DOCSLIB.ORG

UNLV, Entitled Maintenance Cost Study • Basic Channel Conveyance, Culverts, and • All Practices Must Be in Compliance with Drainage Structures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & PLANNINGLV RESEARCH INCLUDES US 95 FROM THE CLARK COUNTY LINE WEST OF INDIAN SPRINGS NORTH TO I-80 AT TRINITY, US 6 CORRIDOR PLAN FROM THE CALIFOR- NIA STATE LINE EAST TO WARM SPRINGS, US 50 FROM SIX MILE Central US 95, West US 6, and Central US 50 CANYON ROAD NEAR DAYTON EAST TO NEW PASS SUMMIT, ALT 95 THROUGH landscape and aesthetics corridor plan YERINGTON AND ALT 50 DESIGN WORKSHOP PLACES Sand County Studios JW Zunino & Associates CH2MHill December 15, 2006 Endorsement Central US 95, West US 6, and Central US 50 corridor plan MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR OF NEVADA MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR OF NDOT On June 6, 2002, the Nevada Department of Transportation adopted NDOT is responsible for ensuring that landscape and aesthetics as policy, “Pattern and Palette of Place: A Landscape and Aesthetics are an integral part of the design in building and retrofitting our Master Plan for the Nevada State Highway System.” The second highway system. This Landscape and Aesthetics Corridor Plan for phase of planning is complete. The Landscape and Aesthetics Cor- US 95, US 6, and US 50 in Central Nevada helps realize our vision ridor Plan represents a significant step forward for the Landscape for the future appearance of our highways. The plan will provide and Aesthetics program created by the Master Plan because it in- the guidance for our own design teams, and it will help Nevada’s volves local public agencies and citizens in the planning process. citizens participate in formulating context-sensitive solutions for Now, Nevada’s highways truly represent the state and its people. today’s transportation needs. Together, we will ensure our high- The Corridor Plan will be the primary management tool for use in ways reflect Nevada’s distinctive heritage, landscape, and culture. guiding funding allocations, promoting appropriate aesthetic de- sign, and providing for the incorporation of highway elements that uniquely express Nevada’s landscape, communities, and cities, as well as its people. The State considers this Corridor Plan to be a major accomplishment for the future of Nevada highways. III Central US 95, West US 6, and Central US 50 corridor plan Endorsement ENDORSEMENT The Corridor Plan has been reviewed by the following groups and agencies. Endorsement means agreeing in principle with the opportunities and recommendations identified within agency jurisdiction. Beatty Habitat Committee Lyon County Building Department Beatty Museum & Historical Society Mineral County Development Corporation Beatty Town Advisory Board Natural Resources Conservation Service, High Desert Resources Beatty Town Office Conservation District Churchill County Road Department Nevada Silver Trails City of Fernley Nye County City of Yerington Nye County Natural Resources Office Economic Development Authority - Esmeralda / Nye Counties Nye County Road Department Esmeralda County Silver Springs Chamber of Commerce Esmeralda County Yucca Mountain Oversight Tonopah Development Corporation Fallon Convention & Tourism Authority Tonopah Historic Mining Park Advisory Board Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe Town of Tonopah Fernley Chamber of Commerce Town of Walker Lake Goldfield Chamber of Commerce Walker Lake Working Group Goldfield Welcome Center Walker River Paiute Tribal Council Lahontan Valley Environmental Alliance Yerington Paiute Tribe Luning Advisory Board Yomba Shoshone Tribe Lyon County IV Acknowledgements Central US 95, West US 6, and Central US 50 corridor plan ACKOWLEDGEMENTS Nevada Department of Transportation State Transportation Board Rand Pollard - Assistant Chief of Road Design Engineer Lucy Joyce-Mendive - Landscape Architect Supervisor Kenny C. Guinn (Chairman) Governor Janice Ellis - Assistant Landscape Architect Kathy Augustine Controller Ron Blakemore - Former Landscape Architect Supervisor Caesar Caviglia Member Tom Gust Member Lorraine Hunt Lt. Governor University of Nevada Las Vegas Landscape Architecture and Brian Sandoval Attorney General Planning Research Office Jim Thornton Member Mark Elison Hoversten - Professor, FASLA, AICP Susan Jones - Research Associate, ASLA STTAC (Statewide Transportation Technical Advisory Committee) Brian Pugh - Research Assistant, ASLA Audrey Allan Vincent Guthreau Tom Brady Sig Jaunarajs Consultant Team Steve Bunnell Mara Jones Denis Cederburg Charlie Kajkowski (Vice-Chair) Design Workshop Daryl Crawford Clara Lawson Richard W. Shaw - Principal, FASLA Keyth Durham Patrick Pittenger Steve Noll - Principal, ASLA Paul Enos Marc Reynolds (Chair) Stephanie Grigsby - Associate, ASLA Jon Ericson Jonna Samsom Kristofer Johnson - Landscape Designer David Fraser Bruce Turner Eric Roverud - Landscape Designer Debra Goodwin Steve Weaver Laura Miller - Landscape Designer Christopher Walsh - Landscape Designer Laurie Ann Grimes Elizabeth Scott - Landscape Designer, ASLA Technical Review Committee Anna Gagne - Planner Julie McGrew - Landscape Designer Alvin Moyle Jack Honeycutt Susan Keller Smith Devon Morgan - Graphic Designer Angela Haag Jim Marble Tamara Sandvik Lisa McGuire - Graphic Designer Bert Bertram John Hicks Teri Knight Rebecca Leonard - Planner Bill Kirby Kay Bennett Virginia Ridgway Nino Pero - Website Designer Charles Nixon Lesa Cagle Kelan Smith - Environmental Graphics Dave Ferguson Linda Tarvydas Casti- Dori Johnson - Executive Assistant Dave Spicer more Jen Tarbet - Project Specialist Dennis Bill Lorrie Chase Donna Kristaponis Margaret Ruckman PLACES Doug Baker Maxine Makinster Barbara Santner - Landscape Architect and Planner, ASLA, AICP Douglas Pope Michael O’Conner Kathie Brinkerhoff - Landscape Designer Durk Pearson Paula Elefante Susan Leuscher - Landscape Architect in Training Fred Satala Pauline LaVoie Gary Atkerson Rick Gray Sand County Studio George McCorkell RJ Gillum James Sipes - Landscape Architect and Digital Database Development, Glenn Bunch Rob Loveberg ASLA Heidi Bertolino Robert Boyce James Eason Ron Wolven JW Zunino Janet Sanderson Sandi Stanio Jack Zunino - Principal, FASLA Janet Rogers Shelagh Davis Geoffrey Schafler - Landscape Coordinator, ASLA Jean Peterson Ron Davis Jeannete Dahl Shirley Harlan CH2MHill Cindy Potter - Civil Engineer, Principal, P.E. V Central US 95, West US 6, and Central US 50 corridor plan Executive Summary USER’S GUIDE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY scape design segments: Mojave Desert Vista, Sil- Chapter Four summarizes the cost implications ver Legends, Great Basin Oasis and Pony Express associated with the improvements proposed by • Refer to the section beginning on This plan establishes the vision for the landscape Passage. A description of the theme and design this Corridor Plan. Cost estimates are included for page 1.5 to understand softscape and and aesthetics of the Central US 50, West US 6, objectives presents examples of the appropriate both preliminary project budgeting as well as on- hardscape types and treatments. and Central US 50 corridor. The vision synthesiz- design aesthetic for each segment. Additionally, going project maintenance. These estimates will • Refer to the introduction and section es historic, current, and future conditions into a maps and sections of the landscape design seg- inform NDOT in the decision-making process, and one beginning on page 2.1 to under- comprehensive guide to improve the visual ap- ments provide detail regarding the location of help influence budget allocations for the land- stand how the corridor is organized pearance of the highway corridors through com- specific projects and the desired level of aesthetic scape and aesthetics highway improvements. into highway zones. munities, rural landscapes, and scenic environ- treatment. ments. The remaining chapters provide information that • Refer to the sections two through five beginning on page 2.13 for the design Chapter Three begins by outlining an approach to will help readers understand the technical infor- theme and design objectives related The first chapter of this report provides an intro- the design process. This process highlights the ne- mation presented in the document. to each landscape design segment. duction to the NDOT Landscape and Aesthetics cessity of integrating landscape and aesthetics at program. It describes the mechanism by which the beginning of every project. Design guidelines • Refer to pages 2.20, 2.33, 2.47 and 2.54 corridor design will be managed, a description of are also included in the third chapter to provide for design interpretation. programs and elements that influence highway the framework for improving the aesthetics of aesthetics, and a summary of background infor- existing, new, and retrofit highway projects. They • Refer to the section beginning on page 3.2 for design guidelines. mation gathered and analyzed. are written statements of recommended meth- ods to meet the segment’s design objectives. The • Refer to the section beginning on page Chapter Two describes the process through guidelines, accompanied by concept diagrams, 3.21 for color palette information. which sections of the highway were categorized sketches, or photographs, demonstrate ways in into highway zones and divided into distinct land- which to achieve the design intent. • Refer to pages 3.39 – 3.47 for plant pal- ettes associated with each softscape treatment type. • Refer to the section beginning on page 4.14 for the description of funding and costs. • Refer to the section beginning on page 4.16 for project priorities. VI Table of Contents Central US 95, West US 6, and Central US 50 corridor plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE: CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT
Recommended publications
  • Geodesy and Contemporary Strain in the Yucca Mountain Region, Nevada

    Geodesy and Contemporary Strain in the Yucca Mountain Region, Nevada

    Geodesy and Contemporary Strain in the Yucca Mountain Region, Nevada By W.R. Keefer, J.A. Coe, S.K. Pezzopane, anofW. Clay Hunter U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 97-383 Prepared in cooperation with the NEVADA OPERATIONS OFFICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (Interagency Agreement DE-AI08-92NV10874) Denver, Colorado 1997 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: Chief, Earth Science Investigations Program U.S. Geological Survey Yucca Mountain Project Branch Information Services U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286 Box 25046, Mail Stop 421 Federal Center Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Denver, CO 80225-0046 CONTENTS Abstract................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .............................................................................. 1 Background and Piirpose...........................................................................................................................................^ 1 Geologic Setting ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Geodetic
  • The Road to Iconicity in the Pa- Leoart of the American West

    The Road to Iconicity in the Pa- Leoart of the American West

    ekkehart malotkI The Road to Iconicity in the Pa- leoart of the American West Introduction Throughout the world, all paleoart traditions considered to be the earliest uniformly display a remarkable noniconicity, whether they occur as port- able objects or in the context of rock art. This uniformity is believed to be attributable not to cultural difusion but to an evolved, predisposing neuro- biology shared by all human beings. This panglobal similarity of the most basic phosphene-like motif repertoires also holds for the Pleistocene-Hol- ocene transition period in the American West. From Canada to Northwest Mexico and from Texas to the Paciic Coast, canyon walls, boulder faces and rock shelters served as canvases for the arriving Paleoamericans and their descendants. Their non-igurative, geocentric marking systems, summar- ily labeled here Western Archaic Tradition (Fig. 1), lasted for thousands of years until in very limited areas full-blown iconicity in the form of distinct biocentric styles set in around the Middle Holocene (Fig. 2). Many regions, however, remained committed to the graphic Western Archaic Tradition mode until A. D. 600 or later or never developed representational motifs. Preceding the onset of imagery featuring anthropomorphs and zoomorphs, a seemingly restricted vocabulary of igurative designs –, primarily animal and bird tracks as well as hand- and footprints – that can be regarded as proto-iconic forerunners along the developmental path of rock art, observ- able in the American West. 171171 ekkehart malotkI Fig. 1: Typical WAT petroglyphs from a site north of St. George, Utah (photograph E. Malotki). Fig. 2: Typical »biocentric« style imagery of the Middle/Late Holocene that marks an ideo- logical shift from the long-lasting noniconic rock art of the WAT (photograph E.
  • The Museum of Northern Arizona Easton Collection Center 3101 N

    The Museum of Northern Arizona Easton Collection Center 3101 N

    MS-372 The Museum of Northern Arizona Easton Collection Center 3101 N. Fort Valley Road Flagstaff, AZ 86001 (928)774-5211 ext. 256 Title Harold Widdison Rock Art collection Dates 1946-2012, predominant 1983-2012 Extent 23,390 35mm color slides, 6,085 color prints, 24 35mm color negatives, 1.6 linear feet textual, 1 DVD, 4 digital files Name of Creator(s) Widdison, Harold A. Biographical History Harold Atwood Widdison was born in Salt Lake City, Utah on September 10, 1935 to Harold Edward and Margaret Lavona (née Atwood) Widdison. His only sibling, sister Joan Lavona, was born in 1940. The family moved to Helena, Montana when Widdison was 12, where he graduated from high school in 1953. He then served a two year mission for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In 1956 Widdison entered Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah, graduating with a BS in sociology in 1959 and an MS in business in 1961. He was employed by the Atomic Energy Commission in Washington DC before returning to graduate school, earning his PhD in medical sociology and statistics from Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio in 1970. Dr. Widdison was a faculty member in the Sociology Department at Northern Arizona University from 1972 until his retirement in 2003. His research foci included research methods, medical sociology, complex organization, and death and dying. His interest in the latter led him to develop one of the first courses on death, grief, and bereavement, and helped establish such courses in the field on a national scale.
  • Mercury Bowling Alley Demolition

    Mercury Bowling Alley Demolition

    MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION NEVADA FIELD OFFICE, AND THE NEVADA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER REGARDING THE DEMOLITION OF THE MERCURY BOWLING ALLEY, NEVADA NATIONAL SECURITY SITE, NEVADA WHEREAS, the National Nuclear Security Administration Nevada Field Office (NNSA/NFO) intends to demolish the Mercury Bowling Alley (Building 23-517) on the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) in Nye County, Nevada, as part of its plans for new construction and modernization of Mercury to support the NNSS's changing role in national security; and WHEREAS, the present undertaking consists of the demolition of Building 23-517 (SHPO Resource Number B 14451) that has remained vacant since the mid-i 990s following the end of nuclear testing activities at the NNSS (formerly Nevada Test Site [NTS]). In planning for the undertaking, NNSA/NFO considered all possible alternatives to avoid and minimize adverse effects to historic properties; and WHEREAS, theNNSA/NFO has defined the undertaking's area of potential effect (APE) as a 4.5-acre area in Mercury bounded on the west by the Mercury Highway, on the east by Teapot Street, on the south by Trinity Avenue, and on the north by a prominent terrace immediately south of a parking lot, park, and tennis/basketbatl court (Attachment A); and WHEREAS, the NNSA/NFO recorded and evaluated Building 23-517 (Attachment A) En accordance with the Nevada ArchUectvral Survey and Inventory Guidelines, and has determined that Building 23-517 is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under the Secretary's Significance Criteria A and C at the locai level of historic significance related to the era of nuclear testing; and WHEREAS, the NNSA/NFO has determined that the undertaking will constitute an adverse effect to the historic property Building 23-517, and has consulted with the Nevada Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) pursuant to 36 C.F.R.
  • Bureau of Land Management Manages 270 Million Acres of Public Lands in the \\"Est and What We Learn About Past People and How They Adapted to Their Alaska

    Bureau of Land Management Manages 270 Million Acres of Public Lands in the \\"Est and What We Learn About Past People and How They Adapted to Their Alaska

    ·suoptUaua8 aimnJ JOJ .\ofua no.\ saJJnosai aqJ 3AB31 sn d1aq asB<Jid 1l()C)-)LL L0£ £00Z8 AM. 'auuakiq:) 8Z81 xog "O"d anuaAy ua.l.fll.M )l)Z ~UJWOA.M. lZOV-6£) 108 rn£z-mvs m '-<lD a)\lll. ltllS IO£ al!nS '"llPIH "JD 'trnU!d Sd:) l;i;)JlS alinS rnnos ti£ LSZL -OSZ £OS )96Z-80ZL6 ~0 'ptrn\µOd !>96Z XOH "O"d anuaAy qltt ·g-N 00£1 UO~<lJO 91£9-886 sos 6ttliiO!>L8 WN 'ail intrns 6ttl xog "O"d "llPIH tllJapaiJ pm~ a;,!JJO lSOd QZ[ OJJX<lW M<lN 00£9-8Z£ WL 9000-QZ)68 AN 'oua~ OOOZl xog "O"d A'Bh\ pIDAmH 0)8 8pBA<lN £16Z-!>!>Z 90I' LOI6!> .LW 'sllUffi!H 0089£ XOH "O"d l;i;)JlS PUZ£ N zzz uumuow 000£1'8£ soi 90L£8 GI 'aS!OH a;,-eJJa.L 'Btrn;)µawy 08££ oqBpJ OL9£-6£Z £0£ )[ZQ8 Q:) 'pooMa:l{tq l;i;)JlS ppyllunox 0!>8Z opmo103 9VLV-8L6 916 )Z8)6 Y:) 'OlUaW'Bl;)'BS 1vsz-3 '-<-e.M all-eno:) oosz BJWOJJ18:) 170!>!>-QP<J ZOCJ I T0!>8 zy 'iquaoqd £9)9[ X08 "Q"d l;i;iJlS qlL "N LOL£ suozµv ))))-[lZ L06 66)L-£I)66 )JV' 'all-emq;,uy £!# 'anuaAy qlL ".M zzz BlfSBIV :saJ!JJO aJBJS W'UI asaq1 PBJUOJ 'lsnd aqJ D! saimuaApy JOOQE UO!JEWJOJU! aJOW JO..{ The Bureau of Land Management Manages 270 million acres of public lands in the \\"est and what we learn about past people and how they adapted to their Alaska.
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey

    United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GUIDEBOOK FOR PAST FIELD TRIPS TO THE NEVADA TEST SITE by R. L* Christiansen, F. G. Poole, Harley Barnes, P. P. Orkild, F. M. Byers, Jr., W. J. Carr, F. A. McKeown, F. N. Houser, E. M. Shoemaker, and W. L. Emerick Open-file Report 1969 69 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey standards and nomenclature. CONTENTS Page General Introduction, by Robert L. Christiansen. ........ 1 Paleozoic Stratigraphy and post-Paleozoic tectonic structure of Nevada Test Site and Vicinity, by F. G. Poole and Harley Barnes. ........................ 2 Timber Mountain Caldera and Related Volcanic Rocks, by Robert L. Christiansen, Paul P. Orkild, F. M. Byers, Jr., and W. J. Carr ........................ 24 Engineering Geology and Surface Effects of Nuclear Explosions, by F. A. McKeown, F. N. Houser, E. M. Shoemaker, and W. L. Emerick. ........................ 47 GENERAL INTRODUCTION A wide variety of geological studies has been undertaken by the U.S. Geological Survey at the Nevada Test Site since 1957 in cooperation with the Nevada Operations Office of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. This book has been prepared as a guide to some of the major results of the Survey's studies in this area and has been*divided into three topically oriented field trips. In several respects the Nevada Test Site is located in an area that is especially interesting geologically. It lies along the projected trend of the Walker Lane and the Las Vegas Valley Shear Zone (Locke and others, 1940; Longwell, 1960), one of the major crustal features of the Basin-Range province.
  • Estimated Potentiometric Surface of the Death Valley Regional Groundwater Flow System, Nevada and California by Michael T

    Estimated Potentiometric Surface of the Death Valley Regional Groundwater Flow System, Nevada and California by Michael T

    U.S. Department of the Interior Prepared in cooperation with the Scientific Investigations Report 2016-5150 U.S. Geological Survey Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Sheet 1 (Interagency Agreement DE–AI52–01NV13944), and Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (Interagency Agreement DE–AI28–02RW12167), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Nye County, Nevada 650000 115° 117° 550000 116° 600000 118° 450000 500000 San Antonio Mts Monte Cristo Range Monitor Range Big Smokey Stone Valley Cabin Grant Range Valley Railroad 1600 Tonopah Valley Quinn Canyon Range Reveille Range 38° 38° Lincoln County Reveille Valley 4200000 4200000 Esmeralda County 1700 1500 1800 1500 Cactus Penoyer Valley Goldfield 00 00 16 Flat 16 (Sand Spring Worthington Range Hill Valley) Nye County 1600 Cactus Range Clayton Valley Stonewall Montezuma Range Flat Kawich Range Timpahute Range Hiko Range Kawich Fish Lake Valley 1700 1500 Gold Valley North Pahranagat Range 1600 Flat Palmetto Mts 1400 Stonewall 1400 4150000 4150000 1500 Mtn 1600 1500 East Pahranagat Range Pahranagat Range 1300 Magruder Mtn Tikaboo Valley Belted Range EmigrantValley Groom Range Last Chance Range 1500 Slate Ridge 1200 1300 Eureka Valley 1200 Pahute 1100 Black Mesa 1100 Mtn 1000 Gold Rainier Eleana 1500 Range Mtn Stonewall Mesa 1000 White Mts Pass Desert Range 900 Halfpint Range Shoshone Yucca 800 Grapevine Mts Flat 1300 Timber Mtn 1500 Sarcobatus Mtn 700 4100000 4100000 1700 Flat 37° 37° 1400 Desert 1600 Valley
  • Archaeological Curved Throwing Sticks from Fish Cave, Near Fallon, Nevada

    Archaeological Curved Throwing Sticks from Fish Cave, Near Fallon, Nevada

    UC Merced Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Title Archaeological Curved Throwing Sticks from Fish Cave, near Fallon, Nevada Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7133f1jb Journal Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 24(1) ISSN 0191-3557 Author Tuohy, Donald R. Publication Date 2002 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 13-20 (2004) 13 Archaeological Curved Throwing Sticks from Fish Gave, near Fallon, Nevada DONALD R. TUOHY Nevada State Museum, 600 North Carson Street, Carson City, NV 89701 While attending the 32"'' Annual Meeting of the Society for California Archaeologists, April 8-11, 1998, I became acquainted with Dr. Henry C. Koerper who gave a paper with two co-authors, Henry Pinkston and Michael Wilken, and the paper's title was "Nonreturn Boomerangs in Baja California Norte." I asked for a copy of that paper and one other (Koerper 1997) he had previously written, "A Game String and Rabbit Stick Cache from Borrego Valley, San Diego Country, (Koerper 1998: 252-270). I told him about two wooden "Rabbit Clubs" which had been found in Lovelock Cave, (Loud and Harrington 1929:Plate 16a and b) (Figure 1) and the nine so-called "rabbit clubs" found in Fish Cave near Fallon, Nevada by S.M. Wheeler and his wife Georgia [Wheeler S.M. and Wheeler G.N. 1969:68-70; see also Winslow (1996) and Winslow and Wedding (1997:140-150.)] I told Dr. Koerper that I would date four of the nine so-called "rabbit clubs" from Fish Cave by Accelerator Mass Spectrometry.
  • A. Geologic Section B. Hydrogeologic Section SECTIONS SHOWING

    A. Geologic Section B. Hydrogeologic Section SECTIONS SHOWING

    WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 96-4109 Prepared in cooperation with the Regional ground-water flow at and near the Nevada Test Site (sections)—PLATE 2 OF 4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Laczniak and others, 1996, Summary of hydrogeologic controls U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY on ground-water flow at the Nevada Test Site, Nye County, Nevada 116°22'30" A. Geologic Section A A' Rainier Mesa NEVADA CALIFORNIA FEET FEET Rock Valley 8,000 Rainier Mesa Ex.1 8,000 Eleana fault system Dolomite Hill Range Tongue Wash fault Yucca Flat French Peak Frenchman Flat Mercury Specter Range Amargosa Flat Amargosa Valley Funeral Mountains Death Valley Valley UE-2ce Yucca Carpetbag fault Yucca faultU-7a UE-6e Lake U-11f Water Well 5b Travertine Well Bat Mountain fault Tracer 2 Devils Hole Travertine Springs SEA LEVEL SEA LEVEL -5,000 -5,000 Major buried fault NO VERTICAL EXAGGERATION in this zone; see text B. Hydrogeologic Section A Ash Meadows ground-water subbasin Alkali Flat - Furnace Creek Ranch ground-water subbasin A' Rainier Mesa FEET Eleana FEET Range Rock Valley 8,000 Rainier Mesa Ex.1 8,000 Dolomite Hill Yucca fault system Funeral Mountains Yucca Flat Lake French Peak Frenchman Flat Specter Range Amargosa Flat Amargosa Valley Death Valley UE-2ce U-7a Ash UE-6e Amargosa River U-11f Meadows Water Well 5b Travertine Well Tracer 2 Devils Hole Travertine Springs SEA LEVEL SEA LEVEL -5,000 -5,000 NO VERTICAL EXAGGERATION MILES 5 0 5 1015 20 51020300 51525 KILOMETERS EXPLANATION Geologic / hydrogeologic units—Units are shown on geologic section and hydrogeologic section Contact—Dashed where uncertain or inferred.
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement

    Final Environmental Impact Statement

    Final Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada Readers Guide and Summary U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management DOE/EIS-0250 February 2002 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS To ensure a more reader-friendly document, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) limited the use of acronyms and abbreviations in this environmental impact statement. In addition, acronyms and abbreviations are defined the first time they are used in each chapter or appendix. The acronyms and abbreviations used in the text of this document are listed below. Acronyms and abbreviations used in tables and figures because of space limitations are listed in footnotes to the tables and figures. CFR Code of Federal Regulations DOE U.S. Department of Energy (also called the Department) EIS environmental impact statement EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FR Federal Register LCF latent cancer fatality MTHM metric tons of heavy metal NEPA National Environmental Policy Act, as amended NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NWPA Nuclear Waste Policy Act, as amended PM10 particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 micrometers or less PM2.5 particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less REMI Regional Economic Models, Inc. RMEI reasonably maximally exposed individual Stat. United States Statutes TSPA Total System Performance Assessment U.S.C. United States Code UNDERSTANDING SCIENTIFIC NOTATION DOE has used scientific notation in this EIS to express numbers that are so large or so small that they can be difficult to read or write.
  • Generalized Surficial Geologic Map of the Denver 1 X 2 Degree

    Generalized Surficial Geologic Map of the Denver 1 X 2 Degree

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY INTERPRETIVE GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTIONS FOR THE DEATH VALLEY REGIONAL FLOW SYSTEM AND SURROUNDING AREAS, NEVADA AND CALIFORNIA By Donald S. Sweetkind1, Robert P. Dickerson2, Richard J. Blakely3, and Paul D. Denning1 2001 Prepared in cooperation with OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION NEVADA OPERATIONS OFFICE, under Interagency Agreement DE-AI08-96NV11967 1U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, Colo. 2Pacific Western Technologies, Inc., Denver, Colo. 3U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif. Pamphlet to accompany MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES MAP MF–2370 CONTENTS Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 1 Stratigraphic overview .................................................................................................................... 3 Structural overview ........................................................................................................................ 6 Cross sections in the vicinity of the Nevada Test Site .................................................................... 8 Pre-Tertiary
  • Locally Intruded by Late Mesozoic (@93 M.Y.BP) Plutonic Rocks Related Ti the Sierra Nevada Batholith

    Locally Intruded by Late Mesozoic (@93 M.Y.BP) Plutonic Rocks Related Ti the Sierra Nevada Batholith

    —-...--...——.—— LA-10428-MS ! CIC-14REPORT COLLECTION C3* Reproduction COPY :,;-.+Z;LJJ I .—.— .n.Tm—. Los Alamos Nationel Laboratory IS operated by the Unlverslty 01 California for the Uruted States Department of Energy undercontiact W-7405 .ENG-36. ,- ~.. ., . ,.. -. ,. .. .— - “- , . .,, i. ,, . .. ,.- . ... ,<.- . ...-;; . .: : . .. ,.:-” ,,,.,, , -; ,. ,. ., , .,-,. .N, u , ,,“~ : “,,; ,’...... .,, .!. ,,,.. , ., . .., .. ... # ,,.. .. ,,. .. ,. .- . “. ,, ‘..,.,.Nevada Test Site Field Trip (iuidebook .-, ,. ,. ,., , ..,,..,,“ :. .,,4,,d. .,}.., , .. “:.,-. ! ————. 1984 .--.—.. -:----s ● H.-: - -r., -. .,% .~hd.? I ..-.— —. .. — . .— —.— —...——— LosAlamosNationalLaboratory LosAllallT10sLosAlamos,NewMexico87545 k AffiitiveActlosa/Equdt)p@UOity fh@oyS?S This work was supported by the US Department of Energy, Waste Management Program/Nevada Operations Ofiiee and Los Alamos Weapons Development Pro- gram/Test Operations. Edited by Glenda Ponder, ESSDivision DISCLAIMER Thisreport waspreparedas an accountof work sponsoredby an agencyof the LhdtedStatesCoverrrment. Neitherthe UnitedStates Governmentnor any agencythereof, nor any of their employees,makesany warranty,expressor irnpIied,or assumesany Iegatliabilityor responsibilityfor the accuracy,wmpletenesa, or usefutncasof any information,apparatus,product, or processdisclosed,or representsthat i!ausewould not infringeprivatelyownedrights. Reference hereinto any specificcommercialproduct, process,or serviceby trade name,trademark,manufacturer,or otherwise,doesnot newaaarilywnatitute or Irssplyits