DOCSLIB.ORG

ABSTRACT FARRINGTON, NATHANAEL CHRISTIAN. Numerical Weather Prediction of Stratus: Sensitivity to Aerosol Aware Microphysics. (

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ABSTRACT FARRINGTON, NATHANAEL CHRISTIAN. Numerical Weather Prediction of Stratus: Sensitivity to Aerosol Aware Microphysics. (Under the direction of Dr. Gary Lackmann.) Operational numerical weather prediction microphysics schemes commonly hold cloud droplet number concentration fixed domain-wide to increase computational efficiency. However, observations indicate wide variability of this quantity. Particularly, cloud condensation nucleus concentration has been observed to influence cloud droplet size, leading to changes in cloud radiative and microphysical properties. These changes have been shown to alter cloud depth, lifetime, and other characteristics of importance to operational forecasters. The advent of the Weather Research and Forecasting model version 3.6 includes the Thompson and Eidhammer radiation-coupled microphysics option which is double- moment for cloud water, accounts for some aerosol influences, and is designed for operational efficiency. Tests conducted here show that the new scheme successfully varies aerosol and cloud droplet number concentration temporally and spatially, while significantly altering the radiative properties and coverage of inland coastal stratus in the Pacific Northwest. However, tests also show that several other factors exercise greater sway over stratus coverage and lifetime relative to CCN concentration. © Copyright 2015 Nathanael C. Farrington All Rights Reserved Numerical Weather Prediction of Stratus: Sensitivity to Aerosol Aware Microphysics. by Nathanael C. Farrington A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Raleigh, North Carolina 2015 APPROVED BY: _______________________________ _______________________________ Dr. Gary Lackmann Dr. Walter Robinson Committee Chair _______________________________ Dr. Anantha Aiyyer DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my wife, Kristen, who continues to set aside her dreams to chase a life with me, and to my Father, brothers, and sisters. You carry me when I am too weak to walk and without you I would not be where I am today. ii BIOGRAPHY Nate Farrington is originally from Scottsdale, Arizona. He grew up amazed at the power, in awe of the lightning, humbled by the bone-rattling thunder, and intrigued by the ominous haboobs of North American Monsoon thunderstorms. Nate has been a forecaster in the Air Force weather community for over 15 years. During his career, he has issued operational aviation forecasts for airspace over every continent and every ocean on the planet except the Arctic, served tours to Iraq and Afghanistan, supported the Special Operations community, and even broadcasted weather forecasts to 1.1 million Defense and State department viewers worldwide for the American Forces Network. Nate has a wonderful family, including three beautiful children and a lovely and talented wife of almost 16 years. Nate and his family have lived and worked in Germany and six different U.S. states. Nate assembled his undergraduate degree from five different brick and mortar institutions over ten years of rotating shift work and raising a family, culminating in a degree in Natural Science and Mathematics from Thomas Edison State College in 2010. He enrolled in the Atmospheric Science graduate program at North Carolina State University in fall of 2013 where he has been working under the guidance of Dr. Gary Lackmann. Upon finishing his Master’s degree, Nate will join the 16th Weather Squadron, part of the Air Force Weather Agency, where he will help the Air Force exploit the latest in science and technology to provide responsive, accurate, and relevant weather information to the warfighter, the intelligence community, and other national agencies. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like express gratitude to my advisor, Dr. Gary Lackmann, for the vision and patience to conduct this project with me. His calm and steady hand guided this endeavor through storm and drought; I am indebted to him for his kindness and understanding. I would also like to thank my thesis committee members, Dr. Walter Robinson and Dr. Anantha Aiyyer, for keeping the project soundly grounded in the scientific and meteorological principles to which this thesis’ processes are subject. I would also like to thank Dr. Sandra Yuter and Dr. Matt Miller for giving me their honesty, time, and technical expertise. I thank the United States Air Force and the Air Force Institute of Technology, Civilian Institutions Program for funding this assignment. A very responsive Technical Sergeant Precious Monk at the 14th Weather Squadron (14WS) provided tens of thousands of observations crucial to this analysis. I extend a special thank you to Dr. Neil Jacobs and his team at Panasonic AirDat for gracious access to their proprietary aircraft observations and software. The National Climatic Data Center provided North American Mesoscale Model analyses. The National Center for Atmospheric Research made the Weather Research and Forecasting model available to the public. I am grateful to Unidata for the incredibly user friendly Integrated Data Viewer platform and University of Wisconsin’s Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies for their imagery. I particularly want to express my gratitude to Dr. Greg Thompson and Trude Eidhammer for their vision and work to modernize the microphysics of operational Numerical Weather Prediction. My lab mates, Xiaoyu Long, Chris Marciano, Allison Michaelis, Jennifer Tate, Lindsay Blank, and colleagues, Matthew Morriss, Dianna Francisco, Jeffery Willison, Andy iv Meier, Josh Tobias, and Maj Adam DeMarco provided technical assistance and friendship which made this great task easier to bear. My friend, Suchit Mehrotra, aided greatly with statistical analysis software. I would also like to thank Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps Detachment 595 Commander, Lt Col Jay Allen, for the motivation, competition, mentorship, and friendship with which he led me. I humbly acknowledge Air Force and Army Special Operations aviators who, with weather bubbas Mr. John White and Mr. Jerry Gaunt, inspired this project and perpetually inspire me. Special operator Chief Warrant Officer 4 Paul Dulfer provided helpful maps and information. I would like to extend thanks to Mr. Randall Kallenbach and Mr. Stephen Chesser for their mentorship and friendship throughout the years, and for encouraging me to do this. Finally, I thank my family who have supported and believed in me. I want to thank my dad and mom, Tim and Linda, whose dedication to God, each other, and their professions have helped make me who I am, and whose long arm of love I felt through many valleys. I want to thank my younger brother, Phil, for wisely teaching and admonishing me with psalms and hymns and spiritual songs. I would like to thank my children, Riley, Parker, and Madison, for their resilience and love when my work robbed them of my best time and energy. Above these, I pour out my profound gratitude to my stunning wife, Kristen. I have built my career and life upon the confidence of her selfless support, tireless friendship, and skillful encouragement. Ultimately, I give thanks for all trials and success in the name of my hope, the Lord Jesus Christ, to God the Father and Creator from whose “counsel and dominion” this “most beautiful system” proceeds (Newton 1687). v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................... ix 1. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 1.1. Motivation ..........................................................................................................................1 1.1.1. Low Cloud Impacts on Military Aviation ....................................................................1 1.1.2. Low Cloud Impacts on Civilian Aviation ....................................................................4 1.1.3. Impacts of Low Clouds on Radiation ...........................................................................4 1.2 Background ........................................................................................................................6 1.2.1 Stratus Formation and Dissipation Processes ..............................................................6 1.2.2 Cloud Droplet Formation ...............................................................................................7 1.2.3 Cloud-Aerosol Interactions and Radiation ...................................................................8 1.2.4 Model Cloud-Aerosol Interactions and Radiation .....................................................10 1.2.4.1 Model Physics Parameterizations .............................................................................12 1.2.5 Thompson and Eidhammer (2014) Microphysics ......................................................16 1.2.5.1 Aerosol Input ..............................................................................................................17 1.2.5.2 Explicit Calculation of Aerosols ...............................................................................17 1.3 Science Questions .............................................................................................................19
Recommended publications
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories

    United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories

    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
  • Major Commands and Air National Guard

    Major Commands and Air National Guard

    2019 USAF ALMANAC MAJOR COMMANDS AND AIR NATIONAL GUARD Pilots from the 388th Fighter Wing’s, 4th Fighter Squadron prepare to lead Red Flag 19-1, the Air Force’s premier combat exercise, at Nellis AFB, Nev. Photo: R. Nial Bradshaw/USAF R.Photo: Nial The Air Force has 10 major commands and two Air Reserve Components. (Air Force Reserve Command is both a majcom and an ARC.) ACRONYMS AA active associate: CFACC combined force air evasion, resistance, and NOSS network operations security ANG/AFRC owned aircraft component commander escape specialists) squadron AATTC Advanced Airlift Tactics CRF centralized repair facility GEODSS Ground-based Electro- PARCS Perimeter Acquisition Training Center CRG contingency response group Optical Deep Space Radar Attack AEHF Advanced Extremely High CRTC Combat Readiness Training Surveillance system Characterization System Frequency Center GPS Global Positioning System RAOC regional Air Operations Center AFS Air Force Station CSO combat systems officer GSSAP Geosynchronous Space ROTC Reserve Officer Training Corps ALCF airlift control flight CW combat weather Situational Awareness SBIRS Space Based Infrared System AOC/G/S air and space operations DCGS Distributed Common Program SCMS supply chain management center/group/squadron Ground Station ISR intelligence, surveillance, squadron ARB Air Reserve Base DMSP Defense Meteorological and reconnaissance SBSS Space Based Surveillance ATCS air traffic control squadron Satellite Program JB Joint Base System BM battle management DSCS Defense Satellite JBSA Joint Base
  • Relative Forecast Impact from Aircraft, Profiler, Rawinsonde, VAD, GPS-PW, METAR and Mesonet Observations for Hourly Assimilation in the RUC

    Relative Forecast Impact from Aircraft, Profiler, Rawinsonde, VAD, GPS-PW, METAR and Mesonet Observations for Hourly Assimilation in the RUC

    16.2 Relative forecast impact from aircraft, profiler, rawinsonde, VAD, GPS-PW, METAR and mesonet observations for hourly assimilation in the RUC Stan Benjamin, Brian D. Jamison, William R. Moninger, Barry Schwartz, and Thomas W. Schlatter NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO 1. Introduction A series of experiments was conducted using the Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) model/assimilation system in which various data sources were denied to assess the relative importance of the different data types for short-range (3h-12h duration) wind, temperature, and relative humidity forecasts at different vertical levels. This assessment of the value of 7 different observation data types (aircraft (AMDAR and TAMDAR), profiler, rawinsonde, VAD (velocity azimuth display) winds, GPS precipitable water, METAR, and mesonet) on short-range numerical forecasts was carried out for a 10-day period from November- December 2006. 2. Background Observation system experiments (OSEs) have been found very useful to determine the impact of particular observation types on operational NWP systems (e.g., Graham et al. 2000, Bouttier 2001, Zapotocny et al. 2002). This new study is unique in considering the effects of most of the currently assimilated high-frequency observing systems in a 1-h assimilation cycle. The previous observation impact experiments reported in Benjamin et al. (2004a) were primarily for wind profiler and only for effects on wind forecasts. This new impact study is much broader than that the previous study, now for more observation types, and for three forecast fields: wind, temperature, and moisture. Here, a set of observational sensitivity experiments (Table 1) were carried out for a recent winter period using 2007 versions of the Rapid Update Cycle assimilation system and forecast model.
  • (Bruce Ingleby): EUMETNET Observation Impact Studies

    (Bruce Ingleby): EUMETNET Observation Impact Studies

    Observation impact studies: EUMETNET and other EWGLAM meeting, ECMWF, 2 Oct 2017 Bruce Ingleby and Lars Isaksen ECMWF [email protected] © ECMWF October 17, 2017 Outline • Use of aircraft humidity data • Test with data from U.S. aircraft 2014 • Latest O-B statistics • Pressure from drifting buoys and ships • Radiosonde experiments (not EUMETNET) • Treatment of radiosonde drift • Other: Russian 1 ascent/day, RS41 descent data • Summary • Tomas Kral helped, others credited in later slides • Thanks to EUMETNET for supporting aircraft/buoy work EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MEDIUM-RANGE WEATHER FORECASTS 2 ECMWF Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) system • Background (B) – 12 hour forecast – compared with observations (O), they are combined to make the Analysis – start of next forecast. • B and O have uncorrelated errors – very useful to look at O-B statistics • ECMWF produce daily coverage maps and monthly monitoring statistics feedback to data producers – partly via EUMETNET • Assessing usefulness of observations • Data denial studies (Observing System Experiments or OSEs) • Rerun NWP system without certain subsets of observations • Forecast Sensitivity to Observation Impact (FSOI) • Uses adjoint to estimate the contribution of each observation to reducing forecast error 24 hours later (relies on good analysis, linear approximation less good for near-surface variables, doesn’t look at cumulative effect) • See eg Cardinali (2009, QJ), Lorenc and Marriott (2014,QJ) EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MEDIUM-RANGE WEATHER FORECASTS 3 Extra aircraft data – especially
  • Net Shore-Drift of King County, Washington Michael Chrzastowski Western Washington University

    Net Shore-Drift of King County, Washington Michael Chrzastowski Western Washington University

    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Spring 1982 Net Shore-Drift of King County, Washington Michael Chrzastowski Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Chrzastowski, Michael, "Net Shore-Drift of King County, Washington" (1982). WWU Graduate School Collection. 732. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/732 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NET SHORE-DRIFT OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Western Washington University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requiremei)ts for the Degree Master of Science .A* by Michael J. Chrzastowski June, 1982 NET SHORE-DRIFT OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON by Michael J. Chrzastowski Accepted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Dean of Graduate Sc ADVISORY COMMITTEE WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Bellingham, Washington 98225 • [2Q6] 676-3000 MASTER'S THESIS In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master's degree at Western Washington University, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this thesis is allowable only for scholarly purposes. It is understood, however, that any copying or publication of this thesis for commercial purposes, or for financial gain, shall not be allowed without my written permission.
  • Anderson and Ketron Islands Community Plan

    Anderson and Ketron Islands Community Plan

    Appendix B: Anderson - Ketron Islands Community Plan The Anderson - Ketron Islands Community Plan’s narrative text and policies are in addition to the Countywide Comprehensive Plan narrative text and policies and are only applicable within the Anderson-Ketron Islands Community Plan Boundary. • “Current” or “Existing” conditions are in reference to conditions at time of adoption (Adopted Ord. 2009-9s, Effective 6/1/2009). • “Proposed” or “Desired” conditions are those which required Council action and may have also been amended over time through a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (amendments are reflected in this document). CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................. B-6 Overview of the Plan Area ....................................................................................................... B-6 The Environment .................................................................................................................. B-7 History of Anderson Island....................................................................................................... B-7 Early History ......................................................................................................................... B-7 Early 20th Century ............................................................................................................... B-7 Industry, Commerce, and Services ...................................................................................... B-8 History of
  • Key Peninsula News Community Pages Editor: Connie Renz Marsh, Tom Zimmerman

    Key Peninsula News Community Pages Editor: Connie Renz Marsh, Tom Zimmerman

    Non-Profi t Organization U.S. Postage Memorial Day PAID Wauna, WA No school 98395 May 27 Permit No. 2 BOX HOLDER KEY KEY PENINSULA www.keypennews.com THE VOICE OF THE KEY PENINSULA VOL. 42 NO. 5 Former KP MAY 2013 resident nets Online Olympic team spot By Scott Turner, KP News All through middle school and high school, Megan Blunk excelled in sports. She ran track and played basketball in middle school. At Peninsula High School she played soccer, fast pitch, basketball, Spring Fling Art volleyball and ran track. • Pinewood Derby rolls on On July 20, 2008 – two months after graduating from PHS – her life changed • Masters Dry Cleaning hits 15 forever. “I got into a motorcycle accident in Bel- • Fire District 16 fi re reports fair,” Blunk said. “I broke my back and became paralyzed from the waist down.” Become a fan on Facebook (See Blunk, Page 2) Follow us on Twitter keypennews.com Local equestrians Inside meet with KP Parks Cleaning up the Key By Rick Sorrels, KP News -- Page 24 Thirty-nine local equestrians (horse afi cio- nados) hosted an initial meeting at Volunteer News Park on April 15 to discuss forming a com- News ................................. 1-5, 7,9 mittee to develop a plan for equestrian use of park land. The intention is to eventually have Sections a fully developed plan to present to the KP Op-Ed Views ............................. 6-8 Park’s Board for consideration. Photo by Scott Turner, KP News Schools .............................. 10-11 In 2005 a very popular series of meetings Homecoming hug took place to discuss the same subject, with Jaxin Patrick got a surprise visit at Evergreen Elementary school from Community Pages .................
  • Pacific Harbors Council Camp Thunderbird Conceptual

    Pacific Harbors Council Camp Thunderbird Conceptual

    PACIFIC HARBORS COUNCIL CAMP THUNDERBIRD CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN APRIL 10, 2017 Version 1 DISCUSSION DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Camp Redevlopment Overview ............................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Pacific Harbors Mission Statement ..................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1.3 Project Scope ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Plan Map .................................................................................................................................... 2 2 Situational Assessment ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Property ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Traditional Map .................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Parcel Map ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Camp
  • Hazardous Incident Rapid In-Flight Support Effort: Use of Asynoptic Upper-Air Data to Improve Weather Forecasts at Wildland Fires & Other Hazardous Incidents

    Hazardous Incident Rapid In-Flight Support Effort: Use of Asynoptic Upper-Air Data to Improve Weather Forecasts at Wildland Fires & Other Hazardous Incidents

    4.3 HI-RISE – HAZARDOUS INCIDENT RAPID IN-FLIGHT SUPPORT EFFORT: USE OF ASYNOPTIC UPPER-AIR DATA TO IMPROVE WEATHER FORECASTS AT WILDLAND FIRES & OTHER HAZARDOUS INCIDENTS Paul G. Witsaman* NOAA/NWS/Southern Region Headquarters, Ft. Worth, TX Jon W. Zeitler, Monte C. Oaks NOAA/NWS New Braunfels, TX Greg P. Murdoch, Seth R. Nagle+ NOAA/NWS Midland/Odessa, TX W.C. Hoffmann, B.K. Fritz USDA-ARS, College Station, TX 1. INTRODUCTION Quality weather forecasts for wildland fires Manual observations using a belt weather kit can and other hazardous material (HAZMAT) incidents be taken more frequently by the IMET or the depend on surface and upper air observations incident crew. along with model data. Often, meteorologists deploy directly to the wildfire or incident. These However, the spatial and temporal on-site meteorologists are called Incident resolution of upper air observations is much Meteorologists (IMETs). Off-site meteorological coarser. The average distance between support is also provided by National Weather rawinsonde stations in the Continental U.S. is 315 Service (NWS) Weather Forecast Offices (WFOs). km (Fig. 1; OFCM, 1997). These upper air observations are taken two times per day around Routine and non-routine surface 0000 and 1200 UTC. There is a processing and observations provide invaluable information to transmission time-delay of one to three hours from monitor current weather, warn others of impending the time of the upper air observation until data is hazards, and to improve incident forecasts. available for use by the IMET. Despite the spatial Surface observations from fixed Remote and temporal limitations of the synoptic upper air Automated Weather Station (RAWS) sites, observation network, IMETs use this data to make portable RAWS or other nearby sensors forecasts.
  • Federal Lightning Capability Requirements

    Federal Lightning Capability Requirements

    Federal Lightning Capability Requirements Credit: NOAA Photo Library, NOAA Central Library; OAR/ERL/National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research Silver Spring, Maryland July 2008 Federal Lightning Capability Requirements Federal Lightning Capability Requirements CONTENTS Contents .......................................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 1-1 2 Lightning Requirements by Agency...................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Department of Defense ................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.1 US Army ................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.2 US Navy & Marine Corps....................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.3 US Air Force ........................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Department of Commerce/National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.......... 2-3 2.2.1 National Weather Service ....................................................................................... 2-3 2.2.2 Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research.......................................................
  • NASA TAMDAR Development

    NASA TAMDAR Development

    Tropospheric Airborne Meteorological Data Aviation Safety and SecurityReporting Program (TAMDAR) Case Studies of T, Q, and V for the 2003 ATReC First THORPEX Symposium December 6-10, 2004 Montréal, Canada Taumi Daniels1, John Murray1, Dan Zhou1, George Tsoucalas1, Robert Neece1, Phil Schaffner1, Dan Mulally2, Mark Anderson2, Kristopher Jensen2, Tony Grainger3, Dave Delene3 1 NASA Langley Research Center 2 AirDat, LLC. 3 University of North Dakota 1st THORPEX Symposium Montréal, Canada Outline Aviation Safety and Security Program • TAMDAR System Overview • Flight Profile • Case Study • Results •Summary 1st THORPEX Symposium Montréal, Canada TAMDAR Concept Aviation Safety and Security Program Icing Cockpit Display Temperature Pressure Altitude Humidity Time Ground Station Lat / Long Winds* Turbulence* True Airspeed* AirDat TAMDAR Other Aircraft Sensor *computed 1st THORPEX Symposium Montréal, Canada TAMDAR Sensor Aviation Safety and Security Program 1st THORPEX Symposium Montréal, Canada TAMDAR System Aviation Safety and Security Program 1st THORPEX Symposium Montréal, Canada TAMDAR Specifications Aviation Safety and Security Program Parameter Range Accuracy Resolution Temperature -70 to +55Cº +/-1Cº 0.1Cº Relative 0 to 100% RH +/- 5% < 136 m/s 1% Humidity +/-10% > 136 m/s Wind Speed +/- 3.1 m/s 0.51 m/s Wind Direction +/- 5º 1º Pressure 0-4.5 km +/-45.72 m 3.05 m Altitude 4.5 - 7.6 km +/-76.2 m 3.05 m Pressure 10-101 kPa 3 hPa 0.05 hPa True Airspeed 36-231.5 m/s +/- 2.1 m/s 0.51 m/s Turbulence 0 - 20 cm2/3 / sec N/A N/A Ice Detection 0.51
  • World Weather Watch

    World Weather Watch

    WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION Weather • Climate • Water WORLD WEATHER WATCH TWENTY-SECOND STATUS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION 2005 TWENTY-SECOND STATUS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION REPORT STATUS TWENTY-SECOND WMO-No. 986 — WWW WMO-No. 986 Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization – Geneva – Switzerland WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION Weather • Climate • Water WORLD WEATHER WATCH TWENTY-SECOND STATUS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION 2005 WMO-No. 986 Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization – Geneva – Switzerland © 2005, World Meteorological Organization ISBN 92-63-10986-9 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. C O N T E N T S Page FOREWORD............................................................................................................................................................... v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER I — INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and scope of the WWW Programme .........................................................................................................