DOCSLIB.ORG

Solar Today 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

GetStarted_1_76.indd 1 9/1/10 2:44:03 PM What makes a PV module exceptional? It has to outperform its competition. It has to generate high yields, generate them reliably and continue to generate them for years. Conergy’s PowerPlus does just that. The Conergy PowerPlus series of PV modules ensures you get maximum return on your investment. Across the globe, one in every ten modules is manufactured, sold or installed by Conergy. We hold ourselves and our products to the highest standards. That is why Conergy is the global leader in PV systems. Discover Conergy PowerPlus www.conergy.us | [email protected] | 888.396.6611 National Solar Tour Platinum Sponsor NERG O Y C QUALITY M Y A D N A E M I N G E R GetStarted_1_76.indd 2 9/1/10 2:44:03 PM ANNUAL ISSUE VOLUME 24, NO. 8 FALL/WINTER 2010 SOLARTODAY.ORG A supplement of SOLARTODAY GET STARTED 2011 Solar BUYERS’ GUIDE A National List of Local Solar Businesses pages 34-65 BASICS 8 Getting the Most for Your Energy Dollar By Seth Masia 10 Home Systems Keep Track of Energy Use ROGER GAVAN ROGER By Scotte Elliott taste OF the Tour Jerry and Lucy Fischetti of Warwick, N.Y., 12 Heat Your Water With the Sun put in a solar water-heating system to cut their gas bill by $135 each Edited by Diana Young, Liz Merry and Barry Butler month. Here, Jerry poses with installer Patrick Gallagher. 16 All About Photovoltaic Systems By Joseph McCabe, P.E. 20 All About Wind By Mick Sagrillo 24 Energy-Saving HVAC Options By Mike Koshmrl ON THE COVER: Bill and Linda Hopkins, in the Los LEARN MORE Angeles area, produce all of their electrical power needs 26 Does It Pay? from their grid-tied 9-kilowatt photovoltaic system, installed By Andy Black in 2003 by Solar Electrical Systems of Westlake Village, 28 Books on Renewable Energy for the Home Calif. Utility rebates covered 70 percent of the cost, before Compiled by Seth Masia tax credits. A battery bank maintains power during utility outages to run lights, appliances and computers. An electric 30 Working With an Installer water heater, installed in 2008, cut the gas bill by 50 percent. By Seth Masia The solar system also charges their two Toyota RAV4 EV 32 Get Trained for a Career in the Solar Industry electric cars, which they use for commuting and local errands. By Mike Koshmrl They drive a Toyota Prius for longer trips. PHOTOGRAPHY: BRYONY SHEARMUR Copyright © 2010 by the American Solar Energy Society Inc. All rights reserved. solartoday.org GET STARTED SOLAR TODAY 3 GetStarted_1_76.indd 3 9/1/10 2:44:05 PM Hagman Ad - Solar Today get started Sept 2010 copy.pdf 1 7/28/2010 3:13:11 PM Good for the planet Good for your wallet “There’s always a better alternative. Shine, baby, shine!” - Larry Hagman C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Putting a solar electric system on your roof is like getting paid to reduce your carbon footprint. And with Sunkits® from SolarWorld, America’s largest solar panel manufacturer, it’s never been easier or more affordable. Call SolarWorld at 1-800-94-SOLAR or visit our website today to schedule a free estimate. www.solarworld-usa.com GetStarted_1_76.indd 4 9/1/10 2:44:05 PM GET STARTED A supplement of SOLARTODAY GET STARTED and SOLAR TODAY are published by the American Solar Energy Society, ases.org, the U.S. Section of the International Solar Energy Society. Join Us on the Solar Tour! On Saturday, Oct. 2, the American Solar Energy Society presents the 15th annual National Solar Tour in communities across the country. It’s your chance to see how your neighbors make use of home energy improvements in your climate. To find a tour near you, go to nationalsolartour.org and click on Find A Tour. A SI ETH MA ETH S Solar into the Mainstream 6 Welcome to the By RICHARD BURNS ASES National Solar Tour By Brad Collins ON BEHALF OF THE MORE THAN 10,000 vol- unteers, thousands of homeowners and hundreds of 66 New Products tour organizers, welcome to the American Solar Energy for Energy Efficiency Society’s 15th annual National Solar Tour! The tour 70 Inside ASES is all about neighbors talking to neighbors, and people talking to people, about all things solar. 72 Advertiser Index Richard Burns is Be prepared to see real-world examples of how 74 Chair’s Corner: The Joys of Solar the ASES National your neighbors are reducing their energy bills and By Margot McDonald, AIA, LEED AP Solar Tour Manager doing their part to mitigate climate change. Now it is ([email protected]). your turn to ask questions, take pictures and learn how to join more than 165,000 tour attendees in moving solar energy into the mainstream. I often tell tour organizers that they are planting “solar seeds.” Your atten- dance and participation in this year’s tour is proof that their efforts are reaping huge results. Take the next step by putting into action what you learn from this fun and educational event: Go solar in whatever way you can! And please be sure to thank all the homeowners and volunteers for opening up their homes for you to view. Almost every one of them began the solar journey by attending a previous tour. Enjoy, and pass it on! Don’t miss the next SOLAR TODAY In the November/December issue, get the inside story on solar build- GET STARTED environmental statement X ings, from California apartment buildings with solar water heating to GET STARTED is printed with vegetable ink Trees Energy Water Greenhouse Solid a Minnesota college that’s using its 400-kilowatt photovoltaic system on paper containing 100 percent post- Gases Waste consumer waste. The paper is produced at a 327 247 47,670 15 tons 14.5 tons as a hands-on teaching tool. And learn how to evaluate backup water- biomass-powered mill. This issue saves: million Btu gallons CO equivalent 2 heating options for your solar thermal system. Copyright © 2010 by the American Solar Energy Society Inc. All rights reserved. solartoday.org GET STARTED SOLAR TODAY 5 GetStarted_1_76.indd 5 9/1/10 2:44:06 PM perspective SOLAR TODAY® LEADING THE RenewaBLE Energy Revolution SOLartOdaY.Org Brad Collins: Executive Director/Publisher [email protected] Editorial Gina R. Johnson: Editor/Associate Publisher [email protected] Seth Masia: Deputy Editor Corey Dahl: Managing Editor Mike Koshmrl: Editorial Intern Solartoday.org Brooke Simmons: Manager of Online Publishing Design Allison J. Gray: Art Director Peggy Doyle: Designer Dan Bihn: Photojournalist Contributors Richard Crume, Rona Fried, Chuck Kutscher, Joseph McCabe, Liz Merry, Mick Sagrillo, Robert Ukeiley Advertising Sales A Annette Delagrange: Director of Sales, Colorado Territory SI [email protected] P: 630.234.9187 ETH MA ETH S Bonnie D. Hunt: Eastern Sales Manager [email protected] P: 215.750.7692 P: 800.598.7947 Welcome to the ASES National Solar Tour F: 215.741.4698 Rob Simonelli: Western Sales Manager [email protected] he American Solar Energy Society’s (ASES) National Solar Tour, now in its 15th P: 562.431.1630 F: 562.431.1530 year, is an opportunity to see how your neighbors use solar energy and live in climate- Shari Heinlein: National Sales Assistant [email protected] sensitive, efficient buildings. Year after year, the tour brings neighbors together to P: 303.443.3130 T F: 303.443.3212 learn about local smart building practices, solar installations and solar installers. We see real people in real buildings in our own neighborhoods. Magazine Advisory Council The ASES National Solar Tour is possible through the volun- Gabriela Martin, Chair Dan Bihn Paul Notari By BRAD COLLINS teer efforts of more than 5,000 building owners across the country. Richard Crume Alejandro Palomino Frank Kreith Mick Sagrillo They generously open their doors to show the community what Chuck Kutscher Ken Sheinkopf Joseph McCabe Robert Ukeiley they have done to become more sustainable. These building own- Dona McClain Jane M. Weissman ers are recruited by hundreds of volunteers who want to share their knowledge. More than 10,000 volunteer hours are spent ASES Operations Irene Pérez Law: Chief Operating Officer to organize each year’s tour. We owe special thanks to all who Becky Campbell-Howe: Director of Professional Education Neshama Abraham: Director of Marketing and Communications give of their free time to make this experience happen. Also, we Christy Honigman: Director of Development Chris Stimpson: Executive Campaigner offer special thanks to the tour’s sponsors, whose financial support Solar Nation, a program of ASES Carolyn Beach: Membership Manager makes this national effort possible: Conergy, Trina Solar, Sanyo Richard Burns: National Solar Tour Manager/ and Sun Crystals. Chapters Liaison Kristin Conrad: Web Development Manager This magazine, Get Started, is produced as an annual bonus Kate Hotchkiss: Program Manager/Chapters Liaison Dona McClain: Program Coordinator Brad Collins is the issue of SOLAR TODAY magazine. It’s an educational resource Elena Hoffrichter: Bookkeeper Christine Howard: Executive Assistant executive director of combined with a list of local installers, meant to help newcom- Ann Huggins: Member Services the American Solar ers to solar technologies shop intelligently. Get Started offers ASES Board of Directors Energy Society (ases. basic information on solar technology and efficient buildings, as Margot McDonald, Chair org). a supplement to what tour-goers learn from neighbors who have Jeff Lyng, Chair-elect Bill Poulin, Treasurer opened their solar-powered homes. Our goal with this magazine Paulette Middleton, Secretary John Reynolds, Immediate Past Chair is to provide a ready resource to encourage more solar deployment.
Recommended publications
  • Final Program

    Final Program

    FINAL PROGRAM May 3 – 8, 2008 • Town and Country Resort & Convention Center • San Diego, California SOLAR 2008 is presented by Featuring 37th ASES National Solar Conference 33rd National Passive Solar Conference 3rd Annual Renewable Energy Policy, Advocacy and Marketing Conference Solar Success! Training Event American Solar Energy Society Annual Meeting Society of Building Science Educators Annual Meeting Welcome On behalf of the American Solar Energy Society (ASES), the San Diego Renewable Energy Society (SDRES), the Northern California Solar Energy Association (NorCal Solar), the Redwood Empire Solar Living Association (RESLA), and the California Center for Sustainable Energy, welcome to SOLAR 2008! This year’s conference will build on the outstanding SOLAR successes of 2006 and 2007 where the dual role of renewable energy in climate and economic recovery, respectively, was clearly established. ASES Reports launched at these events — “Renewable Energy: A Key to Climate Recovery” and “Green Collar Jobs” — have been featured prominently in the public media. In 2008, we feel a new urgency about bringing together technology, policy and community solutions to address climate change, grow our economy and specifically look for solutions to reduce our carbon footprint. With a focus on renewable energy solutions in our communities and leadership to bring about change in our national energy policy we offer several new experiences at SOLAR 2008. First, we invite solar enthusiasts and those new to the field to participate more fully at SOLAR 2008 by opening our event on Public Days on Saturday and Sunday — at a discount for riders of mass transit! Featured will be demonstrations, films, speakers, and an exhibit hall with close to 200 booths.
  • TRENDS in PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey Report of Selected IEA Countries Between 1992 and 2011

    TRENDS in PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey Report of Selected IEA Countries Between 1992 and 2011

    TRENDS IN PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2011 Report IEA-PVPS T1-21:2012 TRENDS IN PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2011 Contents Introduction 2 1 Implementation of PV systems 3 2 The PV industry 24 3 Policy, regulatory and business framework for deployment 32 4 Summary of trends 39 PV technology note 44 Foreword This year’s 17th edition of the IEA PVPS international survey report on Trends in Photovoltaic (PV) Applications falls together with almost 20 years of global cooperation within the IEA PVPS The International Energy Agency (IEA), founded in 1974, Programme. The history of PV market deployment over this is an autonomous body within the framework of the decisive period for PV from its very first market developments to Organization for Economic Cooperation and the present large scale deployment, meanwhile accounting for Development (OECD). The IEA carries out a important shares of the newly installed capacity for electricity comprehensive programme of energy cooperation production, can uniquely be followed year by year in the series among its 28 member countries and with the of IEA PVPS trends reports. 2011 has been yet another year of unprecedented further market growth, continued massive participation of the European Commission. cost reduction and ongoing signs of industry and market consolidation. In total, about 28 GW of PV capacity were The IEA Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme installed in the IEA PVPS countries during 2011 (2010: 14,2 GW), (IEA PVPS) is one of the collaborative research and thus again doubling the installed capacity of the year before; this development agreements within the IEA and was raised the total installed capacity in IEA PVPS countries close to established in 1993.
  • Kern County, California

    Kern County, California

    2503 Eastbluff Dr., Suite 206 Newport Beach, California 92660 Fax: (949) 717-0069 Matt Hagemann · Tel: (949) 887-9013 Email: [email protected] August 22, 2012 Gideon Kracov Attorney at Law 801 S. Grand Ave, llu' Fl. Los Angeles, CA 90017 Subject: Comments on the Beacon Photovoltaic Project Dear Mr. Kracov: We have reviewed the July 2012 Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR"i for the Beacon Photovoltaic Project ("Project"). The Project proposes to build a 250-megawatt solar generation facility on approximately 3.6 square miles of land four miles north of California City in Kern County, California. Project components include: • A photovoltaic (PV) solar power generation facllity containing approximately 972,000 panels; • 230 ki lovolt overhead transmission line; • Operations and maintenance building, parking lot, office, and sewer system; and • Access roads (DEIR, p. 3-9). We have reviewed the DEIR for issues associated with air quality, hydrology and water quality, and ha za rds and hazardous materials. The DEIR fails to adequately disclose potentially significa nt impacts from Project constru.ction on workers and offsite r eceptors. A revised DEIR needs to be prepared to adequately disclose and analyze these impacts and provide mitigation, if necessary.· Air Quality The Project is located in t he Eastern Kern Air Pollution Cont rol District ("EKAPCD") and the M ojave Desert Air Basin ("MOAB"). Both the EKAPCD and t he M DAB are designated non-attainment for PMlO (DEIR, pp. 4.2-3, 22). Significant emlssion.s of P:MlO and its contributing sources, such as NOx, will lead 1 to a worsening of regional air quality.
  • Contact: Kevin Thornton for IMMEDIATE RELEASE 1-800-331-0085

    Contact: Kevin Thornton for IMMEDIATE RELEASE 1-800-331-0085

    Contact: Kevin Thornton FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 1-800-331-0085 WAL-MART ANNOUNCES SOLAR POWER PILOT PROJECT Pilot Project marks major step toward its goal of being supplied by 100 percent renewable energy BENTONVILLE, Ark., May 7, 2007 – Today Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE:WMT), announced a major purchase of solar power from three solar power providers, BP Solar, SunEdison LLC, and PowerLight, a subsidiary of SunPower Corporation, for 22 combined Wal- Mart stores, Sam’s Clubs and a distribution center in Hawaii and California. As part of a pilot project to determine solar power viability for Wal-Mart, the total solar power production from the 22 sites is estimated to be as much as 20 million kWh (kilowatt-hours) per year. When fully implemented, the aggregate purchase could be one of the U.S., if not the world’s, top-10 largest ever solar power initiatives. “We are taking aggressive steps towards our goal of being supplied by 100 percent renewable energy,” said Kim Saylors-Laster, vice president of energy for Wal-Mart. “The pilot project is yet another example of Wal-Mart’s commitment to making decisions that are good for business and the environment.” “We applaud Wal-Mart's drive to increase its use of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies and look forward to the long-term positive impact their efforts will have on our environment,” said Ron Judkoff, director of the Buildings and Thermal Systems Center at the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). “Wal-Mart's decision to take advantage of the economic and environmental benefits of solar power and energy efficiency technologies is a great step in the right direction.” The solar power pilot project is a major step toward Wal-Mart’s goal of being supplied by 100 percent renewable energy.
  • Renewable Energy

    Renewable Energy

    Projects Projects Renewable Energy Representative Engagements • Represented the project sponsor in connection with • Advised client on a significant investment in Nemaska the non-recourse project financing of the development, Lithium Inc., a Canadian lithium company, in a trans- installation, operation and maintenance of over 150,000 formational market transaction involving a key input in small-scale solar kits in areas of Peru not connected to lithium batteries which are a key component in electric the grid. cars and other technologies as well as renewables • Represented the Buyer acquiring 100 percent of the storage projects. equity interests of two project companies that have two • Advised the underwriters in DTE Electric Company’s solar photovoltaic projects with a combined rating of milestone $525 million green bond offering. Proceeds 6.5MWac/8MWdc on Oahu, Hawaii. of the bonds will support the development and • Represented a multinational energy corporation in construction of low-carbon, clean energy projects like connection with the acquisition of, and its tax equity solar arrays and wind farms, as well as the transmission investment in, solar power generating facilities in infrastructure to support related renewable facilities. California, Texas and Arizona valued from $16 million Solar to $25 million, including one project located on a • Represented Duke Energy in connection with a $360 military base under the U.S. military’s renewable energy million non-recourse project financing of a portfolio procurement initiative. of 24 operating solar farms in North Carolina under • Represented one of the world’s largest solar energy contract with various utility and non-utility offtakers. project companies in its entry into Japan and projects The facility includes a $330 million term loan, a $105 utilizing the Japanese Feed-In Tariff.
  • BNEF Long Form

    BNEF Long Form

    THE EVOLVING LANDSCAPE FOR EPCS IN US RENEWABLES 14 OCTOBER 2014 SECTION 4. THE PLAYERS This section of the report analyzes players in EPC for solar and wind in the US. About this analysis This section is based mostly on data gathered from companies’ websites. Much of this analysis relies on linking firms to projects in our database, which contains nearly 3,000 wind and solar projects in the US at various stages of development. The information mapping projects to their EPCs is captured in our Industry Intelligence database, available to subscribers of our service. There are a number of assumptions, caveats, and methodological points that are important to note in the context of this analysis; an Appendix at the end of this report identifies these. 4.1. LEAGUE TABLES The charts below show the top EPC firms for solar and wind, ranked strictly in terms of historic activity – ie, this does not reflect any kind of qualitative assessment about firms’ competencies. • Top-ranked solar EPCs includes the three vertically-integrated giants – SunPower, First Solar, and SunEdison – and some EPC specialists, like Bechtel and Fluor, that have performed a small number of very large projects. • The league tables for wind are headlined by Mortenson, IEA, RES Americas, and Blattner (with Blattner under-represented, as explained in the Appendix). Figure 8: Top EPC firms for US utility-scale solar (GW of Figure 9: Top EPC firms for US wind (GW of ‘active’ ‘active’ projects) projects) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0 4 8 12 SunPower MA Mortenson Co First Solar Inc IEA / White Construction MA Mortenson Co RES Americas E Light Wind and Solar Michels Corp Abengoa Blattner Energy Inc Bechtel Power Corp Wanzek Construction SunEdison Fluor Rosendin Electric Inc AMEC Tetra Tech Construction Inc Strata Solar LLC Signal Energy LLC Blymyer Engineers Dashiell Swinerton Inc TVIG / American Helios Blattner Energy Inc Reed & Reed Inc Baker Electric S&C Electric Co Blue Oak Energy Inc Barton Malow Co ARB Jay Cashman, Inc.
  • 3.17 Indirect and Cumulative Effects

    3.17 Indirect and Cumulative Effects

    FHWA-AZ-EIS-19-01-D Draft Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement and Preliminary Section 4(f) Evaluation Section 3.17, Indirect and Cumulative Effects March 2019 Federal Aid No. 999-M(161)S ADOT Project No. 999 SW 0 M5180 01P This page intentionally left blank I-11 Corridor Draft Tier 1 EIS Section 3.17. Indirect and Cumulative Effects 1 3.17 Indirect and Cumulative Effects 2 This section identifies potential indirect and cumulative effects that would result from the 3 implementation of the Build Corridor Alternatives. 4 3.17.1 Regulatory Guidance 5 The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) states that indirect effects “are caused by the 6 action and are later in time or farther removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable. 7 Indirect effects may include growth-inducing effects and other effects related to induced 8 changes in the pattern of land use, population density or growth rate, and related effects on air 9 and water and other natural systems, including ecosystems” (Code of Federal Regulations 10 Title 40, Sec. 1508.8[b]). Indirect effects are commonly categorized as effects that would not 11 occur “but for” the implementation of a project. Indirect effects also can be considered “ripple 12 effects” (Transportation Research Board 2002). 13 The CEQ states that cumulative effects result from the “incremental impact of an action when 14 added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of which 15 agency (federal or non-federal) or person undertakes such actions. Cumulative effects can 16 result from individually minor, but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of 17 time” (Code of Federal Regulations title 40, sec.
  • Energy Storage Development Plan

    Energy Storage Development Plan

    Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Energy Storage Development Plan Grid Planning and Development System Studies and Research Group September 2, 2014 This space is intentionally left blank Table of Contents: Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 A. Background ............................................................................................................. 1 B. Scope and Objectives .............................................................................................. 1 C. Energy Storage Targets ........................................................................................... 1 1. Overview and Policy ....................................................................................................... 3 A. Purpose .................................................................................................................... 3 B. Background ............................................................................................................. 3 C. ES Regulation, Policy, and Legislative Impacts ..................................................... 5 2. Scope & Objectives ......................................................................................................... 5 A. Energy Storage System Development Strategy ...................................................... 6 B. Energy Storage System Target Development Schedule ......................................... 6 3. Description of Existing
  • Solar Technical Appendix

    Solar Technical Appendix

    STRUCTURAL TECHNICAL APPENDIX 01/15/2015 for Residential Rooftop Solar Installations Structural Technical Appendix for Residential Rooftop Solar Installations (Appendix to California's Solar Permitting Guidebook's Toolkit Structural Document, based on the 2013 California Residential Code and 2013 California Building Code) STRUCTURAL TECHNICAL APPENDIX 01/15/2015 for Residential Rooftop Solar Installations Table of Contents Introduction 4 Overall Intent 4 Criteria for Expedited Permitting are not Limits for other Systems 4 Background/History 4 Purpose of the Structural Technical Appendix 5 Code Basis 5 California Residential Code (CRC) versus California Building Code (CBC) 5 Design Wind Speeds in CRC versus CBC 5 Organization of the Remainder of this Technical Appendix 6 Part 0. Region and Site Checks 8 Assumptions Regarding Snow and Wind Loads 8 Optional Additional Site Checks in Atypical Regions 9 Part 1. Roof Checks 15 Code Compliant Wood-framed Roof 15 1.A. Visual Review 15 Site Auditor Qualifications 15 Digital Photo Documentation 16 1.A.(1). No Reroof Overlays 16 1.A.(2). No Significant Structural Deterioration or Sagging 17 1.B. Roof Structure Data: 18 1.B.+ Optional Additional Rafter Span Check Criteria 18 Choose By Advantage 19 Horizontal Rafter Span Check 20 Prescriptive Rafter Strengthening Strategies 21 Roof Mean Height 22 Part 2. Solar Array Checks 24 2.A. "Flush-Mounted" Rooftop Solar Arrays 24 2.B. Solar Array Self-Weight 24 2.C. Solar Array Covers No More than Half the Total Roof Area 27 2.D. Solar Support Component Manufacturer's Guidelines 27 2.E. Roof Plan of Module and Anchor Layout 27 2.F.
  • Fire Fighter Safety and Emergency Response for Solar Power Systems

    Fire Fighter Safety and Emergency Response for Solar Power Systems

    Fire Fighter Safety and Emergency Response for Solar Power Systems Final Report A DHS/Assistance to Firefighter Grants (AFG) Funded Study Prepared by: Casey C. Grant, P.E. Fire Protection Research Foundation The Fire Protection Research Foundation One Batterymarch Park Quincy, MA, USA 02169-7471 Email: [email protected] http://www.nfpa.org/foundation © Copyright Fire Protection Research Foundation May 2010 Revised: October, 2013 (This page left intentionally blank) FOREWORD Today's emergency responders face unexpected challenges as new uses of alternative energy increase. These renewable power sources save on the use of conventional fuels such as petroleum and other fossil fuels, but they also introduce unfamiliar hazards that require new fire fighting strategies and procedures. Among these alternative energy uses are buildings equipped with solar power systems, which can present a variety of significant hazards should a fire occur. This study focuses on structural fire fighting in buildings and structures involving solar power systems utilizing solar panels that generate thermal and/or electrical energy, with a particular focus on solar photovoltaic panels used for electric power generation. The safety of fire fighters and other emergency first responder personnel depends on understanding and properly handling these hazards through adequate training and preparation. The goal of this project has been to assemble and widely disseminate core principle and best practice information for fire fighters, fire ground incident commanders, and other emergency first responders to assist in their decision making process at emergencies involving solar power systems on buildings. Methods used include collecting information and data from a wide range of credible sources, along with a one-day workshop of applicable subject matter experts that have provided their review and evaluation on the topic.
  • Motivators for Adoption of Photovoltaic Systems at Grid Parity: a Case Study from Southern Germany

    Motivators for Adoption of Photovoltaic Systems at Grid Parity: a Case Study from Southern Germany

    Motivators for adoption of photovoltaic systems at grid parity: A case study from Southern Germany Emrah Karakaya, Antonio Hidalgo, Cali Nuur a b s t r a c t In some countries, photovoltaic (PV) technology is at a stage of development at which it can compete with conventional electricity sources in terms of electricity generation costs, i.e., grid parity. A case in point is Germany, where the PV market has reached a mature stage, the policy support has scaled down and the diffusion rate of PV systems has declined. This development raises a fundamental question: what are the motives to adopt PV systems at grid parity? The point of departure for the relevant literature has been on the impact of policy support, adopters and, recently, local solar companies. However, less attention has been paid to the motivators for adoption at grid parity. This paper presents an in depth analysis of the diffusion of PV systems, explaining the impact of policy measures, adopters and system suppliers. Anchored in an extensive and exploratory case study in Germany, we provide a context specific explanation to the motivations to adopt PV systems at grid parity. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Analytical framework 2.1. Policy measures 2.2. Adopters 2.3. Local solar companies 3. Methodology 4. The context of the case 4.1. Grid parity 4.2. Hartmann Energietechnik GmbH 5. Results and discussion 5.1. Policy measures 5.2. Adopters 5.3. Local solar companies 6. Conclusions Acknowledgments References 1. Introduction Concerns about climate change and limited resources of fossil fuels have prompted governments to support the emergence and diffusion of renewable energy systems.
  • Lessons from the Solar Leasing Boom in California

    Lessons from the Solar Leasing Boom in California

    Improving Solar Policy: Lessons from the solar leasing boom in California Climate Policy Initiative Andrew Hobbs Elinor Benami Uday Varadarajan Brendan Pierpont July 2013 A CPI Report Acknowledgements The authors thank the following organizations and professionals for their collaboration and input: Marzia Zafar and Robert Kinosian of CPUC, Michael Mendelsohn, Carolyn Davidson,and Easan Drury of NREL; Varun Rai and Ben Sig- rin of University of Texas – Austin; Jorge Medina and John Stanton of Solar City; Holly Gordon and Walker Wright of Sun Run, Darren Deffner of SEPA; Philip Shen of Roth Capital; Kevin Hurst of the U.S. Office of Science and Technol- ogy Policy, James Fine of the Environmental Defense Fund, Judson Jaffe of the U.S. Treasury; and Eric Gimon of the Vote Solar Initiative. The perspectives expressed here are CPI’s own. Finally the authors would like to acknowledge inputs, comments and internal review from CPI staff: David Nelson, Jeff Deason, Kath Rowley, Rodney Boyd, Wenjuan Dong, Tim Varga, Elysha Rom-Povolo, and Ruby Barcklay. Descriptors Sector Renewable Energy Region U.S. Keywords Solar; PV; leasing; business models; renewable energy Contact Andrew Hobbs [email protected] About CPI Climate Policy Initiative is a team of analysts and advisors that works to improve the most important energy and land use policies around the world, with a particular focus on finance. An independent organization supported by a grant from the Open Society Foundations, CPI works in places that provide the most potential for policy impact including Brazil, China, Europe, India, Indonesia, and the United States. Copyright © 2013 Climate Policy Initiative www.climatepolicyinitiative.org All rights reserved.