DOCSLIB.ORG

Important Notice**

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Important Notice** **IMPORTANT NOTICE** . The format of this RFP has been simplified. Only the following pages require signatures: 1. Exhibit A – Pre-Qualification Questionnaire 2. Exhibit B.1 – Bid Response Packet, Bidder Information and Acceptance page must be signed by Bidder 3. Exhibit B2 – Bid Pricing Forms Please read EXHIBIT B.1 – Bid Response Packet carefully, INCOMPLETE BIDS WILL BE REJECTED. Alameda County will not accept submissions or documentation after the bid response due date. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL No. 901098 for REGIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PROCUREMENT (R-REP) For complete information regarding this project, see RFP posted at http://www.acgov.org/gsa_app/gsa/purchasing/bid_content/contractopportunities.jsp or contact the County representative listed below. Thank you for your interest! Contact Person: Michael Lu, Contract Specialist II Phone Number: (510) 208-9649 E-mail Address: [email protected] RFQ RESPONSE DUE by 2:00 p.m. On October 22, 2013 RFP RESPONSE DUE By 2:00 p.m. December 26, 2013 at Alameda County, GSA–Purchasing 1401 Lakeside Drive, Suite 907 Oakland, CA 94612 Alameda County is committed to reducing environmental impacts across our entire supply chain. If printing this document, please print only what you need, print double-sided, and use recycled-content paper. 1401 Lakeside Drive, Suite 907 Oakland, CA 94612 Phone: 510-208-9600 Website: http://www.acgov.org/gsa/departments/purchasing/ Revision 2013-5-13 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PREQUALIFICATION AND REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL No. 901098 SPECIFICATIONS, TERMS & CONDITIONS for REGIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PROCUREMENT (R-REP) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. OVERVIEW AND SCOPE .......................................................................................................... 4 A. INTENT ............................................................................................................................... 4 B. SCOPE ................................................................................................................................ 4 C. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................................................................... 8 D. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................... 9 E. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................ 10 II. CALENDAR OF EVENTS ......................................................................................................... 13 A. NETWORKING and BIDDERS CONFERENCES .................................................................... 14 B. FACILITY SITE WALKS ....................................................................................................... 14 III. SOLICITATION PROCESS ....................................................................................................... 16 A. PRE-QUALIFICATION PROCESS ......................................................................................... 16 B. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROCESS ............................................................................... 20 C. NOTICE OF RECOMMENDATION TO AWARD ................................................................... 22 D. RFP PROTEST AND APPEAL PROCESS ............................................................................... 23 E. AWARD ............................................................................................................................ 23 F. METHOD OF CONTRACTING ............................................................................................ 24 IV. INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS ................................................................................................. 25 A. COUNTY CONTACTS ......................................................................................................... 25 B. BID FORMS ....................................................................................................................... 25 ATTACHMENTS A. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS BIDDERS QUESTIONNAIRE B. BID FORMS B.1 Bid Response Requirements Packet B.2 Pricing Submittal Form B.2A L1 Pricing Submittal Form B.2B M1 Pricing Submittal Form B.2C M2 Pricing Submittal Form B.2D M3 Pricing Submittal Form B.2E M4 Pricing Submittal Form B.2F S1 Pricing Submittal Form B.2G S2 Pricing Submittal Form B.2H F1 Pricing Submittal Form B.2I T1 Pricing Submittal Form B.2J BA Pricing Submittal Form B.2K BA2 Pricing Submittal Form B.3 PVsyst Assumptions and Instructions B.4 Experience and Past Projects Form B.5 Exceptions to Terms and Conditions B5.A PPA Exceptions B5.B Standard Agreement Exceptions C. SITE AND PARTICIPATING AGENCY INFORMATION C.1 Site Summary and Bundling Spreadsheet C.2 Site Technical Overview Document (available on FTP site) C.3 Site Historical Electrical Usage (available on FTP site) C.4 Participating Agency Credit Ratings C.5A Accessing the File Transfer Portal (FTP) C.5B Accessing the Secure File Transfer Portal (SFTP) D. REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS D.1 Solar PV Specifications and Requirements D.2 Solar Thermal Specifications and Requirements D.3 Fuel Cell Specifications and Requirements E. LEGAL AND REGULATORY INFORMATION E.1 PPA Template E.2 Cash Acquisition Terms and Conditions E.3 Insurance Requirements E.4 Unique Contracting Requirements E.5 Required General Conditions E.6 List of Workforce Development Training Programs F. RFP DISTRIBUTION LIST G. RFP EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORING MATRIX (FOR QUALIFIED PROPOSERS) Specifications, Terms & Conditions for REGIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PROCUREMENT (R-REP) I. OVERVIEW AND SCOPE A. INTENT The County of Alameda (hereinafter “the County”) acting as the lead agency, is requesting proposals from qualified firms (“Bidder(s)” or “Firm”) for up to 187 municipal facilities across 19 public agencies located within Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties. The Proposer shall provide renewable energy electricity generating systems (“renewable energy” or “Systems”) using either a direct purchase, a power purchase agreement (“PPA”), a lease or some other financing program / method that creates net cost savings to the public agencies. It is the intent of these specifications, terms and conditions to describe the requirements and process for purchasing renewable energy generation systems from selected bidders for the Regional Renewable Energy Procurement’s 19 participating public agencies within Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties (“Participating Agencies”) and the County of Alameda. This solicitation is being conducted in accordance with Government Code Section 4217.10, et. seq., and specifically, Section 4217.16, which authorizes public agencies to solicit proposals from qualified persons and to award a contract on the basis of the experience of the Firm, the type of technology employed by the Firm, the cost to the local agency, and any other relevant considerations, provided that the projects deliver net cost savings to the public agency. The solicitation will include a qualification, and then a proposal submittal phase where Qualified Proposers will be selected based upon best value for the majority of sites described in Bid Bundles using the evaluation and scoring criteria in Section III.B.1. While price is a factor in the evaluation of proposals, the Firm will be selected based on factors that provide the County and Participating Agencies with the best value overall given the specified evaluation criteria. The County and Participating Agencies reserve the right to award contracts for all, some or none of the listed sites depending on factors that are completely at their discretion. In addition to the Bid Bundles described above, there are two Alternate Bid Bundles. B. SCOPE This Request for Qualifications and Request for Proposals (hereafter RFP) is issued by the County of Alameda on its own behalf and on the behalf of 18 other participating agencies in the greater Bay Area. The scope of this RFP is to identify qualified providers of renewable energy power systems for municipal facilities via on-site generation of solar photovoltaic (PV), solar thermal, and fuel cell systems. To provide best value to each agency, various financing options are sought so that they can select from appropriate choices including, but not limited to direct purchase, power purchase agreement and other cost-effective options. RFP No. 901098 Page 4 Specifications, Terms & Conditions for REGIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY PROCUREMENT (R-REP) The potential capacity for renewable energy generation across the 187 sites in the Bid Bundles has been estimated to be over 31 MW by independent energy consultants. These sites have been grouped into nine (9) Bid Bundles to achieve the best value pricing for the Participating Agencies given considerations for technology, system size, existing rate structures, geography, unique contracting requirements, etc., and to create bid bundles that will achieve broad competitive appeal. Qualified Firms may provide proposals for one, multiple or all bundles, but must bid on all sites within each bundle for which they are providing a bid. Proposers will be evaluated based on their submitted proposals and pricing for each site, and the bid bundle(s). The bundle pricing is intended to reflect a discounted price given the economies of scale and reduced transaction costs associated with the collaborative procurement. Although Participating Agencies have conducted site surveys and other due diligence, the Firms submitting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lessons from the Solar Leasing Boom in California
    Improving Solar Policy: Lessons from the solar leasing boom in California Climate Policy Initiative Andrew Hobbs Elinor Benami Uday Varadarajan Brendan Pierpont July 2013 A CPI Report Acknowledgements The authors thank the following organizations and professionals for their collaboration and input: Marzia Zafar and Robert Kinosian of CPUC, Michael Mendelsohn, Carolyn Davidson,and Easan Drury of NREL; Varun Rai and Ben Sig- rin of University of Texas – Austin; Jorge Medina and John Stanton of Solar City; Holly Gordon and Walker Wright of Sun Run, Darren Deffner of SEPA; Philip Shen of Roth Capital; Kevin Hurst of the U.S. Office of Science and Technol- ogy Policy, James Fine of the Environmental Defense Fund, Judson Jaffe of the U.S. Treasury; and Eric Gimon of the Vote Solar Initiative. The perspectives expressed here are CPI’s own. Finally the authors would like to acknowledge inputs, comments and internal review from CPI staff: David Nelson, Jeff Deason, Kath Rowley, Rodney Boyd, Wenjuan Dong, Tim Varga, Elysha Rom-Povolo, and Ruby Barcklay. Descriptors Sector Renewable Energy Region U.S. Keywords Solar; PV; leasing; business models; renewable energy Contact Andrew Hobbs [email protected] About CPI Climate Policy Initiative is a team of analysts and advisors that works to improve the most important energy and land use policies around the world, with a particular focus on finance. An independent organization supported by a grant from the Open Society Foundations, CPI works in places that provide the most potential for policy impact including Brazil, China, Europe, India, Indonesia, and the United States. Copyright © 2013 Climate Policy Initiative www.climatepolicyinitiative.org All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost-Effective Solar Strategies for Affordable Housing in New York State
    Cost-Effective Solar Strategies for Affordable Housing in New York State Final Report | Report Number 20-11 | December 2019 NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise, and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Mission Statement: Advance innovative energy solutions in ways that improve New York’s economy and environment. Vision Statement: Serve as a catalyst – advancing energy innovation, technology, and investment; transforming New York’s economy; and empowering people to choose clean and efficient energy as part of their everyday lives. Cover Image:Courtesy of Anika Wistar-Jones, Solar One Cost-Effective Solar Strategies for Affordable Housing in New York State Final Report Prepared for: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Albany, NY Prepared by: Solar One New York, NY Noah Ginsburg Director, Here Comes Solar Marigo Post-Farr Multifamily Program Manager Anika Wistar-Jones Affordable Solar Program Manager NYSERDA Report: 20-11 NYSERDA Contract 137953 December 2019 Notice Solar One prepared this report in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter “NYSERDA”). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of NYSERDA or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, NYSERDA, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Local Permitting on the Cost of Solar Power
    The Impact of Local Permitting on the Cost of Solar Power How a federal effort to simplify processes can make solar affordable for 50% of American homes January 2011 Endorsed by: Alteris Renewables Namaste Solar Sullivan Solar Power American Solar Electric PetersenDean Sun Chariot Solar Acro Energy Real Goods Solar Sunetric Corbin Solar REC Solar Sunlight Solar Energy Greenspring Energy RevoluSun SunTrek Solar groSolar Sierra Club Trinity Solar HelioPower SolarTech Verengo Solar Plus Mainstream Energy SolSource The Vote Solar Initiative Mercury Solar Systems The full report is available as a free download at www.sunrunhome.com/permitting. Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................ 1 Note from SunRun ......................................................................................... 2 The impact of local permitting on the cost of solar power ............................. 3 Local permitting costs $2,516 per installation ............................................ 6 Streamlined permitting will benefit jurisdictions ......................................... 7 Launching the Residential Solar Permitting Initiative ................................... 9 The prize: grid parity for more than half of American homes .................... 11 Appendix ..................................................................................................... 12 Appendix A: Methodology ......................................................................... 13 Appendix B: Data .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Bankruptcy Court SUMMARY of SCHEDULES
    B6 Summary (Official Form 6 - Summary) (12/07) United States Bankruptcy Court District of Delaware In re 360 Degree Solar Holdings, Inc. Case No. 11-1 2800 Debtor Chapter 11 SUMMARY OF SCHEDULES - AMENDED Indicate as to each schedule whether that schedule is attached and state the number of pages in each. Report the totals from Schedules A, B, D, E, F, I, and J in the boxes provided. Add the amounts from Schedules A and B to determine the total amount of the debtor's assets. Add the amounts of all claims from Schedules D, E, and F to determine the total amount of the debtor's liabilities. Individual debtors must also complete the "Statistical Summary of Certain Liabilities and Related Data" if they file a case under chapter 7, Il, or 13. NAME OF SCHEDULE ATTACHED NO. OF ASSETS LIABILITIES OTHER (YES/NO) SHEETS Yes 1 0.00 A - Real Property Yes 5 99,075.08 B - Personal Property No 0 C - Property Claimed as Exempt Yes 15 783,755,765.61 D - Creditors Holding Secured Claims E - Creditors Holding Unsecured Yes 2 143.00 Priority Claims (Tote] orCiannu on Schedule E) F - Creditors Holding Unsecured Yes 3 1,787,122.48 Nonpriority Claims 0 - Executory Contracts and Yes 51 Unexpired Leases Yes I H - Codebtors - Current Income of Individual No 0 N/A Debtor(s) J - Current Expenditures of Individual No 0 N/A Debtor(s) Total Number of Sheets of ALL Schedules 78 Total Assets 99,075.08 Total Liabilities 785,543,031.09 1 Changes are highlighted in yellow.
    [Show full text]
  • United States of America Before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) New England Ratepayers Association ) No. EL20-42 ) PROTEST OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REGULATORY UTILITY COMMISSIONERS INTRODUCTION Net metering is a retail service provided by local distribution utilities under which the retail electric service they provide is measured by, and is billed based on, the net delivery of electricity to the retail customer during a retail service billing period, and the utility manages any outflow from retail customers’ local generation, typically located behind the meter. Net metering has been an established feature of retail electric rates and state energy policy across the nation for decades.1 Nearly every state has enacted a net metering program to promote renewable resources and distributed generation within its boundaries. Federal law recognizes that the decision to allow or require utilities to offer net metering service is one for the states, and lies outside the Commission’s jurisdiction. Indeed, the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (“EPAct 2005”) affirmatively encouraged “[e]ach state regulatory authority” to include net metering service among its regulatory policies and as part of the local utility services that it regulates.2 The Commission, too, has for nearly 20 years acknowledged states’ authority and held that net metering does not involve wholesale sales subject to its jurisdiction. Relying on that settled law, states and utilities have developed and implemented net metering programs, and millions of Americans have made long-term investments in solar panels and other distributed generation for their homes and businesses. Based on court decisions dating from 2010 and 2012, Petitioner asks the Commission to disregard established law and that reliance, to effectively declare the net metering programs, rates, and regulations in nearly every state to be unlawful, and to impose uniform and rigid federal regulation in their place.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2017 Board Packet
    April 24th, 2017 Board of Advisors Meeting ENERGY EFFICIENCY CENTER 1 Thank you to our Sponsors These sponsors have made significant financial contributions to support the Energy Efficiency Center’s mission to accelerate the development and commercialization of energy efficiency technologies and to train future leaders in energy efficiency. Front Cover: Rendering of the 2017 UC Davis Solar Decathlon house—OUR H2Ouse—an original design that addresses the severe drought in California. 2 WELCOME Welcome Members of the Board of Advisors and Special Guests, Thank you for participating in our Spring 2017 Board of Advisors meeting. This is an exciting and important time to come together. We have experienced some great success this past year, including: ■ Launching the Energy Graduate Group and recruiting our first class of students. (The first cohort arrives this Fall.) ■ Advancing strategic U.S. and global partnerships, including deeper collaborations with the Office of Naval Research and Mexico, launching an India Initiative, and participating in the Mandela Washington Fellowship program’s first energy-themed institute. ■ Supporting critical project-based learning opportunities, including a UC Davis team to compete in the U.S. Department of Energy’s Solar Decathlon. ■ Partnering to develop key energy data analytics software platforms. ■ Advancing one of 13 UC Davis Big Ideas—“Leading the Way to Climate Neutrality.” ■ Hiring staff to fill essential needs, including a Director of Development and Strategic Partnerships, a Senior Director of Development, a Senior Writer, and a Senior Development Engineer. Looking ahead, we have important work to accomplish this year, including: ■ Recruiting a Faculty Director—In 2015, we launched an international search for a faculty director.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Energy for Resilient Communities: Expanding Solar Generation in Baltimore’S Low-Income Neighborhoods
    Clean Energy for Resilient Communities: Expanding Solar Generation in Baltimore’s Low-Income Neighborhoods February 2014 Report Prepared for The Abell Foundation by Clean Energy Group Robert G. Sanders Lewis Milford Clean Energy Group (CEG) CEG is a leading national, nonprofit advocacy organization working on innovative technology, finance, and policy programs in the areas of clean energy and climate change. CEG also manages the Clean Energy States Alliance, a coalition of state and municipal clean energy funds. For more information about CEG, visit www.cleanegroup.org. Authors’ Note This paper is a product of the Clean Energy Group and was generously funded by The Abell Foundation. The views and opinions in this report are the authors’ alone. ©2014 Clean Energy Group Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Resilient Communities and Resilient Power ................................................................................................... 7 Best Practices for Expanding Solar Generation in Low-Income Urban Communities ................................... 13 Financing Options ......................................................................................................................................... 24 Costs and BeneFits of Distributed
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Financing to Achieve Sunshot: NREL AOP
    Advanced Financing to Achieve SunShot: NREL AOP July 2, 2014 Michael Mendelsohn, NREL NREL is a naonal laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Capital market parGcipaGon requires… (i) Asset and contractual consistency which allows project cash Liquidity and Price flows to be pooled into Transparency tradable and highly liquid securi7es, and (ii) Availability of due Feedback from Consistency in diligence tools Rang Agencies Cash Flows necessary to build and Investors market confidence in the asset class. Investor Confidence in Tools to Conduct Asset Due Diligence Performance 2 NREL SecuriGzaGon AcGviGes: Project History 3 Yr. DOE Award: NREL Goal Advanced Financing to Achieve SunShot Expand availability Organize the industry around: of capital • Standard documents • Best Prac*ces Lower cost • Robust datasets of capital Conduct analysis to comprehend Reduce opportuni*es and barriers transac*on cost, *me to Promote adop*on by developers, access capital financiers, law firms, etc. 3 SAPC: Approx. 300 ParGcipant EnGGes (as of June 2014) Developers Legal Investment Advisory Manuf. / Other Affordable Solar Akin Gump B of A Merrill Lynch Black & Veatch Enphase Altus Power Bingham McCutchen Barclays Ci* Trust Services Hanwha Q-Cells Amicus Solar Chadbourne & Parke CalCef CohnReznick KACO Borrego Solar Chapman & Cutler Ci Corelogic SMA CleanPath Cooley Clean Power Finance First Associates Solectria Distributed Sun Coronal Mgt Credit Agricole GL Garrad Hassan Energi Enfinity Covington Credit Suisse Kaen Muchin CleanPath Duke Energy Dechert Deutsche Bank Kroll Bond Rangs Skystream Markets HelioPower DLA Piper Energy One Finance KPMG LLP PV Evolu*on Labs Main Street Power Hunton & Williams Foresight Group Lease Dimensions Solar Electric Power Ass.
    [Show full text]
  • Solarprofessional.Com
    February/March 2014 PII Soft Costs | Training Best Practices ® Optimal Design, Installation & Performance solarprofessional.com Commissioning and O&M Tools Solar Power International 2013 Industry Perspectives on Utility Integration and PV System Safety DC Arc-Flash Hazard Mitigation Incident Energy Calculation Methods and PPE Requirements Projects Harvest Hill Golf Course Vine Fresh Produce Chalmers Residence industry professionals SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE solarprofessional.com 690 Electric Warsaw II Solar Farm Warsaw, NC f THE BEST IN CLASS Excellent module efficiency Approved for increased snow loads Get the most out of your Security for solar system’s durability valuable installation space in winter climates WE VIEW THE Positive power tolerance High System Reliability More power ensured for your investment Salt mist corrosion resistant RELIABILITY OF Ideal for maritime solar installations High performance at low irradiance Ammonia resistant OUR COMPANY & Constant high performance of your Delivering full performance in solar system agricultural areas Sand blast resistant OUR PRODUCTS AS Durable in desert winds Self- cleaning effect Reduces soil build up, provides Higher system performance & Quality EQUALLY IMPORTANT anti-reflective module surface PTC Rating: PVUSA Test Condition We understand that in the world of solar energy Canadian Solar modules consistently rank IP67 Junction Box at the top of PVUSA test conditions there are many choices and companies claiming California Energy Commission to offer “the best products” in the industry. At Provides long-term weather endurance PVSyst Simulation: System Performance Canadian Solar, we believe that “uncompromised Simulation quality, performance and value” are not just Industry leading linear warranty PV Systems with Canadian Solar models Guaranteed power for 25 years lead energy performance modeling with words, but part of our identity.
    [Show full text]
  • NREL Activities to Open Capital Market Investment and Bank Lending for Solar Deployment
    NREL Activities to Open Capital Market Investment and Bank Lending for Solar Deployment Presentation to Senate & White House Staff September 15 & 16, 2014 Michael Mendelsohn, NREL John Joshi, Capital Fusion Partners NREL/PR-6A20-62717 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Solar Industry Maturing Rapidly 4.75 GW installed in 2013 requiring $13.7 billion in deployment investment; 36% growth forecasted for 2014 Source: GTM/SEIA 2014 2 Value: Expand the Availability of Capital Traditionally, most managed funds did not invest in renewable energy (RE), although new financial innovations are opening investment opportunities. To further tap this capital, investors need liquid, tradable, market-priced products. Pension funds Insurance funds Conventional Investment Mutual funds Funds Sovereign Wealth Private equity Non- Conventional Hedge funds Investment Funds ETFs Private Wealth 0 10 20 30 40 50 Global Assets under Management ($ trillions) Hatched sources of capital historically invested in RE, but not necessarily from all investment buckets Source: The CityUK 3 Capital Market Participation Requires… i. Asset and contractual consistency, which allows project cash Liquidity and Price Transparency flows to be pooled into tradable and highly liquid securities, and Feedback from Consistency in ii. Availability of data to Rating Agencies conduct due diligence and Investors Cash Flows necessary to build market confidence in the asset class. Investor Wide Array of Confidence in Which creates virtuous Analytic Asset Capabilities cycle of… Performance 4 NREL Securitization Activities: Project History 3 Yr. DOE Award NREL / DOE Goal Under SunShot Initiative (FY ’13 – ’15) Expand availability Organize the industry around: of capital • Standard documents • Best practices Lower cost • Robust datasets of capital Comprehend Reduce opportunities and barriers transaction cost, time to Promote adoption by developers, access capital financiers, law firms, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership Updates. Million Solar Roofs and Interstate
    Become Partnership Updates Million Solar Roofs and One In Interstate Renewable Energy Council Annual Meeting Washington, D.C. A Million October 2005 Become Partnership Updates Million Solar Roofs and One In Interstate Renewable Energy Council Annual Meeting Washington, D.C. A Million October 2005 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 phone: 865.576.8401 fax: 865.576.5728 email: mailto:[email protected] Available for sale to the public, in paper,
    [Show full text]
  • Companies 0Titan Solar & Remodeling 1 Solar Solutions 1 Stop Shop 1800 Remodel 1800 Solar USA 1St US Energy LLC 21St Century
    Companies 0Titan Solar & Remodeling 1 Solar Solutions 1 Stop Shop 1800 Remodel 1800 Solar USA 1st US Energy LLC 21st Century Doors & Windows 21st Century Power Solutions 2Four6 Solar 2K Solar 310 Solar LLC 31Solar LLC 360 Solar Energy 360 Solar Group 4 Lakes Home Restoration 7 Summits Roofing 76 Solar 84 Lumber 84 Lumber Company 84 Lumber Company ADT ADT corp and Authorized ADT dealers A Plus Roofing A Real Advantage Construction A Two Z Windows & Doors Installing Quality A Wholesale Window Company A&E Mechanical A&M Energy Solutions A&R Solar A.D.D. Solar Connect A.I. Solar A.M. Solar A-1 Electric A1 Energy LLC A1 Plumbing A1 Solar LLC A1 Solar Power A-1 Windows & Doors, Inc. A-1 Windows & Doors, Inc. A-1 Windows & Doors, Inc. Folkers Window Company PGT Industries A1A Solar A1A Solar Contracting Inc. AA Solar Services LLC AAA AAA Solar AABCO AAE Solar Aapco Abakus Solar USA Inc. Abbott Electric Inc. ABC Leads ABC Seamless Corporate ABCO Solar ABest Energy Power Ablaze Energy Able Energy Able Energy Co. Able Heating & Cooling Able Roof Mr Roof ABM Services & Renovations Absolute Solar Absolutely Solar Abundant Air Inc Abundant Energy Abundant Solar AC Solar Inc. Accelerate Solar Accent Window Systems, Inc. Acceptance Access Geothermal Access Insurance Acclaimed Roofing of Colorado Accord Construction / Window Wise Austin Accuquote Accurate Architecture LLC ACDC Solar Acker Roofing ACME Environmental ACME International Services Inc. Acordia Acquisition Technologies Acro Energy Active Energies Active Energies Inc. Active Energies Solar Active Solar Addin Solar Addison Homes LLC Addy Electric Adobe Reo Adobe Solar Advance Power Inc Advance Solar Advance Solar & Spa Advance Solar Construction Advance Solar Construction LLC Advanced Alternative Energy Solutions Advanced Commercial Enterprises Advanced Distributed Generation Advanced Energy Resources Advanced Energy Services Advanced Energy Solutions Advanced Energy Systems Development LLC Advanced Mechanical Systems Inc.
    [Show full text]