DOCSLIB.ORG

Surviving and Operating Through the Lunar Night

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Surviving and Operating Through the Lunar Night Surviving and Operating Through the Lunar Night Future Operations in Space (FISO) Seminar April 1, 2020 Andrew Petro NASA Headquarters 1 Workshop sponsored by the NASA Space Technology, Science, and Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorates (STMD, SMD & HEOMD) With support from the Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute (SSERVI), Lunar Exploration Analysis Group (LEAG), NASA Space Portal, and Universities Space Research Association (USRA). Over 200 participants from industry, academia, the lunar science community, and government agencies. 2 The Lunar Day-Night Cycle 14 Earth days of sunlight followed by 14 Earth days of continuous darkness and extreme cold (with no solar power) and no moderating atmosphere presents one of the most demanding environmental challenge that will be faced in the exploration of the solar system Rough Comparison of Temperature Ranges for Earth, Moon and Mars Lunar Permanent Shadow Lunar Equator – Average Day to Night Range -250˚C -130˚C 120˚C Mars Equator – Day to Night -70˚C 10˚C Montana Winter – Day to Night -15˚C 10˚C Death Valley Summer – Day to Night 30˚C 45˚C 0˚K 3 Previous Lunar Night Experience Surveyor Spacecraft Missions - powered by solar arrays and batteries not specifically designed to survive the night. Several did operate into the night and were revived on subseQuent days. Surveyor 1: 48 hours into the first lunar night, partial data obtained as late as the sixth lunar day Surveyor 3: Shut down 2 hours after sunset on the first lunar night Surveyor 5: 115 hours into the first lunar night and 215 hours into the seCond lunar night Surveyor 6: 40 hours into the first lunar night Surveyor 7: 80 hours into the first lunar night, revived on the seCond lunar day but ContaCt lost before sunset 4 Previous Lunar Night Experience Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Packages (ALSEP’s) 1969-77 At Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 landing sites – used 70-Watt Plutonium-238 radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTG’s) and operated continuously for several years. (Shutdown intentionally in 1977.) 5 Previous Lunar Night Experience Soviet Lunokhod Rovers 1970-1973 Top of the rover had a lid with solar arrays and a radiator which could be opened during daytime operations and closed at night for hibernation. Radioactive Polonium 210 source heated air circulated through a pressurized chamber containing electronics, batteries, and instruments. In the lunar morning, the rovers waited to heat up for two days before moving. During lunar noon, movement was limited because the high sun angle made it impossible to see surface features such as craters. Lunokhod 1 survived 11 lunar day-night cycles Lunokhod 2 survived 4 day-night cycles. 6 Recent Lunar Night Experience Chinese Yutu Rovers - powered by solar panels for operation and battery charging during daylight, powered down at night with some heating provided by radioisotope heater units (Plutonium-238) Yutu 1: Landed in December 2013. Stopped moving after 1 month, transmitted data for several years. Yutu-2: Landed in January 2019 and still operational. Has operated through 15 lunar days so far. 7 Survive and Operate through the Lunar Night Potential Applications Stationary instrument package (like ALSEP and larger) – operate in sunlight, hibernate at night – operate in sunlight, minimal operation at night – operate continuously through day/night cycle – operate continuously in permanently shadowed region (PSR) Distributed network of instruments (generally small) – operate continuously through day/night cycle Robotic rover – operate in sunlight, hibernate at night – operate in sunlight, minimal operation at night – operate continuously through day/night cycle – operate for limited periods in PSR 8 Survive and Operate through the Lunar Night Potential Applications Pressurized rover, construction or excavation vehicle – operate in sunlight, hibernate at night – operate continuously through day/night cycle – operate for limited periods in PSR Habitat – operate continuously through day/night cycle Propellant Plant – operate in sunlight, hibernate at night – operate continuously through day/night cycle 9 Survive and Operate through the Lunar Night Potential Solutions and Strategies Generate power continuously - fuel cells - Fission - radioactive isotope - thermo-electric – using large temperature differentials Expend stored energy - batteries or other chemical systems - fuel cells - mechanical storage (fly wheel) - electromagnetic storage (especially with superconductors) Absorb stored heat - internal heat sink - reclaim waste heat - external heat sink (wadi), - chemical reaction - radioactive isotope 10 Survive and Operate through the Lunar Night Potential Solutions and Strategies Conserve energy - increase efficiency - thermal switches - insulation and sheltering - increase component tolerance for cold Obtain power from remote source - long distance transmission lines - power beaming – for power or heat - globally from an orbiting satellite or locally between a power source and mobile assets Minimize eclipse - through mobility - follow the sun (most practical near poles) - locate in areas of minimal eclipse (high elevations near poles) - very tall tower for solar array (near poles) 11 Survive and Operate through the Lunar Night Recommendations Develop and Advance Technology - Advanced batteries – improved performance, mass, and thermal robustness - Solar arrays for daytime power, regenerative fuels cells provide the lowest mass, non-nuclear option to supply power during the lunar night - Small fission power systems such as “Kilopower” - Potential for much larger scale fission generators - Power beaming - Novel energy storage Thermal modeling of conditions during dawn and dusk and the extreme heat of lunar noon Systematic effort to identify, certify, and document avionics and other components for the extreme thermal environment of the lunar surface. Get Started Now Initiate survive the night efforts from the beginning and improve incrementally: hibernation to limited nighttime operations to continuous operation Use commercial Lunar Payload Services (cLPS) missions to accelerate demonstration of new technology and capabilities 12 NOW 13 IN THE FUTURE? .. .. Survive and Operate Through the Lunar Night – Workshop Report https://www.lpi.usra.edu/leag/ 14.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exploration of the Moon
    Exploration of the Moon The physical exploration of the Moon began when Luna 2, a space probe launched by the Soviet Union, made an impact on the surface of the Moon on September 14, 1959. Prior to that the only available means of exploration had been observation from Earth. The invention of the optical telescope brought about the first leap in the quality of lunar observations. Galileo Galilei is generally credited as the first person to use a telescope for astronomical purposes; having made his own telescope in 1609, the mountains and craters on the lunar surface were among his first observations using it. NASA's Apollo program was the first, and to date only, mission to successfully land humans on the Moon, which it did six times. The first landing took place in 1969, when astronauts placed scientific instruments and returnedlunar samples to Earth. Apollo 12 Lunar Module Intrepid prepares to descend towards the surface of the Moon. NASA photo. Contents Early history Space race Recent exploration Plans Past and future lunar missions See also References External links Early history The ancient Greek philosopher Anaxagoras (d. 428 BC) reasoned that the Sun and Moon were both giant spherical rocks, and that the latter reflected the light of the former. His non-religious view of the heavens was one cause for his imprisonment and eventual exile.[1] In his little book On the Face in the Moon's Orb, Plutarch suggested that the Moon had deep recesses in which the light of the Sun did not reach and that the spots are nothing but the shadows of rivers or deep chasms.
    [Show full text]
  • 350 International Atlas of Lunar Exploration 8 January 1973
    :UP/3-PAGINATION/IAW-PROOFS/3B2/978«52181«5(M.3D 350 [7428] 19.8.20073:28PM 350 International Atlas of Lunar Exploration 8 January 1973: Luna 21 and Lunokhod 2 (Soviet Union) The 4850 kg Luna 21 spacecraft was launched from Baikonur at 06:56 UT on a Proton booster, placed in a low Earth parking orbit and then put on a lunar trajec­ tory. Power problems required that the Lunokhod solar panel be opened in flight to augment power, and stowed again for the trajectory correction and orbit insertion burns and for landing. On 12 January Luna 21 entered a 90 km by 100 km lunar orbit inclined 60° to the equator. After a day in orbit the low point was reduced to 16 km, and on 15 January after 40 orbits the vehicle braked and dropped to just 750 m above the surface. Then the main thrusters slowed the descent, and at :UP/3-PAGINATION/IAW-PROOFS/3B2/978«52181«5(M.3D 351 [7428] 19.8.20073:28PM Chronological sequence of missions and events 351 22 m a set of secondary thrusters took over until the After landing, Lunokhod 2 surveyed its surround­ spacecraft was only 1.5 meters high, when the thrusters ings. A rock partly blocked the west-facing ramp so the were shut off. Landing time was 23:35 UT. rover was driven east across a shallow crater, leaving the The site was in Le Monnier crater on the eastern edge lander at 01:14 UT on 16 January. It rested 30 m from of Mare Serenitatis, 180 km north of the Apollo 17 land­ the descent stage to recharge its batteries until 18 ing site, at 25.85° N, 30.45° E (Figure 327A).
    [Show full text]
  • II. Causes of Tides III. Tidal Variations IV. Lunar Day and Frequency of Tides V
    Tides I. What are Tides? II. Causes of Tides III. Tidal Variations IV. Lunar Day and Frequency of Tides V. Monitoring Tides Wikimedia FoxyOrange [CC BY-SA 3.0 Tides are not explicitly included in the NGSS PerFormance Expectations. From the NGSS Framework (M.S. Space Science): “There is a strong emphasis on a systems approach, using models oF the solar system to explain astronomical and other observations oF the cyclic patterns oF eclipses, tides, and seasons.” From the NGSS Crosscutting Concepts: Observed patterns in nature guide organization and classiFication and prompt questions about relationships and causes underlying them. For Elementary School: • Similarities and diFFerences in patterns can be used to sort, classiFy, communicate and analyze simple rates oF change For natural phenomena and designed products. • Patterns oF change can be used to make predictions • Patterns can be used as evidence to support an explanation. For Middle School: • Graphs, charts, and images can be used to identiFy patterns in data. • Patterns can be used to identiFy cause-and-eFFect relationships. The topic oF tides have an important connection to global change since spring tides and king tides are causing coastal Flooding as sea level has been rising. I. What are Tides? Tides are one oF the most reliable phenomena on Earth - they occur on a regular and predictable cycle. Along with death and taxes, tides are a certainty oF liFe. Tides are apparent changes in local sea level that are the result of long-period waves that move through the oceans. Photos oF low and high tide on the coast oF the Bay oF Fundy in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Structures on the Moon and Mars: Engineering Challenges and Structural Design Parameters for Proposed Habitats
    Building Structures on the Moon and Mars: Engineering Challenges and Structural Design Parameters for Proposed Habitats Ramesh B. Malla, Ph.D., F. ASCE, A.F. AIAA Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 (E-Mail: [email protected]) Presented at the Breakout Panel Session- Theme C - Habitats (Preparation and Architecture) RETH Workshop- Grand Challenges and Key Research Questions to Achieve Resilient Long-Term Extraterrestrial Habitats Purdue University; October 22-23, 2018 What is Structural Resiliency? Characterized by four traits: Robustness Ability to maintain critical functions in crisis Minimization of direct and indirect Resourcefulness losses from hazards through enhanced Ability to effectively manage crisis as it resistance and robustness to extreme unfolds events, as well as more effective Rapid Recovery recovery strategies. Reconstitute normal operations quickly and effectively Redundancy Backup resources to support originals Per: National Infrastructure Advisory Council, 2009 Hazard Sources & Potential Lunar Habitats Potential Hazard Sources Available Habitat Types Impact (Micrometeorite, Debris) Inflatable Hard Vacuum Membrane Extreme Temperature Rigid-Frame Structure Seismic Activity Hybrid Frame- Low Gravity “Bessel Crater” - https://www.lpi.usra.edu/science/kiefer/Education/SSRG2- Craters/craterstructure.html Membrane Radiation Structure Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCR) Subsurface Solar-Emitted Particles (SEP) Variants Malla, et al. (1995)
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Lunar Horizon Glow with the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA)
    Searching for lunar horizon glow with the lunar orbiter laser altimeter (LOLA) M. K. Barker, D. Smith, T. McClanahan, E. Mazarico, X. Sun, M. T. Zuber, G. A. Neumann, M. H. Torrence, J. W. Head DAP-2017 Boulder, CO Jan. 11-13, 2017 Lunar Horizon Glow • Surveyor landers, Lunokhod-2 lander, Apollo 17 astronaut sketches (Rennilson & Criswell 1974, Severnyi et al. 1975, McCoy & Criswell 1974, Zook & McCoy 1991) ==> Electrostatic levitation, dynamic lofting (Stubbs et al. 2006, Farrell et al. 2007) • Apollo 15 photographs at dawn: LHG extending ~30 km above horizon, N~103-105 cm-2 for grain r = 0.1 µm (McCoy 1976, Glenar et al. 2011) ==> Meteor stream impact ejecta could initiate a saltation-like cascade process • Recent searches with Clementine Star Trackers, LRO/LAMP, and LADEE/LDEX gave limits on dust density ~100x lower than A15 (Glenar et al. 2014, Feldman et al. 2014, Szalay & Horányi 2015, Horányi et al. 2015) Glenar et al. (2011) Lunar Orbiter ~65 m Diffractive Optical Element Laser Altimeter (LOLA) •5-beam time-of-flight laser altimeter onboard the Lunar Reconnaissance 50 m Orbiter (LRO) 5-m diameter •28 Hz laser, 140 measurements/sec observation area (red) •Each shot provides: • up to 5 ranges to surface (10 cm prec.) 20-m FOV (green) • footprint-scale surface roughness • footprint-scale slope 10 to 12 m apart • 1064-nm reflectance of surface along track •Detectors: 5 fiber optically-coupled avalanche photodiodes LOLA has two radiometric modes: (1) Active radiometry: LOLA laser is the light source. 1064-nm normal albedo Lemelin et al. (2016) (2) Passive radiometry: Sun is the light source.
    [Show full text]
  • SOIL Xecfinics RESULTS of LUNA 16
    SOIL XECfiNICS RESULTS OF LUNA 16 Stewart bl. Johnson U. David Carrier, I11 1172-14896 (NASA-TI-I-67 566) SOIL lECAANICS R OF LUWA 16 AN D LUYOKHOD 1: A PBELI RSPORT S.Y. Johnson, nt a1 (HASA) Unclas 1971 13 p NASA-Manned Spacecraft Center .Houston, Texas 77058 9 June 1'971 The Ninth International Symposium on Space Technology and Science was held in Tokyo, Jcpan May 17-22, 1971. At this meeting two papers ? (Ref. 1 and 2) were presented giving results of the Luna 16 and Lunokhod-I experiments. These reports, whi ch were presented by representatives of the Academy of Sclence of the USSR, concentrateci on nechanical ard physicai properties of the luaar soil. In addition to these two papers, there were two 20-mi nute films shown on Luna 16 and Lc.~okhodI. The overall impression was that the USSR has performed a nuch more extensive soi l mechanics i'nvestigation on thei r returned lunar-~&~~leand as part of the Lunokhod traver;a than has been- - perfomed by the U.S. to date in the Apol lo program. Apparently the aussian soil nechanics investigations are being conducted with the vf e-d that datbcollected now will be valuable in future exploratidn of- - the 1unar surface. It was suggested that later versions of Lunokhod would Ce used to explore t!e far side of the Roan and would have a data ,storage capabi 1i ty to use while cut of communication with eart!!. - At the meeting in Tokyo, results were presented for ths Lunokhod-I penetrometer and analyses of the interactions between the vehicle wheds and the lunar soi 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Calendars of India
    The Calendars of India By Vinod K. Mishra, Ph.D. 1 Preface. 4 1. Introduction 5 2. Basic Astronomy behind the Calendars 8 2.1 Different Kinds of Days 8 2.2 Different Kinds of Months 9 2.2.1 Synodic Month 9 2.2.2 Sidereal Month 11 2.2.3 Anomalistic Month 12 2.2.4 Draconic Month 13 2.2.5 Tropical Month 15 2.2.6 Other Lunar Periodicities 15 2.3 Different Kinds of Years 16 2.3.1 Lunar Year 17 2.3.2 Tropical Year 18 2.3.3 Siderial Year 19 2.3.4 Anomalistic Year 19 2.4 Precession of Equinoxes 19 2.5 Nutation 21 2.6 Planetary Motions 22 3. Types of Calendars 22 3.1 Lunar Calendar: Structure 23 3.2 Lunar Calendar: Example 24 3.3 Solar Calendar: Structure 26 3.4 Solar Calendar: Examples 27 3.4.1 Julian Calendar 27 3.4.2 Gregorian Calendar 28 3.4.3 Pre-Islamic Egyptian Calendar 30 3.4.4 Iranian Calendar 31 3.5 Lunisolar calendars: Structure 32 3.5.1 Method of Cycles 32 3.5.2 Improvements over Metonic Cycle 34 3.5.3 A Mathematical Model for Intercalation 34 3.5.3 Intercalation in India 35 3.6 Lunisolar Calendars: Examples 36 3.6.1 Chinese Lunisolar Year 36 3.6.2 Pre-Christian Greek Lunisolar Year 37 3.6.3 Jewish Lunisolar Year 38 3.7 Non-Astronomical Calendars 38 4. Indian Calendars 42 4.1 Traditional (Siderial Solar) 42 4.2 National Reformed (Tropical Solar) 49 4.3 The Nānakshāhī Calendar (Tropical Solar) 51 4.5 Traditional Lunisolar Year 52 4.5 Traditional Lunisolar Year (vaisnava) 58 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet Space Program
    C05500088 TOP eEGRET iuf 3EEA~ NIE 11-1-71 THE SOVIET SPACE PROGRAM Declassified Under Authority of the lnteragency Security Classification Appeals Panel, E.O. 13526, sec. 5.3(b)(3) ISCAP Appeal No. 2011 -003, document 2 Declassification date: November 23, 2020 ifOP GEEAE:r C05500088 1'9P SloGRET CONTENTS Page THE PROBLEM ... 1 SUMMARY OF KEY JUDGMENTS l DISCUSSION 5 I. SOV.IET SPACE ACTIVITY DURING TfIE PAST TWO YEARS . 5 II. POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE PROSPECTS . 6 A. General ............................................. 6 B. Organization and Management . ............... 6 C. Economics .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. 8 III. SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL FACTORS ... 9 A. General .. .. .. .. .. 9 B. Launch Vehicles . 9 C. High-Energy Propellants .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 11 D. Manned Spacecraft . 12 E. Life Support Systems . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 15 F. Non-Nuclear Power Sources for Spacecraft . 16 G. Nuclear Power and Propulsion ..... 16 Te>P M:EW TCS 2032-71 IOP SECl<ET" C05500088 TOP SECRGJ:. IOP SECREI Page H. Communications Systems for Space Operations . 16 I. Command and Control for Space Operations . 17 IV. FUTURE PROSPECTS ....................................... 18 A. General ............... ... ···•· ................. ····· ... 18 B. Manned Space Station . 19 C. Planetary Exploration . ........ 19 D. Unmanned Lunar Exploration ..... 21 E. Manned Lunar Landfog ... 21 F. Applied Satellites ......... 22 G. Scientific Satellites ........................................ 24 V. INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATION ............. 24 A. USSR-European Nations .................................... 24 B. USSR-United States 25 ANNEX A. SOVIET SPACE ACTIVITY ANNEX B. SOVIET SPACE LAUNCH VEHICLES ANNEX C. SOVIET CHRONOLOGICAL SPACE LOG FOR THE PERIOD 24 June 1969 Through 27 June 1971 TCS 2032-71 IOP SLClt~ 70P SECRE1- C05500088 TOP SEGR:R THE SOVIET SPACE PROGRAM THE PROBLEM To estimate Soviet capabilities and probable accomplishments in space over the next 5 to 10 years.' SUMMARY OF KEY JUDGMENTS A.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographs Written Historical and Descriptive
    CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY HAER FL-8-B BUILDING AE HAER FL-8-B (John F. Kennedy Space Center, Hanger AE) Cape Canaveral Brevard County Florida PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 100 Alabama St. NW Atlanta, GA 30303 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY BUILDING AE (Hangar AE) HAER NO. FL-8-B Location: Hangar Road, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Industrial Area, Brevard County, Florida. USGS Cape Canaveral, Florida, Quadrangle. Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: E 540610 N 3151547, Zone 17, NAD 1983. Date of Construction: 1959 Present Owner: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Present Use: Home to NASA’s Launch Services Program (LSP) and the Launch Vehicle Data Center (LVDC). The LVDC allows engineers to monitor telemetry data during unmanned rocket launches. Significance: Missile Assembly Building AE, commonly called Hangar AE, is nationally significant as the telemetry station for NASA KSC’s unmanned Expendable Launch Vehicle (ELV) program. Since 1961, the building has been the principal facility for monitoring telemetry communications data during ELV launches and until 1995 it processed scientifically significant ELV satellite payloads. Still in operation, Hangar AE is essential to the continuing mission and success of NASA’s unmanned rocket launch program at KSC. It is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A in the area of Space Exploration as Kennedy Space Center’s (KSC) original Mission Control Center for its program of unmanned launch missions and under Criterion C as a contributing resource in the CCAFS Industrial Area Historic District.
    [Show full text]
  • Lunar Laser Ranging: the Millimeter Challenge
    REVIEW ARTICLE Lunar Laser Ranging: The Millimeter Challenge T. W. Murphy, Jr. Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0424, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Lunar laser ranging has provided many of the best tests of gravitation since the first Apollo astronauts landed on the Moon. The march to higher precision continues to this day, now entering the millimeter regime, and promising continued improvement in scientific results. This review introduces key aspects of the technique, details the motivations, observables, and results for a variety of science objectives, summarizes the current state of the art, highlights new developments in the field, describes the modeling challenges, and looks to the future of the enterprise. PACS numbers: 95.30.Sf, 04.80.-y, 04.80.Cc, 91.4g.Bg arXiv:1309.6294v1 [gr-qc] 24 Sep 2013 CONTENTS 2 Contents 1 The LLR concept 3 1.1 Current Science Results . 4 1.2 A Quantitative Introduction . 5 1.3 Reflectors and Divergence-Imposed Requirements . 5 1.4 Fundamental Measurement and World Lines . 10 2 Science from LLR 12 2.1 Relativity and Gravity . 12 2.1.1 Equivalence Principle . 13 2.1.2 Time-rate-of-change of G ....................... 14 2.1.3 Gravitomagnetism, Geodetic Precession, and other PPN Tests . 14 2.1.4 Inverse Square Law, Extra Dimensions, and other Frontiers . 16 2.2 Lunar and Earth Physics . 16 2.2.1 The Lunar Interior . 16 2.2.2 Earth Orientation, Precession, and Coordinate Frames . 18 3 LLR Capability across Time 20 3.1 Brief LLR History .
    [Show full text]
  • Dsc Pub Edited
    1968 93) few craters, much like the mare sites, Surveyor 7 although the general area was rougher. About Nation: U.S. (43) 21 hours after landing, ground controllers Objective(s): lunar soft-landing fired a pyrotechnic charge to drop the alpha- Spacecraft: Surveyor-G scattering instrument on the lunar surface. Spacecraft Mass: 1,040.1 kg When the instrument failed to move, con- Mission Design and Management: NASA JPL trollers used the robot arm to force it down. Launch Vehicle: Atlas-Centaur (AC-15 / Atlas The scoop on the arm was used numerous 3C no. 5903C / Centaur D-1A) times for picking up soil, digging trenches, Launch Date and Time: 7 January 1968 / and conducting at least sixteen surface- 06:30:00 UT bearing tests. Apart from taking 21,274 pho- Launch Site: ETR / launch complex 36A tographs (many of them in stereo), Surveyor Scientific Instruments: 7 also served as a target for Earth-based 1) imaging system lasers (of 1-watt power) to accurately 2) alpha-scattering instrument measure the distance between Earth and the 3) surface sampler Moon. Although it was successfully reacti- 4) footpad magnet vated after the lunar night, Surveyor 7 Results: Since Surveyors 1, 3, 5, and 6 success- finally shut down on 21 February 1968. In fully fulfilled requirements in support of total, the five successful Surveyors returned Apollo, NASA opted to use the last remaining more than 87,000 photos of the lunar surface Surveyor for a purely scientific mission out- and demonstrated the feasibility of soft- side of exploring a potential landing site for landing a spacecraft on the lunar surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Water on the Moon, III. Volatiles & Activity
    Water on The Moon, III. Volatiles & Activity Arlin Crotts (Columbia University) For centuries some scientists have argued that there is activity on the Moon (or water, as recounted in Parts I & II), while others have thought the Moon is simply a dead, inactive world. [1] The question comes in several forms: is there a detectable atmosphere? Does the surface of the Moon change? What causes interior seismic activity? From a more modern viewpoint, we now know that as much carbon monoxide as water was excavated during the LCROSS impact, as detailed in Part I, and a comparable amount of other volatiles were found. At one time the Moon outgassed prodigious amounts of water and hydrogen in volcanic fire fountains, but released similar amounts of volatile sulfur (or SO2), and presumably large amounts of carbon dioxide or monoxide, if theory is to be believed. So water on the Moon is associated with other gases. Astronomers have agreed for centuries that there is no firm evidence for “weather” on the Moon visible from Earth, and little evidence of thick atmosphere. [2] How would one detect the Moon’s atmosphere from Earth? An obvious means is atmospheric refraction. As you watch the Sun set, its image is displaced by Earth’s atmospheric refraction at the horizon from the position it would have if there were no atmosphere, by roughly 0.6 degree (a bit more than the Sun’s angular diameter). On the Moon, any atmosphere would cause an analogous effect for a star passing behind the Moon during an occultation (multiplied by two since the light travels both into and out of the lunar atmosphere).
    [Show full text]