<<

Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected]

Optical detection of submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO

Mike Gruntman Department of Astronautical Engineering University of Southern

Acta Astronautica, Future In-Space Operations (FISO) Seminar v. 105, 156-170, 2014 February 25, 2015 10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.08.022

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – 1/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected]

Orbital Detection of ... Debris in LEO

• orbital debris in LEO

• observational gap and limitations of current techniques

• LODE (Local Orbital Debris Environment) concept  photon-counting time-tagging imaging sensor  debris detection

• LODE example and performance characteristics  antic ipa te d annua l num ber of d eb ri s event s/d et ecti ons

• mission and CONOPS

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 2/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected] Orbital Debris in LEO

• range from tiny (10 m) to very Large debris: > 7–10 cm (3″–4″) l(10)large (10 m)  tracked and cataloged by U.S. SSN • pose threat to spacecraft  ~ 19,000  loss of spacecraft  active can avoid collisions  ddtidlfdegradation and loss of (in principle) by maneuvering capabilities (incl. mission ending)  Space Fence will improve tracking of subsystems and payloads capabilities

Small debris: < 5 cm (2″) U.S. National Space Policy, 2010  characterized statistically “increase understanding of the  cannot be avoided by maneuvers current and future debris environment”  1 mm – 10 cm: estimated >107  < 1mm: estimated >1012

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 3/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected]

< 0.1 mm Observational Gap • can be experimentally characterized by bringing exposed surfaces back to Earth from orbit (LDEF, SMM, EURECA, Space Shuttle) Models (()ORDEM and MASTER) disagree (order of magnitude) in > 5 cm the 0.1–10 mm range • tracked/cataloged by radar

Focus of this work: 0.1 – 10 mm submillimeter (0.1 – 1.0 mm) and millimeter (1 – 10 mm) debris • too small to be detected by radar or optically • too few to be measured by studying exposed surfaces  one hthas to rel y on mod dlieling

damage to spacecraft and payloads  ranges from surface degradation to loss of spacecraft or its components and payloads Figure: Krisko et al., IAC-14-A6.2.8, 2014

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 4/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected] Accumulation of Debris

ditfdbi>1density of debris > 1 mm atmospheric drag effectively removes debris below 600 km • 1-mm sphere at 400-km altitude reenters the atmosphere within a couple weeks

debris accumulate above 700 km • solar radiation pressure could decrease lifetime of large area- to-mass ratio debris • maximum density at ~ 800 km

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 5/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected]

RdRadar an dOtilLiittid Optical Limitations Radar limitations • radar detection ~R-4 NASA Haystack and Goldstone • radar cross section (RCS) • can detect debris down to several mm at RCS ≈ area (d2) for d > 3 altitudes of 400 km • RCS drops precipitously with decreasing Haystack and Haystack Auxiliary (HAX) size for d < (1/3) (Rayleigh scattering) • demonstrated detection up to 800 km • most radars operate in S band ( = 6–15 cm) and X band ( ≈ 3 cm) • atmospheric absorption fundamentally German TIRA radar limits increase of radar frequencies • detected 1–2 cm debris at altitudes up beyond X band to 1000 km

Optical observations • a number of feasibility studies for observing • ground- and space-based telescopes millimeter and (primarily) centimeter size primarily observe large GEO objects debris in LEO by space-based sensors • space-based optical sensors observe • all based on CCDs in focal plane large objects in LEO (e.g., MSX) • nobody looked at submillimeter debris

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 6/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected] Local Orbital Debris Environment (LODE) Sensor

Observation-validated models of Local Orbital Debris Environment (LODE) dbidebris env ironmen t essen tilftial for • to measure debris near orbit optimal design and safe operations of satellites • based on passive optical photon-counting time-tagging imaging system  models disagg(ree (0.1–10 mm) •a way tlto close thbthe observa tiltional gap  even if they were in agreement, important to validate

NASA Handbook 9719.4, 2008 This work: “From the safety and the satellite operations perspective, there is top-level an immediate need for a large feasibility and dedicated meteoroid and study orbital debris sensor to monitor (unfunded) and update the populations between 0. 1 and 10mm1.0 mm.” Acta Astronautica v. 105, 156-170, 2014

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 7/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected] LODE Concept

focal plane detector of a small telescope • photon-counting time-tagging imaging system (position-sensitive detector based on microchannel plates – PSD based on MCP) • essentially different from frame detectors (CCDs)

PSDs used since 1970s • laboratory and space MG: • open type (electrons, ions, EUV, X-rays) and review sealed with photocathode (optical) article in major • numerous space instruments (plasma and physics energgpetic particle anal y;yzers; EUV and X-ray journal spectrometers and imagers) in 1984 • optical: ground-based telescopes (very few) • optical: currently operational in two instruments (COS an d STIS) on Hu bble S pace T el escope

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 8/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected] Position-Sensitive Detector (PSD) based on MCP

Siegmund et al., • incident particle (photon) converted into an SPIE-8033, 2001 avalh(lanche (106–108)fl) of elec trons • different types of readout schemes • determine: coordinates (x,y) and detection time (t) of each registered photon in real time • image built up (accumulated) in computer memory

• sensitive area: 20×20 mm to 100×100 mm • spatial resolution: up to 2000×2000 pixels • time (tagging) resolution: ~1 ns • max count rate (total): up to 106 s–1 • max count rate (point source): 10–100 s–1

PSDs essentially differ from frame detectors (CCDs)

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 9/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected] Detection of Debris Crossing FOV

Prior studies of optical space-based LODE debris detection sensors fdbidttifor debris detection • debris passage across FOV forms • CCD in focal plane “3D debris trajectory” in (the focal • debris passage across FOV during a plane plus time) – (x,y,t) 3D space frame accumulation time interval results • requires detection of only several in a streak across a pattern of fixed photons to extract the rare event stars and diffuse background disadvantage: smaller photon detection •forms “2D debris trajectory” in focal efficiency than by CCDs plane – (x,y) 2D space • significantly smaller (than for CCD- • 20 or more photons are needed for based frame detector) number of signal above noise in a single CCD pixel debris-reflected photons should • reliable detection of a rare streak enter the sensor  higher sensitivity requires multiple lightened-up pixels  opens a way for detecting smaller • at least a few hundred debris- (submillimeter) debris reflected photons should enter the • MCP-based PSDs have been never sensor considered for detection of small debris

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 10/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected]

Siegmund et al., DtDetec tion o fDbif Debris SPIE-8033, 2001

• bright stars: Phot o- must be avoided (small fraction of the sky) cathode (S-20) • PSD intrinsic noise: significantly smaller efficiency  than diffuse background count rate

• sensor geometitric f act or ( 0×0)li) lim itdbited by sky light background

sensor sppgectral range assume ((psimplified ) • visible: 400–850 nm • antisolar pointing light background (e.g., sun-synchronous dawn-dusk orbit) • Zodiacal light • velocity of debris V0 = 10 km/sec normalifthFOVl crossing of the sensor FOV • integrated starlight of unresolved stars • isotropic (2) scattering of solar light by • diffuse galactic light debris with albedo  = 0.15 • typical background intensity: • M debris-scattered photons to be 2 500 S10S ≈ 21 mag/arcsec ≈ 8.0 kR registered for debris event detection

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 11/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected]

DtDetec tion o fDbif Debris Maximum distance hM for debris (size a) FOV crossing detection

Effective debris

detection area S(a) 0

a – debris diameter

V0 – debris velocity  – debris albedo

d0 – sensor aperture diameter  – photon detection efficiency

CM – maximum count rate

f0 – sky diffuse background A passage of an object larger in size and/or FS – solar photon flux closer to the sensor would result in a M – number of debris-scattered larger average number of registered photons photons and consequent event detection

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 12/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected]

LODE E xampl e d0 = 6 cm (sensor aperture diameter) 4 –1 CM = 10 s (maximum count rate)

–6 0 = 5.35×10 sr (solid angle)

0 = 0.15º (plane angle) M minimal number of debris-reflected photons to be registered fOfor FOV crossing by a debris) mV = 7.6 and brighter to be avoided

necessary to determine 25,000 stars a probability that random background 1.1% of the sky photons produce a pattern of registered photons indistinguishable form a true debris detection PSD (in the focal plane) 15–25 mm (diameter) 128×128 pixels (resolution)

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 13/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected]

Mini mal N umb er of R egi st ered Ph ot ons M

example: it takes t= 1 ms for a debris to cross the selected FOV at the h = 3.8 km distance

One would consider photons registered (accumulated) during such a time interval of (t = 1 ms) for search of events of debris passage at this distance (h) or closer t, ms

1 false event per year

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 14/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected]

Maximum Distance and Detection Area

actually, effective maximum detection distance and effective detection areas are largg(er (a factor of ~2 for area) because of the Poissonian nature of detected photons 1 false event per year size 0.15 mm 0.3 mm 1.0 mm 3.0 mm 10 mm M 4 4 5 6 7

hM 15.6 m 62 m 0.55 km 4.2 km 40 km t 0.004 ms 0.016 ms 0.14 ms 1.1 ms 10 ms S032mS 0.32 m2 51m5.1 m2 400 m2 0. 023 km2 20km2.0 km2

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 15/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected]

1 mm at 0. 55 km 3mmat42km3 mm at 4.2 km 10 mm at 40 km LODE FOV Crossing by Debris

blue dots bkbackground photons

red dots debris reflected

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 16/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected]

Orbit AlNbfDbiEtAnnual Number of Debris Events altitude 800 km flux density detection rate –1 ilitiinclination per 0. 1-mm bin , m2 yr –1 per 0. 1-mm bin , yr 98.5º

MASTER predicts fewer debris than ORDEM

total annual number (0.2 – 10.0 mm) – 1400 3.8 events per day submillimeter (0.2 – 1.0 mm) – 780 2.1 events per day (large) millimeter ( 6 – 10 mm) – 465 1.3 events per day

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 17/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected]

Missi on and CONOPS

Instrument/experiment challenges Spacecraft and mission • detection of smallest debris closest to • small satellite or hosted payload the instrument • no major challenges to • capture of a burst of 10–15 photons spacecraft or CONOPS within 1 microsecond  exception: high-data rate  deadtime < 50 ns • raising the minimal debris size to Narrow-FOV LODE concept is 0.3 mm (()from 0.2 mm) will substantiall y complementary to radar (Haystack and relax the requirements to the detector HAX) and wide-FOV CCD-based optical instruments  constrain uncertainties of • data rate 1 Mbps ≈ 1011 bit/day (raw) measurements byyq various techniques  challenging for a small sat could be used for measuring debris in • real-time processing on board GEO, GTO, and dust in lunar environment • straightforward for short time intervals micrometeoroid fluxes (lldbi)(smallest debris) Thank you for your attention!

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 18/19 Submillimeter and millimeter debris in LEO Mike Gruntman [email protected]

About the Author

Mike Gruntman is Professor of Astronautics at the University of Southern California (USC); he is the founder of the USC Astronautics Program and served the founding chairman of the Department of Astronautical Engineering from 2004–2007. His research interests include astronautics, space physics and instrumentation, rocketry and propulsion, and satellite design and technologies. He is Co-I on current NASA missions IBEX and TWINS. Mike authored and co -authored 270 publications , including 85+ journal articles and book chapters and 3 books. He served on the editorial board of the journal Review of Scientific Instruments and on various government advisory panels. Mike teaches courses in spacecraft design (1100 graduate students during the lt10last 10 years ) an d spacecra ft propu liHlsion. He a lso teac hes s hthort courses (AIAA, ATI) to industry and government. Web site: astronauticsnow.com email: [email protected]

FISO Series – February 25, 2015 USC/VSOE – Astronautics 19/19