DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding the African Standby Force, Rapid Deployment and Amani Africa II ISS Media Toolkit | 4 November 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Understanding the African Standby Force, Rapid Deployment and Amani Africa II ISS Media Toolkit | 4 November 2015 Understanding the African Standby Force, rapid deployment and Amani Africa II ISS Media Toolkit | 4 November 2015 Contents Frequently asked questions: .......................................................................................... 2 African Standby Force ................................................................................................ 2 African Capacity for Immediate Response to Crises .................................................. 4 Amani Africa II ............................................................................................................ 4 Analysis from the ISS ...................................................................................................... 5 Acronyms ....................................................................................................................... 6 Images ............................................................................................................................ 7 Get in touch ................................................................................................................... 7 Frequently asked questions: African Standby Force 1. What is the African Standby Force (ASF)? It is a multi-disciplinary, continental peacekeeping force comprised of military, police and civilian components, which are on standby in their regions of origin and available to the African Union for deployment in times of crisis. The ASF has been in development since May 2003, when the AU adopted the Policy Framework for the Establishment of the African Standby Force and the Military Staff Committee. 2. Where does the ASF fit into the overarching AU structures? The ASF is one element of the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA). The other four elements are: the Peace and Security Council; Panel of the Wise; Continental Early Warning System, and the African Union Peace Fund. 3. What is the ASF’s rapid deployment capability (RDC)? This is the rapid response force that can be deployed anywhere on the continent within 14 days in emergencies such as cases of war crimes, genocide and gross human rights abuses. The RDC is made up of 2 500 personnel per regional economic community/regional mechanism (REC/RM). 4. What is the mandate of the ASF? The functions of the ASF include: Intervening to restore peace and security Preventative deployment to prevent crises from escalating, stop the spread of violent conflict, or stem the resurgence of violence Conducting, observing and monitoring peacekeeping missions and support operations Providing humanitarian assistance in conflict areas 5. When is the ASF expected to be operational? January 2016 6. What is the current ASF structure? The current ASF structure is made up of 25 000 personnel: five regional, multidimensional (military, police and civilian) brigades of 5 000 personnel each. The brigades remain on standby in their host country until deployment. These brigades are based on three regional economic communities (RECs) and two regional mechanisms (RMs), namely the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS), the South African Development Community (SADC), the Eastern African Standby Force (EASF) and the North African Regional Capability (NARC). 2 7. In which cases, and how, would the ASF be deployed? The ASF will be able to intervene in cases of war crimes, genocide or crimes against humanity if an AU member state requests assistance or if the AU itself considers the situation serious enough. 2 RECs/RMs are largely responsible for generating the capabilities required for an operation. The REC/RM and the AU share deployment and management responsibilities. Deployments will start as regional operations before turning into larger, AU operations. 8. How will the ASF be funded? Funding arrangements are still to be finalised. In line with the goal for Africa to play a more prominent role in the continent’s peace operations, it is expected that the AU will contribute 25% of the funding for the ASF. The ASF will remain reliant on external (UN, EU and bilateral) support for 75% of funding. Competing domestic interests might complicate member state funding, as states might rather allocate such funds in combating local threats. 9. What potential challenges might hinder the rapid deployment of the ASF? Funding Slow decision making, whether at member state REC/RM, AU or UN level Lack of equipment and personnel Lack of training of contingents Potential delays given that approval might be sought from the EU and UNSC prior to deployment for the sake of international legitimacy A lack of political will Limited logistics and airlift capacity. (This is why an AU continental logistics base, to be established in Douala, Cameroon, is so important.) Lack of solid intelligence gathering Unevenness of REC/RM ability or pledged contributions 10. Where will the AU’s continental logistics base be located? The Cameroonian city of Douala is set to host the logistics base. Equipment will be stored here, however, the ultimate power remains at the AU headquarters in Addis Ababa. 11. Does Africa have the troops and experience needed for the ASF to be successful? In the past decade, AU has already deployed peace support operations to 11 countries. African countries are also major contributors to UN peace operations. Of all the operations deployed to date, those in Mali and the Central African Republic most closely resembled the ASF model, where the AU worked with a region (ECOWAS and ECCAS respectively) to plan and deploy an operation. Africa contributes the majority of troops used in UN peacekeeping missions. In 2013, about 35 000 African peacekeepers had participated in UN missions. 3 The number of planned ASF troops (five regional brigades of 5 000 troops each) has therefore already been achieved. African Capacity for Immediate Response to Crises 12. What is the African Capacity for Immediate Response to Crises (ACIRC)? ACIRC was established in 2013 to provide the continent with a rapid deployment capability ahead of ASF’s deadline to become operational by 2015. It can therefore be described as a stopgap measure. ACIRC will be merged into the ASF’s Rapid Deployment Capability. 13. Has ACIRC been deployed before? No. 14. How do the ASF and ACIRC relate to one another? ACIRC and the ASF have similar aims but differ with regard to funding, mandate and how they would deploy. The activities of the ASF, once functional, will be guided by its mandate, which focuses on conflict prevention and peacebuilding. The ACIRC model, on the other hand, is based on experiences such as in the CAR and Mali and therefore allows for peace enforcement. ACIRC works directly through the AU, whereas the ASF works through regional economic communities. ACIRC is self-funded and based on the voluntary participation of member states, whereas the ASF requires significant AU funding and must coordinate large numbers of member states. ACIRC is deployed at the behest of a lead country with AU approval, whereas the ASF is deployed by the AU itself with approval from regional economic communities. This makes ACIRC potentially more agile, but with less authority. Whether, and how, the ASF and ACIRC should merge must be clarified following the conclusion of the Amani Africa II field exercise. Amani Africa II 15. What is Amani Africa II? The Amani Africa II field training exercise at the SA Army Combat Training Centre in Lohatlha, South Africa from 18 October – 5 November 2015 is aimed at testing the operational readiness of the ASF and its Rapid Deployment Capability. The field exercise is part of a process and not an end in itself. The first phase of the field exercise focuses on rapid deployment. In the second phase, participants will test the deployment of a multi-dimensional PSO. 4 The Amani Africa II cycle is a collaboration between the AU and EU whereby, as part of the ongoing strategic partnership between the two organisations, training and exercises will test the decision-making structures, management and deployment of the African Standby Force (ASF) at the continental level. The Amani Africa II cycle is mainly funded through the EU's African Peace Facility. 16. Who is participating in the Amani Africa II field exercise? Some 5 400 representatives from defence and police forces of member states. The major contributors are Angola, Botswana, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland Zambia and Zimbabwe. Other contributing countries will be Algeria, Burundi, Egypt, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Rwanda and Uganda. 17. What are the envisaged outcomes of Amani Africa II field exercise? Critical gaps and challenges in the operational readiness of the ASF must be identified. Clarity must be reached on how the ASF and ACIRC can be integrated. The command, control and communication required on the tactical, operational and strategic levels will be evaluated, and the spotlight must be turned to whether best practices had been applied, and whether the outcomes are in line with standardised operational procedures. Analysis from the ISS African Standby Force: how the AU can get it right Author: Annette Leijenaar, Division Head, Conflict Management and Peacebuilding, ISS Published in ISS Today: 30 October 2015 The African Standby Force needs resources, resources, resources ISS PSC Report - Published 29 October 2015 The African Standby Force beyond 2015: ideals versus realities
Load more

Recommended publications
  • African Standby Force Training Policy
    AFRICAN STANDBY FORCE Training Policy AFRICAN STANDBY FORCE TRAINING POLICY Issue: Final Draft November 2006 (PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK) Issue: Final Draft November 2006 1 AFRICAN STANDBY FORCE TRAINING POLICY PREAMBLE 1. To curb the various conflicts which destabilize Africa and hinder the efforts made by African countries in the pursuit of their political and socio-economic objectives, the Conference of Heads of State and Government (CHSG) of Member States of the Organization of African Unity (OAU) adopted in 1993 the Declaration of Cairo which established the OAU Mechanism for the Prevention, Management and Resolution of Conflicts on the Continent. 2. In 2002 in Durban, the CHSG adopted the Constitutive Act of the African Union, which established the Peace and Security Council (PSC)(Art 5-2), to replace the Central Organ of the OAU Mechanism. 3. During their 3rd meeting held in Addis-Ababa, Ethiopia, on 15 and 16 May 2003, the African Chiefs of Defence Staff (ACDS) adopted a document entitled “The Policy Framework Document on the Establishment of the African Standby Force (ASF) and of the Military Staff Committee (MSC)”. 4. The recommendations of this important meeting were examined in an in-depth manner, at the 3rd extraordinary session of the Executive Council/Council of Ministers held at Sun City, South Africa, from 22 to 24 May 2003. The Executive Council/ Council of Ministers had, inter alia, recommended regular consultations in order to consolidate the proposals contained in the "Framework Document “adopted by the African Chiefs of Defence Staff. 5. Subsequently, the African Union Summit (AU) held in 2003 in Maputo, Mozambique, adopted Decision AU/DEC.16 (II) made by the Assembly and which, inter alia, took note of the Framework Document for the setting-up of the ASF and of the Military Staff Committee (MSC).
    [Show full text]
  • The African Standby Force, the African Capacity for Immediate Response to Crises, and the Future of Rapid Reaction Forces in Africa
    African Security, 8:56–73, 2015 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1939-2206 print / 1939-2214 online DOI: 10.1080/19392206.2015.998543 Complements or Competitors? The African Standby Force, the African Capacity for Immediate Response to Crises, and the Future of Rapid Reaction Forces in Africa Jason Warner Department of African/African American Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA ABSTRACT. In May 2013 the African Union proposed the creation of an institu- tional framework for a new continental rapid-response force called the African Capacity for Immediate Response to Crises. While the creation of the rapid-response force has offered hope as an antidote to the recent continental inaction in the face of insurgen- cies in places like Mali in 2013, it has undergone critical scrutiny because it seemingly duplicates—and thus arguably draws resources away from—a similar mechanism, the African Standby Force, which has been in development by the African Union and regional communities since 2003. A contemporary debate is thus emerging: Certain observers favor the African Capacity for Immediate Response to Crises’ new, ad-hoc, slim, and voluntary approach to collective security, while others argue that the African Standby Force’s preexisting—though underdeveloped—regionally based, comprehen- sive, and institutionalized framework should receive top priority. This article offers overviews of both institutions and the various debates currently surrounding them. In the main, it argues that while critiques that the African Capacity for Immediate Response to Crises is duplicative of the African Standby Force are superficially cogent, deeper analysis shows that this is not the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Eastern Africa Standby Force a Regional Mechanism Without a Political Home
    Understanding the Eastern Africa Standby Force A regional mechanism without a political home By Sophie Desmidt & Volker Hauck* This background paper is part of a series on the Political Economy Dynamics of Regional Organisations (PEDRO). It was prepared in March 2017. In line with ECDPM's mission to inform and facilitate EU-Africa policy dialogue, and financed by the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, BMZ, the studies analyse key policy areas of seventeen regional organisations in Sub-Saharan Africa. In doing so they address three broad questions: What is the political traction of the organisations around different policy areas? What are the key member state interests in the regional agenda? What are the areas with most future traction for regional organisations to promote cooperation and integration around specific areas? The studies aim to advance thinking on how regional policies play out in practice, and ways to promote politically feasible and adaptive approaches to regional cooperation and integration. Further information can be found at www.ecdpm.org/pedro. * Author contacts: Sophie Desmidt ([email protected]) and Volker Hauck ([email protected]). Project team leader: Bruce Byiers ([email protected]). Acknowledgements We would like to thank all interviewees who made their time available to respond to our questions. Particular thanks goes to Silke Hampson, former GIZ Technical Assistant to the EASF Secretariat, who helped to us to find our way into this assessment. We would also like to thank our colleagues Jan Vanheukelom and Bruce Byiers for valuable comments shared. 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 1 Table of Contents 2 List of Acronyms 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The African Standby Force an Update on Progress Jakkie Cilliers
    The African Standby Force An update on progress Jakkie Cilliers ISS Paper 160 • March 2008 Price: R15.00 In order to enable the Peace and Security Council partner on the Training for Peace project through which [to] perform its responsibilities with respect to it has been able to provide civilian police with training the deployment of peace support missions and for more than a decade. This paper accordingly draws interventions … an African Standby Force shall extensively on various source documents developed be established. Such Force shall be composed at the level of the AU and regions. It is, however, not of standby multidisciplinary contingents, an official report. Some documents are still in draft with civilian and military components in form and/or incomplete and the analysis is necessarily their countries of origin and ready for rapid limited to those documents made available to the ISS, deployment at appropriate notice. and interviews that the Institute was able to conduct. This is therefore as much a commentary as an update (PSC protocol, art 13.1) on the remarkable progress that has been achieved in recent years on a massively ambitious scheme to Introduction enable Africa to play a greater role in and assume greater responsibility for Much has happened since mid 2005 The protocol and continental conflict management. when the Institute published its first account of the progress that had been ASF demonstrate The ASF concept achieved with the establishment of the a serious political African Standby Force (ASF) (Cilliers & During May 2003 the African Chiefs of Malan 2005). This paper provides an commitment to the Defence and Security (ACDS) adopted a update and commentary on subsequent conflict prevention document entitled ‘The policy framework progress.
    [Show full text]
  • The African Standby Force of the African Union Ambitious Plans, Wide Regional Disparities: an Intermediate Appraisal
    SWP Research Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Wolf Kinzel The African Standby Force of the African Union Ambitious Plans, Wide Regional Disparities: An Intermediate Appraisal RP 8 November 2008 Berlin All rights reserved. © Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2008 This Research Paper reflects solely the author’s view. SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Ludwigkirchplatz 3−4 10719 Berlin Germany Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org [email protected] ISSN 1863-1053 Translation by: Language Service, Federal Ministry of Defence (English version of SWP-Studie 21/2008) Table of Contents 5 Problems and Recommendations 7 The Phased Security Architecture of the African Union 9 Common African Defense and Security Policy 10 Panel of the Wise (POW) 10 Continental Early Warning System (CEWS) 10 African Standby Force (ASF) 13 Regional Implementation 13 West Africa 16 Southern Africa 18 Horn of Africa and East Africa 19 North Africa 21 Central Africa 21 The Schedule until 2010 23 Conclusion 23 Funding 25 Conceptual and Equipment Deficiencies 26 Political Will 27 Recommendations 30 Acronyms and Abbreviations Commander Wolf Kinzel is a research officer working on the European and Atlantic Security Division “There are many tasks which United Nations peace- keeping forces should not be asked to undertake, and many places they should not go. But when the United Nations does send its forces to uphold the peace, they must be prepared to confront the lingering forces of war and violence with the ability and determination to defeat them.” Lakhdar Brahimi, Report of the Panel on the United Nations Peace Operations, 2000 (Brahimi Report) Problems and Recommendations The African Standby Force of the African Union Ambitious Plans, Wide Regional Disparities: An Intermediate Appraisal By adopting the joint EU-Africa Strategy on 15 Decem- ber 2005, the European Union set course for a com- prehensive partnership with the African continent.
    [Show full text]
  • The African Standby Force, Genocide, and International Relations Theory
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 6 Issue 2 Article 4 August 2011 The African Standby Force, Genocide, and International Relations Theory Stephen Burgess Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation Burgess, Stephen (2011) "The African Standby Force, Genocide, and International Relations Theory," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 6: Iss. 2: Article 4. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol6/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The African Standby Force, Genocide, and International Relations Theory Stephen Burgess1 US Air War College In launching the African Standby Force (ASF), African leaders over-promised to stop genocide, given their lack of political will, the weak capacity of their states, and the weak military capability of the Force’s subregional brigades. The explana- tion lies in a combination of South African idealism and determination to exert continental leadership and the desire of African leaders to sustain or increase aid to their under-resourced militaries. South Africa does not have the power or resources necessary to supply sufficient public goods to make the ASF fully func- tional and capable of fulfilling all tasks. African leaders promised to stop genocide with the calculation that no one with sanctioning power would challenge them. Burden shifting by the United States and other major powers was such that African leaders expected to be rewarded with increased aid flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Protocol for the Establishment of the Eastern Africa Standby Brigade (Easbrig)
    Page 1 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY ON DEVELOPMENT (IGAD) DRAFT PROTOCOL FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE EASTERN AFRICA STANDBY BRIGADE (EASBRIG) Jinja, Uganda 13-17th February 2004 Coordinating Office: IGAD Secretariat, P.O. Box 2653, Djibouti, Republic of Djibouti Tel. (253) 354050; Fax: (253) 356994/356284; E-mail: [email protected] 1 Page 2 DRAFT PROTOCOL ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE EASTERN AFRICA STANDBY BRIGADE We, the Member States of the Eastern Africa Region The Republic of Comoros The Republic of Djibouti The State of Eritrea The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia The Republic of Kenya The Republic of Madagascar The Republic of Mauritius The Republic of Rwanda The Republic of Seychelles The Republic of Somalia The Republic of the Sudan The United Republic of Tanzania The Republic of Uganda Recalling the principles and objectives enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, the Constitutive Act of the African Union, the Treaty establishing the African Economic Community and the Agreement Establishing the Inter-Governmental Authority on Development; Noting the commitment by Member States to act collectively to preserve peace, security and stability, which are essential prerequisites for economic development and social progress; 2 Page 3 Bearing in mind that Chapter VIII of the UN Charter recognized the role of regional arrangements in dealing with such matters relating to the maintenance of international peace and security as are appropriate for regional action; Reaffirming the primary responsibility of the UN Security Council
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of the Eastern Africa Standby Force
    UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI INSTITUTE OF DIPLOMACY AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (IDIS) THE ROLE OF AFRICA STANDBY FORCE IN SECURING AFRICA: A CASE OF THE EASTERN AFRICA STANDBY FORCE BY MAKATO LOISE MWIKALI R50/88442/2016 SUPERVISOR PROF MARIA NZOMO A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE AWARD OF MASTER OF ARTS IN INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI DECEMBER 2018 i DECLARATION I, Loise Makato, hereby declare that this research project is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other University. Signed……………………………………… Date…………………………. MAKATO LOISE MWIKALI R50/88442/2016 This project has been submitted for examination with my approval as the University Supervisor; Signed……………………………………. Date……………………………. PRO. MARIA NZOMO University Supervisor Institute of Diplomacy and International Studies University of Nairobi ii DEDICATION I dedicate this study to my sons Ryan Muoki, Eythan Makato &Dylan Kimonyi (RED) and in a very special way to my husband Kenneth Mule. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to thank the Almighty God for giving me the zeal, privilege, wisdom and guidance to conduct this study. I pay tribute to my family, my sons who endured my absence most of the evenings and weekends over the past year, at times accompanying me to school. Mygood- hearted husbandKenneth Mule who enabled my study as a moral and financial backer deserves a special mention in this regard. Alex Makato and Victorine Kyalo, your support was incomparable, thank you. In Addition, I want to thank my supervisor Professor Maria Nzomo for her unsurpassed guidance and dedication that allowed for a conducive academic process that allowed completion of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • African Standby Force: a Song of Sorrow
    International Journal of History and Cultural Studies (IJHCS) Volume 3, Issue 3, 2017, PP 1-9 ISSN 2454-7646 (Print) & ISSN 2454-7654 (Online) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2454-7654.0303001 www.arcjournals.org African Standby Force: A Song of Sorrow Dr Ebere R Adigbuo Senior Lecturer, Department of History and International Studies, PMB 1, Abraka Delta State University, Abraka Nigeria Abstract: Wars historically, have in no small measure, shaped human existence. Such issues like state formaton, boundary adjustments and consolidation, ethnicity, identity definitions and business relations have been influenced by wars. Africa disproportionately accounts up to forty percent of global conflicts. Although these conflicts have their devastating effects, they have nonetheless shaped the historical evolution of the continent. The methods adopted in resolving such conflicts are crucial to advancing knowledge about the continent. It is against this backdrop that the African Standby force is introduced. The need to establish an African military force was first advanced by the Nkrumah led Casablanca group, even before the birth of the Organization of African Unity in 1963. Though most of the African States that established the OAU that year rejected the idea of a continental military force, yet in 2002, the same states under the African Union (AU) voted for an African Standby Force for the purpose of a military intervention in the domestic affairs of member states in circumstances of genocide and war crimes. This study therefore undertakes to explain the rationale for the African Standby Force in implementing the AU’s right of intervention and to appraise the prospects and challenges for the African Standby Force in implementing such right.
    [Show full text]
  • AU Peace Security FOI 2016 Ed 161003
    African Union (AU) Peace and Security Architecture As part of the African Union eort to promote peace and security AU Facts in Africa, an African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA) has been designed. NARC Peace and Security Architecture The African Union consists of 54 out of 55 states on the African continent. The architecture consists of several important elements for conict prevention At the center of the African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA) is the AU Peace and Security Council, located at AU Marocco is not a member state but has declared its wish to join the organization. and post-conict reconstruction support. This illustration (2016 edition) aims North African Regional Capability headquarters in Addis Ababa. The Council is modeled on the UN Security Council and consists of 15 member states, rotating Members: Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Mauritania, Tunisia. on a regional basis. There are no permanent members and no veto rights. The Council has appointed a Commissioner of Peace The decision to establish an African Union was taken by the Organization of to present an overview of the main building blocks of APSA as well as and Security who leads the Department of Peace and Security, which runs the everyday management of APSA. African Unity (OAU) Assembly of Heads of State and Government in 1999. The relevant facts and gures concerning AU Planning element: Tripoli (Libya) AU was inaugurated in July 2002. peace and security. It is published by the North African Standby Force (NASF) Continental Early Peace Fund Panel of the Wise The Peace Fund is one of the The African Peace and Security Architecture is underpinned by two pillars: the Swedish Defence Research Agency Not yet operational Warning PSC Protocol (2002) establishing the Peace and Security Council, and the System operational tools to nance peace and Common African Defence and Security Policy (CADSP) (2004), which provides (FOI)in an eort to promote NARC is a special mechanism that has been developed for security activities of the AU.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civilian Dimension of the African Standby Force
    THE CIVILIAN DIMENSION OF THE AFRICAN STANDBY FORCE Peace Support Operations Division of the African Union Commission Edited by Cedric de Coning and Yvonne Kasumba The recommendations and policies contained in this book have been generated through a number of initiatives aimed at developing the civilian dimension of the African Standby Force (ASF) between 2006 and 2010. These initiatives have been led by the Peace Support Operations Division of the of the African Union (AU) Commission, with the support of Regional Economic Communities/Regional Mechanisms, AU Member States, members of the African Peace Support Trainers’ Association (APSTA), with civil society and international partners. This edited volume has been published by the Peace Support Operations Division of the African Union with support from the African Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes (ACCORD), under the auspices of the Norwegian funded Training for Peace (TfP) in Africa Programme. Copyright © AU & ACCORD 2010 ISBN: 978-0-620-47402-3 African Union Commission P O Box 3243 Addis Ababa Ethiopia Tel: +251 113 724724 Fax: +251 113 206592 Web: <www.africanunion.org> Email : [email protected] Published by: ACCORD 2 Golf Course Drive Mount Edgecombe 4300 South Africa Web: <www.accord.org.za> Phone: +27 31 502 3908 Fax: +27 31 502 4160 Email: [email protected] Design and Layout: Immins Naudé Printed by: Colour Planet, Durban THE CIVILIAN DIMENSION OF THE AFRICAN STANDBY FORCE 3 Table of Contents Acronyms 4 Foreword 7 Sivuyile Bam Introduction 8 Cedric de Coning 1. An Overview of the African Standby Force (ASF) 10 Yvonne Kasumba and Charles Debrah 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The African Standby Force: an Element of Prospective Multilevel Security Governance
    The African Standby Force: An Element of Prospective Multilevel Security Governance Olaf Bachmann Abstract This article examines the African Standby Force (ASF), an African-led mechanism for crisis management and peace consolidation in Africa, and its potential contribution to multilayered security governance. It analyses the ASF project, which has gone through many phases of redefinition since it was conceived in the late 1990s and elaborates on the inability of African stakeholders to settle on a clear concept, setting themselves ever more ambitious goals. International partners simultaneously suffer from, and contribute to, this state of affairs as their support too often responds to national or institutional interests. The ASF is also burdened by the lack of ownership by African countries and institutions. Only if AU member states make a conscious effort to increase their political, conceptual and especially, financial, stake in the ASF will they be able to credibly demonstrate that it is not an entirely foreign-mastered project, but a real ‘African solution to African problems’. 1 Introduction ‘Protocol Relating to the Establishment of the External donors have invested a great deal in the Peace and Security Council of the African Union’ African Peace and Security Architecture (APSA) in (PSC Protocol), in July 2002. With that Protocol, efforts to make it a viable multilateral instrument. Africa endowed itself with ‘a standing decision- Significant questions remain, however: is APSA making organ for the prevention, management and meant to create and refine additional levels of resolution of conflicts’ (Article 2.1, African Union governance? If so, how will the different levels 2002: 4).
    [Show full text]