NACTO19, Registrant List, As of 08.28.19.Xlsx

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NACTO19, Registrant List, As of 08.28.19.Xlsx Designing Cities 2019 Attendee List as of 08.28.19 First Name Last Name Job Title Organization Majed Abdulsamad Program Associate NACTO-GDCI Sandra Abelaye Planner Honolulu Department of Transportation Services Rabi Abonour Research Associate NRDC Tobiah Abramson Project Lead Toronto Transportation Services Zak Accuardi Technical advisor, transportation NRDC Christine Acosta Board Member Tampa Bay Mobility Alliance Greg Adelberg Urban Designer HDR Ruchika Aggarwal Project Engineer City of Palo Alto Rit Aggarwala Head of Urban Systems Sidewalk Labs Gloria Aguessy Transportation & Traffic Analyst FNX-INNOV Eduardo Aguilar Valdez City Council City of San Pedro Michael Ahillen Project Manager Fitzgerald & Halliday Kelly Akasaki Traffic Engineer Honolulu Department of Transportation Services Dayo Akinyemi Deputy Director City of Detroit Laurie Alemian-Derian Director of Finance & Administration NACTO Jeffrey Alexis Principal Civil Engineer City of Boston Joseph Al-hajeri Engineering Associate City of Austin Amanda Alves Traffic Engineering Fortaleza City Hall Michael Amabile Senior Planner Arup Paloma Amayo-Ryan Transportation Supervisor Austin Transportation Department Katy Aminian Project Manager Toronto Parks, Forestry & Recreation Shamez Amlani Pedestrian Sundays in Kensington Market Gizachew Andargeh Transportation Planner District DOT M'Milo Aongya Planning and research coordinator BIXI-Montreal Rob Armstrong Trails & Transportation Program Manager Philadelphia Office of Transportation, Infrastructure and Sustainability Eric Asboe Transportation Administrative Manager Chattanooga DOT Rachael Ashton Senior Planner Victoria DOT Alex Atchison Senior Engineer Parametrix Emiko Atherton Director National Complete Streets Coalition Janet Attarian Deputy Director City of Detroit Viola Augustin GLX Project Liaison City of Somerville Eduarda Aun Program Associate NACTO-GDCI Angela Ayers Michigan Mobility Strategy Ford Smart Mobility Joni Baboci City of Tirana, Albania Liz Babson Director, Department of Transportation Charlotte DOT William Bacon Policy and Financial Analyst Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission John Bailey Climate Advisor NRDC Linda Bailey Vision Zero Director District DOT Justin Bak Toronto Transportation Services Chris Balerna Senior Project Manager Kleinfelder Yvonne Bambrick Pedestrian Sundays in Kensington Market Steven Bannasch Engineering Services Coordinator City of Detroit Jonathan Barfoot Business Development - Solutions Architect Verizon Emily Barkdoll City Strategist NRDC Joseph Barr Director of Traffic, Parking, and Transportation City of Cambridge Saikat Basak Project Manager Toronto Transportation Services Becky Bavinger Public Health Department Bloomberg Philanthropies Daniel Beard Transportation Planner WSP Cary Bearn Chief Bicycle Officer Atlanta City Planning Department Matthew Beaulieu Transportation Operations Engineering & Design Manager Seattle DOT Cameron Beck Associate Engineer SFMTA Craig Beck Director of Public Works Long Beach Public Works Will Becker Transportation Planner Salt Lake City Transportation Division Antoine Belaieff Sponsor, Fare Integration Metrolinx Olga Beltsar Civil Engineer III City of Norfolk Andy Bemis Bicycle & Pedestrian Program Coordinator Tucson DOT Lubka Benak Director of Livable Streets Chicago DOT Dana Benjamin Traffic Engineer City of Cambridge Keith Benjamin Director, Department of Traffic and Transportation Charleston Department of Traffic and Transportation Amy Bennett Assistant Planner City of Wauwatosa Mikey Bennington Analyst, Research and Policy Region of Peel Zabe Bent Director of Design NACTO Sasha Berger Program Manager NACTO Will Bernstein Climate Advisor, Pittsburgh NRDC Pierre Berté Business development in Innovation Colas Canada Jennifer Besenski Business Development Director, Canada Cubic Transportation Systems Ghulam Bham Senior Traffic Engineer City of Boston Sindhu Bharadwaj Policy Associate NACTO John Biesak Business Dev Associate SADA Systems Ashley Biggins Sr. Civil Engineer City of Boston Ashley Biggins Sr. Civil Engineer City of Boston Saul Billingsley Executive Director FIA Foundation Ben Bird Mobility Strategist Ford Motor Company Peter Bird Active Transportation Planner City of Nashville Edward Birnbaum Office of the Mayor, Director of Important Things City of Toronto Matthew Blackett Publisher Spacing Magazine Oni Blair Executive Director LINK Houston Stéphane Blais Ville de Montreal Joe Blankenship Senior Transportation Planner City of Boston Erin Blay Supervisor, Service Design & Projects Halifax Regional Municipality Juan Pablo Bocarejo Secretary Bogota Secretary of Mobility Stephanie Bohdanow Lead, Land Use Sector Development, Green Municipal Fund Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) Eric Bollich Division Manager, Transportation Engineering Austin Transportation Department Beaver Boonsook Assistant Transportation Engineer Oakland DOT Amica Bose Supervising Engineer Austin Transportation Department Brendan Boyle Economic Development & Culture City of Toronto David Bragdon Executive Director TransitCenter Evan Brazeau Planning & Operations Manager Toronto Transportation Services Scott Bricker Executive Director Bike Pittsburgh Russell Brooks Founder Scale Consulting Tanya Brooks Assistant Director Dallas DOT Barrington Brown Public Works Manager, Sr. Atlanta DPW Brytanee Brown Transportation Planner Oakland DOT Catherine Brown VP, Marketing & Corporate Social Responsibility Aviva Canada Charles Brown Senior Researcher Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers University Chisara Brown Deputy Director City of Detroit Heather Brown Manager - Customer Communications Toronto Transit Commission Lily Brown Transportation Planner Oakland DOT Shannon Brown Shared Mobility Project Coordinator Austin Transportation Department Wesley Brown Planning and Capital Projects Central Atlanta Progress Christopher Browne Chief Communications Officer NYC DOT Roger Browne Acting Director, Traffic Management Section City of Toronto Jeannette Brugger Bicycle & Pedestrian Coordinator Philadelphia Office of Transportation and Infrastructure Systems Jessica Brunson Senior Transportation Planner San Antonio Transportation & Capital Improvements Steve Buckley National Director - Planning & Environment WSP Amy Buitenhuis Senior Strategic Policy Consultant, Resilience Office City of Toronto Eric Burkman Director of Transit Priority MBTA Gayle Bursey Director, Healthy Public Policy City of Toronto Tamika Butler Director of Equity & Inclusion and Director of California Planning Toole Design Yadira Cabrera Event Coordinator NACTO Jodi Callan Project Manager Toronto Transportation Services Lina Camacho Interim City Transportation Engineer City of West Palm Beach Megan Campbell Principal Planner City of Houston Catherine Campbell Toronto Transportation Services Mark Candland Engineering Technician City of Pleasanton Naz Capano Manager, Transportation Policy & Innovation Toronto Transportation Services Kevin Carder City Planner City of Omaha Planning Department Geoff Carleton Sr. Principal Traffic Engineers, Inc. Michael Carroll Deputy Managing Director Philadelphia Office of Transportation, Infrastructure and Sustainability Shelley Carroll Councillor Ward 17 - Don Valley North Kris Carter Co-Chair, Mayor's Office of New Urban Mechanics City of Boston Jena Carver Transportation Engineer Salt Lake City Transportation Division Najah Casimir Communications Manager City of Cambridge Ellie Casson Head of Local Policy Waymo Sebastian Castellanos Research Manager NUMO Romina Castillo Community Planner MUSE Community + Design Gorka Castrillo International Market Development ZICLA Rebecca Caughey Technical Analyst Region of Peel Elise Cécyre Engineer Ville de Montreal Ankita Chachra Senior Program Manager NACTO-GDCI Jonathan Chai Project Manager / Senior Transportation Engineer HDR Sreyoshi Chakraborty Senior Planner Des Moines Area MPO Marlene Chamandy Manager, Government Relations Ford of Canada Anna Chamberlin Neighborhood Planning Manager District DOT Tosh Chambers Policy Analyst Pittsburgh Department of Mobility and Infrastructure Boris Chan CEO Roundtrip.ai Iris Chan Planning Analyst Metrolinx Jenn Chan Planner SFMTA Tien-Tien ("Tim Tim") Chan TDM Program Manager Austin Transportation Department Fiona Chapman Municipal Licensing and Standards City of Toronto Nancy Chater Toronto Parks, Forestry & Recreation Brad Chebott Director of Operations and Construction, Ontario Astral - Bell Media Elizabeth Chen Assistant Engineer SFMTA Yifan Chen Manager, Robotics & Mobility Research Ford Ran Chen Toronto City Planning Chester Cheng Project Manager Town of Tewksbury Phillip Cherry Engineer | Planner WSP Victoria Chong Transportation Planner/Outreach Coordinator SFMTA Tiffany Chu Co-Founder Remix Eric Chu Toronto Transit Commission Craig Chung Traffic Engineer Honolulu Department of Transportation Services Catherine Ciarlo Active Transportation + Safety Division Manager Portland Bureau of Transportation Amar Cid Senior Transportation Planner Caltrans Vince Cifani Founder Joyride Charlie Clark Mayor City of Saskatoon Chris Clark Chief Planner Honolulu Department of Transportation Services Eulois Cleckley Executive Director Denver DPW Regina Clewlow CEO & Co-Founder Populus Linda Cogswell Associate Transportation Planner City of Santa Monica Jon Coleman Mobility Policy & Strategy Ford Motor Company Jesse Coleman Toronto Transportation Services Robert Collard Product Owner Ford Motor Company Reuben Collins Engineer City of Saint Paul Cal Coplai Senior Data Scientist
Recommended publications
  • Shared Mobility Systems Gilbert Laporte, Frédéric Meunier, Roberto Wolfler Calvo
    Shared mobility systems Gilbert Laporte, Frédéric Meunier, Roberto Wolfler Calvo To cite this version: Gilbert Laporte, Frédéric Meunier, Roberto Wolfler Calvo. Shared mobility systems. 4OR: A Quar- terly Journal of Operations Research, Springer Verlag, 2015, 13 (4), pp.341-360. 10.1007/s10288-015- 0301-z. hal-01792763 HAL Id: hal-01792763 https://hal-enpc.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01792763 Submitted on 15 May 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. SHARED MOBILITY SYSTEMS GILBERT LAPORTE, FRED´ ERIC´ MEUNIER, AND ROBERTO WOLFLER CALVO Abstract. Shared mobility systems for bicycles and cars have grown in popularity in recent years and have attracted the attention of the operational research community. Researchers have investigated several problems arising at the strategic, tactical and operational levels. This survey paper classifies the relevant literature under five main headings: station location, fleet dimensioning, station inventory, rebalancing incentives, and vehicle repositioning. It closes with some open research questions. Key words: survey, shared mobility systems, bicycle and car sharing, fleet dimensioning, inventory rebalancing, vehicle repositioning. 1. Introduction The world of transportation has witnessed a mini-revolution in June 2007 with the launch- ing of the V´elib'bicycle sharing system in Paris.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a 21St Century Cycling City: Strategies for Action in Toronto
    Green Prosperity Papers Building a 21st Century Cycling City: Strategies for Action in Toronto — by Trudy Ledsham and Dr. Beth Savan January 2017 Metcalf Foundation Acknowledgements Methodology The mission of The George Cedric Metcalf This paper, from the Metcalf Green To develop, inform and refine the issues Charitable Foundation is to enhance the Prosperity Series, was made possible and recommendations in this report, a effectiveness of people and organizations through the financial support of the Metcalf series of consultations with local, national, working together to help Canadians imagine Foundation as well as by the generous and international bicycling experts were and build a just, healthy, and creative sharing of time and knowledge by our carried out during the summer of 2015. society. reviewers and advisors. Experts in the field including academic transportation researchers, academic and Local Advisors/Reviewers: Nancy Smith municipal planners, public health experts Beth Savan Lea, Dan Egan, Dave McLaughlin, Adam and active transportation advocates were Popper, Jacqueline Hayward Gulati, Carol invited to participate. We undertook a Beth Savan, Ph.D., an award-winning Mee, Jared Kolb, and Kristin Schwartz. three-stage process: initially local experts teacher, scholar and broadcaster, is were gathered for a discussion based on a appointed to the faculty of the School of National/international Advisors/ series of questions (Appendix A) to Environment at the University of Toronto, Reviewers: Ralph Buehler, Kevin stimulate thoughts and provide direction where she served as the inaugural Manaugh, Marco Te Brommelstroet, Ray for the report. This wide ranging discussion Sustainability Director at the St. George Tomalty, Meghan Winters, and Andrew led to detailed research and the draft of a campus.
    [Show full text]
  • PSC Agenda Packet
    Sacramento Area Council of Governments Regional Bike Share Policy Steering Committee Friday, August 28, 2020, 2:00 to 4:00p.m. Meeting Information: https://zoom.us/j/91955231855 You can also dial in using your phone: Dial‐in #: 888‐475‐4499 Webinar ID: 919 5523 1855 Upon entry into the meeting please type your name for attendance. Timed items are estimates only and may be taken up by the committee at any time. The Policy Steering Committee may take up any agenda item at any time, regardless of the order listed. Public comment will be taken on the item at the time that it is taken up by the committee. We ask that members of the public complete a request to speak form, submit it to the clerk of the committee, and keep their remarks brief. If several persons wish to address the committee on a single item, the chair may impose a time limit on individual remarks at the beginning of the discussion. Action may be taken on any item on this agenda. (2:00) Roll Call: Ayala, Cabaldon, Frerichs, Hansen, Harris, Trost (2:05) Public Communications: Any person wishing to address the committee on any item not on the agenda may do so at this time. After ten minutes of testimony, any additional testimony will be heard following the action items. (2:10) Action 1. Approve Assignment of JUMP Program Agreement to Lime (Ms. Bradbury) (2:40) Information and Discussion 2. An Overview of Bike Share System Operating Structures (Ms. Bradbury) (3:30) Other Matters (3:45) Next Meeting and Adjournment This agenda and attachments are available on SACOG’s website at www.sacog.org.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Ontario Bike Summit Agenda (Updated: April 15, 2016) "What's Next for Cycling" - #OBS16
    2016 Ontario Bike Summit Agenda (updated: April 15, 2016) "What's Next for Cycling" - #OBS16 Summit Venue: Eaton Chelsea Hotel 33 Gerrard Street West, Toronto, ON Tuesday, April 19, 2016 Pre-Summit Sessions 9 to 4.30pm (Hotel Lobby) Registration Open 10 to 1pm Toronto Bike Ride and Tour (Sold Old) (Meet at Hotel Bay Street Entrance) o Mobile workshop and discussion led by Jacquelyn Hayward Gulati, Cycling Infrastructure & Programs Manager and City of Toronto staff. Explore some of downtown Toronto's newest cycling infrastructure including separated bike lanes on Wellesley Street and Sherbourne Street, contraflow lanes on Simcoe Street and the Waterfront Trail's multi-use paths. Bikes will be provided by Bike Share Toronto. 2 to 5pm (Gerrard Room) Bicycle Friendly Communities Seminar (max. 60 participants) o The Bicycle Friendly Community Award (BFC) Program provides incentives, hands-on assistance, and award recognition for communities that actively support bicycling. Join this ever-popular in-depth session for participants looking to learn more about the BFC program, from submitting your first application to moving up the ranks. This year’s seminar theme is “Lighter, Quicker, Cheaper” and we will be exploring high-impact, low cost projects that have been implemented across Canada to create more bicycle-friendly communities. 5 to 6pm (Gerrard Room) Committee ‘Speed Dating’: Get to Know Professionals at Work, Hosted by APBP o Ever want to know who’s doing what in Ontario for cycling? This session, hosted by the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (Ontario Chapter) is a chance to find out about various committees working to advance cycling in Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Regional Bike Sharing: Human-Scaled Mobility and Transit Integration in Urban Growth Centres
    Planning for Regional Bike Sharing: Human-scaled Mobility and Transit Integration in Urban Growth Centres by Scott Hays supervised by Laura Taylor A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Environmental Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Studies York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2 August 2018 Abstract This paper argues that an integrated approach to bike sharing program implementation can yield considerably higher benefits than bike sharing operations in isolation, and can improve transit systems and urban design alike. This paper draws from literature on the Sustainable Transportation paradigm, New Urbanism and Smart Growth to argue that a transit-integrated regional approach to bike sharing can greatly contribute to a seamless regional transit system, while yielding significant benefits to local urban design and mobility as well. Such an approach can significantly enhance transit’s competitiveness against the automobile, enabling transit-oriented designs of Urban Growth Centres that mitigate autocentric suburban sprawl. Employing this approach to GO Transit’s upcoming Regional Express Rail (RER) and the Urban Growth Centres of the GGH can facilitate the complete communities desired in the Provincial Growth Plan to advance the GGH’s polycentric urban network. The incorporation of bike sharing systems (BSSs) into regional transportation planning approaches provides the link that connects the regional with the local just as it connects the user from their door to the transit station. To realize its full potential in multimodal chains, bike sharing requires a high level of integration with the anchoring transit system in order to make it convenient and competitive against the personal automobile.
    [Show full text]
  • Bike Share Toronto Request for Proposal
    PA13.1 Appendix D APPENDIX D: BIKE SHARE TORONTO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Bike Share Toronto Request for Proposal Release Date: July 29, 2015 Response Due Date: August 26, 2015 Version: 1.0 Copyright Copyright © Toronto Parking Authority. This document is unpublished and the foregoing notice is affixed to protect Toronto Parking Authority in the event of inadvertent publication. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, including photocopying or transmission electronically to any computer, without prior written consent of Toronto Parking Authority. This document and the information contained in it are the property of Toronto Parking Authority and may not be used or disclosed except as expressly authorised in writing by Toronto Parking Authority. Trademarks Bike Share Toronto is a trademark of the Toronto Parking Authority. iOS is a trademark of Apple Corporation. Android is a trademark of Google Inc. Other product names mentioned in this document may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies and are hereby acknowledged. Table of Contents Schedule A – Glossary ..................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Company Overview ................................................................................... 5 1.1.1 Toronto Parking Authority .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Private Data Islands Or Public Data Oasis?
    Private data islands or public data oasis? Why cities need mandatory mobility APIs. 1 SPRING 2019 Executive summary Public, real-time Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) are critical pieces of data infrastructure that facilitate multimodal, multi-operator trips, promote a fair and competitive mobility marketplace, and enable the public to help determine whether a public mobility program’s goals are being met. While NGOs have drafted initial principles that promote public APIs for services that operate on public streets, there is still a lack of specific guidance about how to require these important open real-time feeds. With this policy paper, we point to specific examples as best practices for public, real-time API policies. We also look to the future, envisioning what mobility APIs can achieve beyond simply conveying real-time availability information, with a focus on the evolution of payment APIs. Our enlightened self-interest It’s true: our app exists because of public APIs from transit agencies and mobility operators. While Transit benefits from open APIs, so do other companies — and the general public. Open transport data has led to an entire generation of consumer apps that turn real-time data into useful tools for riders. Requiring public APIs from services that operate on public streets extends a mobility tradition that’s open and fair, while promoting innovation and competition. 1 What are public, real-time APIs? A public, real-time Application Programming Interface (API) allows a mobility operator to provide universal access to real-time information about their service, using a standard data format. Translation: a transit, ridehail, bikeshare, scooter or carshare operator can use a public, real-time API to provide information about where it has vehicles available for use, or when its service is going to arrive, opening up information so potential riders can find and use the service.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton Shared Micro-Mobility
    Appendix "A" to Report PED20109(c) Page 1 of 53 Final Report Hamilton Shared Micro-Mobility Assessment of Operating Models, Funding Sources, and Role of Not-For-Profit Organizations Prepared for City of Hamilton by IBI Group November 5, 2020 IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT Appendix "A" to Report PED20109(c) HAMILTON SHARED MICRO-MOBILITY Page 2 of 53 Prepared for City of Hamilton Executive Summary Since 2015, Hamilton’s bike share program has been an integral part of the way residents and visitors move around the city. It is the only public bike share in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) outside Toronto and has been recognized by the Transportation Association of Canada and Canada Clean 50 as a model for sustainable urban transportation. As of early 2020 prior to the pandemic, some 5% of Hamiltonians, nearly 27,000 people, are active members and they make over 30,000 trips a month. As the micro-mobility market has evolved with the entry of venture-funded companies, dockless technologies, and electric vehicles, the program now operates in a very different environment from when it launched. Adding to the urgency for change, Uber’s decision to cease operating the system as of June 2020, the lack of penalties for breaking that contract, and the lack of dedicated sources for operating funds together put the system in a precarious state. This study is intended to identify the most suitable operating model to provide sustainable shared micro-mobility in Hamilton and leverage the wide range of new technologies in the market, as well as identify suitable non-tax-based funding sources, and potential expansion areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Program Book (PDF)
    “Access to safe, reliable transportation is a question of social justice. Our work gives us the opportunity to uplift the needs of people who were historically marginalized by unacceptable past planning practices. Establishing equity as a cornerstone means accelerating our efforts in neighborhoods where access to a job, to I am honoured to welcome you to Toronto for the National Association of City school, healthcare, childcare, and every life need matters most.” Transportation Officials’ 2019 Designing Cities conference. Toronto is Canada’s largest city and North America’s fourth largest with 2.9 million residents. Our city is a global centre for business, technology and innovation, finance, arts and Robin Hutcheson culture and we continue to strive to be a model of sustainable development. I Director of Public Works, Minneapolis encourage you to enjoy Toronto, learn about our diverse neighbourhoods and NACTO Vice President explore our vibrant streets. The conference represents a tremendous opportunity for the City of Toronto to share our unique insights and accomplishments as Canada’s largest city. Through concerted efforts, the City of Toronto has become a city of global renown by providing a transportation system that is safe and reliable and supports our strong and diverse economy. Since 2016, Toronto has committed to making its streets safer by prioritizing the safety of our most vulnerable road users with the implementation of the Vision Zero Road Safety Plan. Our latest phase of Vision Zero, adopted unanimously by City Council in July 2019, continues this commitment by taking targeted, proactive actions, such as a speed management strategy to reduce the speed limits on most City streets, and the introduction of automated speed enforcement to target dangerous driving near schools.
    [Show full text]
  • For New Residents and Fellows at the University of Toronto
    MAY 2020 Orientationfor New Residents and Fellows at the University of Toronto Social Media ............................................................ 2 5. During Training ........................................................ 31 In-Training Evaluation Reports (ITERS) ................................ 31 ......................................................... 4 PGME Contact Research Ethics Module for Clinical Fellows ........................ 32 Introduction . ............................................................. 5 Fellowship Education Advisory Committee (FEAC) ................ 33 Completion of Training Certificate ....................................... 34 1. Registration ............................................................... 6 Process Overview ............................................................... 6 6. Banking ....................................................................... 35 Letter of Appointment ........................................................ 6 College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario ..................... 7 CPSO Requirement for Source Verification 7. Accommodation ....................................................... 36 of Medical Degree ........................................................ 8 Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA) ................. 9 8. Transportation ........................................................... 38 Getting a Social Insurance Number (SIN) ............................ 9 Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Technology and New Mobility Options: City of Guelph
    Transportation Technology and New Mobility Options City of Guelph Transportation Master Plan Background Paper Series Guelph Transportation Master Plan Moving Guelph Forward Guelph is growing and how we move This paper is part of a series of around our city is changing. As a result, background papers intended to we are exploring transportation options communicate information, key trends, to make our city move better in every and concepts. These will form the way. Through the Transportation Master foundation of and set the strategic Plan (TMP) update, we will review all direction for our updated TMP. The of the ways we move: walking, cycling, papers are intended to support riding transit, driving, trucking, and conversations in the community and using trains. Our goal is to ensure that within City Hall about how we plan for we offer diverse travel options, have the future of mobility. appropriate transportation capacity, and maintain a high quality of life for The series includes the following both existing and future residents and papers, which are all available at workers. guelph.ca/tmp: The updated TMP will look at • Transportation Technology and transportation planning in Guelph New Mobility Options beyond 2031. The main objectives of • The Changing Transportation this update are: System User • To ensure that the new plan builds • Transportation and Building 21st upon current policies, including the Century Cities Official Plan and other master plans that have been approved since • Road Safety 2005; • Network Planning • To recommend
    [Show full text]
  • PA22.12 Improving Toronto's Bike Share Program: Increasing Access
    Submitted by Tamara Nahal, Community Engagement Manager, Cycle Toronto. Toronto Parking Authority (TPA) 10th floor, West Tower City Hall, 100 Queen St W Toronto, ON M5H 2N2 to: [email protected] April 1, 2021 RE: PA22.12 Improving Toronto’s Bike Share Program: Increasing Access and Equity of Bike ShareToronto Bike Share Toronto is an incredible public service that has grown in popularity with every year. New stations have expanded the reach of the system and we are thrilled to have Bike Share stations in more parts of the city than ever! Yet, not everyone in Toronto can access Bike Share due to reasons such as cost, location, and trip length. Therefore, we are writing to members of the Toronto Parking Authority Board to request the following three changes to improve equitable access to Bike Share Toronto: 1. Introduce a low-income pass 2. Expand Bike Share across the city, especially within the inner suburbs 3. Increase the ride duration from 30 minutes to allow for longer trips 1. Introduce a Low-Income Pass In May 2020, City Council passed the ActiveTO acceleration of the Cycling Network Plan including a motion calling for “Bikes for All”, which showed City Council’s interest in pursuing cycling as a transportation mode for low-income residents.1 In September 2020, City Council directed Bike Share to report back on the three items in this letter: a low-income pass, expansion of Bike Share, and the potential for an increase in the trip length.2 We urge the City of Toronto to develop a program to introduce a low-income, easy-to-access pass for Bike Share bikes in Toronto.
    [Show full text]