Andrew Coates
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
What Next? Marxist Discussion Journal 31 Trotsky, Ecology and Sustainability ! Anti-Fascism in the 1970s: A Case Study ! Is the BNP a Fascist Party? A Debate ! AWL and Imperialism ! In Defence of Secularism ! The Right, the Left and ‘Free Expression’ ! The Errors of Sam Harris ! What Happened in the Spanish Civil War? ! The‘Spirit of Petrograd’? The 1918 and 1919 Police Strikes CONTENTS What Next? No.31 2007 Contributors THE PROPHET MISARMED: TROTSKY, ECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABILITY Sandy Irvine is a former member Sandy Irvine ........................................................ 1 of the International Socialists, briefly served on the first national THE RESPECTABLE REVOLUTIONARIES: executive of the Green Party and LEAMINGTON ANTI-RACIST ANTI-FASCIST teaches at a sixth-form college in COMMITTEE 1977-1981 the North East Doug Lowe ........................................................ 23 IS THE BNP NAZI? NO, IT’S WORSE: IT ISN’T Doug Lowe is a member of Andrew McKibben ............................................ 26 UNISON (Northern Devon Healthcare Branch) and did a SUITED AND JACKBOOTED: BEHIND THE HYPE 5-year stint a long time ago in THE BNP ARE STILL A FASCIST PARTY Leamington SWP Ben Drake ......................................................... 28 Andrew McKibben is an anti- WHY THE BNP IS STILL FASCIST racist who lives in Glasgow Geoffrey Brown ................................................ 29 Ben Drake is Branch Secretary of AWL, IMPERIALISM AND LIES York City UNISON and Chair of Tony Greenstein ............................................... 33 York Unite Against Fascism AN ENLIGHTENED RESPONSE TO IAN BIRCHALL Geoffrey Brown is a member of Andrew Coates ................................................. 37 the Labour Party and Unite Against Fascism THE RIGHT, THE LEFT AND ‘FREE EXPRESSION’ Martin Sullivan ................................................. 39 Tony Greenstein is a member of the Alliance for Green Socialism A KICK UP THE ’ARRIS and lives in Brighton Doug Lowe ........................................................ 49 Andrew Coates is a socialist and WHAT HAPPENED IN THE SPANISH CIVIL WAR? secularist living in Ipswich who has Jim Creegan ..................................................... 62 been active on the French left THE ‘SPIRIT OF PETROGRAD’? THE 1918 AND 1919 POLICE STRIKES Martin Sullivan is a member of Owen Jones ...................................................... 67 the Labour Party and posts regularly on Islamophobia Watch REVIEWS ...................................................... 78 Jim Creegan spent over fifteen years in the American New Left LETTER ......................................................... 83 and Trotskyist movements. He now lives in New York City, and can be reached at [email protected] We welcome letters, articles and reviews. Owen Jones is co-chair of the Please send to [email protected] Socialist Youth Network, which or to 24 Georgiana Street London NW1 0EA. fights for socialist ideas within the Labour Party The Prophet Misarmed: Trotsky, Ecology and Sustainability Sandy Irvine Leon Trotsky showed great insight on many issues but, argues Sandy Irvine, his biggest blind spot concerned ecological sustainability, now the greatest issue of our times. His thinking reflected the technological cornucopianism that bedevils the socialist tradition. Unless addressed it threatens to render the movement unable to address today’s primary challenge. T IS a tribute to Leon Trotsky’s standing that for the wishful thinking that led Trotsky to believe I his ideas are still widely discussed. If the number it opportune to declare a new international move- of ex-members as well as actual supporters of ment, the so-called Fourth International. His tend- avowedly and quasi-Trotskyist groups were to be ency to see every political setback as but a crisis of counted, the total would reveal an army of people leadership is also much disparaged for its over- who, to some extent at least, have been influenced simplicity. by his thought and deeds. It is not a question of It is argued here that Trotsky both reflected numbers per se. Many leading figures in contem- and encouraged an even worse tendency amongst porary anti-globalisation, anti-racism and “stop the radical Left, namely an almost total myopia the war” movements are Trotskyists in the broad- about the most significant of all developments in est sense of the word. Many apolitical citizens are the 20th century, the ecological crisis. It is the most aware of his struggle with Stalin and subsequent serious, all-embracing challenge of our times. Glo- fate. The David and Goliath quality of this battle bal overwarming is only one of many symptoms only adds interest.1 of dangerous planetary disorder. Not only did However, discussion of his life and legacy tends Trotsky fail to anticipate the most serious failing to stick to well-worn contours of debate. Hostile in the dominant social and economic order, he critics focus on his alleged role in building a Bolsh- actually endorsed technologies, lifestyle choices evik dictatorship which, it is further argued, was and policy goals that could only serve to increase ready and waiting for Stalin to take over. Some- the unsustainable impact of humankind on the times the criticism focuses specifically on his role Earth’s life-support systems. (The threat from nu- in the Russian Civil War and his desire to militar- clear war will not be discussed since, fortunately, ise the workforce. His role in the suppression of it remains only a possibility whereas ecological the 1921 Kronstadt mutiny invites particular con- meltdown is an actuality.) demnation. Admirers, however, praise his role in the Bolshevik seizure of power, his leadership of Trotsky as case study the Red Army in defence of the Revolution and The following study focuses on one person. In his relentless opposition to not just Stalin himself doing so, it also comments on the more general but also the state bureaucracy on which Stalinism socialist tradition, especially its Marxist variant rested. of which he was a leading representative. Trotsky Trotsky’s intellectual endeavours also arouse provides a particularly good case study. Whatever passionate disputation. Some object to his rather his failings, he was a very intelligent man. His hagiographical writings on Lenin and his some- writings on literature and other arts show great times crude evocation of materialist dialectics. subtlety. He demonstrated immense foresight on Amongst Marxists of a more independent hue, many issues, especially the threat from Fascism. there has been considerable criticism of his theoris- In his early political career, he perceptively warned ing about the nature of Stalinist Russia (a “workers’ of the dangers of excessive centralism in political state”, albeit much degenerated). The same goes organisations. In short, Trotsky combined re- 1 markable erudition with often sharp perception. example, Herodotus observes that “man stalks His ecological blind spot was not some personal across the landscape and deserts follow in his foot- failing but the product of a whole political tradition steps”. Not long after, Plato had bemoaned the that, in this respect at least, was gravely flawed. tide of human destructiveness. There was also Unless corrected, this ecological blinkeredness will Epicurus who clearly enunciated the conservation make it as irrelevant as more conventional politics, principles that make a nonsense of the still widely no matter what sensible things socialist activists held delusion that we can get more from less, or might say about specific matters such as the better that technology will create resources out of thin funding of public services, job security, protection air or make wastes magically disappear. of citizen rights, militarism and the closing of the In Trotsky’s own lifetime, the American dust- wealth-poverty gap. bowl disaster of the 1930s had affected millions. It Any discussion of Trotsky’s thinking must was widely publicised through studies like Deserts start from what, realistically, he could have known on the March by Paul Sears (1935) and by “New at the time. It needs to be noted immediately that Deal” photographers such as Dorothea Lange and there was already a body of thought that recognis- Arthur Rothstein (who snapped the famous “Fath- ed the dangerous road down which humankind er and sons in dust storm” image). Geographers was travelling in his own lifetime. Those who did such as Carl Sauer were also charting human de- not see this must, therefore, be judged myopic. struction of wildlife, while human depletion of There are no grounds for the rather lame excuse resources was being highlighted by ornitholog- that people back then could not have known what ist William Vogt and zoologist Fairfield Osborn. only now we are able to understand. There were There was growing awareness, amongst histor- prescient individuals who certainly managed to ians at least, of much older human “own goals”, see what Trotsky did not. as marked by the ecological suicide of civilisations Some came from the socialist movement itself. as diverse as ancient Sumeria, the Roman Empire, Actually, back in the 19th century, Karl Marx had Angkor Wat and Easter Island. spotted some danger signs of human abuse of the Conversely, efforts to protect environmental environment. He particularly highlighted the systems were already being made, albeit ones too threat from soil erosion. Marx also criticised the weak to resist the tide of further destruction. It