DOCSLIB.ORG

III. Responses to Comments (Continued)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
III. Responses to Comments (Continued) III. Responses to Comments (Continued) III.D Comment Letters Comment Letter No. 100 Barbara Bruser Co-Chair, Archer Board of Trustees [email protected] Comment No. 100-1 Archer’s Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan will help ensure that girls in Los Angeles have the opportunity to obtain a first-class education in a diverse, ambitious and joyful environment. I am writing to request your support for the plan as the public review process moves forward. Archer students train for and perform in award-winning arts programs, including: dance, theater, choir and orchestra. They also compete in a number of different sports with other local independent schools. Currently, Archer spends a great deal of resources renting off-site venues for practices, games and performances. Our plan envisions providing the essential facilities that will allow our students to participate in these activities onsite—facilities that most independent schools in the area already have. The new facilities we are proposing will greatly help advance the school’s mission to provide a 21st century education for girls across the city. Our innovative plan is consistent with the promises we made to our community, and we will continue to be a good neighbor. We have had a continuous dialogue with the community throughout this process and we plan to continue to work with local residents and stakeholders moving forward. As the Draft EIR for the Archer Forward Plan has now been released, we hope that you will add your support to this project. We look forward to working with you and your office. Response to Comment No. 100-1 This comment indicating support for the Project is noted for the record and will be forwarded to the decision-makers for review and consideration. City of Los Angeles Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan SCH. No. 2012011001 November 2014 Page III-878 WORKING DRAFT – Not for Public Review III.D Comment Letters Comment Letter No. 101 Tanya and Alex Bryzgalova [email protected] Comment No. 101-1 I have a daughter at Archer and I live in CD 11. I am very excited and strongly in support of the Archer Forward plan. My daughter chose to attend Archer because the School is truly unique in Los Angeles. The only secular girl’s school in the west side of Los Angeles, Archer’s student body reflects the diverse character of the entire City. With a high-quality curriculum, I believe that Archer is truly educating the future leaders of this country. But to fully deliver on Archer’s promise to the City, the School needs adequate facilities to create a 21st century campus. The Archer Forward plan would provide what the School really needs: modem classrooms, athletic fields and facilities and visual and performing arts spaces. Archer girls fully participate in academic, arts and athletics, and need the facilities to support these activities. You should see the girls trying to put on a performance on the small stage they currently have—girls are literally spilling off the ends! And the school currently doesn’t have a space where the entire campus can be together to watch a performance, hear a speaker or listen to announcements from the Head of School. I recognize that there are concerns about development in Brentwood, but it’s important to acknowledge that Archer has fully complied with the most stringent conditions imposed by the City on any independent school in Los Angeles. In fact, Archer has gone beyond the City’s requirements to ensure that the school has a minimal impact on traffic. I believe that track record should be celebrated, and the City should help Archer move forward with the reasonable new hours and operations they’re proposing. Archer is a jewel in Los Angeles, and I hope that you, Councilman Bonin and the rest of the City will help move the Archer Forward project quickly through the City process. Thank you. Response to Comment No. 101-1 This comment indicating support for the Project is noted for the record and will be forwarded to the decision-makers for review and consideration. City of Los Angeles Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan SCH. No. 2012011001 November 2014 Page III-879 WORKING DRAFT – Not for Public Review III.D Comment Letters Comment Letter No. 102 April M. Bujent 1601 Marine St. Santa Monica, CA 90405 Comment No. 102-1 My daughter is a student at Archer School for Girls, and I am writing to let you know that I support Archer’s Campus Preservation and Improvement plan, Archer Forward. The Archer Forward plan will allow the school to provide an even better education for Archer students, by adding modern classrooms, a regulation-size athletic field, a gymnasium and spaces for swim, performing and visual arts. Archer students are actively involved in the community: they volunteer at Brentwood Green, tutor students at Brentwood Science Magnet School, participate in local recycling and conservation efforts, volunteer at Daybreak Women’s Shelter and more. Archer has a great track record as a responsible neighbor in the community. For example, much time and energy has been poured into the school’s traffic control system. Every parent is well versed in parking and driving restrictions in the area during school hours, and we know that if we do not follow the rules there will be consequences. This is done out of Archer’s high level of consideration and respect for its neighbors, who don’t like sitting in traffic any more than I do. I believe that the Archer School for Girls is a valuable and upstanding member of the local community, and has done everything in its power to ensure that this plan presents every benefit possible to its neighbors. I hope you’ll help move this project quickly through the city’s process. Response to Comment No. 102-1 This comment indicating support for the Project is noted for the record and will be forwarded to the decision-makers for review and consideration. City of Los Angeles Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan SCH. No. 2012011001 November 2014 Page III-880 WORKING DRAFT – Not for Public Review III.D Comment Letters Comment Letter No. 103 Suzanne Bunzel 485 N. Bowling Green Way Los Angeles, CA 90049 Comment No. 103-1 I oppose the Archer Forward Plan as Proposed and recommend that the alternative be accepted. I’ve lived here for 54 years, and have been a member of BHA since it started. Now I have signed the Archer Neighbors Alternative Plan Petition and am writing you to urge your denial of the proposed Archer Expansion Plan. Response to Comment No. 103-1 This introductory comment expressing opposition to the Project is noted for the record and will be forwarded to the decision-makers for review and consideration. Refer to Topical Response No. 14, Residential Neighbors’ Proposed Alternative, for a detailed response to the alternative proposed by the Residential Neighbors of Archer. Specific comments regarding the Draft EIR are provided and responded to below. Comment No. 103-2 The traffic is already appalling and if the Archer proposal is accepted, it will make Brentwood and surrounding environs practically unlivable. Response to Comment No. 103-2 As described in Topical Response No. 10, Traffic Congestion Along Sunset Boulevard, traffic in the area of the Project has recently been improving as construction on the I-405 Sepulveda Pass Improvement Project has neared completion, with the opening of the HOV lane on the northbound I-405, and with substantial completion of the I-405/Sunset Boulevard interchange modifications. As further discussed in Topical Response No. 5, Additional Mitigation Measures to Eliminate Significant Traffic Impacts, in response to comments on the Draft EIR, additional operational mitigation measures are proposed to reduce the significant operational traffic impacts related to School Functions and Interscholastic Athletic Competitions to below a level of significance. City of Los Angeles Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan SCH. No. 2012011001 November 2014 Page III-881 WORKING DRAFT – Not for Public Review III.D Comment Letters Comment No. 103-3 I urge you to reject this proposal outright and accept the alternative plan proposed by the Residential Neighbors of Archer. Response to Comment No. 103-3 Refer to Topical Response No. 14, Residential Neighbors’ Proposed Alternative, for a detailed response to the alternative proposed by the Residential Neighbors of Archer. In response to comments on the Draft EIR, several of the modifications proposed by the Residential Neighbors of Archer have been incorporated into the Project. City of Los Angeles Archer Forward: Campus Preservation and Improvement Plan SCH. No. 2012011001 November 2014 Page III-882 WORKING DRAFT – Not for Public Review III.D Comment Letters Comment Letter No. 104 Tami Burks 5520 Eileen Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90043 Comment No. 104-1 I’m an incoming Archer parent and I am writing to show my support for the school’s campus plan Archer Forward. There are several independent schools to choose from in Los Angeles, but after coming to Archer and meeting its current students and the faculty and staff, I knew this was the right choice for my daughter. Archer is a [sic] innovative school that creates an atmosphere that encourages girls to take risks and try new things. In doing so, the girls realize their strengths and become leaders. The Archer faculty thinks outside of the box and caters their lessons to the way girls learn best. We know our child will thrive at Archer and we are excited to see the young woman she will become. The only thing that would make this school even better is if it had better facilities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Incline Project – Traffic Management Plan Update Updated: September 2, 2014
    City of Santa Monica Transportation Engineering & Management Division 1685 Main Street, Room 115 Santa Monica, CA 90401 California Incline Project – Traffic Management Plan Update Updated: September 2, 2014 Summary The demolition and reconstruction of the California Incline in Santa Monica is currently scheduled to begin in early 2015. Throughout the conceptual development and environmental study of the project, traffic congestion concerns and the requirements to manage and mitigate traffic congestion were at the forefront. The design for the project is currently in-progress, and a comprehensive traffic management plan is being developed. The traffic management plan consists of four core components: • Extensive deployment of traffic sensors and dynamic message boards to monitor real-time traffic conditions and provide real-time travel information. • Emphasis of detour routes to/from Downtown Santa Monica via the Moomat Ahiko ramp at Pacific Coast Highway and via the Lincoln Boulevard ramp at I-10. • Traffic counts will be collected at key locations immediately before and after the California Incline is closed in order to provide baseline traffic data. • Provision of as-needed traffic control devices and on-call support staff to address any congestion issues that occur, such as increased traffic in Santa Monica Canyon. Real-Time Traffic Monitoring and Information A total of 16 Bluetooth sensors and eight dynamic message boards will be deployed in key locations in order to monitor traffic conditions and report information to motorists in real-time, as shown on the figure below. One additional sensor may be deployed as-needed. Real-time information will also be transmitted to local news agencies, online travel applications, and in-vehicle navigation companies.
    [Show full text]
  • APA Conf Planners Guide.Indd
    2012 National Planning Conference Los Angeles Planner’s Guide Sponsors of the 2012 Planner’s Guide Conference Co-Chairs: Marissa Aho, AICP Generosity in the form of in-kind and monetary contributions from the following fi rms: Vince Bertoni, AICP Kurt Christiansen, AICP Anne McIntosh, AICP California Chapter President: Kevin Keller, AICP Los Angeles Section Director: Marissa Aho, AICP This guide book was prepared as a service to those attending the American Planning Association’s 2012 National Planning Conference in Los Angeles. Los Angeles Past Section Director: Special Thanks Kristen Asp, AICP The Planner’s Guide committee would like to extend special thanks to: Local Host Committee: Jessie Barkley – Local Host Events Jeanette Cappiello, Assistant Art Director, RBF Consulting, a company of Michael Baker Corporation, for her creative graphic design and layout of the Planners Guide. Francisco Contreras, AICP – Marketing and Merchandise Steve Gerhardt, AICP – Mobile Workshops Kate Gillespie, AICP, Owner and Principal, 3D Visions, for creating maps that allow us William Hoose – Local Host Events to navigate easily throughout the Los Angeles proper region. Susan Healy Keene, AICP - Local Host Events Ira Brown, Planner, City of Long Beach, for his outstanding photographs to John Keho, AICP - Local Host Events showcase the unique places, spaces, and buildings of the Los Angeles area. Jeff rey Lambert, AICP - AICP Workshop Ioana Ciurariu, City of Los Angeles, and Francisco Contreras, AICP, City of West Michael Laughlin, AICP – Mobile Workshops Hollywood, for their artistic inspiration and creation of the iconic Reimagine LA Nicholas Maricich – Orientation Tours 2012 Cover Artwork that captures the fun, spirit, and variety Los Angeles has to Collette Morse, AICP – AICP Workshop off er.
    [Show full text]
  • City Landmark Assessment Report, Palisades Park
    City Landmark Assessment Report Palisades Park West Side of 100-1500 Blocks, Ocean Avenue Santa Monica, California March 2007 City Landmark Assessment Report Palisades Park West Side of 100-1500 Blocks, Ocean Avenue Santa Monica, California Prepared for: City of Santa Monica Planning Division Prepared by: Margarita J. Wuellner, Ph.D. and Sonali Gupta- Agarwal, M.A. PCR Services Corporation 233 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 130 Santa Monica, California March 2007 Table of Contents Page BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................ 1 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................................ 1 Regulatory Setting ...................................................................................................................... 1 Alterations................................................................................................................................... 1 Research and Survey Methodology ............................................................................................ 2 Site Description......................................................................................................................... 10 Longitudinal Elements.............................................................................................................. 10 Area-specific Elements ............................................................................................................. 12 Individual
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Regular Meeting of the Board Wednesday, May 27, 2015 7:00–9
    Regular Meeting of the Board Wednesday, May 27, 2015 7:00–9:00 P.M. American Jewish University 15600 Mulholland Drive, Sperber Community Library, 2nd Floor, Main Bldg., Bel Air, CA 90077 Accessible from the west side of Casiano Road; park at lower parking (Lot 1) below the security kiosk Accommodations for Disabilities. As a covered entity under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Los Angeles does not discriminate on the basis of disability, and, upon request, will provide reasonable accommodation to ensure equal access to its programs, services, and activities. Sign language interpreters, listening devices, or other auxiliary aids and/or services will be provided upon request. To ensure availability of services, please make your request at least 3 business days prior to the meeting you wish to attend by contacting BABCNC Administrator, Cathy Palmer, at (310) 479-6247 or email [email protected]. Public Access to Documents. In compliance with California Government Code section 54957.5, non-exempt writings that are distributed to a majority or all of the board in advance of a meeting, may be viewed before the meeting at our website by clicking on www.babcnc.org or at the scheduled meeting. The QR code in the upper left hand of this page links to the Agenda and Minutes webpage for the Council. In addition, if you would like a copy of any record related to an item on the agenda, contact BABCNC Administrator, Cathy Palmer, 310-479- 6247 or email [email protected]. Notice of Meetings. The agenda is physically posted for public review at Bel Air Foods (formerly “Bel Air Market”), 2323 Roscomare Rd., 90077, Glen Center Postal Service 2934 1/2 N Beverly Glen Cir 90077, Laurel Canyon Country Store 2108 Laurel Canyon Blvd, 90046, Glen Market, 1603 N Beverly Glen Blvd., 90077 and/or Bel Air Bar & Grill, 662 North Sepulveda Blvd., 90049.
    [Show full text]
  • September 11, 2018 Santa Monica, California ORDINANCE NUMBER
    City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 Santa Monica, California ORDINANCE NUMBER 2587 (CCS) (City Council Series) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA AMENDING CHAPTER 3.12 AND SECTIONS 4.55.065 AND 10.08.460 OF THE SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL CODE TO CLARIFY AND UPDATE REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE OPERATION OF ELECTRIC BICYCLES, ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICES, ELECTRICALLY MOTORIZED BOARDS, LOW-SPEED VEHICLES, AND MOTORIZED SCOOTERS IN LOCATIONS INCLUDING THE BEACH-BIKE PATH, CITY PARKS AND THE MUNICIPAL PIER WHEREAS, the City of Santa Monica (City) maintains jurisdiction to enforce state and local traffic laws within City limits, including the portion of the Marvin Braude Coastal Bike Trail (“Beach Bike-Path”) within City limits; and WHEREAS, under state law, a motorized scooter may operate on a bicycle path or trail or bikeway, unless a local authority having jurisdiction over that path, trail, or bikeway prohibits that operation by ordinance; and WHEREAS, in recent months, in part due to rapid technological advancements, the City parks and the Beach Bike-Path specifically have been flooded with mobility devices, primarily motorized scooters; and WHEREAS, the rapid proliferation of mobility devices, primarily motorized scooters, creates safety hazards for pedestrians, bicyclists and mobility device users; and 1 WHEREAS, the Beach Bike-Path is a completely separated right-of-way designated principally for the use of bicycles with crossflows by motorists minimized; and WHEREAS, motorized scooters left in City parks and on the Beach Bike-Path, block paths of travel and create safety hazards, especially for persons with disabilities; and WHEREAS, even in the past few months, motorized scooters have been involved in a number of accidents, some resulting in serious injuries; and WHEREAS, the City desires to clarify traffic regulations as they pertain to the operation of mobility devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Log of Bridges on State Highways October, 2018 DISTRICT 07 07-LA-001
    October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS i October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS California Log of Bridges on State Highways Contents Bridge List Items and Keys to Coded Information...................................................ii County Table................................................................................................................v Alphabetic City Code Table.......................................................................................vi District Log..................................................................................................................1 Index of Bridge Numbers...........................................................................................I1 Prepared by California Department of Transportation Structure Maintenance & Investigations The information in this publication is available on the World Wide Web at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/structur/strmaint/brlog2.htm ii October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS BRIDGE LIST ITEMS AND KEYS TO CODED INFORMATION Postmile Entries in BOLD type show DISTRICT-COUNTY-ROUTE. Other entries show postmile prefix followed by postmile to the nearest hundredth of a mile. Prefixes of R, M, and N refer to re-aligned routes. Prefix L refers to a section or route paralleling another route. When the route is on the deck of the bridge, the postmile is recorded at the beginning of the structure (i.e. the lowest postmile on the bridge). When the route goes under the structure, the postmile is recorded on the underpassing route where
    [Show full text]
  • Draft EIS/EIR
    Final Construction and Mitigation Technical Report 4.0—Summary of Construction Methods, Techniques, and Equipment * Figure 4-27: Century City Station to Wilshire/Bundy WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION August 23, 2010 Page 4-61 Final Construction and Mitigation Technical Report 4.0—Summary of Construction Methods, Techniques, and Equipment 4.2.5.4 Maintenance Yards Division 20 Maintenance Yard This work appears to be essentially surface work in soils that have been exposed over the years to potentially contaminating influences of on-going equipment maintenance and storage. For this reason it is foreseen that excavated materials will be processed for re-use or disposed of at suitable dump sites. Since this yard is actively being utilized coordination of the work and delineation of permissible work areas will be a requirement. It is assumed that this will involve a structure far less complicated than that for an in-line station and would be a completely separate item of work. As such, it would have virtually no impact on the critical path as long as construction contracts are handled in a timely manner. Union Pacific Railroad – Los Angeles Transportation Center Rail Yard This work is essentially at the surface and involves a new, perhaps a singular, alignment from the Division 20 Maintenance yard northward into the north side of the Union Pacific Railroad Los Angeles Transportation Center Rail Yard. The alignment crosses over the Los Angeles River and an existing bridge which means that there will be an approach grade built into the abutment and the bridge crossing structure. This new alignment parallels existing and active track systems and therefore will require strict coordination of the work with train traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Area Disclosures Property Address: ______
    Local Area Disclosures Property Address: ______________________________________________________ The following disclosures are intended to provide buyer with information that may affect the subject property. Buyer is advised to consult with a specialist with regard to the impact any specific disclosure may have on the intended use of the property. Buyer may also contact the city council representative for the area where the property is located to obtain additional information. 1. Report of City Residential Records Regarding the Property: Buyer is advised that numerous cities in California, including without limitation, Los Angeles, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, and Culver City, require that prior to the close of escrow, Seller must deliver to Buyer, at Seller’s expense, a report regarding all records of the City with respect to the Property. If the Property is residential property located in the City of Los Angeles, a “Report of Residential Property Records and Pending Special Assessment Liens” in accordance with Los Angeles City Ordinance No. 144.942 (9A Report) is required. Buyer and Seller acknowledge that broker(s) is not responsible for the timely delivery of the required reports. 2. Los Angeles Impact Hazard Glazing: Buyer and Seller are aware that City of Los Angeles Ordinance No. 161.136 requires that all external sliding glass doors(the sliding part only) be tempered glass or “impact hazard glazed” with a safety film approved by the City of Los Angeles prior to the close of escrow. 3. Rent Control: Buyer is advised that the Property may be subject to a rent control or rent stabilization ordinance which among other things may require the registration of rental units and may govern the ability to evict tenants and provide for relocation fees for tenants.
    [Show full text]
  • Log of Bridges on State Highways
    October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS i October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS California Log of Bridges on State Highways Contents Bridge List Items and Keys to Coded Information...................................................ii County Table................................................................................................................v Alphabetic City Code Table.......................................................................................vi District Log..................................................................................................................1 Index of Bridge Numbers...........................................................................................I1 Prepared by California Department of Transportation Structure Maintenance & Investigations The information in this publication is available on the World Wide Web at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/structur/strmaint/brlog2.htm ii LO G OF BR IDGE S ON STA TE HIG HW A YSOctober, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYSOctober, BRIDGE LIST ITEMS AND KEYS TO CODED INFORMATION Postmile Entries in BOLD type show DISTRICT-COUNTY-ROUTE. Other entries show postmile prefix followed by postmile to the nearest hundredth of a mile. Prefixes of R, M, and N refer to re-aligned routes. Prefix L refers to a section or route paralleling another route. When the route is on the deck of the bridge, the postmile is recorded at the beginning of the structure (i.e. the lowest postmile on the bridge). When the route goes under the structure, the postmile
    [Show full text]
  • City Sets New Timeline for Downtown Community Plan
    THE SUMMER 2016 IN THIS ISSUE DCP............................................ 1 Minimum Wage.................... 2 Major Construction.............. 3 Expo Celebrations................. 4 New Noise Rules................... 6 Stop ’N Cafe Profile............. 7 Quarterly Ambassadors....... 8 Neighborhood Group........... 9 New Businesses................... 10 City sets new timeline for Downtown Community Plan he revised draft of the Downtown Community Plan oughly understanding and analyzing the policies that will (DCP), released in February, was scheduled to go go into the plan. Tbefore the City Council this summer. But the City of Santa Monica announced last month a new timeline for “We’re not planning for a sleepy beach town and we’re not community input and revisions to the draft and the DCP is planning for Manhattan,” Cole said. now set to go before Council in spring 2017. There are three key objectives with the “reboot” of the time- The DCP is intended to guide public and private investment line, Cole said. in Downtown Santa Monica for the next 20 years or longer. The first is that it is probably best to not do the debating City Manager Rick Cole decided to adjust the timeline to over the DCP this summer, in the middle of an election sea- ensure a full public outreach program aimed at engaging son. The second was to bring the community together and as many Santa Monicans as possible. make it stronger through allowing more time for the process of developing the plan. The third was to take the “This is a key planning document and we have to get it time to have a great plan, not a great document.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation of an Icon
    FORMATION OF AN ICON 1202 3rd Street Promenade | Santa Monica UNCOVERING THE FUTURE EXPERIENCE FUT- The opportunity presented by this space is a vivid reimagination of the retail and leisure experience EXPERIENCEURE MODERN LEGEND A VISION HISTORIC UNIQUE PRESERVATION OF ICON A space with celebrated past and historic CELEBRATEDWORLD-CLASS designation holds a clear path for unique styles and stories SUCCESS VISION LEGEND WORLD-CLASS STRATEGYLD- GLOBAL DESTINATION CLASS Visitors come far and wide to explore Santa Monica and make their way to the promenade ICONIC for California-style shopping and dining SANTA MONICA’S accessibility Parking Anchor Transportation Santa Monica, one of Los Angeles’ prime retail markets, continues to thrive as a popular beachfront neighborhood for residents, workers and tourists Ample public Major traffic at Just 5 blocks from alike. Located just below multiple state parks and stretching 3.5 miles parking in the area the corner of Wilshire the Metro Expo line along the Pacific coastline, Santa Monica, home to Third Street Promenade, Santa Monica Place, Santa Monica Pier and its carnival attractions, and the 10-block shopping district of Montana Ave, is not surprisingly one of the top tourist destinations within Los Angeles County. Santa Monica balances an exciting urban environment with recreational offerings like hiking in the Topanga Canyon trails or surfing in the Pacific. Consistently one of the highest performing streets in Los Angeles County in terms of number of sales and transactions, Third Street Promenade cannot be ignored as a major economic driver for Santa Monica and the overall Los Angeles region by drawing crowds to its premier pedestrian paseo.
    [Show full text]
  • 2618 2Nd Street Santa Monica, CA
    2618 2nd Street Santa Monica, CA $2,695,000 4.07% Current Capitalization Rate Turnkey Building Steps Away from World-Famous Santa Monica State Beach Table of Contents 3 Investment Summary ▪ The Opportunity ▪ Property Description ▪ Exterior and Interior Photos ▪ Aerial Photos 11 Market Overview ▪ Apartment Market Overview ▪ Places of Interest ▪ Silicon Beach Major Employers ▪ Nearby Developments ▪ Demographics 17 Financial Summary ▪ Pricing, Property and Operating Statement Summary ▪ Rent Roll ▪ Sales Comparables ▪ Sales Comparables Map ▪ Rent Comparables ▪ Rent Comparables Map John Swartz Josh Kaplan Copyright © 2021 Transwestern. California Brokerage License #01263636. The Managing Director Managing Director information in this offering memorandum was gathered by Transwestern from 213.430.2526 213.430.2538 sources believed reliable. Transwestern has not verified the information and [email protected] [email protected] makes no guarantee, warranty or representation about it. It is the potential buyer’s CA Lic 01873487 CA Lic 01934177 responsibility to independently confirm its accuracy and completeness. Any projections, opinions, assumptions or estimates used are for example only and Troy Lucero Transwestern Real Estate Services do not represent the current or future performance of the property. Potential Senior Associate 601 S. Figueroa St, Suite 3650 buyers and their advisors should conduct a careful, independent investigation of 213.457.1656 Los Angeles, CA 90017 the property to determine to their satisfaction the suitability of the property for [email protected] 213.624.5700 their needs. CA Lic 02015701 transwestern.com Investment Summary Transwestern as the exclusive listing agent is pleased to present the opportunity to acquire 2618 2nd Street, Santa Monica, California 90405, a 3-unit property comprised of a bungalow and a detached duplex located in Ocean Park submarket just 2 blocks from the ocean and within feet of Main Street/Downtown Santa Monica.
    [Show full text]