Volume 19, Number 4 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Volume 19, Number 4 2012 Volume 19, Number 4 OUEST 2012 THE HISTORY OF SPACEFLIGHT QUARTERLY www.spacehistory101.com Boeing’s Proposed LEM, 1962 THE THREE HEROES OF TELSTAR: MONITORING THE EARTH SPACEFLIGHT: BOEING’S FROM SPACE: THE FIRST COMMUNICATIONS ROPOSED THE RISE OF THE TSIOLKOVSKII – P LEM SATELLITE AN INTERVIEW WITH GODDARD – OBERTH INTERPRETATION JOHN MACDONALD AND ITS CURRENT VALIDITY IN MEMORIAM: ARMSTRONG, RIDE, MCCARTNEY Contents Volume 19 • Number 4 2012 www.spacehistory101.com 4 The Three Heroes of Spaceflight: Book Reviews The Rise of the Tsiolkovskii - Goddard - Oberth Interpretation and Its Current Validity 53 The Final Journey of the Saturn V By Michael J. Neufeld Book by Andrew Thomas & Paul Thomarios Review by Hunter Hollins 14 Boeing’s Proposed LEM By Paul Carsola 54 The Cosmonaut Who Couldn’t Stop Smiling: The Life and Legend of Yuri Gagarin 22 Telstar: The First Communications Satellite Book by Andrew L. Jenks 50 Years Since Its Launch (10 July 1962) Review by Roshanna P. Sylvester By David Whalen 56 U.S. Presidents and the Militarization 45 Monitoring the Earth from Space: of Space (1946-1967) An Oral History with Dr. John S. MacDonald Book by Sean N. Kalic By Barry Shanko Review by Rick W. Sturdevant 64 In Memoriam: Armstrong, Ride, McCartney 57 50 Years of Rockets and Spacecraft / NASA Marshall Space Flight Center By David Christopher Arnold Book by Ed Buckbee Review by Michael J. Neufeld Front Cover Credit: Boeing artist Jack Olson’s 1962 painting of Boeing’s proposed LEM. Credit: Boeing 58 Imagining Outer Space: European Astroculture in the Twentieth Century Book by Alexander G. T. Geppert Review by Janet Vertesi 59 Architecture for Astronauts: An Activity-Based Approach Book by Sandra Häuplik-Meusburger Review by Roger D. Launius 60 Atmospheric Science at NASA: A History Book by Erik M. Conway Review by Roger D. Launius 61 The Spacesuit Film: A History (1918-1969) Book by Gary Westfahl Review by Cathleen S. Lewis 62 The Economic Laws of Scientific Research Book by Terence Kealey Review by Roger D. Launius Fifty years ago, in 1962, employees at JPL gathered by the Mariner Venus probe. Image courtesy of Art LeBrun THE THREE HEROES OF SPACEFLIGHT: THE RISE OF THE TSIOLKOVSKII - GODDARD - OBERTH INTERPRETATION AND ITS CURRENT VALIDITY By Michael J. Neufeld impact on rocket technology and the The majority pattern was the mul- public imagination.2 This new litera- tiple independent discovery of the same ture provides the basis for the reexami- set of ideas, or at least parts of them, The single most enduring inter- nation of the validity of the “three between about 1908 and 1918, a quite pretation in space history credits three heroes” scheme that Clary calls for, and common occurrence in the history of thinkers with independently proving the not just an examination of its origins. It science and technology.3 For example, scientific and technological feasibility is my conclusion that, based on the the- after several years of racking his brains, of spaceflight in the late 19th and early oretical originality of Tsiolkovskii, the American physics student Robert 20th centuries: Konstantin Tsiolkovskii Goddard, and Oberth, and their role in Goddard realized the rocket was the in Russia and the USSR, Hermann sparking the formation of space soci- answer in early 1909, a year or so after Oberth in German-speaking central eties and stimulating other theorists to French aviation pioneer Robert Europe, and Robert Goddard in the publish, the traditional interpretation Esnault-Pelterie, and a year or so before United States. Precursors and contem- still is defensible, but at the cost of iron- the Transylvanian-German high-school poraries, such as Hermann Ganswindt ing out many complexities, such as the student Hermann Oberth. But despite and Robert Esnault-Pelterie, are usually intellectual foundations of the various early articles by Tsiolkovskii (1903 and assigned to a distinctly second rank. In space movements, and the contributions 1911-13) and Esnault-Pelterie (1913), a recent years, the historian of Soviet of other theorists like Robert Esnault- Belgian patent on advanced rocket spaceflight, Asif Siddiqi, has labeled Pelterie, Walter Hohmann, Yurii ideas issued to the French physician this scheme a “cliché” and the Goddard Kondratiuk, and Fridrikh Tsander. André Bing (1911), and an extremely biographer David Clary has called the obscure and flawed book by a French interpretation a 1960s invention that The Origins of the Interpretation utopian socialist, Victor Coissac “bears reexamination.”1 Before an international space- (1916), all of the pioneers operated in While the Tsiolkovskii-Goddard- flight movement emerged between isolation, and several were convinced Oberth (TGO) interpretation had its 1924 and 1933, there was a period of that they were the first in the world to origins in priority claims inside the several decades in which isolated ama- think of these ideas. Goddard, for one, international space advocacy move- teur and professional scientists, engi- was obsessed with his supposed priori- ment between the 1920s and 1950s, this neers, and inventors tried to imagine ty for the rest of his life. The few publi- paper traces its full-blown emergence, how to create a feasible technology to cations there were languished in obscu- at least in the English-language litera- solve the apparently utopian problem of rity, except in Russia, where the famous ture, to the post-1957 “space race.” travel to other celestial bodies. I cannot science journalist Iakov Perel’man pub- After the launch of Sputnik, the USSR re-tell that complicated story here, lished a book based on Tsiolkovskii’s trumpeted Tsiolkovskii’s founding role although I will later discuss some of the work, Mezhplanetnoe puteshestvie even more loudly than it had earlier, the priorities of the various writers and (“Inter- planetary Travel”) in 1915, the United States adopted Goddard as its thinkers that shed light on whether the world’s first popular, non-fiction dis- neglected hero, and the former TGO interpretation is still defensible. cussion of realistic spaceflight tech- Germans in the United States (notably Suffice it to say that the clear pattern is nologies. But a combination of the lin- Willy Ley and Wernher von Braun) tes- that there are two outliers who began as guistic barrier between Russia and the tified as to Oberth’s influence. The early as the 1880s to grasp the central west, the war, and the Revolution and interpretation hardened into a set pat- insight, that a greatly improved rocket Civil War, meant that this work was tern visible in most histories of space- was the key to space travel (an idea unknown outside Russia and soon flight written by advocates and journal- much more obvious in hindsight than it mostly forgotten within it. ists, especially those in English. was at the time). Both of them were The first work that made an inter- In recent years, new scholarship marginal eccentrics—a near-deaf national impact was Goddard’s A has made the historical context for the schoolteacher in Kaluga, Russia, Method of Reaching Extreme Altitudes, early theorists and enthusiasts much Konstantin Tsiolkovskii, and a cranky which the Smithsonian Institution pub- richer, notably works by Siddiqi and inventor in Berlin, Germany, Hermann lished in early January 1920 with a James Andrews on Tsiolkovskii and the Ganswindt. But only the former went 1919 date on it. Frank Winter has early Russian/Soviet spaceflight move- on to develop a scientifically sound recently demonstrated that Goddard’s ment, and by Clary, J. D. Hunley, and body of theoretical work demonstrating proposal to hit the Moon with a rocket Frank H. Winter on Goddard and his space travel’s feasibility. carrying flash power accidentally pro- Q U E S T 19:4 2012 4 www.spacehistory101.com duced not just a newspaper flap in the topic in 1928 that rates (in typically or half-baked ideas. Only in the later United States, but also a worldwide nationalist fashion) Ganswindt as a volumes does he clearly assign credit. echo of media publicity, one that funda- misunderstood genius. He then devotes He devotes all of volume 7 to mentally reshaped science fiction and several pages each to Goddard, Oberth, Tsiolkovskii (including the reprint of the popular understanding of space- and the Austrian theoretician Franz many of his works), and volume 8 to (in flight.4 Wild rumors that Goddard Edler von Hoefft (in hindsight a minor this order): Esnault-Pelterie, Goddard, would soon launch himself to the Moon figure and even a quasi-fraud), but he Oberth, Hohmann, the German space- circulated around the globe in the never mentions any Russians. Willy flight skeptic Hans Lorenz, and then a 1920s, notably in central Europe and Ley’s small chronology of the history dozen others more briefly. Earlier in the Soviet Russia. The effect was such that of the rocket in November 1932 does series, in volume 4, Rynin makes clear the Austrian rocket experimenter Max discuss Tsiolkovskii, but not until 1924, that his fundamental list was five, not Valier wrote in 1930 that “even today the date of republication in the USSR of three, that is, including Esnault-Pelterie the broad mass of the public often mis- the Russian theorist’s earlier work, and and Hohmann.8 takenly believes that [Goddard] was the does not mention Esnault-Pelterie until Another key Soviet space popu- first originator of the modern space- he reaches 1927. The latter, in his com- larizer was Iakov Perel’man. Asif flight idea.”5 prehensive work L’Astronautique (he Siddiqi,
Recommended publications
  • History of Rocket Technology
    CHAPTER 1 History of Rockets 1. 1. INTRODUCTION Action-Reaction Principle Take any technology and you always find that its practical demonstration had been realized much before the theory was established. However, you may note that the fast and effective refinement of a technology begins only after its theory, explaining the underlying basic principles, has been established. The action-reaction principle that is fundamental to jet propulsion, which includes airbreathing- as well as rocket-propulsion, was theoretically explained only in 1687 by the English scientist Sir Isaac Newton by his famous publication “Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (“Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy”). But, approximately 2100 years before this, Archytas, a Greek philosopher, mathematician, astronomer, statesman, and strategist, had demonstrated the action-reaction principle by his toy pigeon in the city of Tarentum, Fig. 1. 1. Archytas suspended on a wire his wooden pigeon that contained hot steam at an elevated pressure in its belly cavity. The other end of the wire was hooked on to the top of a tall pole. On releasing a plug, a jet of steam escaped through a hole from the rear of the pigeon to produce a thrust that made the toy pigeon fly in circles around the pole. Thus Archytas mystified and amused the citizens of Tarentum by his flying toy- pigeon and demonstrated the fundamental principle of propulsion: “every force has an equal and opposite reaction”. The second recorded-demonstration of the action-reaction principle was in the first century B.C. Hero of Alexandria, a Greek mathematician 1 and scientist, constructed a device known as aeolipile.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Book Update
    15th Annual International Astrophysics Conference Cape Coral, FL – April 3-8, 2016 AGENDA SUNDAY, APRIL 3 5:00 PM – 8:00 PM Registration – Tarpon Terrace 6:00 PM – 9:00 PM Welcome Reception - Tarpon Terrace MONDAY, APRIL 4 7:00 AM - 5:00 PM Registration – Grandville Ballroom 8:00 AM – 6:00 PM GENERAL SESSION – Grandville Ballroom CHAIR: Zank 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM GARY ZANK WELCOME 8:00 AM - 8:25 AM Chen, Bin Particle Acceleration by a Solar Flare Termination Shock 8:25 AM - 8:50 AM Bucik, Radoslav Large-scale Coronal Waves in 3He-rich Solar Energetic Particle Events Element Abundances and Source Plasma Temperatures of 8:50 AM - 9:15 AM Reames, Donald Solar Energetic Particles 9:15 AM - 9:40 AM Manchester, Ward Simulating CME-Driven Shocks and Implications for SEPs STEREO and ACE SEP Science- Transforming Space Weather 9:40 AM - 10:05 AM Luhmann, Janet Prospects 10:05 AM - 10:30 AM Morning Break - Ballroom Foyer CHAIR: Zirnstein 11 years of ENA imaging with Cassini/INCA and in-situ ion Voyager1 & 10:30 AM - 10:55 AM Krimigis, Stamatios 2/LECP measurements Investigating the Heliospheric Boundary at Energies down to 10eV with 10:55 AM - 11:20 AM Wurz, Peter Neutral Atom Imaging by IBEX. In-situ and Remote Sensing Studies of Solar Wind Origin and 11:20 AM - 11:45 AM Landi, Enrico Acceleration The Sun’s Dynamic Influence on the Outer Heliosphere, the Heliosheath, 11:45 AM - 12:10 PM Intriligator, Devrie and the Local Interstellar Medium 12:10 PM – 1:30 PM Lunch Break – Ballroom Foyer CHAIR: Fichtner 1:30 PM - 1:55 PM McNutt, Ralph Making Interstellar
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space
    SALYUT: Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space December 1983 NTIS order #PB84-181437 Recommended Citation: SALYUT: Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space–A Technical Mere- orandum (Washington, D. C.: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, OTA- TM-STI-14, December 1983). Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 83-600624 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Foreword As the other major spacefaring nation, the Soviet Union is a subject of interest to the American people and Congress in their deliberations concerning the future of U.S. space activities. In the course of an assessment of Civilian Space Stations, the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) has undertaken a study of the presence of Soviets in space and their Salyut space stations, in order to provide Congress with an informed view of Soviet capabilities and intentions. The major element in this technical memorandum was a workshop held at OTA in December 1982: it was the first occasion when a significant number of experts in this area of Soviet space activities had met for extended unclassified discussion. As a result of the workshop, OTA prepared this technical memorandum, “Salyut: Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space. ” It has been reviewed extensively by workshop participants and others familiar with Soviet space activities. Also in December 1982, OTA wrote to the U. S. S. R.’s Ambassador to the United States Anatoliy Dobrynin, requesting any information concerning present and future Soviet space activities that the Soviet Union judged could be of value to the OTA assess- ment of civilian space stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Exploration Roadmap
    The Global Exploration Roadmap January 2018 What is New in The Global Exploration Roadmap? This new edition of the Global Exploration robotic space exploration. Refinements in important role in sustainable human space Roadmap reaffirms the interest of 14 space this edition include: exploration. Initially, it supports human and agencies to expand human presence into the robotic lunar exploration in a manner which Solar System, with the surface of Mars as • A summary of the benefits stemming from creates opportunities for multiple sectors to a common driving goal. It reflects a coordi- space exploration. Numerous benefits will advance key goals. nated international effort to prepare for space come from this exciting endeavour. It is • The recognition of the growing private exploration missions beginning with the Inter- important that mission objectives reflect this sector interest in space exploration. national Space Station (ISS) and continuing priority when planning exploration missions. Interest from the private sector is already to the lunar vicinity, the lunar surface, then • The important role of science and knowl- transforming the future of low Earth orbit, on to Mars. The expanded group of agencies edge gain. Open interaction with the creating new opportunities as space agen- demonstrates the growing interest in space international science community helped cies look to expand human presence into exploration and the importance of coopera- identify specific scientific opportunities the Solar System. Growing capability and tion to realise individual and common goals created by the presence of humans and interest from the private sector indicate and objectives. their infrastructure as they explore the Solar a future for collaboration not only among System.
    [Show full text]
  • PEENEMUENDE, NATIONAL SOCIALISM, and the V-2 MISSILE, 1924-1945 Michael
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: ENGINEERING CONSENT: PEENEMUENDE, NATIONAL SOCIALISM, AND THE V-2 MISSILE, 1924-1945 Michael Brian Petersen, Doctor of Philosophy, 2005 Dissertation Directed By: Professor Jeffrey Herf Departmen t of History This dissertation is the story of the German scientists and engineers who developed, tested, and produced the V-2 missile, the world’s first liquid -fueled ballistic missile. It examines the social, political, and cultural roots of the prog ram in the Weimar Republic, the professional world of the Peenemünde missile base, and the results of the specialists’ decision to use concentration camp slave labor to produce the missile. Previous studies of this subject have been the domain of either of sensationalistic journalists or the unabashed admirers of the German missile pioneers. Only rarely have historians ventured into this area of inquiry, fruitfully examining the history of the German missile program from the top down while noting its admi nistrative battles and technical development. However, this work has been done at the expense of a detailed examination of the mid and lower -level employees who formed the backbone of the research and production effort. This work addresses that shortcomi ng by investigating the daily lives of these employees and the social, cultural, and political environment in which they existed. It focuses on the key questions of dedication, motivation, and criminality in the Nazi regime by asking “How did Nazi authori ties in charge of the missile program enlist the support of their employees in their effort?” “How did their work translate into political consent for the regime?” “How did these employees come to view slave labor as a viable option for completing their work?” This study is informed by traditions in European intellectual and social history while borrowing from different methods of sociology and anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Relations with Alien Intelligences – the Scientific Basis of Metalaw1
    Appendix Relations with Alien Intelligences – The Scientific Basis of Metalaw1 Ernst Fasan DK 340.114:341.229:2:133 1 The appendix was previously published by Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz in 1970. © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 181 P.M. Sterns, L.I. Tennen (eds.), Private Law, Public Law, Metalaw and Public Policy in Space, Space Regulations Library 8, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-27087-6 Contents Foreword by Wernher von Braun ����������������������������������������������������������������� 185 Introduction ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 187 I: The Possibility of Encountering Nonhuman Intelligent Beings �������������� 189 Opinions in Ancient Literature ��������������������������������������������������������������������� 189 The Results of Modern Science �������������������������������������������������������������� 191 II: The Physical Nature of Extraterrestrial Beings �������������������������������������� 205 The Necessary Characteristics ��������������������������������������������������������������������� 205 Origin and Development of Protoplasmic Life ��������������������������������������� 209 Intelligent Machines – The Question of Robots �������������������������������������� 210 III: The Concept, Term, and Literature of Metalaw ����������������������������������� 213 Selection and Definition of the Term ����������������������������������������������������������� 213 A Survey of Literature �����������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Studies Towards an Australian Indigenous Space Launch System
    TRADE STUDIES TOWARDS AN AUSTRALIAN INDIGENOUS SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Engineering by Gordon P. Briggs B.Sc. (Hons), M.Sc. (Astron) School of Engineering and Information Technology, University College, University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy January 2010 Abstract During the project Apollo moon landings of the mid 1970s the United States of America was the pre-eminent space faring nation followed closely by only the USSR. Since that time many other nations have realised the potential of spaceflight not only for immediate financial gain in areas such as communications and earth observation but also in the strategic areas of scientific discovery, industrial development and national prestige. Australia on the other hand has resolutely refused to participate by instituting its own space program. Successive Australian governments have preferred to obtain any required space hardware or services by purchasing off-the-shelf from foreign suppliers. This policy or attitude is a matter of frustration to those sections of the Australian technical community who believe that the nation should be participating in space technology. In particular the provision of an indigenous launch vehicle that would guarantee the nation independent access to the space frontier. It would therefore appear that any launch vehicle development in Australia will be left to non- government organisations to at least define the requirements for such a vehicle and to initiate development of long-lead items for such a project. It is therefore the aim of this thesis to attempt to define some of the requirements for a nascent Australian indigenous launch vehicle system.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Earth to Outer Space
    From the Earth to Outer Space Many years ago, people here on Earth decided that they wanted to go into outer space. This is something people had imagined for a very long time, in books and movies and stories grandparents told to their grandchildren. However, in the 1950s, people decided they really wanted to do it. There was just one problem: how would they get there? One of the earliest movies about flying to the moon was made by Georges Méliès and released in 1902. It was called A Trip to the Moon. In this movie, the moon was made up of a man’s face, covered in cream, and a whole tribe of angry natives lived there. That part was not very realistic. However, the spaceship didn’t seem too far-fetched: it was a small capsule, shaped like a bullet, that the astronauts loaded into a giant cannon and aimed at the moon. This movie was based on a book that came out many years earlier by an author named Jules Verne. One of the fans of the book was a Russian man, Konstantin Tsiolkovsky. The book made him think. Could you really shoot people out of a cannon and have them get safely to the moon? He decided you couldn’t, but it got him thinking of other ways you could get people to the moon. He spent his life considering this problem and came up with many solutions. © 2013 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved. Some of Tsiolkovsky’s solutions gave scientists in America and Russia (where Tsiolkovsky lived) ideas when they began to think about space travel.
    [Show full text]
  • Past, Present, and Future
    Rockets: Past, Present, and Future Robert Goddard With his Original Rocket system Delta IV … biggest commercial Rocket system currently in US arsenal Material from Rockets into Space by Frank H. Winter, ISBN 0-674-77660-7 MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Earliest Rockets as weapons • Chinese development, Sung dynasty (A.D. 960-1279) – Primarily psychological • William Congreve, England, 1804 – thus “the rockets red glare” during the war of 1812. – 1.5 mile range, very poor accuracy. • V2 in WWII MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems First Principle of Rocket Flight • “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” Isaac Newton, 1687, following Archytas of Tarentum, 360 BC, and Hero of Alexandria, circa 50 AD. • “Rockets move because the flame pushes against the surrounding air.” Edme Mariotte, 1717 • Which one is correct? MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Isaac Newton explains how to launch a Satellite MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems The Reaction-propelled Spaceship of Hermann Ganswindt (1890) • The fuel for his spaceship consisted of heavy steel cartridges with dynamite charges. They were to be fed machine gun style into a reaction chamber where they would fire and be dropped away. • “Shock absorbers protected the travelers” MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems The Three Amigos of Spaceflight Theory • Konstantin Tsiolkovsky • Hermann Oberth • Robert Goddard • Independent and parallel development of Rocket theory MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Three Amigos • Goddard • Oberth • Tsiolkovsky MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Konstantin Tsiolkovsky 1857 - 1935 • Deaf Russian School Teacher - fascinated with space flight, started by writing Science Fiction Novels • Discovered that practical space flight depended on liquid fuel rockets in the 1890’s, and developed the fundamental Rocket equation in 1897.
    [Show full text]
  • Mike Gruntman
    MIKE GRUNTMAN email: [email protected] tel. 213-740-5536 web site: astronauticsnow.com Biography: Dr. Mike Gruntman is professor and chair of astronautics at the University of Southern California (USC). His life journey took him from a child growing on the Tyuratam (Baikonur) missile and space launch base during the late 1950s and early 1960s to an accomplished space physicist and engineer to joining USC in 1990 and founding a major educational program in space engineering. Today it is a nationally recognized unique astronautical engineering department at USC. Mike is actively involved in R&D programs in space science and space technology. He served as a co-investigator (Co-I) on NASA missions and is a recipient of three NASA Group Achievement Awards. Mike has authored and co-authored 300 scholarly publications, including four books. His “Blazing the Trail: The Early History of Spacecraft and Rocketry” (AIAA, 2004) won the International Academy of Astronautics’ book award. More than two thousand graduate students took Dr. Gruntman’s courses in space systems and rocket propulsion at USC. He also teaches short courses (AIAA and ATI) for government and industry. Mike is an Associate Fellow of AIAA and Member (Academician) of the International Academy of Astronautics. Abstract: “The Road to Space. The First Thousand Years” This 70-80 min lecture presents the fascinating history of early rocketry and subsequent developments that led to the space age. It introduces visionaries, scientists, engineers, and political and military leaders from various lands who contributed to this endeavor. The development of rocketry and spaceflight is traced from ancient times through many centuries to the breakthrough to space.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Einstein and Wernher Von Braun – the Two Great German-American
    Albert Einstein and Wernher von Braun – the two great German-American Physicists seen in a Historical Perspective FRIEDWARDT WINTERBERG, University of Nevada Reno. Abstract It was Albert Einstein who changed our view of the universe to be a non-Euclidean curved space-time. And it was Wernher von Braun who showed how to make the first step to take us into this universe, leaving the gravitational field of our planet earth, with the landing a man on the moon the greatest event in human history. Both these great physicists did this on the shoulders of giants. Albert Einstein on the shoulders of his German landsman Bernhard Riemann, and Wernher von Braun on the shoulders of Goddard and Oberth. Both Einstein and von Braun made a Faustian pact with the devil, von Braun by accepting research funds from Hitler, and Einstein by urging Roosevelt to build the atom bomb (against Hitler). Both of these great men later regretted the use of their work for the killing of innocent bystanders, even though in the end the invention of nuclear energy and space flight is for the benefit of man. Their example serves as a warning for all of us. It can be formulated as follows: “Can I in good conscience accept research funds from the military to advance scientific knowledge, for weapons developed against an abstract enemy I never have met in person?" Weapons if used do not differentiate between the scientist, who invented these weapons, and the non-scientist. In this short essay I will show that there are many surprising parallels in the life of Albert Einstein and Wernher von Braun, the two great German-American physicists who had a decisive influence on the history of the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Now in English! Hermann Oberth: “The Rocket Into Planetary Space”
    Now in English! Formats: HardcoverBook eBook (PDF) eBook (EPUB) Print/eBook Hermann Oberth: “The Rocket into Planetary Space” “Under certain economic conditions, the construction of such machines may even become profitable. Such conditions might arise within a few decades. In the present document I intend to prove this statement.” (“Die Rakete zu den Planetenräumen”, Hermann Oberth 1923). With this revolutionary statement, physicist Hermann Oberth proved to be one of the most visionary and ingenious pioneers of rocketry. Fundamental and scientifically solid, his ideas were not only comprehensive, but he also conducted meticulous investigations about all possible rocket parameters. His proposals included spacecraft instrumentation for scientific missions, and novel ideas for launch and test facilities. Oberth did not limit himself to robotic rockets, but also looked closely at the various technical, physiological, and psychological problems and challenges that would be encountered with sending humans into space. Fundamental and scientific-technically solid were not only his comprehensive, meticulous investigations and optimization trade-offs of all possible rocket parameters, but also his proposals for spacecraft- instrumentation for manned and scientific missions as well as his novel ideas for launch- and test facilities. Oberth’s “Outlook” (§17) provides a prophetic “blue-print” of the many space applications which followed in the years to come and culminated in the implementation of today’s permanent manned space station which followed Hermann Oberth’s conceptual descriptions very closely. The book, thoroughly and expertly translated and now first published in English allows also all non- German readers to go back to the beginning, appreciate the problems associated with space travel and understand the never ending quest for space exploration.
    [Show full text]