DOCSLIB.ORG

III. Responses to Comments (Continued)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
III. Responses to Comments (Continued) III. Responses to Comments (Continued) III.D Comment Letters Comment Letter No. 293 Deborah Lehman, MD Clinical Director, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Cedars-Sinai Medical Center 8700 Beverly Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90048 Comment No. 293-1 As a member of The Archer School for Girls’ Board of Trustees, and a close neighbor, I believe that the Archer Forward Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan is necessary to ensure the school’s future success. I am writing to request your support for our project. Archer has committed itself to being a good neighbor since the school moved to its current location on Sunset Boulevard in 1999. As specified by our CUP, Archer requires at least 50% of its students to carpool, which is much more stringent than any other school in the area, including Brentwood School and Saint Martin of Tours. Last year, roughly 80% of our students took the bus to school every day. As a result, we are responsible for only a small percentage of the traffic in the area. Archer works hard to find any avenues that would reduce additional traffic to an already congested area. As a parent of an Archer graduate as well as a current student I can personally attest to the value of this school as an institution for girls all over the city. Our girls deserve a school with facilities comparable to other independent schools in the area. As a parent and a neighbor I can confirm Archer’s strict adherence to its CUP and applaud the school for being a leader with respect to traffic regulation in the area. As you may recall, we have met or exceeded the requirements set forth in our CUP at every review. We intend to continue to hold ourselves to the same standard during the public review process through construction activities and beyond. We will reach out to every community organization and household who would like to hear about our project. Our goal is to answer all questions and concerns, and of course, to secure support. This project is a thoughtful plan that will fill a critical need for onsite athletics, academic, arts, recreational facilities, and more efficient on-campus parking. We hope you’ll agree that Archer Forward is the best plan for our school and community. Your support of our efforts throughout the public review process would be greatly appreciated. City of Los Angeles Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan SCH. No. 2012011001 November 2014 Page III-1207 WORKING DRAFT – Not for Public Review III.D Comment Letters We hope you will agree that Archer Forward is the best plan for our school and for our community. Your support of our efforts throughout the public review process would be greatly appreciated. Response to Comment No. 293-1 This comment indicating support for the Project is noted for the record and will be forwarded to the decision-makers for review and consideration. City of Los Angeles Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan SCH. No. 2012011001 November 2014 Page III-1208 WORKING DRAFT – Not for Public Review III.D Comment Letters Comment Letter No. 294 Mara Lenkov 4924 Agnes Ave. Valley Village, CA 91607 Comment No. 294-1 I am the parent of an Archer girl and I am writing because I am a strong supporter of The Archer School for Girls and it’s proposed plan, Archer Forward. I am requesting that you and Council member Bonin work closely with Archer and help the school secure approval for this well thought out plan. Archer Forward both enhances the school and respects Archer’s location in residential Brentwood. The design was created to buffer the community while creating more green and beauty in the neighborhood. It is sustainable and creates an all-pedestrian campus, with parking underground. The plan has already been modified several times at the request of our neighbors, and we are continuing to meet with the community to ensure the best plan. Archer is a valuable institution in Los Angeles. Girls are taught to be good citizens and leaders, and are involved in community service throughout the city. The Archer Forward plan will provide deeply needed arts and athletic facilities as well as preserving the beautiful, historic building. It’s a plan that works for both the School and the Community, and I hope that the city will support it. The girls of Archer give so much back to the community—I think it is time for the City to give back to them as well. Thank you. Response to Comment No. 294-1 This comment indicating support for the Project is noted for the record and will be forwarded to the decision-makers for review and consideration. City of Los Angeles Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan SCH. No. 2012011001 November 2014 Page III-1209 WORKING DRAFT – Not for Public Review III.D Comment Letters Comment Letter No. 295 Laurie Lerner 3626 Mandeville Canyon Rd. Los Angeles, CA 90049-1024 Comment No. 295-1 I am writing you to ask that you veto, or at the very least support the alternative plan to The Archer School massive expansion plan. Response to Comment No. 295-1 This introductory comment expressing opposition to the Project is noted for the record and will be forwarded to the decision-makers for review and consideration. The commenter does not provide a description of the alterntive plan that could be considered. Refer to Topical Response No. 14, Residential Neighbors’ Proposed Alternative, for a detailed response to the alternative proposed by the Residential Neighbors of Archer. Specific comments regarding the Draft EIR are provided and responded to below. Comment No. 295-2 As a resident of Mandeville Canyon for the past 15 years, I have seen traffic going East on Sunset and San Vicente Blvd. from Bundy Dr. increase to the point where I either have to take side streets (when possible—which it is not when going to the 405 Hwy.), or spend up to a half hour—or more if there is construction or an accident—to just get from Bundy to Barrington or the 405, or just turn around and not go to my local stores, restaurants, bank, etc. In fact the traffic has gotten so bad that it sometimes is stalled almost all the way to Mandeville Canyon itself. As I am sure you probably know by now, the report from the Department of Transportation indicated that Archer’s proposed project will create SIGNIFICANT impacts on both Bundy Drive and Sunset, Barrington Ave. and Sunset, Wilshire, and Montana, as well as Barrington Place and Sunset, which CANNOT be physically mitigated. The consequences of this is truly a nightmare for those of us who live in this wonderful area. Response to Comment No. 295-2 This comment does not address the adequacy of the analysis in the Draft EIR. The comment is noted for the record and will be forwarded to decision-makers for review and consideration. City of Los Angeles Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan SCH. No. 2012011001 November 2014 Page III-1210 WORKING DRAFT – Not for Public Review III.D Comment Letters Refer to Topical Response No. 10, Traffic Congestion Along Sunset Boulevard, for a detailed discussion of traffic congestion in the vicinity of the Project Site. In addition, as evaluated in Section IV.K, Traffic, Access, and Parking, of the Draft EIR and as discussed in Topical Response No. 5, Additional Mitigation Measures to Eliminate Significant Traffic Impacts, with implementation of the operational mitigation measures presented in the Draft EIR and Final EIR, all Project operational traffic impacts would be reduced to below a level of significance. Comment No. 295-3 I think it is also very unfair for all of us who live here to have to suffer because the Archer School is choosing to renege on their agreement with the Brentwood Homeowners Association, neighbors and the City who put in place restrictions (made 15 years ago when they came here). Their new proposal has no commitment to keep the existing use restrictions in place. Response to Comment No. 295-3 As described in Topical Response No. 16, Environmental Review and Conditional Use Permit Processes, Archer is currently operating pursuant to CUP No. 98-0158, which was approved through the required public process and contains conditions of approval governing campus operations and physical improvements. A new CUP and other concurrent entitlement requests, if approved by the decision-makers, would subject the School to a new set of conditions of approval, including conditions regarding compatibility of the School’s operations and its facilities with the surrounding neighborhood. This comment is noted for the record and will be forwarded to the decision-makers for review and consideration. Comment No. 295-4 PLEASE HELP! Let the City and Councilman Mike Bonin know you do not support the proposed Archer Forward plan. A number of my neighbors support an alternative plan that reduces the size and scope of the proposed project as well as traffic and puts less burden on the neighborhood. I myself would prefer it be vetoed in entirety but if not, I definitely support their alternative plan over the terrible Archer Forward Plan. City of Los Angeles Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan SCH. No. 2012011001 November 2014 Page III-1211 WORKING DRAFT – Not for Public Review III.D Comment Letters Response to Comment No. 295-4 In response to comments, the Project has been refined, including reducing the square footage and massing, width, and length of some of the proposed buildings, reducing the number of parking spaces, and creating expanded landscape buffers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Incline Project – Traffic Management Plan Update Updated: September 2, 2014
    City of Santa Monica Transportation Engineering & Management Division 1685 Main Street, Room 115 Santa Monica, CA 90401 California Incline Project – Traffic Management Plan Update Updated: September 2, 2014 Summary The demolition and reconstruction of the California Incline in Santa Monica is currently scheduled to begin in early 2015. Throughout the conceptual development and environmental study of the project, traffic congestion concerns and the requirements to manage and mitigate traffic congestion were at the forefront. The design for the project is currently in-progress, and a comprehensive traffic management plan is being developed. The traffic management plan consists of four core components: • Extensive deployment of traffic sensors and dynamic message boards to monitor real-time traffic conditions and provide real-time travel information. • Emphasis of detour routes to/from Downtown Santa Monica via the Moomat Ahiko ramp at Pacific Coast Highway and via the Lincoln Boulevard ramp at I-10. • Traffic counts will be collected at key locations immediately before and after the California Incline is closed in order to provide baseline traffic data. • Provision of as-needed traffic control devices and on-call support staff to address any congestion issues that occur, such as increased traffic in Santa Monica Canyon. Real-Time Traffic Monitoring and Information A total of 16 Bluetooth sensors and eight dynamic message boards will be deployed in key locations in order to monitor traffic conditions and report information to motorists in real-time, as shown on the figure below. One additional sensor may be deployed as-needed. Real-time information will also be transmitted to local news agencies, online travel applications, and in-vehicle navigation companies.
    [Show full text]
  • APA Conf Planners Guide.Indd
    2012 National Planning Conference Los Angeles Planner’s Guide Sponsors of the 2012 Planner’s Guide Conference Co-Chairs: Marissa Aho, AICP Generosity in the form of in-kind and monetary contributions from the following fi rms: Vince Bertoni, AICP Kurt Christiansen, AICP Anne McIntosh, AICP California Chapter President: Kevin Keller, AICP Los Angeles Section Director: Marissa Aho, AICP This guide book was prepared as a service to those attending the American Planning Association’s 2012 National Planning Conference in Los Angeles. Los Angeles Past Section Director: Special Thanks Kristen Asp, AICP The Planner’s Guide committee would like to extend special thanks to: Local Host Committee: Jessie Barkley – Local Host Events Jeanette Cappiello, Assistant Art Director, RBF Consulting, a company of Michael Baker Corporation, for her creative graphic design and layout of the Planners Guide. Francisco Contreras, AICP – Marketing and Merchandise Steve Gerhardt, AICP – Mobile Workshops Kate Gillespie, AICP, Owner and Principal, 3D Visions, for creating maps that allow us William Hoose – Local Host Events to navigate easily throughout the Los Angeles proper region. Susan Healy Keene, AICP - Local Host Events Ira Brown, Planner, City of Long Beach, for his outstanding photographs to John Keho, AICP - Local Host Events showcase the unique places, spaces, and buildings of the Los Angeles area. Jeff rey Lambert, AICP - AICP Workshop Ioana Ciurariu, City of Los Angeles, and Francisco Contreras, AICP, City of West Michael Laughlin, AICP – Mobile Workshops Hollywood, for their artistic inspiration and creation of the iconic Reimagine LA Nicholas Maricich – Orientation Tours 2012 Cover Artwork that captures the fun, spirit, and variety Los Angeles has to Collette Morse, AICP – AICP Workshop off er.
    [Show full text]
  • City Landmark Assessment Report, Palisades Park
    City Landmark Assessment Report Palisades Park West Side of 100-1500 Blocks, Ocean Avenue Santa Monica, California March 2007 City Landmark Assessment Report Palisades Park West Side of 100-1500 Blocks, Ocean Avenue Santa Monica, California Prepared for: City of Santa Monica Planning Division Prepared by: Margarita J. Wuellner, Ph.D. and Sonali Gupta- Agarwal, M.A. PCR Services Corporation 233 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 130 Santa Monica, California March 2007 Table of Contents Page BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................ 1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................................ 1 Regulatory Setting ...................................................................................................................... 1 Alterations................................................................................................................................... 1 Research and Survey Methodology ............................................................................................ 2 Site Description......................................................................................................................... 10 Longitudinal Elements.............................................................................................................. 10 Area-specific Elements ............................................................................................................. 12 Individual
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Regular Meeting of the Board Wednesday, May 27, 2015 7:00–9
    Regular Meeting of the Board Wednesday, May 27, 2015 7:00–9:00 P.M. American Jewish University 15600 Mulholland Drive, Sperber Community Library, 2nd Floor, Main Bldg., Bel Air, CA 90077 Accessible from the west side of Casiano Road; park at lower parking (Lot 1) below the security kiosk Accommodations for Disabilities. As a covered entity under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Los Angeles does not discriminate on the basis of disability, and, upon request, will provide reasonable accommodation to ensure equal access to its programs, services, and activities. Sign language interpreters, listening devices, or other auxiliary aids and/or services will be provided upon request. To ensure availability of services, please make your request at least 3 business days prior to the meeting you wish to attend by contacting BABCNC Administrator, Cathy Palmer, at (310) 479-6247 or email [email protected]. Public Access to Documents. In compliance with California Government Code section 54957.5, non-exempt writings that are distributed to a majority or all of the board in advance of a meeting, may be viewed before the meeting at our website by clicking on www.babcnc.org or at the scheduled meeting. The QR code in the upper left hand of this page links to the Agenda and Minutes webpage for the Council. In addition, if you would like a copy of any record related to an item on the agenda, contact BABCNC Administrator, Cathy Palmer, 310-479- 6247 or email [email protected]. Notice of Meetings. The agenda is physically posted for public review at Bel Air Foods (formerly “Bel Air Market”), 2323 Roscomare Rd., 90077, Glen Center Postal Service 2934 1/2 N Beverly Glen Cir 90077, Laurel Canyon Country Store 2108 Laurel Canyon Blvd, 90046, Glen Market, 1603 N Beverly Glen Blvd., 90077 and/or Bel Air Bar & Grill, 662 North Sepulveda Blvd., 90049.
    [Show full text]
  • September 11, 2018 Santa Monica, California ORDINANCE NUMBER
    City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 Santa Monica, California ORDINANCE NUMBER 2587 (CCS) (City Council Series) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA AMENDING CHAPTER 3.12 AND SECTIONS 4.55.065 AND 10.08.460 OF THE SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL CODE TO CLARIFY AND UPDATE REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE OPERATION OF ELECTRIC BICYCLES, ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICES, ELECTRICALLY MOTORIZED BOARDS, LOW-SPEED VEHICLES, AND MOTORIZED SCOOTERS IN LOCATIONS INCLUDING THE BEACH-BIKE PATH, CITY PARKS AND THE MUNICIPAL PIER WHEREAS, the City of Santa Monica (City) maintains jurisdiction to enforce state and local traffic laws within City limits, including the portion of the Marvin Braude Coastal Bike Trail (“Beach Bike-Path”) within City limits; and WHEREAS, under state law, a motorized scooter may operate on a bicycle path or trail or bikeway, unless a local authority having jurisdiction over that path, trail, or bikeway prohibits that operation by ordinance; and WHEREAS, in recent months, in part due to rapid technological advancements, the City parks and the Beach Bike-Path specifically have been flooded with mobility devices, primarily motorized scooters; and WHEREAS, the rapid proliferation of mobility devices, primarily motorized scooters, creates safety hazards for pedestrians, bicyclists and mobility device users; and 1 WHEREAS, the Beach Bike-Path is a completely separated right-of-way designated principally for the use of bicycles with crossflows by motorists minimized; and WHEREAS, motorized scooters left in City parks and on the Beach Bike-Path, block paths of travel and create safety hazards, especially for persons with disabilities; and WHEREAS, even in the past few months, motorized scooters have been involved in a number of accidents, some resulting in serious injuries; and WHEREAS, the City desires to clarify traffic regulations as they pertain to the operation of mobility devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Log of Bridges on State Highways October, 2018 DISTRICT 07 07-LA-001
    October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS i October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS California Log of Bridges on State Highways Contents Bridge List Items and Keys to Coded Information...................................................ii County Table................................................................................................................v Alphabetic City Code Table.......................................................................................vi District Log..................................................................................................................1 Index of Bridge Numbers...........................................................................................I1 Prepared by California Department of Transportation Structure Maintenance & Investigations The information in this publication is available on the World Wide Web at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/structur/strmaint/brlog2.htm ii October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS BRIDGE LIST ITEMS AND KEYS TO CODED INFORMATION Postmile Entries in BOLD type show DISTRICT-COUNTY-ROUTE. Other entries show postmile prefix followed by postmile to the nearest hundredth of a mile. Prefixes of R, M, and N refer to re-aligned routes. Prefix L refers to a section or route paralleling another route. When the route is on the deck of the bridge, the postmile is recorded at the beginning of the structure (i.e. the lowest postmile on the bridge). When the route goes under the structure, the postmile is recorded on the underpassing route where
    [Show full text]
  • Draft EIS/EIR
    Final Construction and Mitigation Technical Report 4.0—Summary of Construction Methods, Techniques, and Equipment * Figure 4-27: Century City Station to Wilshire/Bundy WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION August 23, 2010 Page 4-61 Final Construction and Mitigation Technical Report 4.0—Summary of Construction Methods, Techniques, and Equipment 4.2.5.4 Maintenance Yards Division 20 Maintenance Yard This work appears to be essentially surface work in soils that have been exposed over the years to potentially contaminating influences of on-going equipment maintenance and storage. For this reason it is foreseen that excavated materials will be processed for re-use or disposed of at suitable dump sites. Since this yard is actively being utilized coordination of the work and delineation of permissible work areas will be a requirement. It is assumed that this will involve a structure far less complicated than that for an in-line station and would be a completely separate item of work. As such, it would have virtually no impact on the critical path as long as construction contracts are handled in a timely manner. Union Pacific Railroad – Los Angeles Transportation Center Rail Yard This work is essentially at the surface and involves a new, perhaps a singular, alignment from the Division 20 Maintenance yard northward into the north side of the Union Pacific Railroad Los Angeles Transportation Center Rail Yard. The alignment crosses over the Los Angeles River and an existing bridge which means that there will be an approach grade built into the abutment and the bridge crossing structure. This new alignment parallels existing and active track systems and therefore will require strict coordination of the work with train traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Area Disclosures Property Address: ______
    Local Area Disclosures Property Address: ______________________________________________________ The following disclosures are intended to provide buyer with information that may affect the subject property. Buyer is advised to consult with a specialist with regard to the impact any specific disclosure may have on the intended use of the property. Buyer may also contact the city council representative for the area where the property is located to obtain additional information. 1. Report of City Residential Records Regarding the Property: Buyer is advised that numerous cities in California, including without limitation, Los Angeles, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, and Culver City, require that prior to the close of escrow, Seller must deliver to Buyer, at Seller’s expense, a report regarding all records of the City with respect to the Property. If the Property is residential property located in the City of Los Angeles, a “Report of Residential Property Records and Pending Special Assessment Liens” in accordance with Los Angeles City Ordinance No. 144.942 (9A Report) is required. Buyer and Seller acknowledge that broker(s) is not responsible for the timely delivery of the required reports. 2. Los Angeles Impact Hazard Glazing: Buyer and Seller are aware that City of Los Angeles Ordinance No. 161.136 requires that all external sliding glass doors(the sliding part only) be tempered glass or “impact hazard glazed” with a safety film approved by the City of Los Angeles prior to the close of escrow. 3. Rent Control: Buyer is advised that the Property may be subject to a rent control or rent stabilization ordinance which among other things may require the registration of rental units and may govern the ability to evict tenants and provide for relocation fees for tenants.
    [Show full text]
  • Log of Bridges on State Highways
    October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS i October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS California Log of Bridges on State Highways Contents Bridge List Items and Keys to Coded Information...................................................ii County Table................................................................................................................v Alphabetic City Code Table.......................................................................................vi District Log..................................................................................................................1 Index of Bridge Numbers...........................................................................................I1 Prepared by California Department of Transportation Structure Maintenance & Investigations The information in this publication is available on the World Wide Web at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/structur/strmaint/brlog2.htm ii LO G OF BR IDGE S ON STA TE HIG HW A YSOctober, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYSOctober, BRIDGE LIST ITEMS AND KEYS TO CODED INFORMATION Postmile Entries in BOLD type show DISTRICT-COUNTY-ROUTE. Other entries show postmile prefix followed by postmile to the nearest hundredth of a mile. Prefixes of R, M, and N refer to re-aligned routes. Prefix L refers to a section or route paralleling another route. When the route is on the deck of the bridge, the postmile is recorded at the beginning of the structure (i.e. the lowest postmile on the bridge). When the route goes under the structure, the postmile
    [Show full text]
  • City Sets New Timeline for Downtown Community Plan
    THE SUMMER 2016 IN THIS ISSUE DCP............................................ 1 Minimum Wage.................... 2 Major Construction.............. 3 Expo Celebrations................. 4 New Noise Rules................... 6 Stop ’N Cafe Profile............. 7 Quarterly Ambassadors....... 8 Neighborhood Group........... 9 New Businesses................... 10 City sets new timeline for Downtown Community Plan he revised draft of the Downtown Community Plan oughly understanding and analyzing the policies that will (DCP), released in February, was scheduled to go go into the plan. Tbefore the City Council this summer. But the City of Santa Monica announced last month a new timeline for “We’re not planning for a sleepy beach town and we’re not community input and revisions to the draft and the DCP is planning for Manhattan,” Cole said. now set to go before Council in spring 2017. There are three key objectives with the “reboot” of the time- The DCP is intended to guide public and private investment line, Cole said. in Downtown Santa Monica for the next 20 years or longer. The first is that it is probably best to not do the debating City Manager Rick Cole decided to adjust the timeline to over the DCP this summer, in the middle of an election sea- ensure a full public outreach program aimed at engaging son. The second was to bring the community together and as many Santa Monicans as possible. make it stronger through allowing more time for the process of developing the plan. The third was to take the “This is a key planning document and we have to get it time to have a great plan, not a great document.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation of an Icon
    FORMATION OF AN ICON 1202 3rd Street Promenade | Santa Monica UNCOVERING THE FUTURE EXPERIENCE FUT- The opportunity presented by this space is a vivid reimagination of the retail and leisure experience EXPERIENCEURE MODERN LEGEND A VISION HISTORIC UNIQUE PRESERVATION OF ICON A space with celebrated past and historic CELEBRATEDWORLD-CLASS designation holds a clear path for unique styles and stories SUCCESS VISION LEGEND WORLD-CLASS STRATEGYLD- GLOBAL DESTINATION CLASS Visitors come far and wide to explore Santa Monica and make their way to the promenade ICONIC for California-style shopping and dining SANTA MONICA’S accessibility Parking Anchor Transportation Santa Monica, one of Los Angeles’ prime retail markets, continues to thrive as a popular beachfront neighborhood for residents, workers and tourists Ample public Major traffic at Just 5 blocks from alike. Located just below multiple state parks and stretching 3.5 miles parking in the area the corner of Wilshire the Metro Expo line along the Pacific coastline, Santa Monica, home to Third Street Promenade, Santa Monica Place, Santa Monica Pier and its carnival attractions, and the 10-block shopping district of Montana Ave, is not surprisingly one of the top tourist destinations within Los Angeles County. Santa Monica balances an exciting urban environment with recreational offerings like hiking in the Topanga Canyon trails or surfing in the Pacific. Consistently one of the highest performing streets in Los Angeles County in terms of number of sales and transactions, Third Street Promenade cannot be ignored as a major economic driver for Santa Monica and the overall Los Angeles region by drawing crowds to its premier pedestrian paseo.
    [Show full text]
  • 2618 2Nd Street Santa Monica, CA
    2618 2nd Street Santa Monica, CA $2,695,000 4.07% Current Capitalization Rate Turnkey Building Steps Away from World-Famous Santa Monica State Beach Table of Contents 3 Investment Summary ▪ The Opportunity ▪ Property Description ▪ Exterior and Interior Photos ▪ Aerial Photos 11 Market Overview ▪ Apartment Market Overview ▪ Places of Interest ▪ Silicon Beach Major Employers ▪ Nearby Developments ▪ Demographics 17 Financial Summary ▪ Pricing, Property and Operating Statement Summary ▪ Rent Roll ▪ Sales Comparables ▪ Sales Comparables Map ▪ Rent Comparables ▪ Rent Comparables Map John Swartz Josh Kaplan Copyright © 2021 Transwestern. California Brokerage License #01263636. The Managing Director Managing Director information in this offering memorandum was gathered by Transwestern from 213.430.2526 213.430.2538 sources believed reliable. Transwestern has not verified the information and [email protected] [email protected] makes no guarantee, warranty or representation about it. It is the potential buyer’s CA Lic 01873487 CA Lic 01934177 responsibility to independently confirm its accuracy and completeness. Any projections, opinions, assumptions or estimates used are for example only and Troy Lucero Transwestern Real Estate Services do not represent the current or future performance of the property. Potential Senior Associate 601 S. Figueroa St, Suite 3650 buyers and their advisors should conduct a careful, independent investigation of 213.457.1656 Los Angeles, CA 90017 the property to determine to their satisfaction the suitability of the property for [email protected] 213.624.5700 their needs. CA Lic 02015701 transwestern.com Investment Summary Transwestern as the exclusive listing agent is pleased to present the opportunity to acquire 2618 2nd Street, Santa Monica, California 90405, a 3-unit property comprised of a bungalow and a detached duplex located in Ocean Park submarket just 2 blocks from the ocean and within feet of Main Street/Downtown Santa Monica.
    [Show full text]