Randall Kennedy Portrait D'un Intellectuel Noir Décalé

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Randall Kennedy Portrait D'un Intellectuel Noir Décalé ART PRESS 2 NOV 12/JAN 13 8 RUE FRANCOIS-VILLON Trimestriel 75015 PARIS - 01 53 68 65 65 Surface approx. (cm²) : 2802 Page 1/7 RANDALL KENNEDY PORTRAIT D'UN INTELLECTUEL NOIR DÉCALÉ SYLVIE LAURENT Lorsque Randall Kennedy publie Nigger en 2003, il marque une date clé de l'historiographie afro-américaine et rompt, dans le même souffle, avec une carrière jusqu'alors conventionnelle de professeur de droit de la très exclusive université d'Harvard. Ne dans un Sud raciste (la Caroline du Sud) ou les Noirs ne pouvaient boire aux mêmes fontaines que les Blancs, Randal! Kennedy s'est émancipe du racisme et de sa propre colere en suivant une scola- rité brillante dans des ecoles majoritairement blanches (l'école privee St-Albans de Washington puis l'université de Princeton) ou il se forme a la pensée qui lui apparaît rapidement comme la plus conforme a sa quête d'équilibre et de réconciliation le droit Juriste reconnu, il est un des rares Noirs a pénétrer le sem des seins la Harvard Law School ll rejoint la f acuity (c'est-a dire le corps profes- soral) de l'emmente institution en 1984 ou son enseignement portera sur les questions raciales et la loi aux États-Unis1 Ses publications nombreuses et prestigieuses confortent une position unanime- ment saluée parmi ses pairs La publication, en 2002, de son livre le plus célèbre-en raison d'un titre qui scandalisa-, Nigger The Strange Career of a Tmublesome Word, change radicalement le cours de sa trajectoire profes- sionnelle en consacrant une etude polémique au mot le plus infamant et le plus insupportable aux oreilles des Noirs américains, il gagne une notoriété qui dépasse largement les cercles universitaires maîs lui aliène dans le même temps une bonne partie de l'élite afro américaine Randall Kennedy entre alors sur la scene du debat racial aux Etats-Unis et l'on voit en lui le chantre du conservatisme Cette tension originelle, dialectique peut être, est a l'image de sa carriere entière une alternance, com plementaire a ses yeux, entre une reflexion académique profonde et engagée sur les logiques raciales a l'œuvre dans la societe (incarcération, processus électoral, adoption, amour interracial ) et des incursions revendiquées sur les terres de la controverse mtellec- tuelle qui ne l'intimida jamais Randall Kennedy est a ce titre l'un des mtel- lectuels les plus stimulants de l'Ame- nc|ue con1;emPoraine brisant avec délectation l'image d'Epinal de l'um- versitaire noir-américain «liberal»2, «oblige de sa communaute» Lorsque Randall Kennedy entame sa carriere universitaire, les temps sont encore marques par les guerres cul- turelles nees des annees 1960 Les campus américains, et les départe- ments de droit singulièrement, sont en proie a de violentes polémiques raciales au début des annees 1990, le debat faisant rage autour du « multi- culturalisme» et de son application Randall Kennedy au monde universitaire d'un bout a (©u Gunther/sipa TEMPLON Eléments de recherche : GALERIE DANIEL TEMPLON : à Paris 3ème, toutes citations 3211524300508/GFS/AZR/2 ART PRESS 2 NOV 12/JAN 13 8 RUE FRANCOIS-VILLON Trimestriel 75015 PARIS - 01 53 68 65 65 Surface approx. (cm²) : 2802 Page 2/7 I autre du pays les representants des minorités (sexuelles ou ethniques) reclament un de centrement des enseignements qui sont selon eux prisonniers d'une logique de domination blanche et mascu- line Ils reclament non seulement la creation de départements multiculturels (d etudes afro améri- caines, féministes ou gays et lesbiennes) maîs aussi le recrutement de professeurs incarnant la diversite américaine Certains soutiennent alors qu'il existe une façon de percevoir le monde et de l'enseigner propres aux universitaires de couleur et qu'il faut qu elle soit promue jusque dans les bas lions les plus recules du conservatisme universitaire Les ecoles de droit ne sont pas les moindres exemples de ce conservatisme elitiste3 et la nomination de Randall Kennedy a Harvard doit se lire a cette lumiere Or, d emblée, ce dernier s'est désolidarise de cette vision « racialisee» des competences etde I impératif multiculturel Des 1989, dans un article de \aHarvard Law Review, il pourfend les avo- cats de cette these au nom d'un humanisme « aveugle a la race » (colorblind), affirmant qu'aucun de leurs arguments sur la discrimination a l'œuvre n est etaye réfutant de surcroît I argument de la valeur ajoutee intellectuelle apportée par un representant des minorités4 Cette charge positionne imme diatement et radicalement Randall Kennedy dans le camp des conservateurs et, pire encore, des Noirs déloyaux qui trahissent leurs freres de couleur En america n, on leur donne un nom se/tout dont Ken nedy, lui qui entendit souvent cette cruelle accusation, étudiera toutes les connotations dans un ouvrage eponyme de 2008 DE L'INDIFFÉRENCE RACIALE Son premier ouvrage, Race, Crime and the Law5, publie dix ans plus tard, est une dénonciation impi- toyable du mécanisme délétère qui mené a une surrepresentation des hommes de couleur dans les prisons américaines quinze ans avant le meurtre de Treyvon Martin, il affirme que si les Noirs consti tuent 44,8% des hommes incarcères aux Etats Unis alors qu'ils ne sont que 12% de la population totale e est a cause d une hyper pénalisation de la délinquance urbaine elle même liee a une peur paranoïaque savamment entretenue de l'homme noir americain L'ouvrage, salue par le prix Robert F Kennedy pose Randall Kennedy comme un universitaire résolument progressiste pionnier dans la dénonciation des permanences du racisme institutionnalise aux Etats-Unis Maîs, ici encore son approche rompt avec le ton militant et indigne de ceux qui, tels Jesse Jackson ou Al Sharpton6, accu- sent alors tout policier blanc d'être un raciste en uniforme ll pose, au contraire, comme préalable a son argumentation, que les hommes noirs commettent proportionnellement plus de crimes que les Blancs et qu'un certain degré de discrimination lors des arrestations, peut être juge « rationnel » ll démontre que c'est en réalité une attitude nocive, non seulement pour les Noirs maîs pour l'ensem- ble du systeme judiciaire americain a force d'injustices pénales et de violences policières non punies, l'amertume des Afro Américains progresse et nuit a la cohesion nationale Sans mettre en avant la moindre « fierté noire » ou « colere noire » propre a l'époque, Randall Kennedy se fait l'avocat de l'indifférence raciale et plaide, en somme, pour une societe post raciale En avance d une gene- ration, il paiera le prix de sa modération en étant souvent cloue au pilori par I intelligentsia noire Cette derniere exprima sa réprobation avec force invectives, en deux occasions marquantes de la vie intellectuelle audacieuse de Randall Kennedy lors de la publication de Nigger The Strange Careerofa Troublesome Word1, son ouvrage phare de 2002 et, six ans plus tard, lorsqu il publie Sel- /out8 Dans Nigger, il propose une analyse academ que brillante et pionnière d'un mot tabou, syno- nyme d'oppression et d'humiliation pour les Noirs américains Si I apport scientifique de l'ouvrage n est pas mis en cause, I inscription de ce terme-stigmate en couverture du livre et l'ouverture d'un debat public autour de deux syllabes que I on n'ose plus vraiment prononcer ont choque A contre- temps, Randall Kennedy y propose une reflexion dépassionnée et constructive pour progresser vers l'harmonie raciale, refusant de diaboliser ce mot en réalité riche d'ambivalences et d'ambiguïtés, telles que la litterature, la comedie ou la musique l'ont illustre Sur un sujet aussi polémique, son centrisme lui attire de nouveau les foudres des plus radicaux On l'accuse, entre autres, de sensationnalisme et de démagogie raciale Même ses collègues d Harvard le condamnent Le plus remarquable sans doute, est que malgre la virulence et I injustice de ces attaques. Ken- nedy a poursuivi ses collaborations auprès d'institutions ouvertement progressistes tels The Nation, Dissent ou The American Prospect, se définissant sans ambages comme un ntellectuel de gauche sans pour autant renoncer a prendre des positions bien différentes de celles que l'on attendrait d'un intellectuel noir liberal Lorsqu'il défend la figure honnie de Clarence Thomas, juge noir de la Cour suprême, dans son livre de 2008, il suscite de nouveau la controverse Clarence Thomas, hostile aux politiques à'affirmative action -de reparation pour les injustices faites aux Noirs (alors que lui même TEMPLON Eléments de recherche : GALERIE DANIEL TEMPLON : à Paris 3ème, toutes citations 3211524300508/GFS/AZR/2 ART PRESS 2 NOV 12/JAN 13 8 RUE FRANCOIS-VILLON Trimestriel 75015 PARIS - 01 53 68 65 65 Surface approx. (cm²) : 2802 Page 3/7 en a certainement bénéficié)-est devenu, pour nombre de gens de couleur, l'incarnation du «traître a sa race » • sellout Or, répond Kennedy, ce qualificatif insultant ne devrait pas s'appliquer à Thomas -il lui reconnaît le droit de défendre des positions conservatrices, n'en déplaise aux tenants d'une cause noire univoque, et refuse l'argument de la déloyauté dont il a lui-même éte victime tout au long de sa carriere Libre-penseur, Kennedy refuse de taire les errances et les prisons discursives dans les- quelles les Noirs eux-mêmes s'enferment en se discriminant les uns les autres, en accusant de traî- trise celui des Afro-Américains qui, par sa réussite sociale ou sa position de franc-tireur, ne complaît pas à la majorité LAMOUR IME VOIT PAS LA RACE ll n'est pas exagéré de lire la carrière et le travail de Randall Kennedy comme un signe avant-courrier de l'arrivée de Ba rack Obama sur la scène politique
Recommended publications
  • Crack Cocaine, Congressional Inaction, and Equal Protection
    CRACK COCAINE, CONGRESSIONAL INACTION, AND EQUAL PROTECTION PAUL J. LARKIN, JR.* I. THE HISTORY OF FEDERAL DRUG POLICY ........... 244 II. CRACK COCAINE, RACE, AND EQUAL PROTECTION LAW ................................................. 249 A. Legislation and Equal Protection Law ....... 250 B. Legislative Inaction and Equal Protection Law .................................................................. 258 1. The Article I Lawmaking Process ......... 259 2. The Due Process Clause ......................... 263 3. Equal Protection Principles ................... 271 III. CRACK COCAINE, RACE, AND FEDERAL DRUG POLICY .................................................................... 278 IV. CONCLUSION ......................................................... 294 Criminal justice policy, drug policy, and racial policy are three of the most contentious subjects in contemporary Ameri- can society.1 For the past thirty years, they have intersected be- cause of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986.2 Enacted in the midst of a panic over the emergence of a new form of cocaine * Senior Legal Research Fellow, The Heritage Foundation; M.P.P., George Wash- ington University, 2010; J.D., Stanford Law School, 1980; B.A., Washington & Lee University, 1977. The views expressed in this Article are the author’s own and should not be construed as representing any official position of The Heritage Foun- dation. I want to thank Paul Cassell, Daniel Dew, Andrew Kloster, Joseph Luppino- Esposito, and Greg Maggs for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this Article. Any remaining errors are mine. 1. For discussions of these subjects, see, for example, MICHELLE ALEXANDER, THE NEW JIM CROW: MASS INCARCERATION IN THE AGE OF COLORBLINDNESS (rev. ed. 2012); STEVEN B. DUKE & ALBERT C. GROSS, AMERICA’S LONGEST WAR: RETHINKING OUR TRAGIC CRUSADE AGAINST DRUGS (1993); RANDALL KENNEDY, RACE, CRIME, AND THE LAW (1997); GLENN C.
    [Show full text]
  • Discriminatory Acquittal
    William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 18 (2009-2010) Issue 1 Article 4 October 2009 Discriminatory Acquittal Tania Tetlow Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons Repository Citation Tania Tetlow, Discriminatory Acquittal, 18 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 75 (2009), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol18/iss1/4 Copyright c 2009 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj DISCRIMINATORY ACQUITTAL Tania Tetlow* ABSTRACT This article is the first to analyze a pervasive and unexplored constitutional problem: the rights of crime victims against unconstitutional discrimination by juries. From the Emmett Till trial to that of Rodney King, there is a long history of juries acquitting white defendants charged with violence against black victims. Modem empirical evidence continues to show a devaluation of black victims; dramatic dis- parities exist in death sentence and rape conviction rates according to the race of the victim. Moreover, just as juries have permitted violence against those who allegedly violated the racial order, juries use acquittals to punish female victims of rape and domestic violence for failing to meet gender norms. Statistical studies show that the "appropriateness" of a female victim's behavior is one of the most accurate predictors of conviction for gender-based violence. Discriminatory acquittals violate the Constitution. Jurors may not constitutionally discriminate against victims of crimes any more than they may discriminate against defendants. Jurors are bound by the Equal Protection Clause because their verdicts constitute state action, a point that has received surprisingly little scholarly analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Race Theory's Attack on the Promises of Liberalism Jeffrey J
    Boston College Law Review Volume 40 Issue 3 Association Of American Law Schools Program Article 6 On Race & Criminal Justice 5-1-1999 Race, Equality and the Rule of Law: Critical Race Theory's Attack on the Promises of Liberalism Jeffrey J. Pyle [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the African American Studies Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Ethnic Studies Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Race and Ethnicity Commons Recommended Citation Jeffrey J. Pyle, Race, Equality and the Rule of Law: Critical Race Theory's Attack on the Promises of Liberalism, 40 B.C.L. Rev. 787 (1999), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol40/iss3/6 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RACE, EQUALITY AND THE RULE OF LAW: CRITICAL RACE THEORY'S ATTACK ON THE PROMISES OF LIBERALISM I NTRODUCTION In recent years, critical race theory ("CRT") has come to occupy a conspicuous place in American law schools.' The theory holds that despite the great victories of the civil rights movement, liberal legal thought2 has consistently failed African Americans and other minori- I See generally Stephanie 14. Goldberg, The Law, a New Theory Holds, Has a White Voice, N.Y. TIMES, July 17, 1992, at A23 (describing critical race theory as having had "all undeniable impact on legal education"); Neil A.
    [Show full text]
  • Instructor's Guide
    The Fight for Free Speech Ten Cases That Define Our First Amendment Freedoms BY IAN ROSENBERG Instructor’s Guide A user’s guide to understanding contemporary free speech issues in the United States Americans today are confronted by a barrage of questions relating to their free speech freedoms. What are libel laws, and do they need to be changed to stop the press from lying? Does Colin Kaepernick have the right to take a knee? Can Saturday Night Live be punished for parody? While citizens are grappling with these questions, they generally have nowhere to turn to learn about the extent of their First Amendment rights. The Fight for Free Speech answers this call with an accessible, engaging user’s guide to free speech. Media lawyer Ian Rosenberg distills the spectrum of free speech law down to ten critical issues. Each chapter in this book focuses on a contemporary free speech question—from student walkouts for gun safety to Samantha Bee’s expletives, from Nazis marching in Charlottesville to the muting of adult film star Stormy Daniels— and then identifies, unpacks, and explains the key Supreme Court case that provides the answers. Together these fascinating stories create a practical framework for understanding where our free speech protections originated and how they can develop in the future. As people on all sides of the political spectrum are demanding their right to speak and be heard, The Fight for Free Speech is a handbook for combating authoritarianism, protecting our democracy, and bringing an understanding of free speech law to all. 312 pages | Cloth | 9781479801565 • • • Law | Politics | Current Events Ian Rosenberg has over twenty years of experience as a media lawyer, and has worked as legal counsel for ABC News since 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Higginbotham
    UNIVERSITY OF BALTIMORE SCHOOL OF LAW FALL SEMESTER 2017 SYLLABUS RACE AND THE LAW LAW 823-511 (4099) MICHAEL HIGGINBOTHAM COURSE DETAILS Professor: Michael Higginbotham Time: Designated Wednesdays (see schedule of classes) 9:00 – 11:45 am Course Category: Upper-Level Limited Enrollment Elective Classroom: University of Baltimore School of Law Angelos Law Center AL 602 Office Hours: Mondays 1:00 – 2:00 pm Wednesdays noon – 1:00 pm (or by appointment) Office: University of Baltimore School of Law Angelos Law Center AL 1115 Phone: 410-837-4649 E-mail: [email protected] Twitter: @professorhigg Website: fmichaelhigginbotham.org Assistant: Shavaun O’Brien Office: University of Baltimore School of Law Angelos Law Center AL 1112 Phone: 410-837-4635 E-mail: [email protected] Facsimile: 410-837-4560 TWEN/Web: Syllabus, distributed materials, announcements, and assignments available on TWEN or http://law.ubalt.edu/academics/Semester.cfm Texts: Required: A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr., In the Matter of Color: Race and the American Legal Process, The Colonial Period (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978). Available in hardback or paperback at the University of Baltimore Bookstore. 1 A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr., Shades of Freedom: Racial Politics and Presumptions of the American Legal Process (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996). Available in hardback or paperback at the University of Baltimore Bookstore. F. Michael Higginbotham, RACE LAW: Cases, Commentary, and Questions (Fourth Edition) (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2015). Available in hardback at the University of Baltimore Bookstore. F. Michael Higginbotham, Ghosts of Jim Crow: Ending Racism in Post-Racial America (New York: New York University Press, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Disparate Effects in the Criminal Justice System: a Response to Randall Kennedy's Comment and Its Legacy
    UCLA National Black Law Journal Title Disparate Effects in the Criminal Justice System: A Response to Randall Kennedy's Comment and Its Legacy Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4b57c56b Journal National Black Law Journal, 14(2) ISSN 0896-0194 Author Nelson, Janai S. Publication Date 1997 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Disparate Effects in the Criminal Justice System: A Response to Randall Kennedy's Comment and Its Legacy Janai S. Nelson* I. INTRODUCTION For many African Americans, the criminal justice system symbolizes an oppressive force, and yet, is a necessary institution in an increasingly lawless society. We' are at the same time its victims and beneficiaries, although various sentiments exist regarding the extent to which we are either. It is precisely this paradox, coupled with the promulgation of cer- tain criminal legislation and legal precedent which directly and, potentially, adversely affect the African-American community, 2 that inspired me to ad- dress the issues and arguments raised in Randall Kennedy's The State, CriminalLaw, and Racial Discrimination:A Comment3 and their resound- ing implications.4 In particular, this Essay focuses on two timely and controversial law enforcement issues facing the courts and the African-American commu- nity: the crack/powder cocaine distinction in criminal statutes and selective prosecution claims based on the disparity between federal and state sen- tencing schemes. I examine the experiences of our community that shape our response to these issues by addressing the constitutional claims raised by African-American defendants in two portentous criminal cases-one state and one federal-and confronting important arguments made by Kennedy in the areas of law enforcement and constitutional analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Racial Passing
    Racial Passing RANDALL KENNEDY* I. PASSING: A DEFINrIoN Passing is a deception that enables a person to adopt certain roles or identifies from which he would be barred by prevailing social standards in the absence of his misleading conduct. The classic racial passer in the United States has been the "white Negro": the individual whose physical appearance allows him to present himself as "white" but whose "black" lineage (typically only a very partial black lineage) makes him a Negro according to dominant racial rules. A passer is distinguishable from the person who is merely mistaken-the person who, having been told that he is white, thinks of himself as white, and holds himself out to be white (though he and everyone else in the locale would deem him to be "black" were the facts of his ancestry known).' Gregory Howard Williams was, for a period, such a person.2 The child of a white mother and a light-skinned Negro man who pretended to be white, Williams assumed that he, too, was white.3 Not until he was ten years old, when his parents * B.A. Princeton University, J.D. Yale Law School. This essay was derived from the 1998-1999 Frank R. Strong Law Forum Lecture delivered at The Ohio State University College of Law. 1 Some blacks have unknowingly been perceived as white. St. Clair Drake and Horace R. Cayton relate the experiences of a fair-skinned Negro woman who was initially treated with respect by a storeowner. Unbeknownst to her, the white proprietor took her to be a white person.
    [Show full text]
  • Blacks and the Race Question at Harvard Randall
    INTRODUCTION: BLACKS AND THE RACE QUESTION AT HARVARD RANDALL KENNED Y The history of blacks at Harvard mirrors, for better or for worse, the history o f black s i n th e Unite d States . Harvard , too , ha s been in - delibly scarred b y slavery, exclusion, segregation, an d other form s o f racist oppression. A t the same time, the nation's oldest university has also supported an d allowe d itsel f t o b e influence d b y th e variou s reform movements that have dramatically changed the nature of race relations acros s th e nation . Th e stor y o f black s a t Harvar d i s thus inspiring but painful, instructive but ambiguous—a paradoxical episode in the most vexing controversy of American life: "th e race question." The evolution of the race question at Harvard is tellingly displayed by the documents tha t hav e been collecte d her e b y Werner Sollors , Caldwell Titcomb, and Thomas A. Underwood. Tw o salient character- istics distinguis h th e collection . Th e firs t i s th e ric h variet y o f it s sources. Include d in this documentary history are scholarly overviews, poems, short stories , speeches, well-known memoir s b y the famous , previously unpublishe d memoir s b y th e lesse r known , newspape r accounts, letters, officia l paper s o f th e university , an d transcript s o f debates. Th e editors bring to their compilation persons as diverse as Booker T Washington , Monroe Trotter, William Hastie, Malcolm X, and Muriel Snowden to convey the complex and various ways in which Harvard has affected th e thinking of African Americans and the ways, in turn, in which African American s have influenced th e traditions of Harvard and Radcliffe.
    [Show full text]
  • Thurgood Marshall Memorial Lecture Roger Williams University School of Law
    Roger Williams University DOCS@RWU Conferences, Lectures & Events School of Law Publications 2-12-2014 Thurgood Marshall Memorial Lecture Roger Williams University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.rwu.edu/law_pubs_conf Recommended Citation Roger Williams University School of Law, "Thurgood Marshall Memorial Lecture" (2014). Conferences, Lectures & Events . Paper 54. http://docs.rwu.edu/law_pubs_conf/54 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law Publications at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Conferences, Lectures & Events by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thurgood Marshall Memorial Lecture Wednesday, February 12, 2014 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm | Ten Metacom Avenue, Bristol, Rhode Island Thurgood Marshall Memorial Lecture Featuring Harvard Law Professor Randall Kennedy Sponsored by Hinckley Allen 1:00 p.m. RWU Law Room 262 The School of Law presents its sixth lecture in this series, which honors the memory of Thurgood Marshall. Thurgood Marshall was a key architect of the legal strategy that convinced the Supreme Court to declare unconstitutional the doctrine of “separate but equal,” which had allowed racial segregation in public education and many other aspects of American life. Thurgood Marshall later served with distinction and as a protector of civil rights as Solicitor General of the United States and later as the first African-American Justice on the United States Supreme Court. Randall Kennedy is Michael R. Klein Professor at Harvard Law School where he teaches courses on contracts, criminal law, and the regulation of race relations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law Academy and the Public Intellectual Arthur Austin Case Western Reserve University School of Law
    Roger Williams University Law Review Volume 8 | Issue 2 Article 2 Spring 2003 The Law Academy and the Public Intellectual Arthur Austin Case Western Reserve University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.rwu.edu/rwu_LR Recommended Citation Austin, Arthur (2003) "The Law Academy and the Public Intellectual," Roger Williams University Law Review: Vol. 8: Iss. 2, Article 2. Available at: http://docs.rwu.edu/rwu_LR/vol8/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Roger Williams University Law Review by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES The Law Academy and the Public Intellectual Arthur Austin* I. INTRODUCTION A. Posner in Decline? The Wolfes I of the Received Wisdom got the opportunity for a good old payback time when Judge Richard Posner stumbled with the publication of Public Intellectuals:A Study of Decline.2 Per- haps expectations were too high for someone esteemed as the na- tion's preeminent intellectual - the "object of scholarly envy and awe."3 Certainly he could not expect favors after "an omni direc- tional Gatling gun" spree in which he hurls bombs at every other pretender 4 and, relying on "his own hunches and grudges," 5 deter- mines the boundaries of who is a Public Intellectual. 6 Alan Wolfe, who made the cut, complains that Posner's decisions "are not merely arbitrary; they are nonsensical." 7 But it was not the crite- * Edgar A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of Professor Derrick A. Bell's Thesis of the Permanence of Racism and His Strategy of Confrontation
    Denver Law Review Volume 73 Issue 1 Article 5 January 2021 A Critique of Professor Derrick A. Bell's Thesis of the Permanence of Racism and His Strategy of Confrontation Leroy D. Clark Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/dlr Recommended Citation Leroy D. Clark, A Critique of Professor Derrick A. Bell's Thesis of the Permanence of Racism and His Strategy of Confrontation, 73 Denv. U. L. Rev. 23 (1995). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Denver Law Review at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. A CRITIQUE OF PROFESSOR DERRICK A. BELL'S THESIS OF THE PERMANENCE OF RACISM AND HIS STRATEGY OF CONFRONTATION LEROY D. CLARK* INTRODUCTION Professor Derrick A. Bell's book, Faces at the Bottom of the Well: The Permanence of Racism,' challenges tenets and ideals deeply held by civil rights organizations and by the larger liberal-integrationist community. Profes- sor Bell charges that white society has never relinquished, and more impor- tantly, will never relinquish, a deep-rooted racism, and that there has been, even in recent history, no true diminution in racial discrimination. I will endeavor to counter Professor Bell's claims by examining the his- torical record and by interpreting current American culture. Critics have yet to give Professor Bell's claims the fully objective assessment they merit,2 al- though one can always characterize the dispute as a "glass is half empty or half full" problem.3 I will therefore confront something quite deeper which is * Professor of Law, Catholic University Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigger: a Critical Race Realist Analysis of the N-Word Within Hate Crimes Law, 98 J
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 98 Article 3 Issue 4 Summer Summer 2008 Nigger: A Critical Race Realist Analysis of the N- Word within Hate Crimes Law Gregory S. Parks Shayne E. Jones Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Gregory S. Parks, Shayne E. Jones, Nigger: A Critical Race Realist Analysis of the N-Word within Hate Crimes Law, 98 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1305 (2007-2008) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/08/9804-1305 THE JOURNALOF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 98, No. 4 Copyright © 2008 by Northwestern University, School of Law Printed in U.S.A. "NIGGER": A CRITICAL RACE REALIST ANALYSIS OF THE N-WORD WITHIN HATE CRIMES LAW GREGORY S. PARKS* & SHAYNE E. JONES** A word is not a crystal, transparent and unchanged, it is the skin of a living thought and may vary greatly in color and content according to the circumstances and the time in which it is used. -- Oliver Wendell Holmes Although the slang epithet "nigger" may once have been in common usage ... [it] has become particularly abusive and insulting ... as it pertains to the American Negro. 2 -Louis H. Burke [C]rimes motivated by bigotry usually arise not out of the pathological rantings and ravings of a few deviant types in organized hate groups, but out of the very mainstream of society.
    [Show full text]