DOCSLIB.ORG

Service Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Service Assessment Service Assessment The Historic Tornadoes of April 2011 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service Silver Spring, Maryland Cover Photographs: Tornado tracks and damage pictures from eastern Mississippi, central and northern Alabama, and northern Georgia. Map: National Severe Storms Laboratory. Photos: NWS Birmingham, AL; NWS Huntsville, AL; NWS Peachtree City, GA; Richard Okulski; Kevin Scharfenberg; Gary Woodall ii Service Assessment The Historic Tornadoes of April 2011 December 2011 National Weather Service John L. Hayes, Assistant Administrator for Weather Services iii Table of Contents Page Preface……………………………………………………………………………….…..……… iv Service Assessment Team…………………………………………………………….………... viii Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………… 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. NWS Mission ................................................................................................................. 3 1.2. Purpose of Assessment Report ....................................................................................... 3 1.3. Methodology .................................................................................................................. 3 2. Summary of Tornadoes and Damages ...................................................................................... 5 3. Summary of Meteorological Conditions ................................................................................... 6 4. Facts, Findings, Recommendations, and Best Practices ......................................................... 10 4.1.1. Pre-Season Awareness Activities .................................................................... 10 4.1.2. Severe Weather Awareness Weeks .................................................................. 10 4.1.3. Media Outreach ............................................................................................... 10 4.1.4. SKYWARN Spotter Training ....................................................................... 10 4.1.5. StormReady Program .................................................................................... 11 4.1.6. Emergency Management ................................................................................ 11 4.1.7. School Administrators ..................................................................................... 11 4.1.8. Adopt-a-County .............................................................................................. 12 4.1.9. Emergency Management Web Briefing Pages ................................................ 12 4.2. Situational Awareness of WFOs ................................................................................... 12 4.3. Internal WFO Operations and Planning ....................................................................... 13 4.4. Key Operational Systems ............................................................................................. 14 4.4.1. Weather Surveillance Radar - 1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) .............................. 14 4.4.2. Backup Operations .......................................................................................... 15 4.4.3. AWIPS ............................................................................................................ 15 4.4.4. NWR ............................................................................................................... 16 4.5. WFO Tornado Products and Services .......................................................................... 17 4.6. Products and Services by SPC ..................................................................................... 20 4.7. Decision Support and External Communication .......................................................... 22 4.7.1. Pre-Warning Services ...................................................................................... 22 4.7.2. Webinars.......................................................................................................... 23 4.7.3. Web Graphics .................................................................................................. 24 4.7.4. Multimedia Web Briefings .............................................................................. 25 4.7.5. NWSChat ........................................................................................................ 25 4.7.6. Direct Contacts and Emails ............................................................................. 26 4.7.7. Standard Warning Products ............................................................................. 26 4.7.8. Interactive NWS (iNWS) ................................................................................ 26 4.8. Dissemination ............................................................................................................... 26 4.9. Social Media................................................................................................................. 27 4.10. Operations and Responses of External Partners .......................................................... 28 4.10.1. Emergency Managers ...................................................................................... 28 v 4.10.2. School Officials ............................................................................................... 29 4.10.3. Media .............................................................................................................. 29 4.11. Societal Impacts and Public Response ......................................................................... 29 4.11.1. Receiving Warning Information ...................................................................... 29 4.11.1.1. Importance of Multiple Warning Sources ...................................... 29 4.11.1.2. Varied Access to Dissemination Sources ........................................ 30 4.11.2. Message Comprehension ................................................................................ 30 4.11.2.1. Unclear Communication of Increased Certainty and Intensity ...... 31 4.11.2.2. Varying Siren Policies .................................................................... 31 4.11.2.3. Language Barriers .......................................................................... 32 4.11.2.4. Multiple Tornadoes ......................................................................... 32 4.11.3. Confirmation ................................................................................................... 32 4.11.3.1. Difficulties with Visual Confirmation ............................................ 32 4.11.4. Personalization ................................................................................................ 33 4.11.4.1. Communicating Geographic Specificity ........................................ 33 4.11.4.2. The False Alarm Effect ................................................................... 33 4.11.4.3. Altering Behavior ........................................................................... 34 4.11.4.4. Weather Myths as a Barrier to Personalizing the Threat ................ 35 4.11.5. Risk Reduction and Protective Action Behavior ............................................ 35 4.11.5.1. Unclear Communication of Protective Action Options .................. 35 4.11.5.2. Lack of Availability of Shelters and Safe Rooms ........................... 36 4.11.5.3. Lack of Awareness of Public Shelter Options ................................ 37 4.11.6. Public Response Summary ............................................................................. 37 4.12. Post-Event Activities and Support ............................................................................... 38 4.12.1. WFO Staff ....................................................................................................... 38 4.12.2. Southern Region Operations Center ............................................................... 39 4.12.3. Mapping of Tornado Tracks ............................................................................ 39 4.12.4. Damage Surveys ............................................................................................. 41 4.12.5. Post-Event Agency Coordination .................................................................... 42 5. Success Stories Resulting from NWS Products/Services ....................................................... 43 Appendices Acroynms……………………………………………………………………….………..…… A-1 Findings, Recommendations, and Best Practices………………………………..……………. B-1 Social Science Methodology and Response Model…………………………………………... C-1 April 22, 2011, St. Louis Metropolitan Area Tornado Event……………………………….… D-1 NWS Eastern Region Event Review NC/SC/VA U.S. Tornado Outbreak……………….…… E-1 vi Figures Figure 1: Tornado tracks from the April 27, 2011, tornado outbreak. Tornado reports are from 12 a.m. April 27 through 12 a.m. April 28. ................................................... 5 Figure 2: Radar images of early morning storm complex: left, Jackson, MS; right, Birmingham, AL, 4:59 a.m. Central Daylight Time (CDT), April 27, 2011. .............. 6 Figure 3: Composite weather analysis for 1200 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) (7 a.m. CDT), April 27, 2011 (courtesy of Greg Carbin, SPC) .................................. 7 Figure 4: Radar mosaic from 1130 UTC (6:30 a.m. CDT), April 27, 2011 ............................... 8 Figure 5: Shown is infrared satellite image
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Improving Tornado Warnings: from Observation to Forecast
    Improving Tornado Warnings: from Observation to Forecast John T. Snow Regents’ Professor of Meteorology Dean Emeritus, College of Atmospheric and Geographic Sciences, The University of Oklahoma Major contributions from: Dr. Russel Schneider –NOAA Storm Prediction Center Dr. David Stensrud – NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory Dr. Ming Xue –Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, University of Oklahoma Dr. Lou Wicker –NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory Hazards Caucus Alliance Briefing Tornadoes: Understanding how they develop and providing early warning 10:30 am – 11:30 am, Wednesday, 21 July 2010 Senate Capitol Visitors Center 212 Each Year: ~1,500 tornadoes touch down in the United States, causing over 80 deaths, 100s of injuries, and an estimated $1.1 billion in damages Statistics from NOAA Storm Prediction Center Supercell –A long‐lived rotating thunderstorm the primary type of thunderstorm producing strong and violent tornadoes Present Warning System: Warn on Detection • A Warning is the culmination of information developed and distributed over the preceding days sequence of day‐by‐day forecasts identifies an area of high threat •On the day, storm spotters deployed; radars monitor formation, growth of thunderstorms • Appearance of distinct cloud or radar echo features tornado has formed or is about to do so Warning is generated, distributed Present Warning System: Warn on Detection Radar at 2100 CST Radar at 2130 CST with Warning Thunderstorms are monitored using radar A warning is issued based on the detected and
    [Show full text]
  • 14B.6 ESTIMATED CONVECTIVE WINDS: RELIABILITY and EFFECTS on SEVERE-STORM CLIMATOLOGY
    14B.6 ESTIMATED CONVECTIVE WINDS: RELIABILITY and EFFECTS on SEVERE-STORM CLIMATOLOGY Roger Edwards1 NWS Storm Prediction Center, Norman, OK Gregory W. Carbin NWS Weather Prediction Center, College Park, MD 1. BACKGROUND In 2006, NCDC (now NCEI) Storm Data, from By definition, convectively produced surface winds which the SPC database is directly derived, began to ≥50 kt (58 mph, 26m s–1) in the U.S. are classified as record whether gust reports were measured by an severe, whether measured or estimated. Other wind instrument or estimated. Formats before and after reports that can verify warnings and appear in the this change are exemplified in Fig. 1. Storm Data Storm Prediction Center (SPC) severe-weather contains default entries of “Thunderstorm Wind” database (Schaefer and Edwards 1999) include followed by values in parentheses with an acronym assorted forms of convective wind damage to specifying whether a gust was measured (MG) or structures and trees. Though the “wind” portion of the estimated (EG), along with the measured and SPC dataset includes both damage reports and estimated “sustained” convective wind categories (MS specific gust values, this study only encompasses the and ES respectively). MGs from standard ASOS and latter (whether or not damage was documented to AWOS observation sites are available independently accompany any given gust). For clarity, “convective prior to 2006 and have been analyzed in previous gusts” refer to all gusts in the database, regardless of studies [e.g., the Smith et al. (2013) climatology and whether thunder specifically was associated with any mapping]; however specific categorization of EGs and given report.
    [Show full text]
  • 5-Day Weather Outlook 04.23.21
    Friday, April 23, 2021 5-Day Statewide Weather Outlook No Threat Low Threat Moderate Threat High Threat Damaging Flash Coastal Day Lightning Tornado Wildfire Fog Rip Currents Wind/Hail Flooding Flooding Panhandle Western Far NW FL Far NW West Coast Fri South FL (overnight) Panhandle W Panhandle Florida Elsewhere North FL Panhandle & Sat Central FL North Florida North Florida South FL Statewide Big Bend South FL Northeast FL Sun South FL Statewide & Peninsula Panhandle Mon South FL Elsewhere Southeast Tue South FL Statewide Florida Severe Weather Hazard Breakdown for Saturday: Tornadoes (left), Damaging Winds (center), Large Hail (right) Maximum Wind Gusts through Saturday Afternoon Forecast Rainfall Totals Through Tuesday Night FDEM Statewide 5-Day Weather Outlook 04.23.21 …Potentially Significant Severe Weather Event for North Florida on Saturday…Two Rounds of Severe Weather Possible Across North Florida…Windy Outside of Storms in North Florida…Hot with Isolated Showers and Storms in the Peninsula this Weekend…Minor Coastal Flooding Possible in Southeast Florida Next Week… Friday - Saturday: A warm front over the Gulf of Mexico tonight will lift northward through the Panhandle and Big Bend Saturday morning. This brings the first round of thunderstorms into the Panhandle late tonight. The Storm Prediction Center has outlined the western Panhandle in a Marginal to Slight Risk of severe weather tonight (level 1-2 of 5). Damaging winds up to 60 mph and isolated tornadoes will be the main threat, mainly after 2 AM CT. On Saturday, the first complex of storms will be rolling across southern Alabama and southern Georgia in the morning and afternoon hours, clipping areas north of I-10 in Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Tornadoes & Funnel Clouds Fake Tornado
    NOAA’s National Weather Service Basic Concepts of Severe Storm Spotting 2009 – Rusty Kapela Milwaukee/Sullivan weather.gov/milwaukee Housekeeping Duties • How many new spotters? - if this is your first spotter class & you intend to be a spotter – please raise your hands. • A basic spotter class slide set & an advanced spotter slide set can be found on the Storm Spotter Page on the Milwaukee/Sullivan web site (handout). • Utilize search engines and You Tube to find storm videos and other material. Class Agenda • 1) Why we are here • 2) National Weather Service Structure & Role • 3) Role of Spotters • 4) Types of reports needed from spotters • 5) Thunderstorm structure • 6) Shelf clouds & rotating wall clouds • 7) You earn your “Learner’s Permit” Thunderstorm Structure Those two cloud features you were wondering about… Storm Movement Shelf Cloud Rotating Wall Cloud Rain, Hail, Downburst winds Tornadoes & Funnel Clouds Fake Tornado It’s not rotating & no damage! Let’s Get Started! Video Why are we here? Parsons Manufacturing 120-140 employees inside July 13, 2004 Roanoke, IL Storm shelters F4 Tornado – no injuries or deaths. They have trained spotters with 2-way radios Why Are We Here? National Weather Service’s role – Issue warnings & provide training Spotter’s role – Provide ground-truth reports and observations We need (more) spotters!! National Weather Service Structure & Role • Federal Government • Department of Commerce • National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration • National Weather Service 122 Field Offices, 6 Regional, 13 River Forecast Centers, Headquarters, other specialty centers Mission – issue forecasts and warnings to minimize the loss of life & property National Weather Service Forecast Office - Milwaukee/Sullivan Watch/Warning responsibility for 20 counties in southeast and south- central Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Tornadoes in the Gulf Coast States
    4.2 COOL SEASON SIGNIFICANT (F2-F5) TORNADOES IN THE GULF COAST STATES Jared L. Guyer and David A. Imy NOAA/NWS Storm Prediction Center, Norman, Oklahoma Amanda Kis University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin Kar’retta Venable Jackson State University, Jackson, Mississippi 1. INTRODUCTION Tornadoes pose a significant severe weather 300 mb winds and geopotential heights; 500 mb winds, threat during the cool season in the Gulf Coast states. geopotential heights, temperature, and absolute Galway and Pearson (1981) found that 68% of all vorticity; 700 mb winds, geopotential heights, and December through February tornadoes in the United temperature; 850 mb winds, geopotential heights, and States occur in the Gulf Coast/Southeast states. They temperature; precipitable water, surface temperature also noted that long track tornadoes in winter outbreaks and dewpoint, and MSLP; 0-3 km AGL helicity; and accounted for a higher percentage of deaths compared lowest 180 mb Most Unstable CAPE (MUCAPE). Aside to long track spring outbreak tornadoes. While strong from direct utilization for this study, the NARR maps wind fields are often present in association with dynamic were also compiled and organized to serve as an shortwave troughs that impact the region, uncertainty analog reference for operational forecasters. regarding low-level moisture and atmospheric instability can make forecasting such events quite challenging for operational forecasters (Vescio and Thompson 1993). The purpose of this study is to help identify a set of patterns, parameters, and conditions that are commonly associated with the development of cool season tornadoes in the Gulf Coast States, with a focus on significant (F2 and greater) tornadoes.
    [Show full text]
  • NWS Storm Prediction Center SPC 24X7 Operations
    3/6/2019 NWS Storm Prediction Center FACETs will enable ... • Robust quantification of the weather hazard risk Initial realizations of the FACETs Vision: Real- • Better individual and group decision making • Based on individual needs …through both NWS & the private sector time tools and information for severe weather • Consistent communication and DSS, commensurate to decision making risk • Rigorous quantification of potential impacts Dr. Russell S. Schneider Director, NOAA-NWS Storm Prediction Center 3 March 2019 National Tornado Summit – Public Sheltering Workshop NOAA NWS Storm Prediction Center www.spc.noaa.gov • Forecast tornadoes, thunderstorms, and wildfires nationwide • Forecast information from 8 days to a few minutes in advance • World class team engaged with the research community • Partner with over 120 local National Weather Service offices Current: Forecast & Warning Continuum SPC 24x7 Operations Information Void(s) Outlooks Watches Warnings Event Time Days Hours Minutes Space Regional State Local Uncertainty FACETs: Toward a true continuum optimal for the pace of emergency decision making 1 3/6/2019 Tornado Watch SPC Severe Weather Outlooks Alerting messages issued to the public through media partners SPC Forecaster collaborating on watch characteristics with local NWS offices to communicate the forecast tornado threat to the Public Issued since the early 1950’s SPC Lead Forecaster SPC Lead Forecaster National Experience Average National Experience: 10 years as Lead; almost 20 overall NWS Local Forecast Office Partners
    [Show full text]
  • John Hart Storm Prediction Center, Norman, OK
    John Hart Storm Prediction Center, Norman, OK 7th European Conference on Severe Storms, Helsinki, Finland – Friday June 7th, 2013 SPC Overview: US Naonal Weather Service 122 Local Weather Forecast Offices Ususally about 12 meteoroloGists who work rotating shifts. Very busy with daily forecast tasks (public/aviation forecasts, etc). Limited severe weather experience, even if they work in an active office. Image source: Steve M., Minnesota ClimatoloGy Working Group SPC Overview: US Storm Predic/on Center • Focus on severe storms. • Second set of eyes for the local offices. • Consistent overview of severe storm threat. • HIGH EXPERIENCE LEVELS Forecasts for entire US • Very competitive to join staff (except Alaska and Hawaii) • Stable staff • Few people leave before retirement • No competition with local offices • SPC does not issue warnings • Easy collaboration with local offices Our job is to help the local offices, not compete or overshadow. Image source: Steve M., Minnesota ClimatoloGy Working Group SPC Overview: US Storm Predic/on Center • Usually four forecasters on shift • Lead Forecaster • 2 mesoscale forecasters • 1 outlook forecaster • Lead Forecaster • Shift supervisor • Makes final call on all products • Issues watches • Promoted from mesoscale/outlook forecaster ranks • Mesoscale Forecaster • Focuses on 0-6 hour forecasts • Writes mesoscale discussions • Outlook Forecaster • Focuses on longer ranges and larger scales • Days 1-8 • Write convective outlooks Image source: Steve M., Minnesota ClimatoloGy Working Group My Background
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs (WHA)
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs (WHA) The Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs is headed by Assistant Secretary of State Thomas A. Shannon. The Bureau is responsible for managing and promoting U.S. interests in the region by supporting democracy, trade, and sustainable economic development, and fostering cooperation on issues such as drug trafficking and crime, poverty reduction, and environmental protection. Interns in the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs (WHA) may serve in any of the Bureau's eleven offices. Offices consist of a Director, Deputy Director, multi-functional officers, and support staff. FUNCTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES MAY CONSIST OF: • Drafting and editing reports, including the Assistant Secretary's Daily Activity Report • Assisting in sorting incoming cables for the Office Director and Deputy Director • Drafting letters for the President and replies to Congressional correspondence • Responding to WHA Front Office requests for input on mega talkers (large documents containing the Department policy on a given issue) • Reviewing daily newspapers and electronic databases for pertinent articles on a specific country • Becoming familiar with officer portfolios in order to sort telegram traffic and fill in behind when they are out • Providing assistance to officers as needed to include researching, analyzing, and translating existing material on a specific country and maintaining databases on monitoring and visa issuance • Responding to public inquiries regarding a specific country's policy • Compiling comprehensive briefing books on a specific country The following are examples of duties that have been performed by interns in the Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs: • Compiling comprehensive briefing books on Bolivia, Colombia, Peru and Ecuador to be used by transferring FSOs and desk officers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth and Early Years of the Storm Prediction Center
    AUGUST 1999 CORFIDI 507 The Birth and Early Years of the Storm Prediction Center STEPHEN F. C ORFIDI NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Storm Prediction Center, Norman, Oklahoma (Manuscript received 12 August 1998, in ®nal form 15 January 1999) ABSTRACT An overview of the birth and development of the National Weather Service's Storm Prediction Center, formerly known as the National Severe Storms Forecast Center, is presented. While the center's immediate history dates to the middle of the twentieth century, the nation's ®rst centralized severe weather forecast effort actually appeared much earlier with the pioneering work of Army Signal Corps of®cer J. P. Finley in the 1870s. Little progress was made in the understanding or forecasting of severe convective weather after Finley until the nascent aviation industry fostered an interest in meteorology in the 1920s. Despite the increased attention, forecasts for tornadoes remained a rarity until Air Force forecasters E. J. Fawbush and R. C. Miller gained notoriety by correctly forecasting the second tornado to strike Tinker Air Force Base in one week on 25 March 1948. The success of this and later Fawbush and Miller efforts led the Weather Bureau (predecessor to the National Weather Service) to establish its own severe weather unit on a temporary basis in the Weather Bureau± Army±Navy (WBAN) Analysis Center Washington, D.C., in March 1952. The WBAN severe weather unit became a permanent, ®ve-man operation under the direction of K. M. Barnett on 21 May 1952. The group was responsible for the issuance of ``bulletins'' (watches) for tornadoes, high winds, and/or damaging hail; outlooks for severe convective weather were inaugurated in January 1953.
    [Show full text]
  • Pandemic Marks 1St PDA Asia Pacific's Anniversary
    Volume 1 • Issue 2 July 2020 www.pda.org/pdaletter Pandemic Marks 1st PDA Asia Pacific’s Anniversary Having just passed the milestone of our first-year initiation as the PDA Asia Pacific lead- ership, we find ourselves in a totally unpredictable situation. Thankfully, we belong to a network of association industry professionals who followed the situation in China starting in January. This enabled us to adapt to the situation quickly. Aside from the operational precautionary measures by operating our team in Singapore under the business continuity plan protocol early on, we had yet to see the impact in the region and the duration of it. Without giving away my age, I recall the days of SARS and applied what I learned from that time. Still, as we now all know, not much could have prepared us for this. Following the launch of PDA Asia Pacific last year, we reached out to PDA’s chapters in Japan, Korea, Taiwan and Singapore. We listened and we learned, adding three new events in these markets. We recognized that PDA members in several countries had a wonderful process in place, providing a good quantity of education for members. PDA’s Japan Chapter already has a strong framework. We also learned regulatory agencies and Marcel Ewals, PDA Asia Pacific Office other organizations in the region PDA was well known but its presence not felt. With this in mind, we drafted an ambitious plan to be represented at events, industry meetings and digital offerings. Of course, digital resources have become more critical as of late and we hope that you have encountered more PDA activities whilst browsing the internet feedback is always welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • APA MAGAZINE the Magazine for the Polygraph Professional
    APA MAGAZINE The Magazine for the Polygraph Professional Dr. Tim Weber, Editor In this Issue May/June 2008 Volume 41,3 2008 APA Annual Seminar Schedule, p. 16 APA President reports on the results of the first mail-in ballot election, p. 34 APA Magazine 2008, 41(3) 1 AMERICAN International INSTITUTE OF POLYGRAPH Accredited by the American Polygraph Association Recognized by the American Association of Police Polygraphists WHEN QUALITY COUNTS! Professional Polygraph Examiner Training. Curriculum and training methods based on Federal training and experience with the US Army Criminal Investigations Command and the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute. Training programs have an overall objective of providing the knowledge, skills and ability to professionally administer polygraph exams. Schedule 1: TRADITIONAL TEN (10) WEEKS IN RESIDENCE Schedule 2: EIGHT (8) WEEKS IN RESIDENCE & 2 WEEKS INTERNSHIP ● We provide polygraph equipment for training. Try it before you buy it. Lafayette LX4000 Axciton Stoelting CPS II Limestone Polygraph Professional Suite ● Experienced faculty using effective training methods. Less talk, more action. ● Video recorded laboratory exercises. Learn by doing. 2008 Class Start Dates January 7 March 17 April 21 September 8 Lafayette, IN 8 weeks Director & Primary Instructor– Charles (Chuck) E. Slupski Army CID Examiner (1983 – 1996) / DOD Polygraph Institute Instructor (1992 – 1996) Primary Instructor – Allan E. Stein Army CID Examiner & Polygraph Instructor at US Army Polygraph School NEW FACILITY. Great location
    [Show full text]
  • Killer Tornado Guide (1950-2020) for North Central and Northeast Wisconsin
    KILLER TORNADO GUIDE (1950-2020) FOR NORTH CENTRAL AND NORTHEAST WISCONSIN Updated: 2/1/21 1 KILLER TORNADO GUIDE (1950-2020) FOR NORTH CENTRAL AND NORTHEAST WISCONSIN BROWN MENOMINEE CALUMET OCONTO DOOR ONEIDA FOREST OUTAGAMIE FLORENCE PORTAGE KEWAUNEE SHAWANO LANGLADE VILAS LINCOLN WAUPACA MANITOWOC WAUSHARA MARATHON WINNEBAGO MARINETTE WOOD 2 TORNADO REFERENCE GUIDE – KILLER TORNADOES DATE Time Deadly Tornadoes in GRB Service Area Deaths Month Day Year (CST) Start / End Location County or Counties 2 6 25 1950 21:00 1 W Woodboro - 5 NE Rhinelander Oneida 6 9 26 1951 15:45-1608 9 SSW Amherst - 2 SW Bear Creek Portage, Waupaca 2 4 3 1956 12:50 3 S Bancroft - 2 NW Amherst Portage 2 8 19 1968 16:10 3 SW Pound - Marinette Marinette 1 8 9 1979 18:20 Rockland Beach Calumet 1 4 27 1984 14:37-15:07 Fawn Lake - Star Lake Oneida, Vilas 1 4 27 1984 15:20-15:40 1 NE Winneconne - Freedom Winnebago, Outagamie 2 6 8 1985 18:15-18:32 Park Falls - 3 SE Monico Oneida 1 8 29 1992 19:10-19:55 1 N Wautoma - 3 SE Poy Sippi Waushara 1 8 19 2011 15:45-15:56 2.9 NW - 5.2 ESE Wausaukee Marinette 2 DEATHS: June 25, 1950 The EF4 tornado touched down one mile west of Woodboro in Oneida County around 9 PM CST and traveled 13.1 miles to five miles northeast of Rhinelander. The tornado reached a maximum width of 880 yards. Two deaths were reported in Oneida County. 6 DEATHS: September 26, 1951 The EF4 tornado developed 9 miles south southwest of Amherst in Portage County around 3:45 PM CST.
    [Show full text]