Démocratie Contre Capitalisme En Grèce Contemporaine: La Bataille Perdue De Syriza Contre L'austérité

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Démocratie Contre Capitalisme En Grèce Contemporaine: La Bataille Perdue De Syriza Contre L'austérité UNIVERSITÉ·DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL DÉMOCRATIE CONTRE CAPITALISME EN GRÈCE CONTEMPORAINE: LA BATAILLE PERDUE DE SYRIZA CONTRE L'AUSTÉRITÉ MÉMOIRE PRÉSENTÉ COMME EXIGENCE PARTIELLE DE LA MAÎTRISE EN SCIENCE POLITIQUE PAR ALEXANDRE LEMAY -ROCHE DÉCEMBRE 2018 UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL Service des bibliothèques Avertissement La diffusion de ce mémoire se fait dans le respect des droits de son auteur, qui a signé le formulaire Autorisation de reproduire et de diffuser un travail de recherche de cycles supérieurs (SDU-522 - Rév.1 0-2015). Cette autorisation stipule que «conformément à l'article 11 du Règlement no 8 des études de cycles supérieurs, [l'auteur] concède à l'Université du Québec à Montréal une licence non exclusive d'utilisation et de publication de la totalité ou d'une partie importante de [son] travail de recherche pour des fins pédagogiques et non commerciales. Plus précisément, [l'auteur] autorise l'Université du Québec à Montréal à reproduire, diffuser, prêter, distribuer ou vendre des copies de [son] travail de recherche à des fins non commerciales sur quelque support que ce soit, y compris l'Internet. Cette licence et cette autorisation n'entraînent pas une renonciation de [la] part [de l'auteur] à [ses] droits moraux ni à [ses] droits de propriété intellectuelle. Sauf entente contraire, [l'auteur] conserve la liberté de diffuser et de commercialiser ou non ce travail dont [il] possède un exemplaire.» REMERCIEMENTS Rédiger mon mémoire n'a pas été une mince affaire. Heureusement, j'ai pu compter sur mon entourage pour rn' aider à mettre un pied devant 1' autre. Merci à mon directeur Xavier Lafrance, qui a marqué mon cheminement intellectuel et a réussi à me garder stimulé en m'incluant dans ses propres travaux de recherche dès la fin de mon bac. Ses conseils généreux à chaque étape de la rédaction ont été essentiels pour mener ce projet à terme. Merci à mes parents pour leur soutien indéfectible dans tout ce que j'entreprends. Merci à mes amis pour leur écoute et pour leur capacité à réduire mon anxiété à zéro le temps d'une soirée. Merci en particulier à Thomas Laberge et à Xavier St-Gelais, camarades à la maîtrise, avec qui j'ai partagé les mêmes doutes et appréhensions, le plus souvent autour d'un bon eurogame ou d'un 2v2 sur Black Forest. Merci aussi au monde du CÉDIM pour m'avoir accueilli dans ce grand bureau (avec fenêtres!) et pour avoir rendu ce travail bien plus agréable par leur compagnie. Salut à Laura, Marion, Michael, Noémie, Nour et Olivier. Merci surtout à ma compagne Geneviève Lavoie, pour sa patience et sa douceur. Ta présence à mes côtés pendant les épisodes difficiles était inestimable, mais je retiens surtout les moments de légèreté et d'évasion (quelque part dans le Barranco de Poqueira!). Je tiens également à souligner l'appui financier du CRSH et du FRQSC, qui a facilité énormément ce travail. Elections cannat be allowed to change economie policy. Wolfgang Schauble, réunion de 1'Eurogroupe du 11 février 2015 à Bruxelles. TABLE DES MATIÈRES REMERCIEMENTS .................................................................................................... iii RÉSUMÉ ................................................................................................................... viii INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 a. Revue de la documentation ............................................................................. 2 SYRIZA comme parti de gauche radicale .................................................. 2 S YRIZA au pouvoir ................................................................................... 5 b. Problématique ................................................................................................. 9 c. Méthodologie ......................................................................................................... 18 CHAPITRE! CADRE D'ANALYSE : CAPITALISME CONTRE DÉMOCRATIE ..................... 21 1.1 « Crise de la démocratie » - quelle crise ? Perspective marxiste sur la démocratie capitaliste ................................................................................. 21 1.1.1 Une crise accidentelle, ou structurelle ?.......................................... 22 1.1.2 Le capitalisme ................................................................................. 26 1.1.3 La séparation de l'« économique » et du « politique » dans le capitalisme ......................................... ·............................................. 31 1.1.4 L'État dans la société capitaliste ..................................................... 36 1.2 Austérité contre démocratie en Europe ........................................................ 47 1.2.1 La résurgence du pouvoir patronal. ................................................. 4 7 1.2.2 Verrouiller les politiques néolibérales -l'avènement d'un « néo-constitutionnalisme »............................................................ 51 1.2.3 De « néo-constitutionnalisme » à « constitutionnalisme autoritaire » ..................................................................................... 53 1.3 Synthèse ....................................................................................................... 58 vi CHAPITRE II SYRIZA EN CONTEXTE: AUSTÉRITÉ ET RÉSISTANCE DANS LA GRÈCE RONGÉE PAR LA CRISE ......................................................................................... 61 2.1 Grèce 2009-2015 : crises économique, sociale et démocratique ................. 62 2.1.1 La catastrophe grecque .................................................................... 62 2.1.2 D'une crise de légitimité à une crise de la démocratie .................... 68 2.2 Résistances: de l'occupation des places à la montée de SYRIZA .............. 72 2.2.1 Mobilisations anti-austérité ............................................................. 73 2.2.2 Élections 2012 à 2015 :séismes politiques ..................................... 79 2.3 Synaspism6s Rizospastikis Aristeras: «Coalition de la gauche radicale» 82 2.3.1 Origine ............................................................................................. 82 2.3.2 La gauche radicale ........................................................................... 83 2.3.3 Un parti mouvementiste .................................................................. 87 2.3.4 Prendre le pouvoir: de coalition électorale à parti ........................... 90 CHAPITRE III LA GAUCHE RADICALE AU POUVOIR : PREMIER MANDAT DE SYRIZA (JANVIER-AOÛT 2015) ............................................................................................ 96 3.1 Janvier-février : victoire électorale et début des négociations .................... 99 3.1.1 Mise en place ................................................................................... 99 3.1.2 La ligne de Tsipras-Varoufakis ..................................................... 103 3.1.3 Négociations pour l'extension du plan: vers l'accord du 20 février ....................................................................................... 105 3.1.4 Bilan des première semaines ......................................................... 112 3.2 Mars-juin : les négociations en vue d'un nouvel accord ........................... 113 3.2.1 Contexte ........... :............................................................................ 113 3.2.2 Déroulement des négociations ...................................................... 115 3.2.3 Bilan (mars-juin) ........................................................................... 126 3.3 Juillet-août : combativité et défaite ............................................................ 130 3.3.1 Le référendum ............................................................................... 130 3.3.2 La capitulation ............................................................................... 134 VIl 3.4 Analyse d'un échec .................................................................................... 137 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................... 144 a. Critiquer la stratégie du gouvernement SYRIZA ...................................... 149 ANNEXE A EXTRAITS DU PROGRAMME DE THESSALONIQUE ...................................... 159 ANNEXEB L'ACCORD DU 13 JUILLET 2015 ......................................................................... 167 BIBLIOGRAPHIE .................................................................................................... 172 RÉSUMÉ À l'été 2015, au terme d'une bataille de cinq mois contre les créanciers de la Grèce, le gouvernement formé par le parti de gauche radicale S YRIZA a abandonné son programme politique sous le poids de la contrainte, adoptant un nouveau plan d'austérité pourtant rejeté par la population. Dans ce mémoire, nous avons cherché à penser cet échec à partir d'un questionnement sur les rapports entre capitalisme et démocratie. Afin de mieux comprendre les pressions qui ont ultimement fait plier le gouvernement SYRIZA, malgré son mandat démocratique fort, nous avons réalisé une étude de cas portant sur le premier mandat d'Alexis Tsipras Ganvier à août 2015). Nous présentons d'abord les théories sur la « crise » de la démocratie ainsi que les théories marxistes de l'État et de la démocratie pour développer un cadre théorique qui oriente 1' analyse. Les événements de 2015 en Grèce sont ensuite remis dans leur contexte avant d'être examinés étroitement,
Recommended publications
  • Michael Mcdermott
    LANDSCAPES AND THE MACHINE: ADDRESSING WICKED VALUATION PROBLEMS WHEN NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST MEET A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree Doctor of Philosophy by Michael McDermott Faculty of Design, Architecture and Building University of Technology, Sydney Supervisors: Associate Professor Jason Prior and Professor Spike Boydell 2015 Landscapes and the Machine: Addressing Wicked Valuation Problems when North, South, East and West Meet. i ABSTRACT This thesis is about engaging with the dynamic relationship between “landscapes”, “land tenure”, and the “machine”. The first term can be so broad as to mean every process and thing encountered, the second means the way that land is held by a person or group of persons, and the third means things both put together and used by humans to fulfil their wants and needs from the landscape. As a professional valuer I have been traditionally trained to engage at arms-length with the normative behaviour of persons or groups at the intersection of these three concepts, wherein those people and groups were willing but not compelled to engage. Such traditional valuation approaches are increasingly recognised as being insufficient to address wicked valuation problems of the diverse peoples and groups that inhabit the globe from North, South, East to West. This thesis develops a means of engaging with these wicked valuation problems in a suitably knowledgeable and prudent way. To do so the thesis adopts an exploratory approach guided by Whitehead’s process philosophy injunction of a creative advance into novelty. This approach is enacted through a range of data collection and analysis methods.
    [Show full text]
  • 4273 Mechanisms of Policy Change Inside International
    Angelos Angelou LSE| European Institute Word count: 4,273 Mechanisms of policy change inside International Organizations during times of crisis: Evidence from the cooperation of the Troika institutions vis-à-vis the handling of the Greek debt Abstract This note will establish that the observed mechanisms of policy change inside the EC and the ECB vis-à-vis the handling of the Greek debt disconfirm certain central theoretical expectations of the policy change literature. By juxtaposing the most basic theoretical insights of the policy change research with a new dataset that describes the interactions of the Troika institutions regarding the handling of the Greek debt we will establish that the mode of change inside the two European institutions was unexpected and puzzling from a theoretical point of view. The study of such a failed most-likely case will provide detailed insights regarding the processes of change inside IOs during times of crisis and will allow us to modify the respective hypotheses of the policy change literature. Introduction The Eurozone bailouts have been a matter of extensive academic and political discussion. One of the less examined aspects of the crisis is the cooperation between the three organizations that undertook the drafting and the daily management of the programs. The International Monetary Fund (IMF), the European Commission (EC) and the European Central Bank (ECB), created an ad hoc body, the Troika that operated as the directorate and the meditator via which the debtors coordinated with their creditors. This note will use one of the numerous disagreements that arose during this cooperation in order to study the process of policy change inside the three Troika bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Benoît Cœuré, November 2016 1
    Calendar of Benoît Cœuré Member of the ECB's Executive Board November 2016 Meeting / Event Date (incl. topic / meeting participants, as applicable) Location Tuesday, 1 November Meeting with HSBC, on global economic and financial Frankfurt developments Wednesday, 2 November Banking Industry Dialogue ECB Meeting with high-level independent evaluator of past ECB European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and European Stability Mechanism (ESM) financial assistance programmes, Ms Gertrude Tumpel-Gugerell, on ex post evaluation of EFSF and ESM programmes Governing Council ECB Thursday, 3 November Meeting with Morgan Stanley, on developments in the ECB European Union Europe on Credit Series, organised by Harvard Universityʼs Cambridge, Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies – keynote MA address on “Sovereign debt in the euro area: too safe or too risky?” Friday, 4 November Meeting with Harvard University, on research on monetary Cambridge, policy and financial regulation MA Sunday, 6 November Meeting with US Federal Reserve System, Ms Janet Basel Yellen, and Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Mr William C. Dudley, on global economic and financial developments Monday, 7 November Bank for International Settlements (BIS) – bi-monthly Basel meetings Eurogroup Brussels Tuesday, 8 November Executive Board ECB Meeting with Mr Vivien Lévy-Garboua, on a project for the ECB French Treasury on post-trade activities in Europe Calendar of Benoît Cœuré, November 2016 1 Meeting with media Frankfurt Wednesday, 9 November Meeting with media Lyons Les
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Dialogue with Greece
    IPOL DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES EGOV ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE SUPPORT UNIT I N-D EPT H ANALYSIS Economic Dialogue with Greece ECON on 2 March 2016 This note presents selected information on the current status of the EU economic governance procedures and related relevant information in view of an Economic Dialogue with Mr Euclid Tsakalotos, Minister of Finance of the Hellenic Republic, in accordance with the EU legal framework, in particular Article 2a of EU Regulation 1467 as amended by Regulation 1177/2011 and Article 7(10) of EU Regulation 472/2013.This briefing is an update on a previous briefing on Greece’s Financial Assistance Programme. 1. Latest economic developments After returning to growth in 2014 and showing unexpected resilience during the first half of 2015, Greece's economy has slipped back into recession in the second half of 2015 reflecting sharp deterioration in confidence, renewed stress within the banking system (which led to imposition of capital controls1 in June 2015) and uncertainty stemming from prolonged negotiations in the context of Greece programme review(s). According to Eurostat's preliminary data, the Greek economy contracted by 1.4% q-o-q in Q3 2015 and 0.6% q-o-q in Q4 2015. If confirmed, this data would bring real GDP contraction to 0.7% for 2015 as a whole (as compared to a 0.0% real GDP growth expected by the European Commission (COM) in the winter 2016 forecast2). Looking ahead, negative carryover effects from 2015 are to weigh on output dynamics in 2016 (-0.7%) before a progressive rebound in confidence, along the 'expected easing of capital controls and compliance with the conditionality of the new ESM assistance programme', helps the Greek economy to return to growth in 2017 (+2.7 %).
    [Show full text]
  • Political Economy – a Theoretical and Methodological Framework for Identifying Main Trends in Social Entrepreneurship Development
    SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.4.58.15 UDC 330.354, LBC 65.053 © Pavlov R.N. Political Economy – a Theoretical and Methodological Framework for Identifying Main Trends in Social Entrepreneurship Development Ruslan N. Pavlov Central Economic and Mathematical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences 47, Nakhimovsky Avenue, Moscow, 117418, Russian Federation Е-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The paper discusses some features of the source of social entrepreneurship as a new form of business organization, aimed at implementing social objectives in the context of strengthening neoliberal trends in economic policy and economic theory, rather than at maximizing the owners’ profit. It is demonstrated that, remaining within the framework of the neoliberal ideology which retains its influence in the economic science, it is impossible to create an adequate theory explaining the importance of social entrepreneurship in the context of the process of changing paradigms of economic relations, since under the influence of this ideology false stereotypes are established, which is accompanied by falsification of historical facts. In this context it seems that the methodology of political economy, taking into account the current trends in the transformation of socio-economic relations and the deviation of the trend of social development from the framework of the formally preserved, but declining neoliberal paradigm, is very popular, especially since its problem areas include issues such as the distinction between individual and social forms of production, the relations between the necessary and surplus product, the distribution of surplus value (in case of its occurrence), the issues of individualization and socialization of economic phenomena, the correlation between market and non-market production areas and distribution of the final product, the issue of recognizing the social significance of the result of individual labor.
    [Show full text]
  • OECD, "Seminar on Capital Movements Agenda,"
    PROGRAMME SEMINAR ON OPEN AND ORDERLY CAPITAL MOVEMENTS Does global co-operation matter? 25 October 2016, OECD, Paris Organised by the OECD in co-operation with Germany (Federal Ministry of Finance) as the upcoming G20 Presidency Open and orderly capital movements: does global co-operation matter? An open, transparent and orderly global system of capital flows underpins global growth and stability. In light of the increasingly interconnected global economy, faced with episodes of heightened capital flows volatility, significant value is attached to credible commitment mechanisms to rules-based and co-operative approaches to capital flows that send a positive signal of a predictable policy agenda. This type of framework will help countries maintain markets’ confidence and continue to attract the long-term, high-quality capital needed to support inclusive growth and sustainable development. The OECD Code of Liberalisation of Capital Movements (the Code) provides such a framework. As an instrument that encourages co-operation, it has provided a tried and tested process for global dialogue for over 50 years. The Code is used by the 35 OECD countries, including emerging economies, as well as by non-OECD countries. Four non-OECD countries have applied for adherence since it was opened to all in 2012. It is a living instrument adaptable to countries at different levels of development, through built-in flexibility clauses that allow temporary suspension of liberalisation commitments in times of economic and financial disturbance. Over time, Adherents have developed a body of well-established jurisprudence on the implementation of the Code’s rights and obligations and the conformity of individual country measures.
    [Show full text]
  • A Radical Greek Evolution Within the Eurozone
    A radical Greek evolution within the eurozone For John Milios, seen as the most hardline of Alexis Tsipras’s advisers, the country’s humanitarian crisis is the top priority John Milios’s phone rings a lot these days. There are hedge funds and financial institutions and investors, all curious to know what the German-trained professor thinks. As chief economist of Syriza, the far-left party that has sent markets into a tailspin as it edges ever closer to power in Greece, the academic has had a prominent role in devising the group’s financial manifesto. He is the first to concede the programme is radical. “I am a Marxist,” he says. “The majority [in Syriza] are.” Sipping green tea in his favourite Athens cafe, he explains: “Alternative approaches to the economy and society have been excluded by the dominant narrative of neoliberalism.” Milios, who attended Athens College, the country’s most prestigious private school – graduating in the same class as the former prime minister George Papandreou –is part of an eclectic group of experts advising Syriza’s leader, Alexis Tsipras, on the economy. Others include the Oxford-educated Euclid Tsakalotos, the political economist and shipping family heir Giorgos Stathakis, the leftwing veteran Giannis Dragasakis and the Texas-based academic Yanis Varoufakis. If the Athenian parliament fails to elect a new head of state by 29 December, the Greek constitution demands that snap polls are called. The ruling coalition’s narrow majority has made it unlikely that the government’s candidate, Stavros Dimas, will get the presidency. With the radicals in the ascent, Milios and his fellow Marxists are likely to take the reins of the EU’s weakest economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurozone Sovereign Debt Crisis Briefing ...A Briefing on the Status, Causes and Solutions for the Eurozone Sovereign Debt Crisis
    Eurozone Sovereign Debt Crisis Briefing ...a briefing on the status, causes and solutions for the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis October 22, 2012 Eurozone Sovereign Debt Crisis - Current Status The European Central Bank (ECB) at its meeting in Septem- Europe Big-Four 10-year Bond Yields ber finally came to the rescue and offered to directly partici- 7.50% Spain Spain 7.00% pate in a bailout program for struggling countries such as Italy 6.50% Spain. The ECB promised to use its unlimited balance sheet Germany 6.00% to help stabilize the Eurozone debt crisis, taking a big step France forward and succeeding in causing Spanish and Italian bond 5.50% 5.00% yields to drop sharply. There are still many obstacles to over- 4.50% Italy come, but there is finally a sense that there might be a path 4.00% forward in the Eurozone debt crisis without an implosion of 3.50% France the euro or the loss of Eurozone members. 3.00% 2.50% The markets at present are waiting for three major events. 2.00% 1.50% First, the markets are waiting for a deal that provides Greece Germany 1.00% with its next 31 billion euro tranche of bailout aid. Second, 9/10 11/10 1/11 3/11 5/11 7/11 9/11 11/11 1/12 3/12 5/12 7/12 9/12 the markets are waiting for Spain to formally accept the bail- out program offered by the ECB and the Eurozone through its European Stability Mechanism (ESM) permanent bailout in Spain and Greece and protect Italy from contagion.
    [Show full text]
  • View Conference Report
    October 13–14, 2016 Conference Report Introduction: Greece as a Litmus Test for Europe Greece, renowned as the cradle of democracy, stands at a turning remains on life support, and, even with bailout money approved point. Fittingly, as with any commentary on Greece, a brief review of through 2020, it is unclear whether the country will be able to stand history is in order. We need not go too far back in time; 2008 is a good fully on its own by then. place to begin. Each round of bailout negotiations was excruciating: each time In the years since the global financial crash of 2008, the country’s creditors re-examined Greece’s finances, things looked worse. This led name has been synonymous with crisis. Thanks to a variety of factors to a downward spiral of trust and the imposition of ever-stricter within and beyond its control, ranging from fiscal profligacy to conditions on the disbursal of bailout funds. Clearly unable to survive geography, Greece has become the epicenter for a convergence of without those funds—certainly not within the EU—Greece took the crises—economic, political, and demographic—besetting the European money and, grudgingly, the conditions attached to it. The sense of Union as a whole. None of these challenges are unique to Greece, but being dictated to by the EU, plus years of grinding austerity that have they have hit hard there, exposing deeper fault lines in the EU as a followed, have precipitated a political crisis: with business as usual so whole. How Greece and the European Union respond will prove a clearly not working, both apathy and radicalism have increased litmus test for the European project.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Benoît Cœuré, January 2018 1
    Calendar of Benoît Cœuré Member of the ECB’s Executive Board January 2018 Date Meeting / Event (incl. topic / meeting participants, as applicable) Location Sunday, 7 January Bank for International Settlements (BIS) – bi-monthly meetings Basel Monday, 8 January Meeting with German Ministry of Finance, Mr Levin Holle, on Basel regulatory issues Financial Stability Board (FSB) Steering Committee Basel Tuesday, 9 January Executive Board ECB Governing Council ECB ECB farewell dinner for Chair of Board of Governors of US ECB Federal Reserve System, Ms Janet Yellen Thursday, 11 January Eurogroup Working Group Brussels Friday, 12 January Eurogroup Working Group Brussels Bellagio Group meeting ECB Saturday, 13 January Bellagio Group meeting ECB Monday, 15 January Meeting with Hellenic Bank Association (HBA), on Greek banking ECB system Meeting with European Investment Bank (EIB), Mr Andrew ECB McDowell and Ms Debora Revoltella, on prospects for investment in the euro area Tuesday, 16 January Meeting with Graduate Institute of International and Development ECB Studies (Geneva), on digital currencies Executive Board ECB Wednesday, 17 January Meeting with Norges Bank, Mr Jon Nicolaisen, Mr Torbjørn ECB Hægeland and Mr Audun Grønn, on issues of common interest Meeting with media ECB Meeting with Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the ECB Calendar of Benoît Cœuré, January 2018 1 European Union, Deputy Minister of Finance, Ms Marinela Petrova, and Deputy Governor of Българска народна банка (Bulgarian National Bank), Mr Kalin Hristov, on the Presidency’s work programme Meeting with BNP Paribas, on global economic prospects ECB Meeting with Bruegel, on economic situation in the euro area ECB Thursday, 18 January Meeting with French Embassy in Berlin, Mr Etienne Oudot de ECB Dainville, on euro area issues Meeting with Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) of the ECB International Monetary Fund (IMF), Mr Prakash Loungani and Mr Laurence M.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter to WIPO Director General Dr
    Celebrating the 2017 #WorldIPDay Open Letter To WIPO Director General Dr. Francis Gurry We the undersigned are proud to celebrate World IP day with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Intellectual property (IP) rights play a crucial role in growing economies, driving innovation, and saving lives. Robust IP systems provide the greatest incentives for innovators to create the next generation of goods and services, artists to produce original works, and entrepreneurs to enter the marketplace. They also allow for the sharing of knowledge and technological advancement. Invention comes out of the shadows with good intellectual property protections. IP Rights Grow the Economy IP-intensive industries are the cornerstone of modern economies. Between the U.S. and E.U., IP- intensive industries employed between 30%-38% of their workforces—more than 127 million jobs. As a matter of fact, these industries are responsible for generating nearly 40% of the combined US & EU gross domestic products. IP-intensive industries in these economies paid workers 46% higher wages than those employed in comparable jobs in non-IP-intensive industries. Similarly, per capita income in countries with robust property right is 21 times more than per-capita income in countries with weak protections. IP Rights Drive Innovation Human ingenuity is boundless, and IP rights create an environment where human creativity can be unleashed. In 2015, a record 2.9 million new patents were filed worldwide—ranging from groundbreaking technological processes to cures of catastrophic disease to modernizations of everyday conveniences. To thrive, innovation must be protected. Enforcement of IP rights prevent production of counterfeits that undermine economic growth and finance criminal organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • 14:45 Greece's Debt: Where Do We Really Stand? 15:45
    ORGANIZER AMERICAN-HELLENIC UNDER THE AUSPICES OF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ORGANIZER AGENDA DAY ONE ❯ MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2015 12:30 REGISTRATION | WELCOME RECEPTION 13:15 OPENING REMARKS Elias Spirtounias, Executive Director, American-Hellenic Chamber of Commerce WHY A NATIONAL CONSENSUS Simos Anastasopoulos, President, American-Hellenic Chamber of Commerce 13:45 THE ISSUES IN PERSPECTIVE Constantine Michalos, President, Athens Chamber of Commerce and Industry Athanasios Savvakis, President, Federation of Industries of Northern Greece 14:00 THE U.S. VIEWPOINT 14:15 THE GREEK ECONOMY: IS THERE HOPE? Euclid Tsakalotos, Minister of Finance 14:45 GREECE’S DEBT: WHERE DO WE REALLY STAND? Paul Kazarian, Founder, Chairman & CEO, Japonica Partners USA Fragkiskos Koutentakis, President, Public Debt Management Department* Athanassia Xenaki, Alternate President, ELSTAT* Michael Jacobides, Sir Donald Gordon Chair of Enterpreneurship and Innovation, London Business School John A. Moran, Director, EIB & f. Secretary General, Department of Finance, Ireland* George Serafeim, Jakurski Family Associate Professor of Business Administration, Harvard University* 15:45 WHY MEMORANDA? ANALYZING THE BASICS George Chouliarakis, Alternate Minister of Finance* Rasmus Rüffer, Head of Division, Monetary Policy Strategy Division, European Central Bank (ECB) Declan Costello, Mission Chief for Greece, European Commission Nikos Vettas, General Director, Foundation for Economic and Industrial Research (IOBE) and Professor, Athens University of Economics and Business Delia
    [Show full text]