University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1974 Watergate, Impeachment, and the Constitution Philip B. Kurland Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Philip B. Kurland, "Watergate, Impeachment, and the Constitution," 45 Mississippi Law Journal 531 (1974). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. WATERGATE, IMPEACHMENT, AND THE CONSTITUTION* I have little confidence in my own infallibility, and as little in the infallibility of others. Sir Robert Peel I. INTRODUCTION Scandals in the United States, and not least political scandals, have usually been short-term affairs. In most such instances, the press publishes the charges of wrongdoing with its accustomed fervent, often noisome, self-righteousness. Usually, the accused is quickly condemned by the public, often removed from office and soon forgotten, as with Sherman Adams, or Abe Fortas, or Spiro Agnew, or left to the long- drawn processes of the criminal law, as with Bobby Baker or Otto Ker- ner. In the latter event, the press coverage is ordinarily intense and titillating during the period of the trial, but the case is soon beyond the interest of the American public. Seldom do the hot political cases in- volve more than the pecadilloes of a single, temporarily high-placed official; seldom do the cases present basic problems of a constitutional nature.