On Screen Presentation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Bob Diamond Chief Executive, Barclays PLC UBS Global Financial Services Conference, New York May 2012 Balanced performance across Barclays in Q1 Barclays Q1 2012 Total Income: £8,138m * Corporate Banking Retail and Business Banking £824m Investment Banking £1,077m UK £243m Europe £3,464m £3,140m £830m Africa £990m Barclaycard £451m Head Office & Other: £259m Wealth * Total Income net of Insurance and excluding own credit and gains on debt buybacks UBS Global Financial Services Conference, New York | May 2012 Execution priorities Capital, liquidity and funding Returns Income growth Citizenship UBS Global Financial Services Conference, New York | May 2012 Basel 3 Core Tier 1 ratio pro forma Core Tier 1 ratio under Basel 3 / CRD4 RWA effect Consensus from Basel 3 retained incl. mitigating Capacity for earnings Basel 2.5 actions £47bn RWA 1.6% 12.6% (1.6%) Basel 3 growth above Outstanding pre RWA a 10% CT 1 Basel 2.5 warrants growth ratio 10.9% 0.2% 11% (1%) 10.0% Mar 11 Dec 13 Dec 13 UBS Global Financial Services Conference, New York | May 2012 Execution priorities Capital, liquidity and funding Returns Income growth Citizenship UBS Global Financial Services Conference, New York | May 2012 Adjusted Return on Equity (RoE) by business 2011 FY RoE by business Q1 2012 RoE by business 14.9% UK RBB 15.0% (6.0)% Europe RBB (6.0)% 10.0% Africa RBB 10.2% 17.4% Barclaycard 19.6% 10.4% Investment Bank 17.0% 1.3% Corporate Banking 9.0% 10.9% Wealth & Investment 9.6% Management UBS Global Financial Services Conference, New York | May 2012 Income growth Examples: Barclaycard Africa Wealth and Investment Management Investment Banking UBS Global Financial Services Conference, New York | May 2012 Execution priorities Capital, liquidity and funding Returns Income growth Citizenship UBS Global Financial Services Conference, New York | May 2012 Bob Diamond Chief Executive, Barclays PLC UBS Global Financial Services Conference, New York May 2012 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Natwest, Lloyds Bank and Barclays Pilot UK's First Business Banking Hubs
NatWest, Lloyds Bank and Barclays pilot UK’s first business banking hubs NatWest, Lloyds Bank and Barclays have announced that they will pilot the UK’s first shared business banking hubs. The first hub will open its door in Perry Barr, Birmingham today. The pilot will also see five other shared hubs open across the UK in the coming weeks The hubs have been specifically designed to enable businesses that manage cash and cheque transactions to pay in large volumes of coins, notes and cheques and complete cash exchange transactions. They will be available on a trial basis to pre-selected business clients in each local area and will offer extended opening times (8am to 8pm) 7 days a week, providing business and corporate customers more flexibility to manage their day-to-day finances. The hubs will be branded Business Banking Hub and they have been designed to enable business customers from Natwest, Lloyds Bank and Barclays to conduct transactions through a shared facility. Commenting on the launch of the pilot, Deputy CEO of NatWest Holdings and CEO of NatWest Commercial and Private Banking Alison Rose said: “We have listened to what our business customers really want from our cash services. It is now more important than ever that we continue to offer innovative services, and we are creating an infrastructure that allows small business owners and entrepreneurs to do what they do best - run their business. I look forward to continued working with fellow banks to ensure the UK's businesses are getting the support they deserve." Commenting on the support this will provide businesses, Paul Gordon, Managing Director of SME and Mid Corporates at Lloyds Bank Commercial Banking said: “SMEs are the lifeblood of the UK economy.
[Show full text]
Web Updation FAQ's Version 3
FAQ’S for Barclaycard customers 1. Customer: How do I know when my Standard Chartered Bank Credit Card will become active? There is an Instructions letter with your new card that instructs the date on which your new Standard Chartered Bank Credit Card will become active and your Barclaycard will become inactive. A sms will also be sent to you before the activation of your new Standard Chartered Bank Credit Card. 2. Customer: I not received any card from Standard Chartered Bank after I received the Welcome Letter at the end of February 2012? We are dispatching cards in batches. You will receive an SMS from Standard Chartered Bank when your card is dispatched to you. The SMS will contain details of the Airway Bill No. of the courier which you can use to track your card. In case, you do not receive this SMS or your card by the 1st week of June, please write to Customer Care at [email protected] or call Standard Chartered Bank phone banking at the following numbers http://www.standardchartered.co.in/personal/ways-to-bank/en/phone-banking12.html 3. Customer: Do I need to give details about my account again or will it be transferred automatically? You do not need to do anything as all the information that is currently with Barclays bank will be transferred to Standard Chartered Bank in order to have your new card account set up. However if you have set up ECS/SI instructions on your current Barclaycard, then once you have received the new Standard Chartered Bank Credit Card please call the number at the back of your new Standard Chartered Bank Credit Card to provide ECS/SI instructions.
[Show full text]
Rating Action, Barclays Bank UK
Rating Action: Moody's takes rating actions on Barclays, Lloyds, Santander UK, Nationwide and Close Brothers, following update to banks methodology 13 Jul 2021 London, 13 July 2021 -- Moody's Investors Service (Moody's) has today taken rating actions on Barclays, Lloyds, Santander UK and Close Brothers banking groups and on Nationwide Building Society, including the upgrade of the long-term senior ratings of Lloyds Banking Group plc and Close Brothers Group plc. The rating actions were driven by revisions to Moody's Advanced Loss Given Failure (Advanced LGF) framework, which is applied to banks operating in jurisdictions with Operational Resolution Regimes, following the publication of Moody's updated Banks Methodology on 9 July 2021. This methodology is available at this link: https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1269625 . A full list of affected ratings and assessments can be found at the end of this Press Release. RATINGS RATIONALE Today's rating actions were driven by revisions to the Advanced Loss Given Failure framework within Moody's updated Banks Methodology: a revised notching guidance table, with thresholds at lower levels of subordination and volume in the liability structure have been applied to the UK banks and Additional Tier 1 (AT1) securities issued by banks domiciled in the UK have been included in the Advanced LGF framework, eliminating the previous analytical distinction between those high trigger instruments that were deemed to provide equity-like absorption of losses before the point of failure and other AT1 securities. Moody's removal of equity credit for high trigger Additional Tier 1 (AT1) instruments from banks' going concern capital means that affected banks have reduced capacity to absorb unexpected losses before the point of failure, everything else being equal.
[Show full text]
List of PRA-Regulated Banks
LIST OF BANKS AS COMPILED BY THE BANK OF ENGLAND AS AT 2nd December 2019 (Amendments to the List of Banks since 31st October 2019 can be found below) Banks incorporated in the United Kingdom ABC International Bank Plc DB UK Bank Limited Access Bank UK Limited, The ADIB (UK) Ltd EFG Private Bank Limited Ahli United Bank (UK) PLC Europe Arab Bank plc AIB Group (UK) Plc Al Rayan Bank PLC FBN Bank (UK) Ltd Aldermore Bank Plc FCE Bank Plc Alliance Trust Savings Limited FCMB Bank (UK) Limited Allica Bank Ltd Alpha Bank London Limited Gatehouse Bank Plc Arbuthnot Latham & Co Limited Ghana International Bank Plc Atom Bank PLC Goldman Sachs International Bank Axis Bank UK Limited Guaranty Trust Bank (UK) Limited Gulf International Bank (UK) Limited Bank and Clients PLC Bank Leumi (UK) plc Habib Bank Zurich Plc Bank Mandiri (Europe) Limited Hampden & Co Plc Bank Of Baroda (UK) Limited Hampshire Trust Bank Plc Bank of Beirut (UK) Ltd Handelsbanken PLC Bank of Ceylon (UK) Ltd Havin Bank Ltd Bank of China (UK) Ltd HBL Bank UK Limited Bank of Ireland (UK) Plc HSBC Bank Plc Bank of London and The Middle East plc HSBC Private Bank (UK) Limited Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited, The HSBC Trust Company (UK) Ltd Bank of Scotland plc HSBC UK Bank Plc Bank of the Philippine Islands (Europe) PLC Bank Saderat Plc ICBC (London) plc Bank Sepah International Plc ICBC Standard Bank Plc Barclays Bank Plc ICICI Bank UK Plc Barclays Bank UK PLC Investec Bank PLC BFC Bank Limited Itau BBA International PLC Bira Bank Limited BMCE Bank International plc J.P.
[Show full text]
Barclays Bespoke Disclosure Commodity Futures Trading Commission Rule 1.55(K)
BARCLAYS BESPOKE DISCLOSURE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION RULE 1.55(K) Barclays Bespoke Disclosure – v2.0 February 2021 COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION RULE 1.55(K): FCM-SPECIFIC DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Commission) requires each futures commission merchant (FCM), including Barclays Capital Inc. (BCI), to provide the following information to a customer prior to the time the customer first enters into an account agreement with the FCM or deposits money or securities (funds) with the FCM. Except as otherwise noted below, the information set out is as of December 31, 2019. BCI will update this information annually and as necessary to take account of any material change to its business operations, financial condition or other factors that BCI believes may be material to a customer’s decision to do business with BCI. Nonetheless, BCI’s business activities and financial data are not static and will change in non-material ways frequently throughout any 12-month period. NOTE: BCI is a subsidiary of Barclays Group US Inc. (BGUS), which is a subsidiary of Barclays US LLC (IHC LLC). The IHC LLC is an indirect parent entity of BCI and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Barclays Bank, PLC (BBPLC and together with its subsidiaries Barclays or the Group). BCI’s FCM business forms part of the Investment Banking division of Barclays Group (together with Barclays). Barclays is an international financial services provider engaged in personal banking, credit cards, corporate and investment banking and wealth management. Information that may be material with respect to BCI for purposes of the Commission’s disclosure requirements may not be material to BGUS, IHC LLC or BBPLC for purposes of applicable securities laws.
[Show full text]
Handelsbanken UK Risks Low Costs
Low credit Handelsbanken UK risks Low costs Local Satisfied Investor Presentation responsibility customers Nomura Conference SHB’s 21 November 2013 market Anders Bouvin, CEO UK Martin Blåvarg, Head of UK & US IR Handelsbanken’ s strengths . For the ppyast 41 years, the bank has had higgpher profitability than the average of its competitors . Since the first indeppyendent survey was made in 1989, Handelsbanken has had the highest level of customer satisfaction of the four largest banks in Sweden . For manyyy years, Handelsbanken has been one of the most cost-efficient universal banks in Europe with . lower administrative costs . lower loan losses . lower funding cost 2 Handelsbanken has six home markets Sweden 461 branches Norway 49 branches Finland 45 branches Denmark 55 branches Great Britain 166 branches * The Netherlands 16 branches * Per 6 November 2013, including recruited branch managers. Outside its home markets, the bank has operations in 28 locations in 18 countries : Branches: Representative offices: USA (New York) Poland (Warsaw) Beijing Sydney Singgpapore Austria (()Vienna) Kuala Lumpur Taipei Germany Estonia (Tallinn) Marbella Zürich France (Paris, Nice) Latvia (Riga) Moscow Greater China (Hong Kong, Shanghai) Lithuania (Vilnius) Mumbai Luxembourg São Paolo 3 Unchanged business model for 41 years Financial goal – focus on profitability To have a higher return on equity than a weighted average of comparable peers This goal has been reached for the last 41 consecutive years Decentralisation Non-negotiable . Credit policy The branch is the bank No bonus . Business control system . Responsibility and Accountability Customer Other key features . Focus on profitability – not volumes . Organic growth No central No budget marketing .
[Show full text]
What Can Banks Learn from Barclays, HSBC and Santander's Social
What can banks learn from Barclays, HSBC and Santander’s social media strategy? Contents Page 1. Introduction 3 2. Social media fails: Case studies 4 • When Hashtags go badly 5 • Keeping corporate aims in mind 6 3. An In depth Look at how UK banks use Twitter as part of their social media 7 strategy. • Banks – Getting it wrong 8 • Banks – Getting it right 9 • Banks – Dealing with complaints over social media 10 4. Tips on how to avoid social media blunders and save your customers. 11 • Common social media implementation mistakes 12 5. Your next step 15 2 Introduction Social media is used by the world’s biggest brands to reach out to customers, to say it is a new concept would be a lie. More accurately to say is that some financial companies are beginning to notice the benefits of having a competitive strategy for implementing social media best practices that ‘work alongside’ meeting the evolving needs of the customer, improving their experience and engaging with a younger demographic on their chosen platform. When implemented correctly social media can be a great tool in your arsenal, however when things go wrong – as they often do – there is nowhere to hide and that social media blunder is available for all to see. Using industry examples, this eBook focuses on effective ways to overcome the common pitfalls of tweeting, and presents top tips for maximising the social media strategy you already have in place and how you can learn from the mistakes of your peers. 3 Social media fails: Case studies Social media fails: Case study When Hashtags go badly When used correctly the twitter hashtag is a way to drive traffic to your page, rank on the trending page and build engagement.
[Show full text]
The Case of the HSBC and Barclays Plc, UK
School of Management Bleking Institute of Technology INVESTIGATING SHAREHOLDERS’ ECONOMIC VALUE CREATION IN THE BANKING INDUSTRY: - The case of the HSBC and Barclays plc, UK MBA Thesis by: Isaac Tettey Isaac Takyi Baffoe ID: 760831-P499 ID: 770627-P173 Supervisor: Professor Ian Robson THESIS FOR THE MASTER’S DEGREE IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION JUNE 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This paper analyses shareholders’ economic value creation using two major banks; HSBC and Barclays plc of UK within a five-year period (2003-2007). We use both internal and external information such as auditors’ annual financial reports, designed control variables, stock market data, etc to analyse business activities and practices of the banks and how they influence shareholders value on the stock market. We applied both the innovative (EVA) and traditional accounting (ROA and ROE) methods to measure their respective performances, regress it against stock market returns and other control values to understand their explanatory power especially to shareholders’ economic value. Our empirical results were mix: Though both innovative and traditional accounting methods do explain the variations of the stock returns for both HSBC and Barclays, the information content of EVA per equity is superior to the variations of Barclays’ stock market returns whiles return on asset (ROA) provides more explanation power to variations in the stock market returns for HSBC. At the comparative level both banks are creating values but Barclays provides higher average EVA per equity compare to HSBC. However Barclays operates under higher internal volatility which affects it performances measurements including stock market reactions and returns hence HSBC prove to be superior when shareholders measure them on risk-adjusted level.
[Show full text]
Numerical.Pdf
DTC PARTICPANT REPORT (Numerical Sort ) Month Ending - July 31, 2021 NUMBER PARTICIPANT ACCOUNT NAME 0 SERIES 0005 GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. LLC 0010 BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN & CO. 0013 SANFORD C. BERNSTEIN & CO., LLC 0015 MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC 0017 INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC 0019 JEFFERIES LLC 0031 NATIXIS SECURITIES AMERICAS LLC 0032 DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC.- STOCK LOAN 0033 COMMERZ MARKETS LLC/FIXED INC. REPO & COMM. PAPER 0045 BMO CAPITAL MARKETS CORP. 0046 PHILLIP CAPITAL INC./STOCK LOAN 0050 MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC 0052 AXOS CLEARING LLC 0057 EDWARD D. JONES & CO. 0062 VANGUARD MARKETING CORPORATION 0063 VIRTU AMERICAS LLC/VIRTU FINANCIAL BD LLC 0065 ZIONS DIRECT, INC. 0067 INSTINET, LLC 0075 LPL FINANCIAL LLC 0076 MUFG SECURITIES AMERICAS INC. 0083 TRADEBOT SYSTEMS, INC. 0096 SCOTIA CAPITAL (USA) INC. 0099 VIRTU AMERICAS LLC/VIRTU ITG LLC 100 SERIES 0100 COWEN AND COMPANY LLC 0101 MORGAN STANLEY & CO LLC/SL CONDUIT 0103 WEDBUSH SECURITIES INC. 0109 BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN & CO./ETF 0114 MACQUARIE CAPITAL (USA) INC. 0124 INGALLS & SNYDER, LLC 0126 COMMERZ MARKETS LLC 0135 CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC/INVESTMENT ACCOUNT 0136 INTESA SANPAOLO IMI SECURITIES CORP. 0141 WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES, LLC 0148 ICAP CORPORATES LLC 0158 APEX CLEARING CORPORATION 0161 BOFA SECURITIES, INC. 0163 NASDAQ BX, INC. 0164 CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC. 0166 ARCOLA SECURITIES, INC. 0180 NOMURA SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. 0181 GUGGENHEIM SECURITIES, LLC 0187 J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC 0188 TD AMERITRADE CLEARING, INC. 0189 STATE STREET GLOBAL MARKETS, LLC 0197 CANTOR FITZGERALD & CO. / CANTOR CLEARING SERVICES 200 SERIES 0202 FHN FINANCIAL SECURITIES CORP. 0221 UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
[Show full text]
UK High Street Banks Have Come Under Fire for Their Role in Causing the Economic Meltdown
UK high street banks have come under fire for their role in causing the economic meltdown. But the lack of regulation which led to the current crisis is also behind an even deadlier scandal. For years UK high street banks have been funding the arms trade, a lethal business which fuels conflict around the world, including Israel’s latest assault on Gaza. The arms industry profits directly from war, and provides the weapons which kill civilians and undermine development in the world’s poorest countries. War on Want is campaigning to end the UK banking sector’s complicity in the arms trade. With UK taxpayers now a majority shareholder in high street banks, there has never been a better time to stop this destructive practice once and for all. May 2009 Canary Wharf, where two of the UK’s largest banks, Barclays and HSBC, have their headquarters The arms industry is an industry unlike any Deadly investments other. It is responsible for producing the Original research by War on Want has revealed machines that maim or kill human beings and for the first time how UK high street banks provide wipe out whole communities – and it profits billions in funding and services to the largest arms from the destruction. The arms sector fuels manufacturers in the world. Each of the five major conflict, particularly in developing countries, high street banks – Barclays, HSBC, Royal Bank of which in turn leads to greater poverty and Scotland, Lloyds TSB and Halifax Bank of Scotland instability for millions across the globe. (now a subsidiary of Lloyds) – invests in, issues loans to and serves as principal banker for British Making a killing and international arms companies.
[Show full text]
Client Update Uk Court of Appeal Decides on “Commercial Reasonableness” in the Context of Determinations Made by Parties to Financial Instruments
CLIENT UPDATE UK COURT OF APPEAL DECIDES ON “COMMERCIAL REASONABLENESS” IN THE CONTEXT OF DETERMINATIONS MADE BY PARTIES TO FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS LONDON On 20 March 2014, the UK Court of Appeal handed down its decision Tony Dymond in Barclays Bank Plc v Unicredit Bank AG [2014] EWCA Civ 302. The [email protected] appeal concerned the construction of a clause requiring a party to Sophie Lamb make a determination in a “commercially reasonable manner” in [email protected] deciding whether to consent to optional early termination. Kevin Lloyd [email protected] The case concerned a “synthetic securitisation” and is particularly relevant to financial institutions, but it also has broader application to Ralph Sellar the interpretation of commercial contracts. The case is a useful [email protected] reminder that, unless exceptional circumstances apply, the courts will give effect to the ordinary meaning of the words of contractual provisions, especially where the parties in question can “look after their own interests and contract on different terms if they wish to do so”. In this update we pick out some of the key issues. KEY POINTS . It was the “manner” of the determination which must be commercially reasonable; it did not follow that the outcome had to be commercially reasonable. But commercially unreasonable outcomes would cause the manner of the determination to be subjected to greater scrutiny. A party required to make a determination in a “commercially reasonable manner” is entitled to take account of its own commercial interests in preference to the interests of the counterparty. A “commercially reasonable” determination is a control on the deciding party.
[Show full text]
The Recent Evolution of the UK Banking Industry and Some Implications for Financial Stability
The recent evolution of the UK banking industry and some implications for financial stability Alex Bowen, Glenn Hoggarth and Darren Pain 1. Introduction The UK financial system experienced significant structural change during the 1970s and 1980s. Before then the system was segmented. Different institutions existed to provide the differentiated services of commercial banking, investment banking, housing finance, life assurance, fund management and securities trading. Within the banking sector, there was a clear demarcation between clearing banks which provided commercial banking facilities and money transmission services largely to domestic customers, investment banks which provided a range of largely market intermediated financial services to both domestic and overseas corporate clients such as equity issuance and portfolio investment advice, and building societies which were the main source for housing finance. These demarcations were maintained by various forms of official regulation such as exchange controls and lending constraints (including credit ceilings), which served to restrict competition and thus impart stability to the oligopolistic structure of the market. Changes to the institutional architecture took place progressively over the 1970s and 1980s. This was largely an evolutionary process, but a number of factors contributed to an intensification of competition and tended to erode the functional distinctions between firms. Five in particular are worth noting. First, the entry of foreign banks, associated with the continued growth in the eurodollar market and London's prominent role in this market, prompted the major clearing banks to expand their businesses into non-traditional markets such as corporate and unsecured lending. Initially, this was typically achieved through acquisitions in order to circumvent existing credit control regulations.
[Show full text]