DOCSLIB.ORG

Feasibility Study of a Campus-Based Bikesharing Program at UNLV Hualiang Teng University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feasibility Study of a Campus-Based Bikesharing Program at UNLV Hualiang Teng University of Nevada, Las Vegas San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Mineta Transportation Institute Publications 7-2017 Feasibility Study of a Campus-Based Bikesharing Program at UNLV Hualiang Teng University of Nevada, Las Vegas Boniphace Kutela University of Nevada, Las Vegas Eneliko Mulokozi University of Nevada, Las Vegas Bingyi Hu Beijing Jiaotong University Yang Jiao University of Nevada, Las Vegas See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/mti_publications Part of the Transportation Commons Recommended Citation Hualiang Teng, Boniphace Kutela, Eneliko Mulokozi, Bingyi Hu, Yang Jiao, and Haiqing Li. "Feasibility Study of a Campus-Based Bikesharing Program at UNLV" Mineta Transportation Institute Publications (2017). This Report is brought to you for free and open access by SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mineta Transportation Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Hualiang Teng, Boniphace Kutela, Eneliko Mulokozi, Bingyi Hu, Yang Jiao, and Haiqing Li This report is available at SJSU ScholarWorks: http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/mti_publications/232 MNTRC Study: A Study Factors of that Transit Detroit Regional Enable Inhibit and Effective Transit Regional Report MNTRC 12-22 MINETA NATIONAL TRANSIT RESEARCH CONSORTIUM Funded by U.S. Department of Transportation Feasibility Study of a Campus-Based Bikesharing Program at UNLV MNTRC Report 12-64 March 2014 March MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER LEAD UNIVERSITY OF MNTRC Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) was established by Congress in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation MTI/MNTRC BOARD OF TRUSTEES Equity Act (ISTEA) and was reauthorized under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century (TEA-21). MTI then successfully competed to be named a Tier 1 Center in 2002 and 2006 in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Founder, Honorable Norman Joseph Boardman (Ex-Officio) Diane Woodend Jones (TE 2019) Richard A. White (Ex-Officio) Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). Most recently, MTI successfully competed in the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011 to Mineta (Ex-Officio) Chief Executive Officer Principal and Chair of Board Interim President and CEO be named a Tier 1 Transit-Focused University Transportation Center. The Institute is funded by Congress through the United States Secretary (ret.), US Department of Amtrak Lea+Elliot, Inc. American Public Transportation Transportation Association (APTA) Department of Transportation’s Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Vice Chair Anne Canby (TE 2017) Will Kempton (TE 2019) Centers Program, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and by private grants and donations. Hill & Knowlton, Inc. Director Executive Director Bud Wright (Ex-Officio) OneRail Coalition Transportation California Executive Director Honorary Chair, Honorable Bill American Association of State The Institute receives oversight from an internationally respected Board of Trustees whose members represent all major surface Shuster (Ex-Officio) Donna DeMartino (TE 2018) Art Leahy (TE 2018) Highway and Transportation Officials Chair General Manager and CEO CEO (AASHTO) transportation modes. MTI’s focus on policy and management resulted from a Board assessment of the industry’s unmet needs House Transportation and San Joaquin Regional Transit District Metrolink and led directly to the choice of the San José State University College of Business as the Institute’s home. The Board provides Infrastructure Committee Edward Wytkind (Ex-Officio) United States House of William Dorey (TE 2017) Jean-Pierre Loubinoux (Ex-Officio) President policy direction, assists with needs assessment, and connects the Institute and its programs with the international transportation Representatives Board of Directors Director General Transportation Trades Dept., community. Granite Construction, Inc. International Union of Railways AFL-CIO Honorary Co-Chair, Honorable (UIC) Peter DeFazio (Ex-Officio) Malcolm Dougherty (Ex-Officio) MTI’s transportation policy work is centered on three primary responsibilities: Vice Chair Director Abbas Mohaddes (TE 2018) (TE) = Term Expiration or Ex-Officio House Transportation and California Department of CEO * = Past Chair, Board of Trustee Infrastructure Committee Transportation The Mohaddes Group United States House of Research Representatives Mortimer Downey* (TE 2018) Jeff Morales (TE 2019) MTI works to provide policy-oriented research for all levels of sity system. With the active assistance of the California President CEO Chair, Nuria Fernandez Mort Downey Consulting, LLC California High-Speed Rail Authority government and the private sector to foster the development Department of Transportation, MTI delivers its classes over (TE 2017) of optimum surface transportation systems. Research areas in- a state-of-the-art videoconference network throughout General Manager and CEO Rose Guilbault (TE 2017) Beverley Swaim-Staley (TE 2019) Valley Transportation Board Member President clude: transportation security; planning and policy development; the state of California and via webcasting beyond, allowing Authority Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Union Station Redevelopment interrelationships among transportation, land use, and the working transportation professionals to pursue an advanced Board (Caltrain) Corporation environment; transportation finance; and collaborative labor- degree regardless of their location. To meet the needs of Vice Chair, Grace Crunican (TE 2019) Ed Hamberger (Ex-Officio) Michael Townes* (TE 2017) management relations. Certified Research Associates conduct employers seeking a diverse workforce, MTI’s education General Manager President/CEO President the research. Certification requires an advanced degree, gener- program promotes enrollment to under-represented groups. Bay Area Rapid Transit District Association of American Railroads Michael S. Townes, LLC ally a Ph.D., a record of academic publications, and profession- Executive Director, Steve Heminger* (TE 2018) Marlene Turner, Ph.D. (Ex-Officio) al references. Research projects culminate in a peer-reviewed Information and Technology Transfer Karen Philbrick, Ph.D. Executive Director Interim Dean, College of Business Mineta Transportation Institute Metropolitan Transportation San José State University publication, available both in hardcopy and on TransWeb, MTI promotes the availability of completed research to San José State University Commission the MTI website (http://transweb.sjsu.edu). professional organizations and journals and works to integrate the research findings into the graduate education Education program. In addition to publishing the studies, the Institute Directors The educational goal of the Institute is to provide graduate-lev- also sponsors symposia to disseminate research results el education to students seeking a career in the development to transportation professionals and encourages Research and operation of surface transportation programs. MTI, through Associates to present their findings at conferences. The Karen Philbrick, Ph.D. Hilary Nixon, Ph.D. Ben Tripousis Executive Director Research and Technology World in Motion, MTI’s quarterly newsletter, covers National High-Speed Rail Connectivity Center San José State University, offers an AACSB-accredited Master of Transfer Director Science in Transportation Management and a graduate Certifi- innovation in the Institute’s research and education pro- Peter Haas, Ph.D. Asha Weinstein Agrawal, Ph.D. cate in Transportation Management that serve to prepare the na- grams. MTI’s extensive collection of transportation-related Education Director Brian Michael Jenkins National Transportation Finance Center tion’s transportation managers for the 21st century. The master’s publications is integrated into San José State University’s National Transportation Safety and Security Center degree is the highest conferred by the California State Univer- world-class Martin Luther King, Jr. Library. DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the information presented MNTRC herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program and the California Department of Transportation, in the interest of information exchange. This report does not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. government, State of California, or the Mineta Transportation Institute, who assume no liability MINETA NATIONAL TRANSIT for the contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard specification, design standard, or regulation. RESEARCH CONSORTIUM REPORT 12-64 FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A CAMPUS-BASED BIKESHARING PROGRAM AT UNLV Hualiang (Harry) Teng, PhD Boniphace Kutela Eneliko Mulokozi Bingyi Hu, PhD Yang Jiao Haiqing Li July 2017 A publication of Mineta National Transit Reseaerch Consortium College of Business San José State University San José, CA 95192-0219 TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. CA-MNTRC-16-1248 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Feasibility Study of a Campus-Based Bikesharing Program at UNLV July 2017 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shared Mobility Systems Gilbert Laporte, Frédéric Meunier, Roberto Wolfler Calvo
    Shared mobility systems Gilbert Laporte, Frédéric Meunier, Roberto Wolfler Calvo To cite this version: Gilbert Laporte, Frédéric Meunier, Roberto Wolfler Calvo. Shared mobility systems. 4OR: A Quar- terly Journal of Operations Research, Springer Verlag, 2015, 13 (4), pp.341-360. 10.1007/s10288-015- 0301-z. hal-01792763 HAL Id: hal-01792763 https://hal-enpc.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01792763 Submitted on 15 May 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. SHARED MOBILITY SYSTEMS GILBERT LAPORTE, FRED´ ERIC´ MEUNIER, AND ROBERTO WOLFLER CALVO Abstract. Shared mobility systems for bicycles and cars have grown in popularity in recent years and have attracted the attention of the operational research community. Researchers have investigated several problems arising at the strategic, tactical and operational levels. This survey paper classifies the relevant literature under five main headings: station location, fleet dimensioning, station inventory, rebalancing incentives, and vehicle repositioning. It closes with some open research questions. Key words: survey, shared mobility systems, bicycle and car sharing, fleet dimensioning, inventory rebalancing, vehicle repositioning. 1. Introduction The world of transportation has witnessed a mini-revolution in June 2007 with the launch- ing of the V´elib'bicycle sharing system in Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a 21St Century Cycling City: Strategies for Action in Toronto
    Green Prosperity Papers Building a 21st Century Cycling City: Strategies for Action in Toronto — by Trudy Ledsham and Dr. Beth Savan January 2017 Metcalf Foundation Acknowledgements Methodology The mission of The George Cedric Metcalf This paper, from the Metcalf Green To develop, inform and refine the issues Charitable Foundation is to enhance the Prosperity Series, was made possible and recommendations in this report, a effectiveness of people and organizations through the financial support of the Metcalf series of consultations with local, national, working together to help Canadians imagine Foundation as well as by the generous and international bicycling experts were and build a just, healthy, and creative sharing of time and knowledge by our carried out during the summer of 2015. society. reviewers and advisors. Experts in the field including academic transportation researchers, academic and Local Advisors/Reviewers: Nancy Smith municipal planners, public health experts Beth Savan Lea, Dan Egan, Dave McLaughlin, Adam and active transportation advocates were Popper, Jacqueline Hayward Gulati, Carol invited to participate. We undertook a Beth Savan, Ph.D., an award-winning Mee, Jared Kolb, and Kristin Schwartz. three-stage process: initially local experts teacher, scholar and broadcaster, is were gathered for a discussion based on a appointed to the faculty of the School of National/international Advisors/ series of questions (Appendix A) to Environment at the University of Toronto, Reviewers: Ralph Buehler, Kevin stimulate thoughts and provide direction where she served as the inaugural Manaugh, Marco Te Brommelstroet, Ray for the report. This wide ranging discussion Sustainability Director at the St. George Tomalty, Meghan Winters, and Andrew led to detailed research and the draft of a campus.
    [Show full text]
  • PSC Agenda Packet
    Sacramento Area Council of Governments Regional Bike Share Policy Steering Committee Friday, August 28, 2020, 2:00 to 4:00p.m. Meeting Information: https://zoom.us/j/91955231855 You can also dial in using your phone: Dial‐in #: 888‐475‐4499 Webinar ID: 919 5523 1855 Upon entry into the meeting please type your name for attendance. Timed items are estimates only and may be taken up by the committee at any time. The Policy Steering Committee may take up any agenda item at any time, regardless of the order listed. Public comment will be taken on the item at the time that it is taken up by the committee. We ask that members of the public complete a request to speak form, submit it to the clerk of the committee, and keep their remarks brief. If several persons wish to address the committee on a single item, the chair may impose a time limit on individual remarks at the beginning of the discussion. Action may be taken on any item on this agenda. (2:00) Roll Call: Ayala, Cabaldon, Frerichs, Hansen, Harris, Trost (2:05) Public Communications: Any person wishing to address the committee on any item not on the agenda may do so at this time. After ten minutes of testimony, any additional testimony will be heard following the action items. (2:10) Action 1. Approve Assignment of JUMP Program Agreement to Lime (Ms. Bradbury) (2:40) Information and Discussion 2. An Overview of Bike Share System Operating Structures (Ms. Bradbury) (3:30) Other Matters (3:45) Next Meeting and Adjournment This agenda and attachments are available on SACOG’s website at www.sacog.org.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Ontario Bike Summit Agenda (Updated: April 15, 2016) "What's Next for Cycling" - #OBS16
    2016 Ontario Bike Summit Agenda (updated: April 15, 2016) "What's Next for Cycling" - #OBS16 Summit Venue: Eaton Chelsea Hotel 33 Gerrard Street West, Toronto, ON Tuesday, April 19, 2016 Pre-Summit Sessions 9 to 4.30pm (Hotel Lobby) Registration Open 10 to 1pm Toronto Bike Ride and Tour (Sold Old) (Meet at Hotel Bay Street Entrance) o Mobile workshop and discussion led by Jacquelyn Hayward Gulati, Cycling Infrastructure & Programs Manager and City of Toronto staff. Explore some of downtown Toronto's newest cycling infrastructure including separated bike lanes on Wellesley Street and Sherbourne Street, contraflow lanes on Simcoe Street and the Waterfront Trail's multi-use paths. Bikes will be provided by Bike Share Toronto. 2 to 5pm (Gerrard Room) Bicycle Friendly Communities Seminar (max. 60 participants) o The Bicycle Friendly Community Award (BFC) Program provides incentives, hands-on assistance, and award recognition for communities that actively support bicycling. Join this ever-popular in-depth session for participants looking to learn more about the BFC program, from submitting your first application to moving up the ranks. This year’s seminar theme is “Lighter, Quicker, Cheaper” and we will be exploring high-impact, low cost projects that have been implemented across Canada to create more bicycle-friendly communities. 5 to 6pm (Gerrard Room) Committee ‘Speed Dating’: Get to Know Professionals at Work, Hosted by APBP o Ever want to know who’s doing what in Ontario for cycling? This session, hosted by the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (Ontario Chapter) is a chance to find out about various committees working to advance cycling in Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Regional Bike Sharing: Human-Scaled Mobility and Transit Integration in Urban Growth Centres
    Planning for Regional Bike Sharing: Human-scaled Mobility and Transit Integration in Urban Growth Centres by Scott Hays supervised by Laura Taylor A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Environmental Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Studies York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2 August 2018 Abstract This paper argues that an integrated approach to bike sharing program implementation can yield considerably higher benefits than bike sharing operations in isolation, and can improve transit systems and urban design alike. This paper draws from literature on the Sustainable Transportation paradigm, New Urbanism and Smart Growth to argue that a transit-integrated regional approach to bike sharing can greatly contribute to a seamless regional transit system, while yielding significant benefits to local urban design and mobility as well. Such an approach can significantly enhance transit’s competitiveness against the automobile, enabling transit-oriented designs of Urban Growth Centres that mitigate autocentric suburban sprawl. Employing this approach to GO Transit’s upcoming Regional Express Rail (RER) and the Urban Growth Centres of the GGH can facilitate the complete communities desired in the Provincial Growth Plan to advance the GGH’s polycentric urban network. The incorporation of bike sharing systems (BSSs) into regional transportation planning approaches provides the link that connects the regional with the local just as it connects the user from their door to the transit station. To realize its full potential in multimodal chains, bike sharing requires a high level of integration with the anchoring transit system in order to make it convenient and competitive against the personal automobile.
    [Show full text]
  • Bike Share Toronto Request for Proposal
    PA13.1 Appendix D APPENDIX D: BIKE SHARE TORONTO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Bike Share Toronto Request for Proposal Release Date: July 29, 2015 Response Due Date: August 26, 2015 Version: 1.0 Copyright Copyright © Toronto Parking Authority. This document is unpublished and the foregoing notice is affixed to protect Toronto Parking Authority in the event of inadvertent publication. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, including photocopying or transmission electronically to any computer, without prior written consent of Toronto Parking Authority. This document and the information contained in it are the property of Toronto Parking Authority and may not be used or disclosed except as expressly authorised in writing by Toronto Parking Authority. Trademarks Bike Share Toronto is a trademark of the Toronto Parking Authority. iOS is a trademark of Apple Corporation. Android is a trademark of Google Inc. Other product names mentioned in this document may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies and are hereby acknowledged. Table of Contents Schedule A – Glossary ..................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Company Overview ................................................................................... 5 1.1.1 Toronto Parking Authority .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Private Data Islands Or Public Data Oasis?
    Private data islands or public data oasis? Why cities need mandatory mobility APIs. 1 SPRING 2019 Executive summary Public, real-time Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) are critical pieces of data infrastructure that facilitate multimodal, multi-operator trips, promote a fair and competitive mobility marketplace, and enable the public to help determine whether a public mobility program’s goals are being met. While NGOs have drafted initial principles that promote public APIs for services that operate on public streets, there is still a lack of specific guidance about how to require these important open real-time feeds. With this policy paper, we point to specific examples as best practices for public, real-time API policies. We also look to the future, envisioning what mobility APIs can achieve beyond simply conveying real-time availability information, with a focus on the evolution of payment APIs. Our enlightened self-interest It’s true: our app exists because of public APIs from transit agencies and mobility operators. While Transit benefits from open APIs, so do other companies — and the general public. Open transport data has led to an entire generation of consumer apps that turn real-time data into useful tools for riders. Requiring public APIs from services that operate on public streets extends a mobility tradition that’s open and fair, while promoting innovation and competition. 1 What are public, real-time APIs? A public, real-time Application Programming Interface (API) allows a mobility operator to provide universal access to real-time information about their service, using a standard data format. Translation: a transit, ridehail, bikeshare, scooter or carshare operator can use a public, real-time API to provide information about where it has vehicles available for use, or when its service is going to arrive, opening up information so potential riders can find and use the service.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton Shared Micro-Mobility
    Appendix "A" to Report PED20109(c) Page 1 of 53 Final Report Hamilton Shared Micro-Mobility Assessment of Operating Models, Funding Sources, and Role of Not-For-Profit Organizations Prepared for City of Hamilton by IBI Group November 5, 2020 IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT Appendix "A" to Report PED20109(c) HAMILTON SHARED MICRO-MOBILITY Page 2 of 53 Prepared for City of Hamilton Executive Summary Since 2015, Hamilton’s bike share program has been an integral part of the way residents and visitors move around the city. It is the only public bike share in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) outside Toronto and has been recognized by the Transportation Association of Canada and Canada Clean 50 as a model for sustainable urban transportation. As of early 2020 prior to the pandemic, some 5% of Hamiltonians, nearly 27,000 people, are active members and they make over 30,000 trips a month. As the micro-mobility market has evolved with the entry of venture-funded companies, dockless technologies, and electric vehicles, the program now operates in a very different environment from when it launched. Adding to the urgency for change, Uber’s decision to cease operating the system as of June 2020, the lack of penalties for breaking that contract, and the lack of dedicated sources for operating funds together put the system in a precarious state. This study is intended to identify the most suitable operating model to provide sustainable shared micro-mobility in Hamilton and leverage the wide range of new technologies in the market, as well as identify suitable non-tax-based funding sources, and potential expansion areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Program Book (PDF)
    “Access to safe, reliable transportation is a question of social justice. Our work gives us the opportunity to uplift the needs of people who were historically marginalized by unacceptable past planning practices. Establishing equity as a cornerstone means accelerating our efforts in neighborhoods where access to a job, to I am honoured to welcome you to Toronto for the National Association of City school, healthcare, childcare, and every life need matters most.” Transportation Officials’ 2019 Designing Cities conference. Toronto is Canada’s largest city and North America’s fourth largest with 2.9 million residents. Our city is a global centre for business, technology and innovation, finance, arts and Robin Hutcheson culture and we continue to strive to be a model of sustainable development. I Director of Public Works, Minneapolis encourage you to enjoy Toronto, learn about our diverse neighbourhoods and NACTO Vice President explore our vibrant streets. The conference represents a tremendous opportunity for the City of Toronto to share our unique insights and accomplishments as Canada’s largest city. Through concerted efforts, the City of Toronto has become a city of global renown by providing a transportation system that is safe and reliable and supports our strong and diverse economy. Since 2016, Toronto has committed to making its streets safer by prioritizing the safety of our most vulnerable road users with the implementation of the Vision Zero Road Safety Plan. Our latest phase of Vision Zero, adopted unanimously by City Council in July 2019, continues this commitment by taking targeted, proactive actions, such as a speed management strategy to reduce the speed limits on most City streets, and the introduction of automated speed enforcement to target dangerous driving near schools.
    [Show full text]
  • For New Residents and Fellows at the University of Toronto
    MAY 2020 Orientationfor New Residents and Fellows at the University of Toronto Social Media ............................................................ 2 5. During Training ........................................................ 31 In-Training Evaluation Reports (ITERS) ................................ 31 ......................................................... 4 PGME Contact Research Ethics Module for Clinical Fellows ........................ 32 Introduction . ............................................................. 5 Fellowship Education Advisory Committee (FEAC) ................ 33 Completion of Training Certificate ....................................... 34 1. Registration ............................................................... 6 Process Overview ............................................................... 6 6. Banking ....................................................................... 35 Letter of Appointment ........................................................ 6 College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario ..................... 7 CPSO Requirement for Source Verification 7. Accommodation ....................................................... 36 of Medical Degree ........................................................ 8 Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA) ................. 9 8. Transportation ........................................................... 38 Getting a Social Insurance Number (SIN) ............................ 9 Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Technology and New Mobility Options: City of Guelph
    Transportation Technology and New Mobility Options City of Guelph Transportation Master Plan Background Paper Series Guelph Transportation Master Plan Moving Guelph Forward Guelph is growing and how we move This paper is part of a series of around our city is changing. As a result, background papers intended to we are exploring transportation options communicate information, key trends, to make our city move better in every and concepts. These will form the way. Through the Transportation Master foundation of and set the strategic Plan (TMP) update, we will review all direction for our updated TMP. The of the ways we move: walking, cycling, papers are intended to support riding transit, driving, trucking, and conversations in the community and using trains. Our goal is to ensure that within City Hall about how we plan for we offer diverse travel options, have the future of mobility. appropriate transportation capacity, and maintain a high quality of life for The series includes the following both existing and future residents and papers, which are all available at workers. guelph.ca/tmp: The updated TMP will look at • Transportation Technology and transportation planning in Guelph New Mobility Options beyond 2031. The main objectives of • The Changing Transportation this update are: System User • To ensure that the new plan builds • Transportation and Building 21st upon current policies, including the Century Cities Official Plan and other master plans that have been approved since • Road Safety 2005; • Network Planning • To recommend
    [Show full text]
  • PA22.12 Improving Toronto's Bike Share Program: Increasing Access
    Submitted by Tamara Nahal, Community Engagement Manager, Cycle Toronto. Toronto Parking Authority (TPA) 10th floor, West Tower City Hall, 100 Queen St W Toronto, ON M5H 2N2 to: [email protected] April 1, 2021 RE: PA22.12 Improving Toronto’s Bike Share Program: Increasing Access and Equity of Bike ShareToronto Bike Share Toronto is an incredible public service that has grown in popularity with every year. New stations have expanded the reach of the system and we are thrilled to have Bike Share stations in more parts of the city than ever! Yet, not everyone in Toronto can access Bike Share due to reasons such as cost, location, and trip length. Therefore, we are writing to members of the Toronto Parking Authority Board to request the following three changes to improve equitable access to Bike Share Toronto: 1. Introduce a low-income pass 2. Expand Bike Share across the city, especially within the inner suburbs 3. Increase the ride duration from 30 minutes to allow for longer trips 1. Introduce a Low-Income Pass In May 2020, City Council passed the ActiveTO acceleration of the Cycling Network Plan including a motion calling for “Bikes for All”, which showed City Council’s interest in pursuing cycling as a transportation mode for low-income residents.1 In September 2020, City Council directed Bike Share to report back on the three items in this letter: a low-income pass, expansion of Bike Share, and the potential for an increase in the trip length.2 We urge the City of Toronto to develop a program to introduce a low-income, easy-to-access pass for Bike Share bikes in Toronto.
    [Show full text]