DOCSLIB.ORG

CNPS 2009 Conservation Conference: Strategies and Solutions Abstracts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CNPS 2009 Conservation Conference: Strategies and Solutions Abstracts CNPS 2009 Conservation Conference: Strategies and Solutions Abstracts for Oral and Poster Presentations Note: Abstracts listed alphabetically by first or presenting author. ACREE, LISA, National Park Service. Yosemite National Park, P.O. Box 700, El Portal, CA, 95318; [email protected] APPLYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA) ECOSYSTEM FRAMEWORK TO EVALUATE THE COLLECTIVE PERFORMANCE OF MEADOW STUDIES IN YOSEMITE Yosemite National Park is home to over 8,000 montane and subalpine meadows, many of high interest to park visitors, resource managers, and scientists. This appreciation and interest has generated a number of broad to small-scale meadow studies on a variety of topics that range from changes in vegetation on a landscape-scale to (fortunately unsuccessful) hunts for Argentine ants. While all of these studies contribute to an understanding of the biotic integrity of Yosemite meadows, this poster evaluates their collective performance, using a systematic tool developed by the EPA known as A Framework For Assessing and Reporting on Ecological Condition: An SAB Report (EPA Framework). The EPA Framework describes six Essential Ecological Attributes: landscape condition; biotic condition; chemical and physical characteristics; ecological processes; hydrology and geomorphology; and natural disturbance regimes. This poster presents the current meadow studies in Yosemite meadows as organized under the EPA Framework, which is used as a guide to aggregate information. The EPA Framework proved to be a valuable tool to illuminate information gaps at a variety of scales, and facilitate the sharing of data, models, and insights. The Framework (and its subcategories such as indicators and measures) also lends itself for creative applications such as determining a defensible range of biotic indicators for user capacity determinations. The EPA Framework is also a useful tool for outreach and reporting efforts, as it aids in organizing this complex set of studies for reporting to a variety of audiences, depending on the level of interest and expertise of the audience. Session 13: Contributed Posters, Sun., Jan. 18, 11:40 to 1:40 p.m. and 6:00 to 7:00 p.m. CNPS 2009 Conservation Conference: Strategies and Solutions Page 1 of 197 ADAMS, SHERRY and Daniel Gluesenkamp, The Bouverie Preserve of Audubon Canyon Ranch, PO Box 1195, Glen Ellen, CA 95442; [email protected] DISTURBANCE AND VERNAL POOL GRASSLANDS Many California habitats experience disturbance regimes which differ from historic conditions. In particular, inland grasslands which once experienced regular burning and grazing now often have both processes excluded and suffer impacts from adjacent roadsides. Given the high conservation priority of these communities, it is important to understand how altered disturbance regimes affect community structure and abiotic factors. We must overcome political hurdles to restoring historic processes such as fire and grazing, as well as address the complexity of management issues, in a milieu of invasive species and human pressures such as roads. We present results of recent work at Bouverie Preserve in Sonoma Valley, site of a vernal pool grassland with a history of grazing which now abuts a busy highway. Our goals for the site include sustaining a diverse assemblage of native forbs and grasses, restoring degraded vernal pools, and reintroducing rare plants such as Blennosperma bakeri and Downingia pusilla. However, we also focus our management on the broader goals of restoring processes and structure. Our data show that the nearby roadside may impact plants via elevated nitrogen deposition; that maintaining a grazing program in an area with fragmented grasslands is a challenge; and that fire can be used to meet some management goals, such as reducing presence of annual grasses and exposing bare ground, but not others, such as reducing presence of non- native perennials. Session 13: Contributed Posters, Sun., Jan. 18, 11:40 to 1:40 p.m. and 6:00 to 7:00 p.m. AICHER, REBECCA and Katharine N. Suding; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of CA-Irvine, 5205 McGaugh Hall, Irvine, CA 92697; [email protected] COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY IN CA GRASSLANDS DIFFERS WITH SOIL NITROGEN Only one percent of native California grasslands remain intact. Human development pressures, global change and the spread of invasive species continue to threaten grassland diversity. We examined how biotic processes interact with soil nitrogen (N) conditions to determine the assembly trajectory in southern California grassland communities. We hypothesized: 1) negative frequency dependence (when a species performance decreases as it becomes more common) causes community-level convergence and 2) soil N availability affects the intensity of frequency dependence leading to differing assembly trajectories. We tested our hypotheses in 135 1m2 experimental annual grassland communities by varying the initial relative abundance of species CNPS 2009 Conservation Conference: Strategies and Solutions Page 2 of 197 through seed addition in 3 soil N levels. We measured species abundances through time. We found species growth rates were more likely to be negatively associated with initial seed frequency (negative frequency dependent) in high N environments. In high N, communities became more similar in composition than communities in ambient and low N environments. Based on our results, negative frequency dependence is important in determining the degree of convergence in community composition in N-enriched environments. Determining the frequency dependence in plant species and understanding soil N levels may aid in restoring native communities. For instance, native species that exhibit positive frequency dependence may be important for conservation strategies. Session 13: Contributed Posters, Sun., Jan. 18, 11:40 to 1:40 p.m. and 6:00 to 7:00 p.m. ALFORD, JIM and Jamie M. Kneitel, Department of Biological Sciences, CA State University, Sacramento, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, CA 95819-6077; [email protected] DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS OF A SPECIALIST HERBIVORE ON CORN LILY (VERATRUM CALIFORNICUM) IN A SUBALPINE MEADOW COMMUNITY Sub-alpine meadows are important ecosystems of the Sierra Nevada because of their high productivity, diversity, and endemism. Many studies indicate that soil moisture influences plant community dynamics and composition, but few studies have investigated the importance of “top down” factors, such as herbivore effects. Corn lily (Veratrum californicum) dominates many meadows and previous research indicated that it may compete strongly with other meadow plant species. However, Corn lilies are also suppressed by a specialist herbivore, larvae of the sawfly Rhadinoceraea aldrichi, which may then indirectly affect meadow biodiversity in a positive way. We conducted a fully factorial experiment which manipulated both soil moisture and herbivore presence in meadows located in the Van Vleck Meadow Restoration Site in the Eldorado National Forest. Reduction of Corn lilies increased light availability and water addition increased soil moisture. In turn, species responded variably to these treatments, but most species responded positively. Overall, meadow biodiversity increased with soil moisture and Corn lily reduction. Further, these treatments interacted to affect species diversity and cover. These results suggest that in addition to soil moisture, “top down” effects can also control meadow biodiversity. There has been considerable effort to restore meadow habitat; conservation strategies should also take into consideration these important factors to maintain the biodiversity of these important factors. Session 9: Assessing and Mitigating Impacts - Sensitive Plants and Communities, Sun. Jan. 18, 10 a.m. to 5:50 p.m. CNPS 2009 Conservation Conference: Strategies and Solutions Page 3 of 197 ALLEN, EDITH B., Leela E. Rao, Robert J. Steers, Mark E. Fenn, and Andrzej Bytnerowicz; Department of Botany and Plant Sciences (EA, RS), Department of Environmental Sciences (LR), and Center for Conservation Biology (EA), University of CA, Riverside, CA 92521-0124; [email protected], US Forest Service Fire Lab, 4955 Canyon Crest Dr., Riverside, CA 92507 (MF, AB) IMPACTS OF ANTHROPOGENIC NITROGEN DEPOSITION ON INVASIVE AND NATIVE SPECIES AT JOSHUA TREE NATIONAL PARK Joshua Tree National Park is downwind of anthropogenic nitrogen emissions from coastal and inland urban sources, especially automobiles, with higher rates of N deposition in the western than the eastern portions of the Park. Extractable soil N was also generally higher in sites that had higher atmospheric reactive N. Invasive grasses and forbs, such as Schismus barbatus, Bromus madritensis, and Erodium cicutarium have become more productive and widespread in the last few decades. To test the hypothesis that elevated N may be related to invasive species abundance, N fertilizer experiments were done at four sites in the Park at levels of 0, 5 and 30 kg N/ha. Sites with higher and lower N deposition were selected, including creosote bush scrub and pinyon-juniper woodland. Exotic grass biomass increased significantly with 30 kg N/ha at three of the four sites during a year with moderate precipitation, and under 5 kg N/ha during a year with high precipitation. The response of native forbs to fertilizer was related to the amount of exotic grass present initially. The richness of native forbs declined with fertilization at a site with high initial exotic grass cover, but native richness and cover increased
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGACY of the UC NATURAL RESERVE SYSTEM This Page Intentionally Left Blank the Environmental Legacy of the Uc Natural Reserve System
    THE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGACY OF THE UC NATURAL RESERVE SYSTEM This page intentionally left blank the environmental legacy of the uc natural reserve system edited by peggy l. fiedler, susan gee rumsey, and kathleen m. wong university of california press Berkeley Los Angeles London The publisher gratefully acknowledges the generous contri- bution to this book provided by the University of California Natural Reserve System. University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 2013 by The Regents of the University of California Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The environmental legacy of the UC natural reserve system / edited by Peggy L. Fiedler, Susan Gee Rumsey, and Kathleen M. Wong. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-520-27200-2 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Natural areas—California. 2. University of California Natural Reserve System—History. 3. University of California (System)—Faculty. 4. Environmental protection—California. 5. Ecology—Study and teaching— California. 6. Natural history—Study and teaching—California. I. Fiedler, Peggy Lee. II. Rumsey, Susan Gee. III. Wong, Kathleen M. (Kathleen Michelle) QH76.5.C2E59 2013 333.73'1609794—dc23 2012014651 Manufactured in China 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R 2002) (Permanence of Paper).
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego Capstone Papers
    UC San Diego Capstone Papers Title Developing a Draft Management Plan for the Dike Rock Intertidal Area Scripps Coastal Reserve, La Jolla, California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4c57b1bc Author Som, Marina Publication Date 2015-04-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California !"#"$%&'()*+*!,+-.*/+(+)"0"(.*1$+(*-%,*.2"*!'3"*4%53*6(.",.'7+$*8,"+* 95,'&&:*;%+:.+$*4":",#"* <+*=%$$+>*;+$'-%,('+* ! ! ! ! ! "#$%&#!'()! "#*+,$!(-!./0#&1,/!'+2/%,*! "#$%&,!3%(/%0,$%*+4!5!6(&*,$0#+%(&! '1$%77*!8&*+%+2+%(&!(-!91,#&(:$#7;4! <&%0,$*%+4!(-!6#=%-($&%#>!'#&!?%,:(! ! @2&,!ABCD! ! 6#7*+(&,!6())%++,,E! 8*#F,==,!G#4>!<&%0,$*%+4!(-!6#=%-($&%#!H#+2$#=!I,*,$0,!'4*+,)!J6;#%$K! @,&&%-,$!')%+;>!L;M?M>!'1$%77*!8&*+%+2+%(&!(-!91,#&(:$#7;4! ! !"#$%!&$' ! !"#$%&'())*$+,-*.-/$0#*#'1#$2%+03$(*$,4#$,5$67$'#*#'1#*$(4$."#$84(1#'*(.9$,5$+-/(5,'4(-$28+3$ :-.;'-/$0#*#'1#$%9*.#<$2:0%3$#*.-=/(*"#>$=9$."#$8+$?,-'>$,5$0#@#4.*$.,$*;)),'.$;4(1#'*(.9A/#1#/$ '#*#-'&"B$#>;&-.(,4B$-4>$);=/(&$*#'1(&#C$$D$.#4A9#-'$'#1(#E$2F-9$GHHI3$,5$."#$%+0$(>#4.(5(#>$."-.$ ."#$'#*#'1#$5-&#*$#J.#'4-/$."'#-.*$.,$(.*$/,4@A.#'<$1(-=(/(.9$5',<$"#-19$);=/(&$;*#B$)-'.(&;/-'/9$(4$ ."#$*",'#/(4#K<-'(4#$),'.(,4$,5$."#$%+0B$-4>$'#&,<<#4>#>$."-.$."#$8+$%-4$L(#@,$.-M#$-$ *.',4@#'$',/#$(4$)',.#&.(4@$."#$4-.;'-/$'#*,;'&#*$/,&-.#>$E(."(4$."#$%+0C$$!"(*$>'-5.$<-4-@#<#4.$ )/-4$"-*$=##4$>#1#/,)#>$5,'$."#$-))',J(<-.#/9$NA-&'#$-'#-$',&M9$(4.#'.(>-/$),'.(,4$,5$."#$%+0$ M4,E4$-*$L(M#$0,&MC$!"#$);'),*#$,5$."(*$>'-5.$<-4-@#<#4.$)/-4$(*$.,$)',1(>#$-$<#&"-4(*<$5,'$ ."#$(4.#@'-.(,4$,5$(45,'<-.(,4$-4>$-$*.';&.;'#$5,'$."#$)',.#&.(,4B$<-4-@#<#4.B$-4>$;*#$,5$."#$
    [Show full text]
  • UC Natural Reserve System Transect Publication 18:1
    University of California TransectS u m m e r 2 0 0 0 • Volume 18, No.1 A few words from the NRS systemwide office oday the NRS’s 33 reserve sites,* encompassing roughly T 130,000 acres, are protected and managed in support of teaching, research, and outreach activities. The only people who live there now are a handful of reserve personnel — mostly resident managers and stewards — who care for these wildlands, their resources and facilities, and who enable the teaching and research to continue across California. But this was not always the case. Long before even the concept of Cali- fornia, other people lived out their lives on these lands. Hundreds and thou- sands of years ago, other people were finding ways to feed, clothe, shelter, Photo by Susan Gee Rumsey and protect themselves, trying their The past is nonrenewable: Continued on page 32 Natural reserves protect rich cultural resources 4 Firsthand impressions of a Santa Cruz Island dig ’ve done research at the UC Natural Reserve System’s site on Santa Cruz Island for over 20 years, including archaeological field schools (10 summers) 7 Archaeology sheds light on and National Science Foundation-supported research (6 years) since 1985. I Big Creek mussel mystery I also did my Ph.D. on the island (1980-83) and recorded the major chert quar- 17 Of mammoths and men ries of El Montañon and the microblade production industries in the China Harbor area. 20 Picturing the past in the East Mojave Desert Santa Cruz Island is a remarkable place, and its pre-European cultural resources 25 And a useful glossary of are among the most important and exceptionally well-preserved in the United anthropology terms, too! States.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo Thornmint (Acanthomintha Duttonii) Restoration Project
    San Mateo Thornmint (Acanthomintha duttonii) Restoration Project Status Report, December 2015 Christal Niederer Creekside Center for Earth Observation 27 Bishop Lane Menlo Park, CA 94025 www.creeksidescience.com Executive Summary San Mateo thornmint seeding took place December 2014. Funded through a CitizenInvestor effort spearheaded by the San Mateo County Parks Foundation, 30 square meter plots were seeded with 250 seeds each (7500 seeds total). By May 2015, the total population of thornmint increased from 608 to 1134. The increase, while positive, is smaller than the increase that took place after previous seeding efforts. Plants that did survive, however, were relatively large and robust, probably due to some supplemental irrigation. Space occupied reached its highest amount since the project began. While San Mateo thornmint still persists, and the total population increased in 2015 compared with 2014, numbers have not increased to historic highs, and are below the USFWS-approved goal of 5000 or more individuals. Many believe the current site may no longer be able to support a self- sustaining San Mateo thornmint population because of changed hydrology (a vee ditch on Hillcrest Road likely diverts sheet flow away from the site), invasion of nonnative grasses (possibly a relic from nitrogen inputs from uphill septic tanks), or other factors. In any case, a small, single site is vulnerable to climate change or stochastic events. Additional introductions to San Francisco Water Power and Sewer (aka San Francisco Public Utilities Commission) property continue to stall. With funding from Friends of Edgewood, additional serpentine vertisol sites at Edgewood were mapped and prioritized. In December 2015, the top four sites (including the existing site) received 5000 seeds, for a total of 20,000 seeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Point Loma Ocean Outfall
    APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF NPDES CA0107409 and 301(h) MODIFIED SECONDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS Point Loma Ocean Outfall VOLUMEV APPENDICES G thru I City of San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater Department November 2007 Application for Renewal of NPDES CA0107409 & 301(h) Modified Secondary Treatment Requirements for Biochemical Oxygen Demand and Total Suspended Solids POINT LOMA OCEAN OUTFALL & POINT LOMA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Submitted under provisions of Section 301(h) of the Clean Water Act City of San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater Department 9192 Topaz Way San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 292-6401 November 2007 (updated) APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF NPDES CA0107409 & 301(h) MODIFIEDSECONDARY TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS CITY OF SAN DIEGO POINT LOMA OCEAN OUTFALL November 2007 VOLUME V TECHNICAL APPENDICES G through I Appendix G Beneficial Uses Assessment Appendix H Endangered Species Appendix I Proposed Monitoring Program LIST OF VOLUMES Volume I Executive Summary Volume II Part 1 - Basis of Application Part 2 - NPDES Application Forms Part 3 - Antidegradation Analysis Volume III Large Applicant Questionnaire Volume IV Appendix A Metro System Facilities and Operations Appendix B Point Loma Ocean Outfall Appendix C Compliance with Water Contact Standards Appendix D Effluent Disinfection Evaluation Appendix E Benthic Sediments and Organisms Appendix F Bioaccumulation Assessment Volume V Appendix G Beneficial Use Assessment Appendix H Endangered Species Appendix I Proposed Monitoring Program Volume VI Appendix J 2006 Annual Biosolids Report Volume
    [Show full text]
  • Foothill Yellow-Legged Frog Comments
    The Center for Biological Diversity submits the following information for the status review of the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii) (Docket #FWS-R8-ES-2015-0050), including substantial new information regarding the species' biology, population structure (including potential Distinct Population Segments of the species), historical and recent distribution and status, population trends, documented range contraction, habitat requirements, threats to the species and its habitat, disease, and the potential effects of climate change on the species and its habitat. The foothill yellow-legged frog has experienced extensive population declines throughout its range and a significant range contraction. Multiple threats continue unabated throughout much of the species’ remaining range, including impacts from dams, water development, water diversions, timber harvest, mining, marijuana cultivation, livestock grazing, roads and urbanization, recreation, climate change and UV-radiation, pollution, invasive species and disease. The species warrants listing as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Contact: Jeff Miller, [email protected] Contents: NATURAL HISTORY, BIOLOGY AND STATUS . .. 2 Biology. .2 Habitat . .. .4 Range and Documented Range Contraction . 4 Taxonomy . 9 Population Structure . 9 Historical and Recent Distribution and Status . 15 Central Oregon . .15 Southern Oregon . 18 Coastal Oregon . .20 Northern Coastal California . 25 Upper Sacramento River . 40 Marin/Sonoma . 45 Northern/Central Sierra Nevada . .47 Southern Sierra Nevada . .67 Central Coast/Bay Area . 77 South Coast. 91 Southern California . .. 94 Baja California, Mexico . .98 Unknown Population Affiliation. .99 Population Trends . .. .103 THREATS. .108 Habitat Alteration and Destruction . .. 108 Dams, Water Development and Diversions . .. .109 Logging . .. .111 Marijuana Cultivation . .. .112 Livestock Grazing . .. .112 Mining . .. .. .113 Roads and Urbanization .
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Reserve System Map Flyer
    Natural Reserve System Natural Reserve System UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA university of california 1111 Franklin St., 6th Floor Oakland, CA 94607-5200 The UC Natural Reserve System provides a nrs.ucop.edu library of ecosystems throughout California. Reserves offer outdoor laboratories to field scientists, classrooms without walls for students, and nature’s inspiration to all. Founded in 1965 to provide a network of wildland sites available for scientific study, the NRS has grown to include more than 40 locations encompassing more than 756,000 acres across the state. The NRS is the world’s largest university- Reserves are listed by administering campus operated system of natural reserves; no Berkeley Los Angeles San Diego other network of field sites can match its 1 Angelo Coast Range Reserve 15 Stunt Ranch Santa Monica 25 Dawson Los Monos LOBSANG WANGDU size, scope, and ecological diversity. 2 Blue Oak Ranch Reserve Mountains Reserve Canyon Reserve 3 Chickering American River Reserve 16 White Mountain Research Center 26 Elliott Chaparral Reserve 4 Hastings Natural History Merced 27 Kendall-Frost Mission Bay Reservation Marsh Reserve Sierra Nevada Research Stations: 5 Jenny Pygmy Forest Reserve 28 Scripps Coastal Reserve 17 Merced Vernal Pools and 6 Sagehen Creek Field Station Grassland Reserve Santa Barbara 29 Carpinteria Salt Marsh Reserve Davis 18 Yosemite Field Station 30 Coal Oil Point Natural Reserve 7 Bodega Marine Reserve Riverside 31 Kenneth S. Norris Rancho 8 Jepson Prairie Reserve 19 Box Springs Reserve Marino Reserve 9 McLaughlin
    [Show full text]
  • Grasslands-Vernal Pool Natural Reserve
    GRASSLANDS-VERNAL POOL NATURAL RESERVE CAMPUS EVALUATION University of California, Merced 2012 WORKING DRAFT University of California, Merced 5200 N. Lake Road Merced, California 95343 www.ucmerced.edu This document was prepared for use by the UC Natural Reserve System. Questions regarding data, management structure and budget should be directed to UC Merced’s Sierra Nevada Research Institute, http://snri.ucmerced.edu. Published 2012 UC Merced Physical Planning, Design and Construciton GRASSLANDS-VERNAL POOL NATURAL RESERVE CAMPUS EVALUATION University of California, Merced 2012 WORKING DRAFT CONTENTS 4 I. PROPOSED NAME 6 II. REGIONAL SETTING 8 III. LOCATION, SIZE AND OWNERSHIP 10 IV. SITE EVALUATION 12 V. CAMPUS COMMITTMENT 24 VI. RECOMMENDATION 26 5 I PROPOSED NAME: GRASSLANDS-VERNAL POOL NATURAL RESERVE In 1965, the University of California Natural Reserve System (NRS) began to assemble a system of protected sites for scientific study that would broadly represent California’s rich ecological diversity. By creating this system of “outdoor classrooms” and laboratories and making it available specifically for long-term study, the NRS supports a variety of disciplines that require fieldwork in wildland ecosystems. Natural Reserve System Today: Largest University Natural Reserve System in the World The mission of the Natural Reserve System Today, the NRS network includes 38 sites encompassing more than 750,000 acres across twelve ecological regions is to contribute to the in one of the most physiographically diverse regions in the understanding and wise United States. stewardship of the Earth and its natural systems by The reserves vary in size, remoteness, degree of human supporting university-level impact, and ability to support use.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast Region Report
    CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENT Central Coast Region Report Coordinating Agencies: CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENT Introduction to California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment alifornia is a global leader in using, investing in, and advancing research to set proactive climate change policy, and its Climate Change Assessments provide the scientifc foundation for understanding climate- related vulnerability at the local scale and informing resilience actions. The Climate Change Assessments directly inform State policies, plans, programs, and guidance to promote effective and integrated action to Csafeguard California from climate change. California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment (Fourth Assessment) advances actionable science that serves the growing needs of state and local-level decision-makers from a variety of sectors. Tis cutting-edge research initiative is comprised of a wide-ranging body of technical reports, including rigorous, comprehensive climate change scenarios at a scale suitable for illuminating regional vulnerabilities and localized adaptation strategies in California; datasets and tools that improve integration of observed and projected knowledge about climate change into decision- making; and recommendations and information to directly inform vulnerability assessments and adaptation strategies for California’s energy sector, water resources and management, oceans and coasts, forests, wildfres, agriculture, biodiversity and habitat, and public health. In addition, these technical reports have been distilled into summary reports and a brochure, allowing the public and decision-makers to easily access relevant fndings from the Fourth Assessment. • A concise summary of the Fourth Assessment’s most important fndings and conclusions. • An in-depth report on how California’s people, built KEY FINDINGS environment, and ecosystems will be impacted by climate change and how we can proactively adapt, based on the Fourth Assessment’s fndings.
    [Show full text]
  • NRS Personnel Directory Paul Aigner James M. Andre Feynner Arias
    NRS Personnel Directory As of September 17, 2015 Paul Aigner Campus: UC Davis Title: Resident Co-Director Email: [email protected] Work phone: 707 995-9005 Reserve: McLaughlin Natural Reserve Fax phone: 707 995-9005 (call first) Cell phone: Other phone: Mail: McLaughlin Natural Reserve FedEx: 26775 Morgan Valley Road Lower Lake, CA 95457 James M. Andre Campus: UC Riverside Title: Reserve Director Email: [email protected] Work phone: 760 733-4222 Reserve: Sweeney Granite Mountains Desert Research Center Fax phone: 760 733-9931 Cell phone: 951 312-3556 Other phone: Mail: Sweeney Granite Mtns Desert Research Ctr. FedEx: 909 Armory Road #118 HC1 Box 101 Barstow, CA 92311-5460 Kelso, CA 92351-0101 Feynner Arias Campus: UC Santa Cruz Title: Reserve Steward Email: [email protected] Work phone: 831 667-2543 Reserve: Landels-Hill Big Creek Reserve Fax phone: 831 667-2543 (call first) Cell phone: Other phone: Mail: Landels-Hill Big Creek Reserve FedEx: 58801 Highway 1 Big Sur, CA 93920 Anne Barrett Campus: UC Santa Barbara Title: Education Coordinator Email: [email protected] Work phone: 805-893-5655 Reserve: Valentine Eastern Sierra Reserve SNARL Fax phone: Cell phone: 760-937-4155 Other phone: Mail: 1016 Mount Morrison Road FedEx: Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546 Virginia Boucher Campus: UC Davis Title: Associate Director UCD NRS Email: [email protected] Work phone: 530 752-6949 Reserve: Jepson Prairie Reserve Fax phone: 530 754-9141 Quail Ridge Reserve Stebbins Cold Canyon Reserve Cell phone: 530 574-3782 Other phone: Mail: NRS/JMIE, The Barn FedEx: One Shields Avenue University of California Davis, CA 95616 Please send additions, deletions or changes to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Protected Areas of Washington, Oregon, and California Compiled
    Marine Protected Areas of Washington, Oregon, and California compiled by Al J. Didier, Jr. Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission 45 SE 82nd Drive, Suite 100 Gladstone, OR 97027-2522 December 1998 Conducted under Contract No. 98-08 from the Pacific Fishery Management Council LIST OF TABLES Table 1. National marine sanctuaries of California, Oregon, and Washington. .............................6 Table 2. National Wildlife Refuges and Wilderness Areas of coastal California, Oregon, and Washington. ....................................................................................................................7 Table 3. National parks and monuments of coastal California, Oregon, and Washington. ............8 Table 4. Marine protected areas designated by state and local governments in California ..........10 Table 5. Marine protected areas designated by state and local governments in Oregon..............19 Table 6. Marine protected areas designated by state and local governments in Washington. ......21 Table 7. National Estuarine Research Reserves of coastal California, Oregon, and Washington. 27 Table 8. National Estuary Program sites of coastal California, Oregon, and Washington. ..........28 Table 9. UNESCO MAB Biosphere Reserve sites of coastal California, Oregon, and Washington.29 Table 10. Nearshore submarine cable segments off the coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington. ..................................................................................................................30 Table 11. Coordinates (decimal degrees)
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Serpentine Soil Species of the San Francisco Bay Area
    Recovery Plan for Serpentine Soil Species of the San Francisco Bay Area from Richard A Arnold. with permission San Mateo woolly sunflower Bakers manzanita from Hickman 1993, with permission from Abrams 1951 with permission RECOVERY PLAN FOR SERPENTINE SOIL SPECIES OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA Authors: Diane R. Elam (Plant Species Accounts) David H. Wright (Bay Checkerspot Butterfly, Opler’s Longhorn Moth, and Harvestmen Species Accounts) Bradley Goettle (Opler’s Longhorn Moth and Harvestmen Species Accounts) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office Additional Contributors: Jason Davis (Species Location Maps and introduction) Gary Faixa (Draft Bay Checkerspot Butterfly Species Account) Liz Molacek (GIS mapping) Approved: Manager, Date: DISCLAIMER PAGE Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams. contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and an~ necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views, official positions, or approval ofany individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only afier they have been signed by the Regional Director, Manager, or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species statuses, and the completion of recovery tasks.
    [Show full text]