<<

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS

POLICY STATEMENT Organizational Principles to Guide and Define the System and/or Improve the Health of All Children

Committee on Care and Section on

Pediatric and Transplantation

ABSTRACT. Pediatric organ donation and organ trans- and procedures to address each group’s unique plantation can have a significant life-extending benefit to needs. the young recipients of these organs and a high emo- is one of the most resource- tional impact on donor and recipient . Pediatri- intensive and expensive available to chil- cians should become better acquainted with evolving dren. For children, the costs are higher because of a national strategies involving organ procurement and or- longer expected lifespan after transplantation and gan transplantation to help acquaint families with the benefits of organ donation and to help shape public loss of work for or guardians. Despite these policies that will aid in efforts to provide a system of increased costs, the significant benefits of organ and procurement, distribution, and finance that is fair and tissue transplantation should outweigh financial equitable to children and adults. Major issues of concern concerns. are availability and access; oversight and control; pediat- ric medical and surgical consultation throughout the or- gan donation and transplantation process; ethical, social, ORGAN DONATION AND TRANSPLANTATION financial, and follow-up issues; insurance coverage is- The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) sup- sues; and public awareness of the need for organ donors ports the role of OPOs by recommending that all of all ages. potential donor families be approached in a system- atic method by individuals trained in the psycho- ABBREVIATIONS. OPO, organ procurement organization; AAP, logic, social, and medical aspects of organ donation. American Academy of Pediatrics. It has been shown that the rate of families consenting to donate can be increased from the past national BACKGROUND average of 40% to approximately 70% by using hos- he Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 19861 re- pital or OPO staff who are specifically trained in quires that all participating in Medi- organ procurement and by decoupling the death no- Tcare and Medicaid programs refer all potential tification and organ consent processes.5 These pro- organ donors to their local organ procurement orga- cesses should be handled in consultation with the nization (OPO). It further mandates that all families child’s . In addition, an aggressive ap- of potential organ donors become aware of their proach to the medical management of the potential option to donate. In addition, legislation further re- donor will help limit the number of medical failures quires all hospitals to discuss organ donation with of potentially procured organs.5 families of deceased patients. Even with these man- The medical and forensic investigation of the dates, organ availability remains limited. The num- death of a child attributable to trauma (unintentional ber of individuals who are on the national transplant or resulting from abuse), sudden death syn- waiting list remains far in excess of the number of drome, poisonings, etc, presents unique issues re- organs procured.2 Children from birth to 17 years of lated to organ procurement. Close cooperation be- age account for approximately 3% of the waiting list. tween the forensic system, transplant team, treating Debates are ongoing as to the best ways to manage , and OPO allows cooperative evaluation the existing supply of organs and how to improve and guidance and successful organ procurement in organ procurement in general.3 allocation most cases. Cooperation ensures that evidence will policies of the United Network for Organ Sharing not be destroyed and that any injuries noted during give additional points to children on the kidney the organ harvest procedure will be documented and transplant waiting list. Furthermore, the Children’s reported. Some medical examiners believe that indi- Health Act,4 which was passed in October 2000, viduals who died as a result of abuse should not be called on the Organ Procurement and Transplant organ donors. However, if protocols are developed Network to address the different needs of children through which the historical data, surgical and au- and adults by developing specific criteria, policies, topsy findings, and laboratory studies are coopera- tively examined, most individuals whose death re- quires investigation can be donors.6–8 PEDIATRICS (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright © 2002 by the American Acad- The AAP supports the key role of OPO profession- emy of Pediatrics. als to provide support during the donation

982 PEDIATRICS Vol. 109Downloaded No. 5 May from 2002 www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 1, 2021 process and in long-term follow-up of the donor may apply to just one procedure or to all procedures family. The local success of these efforts is an integral and treatments combined. The ongoing cost of trans- part of increasing organ donation within the local plantation plus ongoing long-term care may exceed community. In addition to OPOs, the broader med- the cap. Improved long-term survival in younger ical community must also provide support to the transplant recipients places them at high risk for donor family. This includes nurses, clergy, pediatri- reaching this cap. Medicaid rules vary from state to cians and family physicians, child life specialists, and state, but most transplant procedures are now in- social workers. Involvement of the child’s primary cluded. Because publicly funded programs such as care physician and treating subspecialist during or- Medicaid, the State Children’s Health Insurance Pro- gan procurement and transplantation can be very gram, TRICARE (formerly the Civilian Health Med- beneficial in bedside management, discussion of ical Program of the Uniformed Services), and others complex or unusual diseases, and interaction with are insurers of a large segment of the pediatric pop- the donor family. Education of the pe- ulation, transplantation financial issues must be ad- diatrician and other health care providers about ap- dressed by state and federally funded health care proaching the emotional and physical health of the programs. donor’s family can be provided by the OPOs. Each local medical community must evaluate its resources PUBLIC AWARENESS and have procedures in place to support the family Because the death of a child is often not foreseen, after the death of a loved one and specifically after many families have not considered the possibility of the death of a child. The is an organ donation. Pediatricians, children’s advocacy integral part of the care of the family and should be groups, and institutions that care for children need to involved in support and follow-up of the donor fam- increase awareness of the need for organs with the ily. In addition to family support, the staff at the local same zeal with which blood donations and immuni- medical center should also receive training in dealing zation programs are promoted, through the use of with the death of a child, including confidentiality posters in waiting rooms, handouts, and other public and religious, cultural, and ethical issues. An ethics campaigns. Options also exist for the promotion of committee can also be useful in the development of living donation and bone marrow transplantation. staff support and for discussion of difficult individ- An opportunity to discuss these options within the ual cases.9,10 context of anticipatory guidance during adolescent Some unique considerations for the medical team visits might arise when reviewing the risks of driv- caring for the pediatric organ recipient include sup- ing.12 This interaction would better prepare the ad- port (emotional and spiritual) for the recipient, other olescent for future decisions that he or she may have siblings (eg, social aspects relating to their care), and to make regarding family members and serve to parents or guardians (eg, maintaining employment educate the parents of their own organ donation status); and the availability of pediatric options at the same time. support (critical care, dialysis, , interven- tional , etc). Pediatric transplant programs RECOMMENDATIONS are smaller than adult programs, because fewer chil- 1. Awareness of the need for increased organ dona- dren require transplantation, yet they offer special tion and support for regional transplant programs expertise in children’s health care (eg, critical care, should be promoted by the AAP at the local, dialysis, and ). Children are regional, and national level and by pediatricians. much harder to relocate for medical care, because 2. The treating physician should continue to be in- their families must accompany them and siblings volved in cooperative medical decision-making must be cared for at the same time. Involvement of and support of the family after the determination the child’s primary care physician and local subspe- of brain death in the patient who had been await- cialist can be beneficial in providing the more routine ing organ donation. follow-up visits and laboratory . This de- 3. The procedure for consent for organ donation creases transportation costs and improves patient should be handled by a trained professional, and access to medical intervention. The impact on the the death notification and consent for organ do- entire family must be taken into account, because the nation processes should be decoupled. outcome for the child will be maximized if the family 4. Protocols should be developed that allow cooper- unit remains intact. ative examination of evidence and injuries so that organ donation can successfully proceed in cases FINANCIAL ISSUES in which forensic investigation is required. The cost of organ donation is born entirely by the 5. The US Department of Health and Human Ser- recipient. Payment for an organ transplantation and vices and the medical community must look subsequent follow-up care may be covered by em- closely at all transplant and organ donation regu- ployer and individual insurance policies.11 However, lations and work to ensure that children are fairly the coverage of types of transplants, second trans- served by their policies. plants, and long-term care is variable, and most pol- 6. An organ distribution system should recognize icies have a lifetime maximum amount or “cap.”11 the following: Once this amount has been reached, the insurance a. Health care for children needing transplanta- company has no obligation to pay any additional tion is best provided by a health care system benefits. The amount of the cap varies greatly and that provides specialized children’s medical

Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news byAMERICAN guest on October ACADEMY 1, 2021 OF PEDIATRICS 983 care delivered by pediatricians, pediatric sub- Richard Andrassy, MD specialists, and surgical specialists with pediat- Donna Caniano, MD ric expertise. Michael D. Klein, MD b. Issues related to relocation of the child and Kurt D. Newman, MD family for care, transportation, and family sup- Thomas R. Weber, MD port must be addressed at all centers providing Consultant transplantations for children. Ann M. Kosloske, MD, Immediate Past 7. Education of staff should include medical, ethical, Chairperson social, cultural, and religious issues related to the Staff potential donor and recipient families. Chelsea Kirk 8. Programs for support of donor families should be in place and should be coordinated with the *Lead author child’s primary care physician. 9. Adequate financial resources and payment for REFERENCES pediatric organ transplantation and lifetime fol- 1. Omnibus Reconciliation Act. Pub L No. 99–509 (1986) low-up care must be available. 2. United Network for Organ Sharing. Organ Procurement and Transplan- tation Network (OPTN) waiting list at year end—1990 to 1999. Avail- Committee on Hospital Care, 2001–2002 able at: http://www.unos.org/data/anrpt00/ar00_table 08_01_all.htm. John M. Neff, MD, Chairperson Accessed June 18, 2001 3. Caplan AL. Fairness in organ transplantation. Pediatr Ethicscope. 1999; Jerrold M. Eichner, MD 10:1–8 *David R. Hardy, MD 4. Children’s Health Act. Pub L No. 106–310 (2000) Jack M. Percelay, MD, MPH 5. Razek T, Olthoff K, Reilly PM. Issues in potential organ donor manage- Ted Sigrest, MD ment. Surg Clin North Am. 2000;80:1021–1032 Erin R. Stucky, MD 6. Vernon DD, Setzer NA, Rogers MC. Brain death in children. In: Rogers MC, Helfaer MA, eds. Handbook of Pediatric Intensive Care. 2nd ed. Liaisons Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1995:392–401 Timothy E. Corden, MD 7. Graham M. The role of the medical examiner in fatal : organ Hospital Accreditation Professional and Technical and tissue transplantation issues. In: Monteleone JA, Brodeur AE, eds. Advisory Committee Child Maltreatment: A Clinical Guide and Reference. St Louis, MO: GW Susan Dull, RN, MSN, MBA Medical Publishing Inc; 1994:453–454 National Association of Children’s Hospitals and 8. Kirschner RH, Wilson HL. Fatal child abuse—the pathologist’s perspec- Related Institutions tive. In: Reece RM, ed. Child Abuse: and Management. Mary T. Perkins, RN, DNSc Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger; 1994:325–357 9. Wagner JT, Higdon TL. Spiritual issues and bioethics in the intensive American Hospital Association care unit: the role of the chaplain. Crit Care Clin. 1996;12:15–27 Jerriann M. Wilson, CCLS, MEd 10. Arnold RM, Siminoff LA, Frader JE. Ethical issues in organ Child Life Council procurement: a review for intensivists. Crit Care Clin. 1996;12:29–48 Consultants 11. United Network for Organ Sharing. Transplant 101. Financing your transplant: insurance. Available at: http://www.patients.unos.org/ Michael D. Klein, MD 101࿝finance.htm. Accessed June 18, 2001 Mary O’Connor, MD, MPH 12. Hart C. Early education can smooth path for organ donor family. AAP Elizabeth J. Ostric News. 2000;17:112 Theodore Striker, MD Staff Stephanie M. Mucha, MPH All policy statements from the American Academy of Section on Surgery, 2001–2002 Pediatrics automatically expire 5 years after publication unless Richard Azizkhan, MD, Chairperson reaffirmed, revised, or retired at or before that time.

984 PEDIATRIC ORGANDownloaded DONATION from ANDwww.aappublications.org/news TRANSPLANTATION by guest on October 1, 2021 Pediatric Organ Donation and Transplantation Committee on Hospital Care and Section on Surgery Pediatrics 2002;109;982

Updated Information & including high resolution figures, can be found at: Services http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/109/5/982 References This article cites 5 articles, 1 of which you can access for free at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/109/5/982#BIBL Subspecialty Collections This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the following collection(s): Emergency http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/emergency_medicine_ sub Transport Medicine http://www.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/transport_medicine_su b Permissions & Licensing Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or in its entirety can be found online at: http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtml Reprints Information about ordering reprints can be found online: http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml

Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 1, 2021 Pediatric Organ Donation and Transplantation Committee on Hospital Care and Section on Surgery Pediatrics 2002;109;982

The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/109/5/982

Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 345 Park Avenue, Itasca, Illinois, 60143. Copyright © 2002 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 1073-0397.

Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 1, 2021