Atmospheric Sounding by TAMDAR Over Keflavík Airport, Iceland – Comparison with Traditional Atmospheric Sounding Methods

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Atmospheric Sounding by TAMDAR Over Keflavík Airport, Iceland – Comparison with Traditional Atmospheric Sounding Methods Atmospheric Sounding by TAMDAR over Keflavík Airport, Iceland – Comparison with Traditional Atmospheric Sounding Methods Arnór Tumi Jóhannsson Skýrsla VÍ 2017-002 Atmospheric Sounding by TAMDAR over Keflavík Airport, Iceland – Comparison with Traditional Atmospheric Sounding Methods Arnór Tumi Jóhannsson, Veðurstofa Íslands Skýrsla Veðurstofa Íslands +354 522 60 00 VÍ 2017-002 Bústaðavegur 7–9 [email protected] ISSN 1670-8261 150 Reykjavík 4 Abstract Tropospheric measurements by radiosonde and Tropospheric Airborne Meteorological Data Re- porting (TAMDAR) over Keflavík a irport, I celand, w ere c ompared i n a n e ffort t o a ssess the potential benefit o f i mplementing T AMDAR d ata i n t he o bservations a nd f orecasting system of the Icelandic Meteorological Office ( IMO). D espite a r elatively s mall d ataset a nd consid- erable spatial variability in the data, it was concluded that TAMDAR performs well in mea- suring temperature. Temperature measurements of radiosonde and TAMDAR were generally in good agreement. Furthermore, the results suggest that TAMDAR does well at assessing wind direction. TAMDAR detects variations in relative humidity and is generally in accordance with relative humidity forecasts. The quality of TAMDAR wind speed measurements is difficult to determine, however discrepancies between wind speed measured by radiosonde and TAMDAR can usually be explained to some degree by forecast or observed spatial variability in wind. It is concluded that implementing TAMDAR data into the observations and forecasting system of the IMO would nicely supplement traditional atmospheric soundings to increase the coverage and frequency of atmospheric measurements in Icelandic airspace. Útdráttur Háloftamælingar með veðurkanna (e. radiosonde) voru bornar saman við háloftamælingar fram- kvæmdar af TAMDAR yfir Keflavíkurflugvelli. Tilgangur verkefnisins var að meta mögulegan ávinning þess að innleiða TAMDAR-gögn í athugunar- og spákerfi V eðurstofu Í slands. Þrátt fyrir fremur lítið gagnasafn og mikinn breytileika í rúmi var ályktað sem svo, að hitamælingar TAMDAR væru áreiðanlegar og í góðu samræmi við hitamælingar veðurkanna. Niðurstöður verkefnisins benda til þess að vindáttarmælingar TAMDAR séu almennt góðar. TAMDAR nemur breytingar í loftraka og eru loftrakamælingar í samræmi við spár að allnokkru leyti. Gæði vind- hraðamælinga TAMDAR eru torræð, en yfirleitt má skýra ósamræmi milli vindhraðamælinga veðurkanna og TAMDAR með þeim breytileika sem fram kemur í spám eða athugunum. Inn- leiðing TAMDAR-gagna yrði líkast til ágætisviðbót við þau gögn sem löngum hafa legið til grundvallar háloftaathugunum á Íslandi; slík viðbót yki víðfeðmi og tíðni háloftamælinga yfir Íslandi. Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................. vi List of Tables.................................................................................................... viii List of Acronyms .............................................................................................. ix 1 Introduction................................................................................................ 1 2 The structure of the atmosphere..................................................................... 2 3 Atmospheric dynamics.................................................................................. 5 3.1 Atmospheric forces and the movement of air................................................ 5 3.2 Mid-latitude weather fronts and the Norwegian Cyclone Model ....................... 6 4 Aviation meteorology .................................................................................... 9 5 Atmospheric profiling................................................................................... 10 5.1 Radiosondes ......................................................................................... 12 5.2 TAMDAR ............................................................................................ 14 6 Data ........................................................................................................... 17 7 Results and discussion .................................................................................. 19 7.1 Case 1 - 27 September 2016 ..................................................................... 20 The weather situation.............................................................................. 20 The measurements ................................................................................. 20 7.2 Case 2 - 29 September 2016 ..................................................................... 25 The weather situation.............................................................................. 25 The measurements ................................................................................. 26 7.3 Case 3 - 1 October 2016 .......................................................................... 32 The weather situation.............................................................................. 32 The measurements ................................................................................. 34 7.4 Case 4 - 2 October 2016 .......................................................................... 40 The weather situation.............................................................................. 40 The measurements ................................................................................. 40 7.5 Case 5 - 27 October 2016......................................................................... 47 The weather situation.............................................................................. 47 The measurements ................................................................................. 48 7.6 Spatial and temporal variations in the data ................................................... 54 8 Conclusions................................................................................................. 57 9 References .................................................................................................. 59 Conflict of Interests Declaration.......................................................................... 61 v List of Figures 1 The atmospheric layers and temperature profile ............................................ 4 2 Atmospheric airflow around lows and highs ................................................. 6 3 Formation and structure of a typical mid-latitude cyclone ............................... 8 4 An example of a METAR weather report..................................................... 9 5 An overview of various atmospheric profiling methods................................... 10 6 A radiosonde launch in action................................................................... 12 7 Different configurations of a modern radiosonde........................................... 13 8 A schematic overview of the TAMDAR sensor ............................................. 15 9 A TAMDAR sensor mounted on a jet aircraft ............................................... 16 10 The airspace of interest and colour representation of TAMDAR carrying aircraft . 18 11 Synoptic charts for Iceland on 27 September................................................ 20 12 Tracks of radiosonde and TAMDAR on 27 September ................................... 21 13 Temperature profiles of radiosonde and TAMDAR on 27 September ................. 22 14 Wind profiles of radiosonde and TAMDAR on 27 September .......................... 23 15 Relative humidity profiles of radiosonde and TAMDAR on 27 September .......... 24 16 Synoptic charts for Iceland on 29 September................................................ 25 17 Winds aloft observed over Iceland on 29 September ...................................... 26 18 Tracks of radiosonde and TAMDAR on 29 September ................................... 27 19 Temperature profiles of radiosonde and TAMDAR on 29 September ................. 28 20 Wind profiles of radiosonde and TAMDAR on 29 September .......................... 29 21 Relative humidity profiles of radiosonde and TAMDAR on 29 September .......... 30 22 Forecast relative humidity over Iceland on 29 September ................................ 31 23 Synoptic charts for Iceland on 1 October..................................................... 32 24 Synoptic chart from the UK Met Office showing fronts over the North Atlantic on 1 October......................................................................................... 33 25 Winds aloft observed over Iceland on 1 October ........................................... 33 26 Tracks of radiosonde and TAMDAR on 1 October......................................... 35 27 Temperature profiles of radiosonde and TAMDAR on 1 October ...................... 36 28 Wind profiles of radiosonde and TAMDAR on 1 October................................ 37 29 Relative humidity profiles of radiosonde and TAMDAR on 1 October ............... 38 30 Forecast relative humidity over Iceland on 1 October ..................................... 39 31 Synoptic charts for Iceland on 2 October..................................................... 40 32 Winds aloft forecast over Iceland on 2 October............................................. 41 33 Tracks of radiosonde and TAMDAR on 2 October......................................... 42 34 Temperature profiles of radiosonde and TAMDAR on 2 October ...................... 43 35 Wind profiles of radiosonde and TAMDAR on 2 October................................ 44 36 Relative humidity
Recommended publications
  • Innovative Mini Ultralight Radioprobes to Track Lagrangian Turbulence Fluctuations Within Warm Clouds: Electronic Design
    sensors Article Innovative Mini Ultralight Radioprobes to Track Lagrangian Turbulence Fluctuations within Warm Clouds: Electronic Design Miryam E. Paredes Quintanilla 1,* , Shahbozbek Abdunabiev 1, Marco Allegretti 1, Andrea Merlone 2 , Chiara Musacchio 2 , Eros G. A. Pasero 1, Daniela Tordella 3 and Flavio Canavero 1 1 Politecnico di Torino, Department of Electronics and Telecommunications (DET), Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy; [email protected] (S.A.); [email protected] (M.A.); [email protected] (E.G.A.P.); fl[email protected] (F.C.) 2 Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Str. Delle Cacce, 91, 10135 Torino, Italy; [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (C.M.) 3 Politecnico di Torino, Department of Applied Science and Technology (DISAT), Corso Duca Degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Characterization of dynamics inside clouds remains a challenging task for weather forecast- ing and climate modeling as cloud properties depend on interdependent natural processes at micro- and macro-scales. Turbulence plays an important role in particle dynamics inside clouds; however, turbulence mechanisms are not yet fully understood partly due to the difficulty of measuring clouds at the smallest scales. To address these knowledge gaps, an experimental method for measuring the influence of small-scale turbulence in cloud formation in situ and producing an in-field cloud Citation: Paredes Quintanilla, M.E.; Lagrangian dataset is being developed by means of innovative ultralight radioprobes. This paper Abdunabiev, S.; Allegretti, M.; presents the electronic system design along with the obtained results from laboratory and field exper- Merlone, A.; Musacchio, C.; Pasero, ≈ ≈ E.G.A.; Tordella, D.; Canavero, F.
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Forecast Impact from Aircraft, Profiler, Rawinsonde, VAD, GPS-PW, METAR and Mesonet Observations for Hourly Assimilation in the RUC
    16.2 Relative forecast impact from aircraft, profiler, rawinsonde, VAD, GPS-PW, METAR and mesonet observations for hourly assimilation in the RUC Stan Benjamin, Brian D. Jamison, William R. Moninger, Barry Schwartz, and Thomas W. Schlatter NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO 1. Introduction A series of experiments was conducted using the Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) model/assimilation system in which various data sources were denied to assess the relative importance of the different data types for short-range (3h-12h duration) wind, temperature, and relative humidity forecasts at different vertical levels. This assessment of the value of 7 different observation data types (aircraft (AMDAR and TAMDAR), profiler, rawinsonde, VAD (velocity azimuth display) winds, GPS precipitable water, METAR, and mesonet) on short-range numerical forecasts was carried out for a 10-day period from November- December 2006. 2. Background Observation system experiments (OSEs) have been found very useful to determine the impact of particular observation types on operational NWP systems (e.g., Graham et al. 2000, Bouttier 2001, Zapotocny et al. 2002). This new study is unique in considering the effects of most of the currently assimilated high-frequency observing systems in a 1-h assimilation cycle. The previous observation impact experiments reported in Benjamin et al. (2004a) were primarily for wind profiler and only for effects on wind forecasts. This new impact study is much broader than that the previous study, now for more observation types, and for three forecast fields: wind, temperature, and moisture. Here, a set of observational sensitivity experiments (Table 1) were carried out for a recent winter period using 2007 versions of the Rapid Update Cycle assimilation system and forecast model.
    [Show full text]
  • (Bruce Ingleby): EUMETNET Observation Impact Studies
    Observation impact studies: EUMETNET and other EWGLAM meeting, ECMWF, 2 Oct 2017 Bruce Ingleby and Lars Isaksen ECMWF [email protected] © ECMWF October 17, 2017 Outline • Use of aircraft humidity data • Test with data from U.S. aircraft 2014 • Latest O-B statistics • Pressure from drifting buoys and ships • Radiosonde experiments (not EUMETNET) • Treatment of radiosonde drift • Other: Russian 1 ascent/day, RS41 descent data • Summary • Tomas Kral helped, others credited in later slides • Thanks to EUMETNET for supporting aircraft/buoy work EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MEDIUM-RANGE WEATHER FORECASTS 2 ECMWF Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) system • Background (B) – 12 hour forecast – compared with observations (O), they are combined to make the Analysis – start of next forecast. • B and O have uncorrelated errors – very useful to look at O-B statistics • ECMWF produce daily coverage maps and monthly monitoring statistics feedback to data producers – partly via EUMETNET • Assessing usefulness of observations • Data denial studies (Observing System Experiments or OSEs) • Rerun NWP system without certain subsets of observations • Forecast Sensitivity to Observation Impact (FSOI) • Uses adjoint to estimate the contribution of each observation to reducing forecast error 24 hours later (relies on good analysis, linear approximation less good for near-surface variables, doesn’t look at cumulative effect) • See eg Cardinali (2009, QJ), Lorenc and Marriott (2014,QJ) EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MEDIUM-RANGE WEATHER FORECASTS 3 Extra aircraft data – especially
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of the Atmospheric Measurements by Ultra-Light Spectrometer (AMULSE) Greenhouse Gas Profiling System and Applica
    Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3099–3118, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3099-2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. The development of the Atmospheric Measurements by Ultra-Light Spectrometer (AMULSE) greenhouse gas profiling system and application for satellite retrieval validation Lilian Joly1, Olivier Coopmann2, Vincent Guidard2, Thomas Decarpenterie1, Nicolas Dumelié1, Julien Cousin1, Jérémie Burgalat1, Nicolas Chauvin1, Grégory Albora1, Rabih Maamary1, Zineb Miftah El Khair1, Diane Tzanos2, Joël Barrié2, Éric Moulin2, Patrick Aressy2, and Anne Belleudy2 1GSMA, UMR CNRS 7331, U.F.R. Sciences Exactes et Naturelles, Université de Reims, Reims, France 2CNRM, Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France Correspondence: Lilian Joly ([email protected]) and Olivier Coopmann ([email protected]) Received: 3 September 2019 – Discussion started: 25 September 2019 Revised: 4 April 2020 – Accepted: 22 April 2020 – Published: 12 June 2020 Abstract. We report in this paper the development of an em- files from the assimilation of infrared satellite observations. bedded ultralight spectrometer ( < 3 kg) based on tuneable The results show that the simulations of infrared satellite ob- diode laser absorption spectroscopy (with a sampling rate of servations from IASI (Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Inter- 24 Hz) in the mid-infrared spectral region. This instrument is ferometer) and CrIS (Cross-track Infrared Sounder) instru- dedicated to in situ measurements of the vertical profile con- ments performed in operational mode for numerical weather centrations of three main greenhouse gases – carbon dioxide prediction (NWP) by the radiative transfer model (RTM) RT- (CO2), methane (CH4) and water vapour (H2O) – via stan- TOV (Radiative Transfer for the TIROS Operational Ver- dard weather and tethered balloons.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT FARRINGTON, NATHANAEL CHRISTIAN. Numerical Weather Prediction of Stratus: Sensitivity to Aerosol Aware Microphysics. (
    ABSTRACT FARRINGTON, NATHANAEL CHRISTIAN. Numerical Weather Prediction of Stratus: Sensitivity to Aerosol Aware Microphysics. (Under the direction of Dr. Gary Lackmann.) Operational numerical weather prediction microphysics schemes commonly hold cloud droplet number concentration fixed domain-wide to increase computational efficiency. However, observations indicate wide variability of this quantity. Particularly, cloud condensation nucleus concentration has been observed to influence cloud droplet size, leading to changes in cloud radiative and microphysical properties. These changes have been shown to alter cloud depth, lifetime, and other characteristics of importance to operational forecasters. The advent of the Weather Research and Forecasting model version 3.6 includes the Thompson and Eidhammer radiation-coupled microphysics option which is double- moment for cloud water, accounts for some aerosol influences, and is designed for operational efficiency. Tests conducted here show that the new scheme successfully varies aerosol and cloud droplet number concentration temporally and spatially, while significantly altering the radiative properties and coverage of inland coastal stratus in the Pacific Northwest. However, tests also show that several other factors exercise greater sway over stratus coverage and lifetime relative to CCN concentration. © Copyright 2015 Nathanael C. Farrington All Rights Reserved Numerical Weather Prediction of Stratus: Sensitivity to Aerosol Aware Microphysics. by Nathanael C. Farrington A thesis submitted
    [Show full text]
  • Envisat GO MOS an Instrument for Global Atmospheric Ozone Monitoring
    SP-1244 ~·f~ esa_=··===+••· ··llll-l'.11~·----·-•• D Envisat GO MOS An Instrument for Global Atmospheric Ozone Monitoring European Space Agency Agence spatiale europeenne SP-1244 May 2001 Envisat GO MOS An Instrument for Global Atmospheric Ozone Monitoring European Space Agency Agence spatiale europeenne Short Title: SP-1244 'Envisat - GOMOS' Published by: ESA Publications Division ESTEC, P.O. Box 299 2200 AG Noordwijk The Netherlands Tel: +31 71 565 3400 Fax: +31 71 565 5433 Technical Coordinators: C. Readings & T. Wehr Editor. R.A. Harris Layout: Isabel Kenny Copyright: © European Space Agency 2001 Price: 30 Euros ISBN No: 92-9092-5 72-8 Printed in: The Netherlands ii Foreword This report is one of a series being <http://envisat.estec.esa.nl>. published to help publicise the A full listing of all the products European Space Agency's planned to be made available shortly environmental research satellite after the end of the commissioning Envisat, which is due to be launched phase (six months after launch) can be in the year 2001. It is intended to found in [ESA l 998b]. support the preparation of the Earth Observation community to utilise the The principal authors of this report measurements of the GOMOS are: (Global Ozone Monitoring by Occultation of Stars) instrument, J.-L. Bertaux, F. Dalaudier and which forms an important part of the A. Hauchecorne of the Service Envisat payload. The heritage of the dAeronomie du CNRS, Verrieres• GOMOS instrument is outlined here le-Buisson, France, M. Chipperfield and its scientific objectives, of the University of Leeds, Leeds, instrument concept, technical UK, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazardous Incident Rapid In-Flight Support Effort: Use of Asynoptic Upper-Air Data to Improve Weather Forecasts at Wildland Fires & Other Hazardous Incidents
    4.3 HI-RISE – HAZARDOUS INCIDENT RAPID IN-FLIGHT SUPPORT EFFORT: USE OF ASYNOPTIC UPPER-AIR DATA TO IMPROVE WEATHER FORECASTS AT WILDLAND FIRES & OTHER HAZARDOUS INCIDENTS Paul G. Witsaman* NOAA/NWS/Southern Region Headquarters, Ft. Worth, TX Jon W. Zeitler, Monte C. Oaks NOAA/NWS New Braunfels, TX Greg P. Murdoch, Seth R. Nagle+ NOAA/NWS Midland/Odessa, TX W.C. Hoffmann, B.K. Fritz USDA-ARS, College Station, TX 1. INTRODUCTION Quality weather forecasts for wildland fires Manual observations using a belt weather kit can and other hazardous material (HAZMAT) incidents be taken more frequently by the IMET or the depend on surface and upper air observations incident crew. along with model data. Often, meteorologists deploy directly to the wildfire or incident. These However, the spatial and temporal on-site meteorologists are called Incident resolution of upper air observations is much Meteorologists (IMETs). Off-site meteorological coarser. The average distance between support is also provided by National Weather rawinsonde stations in the Continental U.S. is 315 Service (NWS) Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs). km (Fig. 1; OFCM, 1997). These upper air observations are taken two times per day around Routine and non-routine surface 0000 and 1200 UTC. There is a processing and observations provide invaluable information to transmission time-delay of one to three hours from monitor current weather, warn others of impending the time of the upper air observation until data is hazards, and to improve incident forecasts. available for use by the IMET. Despite the spatial Surface observations from fixed Remote and temporal limitations of the synoptic upper air Automated Weather Station (RAWS) sites, observation network, IMETs use this data to make portable RAWS or other nearby sensors forecasts.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA TAMDAR Development
    Tropospheric Airborne Meteorological Data Aviation Safety and SecurityReporting Program (TAMDAR) Case Studies of T, Q, and V for the 2003 ATReC First THORPEX Symposium December 6-10, 2004 Montréal, Canada Taumi Daniels1, John Murray1, Dan Zhou1, George Tsoucalas1, Robert Neece1, Phil Schaffner1, Dan Mulally2, Mark Anderson2, Kristopher Jensen2, Tony Grainger3, Dave Delene3 1 NASA Langley Research Center 2 AirDat, LLC. 3 University of North Dakota 1st THORPEX Symposium Montréal, Canada Outline Aviation Safety and Security Program • TAMDAR System Overview • Flight Profile • Case Study • Results •Summary 1st THORPEX Symposium Montréal, Canada TAMDAR Concept Aviation Safety and Security Program Icing Cockpit Display Temperature Pressure Altitude Humidity Time Ground Station Lat / Long Winds* Turbulence* True Airspeed* AirDat TAMDAR Other Aircraft Sensor *computed 1st THORPEX Symposium Montréal, Canada TAMDAR Sensor Aviation Safety and Security Program 1st THORPEX Symposium Montréal, Canada TAMDAR System Aviation Safety and Security Program 1st THORPEX Symposium Montréal, Canada TAMDAR Specifications Aviation Safety and Security Program Parameter Range Accuracy Resolution Temperature -70 to +55Cº +/-1Cº 0.1Cº Relative 0 to 100% RH +/- 5% < 136 m/s 1% Humidity +/-10% > 136 m/s Wind Speed +/- 3.1 m/s 0.51 m/s Wind Direction +/- 5º 1º Pressure 0-4.5 km +/-45.72 m 3.05 m Altitude 4.5 - 7.6 km +/-76.2 m 3.05 m Pressure 10-101 kPa 3 hPa 0.05 hPa True Airspeed 36-231.5 m/s +/- 2.1 m/s 0.51 m/s Turbulence 0 - 20 cm2/3 / sec N/A N/A Ice Detection 0.51
    [Show full text]
  • World Weather Watch
    WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION Weather • Climate • Water WORLD WEATHER WATCH TWENTY-SECOND STATUS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION 2005 TWENTY-SECOND STATUS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION REPORT STATUS TWENTY-SECOND WMO-No. 986 — WWW WMO-No. 986 Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization – Geneva – Switzerland WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION Weather • Climate • Water WORLD WEATHER WATCH TWENTY-SECOND STATUS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION 2005 WMO-No. 986 Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization – Geneva – Switzerland © 2005, World Meteorological Organization ISBN 92-63-10986-9 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. C O N T E N T S Page FOREWORD............................................................................................................................................................... v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER I — INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and scope of the WWW Programme .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jp2.5 Madis Support for Urbanet
    To be presented at the 14th Symposium on Meteorological Observations and Instrumentation January 14 - 18, 2007, San Antonio, Texas JP2.5 MADIS SUPPORT FOR URBANET Patricia A. Miller*, Michael F. Barth, and Leon A. Benjamin1 NOAA Research – Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) Boulder, Colorado Richard S. Artz and William R. Pendergrass NOAA Research – Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) Silver Spring, Maryland 1. INTRODUCTION (API) that provides users with easy access to the data and QC information. The API allows each user to specify NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory’s station and observation types, as well as QC choices, Global Systems Division (ESRL/GSD) has established and domain and time boundaries. Many of the the MADIS (Meteorological Assimilation Data Ingest implementation details that arise in data ingest programs System) project to make integrated, quality-controlled are automatically performed, greatly simplifying user datasets available to the greater meteorological access to the disparate datasets, and effectively community. The goals of MADIS are to promote integrating the database by allowing, for example, users comprehensive data collection and distribution of to access NOAA surface observations, and non-NOAA operational and experimental observation systems, to surface mesonets through a single interface. decrease the cost and time required to access new MADIS datasets were first made publicly available observing systems, to blend and coordinate other- in July 2001, and have proven to be popular within the agency observations with NOAA observations, and to meteorological community. GSD now supports hundreds make the integrated observations easily accessible and of MADIS users, including NWS forecast offices, the usable to the greater meteorological community.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of TAMDAR Observational Error and Assimilation Experiments
    856 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 27 Estimation of TAMDAR Observational Error and Assimilation Experiments FENG GAO National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, and Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China XIAOYAN ZHANG National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado NEIL A. JACOBS AirDat LLC, Morrisville, North Carolina XIANG-YU HUANG AND XIN ZHANG National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado PETER P. CHILDS AirDat LLC, Morrisville, North Carolina (Manuscript received 8 October 2011, in final form 16 March 2012) ABSTRACT Tropospheric Airborne Meteorological Data Reporting (TAMDAR) observations are becoming a major data source for numerical weather prediction (NWP) because of the advantages of their high spatiotemporal resolution and humidity measurements. In this study, the estimation of TAMDAR observational errors, and the impacts of TAMDAR observations with new error statistics on short-term forecasts are presented. The observational errors are estimated by a three-way collocated statistical comparison. This method employs collocated meteorological reports from three data sources: TAMDAR, radiosondes, and the 6-h forecast from a Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF). The performance of TAMDAR observations with the new error statistics was then evaluated based on this model, and the WRF Data Assimilation (WRFDA) three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVAR) system. The analysis was conducted for both January and June of 2010. The experiments assimilate TAMDAR, as well as other conventional data with the exception of non-TAMDAR aircraft observations, every 6 h, and a 24-h forecast is produced. The standard deviation of the observational error of TAMDAR, which has relatively stable values regardless of season, is comparable to radiosondes for temperature, and slightly smaller than that of a radiosonde for relative hu- midity.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Weather Capability Assessment
    Aviation Weather Capability Assessment Michael Konyak, FAA ANG-C41 Mark Thuli, CSSI, Inc. Loretta DiDonato, CSSI, Inc. Rebecca Stanley, Hi-Tec Systems, Inc. April 2014 DOT/FAA/TC-TN14/9 [THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] ii NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturer's names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. This document does not constitute FAA certification policy. iii [THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] iv Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. DOT/FAA/TC-TN14/9 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date April 2014 Aviation Weather Capability Assessment 6. Performing Organization Code ANG-C41 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Michael Konyak, FAA ANG-C41; Mark Thuli, CSSI, Inc.; Loretta DiDonato, CSSI, Inc.; Rebecca Stanley, Hi-Tec Systems, Inc. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration, William J. Hughes Technical Center 11. Contract or Grant No. Atlantic City International Airport, NJ 08405 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U. S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Technical Note 800 Independence Avenue, SW 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, DC 20591 ANG-C64 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract The focus of this document is to summarize the relevant information on the key weather products used in the National Airspace System today that are within scope of the Federal Aviation Administration Concept Analysis Branch’s (ANG- C41) Weather Requirements Validation Methodology.
    [Show full text]