DOCSLIB.ORG

Liza Ward Statement Revised

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Liza Ward Statement Revised 2/14/20 Dear members of the Board of Pardons: It is my hope to be able to make a statement at the hearing for the pardon of Caril Fugate Clair. In the event I may not do so, I respectfully request that the following statement be incorporated into my letter in support for pardon: First, I wish the board to know that while I am able to travel to places my father will never be able to go due to the loss of his parents C. Lauer Ward and Clara Ward at the hand of Charles Starkweather, I come here with my father’s full support. I also come here with the blessing of the nephew and niece of the deceased who completely defend my position in this matter regarding Caril Fugate’s wrongful conviction. What I say here in this room today, I say for them as well. My family’s support and willingness to admit they only knew as much as they’d been told about the deaths of our vanished loved ones, after years of pain and suffering, constitutes an act of faith and suggests a great possibility for redemption. I see this opportunity to pardon Caril Fugate Clair as a chance to right the wrong long-held presumption of guilt concerning a young girl, orphaned herself and under the control of a psychopath wielding three rifles and a knife. This was a boy she had known, dated at the vulnerable age of thirteen, and broken up with. A boy to whom, when she said no, turned on a dime, and blew away her family while she was at school. He claimed her family was still alive somewhere; that their safety depended on her obedience. What choice was left to her other than to believe him? To answer the question as to why a pardon matters after all this time, I feel it is a matter of human decency and integrity. It matters to the family members who remain. It matters to Caril Fugate Clair that her name be cleared of this heinous crime. To give a very old woman the peace she so rightly deserves has become for me, a moral obligation. I feel that it is my duty to speak up for what I have found to be true. The truth is owed as much to the memory of grandparents who were people of deep faith and grace, as it is owed to Caril herself. I’ve spent my life uncovering the facts. I have read every document available to the public. Every line in the thousand pages of her trial transcript. I have visited every crime scene. I have listened to countless stories, and I find myself as yet unable to uncover a single shred of evidence that suggests beyond reasonable doubt that Caril Ann Fugate was guilty. What I have found instead is that she should never should have been charged with a crime—tried as an adult at fourteen with the death penalty on the table. Caril Fugate was not an accomplice in the Starkweather homicides. Not the mastermind. And never a willing participant in any of these murders. That Starkweather himself, a psychopath responsible for eleven deaths, who changed his story at least four times before his conviction--was presented as lead witness for the prosecution is inconceivable. Why was Starkweather given a voice while Fugate’s version of the story was disbelieved? I find this not only unjust and unfair to Caril Fugate, but disrespectful to the victims who were murdered by Starkweather. Why should a mass murder’s version of events prevail in our consciousness? Why are we predisposed to hate her? To judge her by the fact that she didn’t cry at the trial? Or by her tough expression in a photograph? She should’ve been sitting on his knee when he got the chair. She was the mastermind. She had his baby in prison… Guilty as sin. These are all things that have been said to me. I don’t believe the people who said these things are bad or cruel, only misinformed, which in 1958, it was almost impossible not to be. (Many do not know that Caril Fugate was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison merely on the basis that she handled money in a wallet belonging to murder victim Robert Jenson. Nor do they know about the note which was found in her pocket by authorities in Wyoming pleading for help—lost somehow during her extradition to Lincoln. Nor that she was sedated when she signed her extradition papers from Wyoming to Nebraska. Few know that one of the jurors was involved in a wager as to whether she would get the electric chair, which would, at least today, constitute an immediate mistrial. And I don’t know why it matters so much, but a physical examination proved that Caril Fugate had never been sexually intimate with anyone. Caril Fugate was a young girl living in extreme poverty. She had never been as far east as Omaha, never crossed the Missouri River. She spent all her babysitting money on presents for her little sister; was a model prisoner, such that she was trusted with the keys to the gates to let people in and out, conducted tours, and upon parole remained an exemplary citizen all her life.) I am here to implore you to grant Caril Fugate Clair a pardon; to find it in your hearts to step into the shoes of a fourteen year old girl; to see the situation through her eyes, to admit that she would never have been tried or found guilty of a capital offense today. I come here to urge us all to reconsider what we think we would do in her shoes…I can tell you that I have measured myself all my life according to Caril’s steps, and I have to admit that I do not know what I would have done differently. I just do not know. I have a daughter who is five years younger than Caril Fugate when her life took an abrupt turn because of Charles Starkweather. Someday, I will have to tell my daughter this story. I will have to tell her what happened to her great grandparents, and what her beloved Gimpa endured as a child. This is our legacy, this crime-- as it is the unfortunate legacy of many in the State of Nebraska. The trauma is passed down through generations and the ripples still touch us today. Every relative of a victim knows this, and feels it in different ways. The ripples will reach my daughter somehow in some way, if they have not already. But I want to be able to tell her how it all ended; that the board and the world summoned the heart to pardon a woman who was once a child; that the world found the heart and courage to listen to Caril Fugate; to reconsider what they had always believed to be otherwise; to see things differently, and after more than sixty years finally honor the truth according to the girl. Respectfully, Liza Ward .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • III MEMETIC REFRAMING Christian Patterson's Redheaded Peckerwood
    III MEMETIC REFRAMING Christian Patterson’s Redheaded Peckerwood In December 1957, Charles Starkweather and his girlfriend Caril Ann Fugate embarked on a murder spree that shocked the US population. And even today, more than sixty years later, the so-called ‘Starkweather case’ keeps haunting the North American people as part of the country’s collective imagination. This situation is testified to by Christian Patterson’s evolving photobook Redheaded Peckerwood (2011, 2012, 2013),404 which contains a visually diverse selection of photographs, each of which points suggestively to the Starkweather case.405 The historical murder spree is undoubtedly Redheaded Peckerwood’s narrative centre. However, I argue that the criminal case merely serves a reflection on how ‘frames’, which are sets of conventions that govern the representation of historical events, are disseminated in culture.406 That argument, I claim, is conditioned by a memetic principle of rereading that allows the frame to appear multiple times according to the meme’s emergent logic of imitation through variation. ‘Memes’, according to Richard Dawkins’s initial definition of the phenomenon, are units of cultural transmission that propagate themselves in ever-changing form by leaping from brain to brain, often via magazines, computers, movies, and other technological platforms.407 Humans cannot entirely control these processes,408 and I argue that the same might be said of the process of rereading Redheaded Peckerwood, since it is partially governed by algorithms. The smartphone revolution around 2010 introduces the so-called ‘post-digital’ era, that is, the situation wherein humans no longer control the digital realm, since portable digital devices allow for a permanent extension of subjectivity across the Internet.409 Within this contemporary context, I contend that humans are habituated to meeting ambiguity and elusiveness with immediate online searches.
    [Show full text]
  • 3423Am Charles Raymond Starkweather
    NEBRASKA STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTION RECORD Film RG3423.AM: Starkweather, Charles Raymond, 1938-1959 Papers: 1958-1993 Lincoln, Lancaster County, Neb: Criminal Size: 1.0 cu. ft.; 1 roll of microfilm BACKGROUND NOTE Charles R. Starkweather was convicted in the murder of Robert Jensen of Bennet, Nebraska in 1958. Although Starkweather claimed involvement in a total of eleven murders between January 21 and January 29, 1958, he was convicted and sentenced to death for only the first degree murder of Jensen and for murder while in the perpetration of robbery. Starkweather’s girlfriend, Caril Fugate, received a life sentence as an accomplice in the Jensen murder, although she claimed that she was Starkweather’s hostage during the week-long murder spree. Beginning with the murders of Fugate’s mother, stepfather, and infant half-sister, the two allegedly killed seven others in Lancaster County, Nebraska, and one other person during their escape attempt in Wyoming. Starkweather, after numerous appeals and stays of execution, was electrocuted on June 25, 1959. Fugate spent eighteen years in the Women’s Reformatory at York, Nebraska before being paroled in 1976. Upon parole, Fugate was given a new identity and an out- of-state residence. SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE The collection consists of manuscript materials arranged in two series: 1) Research materials for “Murder in the Heartland,” and 2) Newspaper clippings, 1958-1973. The materials relate to the murders committed by Charles Starkweather and Caril Fugate in January, 1958. Series 1 – Research materials for “Murder in the Heartland,” consists entirely of photocopies of research materials compiled for the ABC-TV miniseries, “Murder in the Heartland,” (1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Social Construction of a Nebraska Execution Jeremy Harris Lipschultz University of Nebraska at Omaha, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Communication Faculty Publications School of Communication Winter 1998 Local TV News and the Death Penalty: Social Construction of a Nebraska Execution Jeremy Harris Lipschultz University of Nebraska at Omaha, [email protected] Michael L. Hilt University of Nebraska at Omaha, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/commfacpub Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Lipschultz, Jeremy Harris and Hilt, Michael L., "Local TV News and the Death Penalty: Social Construction of a Nebraska Execution" (1998). Communication Faculty Publications. 53. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/commfacpub/53 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Communication at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Table of Contents Multimedia: Replacing the Broadcast Curriculum William Christ . 1 Professional Organizations and Mass Communication Faculty Judy Oskam . 7 Managing Anarchy: A Prescription for College Radio JeffWilkinson ................................................ 14 Local TV News and the Death Penalty: Social Constructions of a Nebraska Execution Jeremy H . Lipshultz & Michael L. Hilt . 21 A Video Production Assignment that Embodies "The Real World to Classroom Connection" Ann D. Jabro ................................................. 31 Three Faculty Evaluate Their Summer Experiences of NATPE Faculty Development Grants Dom Caristi, David Bradbury & Lena Zhang ........................ 40 Reviews of Instructional Materials . 45 (_) artwork by Brian Murph~· ocal TV News and the Death Penalty: Social Construction of a Nebraska Execution Jeremy H. Lipschultz and Michael L. Hilt University of Nebraska at Omaha This paper focused on the September 2, 1994 execution of Harold Lamont "Walkin' Willie" Otey.
    [Show full text]
  • Otey Dies in Electric Chair Execution Is the First in Nebraska Since Charles Starkweather Received Death Penalty in 1959 16 Years in Courts Now Over
    Omaha World Herald (Nebraska) September 2, 1994 Friday LINCOLN EDITION Otey Dies in Electric Chair Execution Is the First in Nebraska since Charles Starkweather Received Death Penalty in 1959 16 Years in Courts Now Over BYLINE: LESLIE BOELLSTORFF, WORLD-HERALD BUREAU SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 1 LENGTH: 1656 words DATELINE: Lincoln Harold Lamont Otey was electrocuted early this morning when Nebraska carried out its first execution in 35 years. His last hope for a reprieve vanished at 7:55 p.m. Thursday when the U.S. Supreme Court, for the eighth time in 16 years of appeals, declined to take up his case. Otey, 43, who raped and killed Jane McManus, 26, of Omaha in 1977, was the first person executed in Nebraska since serial killer Charles Starkweather in 1959. Shortly after midnight at the Nebraska State Penitentiary, Otey was strapped into the same electric chair used to kill Starkweather. After the Supreme Court rejected the last appeal, Vince Powers, one of five attorneys who have represented Otey, said he knew of no further action that could be taken in Otey's behalf. "I think it's over," Powers said. "It's a disappointment. I don't like a human being being killed with my tax dollars. "When I wake up tomorrow morning, Nebraska will not only have drive-by shootings, but sit-down killings. We've made the big time." J. Kirk Brown, assistant Nebraska attorney general, told reporters about 8:30 p.m. that the Attorney General's Office remained ready in case Otey's lawyers filed a last-minute appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Media and the Death Penalty
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Communication Faculty Publications School of Communication Spring 1999 Mass Media and the Death Penalty: Social Construction of Three Nebraska Executions Jeremy Harris Lipschultz University of Nebraska at Omaha, [email protected] Michael L. Hilt University of Nebraska at Omaha, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/commfacpub Part of the Mass Communication Commons, Public Policy Commons, and the Social Policy Commons Recommended Citation Lipschultz, Jeremy Harris and Hilt, Michael L., "Mass Media and the Death Penalty: Social Construction of Three Nebraska Executions" (1999). Communication Faculty Publications. 66. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/commfacpub/66 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Communication at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mass Media and the Death Penalty: Social Construction of Three Nebraska Executions By Jeremy H. Lipschultz and Michael L. Hilt Abstract: This research analyzes local TV news coverage of three Nebraska executions in the 1990s, the first in the state since 1959. The three Nebraska executions allow us to see mass media coverage of the death penalty from four perspectives: 1) media organization routines, journalistic beliefs, and how source selection affected the content; 2) justice was portrayed through a consonant set of social symbols; 3) the public support for the death penalty in this country may have led journalists to avoid tough questioning of public officials; 4) the resulting coverage was a social construction of reality that might influence future public opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Omaha World Herald (Nebraska)
    Omaha World Herald (Nebraska) January 20, 1992, Monday METRO EDITION Death Penalty Foes Watch Support Slip Death Penalty Chronology BYLINE: Jason Gertzen SOURCE: World-Herald Bureau SECTION: ;NEWS; Pg. 1; LENGTH: 1300 words DATELINE: Lincoln State Sen. Ernie Chambers of Omaha and some other lawmakers said public pressure is the reason that Chamber's bill to abolish the death penalty has lost support. The bill started out with 25 co-sponsors, enough to pass a bill. But now, as few as 17 support it. Intense public debate has been generated by a series of appeals filed on behalf of death row inmate Harold Lamont Otey. "The people who are trying to get Otey into the chair have made the difference," Chambers said. Chambers' Legislative Bill 327 is to be considered again this week. However, Speaker of the Legislature Dennis Baack and most other lawmakers questioned said the bill's chances of passage are slim. The measure would change the state's maximum sentence for first-degree murder from death to life in prison without possibility of parole. The bill acknowledges that the sentences would be subject to the constitutional authority of the State Pardons Board to grant clemency. "In my opinion, it will be defeated," said Baack, who supports the measure.Now Opposed Sens. Dan Lynch of Omaha and Stan Schellpeper of Stanton indicated in recent interviews that they probably would vote against the bill. Four other co-sponsors of the bill - Sens. Eric Will and Brad Ashford of Omaha, Sen. Jennie Robak of Columbus and Sen. Arlene Nelson of Grand Island - have said they either would oppose the bill or are undecided 1 about the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Are We Close? Christian Patterson – Redheaded Peckerwood
    Are We Close? Christian Patterson – Redheaded Peckerwood The title of this book raises problems that rebound upon what Christian Patterson is doing in this latest very stylish MACK publication, designed in part, I canʼt help but think, to feed the expanding market for that new bourgeois fetish and collectorʼs item, the photobook (it is already out of print). "Redheaded Peckerwood" is a derogatory term used through the mid- twentieth century by Southern African Americans and upper class whites to describe poor rural whites. It is akin to ʻredneckʼ. Wikipediaʼs extensive entry on "Peckerwood" also mentions an affinity with the abusive term "white trash." The subject of this book concerns the infamous crimes of two poor rural white kids, 19 year old Charles Starkweather and 14 year old Caril Ann Fugate. Starkweather first killed a gas station attendant in December 1957, then went on to slaughter Fugate's mother, step-father and baby sister in January 1958. Despite having witnessed the murder of her family, Fugate accompanied him as he drove across Nebraska and Wyoming on a spree of robberies and murders that claimed seven more lives, before they were arrested. Starkweather was executed in the electric chair in 1959, Fugate was sentenced to life but released on parole in 1976, and now lives in Michigan under an assumed name. We do not get all this information about the crime in this book, which remains deliberately elliptic and only gives us information in fragments. The terrible events of 1958 are now part of American mythology, perpetuated by a succession of films drawing on the killings: notably Terence Malick's Badlands, Oliver Stoneʼs Natural Born Killers and David Lynchʼs Wild at Heart.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Two the Murders
    Chapter Two The Murders It was a cold Monday evening at the KMTV newsroom in Omaha, Nebraska and the reports that typically fed their telecasts were as flat and frigid as the snow-covered plains outside. There had been no extreme weather, no upcoming events, and nothing affecting the farming community, which were the usual news items in this typically bucolic part of the country. With the holidays over, it was going to be more of the same until spring thawed the stillness of the news. The reporters often filled the time learning how to use the motion picture cameras they had only recently received. The cameras were a necessity for television news, which was typically not regarded with the same prestige as the well-established print media. If the local station hoped to compete with the newspapers, it would have to give the public what still photographs and typed words could not. But with no news stories in motion, nothing could be filmed. The slow Monday ended and the executives went home. The few remaining technicians and reporters scrabbled together whatever they could to fill news stories that night. In the meantime, the station gave way to the Huntley-Brinkley report out of New York and Washington. It was a slow news day for them as well. The local Unitarian congregation was kicking off a fund drive to build a new church, the national debt was nearing $280 billion, and their lead in for the evening was “World’s Greatest Cartoons.” Mark Gautier, alone in a dark control room upstairs from the bright lights of the studio, turned the volume of the television up to tune out the buzzing of the machines behind him.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Life of Capital Punishment in the United States, 1945-Present
    Condemned To Be Free: The Cultural Life of Capital Punishment in the United States, 1945-Present A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Daniel LaChance IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Elaine Tyler May, Advisor January 2011 © Daniel LaChance 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Writing a dissertation in the humanities can be a lonely experience. I am grateful for the intellectual and emotional support that I‘ve enjoyed from family, friends, mentors, and colleagues. Colleagues in my cohort in the Department of American Studies provided stimulating first-year discussions that have influenced how I‘ve approached this topic: Adam Bahner, Alex Mendoza, Alex Urquhart, and Scott Shoemaker made me think about culture in different ways. I‘ve greatly benefited from the feedback provided on my work by members of Elaine and Lary May‘s monthly dissertation writing group. Jason Stahl and Jeff Manuel, in particular, responded generously and helpfully to my work in its earlier stages. Beyond the University of Minnesota, I‘ve benefited from colleagues in the fields of history and law and society who have provided me with invaluable advice and help. Paul Kaplan, now an Assistant Professor at California State University, San Diego, and a collaborator on a future project, was several steps ahead of me in graduate school and wrote a fantastic dissertation about the hegemony of individualism in the practice of capital punishment in the United States that supported and inspired my own thinking on the topic: his influence is widely present here.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian A-Bombs ' Senate Democratic Leader Lyndon Johnson of Texas NSW DELHI, UF).— B
    Urges Speed THE EVENING STAR, Washington, D. C. •• A-3 Jackson It would be unwise to seek any Committee, said that “no longer additions to the emergency bill. eon we afford the luxury of Mesnwhlle, the Senate Ap- second guessing our require- In Buildup of Defense propriations Committee called ments. in the missile age, it ie guess Mt tU AWMM Prtu tance to protect our home- in Air Pore* witnesses for the first that counts." Senator Jackson, He added: closed-door testimony ss it Democrat land.” rushed hearings on the emer- of Washlnfton, today urged a "Today whatever is force re- gency defense monty biU. Me spurt in bomber produc- quired, either to deter war or i If Air Force witnesses could tion as one of the “things we to win it if deterrence fails,! need to do Immediately to stay complete testimony today, Sen- must be on hand—ready at alii ator Symington, Democrat of alive.” times.” Senator Jackson, a frequent Montana, a committee member, critic of administration defense Senator Jackson did not said the group might send the! make clear in his speech to policies, also called for a quick bill the Senate for action setup in production of long- whether hs felt additional funds later this week. range and nuclear sub- for such an accelerated pro- Senator Jackson, a **• W- r J, missiles gram member fu \*r 1 « should be included in a l mannas capable of firing such of the Senate Armed Services B M^^^TyßlrV missiles. And he said the Army •141 bllUon emergency defense should be built up.
    [Show full text]
  • “Wearing the Hempen Neck-Tie”: Lynching in Nebraska, 1858-1919
    “Wearing the Hempen Neck-Tie”: Lynching in Nebraska, 1858-1919 (Article begins on page 2 below.) This article is copyrighted by History Nebraska (formerly the Nebraska State Historical Society). You may download it for your personal use. For permission to re-use materials, or for photo ordering information, see: https://history.nebraska.gov/publications/re-use-nshs-materials Learn more about Nebraska History (and search articles) here: https://history.nebraska.gov/publications/nebraska-history-magazine History Nebraska members receive four issues of Nebraska History annually: https://history.nebraska.gov/get-involved/membership Full Citation: James E Potter, “‘Wearing the Hempen Neck-Tie’: Lynching in Nebraska, 1858-1919,” Nebraska History 93 (2012): 138-153 Article Summary: Whether the victims were accused of horse theft, murder, or rape, lynching is often viewed as frontier vigilantism that operated only before the establishment of courts and law enforcement. This notion, however, does not square with the historical record of the more than fifty Nebraskans who died at the hands of lynch mobs. Cataloging Information: Names: Luther Mitchell, Ami Ketchum, Charles Patterson, Charles Reed, Watson McDonald, Rolf Johnson, Frederick Jackson Turner, Hubert Howe Bancroft, Manfred Berg, Ken Gonzalez-Day, Stephen J Leonard, Elizabeth Taylor, Tom Jones, Michael J Pfeifer, I P “Print” Olive, Harvey Braden, John Daley, James F Bouve, Casper Dircks, Robert Wilson, Mat Miller, Ransel Grant, Mr Dunn, James Jameson, Henry Locke, John Farberger, Thomas
    [Show full text]
  • Assault and Murder a Continuum of Violence 4
    CHAPTER Assault and Murder A Continuum of Violence 4 Every unpunished murder takes away something from the security of every man’s life. distribute —Daniel Webster1 or In many respects, homicide is a relatively simple and straightforward event. It requires merely motive, opportunity, and only a modicum of skill. —Terance D. Miethe and Wendy C. Regoeczi2 post, A murder victim lies dead, and law enforcement searches for clues to apprehend a suspect. The friends and family react in horror, and they only have one question: why? —Kim Egger3 copy, The Word of Life Christian Church in upstate New York was, by all accounts, a very secretive group. Living and worshipping in a former schoolhouse, they kept mostly to themselves, which made it all the morenot surprising when, in late October 2015, this sect made national news after church members beat to death one of their own and put another in the hospital. Lucas Leonard was just 19 years old when he died from blunt force trauma that had been inflictedDo on him by numerous church members, including his parents and sister.4 Both Lucas and his brother, 17-year-old Christopher, were summoned to a “counseling” session in- which, over the course of hours, they were punched and kicked repeatedly on their stomachs, genitals, backs, and legs by fellow parishioners. Lucas was later taken to a hospital after being found not breathing and pronounced dead on arrival. His brother, also admitted to the hospital, survived his injuries. Reportedly, their ostensible crime had been to consider leaving the church. Subsequently, the parents of theProof young men were charged with first-degree manslaughter, while four other parishioners who had taken part were charged with felony assault.
    [Show full text]