DOCSLIB.ORG

262 Jamestown and Port Gamble Surreply

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
262 Jamestown and Port Gamble Surreply Case 2:11-sp-00002-RSM Document 262 Filed 04/02/19 Page 1 of 5 1 The Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., No. C70-9213 10 Plaintiffs, Subproceeding 11-2 11 vs. SURREPLY 12 STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants. 13 14 15 SURREPLY 16 The Port Gamble S’Klallam and Jamestown S’Klallam Tribes respond solely to the 17 Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe’s Request to Strike (Dkt. # 260) the Declaration of Josh Wisniewski 18 with Exhibits A, C, D, and E (Dkt. # 256) and the Declaration of Barbara Lane (Dkt # 249, Ex. 19 F), and all supporting arguments in citation thereto. This response is filed pursuant to LCR 1 20 7(g). When Lower Elwha (“Elwha”) proposed a travel route that was specifically contradicted 21 1 The S’Klallam recognize that while LCR 7(g) is not perfectly on point with respect to the present circumstances, it is the closest rule that would address the “Request to Strike” filed with the Lower Elwha Reply Brief. Alternatively, 22 the S’Klallam request leave to submit this surreply. Notice was filed of intent to file the surreply on April 1, 2019. Dkt. # 261. 23 SURREPLY, C70-9213, SUBPROCEEDING 11-2 - 1 - Case 2:11-sp-00002-RSM Document 262 Filed 04/02/19 Page 2 of 5 1 by the Court’s expert, they opened the door to the S’Klallam’s full defense to that asserted route. 2 See e.g., Williams v. Woodford, 384 F.3d 567, 620 (9th Cir. 2002) (recognizing right to present 3 rebuttal evidence when the other party opens the door). The request should be denied. 4 Declaration of Josh Wisniewski 5 Elwha requests this court strike and ignore the examination of Dr. Lane’s reports by a person with relevant expertise. Declaration of Josh Wisniewski. Dkt. # 256, Dkt. # 260. 6 Tellingly, their assertions do not deny the accuracy or truthfulness of the analysis of the Boldt 7 record. And, in fact, their objection speaks to the need to brush facts aside or completely ignore 8 the record in order to carve out a completely erroneous boundary line, a route Dr. Lane swore 9 under oath that she never addressed in her report. Dkt. # 249, p. 43:14-16. Dr. Wisniewski’s 10 declaration uses only exhibits admitted in U.S. v. Washington. Fed. R. Evid. 702 contemplates 11 the use of an expert (such as an anthropologist) to parse the record, if it will “help the trier of fact 12 understand the evidence . .”). In this case, common practice to date has been for the lawyers 13 to parse the record in the briefs. See e.g., Dkt.# 167, 168, 176. However, here, it is more 14 probative to the ultimate issue if an anthropologist examines the historical record in a similar 15 way using his expertise on the value of the reference to an area in one report by the same author 16 and the absence of a similar reference in another report. This direct comparison of the Tribes’ 17 histories is not only helpful, but necessary, to decide the question posed by Elwha. The 18 declaration does not violate Muckleshoot I not only because no one is imputing Judge Boldt’s 19 intent from latter day evidence, but also because the Declaration “sheds light” in terminology 20 used in the decree. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. Lummi Indian Nation, 141 F. 3d 1355, 1359-60 21 (9th Cir. 1998) (“Muckleshoot I”); Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. Lummi Indian Nation, 234 F.3d 22 1099, 1100 (9th Cir. 2000) (“Muckleshoot II”) (finding it was proper to consider the opinion of a 23 SURREPLY, C70-9213, SUBPROCEEDING 11-2 - 2 - Case 2:11-sp-00002-RSM Document 262 Filed 04/02/19 Page 3 of 5 1 geography expert to shed light on where the “present environs of Seattle” were located at the 2 time of the Boldt decision). Instead, the Elwha seek to deny S’Klallam all opportunity to rebut 3 Elwha’s claim, which would be a clear error. 4 Further, by moving to eliminate the evidence and all analysis of it the Elwha seek to deny 5 the S’Klallam the only evidence in the Boldt record that considers which Tribe had fishing rights at Point Wilson (the southern terminus of Lower Elwha’s line). The fact that Point Wilson is a 6 reference point for S’Klallam use—not Lummi, allows for an argument regarding the accuracy 7 and equity of the proposed boundary. Dkt. # 256, p. 2 (Point Wilson line does not accurately 8 characterize the western boundary); p. 112 (“Their proper country lies on the straits between the 9 Okeho River and Point Wilson….”). Dr. Lane’s report also sheds light on the contemporary 10 geography of the area, including the fact that in 1855 the treaty negotiator, George Gibbs, 11 considered the Strait of Juan de Fuca to extend from Cape Classet to Port Townsend. Dkt. # 256, 12 pp. 64, 65. The fact that Point Wilson is on the Strait of Juan de Fuca is highly relevant here. 13 Dkt. # 256, p. 149 (“This point [Point Wilson] is where the waters of Puget Sound run into the 14 Strait of Juan de Fuca.”) It is obvious that these historical references “shed light” on the 15 geography in the decree, and the boundary line proposed by Elwha. Muckleshoot v. Lummi 16 Indian Tribe, 141 F.3d 1355, 1359-60 (9th Cir. 1998). The Declaration of Josh Wisniewski 17 examines only documents that are part of the record and previously filed in U.S. v. Washington, 18 and thus should not be stricken—nor should the examination of that record by a person with 19 relevant expertise be stricken if the same analysis is fair game for an attorney. 20 Declaration of Barbara Lane 21 The Declaration of Barbara Lane (Dkt. # 249) is already part of the record and the request 22 is untimely. It was submitted in Sub. 89-2, and it was submitted again with the Motion to 23 SURREPLY, C70-9213, SUBPROCEEDING 11-2 - 3 - Case 2:11-sp-00002-RSM Document 262 Filed 04/02/19 Page 4 of 5 1 Amend. Dkt. # 249, previously filed April 7, 1989, Dkt. # 11263. It is submitted to rebut the 2 assertion that a specific travel route was already adjudicated by this court, not to determine Judge 3 Boldt’s intent. The Elwha opened the door for a consideration of whether this proposed route is 4 likely or unlikely, and why. Lower Elwha waived their objection when they failed to timely 5 move to strike under LCR 7(g)(1) in response to the filing of the declaration almost a month ago. Dkt. # 249, p. 40. Failure to timely file a surreply results in a waiver of the admissibility of the 6 evidence. Ennin v. CNH Indus. Am., LLC, 878 F.3d 590, 598 (7th Cir. 2017) (where the rule 7 expressly permits a surreply to object to evidence filed with a Reply brief, the failure to file a 8 response is the essence of waiver). 9 CONCLUSION 10 For the foregoing reasons, the request to strike should be denied. 11 12 Respectfully Submitted, this 2nd Day of April, 2019. 13 14 s/ Lauren P. Rasmussen 15 Lauren P. Rasmussen, WSBA # 33256 Law Offices of Lauren P. Rasmussen, PLLC 16 1904 Third Avenue, Suite 1030 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 623-0900 17 [email protected] 18 Attorney for the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe and the Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribes 19 20 21 22 23 SURREPLY, C70-9213, SUBPROCEEDING 11-2 - 4 - Case 2:11-sp-00002-RSM Document 262 Filed 04/02/19 Page 5 of 5 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that I served the foregoing Surreply to the Lower Elwha Klallam Reply 3 and Request to Strike using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of the filing to all 4 parties in this matter who are registered with the Court’s CM/ECF filing system. 5 DATED this 2nd Day of April, 2019. 6 7 s/ Lauren P. Rasmussen Lauren P. Rasmussen, WSBA # 33256 8 Law Offices of Lauren P. Rasmussen, PLLC 1904 Third Avenue, Suite 1030 9 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 623-0900 10 [email protected] 11 Attorney for the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe and the Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 SURREPLY, C70-9213, SUBPROCEEDING 11-2 - 5 - .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fort Worden State Park •Glaciers •Bluffs •Beaches •The Human Hand
    The Geology of Fort Worden State Park •Glaciers •Bluffs •Beaches •The Human Hand Geologic processes created the land we call Fort Worden—and the land will continue to change as water, wind, gravity, people, and time influence this beautiful part of Washington. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ GLACIERS The land you see all around you is a legacy of glacial activity. About two million years ago a great, global Ice Age began. During the Ice Age, at least six glacial cycles occurred in the Puget Sound region. Each glacier— immense lobes of ice extending from the Canadian ice sheet—ground its way southward, gouging and shoving the terrain it crossed and carrying immense loads of rock from the north that were deposited as the ice moved and melted. During warmer interglacial periods, the climate was similar to today. The most recent ice advance, the Fraser Glaciation, entered Washington about 18,000 years ago. While the Puget lobe slowly filled the existing lowland between the Olympic Mountains and the Cascade Range, the Juan de Fuca lobe moved westward in the area that is now the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Global sea level dropped as water was bound up in the ice masses. At its greatest regional extent about 17,000 years ago, the ice was as much as 4,000 feet thick at Port Townsend, and its great weight pressed the land surface in this area down about 200 feet below its present level. The global climate soon began to re-warm, and sea level rose. By about 16,000 years ago, most of the ice here had melted away, leaving this region under a shallow sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Existing Facilities 2010 Plan Update: the Multi-Purpose Trail Inventory in the 2002 Plan Shows the Length of the Larry Scott Trail As 4.0 Miles
    Jefferson County Non-Motorized Transportation and Recreational Trails Plan 2010 Chapter 3: Existing Facilities 2010 Plan Update: The multi-purpose trail inventory in the 2002 Plan shows the length of the Larry Scott Trail as 4.0 miles. This included both trail segments constructed to the County’s adopted standards and the existing “usage” trail on the railroad grade. Since the adoption of the 2002 Plan, Jefferson County has constructed additional trail segments. The constructed trail length is now 4.4 miles. Volunteers have developed additional segments that extend the trail to S. Discovery Road at the Discovery Bay Golf Course. These segments, while useable, are not constructed to the County’s standards and are not included in the current inventory. The remaining trail right-of-way has been acquired to the Milo Curry Road / S. Discovery Road intersection near Four Corners. Construction of the remaining trail segments is planned for substantial completion in 2011. The trail length will then be 7.6 miles. The remainder of this chapter was not revised for the 2010 Plan update. It has been retained in the original 2002 Plan format. Jefferson County, Port Townsend, Port Ludlow, Port of Port Townsend, Washington State, National Forest and Park Services, and other public and private agencies have assembled a significant inventory of non-motorized transportation and recreational trail systems within Jefferson County. These systems provide a variety of on and off-road opportunities for walking, hiking, bicycling, horse, and hand launch boat activities throughout the county. The 1998 County Comprehensive Plan provides a very limited description of the non-motorized transportation and recreational trail facilities in Jefferson County.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 -- Puget Sound, Washington
    514 Puget Sound, Washington Volume 7 WK50/2011 123° 122°30' 18428 SKAGIT BAY STRAIT OF JUAN DE FUCA S A R A T O 18423 G A D A M DUNGENESS BAY I P 18464 R A A L S T S Y A G Port Townsend I E N L E T 18443 SEQUIM BAY 18473 DISCOVERY BAY 48° 48° 18471 D Everett N U O S 18444 N O I S S E S S O P 18458 18446 Y 18477 A 18447 B B L O A B K A Seattle W E D W A S H I N ELLIOTT BAY G 18445 T O L Bremerton Port Orchard N A N 18450 A 18452 C 47° 47° 30' 18449 30' D O O E A H S 18476 T P 18474 A S S A G E T E L N 18453 I E S C COMMENCEMENT BAY A A C R R I N L E Shelton T Tacoma 18457 Puyallup BUDD INLET Olympia 47° 18456 47° General Index of Chart Coverage in Chapter 13 (see catalog for complete coverage) 123° 122°30' WK50/2011 Chapter 13 Puget Sound, Washington 515 Puget Sound, Washington (1) This chapter describes Puget Sound and its nu- (6) Other services offered by the Marine Exchange in- merous inlets, bays, and passages, and the waters of clude a daily newsletter about future marine traffic in Hood Canal, Lake Union, and Lake Washington. Also the Puget Sound area, communication services, and a discussed are the ports of Seattle, Tacoma, Everett, and variety of coordinative and statistical information.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Washington State Birding Trail  OLYMPIC LOOP
    OLYMPIC LOOP INDEX Sites Page Sites Page INFO KEY 1 1 Nisqually National 2 32 Morse Creek 8 Wildlife Refuge 33 Dungeness National Wildlife 2 Tumwater Historical Park Refuge 3 Capitol Lake 34 Dungeness River Audubon 4 Grass Lake Refuge Center 5 McLane Creek Nature 3 35 Dungeness Bay Trail 36 John Wayne Marina 6 Kennedy Creek 37 Jimmycomelately Creek 9 7 Friends Landing 38 Protection Island National 8 Grays Harbor National Wildlife Refuge Wildlife Refuge 39 Kah Tai Lagoon Park 9 Humptulips Estuary 4 40 Fort Worden State Park 10 Damon Point 41 Chimacum Creek Estuary 11 Ocean Shores North Jetty 42 Fort Flagler State Park 12 Point Grenville 43 Big Quilcene River 10 13 Campbell Tree Grove Estuary 14 Lake Quinault 44 Mt. Walker 15 Kalaloch Creek 5 45 Dosewallips State Park 16 4th Beach 46 Hamma Hamma Beaver Pond 17 Hoh Rainforest 47 Potlatch State Park 11 18 Anderson Homestead 48 Skokomish Delta 19 La Push 49 Twanoh State Park 20 Quillayute River Estuary 50 GeorgeAdamsSalmon 21 Lake Ozette 6 Hatchery 22 Hobuck Beach 51 Panhandle Lake 4H Camp 23 Cape Flattery 52 Oakland Bay 24 Clallam Bay Park 53 Jarrell Cove State Park 25 Pillar Point County Park 54 Theler Wetlands 12 26 Salt Creek County Park 7 27 Elwha River Estuary CREDITS 12 28 Lake Crescent 29 Whiskey Bend Trail 30 Hurricane Ridge © Ed Newbold, Tufted Puffins 31 Ediz Hook The Great Washington State Birding Trail 1 OLYMPIC LOOP INFO KEY MAp Icons LocAl SERVices And Highlights Best seasons for birding( spring, summer, fall,winter) Overall Washington: www.experiencewashington.com Olympic BirdFest: First weekend in April, Developed camping available, including restrooms; fee required.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Jefferson County Bicycle Map North Beach Co
    Admiralty Inlet Strait of Juan de Fuca Map Legend Eastern Jefferson County Bicycle Map North Beach Co. Park P.S. Express T 4ft + 2ft to 4ft No h POINT WILSON pugetsoundexpress.com re e C This map is intended to provide information to cyclists so that they can make their own decisions as to which route is 360/385-5288 Shoulder Shoulder Shoulder r Introduction ab s Fort Worden State Park Ferry to San Juan Islands R suited for their skill level. Facilities on the Olympic Peninsula range from narrow roads with no shoulders to roads with bike lanes or wide d 49th St shoulders, separated trails with no motorized traffic to off-road mountain bike trails. Likewise, vehicular traffic varies from low to high on the ek re W St C Washington State Ferries e y roads throughout the area. v r A e k ve l o Port Townsend–Coupeville Route a o Walnut St s s C Jackson St wsdot.wa.gov/ferries a C The roads have been coded with input from local bicycle commuters, recreational cyclists 888/808-7977 d Port Townsend Jamestown R and transportation planners using criteria important to bicyclists. Grade, pavement A Juan San Caution Area: narrow roads, poor visibility or no shoulders Fir St Protection Island Cherry St n condition, paved shoulder width, vehicle travel lane width, traffic volumes and F St Monroe St L Hastings Ave Visitor Information Center x POINT o Olympic Discovery Trail: Off-road On-Road c speed were some of the factors used in determining the suitability of the National Wildlife Refuge l e 360/385-2722 i v HUDSON A Woodcock Rd W s Strangers enjoypt.com roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson County, Washington Historic Time Line
    Jefferson County, Washington Historic Time Line 1774 Juan Perez commands the first Spanish expedition to explore the Northwest Coast and sights the Olympic Mountains. 1775 Bruno de Hezeta lands on the Washington coast and claims the area for Spain. 1778 James Cook (British) explores and charts the Northwest Coast. 1790 Manual Quimper (Spanish) takes formal possession of Neah Bay for Spain on August 1, 1790. 1792 Robert Gray (American) names the Columbia River after his ship. George Vancouver (British) explores and names Puget Sound. Spain establishes the first non-Indian settlement in Washington at Neah Bay. 1808 The Russian sailing ship "St. Nicholas", with 21 on board, is wrecked near Destruction Island in what is present day Jefferson County on November 1, 1808. The survivors were taken as slaves by the Quileute Indians and held for nearly 3 years. 13 were eventually ransomed by Capt. Brown of the U.S.S. "Lydia" in May 1811. 1841 United States naval expedition, headed by Charles Wilkes, explores Port Townsend Bay and other points in Washington. 1843-1845 First large pioneer immigration to area of modern day Oregon and Washington occurs and temporary government established. 1846 Treaty between United States and Great Britain sets U.S. boundary at 49th parallel in 1846. 1848 Oregon Territory created in 1848. 1851-1852 Port Townsend's first white settlers arrived on April 24, 1851, a year before those in Seattle. By May of 1852, the total population of Port Townsend consisted of three families and fifteen bachelors. Jefferson County, Oregon Territory was created from the original Lewis County, Oregon Territory on December 22, 1852.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map GM-57, Geologic Map of the Port Townsend North And
    WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES GEOLOGIC MAP GM-57 122°52¢30² R2W R1W 50¢ 47¢30² 122°45¢ GEOLOGIC SETTING Landslide deposits—Gravel, sand, silt, clay, and boulders; clasts angular to Deposits of the Possession Glaciation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS modified from G. W. Thorsen (written Qls commun., 2004) and Easterbrook (1994) 1 rounded; unsorted; generally loose, unstratified, broken, and chaotic, but may Lower to middle Eocene Crescent Formation basaltic rocks form the basement for the Possession Drift (columnar sections and cross section only)—Glaciomarine This map was produced in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey National locally retain primary bedding structure; may include liquefaction features; Qgp 0–15 ft Qml till (regraded) northeastern Olympic Peninsula and are the oldest rocks exposed in the map area (Tabor and p drift and underlying till; distinguished from equivalent Vashon facies by Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, Agreement Number 04HQAG0069, which partially 15–30 ft Qgt Qb Qc Qd Qf deposited by mass wasting processes other than soil creep and frost heave; Vashon till Qguc w Qf Cady, 1978). They consist mostly of columnar to massive flows with oxidized tops and stratigraphic position. Glaciomarine drift facies variegated; typically clay and silt- supported our mapping project. We thank Gerald W. Thorsen for extensive geologic advice, Qmw typically in unconformable contact with surrounding units. Scarps are shown Qd locally developed paleosols overlain by basaltic cobble to boulder conglomerate. rich diamicton; buff, gray, to dark gray; compact and commonly with vertical site-specific and general expertise, field trips, radiocarbon age data, and review of map and Vashon advance Qml Qguc where supported by lidar (light distance and ranging, based on airborne laser ~35 ft Qga outwash sand Qgo Qgt Qb The rocks of the Crescent Formation are overlain by an unnamed sandstone and siltstone desiccation cracks and shells; locally indistinguishable from till.
    [Show full text]
  • ADMIRALTY INLET Geographic Response Plan (AI-GRP)
    Northwest Area Committee JUNE 2017 ADMIRALTY INLET Geographic Response Plan (AI-GRP) ADMIRALTY INLET GRP JUNE 2017 ADMIRALTY INLET Geographic Response Plan (AI-GRP) June 2017 2 ADMIRALTY INLET GRP JUNE 2017 Spill Response Contact Sheet Required Notifications for Oil Spills & Hazardous Substance Releases Federal Notification - National Response Center (800) 424-8802* State Notification - Washington Emergency Management Division (800) 258-5990* - Other Contact Numbers - U.S. Coast Guard Washington State Sector Puget Sound (206) 217-6200 Dept Archaeology & Historic Preservation (360) 586-3065 - Emergency / Watchstander (206) 217-6001* Dept of Ecology - Command Center (206) 217-6002* - Headquarters (Lacey) (360) 407-6000 - Incident Management (206) 217-6214 - Southwest Regional Office (Lacey) (360) 407-6300 13th Coast Guard District (800) 982-8813 Dept of Fish and Wildlife (360) 902-2200 National Strike Force (252) 331-6000 - Emergency HPA Assistance (360) 902-2537* - Pacific Strike Team (415) 883-3311 - Oil Spill Team (360) 534-8233* Dept of Health (800) 525-0127 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Drinking Water (800) 521-0323 Region 10 – Spill Response (206) 553-1263* - Shellfish Growing Areas (360) 789-8962 - Washington Ops Office (360) 753-9437 Dept of Natural Resources (360) 902-1064 - RCRA / CERCLA Hotline (800) 424-9346 - After normal business hours (360) 556-3921 - Public Affairs (206) 553-1203 Dept of Transportation (360) 705-7000 State Parks & Recreation Commission (360) 902-8613 National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration State Patrol - District 8 (360) 473-0300 Scientific Support Coordinator (206) 526-6829 (NWS Seattle) (206) 526-0110 Weather Tribal Contacts Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe (360) 297-2646 Other Federal Agencies U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Point Wilson Conservation Project Fort Worden Beach Point Wilson Restoration Workgroup September 2016
    Example Application RAC Point Wilson Conservation Project Fort Worden Beach Point Wilson Restoration Workgroup September 2016 Olympic Peninsula Chapter, Washington Native Plant Society Primary Contact: name, phone, email Address: xxxxxxx Additional applicant: name, phone, email Address: xxxxxxx On behalf of the Olympic Chapter of the Washington Native Plant Society, we are requesting funds to fence a conservation site on the Point Wilson Strand in Fort Worden State Park. The fencing will protect the delicate coastal native plant community that is unique to the harsh sandy conditions on the strand and thereby support the mission of the Washington Native Plant Society by conserving native plant habitat. The conservation land is located on public land that can be accessed for viewing and study by Washington residents and visitors. There are few protected places in Puget Sound that have large areas of sandy coastal beaches with as richly diverse native flora as Point Wilson, within Fort Worden State Park. It was recognized as a special treasure by the late Olympic Peninsula botanical researcher Nelsa Buckingham, in the eighties and early nineties. Unfortunately, the average park visitor is unaware of the delightful native plant community they inadvertently trod upon while crossing the delicate strand environment to Fort Worden’s stunning beaches. The steadily increasing beach traffic at Fort Worden significantly impacted the beach plant community. Consequently, in 2006 a group of WNPS Olympic Peninsula Chapter members formed the “Point Wilson Restoration Workgroup”. That year, The Friends of Fort Worden ($1500) and the Washington Native Plant Society ($500 conservation grant matched by $500 from our Olympic chapter) generously gave us startup money to create temporary signs and build barriers to close trails, directing traffic to open trails.
    [Show full text]
  • GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER Jefferson County, Washington
    Jefferson County, Washington Volume 29, Issue 1 Jan.-Apr., 2013 GENEALOGICAL S OCIETY N EWSLETTER INSIDE THIS ISSUE: L INDESNES L IGHTHOUSE - C OMING H OME Lindesnes Lighthouse 1,3,9 From the President 2 By Pam Wilson Don’t Miss It 4 Over 30 years ago I never dreamed I would travel to Calendar of Events 5 Lindesnes Lighthouse in Norway where my great - great- grandfather Olaus Blekum was lighthouse Discussion Groups 6 keeper. Built in 1655, the site is the oldest light- New Books in Library 7 house station in Norway. The light originally used candles to warn ships at sea. Two coal fires, in Jefferson Co. History 8 open grates placed directly on the ground, were lit Jefferson Co. Research 10 on Feb 1, 1725. In 1822 it was fitted with a coal lamp and in 1854 the current Fresnel lens was in- Book Review 11 stalled. The old coal fire lantern from 1822 and its JCGS Annual Seminar 12 foundation have been preserved and sit slightly above the new light which was built in 1915. Today the lighthouse is a National Heritage Site, and the original lighthouse keeper cottages are still in use. The offices and museum are housed in the head lighthouse keeper’s cottage (where Olaus and his family lived) and half of the second cottage is used by the keeper and half is rented to guests. There is a visitor center, gift shop and a quaint café where you can buy Norwegian Waffles served with jam. I began my genealogy research in 1974 and bought the first edition of Fam- ily Tree Maker when it was released.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRING '04 Sos Imp
    PORT TOWNSEND MARINE SCIENCE SOCIETY Nonprofit Org. FORT WORDEN STATE PARK U.S. Postage 532 BATTERY WAY PAID PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 98383 Permit No. 111 OCTOPRESS VOL. XXII NO. 2 RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED SPRING ‘04 Art by Suzanne Stryke P O R T T O W N S E N D M A R I N E S C I E N C E C E N T E R • F O R T W O R D E N S T A T E P A R K Remarkable Residents the vicinity, and can be seen renovating their huge By Alison Capener nest, commonly a mid-January to late PTMSC Home Crew Volunteer February activity. This is also the time Let’s get acquainted with a pair to witness their awesomely beauti- of nesting birds not always ful “pas de deux” as they soar associated with a marine en- together above the cliffs and vironment. But there’s no forest! Last year, Mom Eagle question that this pair de- began incubating eggs, tucked pends mightily on its catch firmly down into the nest, on from these environs, be it February 28th. She’s been Art by Suzanne Stryke fish (preferably salmon), or documented previously as be- marine birds such as ducks or ginning this daunting activity gulls, or leftovers from the fish- from the end of February to the sec- cleaning (heads, guts, etc.) of local ond week in March. She rarely leaves sport fishers. the nest at this time and Dad Eagle hunts for two, bringing her food to the nest.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting Dispute Major Points
    HUNTING DISPUTE BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND HIGHLIGHTS FROM EXPERT REPORTS • Letting the Klallam Tribes hunt in the QTA Tribes’ ceded area despite two consecutive WDFW conclusions that the Klallam Tribes produced no evidence of having treaty hunting rights there is a blatant violation of Buchanan, WDFW’s co-management responsibilities, and the Treaty of Olympia tribes’ (Quileute, Quinault, and Hoh) treaty rights. • Under State v. Buchanan, 138 Wn.2d 186 (1999), a tribe asserting hunting rights outside its ceded area must show “actual use and occupancy over an extended period of time” in the subject area at and before treaty times for the purpose of hunting. Id. at 204-07 (emphasis added). Where a tribe claims that it has hunting rights in another tribe’s ceded area, the petitioning tribe has to show that it “jointly or amicably hunted in the same area to the exclusion of others.” Id. at 205. • Revisiting the criteria for these claims will not and cannot end in a different result for the Klallam Tribes. o WDFW’s expert reiterated numerous times in two consecutive reports that the Klallam Tribes had “provide[d] no actual evidence for hunting” in the Quileute, Quinault, and Hoh ceded area at treaty time. o It is not possible for WDFW to satisfy the standard from State v. Buchanan and devise new traditional use criteria that would award a tribe hunting rights outside its ceded area where the tribe “provides no actual evidence for hunting” in the subject areas. • To prove traditional use rights, the Klallam Tribes have to show they actually used and occupied the areas for hunting jointly or amicably with the QTA Tribes for an extended period of time at and before treaty times.
    [Show full text]