of Board Interim President and CEO be named a Tier 1 Transit-Focused University Transportation Center. The Institute is funded by Congress through the United States Secretary (ret.), US Department of Amtrak Lea+Elliot, Inc. American Public Transportation Transportation Association (APTA) Department of Transportation’s Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Vice Chair -
Major Development Properties
1 SHANGHAI INDUSTRIAL HOLDINGS LIMITED Set out below is a summary of the major property development projects of the Group as at 31 December 2016: Major Development Properties Pre-sold Interest Approximate Planned during Total attributable site area total GFA the year GFA sold Expected Projects of SI Type of to SI (square (square (square (square date of City Development property Development meters) meters) meters) meters) completion 1 Kaifu District, Fengsheng Residential and 90% 5,468 70,566 7,542 – Completed Changsha Building commercial 2 Chenghua District, Hi-Shanghai Commercial and 100% 61,506 254,885 75,441 151,644 Completed Chengdu residential 3 Beibei District, Hi-Shanghai Residential and 100% 30,845 74,935 20,092 – 2019 Chongqing commercial 4 Yuhang District, Hi-Shanghai Residential and 85% 74,864 230,484 81,104 – 2019 Hangzhou (Phase I) commercial 5 Yuhang District, Hi-Shanghai Residential and 85% 59,640 198,203 – – 2019 Hangzhou (Phase II) commercial 6 Wuxing District, Shanghai Bay Residential 100% 85,555 96,085 42,236 76,966 Completed Huzhou 7 Wuxing District, SIIC Garden Hotel Hotel and 100% 116,458 47,177 – – Completed Huzhou commercial 8 Wuxing District, Hurun Commercial Commercial 100% 13,661 27,322 – – Under Huzhou Plaza planning 9 Shilaoren National International Beer Composite 100% 227,675 783,500 58,387 262,459 2014 to 2018, Tourist Resort, City in phases Qingdao 10 Fengze District, Sea Palace Residential and 49% 381,795 1,670,032 71,225 – 2017 to 2021, Quanzhou commercial in phases 11 Changning District, United 88 Residential -
Shinkansen - Bullet Train
Shinkansen - Bullet Train Sea of Japan Shin-Aomori Hachinohe Akita Shinkansen Akita Morioka Yamagata Shinkansen Shinjyo Tohoku Shinkansen Yamagata Joetsu Shinkansen Sendai Niigata Fukushima North Pacific Ocean Hokuriku Shinkansen Nagano Takasaki Sanyo Shinkansen Omiya Tokyo Kyoto Nagoya Okayama Shin-Yokohama Hiroshima Kokura Shin-osaka Hakata Tokaido Shinkansen Kumamoto Kyushu Shinkansen Kagoshima-chuo Source: Based on websites of MLIT Japan (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism) and railway companies in Japan As of July 2014 The high-speed Shinkansen trail over 2,663 km connects the major cities throughout Japan. The safe and punctual public transportation system including trains and buses is convenient to move around in Japan. < Move between major cities > (approximate travel time) Tokyo to: Shin-Aomori (3 hours and 10 minutes) Akita (3 hours and 50 minutes) Niigata (2 hours and 23 minutes) Nagano (1 hours and 55 minutes) Shin-Osaka (2 hours and 38 minutes) Hakata (5 hours and 28 minutes) Shin-Osaka to: Nagoya (53 minutes) Hiroshima (1 hours and 34 minutes) Hakata (2 hours and 48 minutes) Hakata to: Kaghoshima-chuo (1 hours and 42 minutes) This document is owned or licensed by JETRO and providers of the information content. This document shall not be reproduced or reprinted on any medium or registered on any search system in whole or part by any means, without prior permission of JETRO. Although JETRO makes its best efforts to ensure the correctness of the information contained in Copyright (C) 2014 Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO). All rights reserved. this document, JETRO does not take any responsibility regarding losses derived from the information contained in this document. -
Rail Station Usage in Wales, 2018-19
Rail station usage in Wales, 2018-19 19 February 2020 SB 5/2020 About this bulletin Summary This bulletin reports on There was a 9.4 per cent increase in the number of station entries and exits the usage of rail stations in Wales in 2018-19 compared with the previous year, the largest year on in Wales. Information year percentage increase since 2007-08. (Table 1). covers stations in Wales from 2004-05 to 2018-19 A number of factors are likely to have contributed to this increase. During this and the UK for 2018-19. period the Wales and Borders rail franchise changed from Arriva Trains The bulletin is based on Wales to Transport for Wales (TfW), although TfW did not make any the annual station usage significant timetable changes until after 2018-19. report published by the Most of the largest increases in 2018-19 occurred in South East Wales, Office of Rail and Road especially on the City Line in Cardiff, and at stations on the Valleys Line close (ORR). This report to or in Cardiff. Between the year ending March 2018 and March 2019, the includes a spreadsheet level of employment in Cardiff increased by over 13,000 people. which gives estimated The number of station entries and exits in Wales has risen every year since station entries and station 2004-05, and by 75 per cent over that period. exits based on ticket sales for each station on Cardiff Central remains the busiest station in Wales with 25 per cent of all the UK rail network. -
Improving Rail Station Access in Australia
Improving Rail Station Access in Australia CRC for Rail Innovation [insert date] Page i Improving Rail Station Access in Australia DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Document: CRC for Rail Innovation Old Central Station, 290 Ann St. Title: Improving Rail Station Access in Australia Brisbane Qld 4000 Project Leader: Phil Charles GPO Box 1422 Brisbane Qld 4001 Authors: Ronald Galiza and Phil Charles Tel: +61 7 3221 2536 Project No.: R1.133 Fax: +61 7 3235 2987 Project Name: Station Access www.railcrc.net.au Synopsis: This document on improving rail station access in Australia is the main document for the CRC project on Station Access. The document reviews Australian and international planning guides to identify key elements important in planning for station access. Best practice elements were identified for inclusion in an access planning methodology for the Australian context. An evaluation framework featuring a checklist of station access principles associated with each access mode is provided to assess existing station access. Case studies are presented from Brisbane, Perth, and Sydney so as to illustrate the framework. This document presents a new perspective for Australian rail agencies, including access in the overall design process and provides a best practice approach, building on available station access-related planning in Australia and developments in Europe and North America. REVISION/CHECKING HISTORY REVISION DATE ACADEMIC REVIEW INDUSTRY REVIEW APPROVAL NUMBER (PROGRAM LEADER) (PROJECT CHAIR) (RESEARCH DIRECTOR) 0 23 September 2013 DISTRIBUTION REVISION DESTINATION 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Industry x Participant for Review Established and supported under the Australian Government’s cooperative Research Centres Programme Copyright © 2013 This work is copyright. -
Set out Below Is a Summary of the Major Property Development Projects of the Group As at 31 December 2019: Major Development
1 Set out below is a summary of the major property development projects of the Group as at 31 December 2019: Major Development Properties Pre-sold Interest Approximate Planned during Total attributable site area total GFA the year GFA sold Expected Projects of Type of to SI (square (square (square (square date of City SI Development property Development meters) meters) meters) meters) completion 1 Kaifu District, Fengsheng Building Residential and 90% 5,468 70,566 6,627 30,870 Completed Changsha commercial 2 Chenghua District, Hi-Shanghai Residential and 100% 61,506 254,885 4,996 190,153 Completed Chengdu commercial 3 Beibei District, Hi-Shanghai Residential and 100% 30,845 74,935 3,301 57,626 Completed Chongqing commercial 4 Yuhang District, Hi-Shanghai (Phase I) Residential and 85% 74,864 230,484 27,758 150,289 Completed Hangzhou commercial 5 Yuhang District, Hi-Shanghai (Phase II) Residential and 85% 59,640 198,203 56,539 – Completed Hangzhou commercial 6 Wuxing District, SIIC Garden Hotel Hotel and 100% 116,458 47,177 – – Completed Huzhou commercial 7 Wuxing District, Hurun Commercial Commercial 100% 13,661 27,322 – – Under Huzhou Plaza planning 8 Wuxing District, SIIC Tianlan Bay Residential and 100% 115,647 193,292 26,042 – Completed Huzhou commercial 9 Wuxing District, SIIC Yungjing Bay Residential 100% 68,471 207,906 28,953 – 2020 Huzhou 10 Shilaoren National International Beer City Composite 100% 227,675 806,339 – 333,798 2014 to 2022, Tourist Resort, Qingdao in phases 11 Fengze District, Sea Palace Residential and 100% 170,133 -
Why Some Airport-Rail Links Get Built and Others Do Not: the Role of Institutions, Equity and Financing
Why some airport-rail links get built and others do not: the role of institutions, equity and financing by Julia Nickel S.M. in Engineering Systems- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010 Vordiplom in Wirtschaftsingenieurwesen- Universität Karlsruhe, 2007 Submitted to the Department of Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Political Science at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 2011 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2011. All rights reserved. Author . Department of Political Science October 12, 2010 Certified by . Kenneth Oye Associate Professor of Political Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Roger Peterson Arthur and Ruth Sloan Professor of Political Science Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 Why some airport-rail links get built and others do not: the role of institutions, equity and financing by Julia Nickel Submitted to the Department of Political Science On October 12, 2010, in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Political Science Abstract The thesis seeks to provide an understanding of reasons for different outcomes of airport ground access projects. Five in-depth case studies (Hongkong, Tokyo-Narita, London- Heathrow, Chicago- O’Hare and Paris-Charles de Gaulle) and eight smaller case studies (Kuala Lumpur, Seoul, Shanghai-Pudong, Bangkok, Beijing, Rome- Fiumicino, Istanbul-Atatürk and Munich- Franz Josef Strauss) are conducted. The thesis builds on existing literature that compares airport-rail links by explicitly considering the influence of the institutional environment of an airport on its ground access situation and by paying special attention to recently opened dedicated airport expresses in Asia.