DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplement to Soil Survey of Los Angeles County, California, Southeastern Part

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplement to Soil Survey of Los Angeles County, California, Southeastern Part United States Department of Agriculture Supplement to the Natural Soil Survey of Resources Conservation Service Los Angeles County, California, Southeastern Part National Cooperative Soil Survey This document was made for the National Cooperative Soil Survey by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, in cooperation with the Santa Monica Mountains Resource Conservation District; the Foundation for Pierce College and Pierce College Farm Center; and the State of California, Department of Conservation. This supplement accompanies the most current official data for the soil survey of Los Angeles County, California, Southeastern Part, available at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov. Acknowledgement is also given to the many agencies, organization, cities, and school districts who provided access to lands and areas that were essential to making this survey. They include the Army Corps of Engineers, Baldwin Hills Conservancy, Burbank Unified School District, California Coastal Commission, California State Parks, California Polytechnic State University—Pomona, Hacienda La Puente Unified School District, Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks, Los Angeles Unified School District, Los Angeles World Airports, Montebello Unified School District, Palos Verdes Land Conservancy, Puente Hills Habitat Preservation Authority, Rivers and Mountains Conservancy, and Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy. Many thanks to all cooperating cities and municipalities that provided access to the city parks and other city owned properties. They are Azusa, Baldwin Park, Beverly Hills, Carson, Cerritos, Compton, Covina, Culver City, Diamond Bar, Duarte, El Monte, El Segundo, Gardena, Glendora, Hawthorne, Industry, Inglewood, La Canada- Flintridge, La Mirada, La Puente, La Verne, Lakewood, Lawndale, Lomita, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Manhattan Beach, Montebello, Monterey Park, Norwalk, Palos Verdes Estates, Pasadena, Pico Rivera, Pomona, Rancho Palos Verdes, Redondo Beach, Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, Rosemead, San Dimas, Santa Fe Springs, Santa Monica, Sierra Madre, Signal Hill, South El Monte, South Pasadena, Temple City, Torrance, Walnut, West Covina, West Hollywood, and Whittier. This document is part of the technical assistance furnished by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, Lancaster, California Office to the Santa Monica Mountain Resource Conservation District. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 2016. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 2016. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 2016. Literature Citation The correct citation for this survey is as follows: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2017. Supplement to the soil survey of Los Angeles County, California, Southeastern Part. Accessible online at: http://soils.usda.gov/survey/printed_surveys/. Cover Caption The Los Angeles metropolitan area, as seen looking south from Verdugo Mountain, near Glendale, California. Downtown Los Angeles is in the center of the photo, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula is in the distance. Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available online from the Natural Resources Conservation Service at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/. i Nondiscrimination Statement The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, whether all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information. The Department prohibits discrimination in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency’s EEO Counselor (http://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/33081.wba) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or personnel action. Additional information can be found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_file.html. If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, found online at http://www.ascr.usda. gov/complaint_filing_cust.html or at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all of the information requested in the form. Send your completed complaint form or letter by email to program.intake@usda. gov or by mail to: USDA Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 If you are deaf, are hard of hearing, or have speech disabilities and you wish to file either an EEO or program complaint, please contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339 or (800) 845-6136 (in Spanish). If you have other disabilities and wish to file a program complaint, please see the contact information above. If you require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.), please contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). ii Contents Preface......................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ...................................................................................................................1 General Nature of the Survey Area ............................................................................1 Physiography, Relief, and Drainage .......................................................................1 Major Land Resource Areas ..................................................................................5 History and Development ......................................................................................6 Climate ...................................................................................................................8 Table 1.—Temperature ........................................................................................9 Table 2.—Precipitation ......................................................................................10 Urban Use of Soils ...................................................................................................11 How This Survey Was Made ....................................................................................13 Soil Mapping in the Urban Environment ...................................................................15 Anthropogenic Soil Descriptions and Symbols ....................................................17 Classification of the Soils ..........................................................................................19 Soil Series and Their Morphology ............................................................................19 Abaft Series .........................................................................................................20 Alo Series ............................................................................................................21 Anaheim Series ...................................................................................................22 Anthraltic Xerorthents, Loamy Substratum ..........................................................23 Apollo Series ........................................................................................................25 Aquic Xerorthents ................................................................................................27 Aquic Xerorthents, Fine Substratum ....................................................................29 Aquic Xerorthents, Graded ..................................................................................30 Arbolado Series ...................................................................................................32 Azuvina Series .....................................................................................................35 Balcom Series ......................................................................................................37 Ballast Series .......................................................................................................39 Ballona Series ......................................................................................................42 Biscailuz Series ...................................................................................................44 Blasingame Series ...............................................................................................46 Boades Series .....................................................................................................46 Bolsa Series .........................................................................................................48 Buzzpeak Series ..................................................................................................50 Calcic Haploxerepts .............................................................................................53 Calleguas Series ..................................................................................................55 Caperton Family ..................................................................................................56
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Drainage in Los Angeles
    •Ballona Creek Watershed• Drainage in Los Angeles Alice Wang The University of Texas at Austin Environmental and Water Resources Engineering GIS CE 394K | Fall 2016 | Dr. Maidment Drainage in Los Angeles: Ballona Creek Watershed Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES 3 LIST OF TABLES 3 LIST OF EQUATIONS 4 INTRODUCTION 5 PROJECT SCOPE 5 OBJECTIVES 5 WATERSHED BACKGROUND 5 WATERSHED OVERVIEW 5 URBANIZATION IMPACTS 6 METHODOLOGY 9 RESULTS AND ANALYSIS 9 NATIONAL WATER MODEL FORECAST 17 CONCLUSION 22 FUTURE WORK 22 REFERENCES 24 2 Drainage in Los Angeles: Ballona Creek Watershed List of Figures Figure 1. Ballona Creek Watershed Street Map View from LADPW ............................................................ 6 Figure 2. Pre-Development and Post-Development of Ballona Creek watershed (Braa et al., 2001) ......... 7 Figure 3. Conceptual water balance applicable to pre and post development of a given watershed ........ 7 Figure 4. Ballona Creek Channel from Aerial View ...................................................................................... 8 Figure 5. Land use distribution in Ballona Creeek watershed .................................................................... 10 Figure 6. ArcGis Pro Ballona Creek Watershed map of landcover ............................................................. 11 Figure 7. ArcGis Pro Ballona Creek Watershed Map of Landcover and NHDPlusV2 .................................. 12 Figure 8. Ballona Creek Watershed map with channelized tributaries from CA Waterboards ................. 12 Figure 9. ArcGIS
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Report MAY 20, 2019 Prepared by Maury Edwards Environmental Chair
    Environmental Report MAY 20, 2019 Prepared by Maury Edwards Environmental Chair Whittier Narrow Dam Repairs The Army Corps of Engineers has expressed concerns that the flood control dam at Whittier Narrows is likely to fail in the event of a severe storm event. This would cause extensive flooding in downstream communities affecting over one million Southern California residents. Although Hacienda Heights would not be directly affected the adjacent communities of Pico Rivera, Santa Fee Springs and Whittier are at risk. Congresswomen Grace Napolitano is requesting FY 20 funding to repair the dam. The final environmental impact statement is expected to be released in May that would allow for the project design and construction starting in 2019 with completion in 2025. L.A. County Board of Supervisors rejects Quemetco plant Expansion The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted on February 19 to oppose the expansion of the Quemtco battery recycling plant located in the City of Industry. The vote was unanimous and a five signature letter will be sent to state and regional environmental agencies requesting that deny Quemetco permission to expand operation by 25 percent. There are too many unanswered questions regarding toxic emissions and release. Hacienda Heights Improvement Association and the His Lai Temple members voiced concerns at the Council meeting. Those attending were and voicing concerns were Scott Martin, President; Board Members Adriana Quinonis; Jennifer Kelly and Lucy Pedregon. Letters from past present Mike Williams and former environmental chairman Joan Licari were also presented. Gina Ooi represented the His Lai Buddhist Temple. The situation with Quemtco is closely being monitored by Congressman Ian Calderon's office and any decisions in regard to Quemtco's expansion plans will be forwarded to all concerned parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Burbank Commission City of Burbank Boards, Commissions & Committees Submit Date: May 03, 2021 Application Form
    Sustainable Burbank Commission City of Burbank Boards, Commissions & Committees Submit Date: May 03, 2021 Application Form Profile Elliot A Gannon Prefix First Name Middle Initial Last Name Email Address N Hollywood Way Home Address Suite or Apt Burbank CA 91505 City State Postal Code Mobile: Primary Phone Alternate Phone Director’s Guild of America Assistant Director 2nd AD Employer Job Title Occupation Which Boards would you like to apply for? Police Commission: Submitted Sustainable Burbank Commission: Submitted Length of time as a Burbank Resident: 15 years Burbank Registered Voter? Yes No Interests & Experiences Please tell us about yourself and why you want to serve. Why are you interested in serving on a board, commission or committee? I love Burbank and desire to be a part of it’s continual improvement. Education Palos Verdes Peninsula High School Dell Arte International School of Physical Theatre Additional Pertinent Courses or Training I’ve spent over twenty years working in theatre and film production Elliot A Gannon Other Pertinent Skills, Experience or Interests I’m very active in community outreach, easily approachable, and a natural leader. Upload a Resume Community Involvement Specify current or prior service on a City Board, Commission or Committee: N/A List Community activities in which you are involved: I’ve been active with the Burbank Arts Festival several times over the last decade. I volunteer as a member of Media City Church with different outreaches in the county. Very active on the ground with community outreach. If you are related to any City of Burbank employee(s), please state their name(s), relationship(s), and department(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Facts About the Malibu Lagoon Restoration and Enhancement Plan
    FACTS ABOUT THE MALIBU LAGOON RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT PLAN The project is not intended to “clean up” the water quality for recreation, but it will have water quality benefits for the aquatic ecosystem. The lagoon is not healthy • The lagoon is listed on the federal 303(d) list of impaired water bodies, due to excess nutrients and low oxygen levels. • Data collected continuously since 2006 show oxygen levels are frequently below 5 mg per liter, a level that causes stress to aquatic organisms. • Excess nutrients and bacteria attach to fine sediments that settle on the bottom of the channels. • The excess sedimentation is due to poor circulation. • The poor circulation is caused by the pinch points of fill that support the pedestrian bridges, and by the unnatural alignment of the channels, perpendicular to the main lagoon channel. The only way to correct the poor circulation is to remove old fill and reconfigure the channels to a more natural pattern. • The three channels will be reconfigured into a single branched channel that angles towards the ocean. • A single branched channel will cause the water to move faster and will help prevent excess sedimentation. This is similar to the Venturi effect, where the velocity of a fluid increases as the cross section of the tube carrying it decreases. The work will occur only in the western channels and the Adamson boat house channel, not in the main body of the lagoon. • The sand berm beach will not be changed. • The surf break will not be impacted. • The location of the breach and the timing of breaches will not change.
    [Show full text]
  • K. Garrison Clarke Collection of Photographs of Southern California and Baja California, Mexico 0322
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt8n39s2f8 No online items The Finding Aid of the K. Garrison Clarke collection of photographs of Southern California and Baja California, Mexico 0322 Finding aid prepared by Katie Richardson The processing of this collection and the creation of this finding aid was funded by the generous support of the Council on Library and Information Resources. First edition USC Libraries Special Collections Doheny Memorial Library 206 3550 Trousdale Parkway Los Angeles, California, 90089-0189 213-740-5900 [email protected] October 2010 The Finding Aid of the K. Garrison 0322 1 Clarke collection of photographs of Southern California and Baja ... Title: K. Garrison Clarke collection of photographs of Southern California and Baja California, Mexico Collection number: 0322 Contributing Institution: USC Libraries Special Collections Language of Material: English Physical Description: 128.0 Items1 box Date (inclusive): 1948-1975 Abstract: The collection consists of 128 black and white reprints of images taken by K. Garrison Clarke between 1948 and 1975. Most of the images are taken in and around Los Angeles County. A sizable amount of photographs are from a 1961 photo shoot at Jungleland USA, an animal training center in Thousand Oaks, CA that housed animals used in Hollywood films. Images from a commercial experiment at Oxnard and the Channel Islands (1965) and photographs from a shoot for Mexico West Coast Magazine in Baja California (1965) are also included. creator: Clarke, Kenrow Garrison, 1931- Conditions Governing Access COLLECTION STORED OFF-SITE. Advance notice required for access. Arrangement Original order and original series designation were maintained with the Clarke Collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology and Water Quality Modeling of the Santa Monica Bay Watershed
    JULY 2009 19. Hydrology and Water Quality Modeling of the Santa Monica Bay Watershed Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this paper. The authors would also like to thank Eric Stein, Drew Ackerman, Ken Hoffman, Wing Tam, and Betty Dong for their timely advice and encouragement. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 100 N. Old San Gabriel Canyon Road Azusa, CA 91702. Preferred Citation: Sheng, J., and Wilson, J.P., 2009. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California: 18, Hydrology and Water Quality Modeling for the Santa Monica Bay Watershed. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California. Our goals are to protect and restore natural areas, restore natural hydrological function, promote equitable access to open space, and maximize support via multiple-use facilities. The Plan is a joint venture between the University of Southern California and the San Gabriel and lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy, Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, Coastal Conservancy, and Baldwin Hills Conservancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project
    Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project Year 3 Annual Report September 2019 Prepared for: City of Santa Monica California Coastal Commission US Environmental Protection Agency California Department of Parks and Recreation The Bay Foundation 8334 Lincoln Blvd. #310 (888) 301-2527 www.santamonicabay.org Year 3 Annual Report, September 2019 Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project Year 3 Annual Report September 2019 Prepared by: The Bay Foundation Prepared for: City of Santa Monica, California Coastal Commission, US Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Parks and Recreation Authors: Karina Johnston, Melodie Grubbs, and Chris Enyart, The Bay Foundation Scientific Contributors: David Hubbard, University of California Santa Barbara Dr. Jenifer Dugan, University of California Santa Barbara Dan Cooper, Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. Dr. Karen Martin, Pepperdine University Dr. Sean Anderson, California State University Channel Islands Dr. Guangyu Wang, Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission Evyan Sloane, California State Coastal Conservancy Suggested Citation: Johnston, K., M. Grubbs, and C. Enyart. 2019. Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project: Year 3 Annual Report. Report prepared by The Bay Foundation for City of Santa Monica, California Coastal Commission, US Environmental Protection Agency, and California Department of Parks and Recreation. 88 pages. Acknowledgements We would like to thank the US Environmental Protection Agency and the Metabolic Studio (Annenberg Foundation; Grant 15-541) for funding the implementation of this pilot project, and our partners: City of Santa Monica and California Department of Parks and Recreation. Their support has allowed us to explore soft-scape protection measures to increase coastal resilience, while bringing back an important coastal habitat to the Los Angeles region.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.9 Utilities
    LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SEPTEMBER 2 0 1 6 GENERAL PLAN LAND US E AND URBAN DESIGN E LEMENTS CITY OF LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 4.9 UTILITIES 4.9.1 Introduction This section describes the utility providers currently serving the planning area and evaluates the potential impacts of the City of Long Beach (City) General Plan Land Use Element and Urban Design Element (LUE/UDE) project (proposed project) on utility providers. This section is based on multiple data sources, including the Conservation Element (1973) of the City of Long Beach (City) General Plan and the proposed General Plan Land Use and Urban Design Elements (February 2016) (Appendix F), as well as coordination with potentially affected utility providers. Specific references are identified within the subsection for each respective issue. This section addresses the following utility service systems (service providers are noted in parenthesis): Solid Waste (Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts [LACSD]) Wastewater (Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts [LACSD]) Water (Long Beach Water Department [LBWD]) 4.9.2 Methodology After the Notice of Preparation (NOP) was issued, water, wastewater, and solid waste demands were modeled for build out of the proposed project. These calculations were modeled on a citywide basis. Generation rates obtained from applicable service providers were applied to both the existing (2012) land uses and the 2040 land uses proposed as part of the project. The net difference between the 2040 demand for utilities was then compared with the existing demand to generate the project-related increase in demand for water, wastewater treatment, and solid waste facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.5 Geology/Soils
    3.5 GEOLOGY/SOILS 3.5.1 INTRODUCTION This section describes the project’s impacts related to geology and soils, including such factors as seismology, soils, topography, and erosion. It also includes an examination of potential hazards associated with potential damage to proposed structures and infrastructure from ground shaking, potential liquefaction hazards and soils and soils stability. Applicable laws, regulations and relevant local planning policies that pertain to geology are also discussed. Much of the information contained in this subsection was based upon the following geotechnical reports submitted by consultants under contract to the Chandler’s Palos Verdes Sand and Gravel Company and the peer review of those technical studies by Arroyo/Willdan Geotechnical: Geologic Constraints Investigation of the Chandler’s Inert Solid Land Fill Quarry and Surrounding Properties, Rolling Hills Estates, California, Earth Consultants International, June 15, 2000. Phase I Geologic and Geotechnical Engineering Study to Determine Potential Development Areas within the Chandler’s P.V. Sand and Gravel Company Property, Adjacent Trust Properties and the Rolling Hills Country Club, Rolling Hills Estates, California, Neblett & Associates, Inc., December 2001. Fault Investigation, Phases I and II, Chandler Quarry and Rolling Hills Country Club, Palos Verdes Estates, California, Neblett & Associates, Inc., April 29, 2005. Geotechnical Review, Geologic and Geotechnical Engineering Study, Potential Development Areas within the Chandler’s P.V. Sand and Gravel Company Property, Adjacent Trust Properties, and the Rolling Hills Country Club, City of Rolling Hills Estates, California, prepared by Arroyo Geotechnical, September 24, 2007. Review of Response Report, Geotechnical Review, Geologic and Geotechnical Engineering Study, Potential Development Areas within the Chandler’s P.V.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Volume of the Complete Palos Verdes Anticlinorium: Stratigraphic
    The Volume of the Complete Palos Verdes Anticlinorium: Stratigraphic Horizons for the Community Fault Model Christopher Sorlien, Leonardo Seeber, Kris Broderick, Doug Wilson Figure 1: Faults, earthquakes, and locations. Lower hemisphere earthquake focal mechanisms, labeled by year, are from USGS and SCEC (1994), with location of 1930 earthquake (open circle) from Hauksson and Saldivar (1986). The surface or seafloor traces, or upper edges of blind faults are from the Southern California Earthquake Center Community Fault Model (Plesch and Shaw, 2002); other faults are from Sorlien et al. (2006). Figure 2 is located by red dashed polygon. L.A.=Los Angeles (downtown); LB=Long Beach (city and harbor); PVA=Palos Verdes anticlinorium, Peninsula and Hills, PVF=Palos Verdes fault; SPBF=San Pedro Basin fault; SMM=Santa Monica Mountains; SPS=San Pedro Shelf. Structural Setting If the water and post-Miocene sedimentary rocks were removed, the Los Angeles (L.A.) area would have huge relief, most of which was generated in the Plio-Pleistocene (Fig. 1; Wright, 1991). The five km-deep L.A. basin would be isolated from other basins to the SW by a major anticline-ridge, the Palos Verdes Anticlinorium (PVA), parallel to the current NW-SE coastline (Davis et al., 1989; Figures 2, 3). The Palos Verdes Hills have been long recognized as a contractional structure, but of dimensions similar to the peninsula (e.g., Woodring et al., 1946). This prominent topographic feature is instead only the exposed portion of the much larger PVA (Fig 2). Submerged parts of the PVA had previously been interpreted as separate anticlines (Nardin and Henyey, 1978; Legg et al., 2004) related in part to bends in strike-slip faults (Ward and Valensise, 1994), rather than a single complex structure above low-angle (oblique) thrust faults.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Summaries
    Appendix A: Watershed Summaries Preface California’s watersheds supply water for drinking, recreation, industry, and farming and at the same time provide critical habitat for a wide variety of animal species. Conceptually, a watershed is any sloping surface that sheds water, such as a creek, lake, slough or estuary. In southern California, rapid population growth in watersheds has led to increased conflict between human users of natural resources, dramatic loss of native diversity, and a general decline in the health of ecosystems. California ranks second in the country in the number of listed endangered and threatened aquatic species. This Appendix is a “working” database that can be supplemented in the future. It provides a brief overview of information on the major hydrological units of the South Coast, and draws from the following primary sources: • The California Rivers Assessment (CARA) database (http://www.ice.ucdavis.edu/newcara) provides information on large-scale watershed and river basin statistics; • Information on the creeks and watersheds for the ESU of the endangered southern steelhead trout from the National Marine Fisheries Service (http://swr.ucsd.edu/hcd/SoCalDistrib.htm); • Watershed Plans from the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) that provide summaries of existing hydrological units for each subregion of the south coast (http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcbs/index.html); • General information on the ecology of the rivers and watersheds of the south coast described in California’s Rivers and Streams: Working
    [Show full text]
  • LAFCO Local Agency Formation Commission for the County Oflos Angeles COMMISSION MEMBERS
    LAFCO Local Agency Formation Commission For The County OfLos Angeles COMMISSION MEMBERS: JERRY GLADBACH CHAJRMAN CAROL HERRERA FIRST VICE CHAJR GREIG SMITH SECOND VICE CHAJR NOTICE TO SUBJECT I INTERESTED AGENCIES DONALD L DEAR JAMES DIGIUSEPPE MARGARET FINLAY GLORlAMOUNA City of Rancho Palos Verdes-City Clerk HENRl F. PELUSSIER ZEV YAROSLAVSKY City of Rolling HiHs Estates-City Clerk Consolidated Fire Protection District ALTERNATE COMMISSION MEMBERS: County Office of the Assessor County Chief Executive Officer ROBERT APODACA KENNETH I. CHAPPELL County Sanitation Districts RlCHARD H. CLOSE DON KNABE Department of Parks and Recreation t4AR 02 2009 TOM LaBONGE JUDITH MJTCHELL Department of Public Works Department of Regional Planning STAFF: Los Angeles County West Vector Control district SANDOR L WINGER Palos Verdes Library District EXECUTIVE OFFICER Sheriff Department - Enforcement Bureau JUNE D. SAVALA DEPUTY Water Replenishment District of Southern California EXECUTIVE OFFICER West Basin Municipal Water District AMBER DE LA TORRE DOUGLASS DORADO SERA GROSSMAN AUSHA O'BRlEN-CONNER SUBJECT: City of Rancho Palos Verdes Reorganization No. 2009-02 WILDA TURNER (Detachment from the City of Rolling Hills Estates/Annexation to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes) Notice is hereby given that an application for the proposed reorganization listed above has been received by the Local Agency Formation Commission for the County of Los Angeles. The application involves detachment of approximately .010 ± acres of territory from the City of Rolling Hills Estates and annexation of the same said territory to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. The subject territory is generally located at 28220 Highridge Road, Rancho Palos Verdes. The proposal consists of the following proposed organizational changes: City or District Change of Organization City of Rancho Palos Verdes Annexation City of Rolling Hills Estates Detachment The proposed application, map, and legal description are attached for your information.
    [Show full text]