Viral Dsrna and Killer System in Saccharomyces Paradoxus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Viral Dsrna and Killer System in Saccharomyces Paradoxus Viral dsRNA and Killer System in Saccharomyces Paradoxus Mahsan Nematbakhsh A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Imperial College London Department of Life Sciences Faculty of Natural Sciences Imperial College London June 2016 1 DECLARATION I certify that this thesis represents my own work, unless otherwise stated. All external contributions and any information derived from other sources have been acknowledged accordingly. MAHSAN NEMATBAKHSH The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives licence. Researchers are free to copy, distribute or transmit the thesis on the condition that they attribute it, that they do not use it for commercial purposes and that they do not alter, transform or build upon it. For any reuse or redistribution, researchers must make clear to others the licence terms of this work. 2 In loving memory of my late grandfathers, Mirza Mahmoud Amin and Fatolah Nematbakhsh… Dedicated to my loving husband Meysam, my wonderful son Ali and my darling daughter Layli, who are all so full of life; without them my PhD journey would not have been possible. Dedicated to my mom & dad Sima and Masoud, the most precious gift in my life: for their endless support, love and encouragement throughout my life. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Professor Austin Burt for accepting me onto his research team and for all his patience and valuable inputs to successfully drive this project forward. I would like also to thank my co-supervisor, Professor Tony Cass and Dr. Vassiliki Koufopanou for their continued support and guidance throughout the project. Thank you to colleagues, past and present, particularly Dr. Muthu and Ms. Susan Lomas for their continued support and encouragement throughout my tenure. Finally, a very special thank you to my family members, relatives and friends for being there for me. Last but not least, to the Almighty God for giving me the strength and perseverance to complete my studies within the stipulated time frame and for keeping me surrounded by these wonderful people. 4 Abstract Some yeast strains (killer strains) release killer toxins which kill other strains of the same or different species of yeast but not the strain producing the toxin itself. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, killer toxins are encoded by either dsRNA viruses or nuclear genes. This study aims to characterise the genetic basis of the killer toxin synthesised in Saccharomyces paradoxus, a wild non-domesticated relative of S. cerevisiae. One hundred and nine stains of S. paradoxus gathered from Silwood Park, Continental Europe, Far East, and North America were screened for the killer-immune phenotype against killer and sensitive yeast strains. In order to find whether the killer toxin is encoded by dsRNA or a nuclear gene, the killer strains were treated by cyclohexamide that removes the dsRNA which carries the killer toxin gene. The strains were also screened for presence and absence of dsRNA by directly visualising the dsRNA on the agarose gel and also by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). Several strains were found to have the killer phenotype (30% of the screened strains). In the majority of killer strains the toxins were encoded by dsRNA except the strains from Canada and one strain from continental Europe, which seems to have other genetic bases. Sixteen full sequences of large dsRNA variants (L-A; with the length of about 4.5 kb) composed of L-A-Q, L-A-D1, L-A-C, L-A- P1.1, L-A-P1.2, L-A-P1.3, L-A-P1.4, L-A-P1.5, L-A-P1.6, L-A-P1.7, L-A-P2.1, L-A-P2.2, L-A-P2.3, L-A-P2.4, L-A-P2.5, and L-A-P2.6, and seven new types of medium size dsRNA (M; with the length between 0.8 and 2kb) composed of MQ, MC, M-P1G1, M-P1G2, M-P1G3-1, M-P1G3-2, M-P1G5, and M-P1SG, have been identified in this study. M28 was the only M dsRNA in S. paradoxus which was nearly identical to the M28 from S. cerevisiae; therefore likely to have been transferred between the two species. To test whether the killer toxins were encoded from the new types of M dsRNAs, the MQ ORF sequence from S. paradoxus was cloned and expressed into S. cerevisiae and then tested for the killer phenotype. The S. paradoxus MQ protein was successfully expressed in the S. cerevisiae strain and a positive killer response in the killer assay confirmed its function as a killer toxin. 5 List of Tables Table 1-1. Characterisation of dsRNA mycovirus families (Fauquet et al., 2005) 17 Table 1-2. The characterisation of the species in Totivirus genus (Dinman et al., 1991, Kang et al., 2001, Kondo et al., 2016, Fauquet et al., 2005, Li et al., 2011). 18 Table 1-3. The genetic basis of the killer toxins in S. cerevisiae (Goto et al., 1991, Goto et al., 1990a, Rodríguez-Cousiño et al., 2011, SCHMITT and TIPPER, 1995, Magliani et al., 1997b) 23 Table 1-4. The genetic basis of killer phenotype in yeast species 24 Table 1-5. Reported dsRNA and killer activity in Saccharomyces species (Ivannikova et al., 2007, Naumov et al., 2005, Naumov et al., 2009) 25 Table 2-1. The killer-immune phenotype of yeast strains against the S. cerevisiae sensitive strain, M894, S. cerevisiae killer strains, K1 (K1 617), K2 (K2 618), and K28 (MS 300), and the S. paradoxus non-killer strains, CBS 8437, T18.2, A33. SDT and DDT represent Same-Day-Test and Different-Day-Test spraying of the immune tester and K, PK, VPK and (-) represent Killer, Poor Killer, Very poor and non-killer, respectively. 39 Table 2-2. The effect of ethanol on the killer activity of the three S. paradoxus strains, O62.5, T21.4, and Y8.5, and the concentrated medium that contains Q62.5 killer toxin; K (Killer), PK (Poor Killer), VPK (Very Poor Killer), VVPK (Very Very Poor Killer) and (-) non-killer. 42 Table 3-1. Summary of the results of killer assay, dsRNA extraction of S. paradoxus strains and S1 nuclease treatment of the dsRNA. ”K” is the abbreviation of killer and “-“ means it is not killer. 57 Table 3-2. The distribution of dsRNAs and killer phenotypes in S. paradoxus strains from four different regions. The columns show: the total number of strains, dsRNA⁺; the number of strains containing dsRNA, dsRNA⁺ K⁺; the number of strains carrying dsRNA and showing the killer phenotype, dsRNA⁺ K⁻ the number of strains carrying dsRNA and not showing the killer phenotype and dsRNA⁻ K⁺ the number of strains that do not have dsRNA but show the killer phenotype. 61 Table 3-3. The cyclohexamide treatment of S.paradoxus killer strains. Both the Same-Day-Test (SDT) and Different-Day-Test (DDT)were performed to test the killer phenotype of the strains before and after the cycloheximide treatment. The presence of L and M dsRNA checked by dsRNA extraction and running on the gel. C1, C2, and C3 are the three clones from each cyclohexamide treated strain which their killer phenotype was tested. Only CECT10176 strain, which does not carry any dsRNA, did not lose its killer phenotype, after cycloheximide treatment. In the rest of the killer strains, minimum one clone became non – Killer after cyclohexamide treatment. dsRNA extraction of the non – killer clones indicated that, M dsRNA is removed from all the non-killer clones. K, NK, PK and VPK are the abbreviations of Killer, Non-killer, Poor Killer and Very poor respectively. “+” and “-“indicate the presence and absent of the mentioned dsRNA in each column in each strain. 62 Table 4-1. The results of killer assay, the gel electrophoresis of dsRNA extraction and dsRNA sequencing of Q62.5, DBVPG4650 and CBS8441. 74 Table 4-2. The viral dsRNAs reported in S. cerevisiae (Icho and Wickner, 1989b, Rodríguez-Cousiño et al., 2013, Russell et al., 1997, Meskauskas, 1990, SCHMITT and TIPPER, 1995, Rodríguez-Cousiño et al., 2011, PARK et al., 1996, Esteban et al., 1992b, Rodriguez-Cousiño et al., 1991) and S. paradoxus (Chang et al., 2015), and those found in S. paradoxus in this study. (C) is the abbreviation of Coding and (NC) is the abbreviation of Non-Coding parts of M. In terms of L, all the L-A found in this study contain full sequences of L-A except L-A-P1-g1 and L-A-P1-p1, which contained only gag and pol genes. 75 Table 4-3. The nucleic acid and amino identities between the different types of L-A dsRNA in S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. The numbers on the top that are marked with the blue lines are nucleic acid identities and the numbers at the bottom marked with green lines are amino acid identities. Based on the identities between different L-A and their phylogeny tree, there are three groups of dsRNA in the S. paradoxus strains. 77 Table 4-4. The result of the prediction of the structure of the new M dsRNAs and their preprotoxins 83 6 Table 8-1. The killer phenotype of S. paradoxus strains. 119 Table 8-2. Media (1L): 121 Table 8-3. The list of the strains in each library of NGS. 122 Table 8-4. The insertion size, number of reads after pairing the reads in each library and the percentage of reads mapped to nuclear and mitochondrial genome with and without considering MMQ200. 124 Table 8-5.
Recommended publications
  • Killer Toxin of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Y500-4L Active Against Fleischmann and Itaiquara Commercial Brands of Yeast
    Revista de Microbiologia (1999) 30:253-257 Killer toxin of S. cerevisiae ISSN 0001-3714 KILLER TOXIN OF SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE Y500-4L ACTIVE AGAINST FLEISCHMANN AND ITAIQUARA COMMERCIAL BRANDS OF YEAST Giselle A.M. Soares*; Hélia H. Sato Departamento de Ciência de Alimentos, Faculdade de Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil Submitted: October 02, 1998; Returned to authors for corrections: March 03, 1999; Approved: May 11, 1999 ABSTRACT The strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y500-4L, previously selected from the must of alcohol producing plants and showing high fermentative and killer capacities, was characterized according to the interactions between the yeasts and examined for curing and detection of dsRNA plasmids, which code for the killer character. The killer yeast S. cerevisiae Y500-4L showed considerable killer activity against the Fleischmann and Itaiquara commercial brands of yeast and also against the standard killer yeasts K2 (S. diastaticus NCYC 713), K4 (Candida glabrata NCYC 388) and K11 (Torulopsis glabrata ATCC 15126). However S. cerevisiae Y500-4L showed sensitivity to the killer toxin produced by the standard killer yeasts K8 (Hansenula anomala NCYC 435), K9 (Hansenula mrakii NCYC 500), K10 (Kluyveromyces drosophilarum NCYC 575) and K11 (Torulopsis glabrata ATCC 15126). No M-dsRNA plasmid was detected in the S. cerevisiae Y500-4L strain and these results suggest that the genetic basis for toxin production is encoded by chromosomal DNA. The strain S. cerevisiae Y500-4L was more resistant to the loss of the phenotype killer with cycloheximide and incubation at elevated temperatures (40oC) than the standard killer yeast S. cerevisiae K1.
    [Show full text]
  • (Vles) in the Yeast Debaryomyces Hansenii
    toxins Article New Cytoplasmic Virus-Like Elements (VLEs) in the Yeast Debaryomyces hansenii Xymena Połomska 1,* ,Cécile Neuvéglise 2, Joanna Zyzak 3, Barbara Zarowska˙ 1, Serge Casaregola 4 and Zbigniew Lazar 1 1 Department of Biotechnology and Food Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Science, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences (WUELS), 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected] (B.Z.);˙ [email protected] (Z.L.) 2 SPO, INRAE, Montpellier SupAgro, Université de Montpellier, 34060 Montpellier, France; [email protected] 3 Department of Microbiology, Laboratory of Microbiome Immunobiology, Ludwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, 53-114 Wroclaw, Poland; [email protected] 4 INRAE, AgroParisTech, Micalis Institute, CIRM-Levures, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-71-3207-791 Abstract: Yeasts can have additional genetic information in the form of cytoplasmic linear dsDNA molecules called virus-like elements (VLEs). Some of them encode killer toxins. The aim of this work was to investigate the prevalence of such elements in D. hansenii killer yeast deposited in culture collections as well as in strains freshly isolated from blue cheeses. Possible benefits to the host from harboring such VLEs were analyzed. VLEs occurred frequently among fresh D. hansenii isolates (15/60 strains), as opposed to strains obtained from culture collections (0/75 strains). Eight new different systems were identified: four composed of two elements and four of three elements. Full sequences of three new VLE systems obtained by NGS revealed extremely high conservation Citation: Połomska, X.; Neuvéglise, among the largest molecules in these systems except for one ORF, probably encoding a protein C.; Zyzak, J.; Zarowska,˙ B.; resembling immunity determinant to killer toxins of VLE origin in other yeast species.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nucleic Acid Associated with a Killer Strain of Yeast (Double-Stranded RNA/Cesium Sulfate)
    Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 70, No. 4, pp. 1069-1072, April 1973 A Nucleic Acid Associated with a Killer Strain of Yeast (double-stranded RNA/cesium sulfate) MICHAEL H. VODKIN AND GERALD R. FINK Section of Genetics, Development, and Physiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850 Communicated by Adrian M. Srb, January 26, 1973 ABSTRACT A crude membrane fraction was isolated 1 mCi of [8-'H]adenine was added, and the culture was in- from both killer M(k) and isogenic nonkiller M(o) strains cubated at 300 for 16-18 hr (24-27 hr for p- strain) in a of yeast labeled with [3H]adenine. Nucleic acids were ex- tracted from this fraction and centrifuged to equilibrium gyrotory shaker. in an ethidium bromide-Cs2SO4 solution. A peak of radio- activity coincident with a single fluorescent band was Nucleic Acid Extraction and EtBr-Cs2SO4 Centrifugation. present in the membrane fraction isolated from cells of By the procedure of Clark-Walker (4), a crude membrane the killer strain but was absent from that isolated from fraction was obtained from 25-40 g of yeast broken in a nonkiller cells. This material has been characterized as Braun homogenizer. EtBr at a concentration of 500 ag/ml double-stranded RNA by treatment with various nucleases The and by chromatography on a cellulose CF-li column. was present in all buffers used during the isolation. pellet Sedimentation in a sucrose gradient indicates an S value was lysed in 2.5 ml of 1% Brij 35. To the lysate was added 0.5 of 8-10.
    [Show full text]
  • Scent of a Killer: How Could Killer Yeast Boost Its Dispersal?
    Received: 9 March 2021 | Accepted: 17 March 2021 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7534 NATURE NOTES Scent of a killer: How could killer yeast boost its dispersal? Claudia C. Buser1,2 | Jukka Jokela1,2 | Oliver Y. Martin1,3 1Institute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland Abstract 2Department of Aquatic Ecology, Eawag, Vector- borne parasites often manipulate hosts to attract uninfected vectors. For Dübendorf, Switzerland example, parasites causing malaria alter host odor to attract mosquitoes. Here, we 3Department of Biology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland discuss the ecology and evolution of fruit- colonizing yeast in a tripartite symbiosis— the so- called “killer yeast” system. “Killer yeast” consists of Saccharomyces cerevi- Correspondence Claudia C. Buser, Dep. Environmental siae yeast hosting two double- stranded RNA viruses (M satellite dsRNAs, L- A dsRNA Sciences, ETH, Überlandstrasse 133, 8309 helper virus). When both dsRNA viruses occur in a yeast cell, the yeast converts to Dübendorf, Switzerland. Email: [email protected] lethal toxin-producing “killer yeast” phenotype that kills uninfected yeasts. Yeasts on ephemeral fruits attract insect vectors to colonize new habitats. As the viruses Funding information ETH Research, Grant/Award Number: ETH- have no extracellular stage, they depend on the same insect vectors as yeast for 23 20- 1; Association for the Study of Animal their dispersal. Viruses also benefit from yeast dispersal as this promotes yeast to Behavior reproduce sexually, which is how viruses can transmit to uninfected yeast strains. We tested whether insect vectors are more attracted to killer yeasts than to non-killer yeasts. In our field experiment, we found that killer yeasts were more attractive to Drosophila than non- killer yeasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Protease B of the Lysosomelike Vacuole of the Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Is Homologous to the Subtilisin Family of Serine Proteases CHARLES M
    MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, Dec. 1987, p. 4390-4399 Vol. 7, No. 12 0270-7306/87/124390-10$02.00/0 Copyright © 1987, American Society for Microbiology Protease B of the Lysosomelike Vacuole of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Homologous to the Subtilisin Family of Serine Proteases CHARLES M. MOEHLE,1* RICHARD TIZARD,2 SANDRA K. LEMMON,1 JOHN SMART,2 AND ELIZABETH W. JONES1 Department ofBiological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213,1 and Biogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts 021422 Received 22 May 1987/Accepted 2 September 1987 The PRB1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes the vacuolar endoprotease protease B. We have determined the DNA sequence of the PRBI gene and the amino acid sequence of the amino terminus of mature protease B. The deduced amino acid sequence of this serine protease shares extensive homology with those of subtilisin, proteinase K, and related proteases. The open reading frame of PRB1 consists of 635 codons and, therefore, encodes a very large protein (molecular weight, >69,000) relative to the observed size of mature protease B (molecular weight, 33,000). Examination of the gene sequence, the determined amino-terminal sequence, and empirical molecular weight determinations suggests that the preproenzyme must be processed at both amino and carboxy termini and that asparagine-linked glycosylation occurs at an unusual tripeptide acceptor sequence. The lysosomelike vacuole of the yeast Saccharomyces carbohydrate is not Asn linked and may be linked to cerevisiae contains a number of the major hydrolases of the hydroxyl groups (see reference 5 for a review). cell, including protease A, protease B, carboxypeptidase Y, We have recently isolated the structural gene for protease the large aminopeptidase, repressible alkaline phosphatase, B, PRBI, and have described its transcription pattern (47).
    [Show full text]
  • In Killer Strains of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
    TWO CHROMOSOMAL GENES REQUIRED FOR KILLING EXPRESSION IN KILLER STRAINS OF SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE REED B. WICKNER AND MICHAEL J. LEIBOWITZ’ Laboratory of Biochemical Pharmacology, National Institute of Arthritis, Metabolism, and Digestive Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20014 Manuscript received September 15, 1975 ABSTRACT The killer character of yeast is determined by a 1.4 x 106 molecular weight double-stranded RNA plasmid and at least 12 chromosomal genes. Wild-type strains of yeast that carry this plasmid (killers) secrete a toxin which is lethal only to strains not carrying this plasmid (sensitives). -__ We have isolated 28 independent recessive chromosomal mutants of a killer strain that have lost the ability to secrete an active toxin but remain resistant to the effects of the toxin and continue to carry the complete cytoplasmic killer genome. These mutants define two complementation groups, ked and kex2. Kexl is located on chromosome VIZ between ade5 and lys5. Kex2 is located on chromosome XIV, but it does not show meiotic linkage to any gene previously located on this chromosome. __ When the killer plasmid of kexl or kex2 strains is elimi- nated by curing with heat or cycloheximide, the strains become sensitive to killing. The mutant phenotype reappears among the meiotic segregants in a cross with a normal killer. Thus, the kex phenotype does not require an alteration of the killer plasmid. --- Kexl and kex2 strains each contain near-normal levels of the 1.4 x 106 molecular weight double-stranded RNA, whose presence is correlated with the presence of the killer genome. CERTAIN strains of Saccharomyces cereuisiae (called killers) secrete a pro- tein which kills other strains (called sensitives) (MAKOWERand BEVAN 1963; WOODSand BEVAN1968; BUSSEY1972).
    [Show full text]
  • The Species-Specific Acquisition and Diversification of a Novel Family Of
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.05.322909; this version posted October 7, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 The Species-specific Acquisition and Diversification of a Novel 2 Family of Killer Toxins in Budding Yeasts of the Saccharomycotina. 3 4 Lance R. Fredericks1, Mark D. Lee1, Angela M. Crabtree1, Josephine M. Boyer1, Emily A. Kizer1, Nathan T. 5 Taggart1, Samuel S. Hunter2#, Courtney B. Kennedy1, Cody G. Willmore1, Nova M. Tebbe1, Jade S. Harris1, 6 Sarah N. Brocke1, Paul A. Rowley1* 7 8 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA 9 2iBEST Genomics Core, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843, USA 10 #currently at University of California Davis Genome Center, University of California, Davis, 451 Health Sciences Dr., Davis, CA 11 95616 12 *Correspondence: [email protected] 13 14 Abstract 15 Killer toxins are extracellular antifungal proteins that are produced by a wide variety of fungi, 16 including Saccharomyces yeasts. Although many Saccharomyces killer toxins have been 17 previously identified, their evolutionary origins remain uncertain given that many of the se genes 18 have been mobilized by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) viruses. A survey of yeasts from the 19 Saccharomyces genus has identified a novel killer toxin with a unique spectrum of activity 20 produced by Saccharomyces paradoxus. The expression of this novel killer toxin is associated 21 with the presence of a dsRNA totivirus and a satellite dsRNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Killer Factor in Wine Yeasts and Its Effect on Fermentation H.G
    Killer Factor in Wine Yeasts and its Effect on Fermentation H.G. Tredoux, R.P. Tracey and A. Tromp Viticultural and Oenological Research Institute, Private Bag X5026, 7600, Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa. Submitted for publication: July 1986 Accepted for publication: September 1986 Keywords: Killer factor, yeast strain, fermentation, wine. The occurrence of killer factor amongst yeast strains in the Viti cultural and Oenological Research Institute (V 0 RI) yeast collection was studied. From a total of 96 strains, 85 were Saccharomyces cerevisiae of which 7 strains were killer, 9 neutral and 69 sensitive. These included some imported strains. On agar, no killer action was detected at wine pH. In fermentation studies using four grape cultivars, it was shown that where the killer yeast population was less than approximately 2,5% fermentation was not affected. At higher levels the killer yeast, in some instances, took over and completed fermentation, but the total fermentation time was never longer than that of the killer strain on its own. It was concluded that the use of a yeast strain should not hinge on its killer character but rather on its oenological characteristics. Killer activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was first de­ (1980) and Seki et al. (1985), is that should a fermenta­ scribed by Bevan & Makower (1963). Four phenotypes tion be inoculated with killer yeasts, it is most likely (or groups) have been shown to exist namely killer (K), that the killer yeast will dominate and complete the fer­ sensitive (S), neutral (N) and killer-sensitive (K-S) mentation. strains (Bevan & Makower, 1963; Woods, Ross & Hen­ It should be remembered, that in countries such as dry, 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • Yeast Killer Factors: Biology and Relevance in Food Biotechnology
    Yeast killer factors: Biology and relevance in food biotechnology Maja Starovič Academic internship report Msc Food technology: Food biotechnology and biorefining October 2020 Mentors: Ramón González García, Instituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino prof. dr. Eddy J. Smid, Wageningen University & Research Table of contents 1 Yeast killer toxins ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Saccharomyces cerevisiae killer system .................................................................................. 1 1.1.1 Saccharomyces cerevisiae killer toxins ............................................................................ 1 2 Non- Saccharomyces cerevisiae killer factors.................................................................................. 6 2.1 Non- Saccharomyces cerevisiae killer yeast ............................................................................ 6 2.2 Toxin entry into the target cell and the killing mechanism ..................................................... 7 2.2.1 Killer toxins from Pichia ................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1 Killer toxins from Kluyveromyces lactis ........................................................................... 8 1.2.2 Killer toxins from Candida ............................................................................................... 9 1.2.3 Killer toxins from other non-Saccharomyces yeast ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Killer Factor in Wine Yeasts and Its Effect on Fermentation H.G
    Killer Factor in Wine Yeasts and its Effect on Fermentation H.G. Tredoux, R.P. Tracey and A. Tromp Viticultural and Oenological Research Institute, Private Bag X5026, 7600, Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa. Submitted for publication: July 1986 Accepted for publication: September 1986 Keywords: Killer factor, yeast strain, fermentation, wine. The occurrence of killer factor amongst yeast strains in the Viticultural and Oenological Research Institute (VORI) yeast collection was studied. From a total of 96 strains, 85 were Saccharomyces cerevisiae of which 7 strains were killer, 9 neutral and 69 sensitive. These included some imported strains. On agar, no killer action was detected at wine pH. In fermentation studies using four grape cultivars, it was shown that where the killer yeast population was less than approximately 2,5% fermentation was not affected. At higher levels the killer yeast, in some instances, took over and completed fermentation, but the total fermentation time was never longer than that of the killer strain on its own. It was concluded that the use of a yeast strain should not hinge on its killer character but rather on its oenological characteristics. Killer activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was first de- (1980) and Seki et al. (1985), is that should a fermenta- scribed by Bevan & Makower (1963). Four phenotypes tion be inoculated with killer yeasts, it is most likely (or groups) have been shown to exist namely killer (K), that the killer yeast will dominate and complete the fer- sensitive (S), neutral (N) and killer-sensitive (K-S) mentation. strains (Bevan & Makower, 1963; Woods, Ross & Hen- It should be remembered, that in countries such as dry, 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • Saccharomyces Paradoxus K66 Killer System Evidences Expanded Assortment of Helper and Satellite Viruses
    viruses Article Saccharomyces paradoxus K66 Killer System Evidences Expanded Assortment of Helper and Satellite Viruses Igle˙ Vepštaite-Monstaviˇc˙ e˙ 1, Juliana Lukša 1 , Aleksandras Konovalovas 2, Dovile˙ Ežerskyte˙ 1, Ramune˙ Staneviˇciene˙ 1, Živile˙ Strazdaite-Žielien˙ e˙ 1, Saulius Serva 2,3,* and Elena Serviene˙ 1,3,* 1 Laboratory of Genetics, Institute of Botany, Nature Research Centre, LT-08412 Vilnius, Lithuania; [email protected] (I.V.-M.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (D.E.); [email protected] (R.S.); [email protected] (Ž.S.-Ž.) 2 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biosciences, Vilnius University, LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania; [email protected] 3 Department of Chemistry and Bioengineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (E.S.); Tel.: +370-52-72-9363 (S.S.); Tel.: +370-52-39-8244 (E.S.); Fax: +370-52-39-8231 (S.S.); Fax: +370-52-72-9352 (E.S.) Received: 28 August 2018; Accepted: 15 October 2018; Published: 16 October 2018 Abstract: The Saccharomycetaceae yeast family recently became recognized for expanding of the repertoire of different dsRNA-based viruses, highlighting the need for understanding of their cross-dependence. We isolated the Saccharomyces paradoxus AML-15-66 killer strain from spontaneous fermentation of serviceberries and identified helper and satellite viruses of the family Totiviridae, which are responsible for the killing phenotype. The corresponding full dsRNA genomes of viruses have been cloned and sequenced. Sequence analysis of SpV-LA-66 identified it to be most similar to S.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Yeast Cells Can Undergo Apoptosis • Büttner Et Al
    JCB: MINI-REVIEW Why yeast cells can undergo apoptosis: death in times of peace, love, and war Sabrina Büttner,1 Tobias Eisenberg,1 Eva Herker,2 Didac Carmona-Gutierrez,1 Guido Kroemer,3 and Frank Madeo1 1Institute of Molecular Biosciences, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria 2Gladstone Institute of Virology and Immunology, San Francisco, CA 94158 3Apoptosis, Cancer, and Immunity Unit, Institut Gustave Roussy, Faculté Paris Sud-Université, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris XI, France The purpose of apoptosis in multicellular organisms is life span, Longo et al. (1997) connected yeast aging to conserved obvious: single cells die for the benefi t of the whole mammalian apoptotic pathways. Chronologically aged yeast organism (for example, during tissue development or cells have been used as a valuable model to study oxidative dam- age and molecularly conserved aging pathways of postmitotic embryogenesis). Although apoptosis has also been tissues in higher organisms (Bitterman et al., 2003). Recently, shown in various microorganisms, the reason for this cell both replicative and chronological aging of yeast cells have been death program has remained unexplained. Recently pub- demonstrated to culminate in cell death with an apoptotic pheno- lished studies have now described yeast apoptosis during type (Laun et al., 2001; Fabrizio et al., 2004; Herker et al., 2004). aging, mating, or exposure to killer toxins (Fabrizio, P., L. In this paper, we describe physiological scenarios of yeast Battistella, R. Vardavas, C. Gattazzo, L.L. Liou, A. Diaspro, apoptosis (Fig. 2), suggesting a teleological explanation for this (at fi rst glance useless) behavior of unicellular organisms.
    [Show full text]