DOCSLIB.ORG

MICROCOMP Output File

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MICROCOMP Output File S. HRG. 108–241, PT. 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004 HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON S. 1050 TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FOR MILITARY CON- STRUCTION, AND FOR DEFENSE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, TO PRESCRIBE PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR FOR THE ARMED FORCES, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES PART 5 EMERGING THREATS AND CAPABILITIES MARCH 14, 31; APRIL 9, 2003 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services VerDate 11-SEP-98 16:35 Feb 18, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 87327.CON SARMSER2 PsN: SARMSER2 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004—Part 5 EMERGING THREATS AND CAPABILITIES VerDate 11-SEP-98 16:35 Feb 18, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 87327.CON SARMSER2 PsN: SARMSER2 S. HRG. 108–241, PT. 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004 HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON S. 1050 TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FOR MILITARY CON- STRUCTION, AND FOR DEFENSE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, TO PRESCRIBE PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR FOR THE ARMED FORCES, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES PART 5 EMERGING THREATS AND CAPABILITIES MARCH 14, 31; APRIL 9, 2003 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 87–327 PDF WASHINGTON : 2004 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-SEP-98 16:35 Feb 18, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 87327.CON SARMSER2 PsN: SARMSER2 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES JOHN WARNER, Virginia, Chairman JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona CARL LEVIN, Michigan JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts PAT ROBERTS, Kansas ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia WAYNE ALLARD, Colorado JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama JACK REED, Rhode Island SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada BILL NELSON, Florida JAMES M. TALENT, Missouri E. BENJAMIN NELSON, Nebraska SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia MARK DAYTON, Minnesota LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina EVAN BAYH, Indiana ELIZABETH DOLE, North Carolina HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, New York JOHN CORNYN, Texas MARK PRYOR, Arkansas JUDITH A. ANSLEY, Staff Director RICHARD D. DEBOBES, Democratic Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGING THREATS AND CAPABILITIES PAT ROBERTS, Kansas Chairman WAYNE ALLARD, COLORADO JACK REED, RHODE ISLAND SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia JAMES M. TALENT, Missouri JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina BILL NELSON, Florida ELIZABETH DOLE, North Carolina EVAN BAYH, Indiana JOHN CORNYN, Texas HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, New York (II) VerDate 11-SEP-98 16:35 Feb 18, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 87327.CON SARMSER2 PsN: SARMSER2 C O N T E N T S CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF WITNESSES THE POSTURE OF U.S. JOINT FORCES COMMAND AND THE ROLE OF JOINT EXPERIMENTATION IN FORCE TRANSFORMATION MARCH 14, 2003 Page Giambastiani, Adm. Edmund P. Jr., USN, Commander, United States Joint Forces Command .................................................................................................. 5 Cebrowski, Vice Adm. Arthur K., USN (Ret.), Director, Office of Force Trans- formation, Office of the Secretary of Defense .................................................... 17 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM AND THE ROLE OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LABORATORIES MARCH 31, 2003 Wynne, Hon. Michael W., Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics ............................................................... 72 Kern, Gen. Paul J., USA, Commander, Army Materiel Command ..................... 80 Lyles, Gen. Lester L., USAF, Commander, Air Force Materiel Command ......... 88 Dyer, Vice Adm. Joseph W., USN, Commander, Naval Air Systems Command 99 U.S. SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND APRIL 9, 2003 Brown, Lt. Gen. Bryan D., USA, Deputy Commander, U.S. Special Operations Command; Accompanied by Harry E. Schulte, Acquisition Executive and Senior Procurement Executive, U.S. Special Operations Command; and Command Master Chief Richard M. Rogers, USN, U.S. Special Operations Command, Senior Enlisted Advisor .................................................................... 171 (III) VerDate 11-SEP-98 16:35 Feb 18, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 87327.CON SARMSER2 PsN: SARMSER2 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION FOR APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004 FRIDAY, MARCH 14, 2003 U.S. SENATE, SUBCOMMITTEE ON EMERGING THREATS AND CAPABILITIES, COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES, Washington, DC. THE POSTURE OF U.S. JOINT FORCES COMMAND AND THE ROLE OF JOINT EXPERIMENTATION IN FORCE TRANSFORMATION The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 9:33 a.m. in room SR–222, Russell Senate Office Building, Senator Pat Roberts (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. Committee members present: Senators Roberts, Dole, Reed, and Akaka. Majority staff members present: Charles W. Alsup, professional staff member; Carolyn M. Hanna, professional staff member; Greg- ory T. Kiley, professional staff member; and Joseph T. Sixeas, pro- fessional staff member. Minority staff members present: Richard W. Fieldhouse, profes- sional staff member; Maren R. Leed, professional staff member; and Arun A. Seraphin, professional staff member. Staff assistants present: Leah C. Brewer and Andrew W. Florell. Committee members’ assistants present: James Beauchamp, as- sistant to Senator Roberts; Henry J. Steenstra, assistant to Senator Dole; Frederick M. Downey and Aaron Scholer, assistants to Sen- ator Lieberman; Elizabeth King, assistant to Senator Reed; Davelyn Noelani Kalipi, assistant to Senator Akaka; and William K. Sutey, assistant to Senator Bill Nelson. OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR PAT ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN Senator ROBERTS. The Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities will come to order. We meet this morning to receive testimony from the Commander of the U.S. Joint Forces Command (JFCOM), Admiral Edmund P. Giambastiani, Jr., United States Navy and Vice Admiral (Ret.) Arthur K. Cebrowski—who if he is not the godfather of transformation, certainly is the god-prince, or maybe Machiavelli, or maybe all three wrapped up in one individ- ual. Admiral Cebrowski is the Director of the Office of Force Trans- formation, in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. We will discuss (1) VerDate 11-SEP-98 16:35 Feb 18, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 87327.021 SARMSER2 PsN: SARMSER2 2 the current and future role of joint experimentation on transform- ing our Armed Forces to meet the challenges of an increasingly complex, uncertain, and threatening future. Welcome, Senator Reed. Senator REED. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Senator ROBERTS. I want to welcome our two distinguished wit- nesses. We have before us two of America’s most able and willing public servants. Admiral Giambastiani, we congratulate you on your confirmation to this important position in October. This is your first appearance before this subcommittee in your new capac- ity, but I am sure it will not be your last. Your leadership role as the joint forces trainer, provider, integra- tor, and innovator is critical to the timely and coordinated trans- formation of our Armed Forces, and I am sure we will seek your counsel often, so we welcome you. Admiral Cebrowski, you served our Nation well as a highly deco- rated sailor, and now you have selflessly taken on this very dif- ficult and challenging chore of guiding the transformation of our Armed Forces, a concept around which many opinions abound. Some would say that they are unique and unprecedented ideas, and some would say brilliant and often controversial ideas that you have advocated while in the Navy, show you to be a man of vision and courage. We are fortunate to have you in this new role. I want to thank you for your past courtesy calls to me and suggestions to this subcommittee. You both are aware of the interest of this subcommittee, for strengthening our joint warfighting ability and our interest in the timely and meaningful transformation of our Armed Forces to meet the very different threats of the future. The testimony in this sub- committee in years past makes it clear that we have focused on many areas of joint military operations and capabilities. As Senator Reed knows, the passage of the Goldwater-Nichols Act in 1986 did initiate a process that has greatly changed the way our Armed Forces operate together. It puts into place processes to assess gaps in our joint capabilities and try to really identify the requirements to fix these gaps. Members of this subcommittee have been instrumental in getting a joint experimentation process initiated. I remember well my first trip to the Atlantic Command, that is what it was called in years past, and that was under the command of Admiral Gehman, and the difficulty staff and all of us had in obtaining any funding for any joint exercise. The events of September 11, however, changed a lot of things, in- cluding the urgency with which we need to review the capability of our Armed Forces to ensure that they are organized, trained, and equipped to be adaptable and capable of deterring and, if nec- essary, defeating known and emerging threats to our national secu- rity. We have the processes in place that should work, but we seem to relearn the same lessons in conflict after conflict. We also hear defense experts in and out of government really lament the lack of urgency for transformation, and our inability to rapidly acquire the new capabilities that we need.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KBR 2020 Proxy Statement
    TO OUR FOR MAKING ANYTHING POSSIBLE NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT Dear KBR, Inc. Stockholders, As I write this letter to you for our Proxy Statement, the world is in the middle of a global health crisis. The COVID-19 outbreak is an unprecedented event, and although this is a time of significant uncertainty, we are taking actions to support our people, their families and our customers. With operations in China and South Korea we had an early warning of the potential impact of the virus, and this allowed us to plan ahead and stress test our operations for remote working. I am humbled by the amazing efforts of our people around the globe who have pulled together, shared ideas and implemented best practices to continue to provide world-class service for our customers while also protecting their well-being and the health and safety of their colleagues. It is this can-do, people-centric and forward-thinking culture that makes KBR a great company to be part of. It is thus a great honor to share with you this special Proxy Statement, which marks the 100-year anniversary of our company, and to dedicate it to the people who made it possible — our incredible employees. It is remarkable to think of all they have accomplished throughout KBR’s history, beginning in the earliest days, when they worked with teams of wagons and mules to pave rural roads, to today, when they are helping NASA return to the moon and discover life beyond Earth. Over the past 100 years, KBR has grown into an innovative and dynamic global company, and I am proud to be a part of this journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Possibilities of Airframe Structures Cost Saving Through Reducing Number of Fasteners
    Possibilities of airframe structures cost saving through reducing number of fasteners RŮŽEK Roman1,a, DOUBRAVA Radek1,b, KRUSE-STRACK Thomas2,c and KOERWIEN Thomas3,d 1Czech Aerospace Research Centre, Strength of Structure Department; Beranových 130, 199 05 Praha - Letňany, Czech Republic 2 Airbus Operations GmbH, Airframe Research & Technology, Kreetslag 10 21129 Hamburg Germany 3 Airbus Defence and Space GmbH, Materials & Processes, Rechliner Str., 85077 Manching, Germany [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], d [email protected] Keywords: Key, Word, Paper, Best conference, Contribution template (maximum of 5) Abstract. Reduction of numbers of mechanical fasteners together with bonding technology application can be one of the possibilities how to decrease costs of the structure. In the paper, results based on fatigue testing of novel design approaches for damage tolerant high load transfer (HLT) joints, as e.g. panel joints, are discussed for carbon fibre reinforced plastics (CFRP) adherents. Fatigue experimental results and numerical simulations of Wide Single Lap Shear (WSLS) specimen are presented for different configurations to proof the crack stopping behaviour of "state of the art" fasteners as reference crack arrestor concept. Introduction One of the main aims of designers is application of cost-effective strategies. The composite structures can lower costs of an airframe significantly, but there are some obstacles to adopt of advanced technologies like adhesive bonding or welding and prevent to use full strength capabilities of these technologies to real structures. Nowadays, there is no fully certified bonded technology applicable to full-scale airframe structure which comply airworthiness regulations from viewpoint of damage tolerance criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Annual Report
    1 Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services (DACOWITS) 4000 Defense Pentagon, Room 2C548A Washington, District of Columbia 20301-4000 We, the appointed members of the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services (DACOWITS), do hereby submit the results of our findings and offer our recommendations to improve the policies, procedures, and climate within the Department of Defense. LTG (Ret) Claudia J. Kennedy, who chaired the Committee until September 30, also contributed to the work and recommendations of the Committee in 2011. Table of Contents Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services Executive Summary _______________________________________ i Introduction _____________________________________________ 1 Wellness Research and Recommendations ____________________ 3 Summary of Select Briefings Presented to DACOWITS 3 Summary of Focus Group Findings 6 Relevant Literature and Other Resources 9 Recommendations 10 Continuing Concerns 11 Assignments Research and Recommendations _________________ 13 Summary of Select Briefings Presented to DACOWITS 13 Summary of Focus Group Findings 15 Relevant Literature and Other Resources 17 Recommendations 19 Best Practices 20 Endnotes _____________________________________________ 23 Appendices ___________________________________________ 27 Executive Summary The Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the as an important prevention tool. The Committee Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services Services (DACOWITS) was established in 1951. Its determined in 2011 to focus its work on further ef- mandate is to provide the Secretary of Defense with ad- forts that might be made to prevent sexual assault and vice and recommendations on matters and policies re- sexual harassment in the first instance, with a view lating to the women in the Armed Forces of the United to reducing their incidence within the military com- States.
    [Show full text]
  • Massive Spikes
    Repair and Rebuild BALANCING NEW MILITARY SPENDING FOR A THREE-THEATER STRATEGY Mackenzie Eaglen OCTOBER 2017 AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE © 2017 by the American Enterprise Institute. All rights reserved. The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit, 501(c)(3) educational organization and does not take institutional positions on any issues. The views expressed here are those of the author(s). Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................1 Notes ....................................................................................................................................................................................3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 5 A Brief History of a Failed Barbell Investment Strategy .......................................................................................5 Repair and Rebuild ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 A Note on Methodology ...............................................................................................................................................21 Notes ................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Composition, Membership, Vacancies On, And/Or Appointments to Be Made to the Intelligence Oversight Board ('IOB') 2
    OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE WASHINGTON, DC 20511 Mr. Mark Rumold Electronic Frontier Foundation 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, CA 94110 OCT 6 m Reference: DF-2011-00046 Dear Mr. Rumold: This responds to your 15 February 2011 facsimile to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, wherein you requested, under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the following information: 1. The composition, membership, vacancies on, and/or appointments to be made to the Intelligence Oversight Board ('IOB') 2. Any discussions or communications between officials or employees of ODNI and any White House officials or employees regarding the composition, membership, vacancies on, and/or appointments to be made to the IOB. 3. Any discussions or communications between officials or employees of ODNI and officials or employees of other intelligence agencies regarding the composition, membership, vacancies on, and/or appointments to be made to the IOB. 4. Any discussions or communications between officials or employees of ODNI and any member of Congress or congressional staffer regarding the composition, membership, vacancies on, and/or appointments to be made to the IOB. 5. Any discussions or communications regarding the reasons, explanations, or rationales provided for President Obama's appointment of, or the failure to appoint, members to the IOB. As this response completes our processing of your request, we have administratively closed your 28 February 2011 appeal of our denial of expedited processing. Your request was processed in accordance with the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552, as amended. ODNI searches resulted in the location of three documents responsive to your request.
    [Show full text]
  • From Biomimetic Chemistry to Bio‐Inspired Materials
    www.advmat.de www.MaterialsViews.com REVIEW Progressive Macromolecular Self-Assembly: From Biomimetic Chemistry to Bio-Inspired Materials Yu Zhao , Fuji Sakai , Lu Su , Yijiang Liu , Kongchang Wei , Guosong Chen ,* and Ming Jiang * Dedicated to the 20th Anniversary of the Department of Macromolecular Science of Fudan University was highlighted, with the purpose of Macromolecular self-assembly (MSA) has been an active and fruitful research expanding the scope of chemistry.[ 1b ] At fi eld since the 1980s, especially in this new century, which is promoted by its early stage, biomimetic chemistry was the remarkable developments in controlled radical polymerization in polymer regarded as a branch of organic chemistry and the work concentrated on the level chemistry, etc. and driven by the demands in bio-related investigations and of molecules, formation and cleavage of applications. In this review, we try to summarize the trends and recent pro- covalent bonds following the way learning gress in MSA in relation to biomimetic chemistry and bio-inspired materials. from the living body. Artifi cial enzymes Our paper covers representative achievements in the fabrication of artifi cial aiming at fast and high selectivity have building blocks for life, cell-inspired biomimetic materials, and macro- been the key research subject in biomi- metic chemistry with emphasis on the molecular assemblies mimicking the functions of natural materials and their idea of molecular recognition, which is applications. It is true that the current status of the deliberately designed and also the center of supramolecular chem- obtained nano-objects based on MSA including a variety of micelles, multi- istry. Later, the principle and methodology compartment vesicles, and some hybrid and complex nano-objects is at their of biomimetic chemistry have gradually very fi rst stage to mimic nature, but signifi cant and encouraging progress expanded and penetrated to other sub-dis- has been made in achieving a certain similarity in morphologies or properties ciplines with great successes.
    [Show full text]
  • Nautical Education for Offshore Cxtractivc
    Lso-B-7i-ooz NAUTICALEDUCATION FOR OFFSHORE CXTRACTIVC INDUSTRIES RV G-H.HOFFMANN WITH FREDTOWNSEND AND WARREN NORVILLE 5' GRAHT PUI3I.ICATIOHHO. LSU-II-77-OL C6NTCRfOR WETLAND RESOURCES ~ LOUISIANA STATC UNIVf RSIEY ~ BATON ROUCIC, LOUISIANA 7000 NAUTICAL EDUCATION FOR THE V~M$pQog767 QoM G. H. Ho f fmann with Fred Townsend and Warren Norville LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR WETLAND RESOURCES BATON ROUGE, LA 70803 Sea Grant Publication No. LSU-8-77-001 September 1977 This work is a result of research sponsored jointly by the Terrebonne Parish School Board and the Louisiana Sea Grant Program, a part of the National Sea Grant Program maintained by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce. CONTENTS List of Figures List of Tables Vi Acknowledgments Beginnings of the Oil Industry 1 2 The Offshore Revolution Drilling a Wildcat Well The Petr omar ine Fleet 46 6 4.1 Tankers 4.2 Seagoing Tank Barges and Tugs ll 4.3 Inland Tank Barges and Towboats 13 4.4 Inland Drilling Barges 16 4.5 Offshore Drilling Tenders 16 4.6 Submersible Drilling Vessels 17 4.7 3ack-up DrilIing Barges 18 4.8 Semi-Submersible Drilling Vessels 19 4.9 Drill Ships 20 4.10 Crewboats 27 4.11 Supply vessels 28 4.12 Tugs 30 4.13 Derrick Barges 31 4.I4 Pipelaying Barges 31 4.15 Air Cushion Vehicles ACV! 37 Producing Oil and Gas 37 Design Procedures 44 6.1 Owner Requirements 44 6.2 Design Drawings and Specifications 45 6.3 Regulatory Agencies 49 6.4 Design Calculations 54 6.5 The Measurements of a Ship 60 6.6 Free Surface 68 6.7 Model Testing 69 Construction Procedure 70 7.1 Estimating 70 7.2 Working Plans 72 7.3 Production 74 7.4 Inspection 76 7.5 Trials and Tests 78 Delivery 80 Stability and Trim 82 9.1 Stability 82 9.2 Transverse Metacenter 86 9.3 Calculating GM 87 9.4 KM and KG 88 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Nspc UAG NOTES FOURTH PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA October 21, 2019
    NSpC UAG NOTES FOURTH PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA October 21, 2019 Courtyard by Marriott, Washington Downtown / Convention Center Shaw Ballroom 901 L Street NW Washington, DC 20001 1:00-1:15 CALL TO ORDER, OPENING REMARKS, & MEETING GOALS James Joseph “JJ” Miller – UAG Executive Secretary Admiral James Ellis, Jr., USN, Retired – UAG Chair 1:15-2:15 EXPERIENCES AND ISSUES OF THE NATIONAL POSITIONING, NAVIGATION, AND TIMING ADVISORY BOARD Dr. Bradford Parkinson – 1st Vice Chair, PNT Advisory Board 2:15-2:45 EXPLORATION & DISCOVERY SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT General Lester Lyles, USAF, Retired – Subcommittee Chair 2:45-3:30 OUTREACH & EDUCATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT Colonel Eileen Collins, USAF, Retired – Subcommittee Chair 3:30-3:45 BREAK 3:45-4:15 SPACE POLICY & INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT Dr. David Wolf – Subcommittee Chair 4:15-4:30 NATIONAL SECURITY SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT Admiral James Ellis, Jr., USN, Retired – Subcommittee Chair 4:30-4:45 TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT Colonel Pamela Melroy, USAF, Retired – Subcommittee Chair 4:45-5:15 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & INDUSTRIAL BASE SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT Dr. Mary Lynne Dittmar and Eric Stallmer – Subcommittee Co-Chairs 5:15-5:30 PUBLIC COMMENT 5:30 ADJOURN ORGANIZATIONAL CHART National Space Council Executive Secretary Chair of Users’ Advisory Group Economic Exploration & Development & Discovery IndustrIal Base National Six Outreach & Security Subcommittees Education Space Policy & Technology & International Innovation Engagement USERS’ ADVISORY GROUP SUBCOMMITTEES ECONOMIC EXPLORATION AND NATIONAL SECURITY DEVELOPMENT AND DISCOVERY INDUSTRIAL BASE Adm. James Ellis, Jr. Gen. Lester Lyles (USN, Ret.), Chair Dr. Mary Lynne Dittmar, (USAF, Ret.), Chair Co-Chair Tory Bruno Eric Stallmer, Co-Chair Col. Buzz Aldrin (USAF, Ret.) Dean Cheng Tory Bruno Tim Ellis Tory Bruno Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Analysis of a Monopropellant Micropropulsion System for a Cubesat
    THERMAL ANALYSIS OF A MONOPROPELLANT MICROPROPULSION SYSTEM FOR A CUBESAT A Thesis presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Degree in Aerospace Engineering by Erin C. Stearns August 2013 © 2013 Erin C. Stearns ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: Thermal Analysis of a Monopropellant Micropropulsion System for a CubeSat AUTHOR: Erin C. Stearns DATE SUBMITTED: August 2013 COMMITTEE CHAIR: Dr. Kira Abercromby, Assistant Professor Cal Poly Aerospace Engineering Department COMMITTEE MEMBER: Dr. Jordi Puig-Suari, Professor Cal Poly Aerospace Engineering Department COMMITTEE MEMBER: Dr. Kim Shollenberger, Professor Cal Poly Mechanical Engineering Department COMMITTEE MEMBER: Chris Biddy, Vice President of Engineering Stellar Exploration, Inc. iii ABSTRACT Thermal Analysis of a Monopropellant Micropropulsion System for a CubeSat Erin C. Stearns Propulsive capabilities on a CubeSat are the next step in advancement in the Aerospace Industry. This is no longer a quest that is being sought by just university programs, but a challenge that is being taken on by all of the industry due to the low-cost missions that can be accomplished. At this time, all of the proposed micro-thruster systems still require some form of development or testing before being flight- ready. Stellar Exploration, Inc. is developing a monopropellant micropropulsion system designed specifically for CubeSat application. The addition of a thruster to a CubeSat would expand the possibilities of what CubeSat missions are capable of achieving. The development of these miniature systems comes with many challenges. One of the largest challenges that a hot thruster faces is the ability to complete burns for the specified mission without transferring excessive heat into the propulsion tank.
    [Show full text]
  • IGNITION! an Informal History of Liquid Rocket Propellants by John D
    IGNITION! U.S. Navy photo This is what a test firing should look like. Note the mach diamonds in the ex­ haust stream. U.S. Navy photo And this is what it may look like if something goes wrong. The same test cell, or its remains, is shown. IGNITION! An Informal History of Liquid Rocket Propellants by John D. Clark Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. George Santayana RUTGERS UNIVERSITY PRESS IS New Brunswick, New Jersey Copyright © 1972 by Rutgers University, the State University of New Jersey Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 72-185390 ISBN: 0-8135-0725-1 Manufactured in the United Suites of America by Quinn & Boden Company, Inc., Rithway, New Jersey This book is dedicated to my wife Inga, who heckled me into writing it with such wifely re­ marks as, "You talk a hell of a fine history. Now set yourself down in front of the typewriter — and write the damned thing!" In Re John D. Clark by Isaac Asimov I first met John in 1942 when I came to Philadelphia to live. Oh, I had known of him before. Back in 1937, he had published a pair of science fiction shorts, "Minus Planet" and "Space Blister," which had hit me right between the eyes. The first one, in particular, was the earliest science fiction story I know of which dealt with "anti-matter" in realistic fashion. Apparently, John was satisfied with that pair and didn't write any more s.f., kindly leaving room for lesser lights like myself.
    [Show full text]
  • Fatigue Behavior and Damage Tolerant Design of Bonded Joints for Aerospace Application on Fiber Metal Laminates and Composites
    29th ICAF Symposium – Nagoya, 7–9 June 2017 Fatigue behavior and damage tolerant design of bonded joints for aerospace application on Fiber Metal Laminates and composites Kruse, Thomas 1, Thomas Körwien², Roman Ruzek³, Robert Hangx1, Calvin Rans1 1 Technical University of Delft, Netherlands 2Airbus Defence and Space, Germany ³VZLU, Czech Republic Abstract: Today, the application of adhesive bonding technology for primary aerospace structures is limited due to the certification regulations. State of the art is the widely used “chicken rivet” as crack arrestor which is limiting the benefits of bonding technology, particularly in composite bonded joints. In this paper results from fatigue testing of novel design approaches for damage tolerant high load transfer (HLT) joints as e.g. Panel Joints or large bonded repairs will be discussed for CFRP and for Fiber Matel Laminates´(FML) adherents. Results from fatigue testing with Wide Single Lapshear (WSLS) specimen will be presented for different configurations to proof the crack stopping behavior of sate of the art fasteners as reference crack arrestor concept. STATE OF THE ART BONDING TECHNOLOGY With the entry into service of the A350XWB a consequent evolution of the usage of CFRP for primary structures within Airbus Group has reached the next milestone. After a long and excellent experience with CFRP in civil and military applications, first applied on secondary structures and since 1983 for the vertical stabilizer as first major primary structural component for civil aircrafts, Airbus Group has now reached the next step in the transition from a metallic to a composite aircraft with the first CFRP fuselage of an Airbus aircraft on A350 XWB.
    [Show full text]
  • Delta Qualification Test of Aerojet Hydrazine
    45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit AIAA 2009-5481 2 - 5 August 2009, Denver, Colorado Delta-Qualification Test of Aerojet 6 and 9 lbf MR-106 Monopropellant Hydrazine Thrusters for Use on the Atlas Centaur Upper Stage During the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) and Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) Missions Jeffrey P. Honse1 Aerojet-General Corporation, Redmond, WA, 98052 Carl T. Bangasser2 United Launch Alliance, Littleton, CO, 80127 Michael J. Wilson3 Aerojet-General Corporation, Redmond, WA, 98052 This paper discusses a Delta-Qualification test of Aerojet’s 6 and 9 lbf monopropellant hydrazine MR-106 thrusters for use on the Atlas Centaur upper stage while operating in an atypical mode and for an extended period of time. This qualification testing was performed in support of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) and Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) missions. The primary objective of the LCROSS mission is to determine the presence or absence of water ice in a permanently shadowed crater near a lunar polar region. The accomplishment of this objective requires that the Atlas V rocket’s Centaur upper stage perform a LCROSS orbit insertion as well as a fly-by of the moon before the Centaur upper stage crashes into a lunar crater to create a debris plume. The LCROSS satellite will pass through the debris to collect and relay plume constituent data back to Earth. Prior to the LCROSS separation from the Centaur upper stage, the Centaur pneumatic pressurization system will transition from regulated to blow-down mode, which requires that the thrusters operate at a lower propellant feed pressure than had previously been qualified.
    [Show full text]