Marxism Versus Postmodernism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Marxism Versus Postmodernism Theoretical quarterly of the International Marxist Tendency In defence of 34 £3 � €3 In this issue: When the Communists ruled in Bavaria “Left narratives” or class struggle? MARXISM VERSUS POSTMODERNISM Editors: Alan Woods Theoretical (editor in chief) quarterly of the Rob Sewell International Hamid Alizadeh Marxist Francesco Merli Tendency Daniel Morley Contact: @ editor marxist.com In defence of Marxism 50525 14 6 PO Box , London, UK, E WG +44 0 207 739 2544 Contents ( ) p6 p3 Marxism versus Postmodernism Editorial: A word to In the first of a series of articles, we look at post- our readers modern philosophy, a species of subjective ideal- We are proud to relaunch the new look In ism, which today exerts a baleful influence that ex- Defence of Marxism as the theoretical organ tends beyond the walls of universities. of the International Marxist Tendency. p22 p15 When the Communists “Left narratives” or ruled in Bavaria class struggle? 100 years ago, a Soviet Republic was declared in Ba- Many on the left argue that what we need is varia amidst a revolutionary wave that swept Ger- a “new narrative” to counter the dominant many. Contained in its brief, heroic existence are narrative of the ruling class. But can this numerous lessons for revolutionaries today. idea take the workers’ movement forward? Front page image: andrés dEAN, flickr In defence of A WORD TO OUR READERS “A journal that sets out to be a militant mate- presentation. However, the new maga- As Lenin pointed out in his classic of rialist organ must be primarily a militant or- zine will now appear in several languages Marxism, What is to be done?: gan, in the sense of unflinchingly exposing and apart from English (Spanish, Portuguese, “Without revolutionary theory there can be no indicting all modern “graduated flunkeys of German and Swedish translations are al- revolutionary movement. This idea cannot be clericalism”, irrespective of whether they act as ready planned, and other languages will insisted upon too strongly at a time when the representatives of official science or as freelanc- follow) It will be published in dozens of fashionable preaching of opportunism goes ers calling themselves ‘democratic Left or ideo- countries around the world, either in pa- hand in hand with an infatuation for the nar- logically socialist’ publicists.”1 (Lenin, On the per or digital format. rowest forms of practical activity.”2 Significance of Militant Materialism) We trust that our existing readers will Revolutionary class struggle cannot be re- continue to give us the same enthusiastic duced to the immediate bread and butter elcome to the latest edition support as ever and look forward to wel- struggle of the working class. Among the of In Defence of Marxism, coming a large number of new readers, innumerable squabbling sects who falsely which represents a new convinced that the ideas of Marxism will claim the title of Marxists, we frequently and exciting point of de- continue to be a never-ending source of find a thinly veiled contempt for theory Wparture for our magazine. inspiration to revolutionary workers and and a slavish worship for what they con- In the nine years since it first com- youth everywhere. sider to be “practical issues.” menced publication, in the Spring of The newspapers of the sects are full 2012, the In Defence of Marxism maga- THE IMPORTANCE OF THEORY of cheap agitation, written in a “popular” zine (IDoM) has established a firm rep- The first number of the revamped IDoM style, as though the workers were little utation for serious Marxist analysis and is a special issue devoted mainly to the children incapable of grasping “difficult commentaries on both theoretical ques- subject of Marxism versus postmodern- ideas.” This merely shows a snobbish con- tions and burning issues of the labour ism. Some people may be surprised at tempt for working-class men and women, movement. this decision. Why waste time discussing a typical feature of the petty bourgeois Although it was initially launched as a abstract and obscure ideas that have no mentality and characteristic of people British journal, it has always had a strong relevance to the working class? that have no real knowledge of the work- international orientation and audience. But this criticism misses the point en- ing class. It closely followed the political line of tirely. Marxism does not confine itself to In fact, the workers soon tire of being marxist.com, the well-known website agitation on issues of immediate interest told things they already know very well. which has gained a well-deserved reputa- to the mass of the working class. Marxism They are well aware that they’re exploited tion for its consistent and uncompromis- is much more than a political programme by the bosses, living in bad houses, paid ing defence of the ideology and principles and an economic theory. It is a philoso- too low wages, that they pay too much for of revolutionary Marxism. phy, the vast scope of which covers not water and electricity, and so on and so We have felt for some time that the In- only politics and the class struggle, but forth. But the thinking workers – those ternational Marxist Tendency needed a the whole of human history, economics, who have already understood the need for theoretical journal, and the obvious can- society, thought and nature. It is too often a fundamental change in society – will not didate for this role was IDoM, which had forgotten that Marx and Engels started be nourished by such stale crumbs. the advantage of being “ready-made” and as philosophers and that a revolution- The most advanced and militant work- well established. ary philosophy, dialectical materialism, ers seek a more satisfactory diet. They The political line of the journal will not stands at the very heart of their thinking. wish to acquire a serious understanding change, apart from the new layout and of the world in which they live. Far from 3 return to contents being put off by theory, these workers have a thirst for knowledge and ideas. It is the task of genuine Marxists to help them In its youth the bourgeoisie was acquire those ideas. Without theory, we would have no rea- capable of producing great son to exist as a separate political tenden- thinkers: Locke, Hobbes, Kant, cy. It is what distinguishes us, on the one hand, from the reformists of both the left Hegel, Adam Smith, and Ricardo. and right variety, and on the other hand from the sectarian blockheads. The role In the period of its decline, it is only of our magazine is not to tell the workers what they already know, but to provide capable of producing what Marx them with the necessary theoretical ar- aptly described as flea-crackers. moury to prepare them for the great tasks that impend. The struggle for theory is a fundamen- In the period of its historical ascent, of a precipice is not capable of rational tal prerequisite for preparing the workers the bourgeoisie played a most progressive thought. In a vague way, the ideologues of for the struggle for power. Whoever does role, not only in developing the produc- the bourgeoisie sense that the system they not understand this has no understand- tive forces, and thereby mightily expand- defend is reaching its end. The spread of ing of what Marxism is. Alongside the ing humanity’s power over nature, but irrational tendencies, mysticism, and re- economic and political struggles, as En- also in pushing back the frontiers of sci- ligious fanaticism reflects the same thing. gels explained, the working class must ence, knowledge, and culture. The postmodernist craze that pass- also wage war against the dominant ideas Luther, Michelangelo, Leonardo, es for philosophy in our time is itself a in bourgeois society. Engels’s Anti-Dühring Dührer, Bacon, Kepler, Galileo, and a confession of the most abject intellectual and Lenin’s book on Empirio-Criticism, host of other pathfinders of civilisation bankruptcy. The mere fact that this post- were classic examples of that struggle. shine like a galaxy, illuminating the broad modernist “narrative” could be taken se- It is our duty to go on the offensive highway of human cultural and scientific riously as a new philosophy is in itself a against the reactionary bourgeois ideas advance opened by the Reformation and crushing condemnation of the theoretical that are being continuously churned out Renaissance. bankruptcy of capitalism and the bour- by the universities. We must mercilessly In its youth the bourgeoisie was capa- geois intelligentsia in the epoch of impe- expose the bourgeois professors for what ble of producing great thinkers: Locke, rialist decay. they really are: ‘graduated flunkeys of Hobbes, Kant, Hegel, Adam Smith, and Postmodernism denies the concept clericalism’, to use the phrase by which Ricardo. In the period of its decline, it of historical progress in general, for Joseph Dietzgen describes the university is only capable of producing what Marx the simple reason that the society that professors – the idealist apologists of the aptly described as flea-crackers. spawned it is incapable of any progress. capitalist system. Marx once observed: “Philosophy and the This is no accident. Millions of people are Dialectical materialism remains one of study of the actual world have the same relation faced with an uncertain future. The gen- the most important weapons in our rev- to one another as onanism and sexual love.”3 eral ruin does not affect only the working olutionary arsenal. And since dialectical Modern bourgeois philosophy prefers the class, but extends to the middle class, the materialism is the basis and foundation former to the latter. In its obsession with students and professors, the researchers of Marxism, it is quite logical that of all combatting Marxism (and materialism in and technicians, the musicians and art- the theories of Marx, no other has been so general), it has dragged philosophy back ists, lecturers and doctors.
Recommended publications
  • Douglas Peifer on Munich 1919: Diary of a Revolution
    Victor Klemperer. Munich 1919: Diary of a Revolution. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017. 220 pp. $25.00, cloth, ISBN 978-1-5095-1058-0. Reviewed by Douglas Peifer Published on H-War (December, 2017) Commissioned by Margaret Sankey (Air University) Victor Klemperer’s diary created quite a stir came an increasingly desperate struggle. Translat‐ when frst published in Germany in 1995. Klem‐ ed into English in 1998/99, his frst-person reflec‐ perer’s diary entries for the period 1933-45 have tions of life in the Third Reich have been used ex‐ been used extensively by scholars of the Third Re‐ tensively by scholars such as Richad J. Evans, Saul ich and the Holocaust to illustrate how Nazi ideol‐ Friedländer, and Omer Bartov.[1] ogy and racial policies affected even thoroughly Klemperer’s Munich 1919: Diary of a Revolu‐ assimilated, converted Jews. Klemperer, the son tion provides a remarkable eyewitness account of of a rabbi, was born in Wilhelmine Germany. His an earlier crisis in German history, one connected education, professional development, and life to the Third Reich by the myths and memories choices were thoroughly bourgeois, with Klem‐ that ideologues on the far right exploited through‐ perer’s conversion to Protestantism signaling his out the Weimar era. Two days before the abdica‐ self-identification with German culture and his tion of Kaiser Wilhelm II and the declaration of a desire to assimilate. Klemperer attended Gymna‐ German Republic in Berlin on November 9, 1918, sium in Berlin and Landsberg on the Warthe, worker and soldier councils in Munich toppled studied German and Romance philology in Mu‐ the 738-year Wittelsbach dynasty in Bavaria.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Bradford Ethesis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bradford Scholars University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. THE WHITE INTERNATIONAL: ANATOMY OF A TRANSNATIONAL RADICAL REVISIONIST PLOT IN CENTRAL EUROPE AFTER WORLD WAR I Nicholas Alforde Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Social and International Studies University of Bradford 2013 Principal Supervisor: Gábor Bátonyi, DPhil Abstract Nicholas Alforde The White International: Anatomy of a Transnational Radical Revisionist Plot in Central Europe after World War I Keywords: Bauer, Gömbös, Horthy, Ludendorff, Orgesch, paramilitary, Prónay, revision, Versailles, von Kahr The denial of defeat, the harsh Versailles Treaty and unsuccessful attempts by paramilitary units to recover losses in the Baltic produced in post-war Germany an anti- Bolshevik, anti-Entente, radical right-wing cabal of officers with General Ludendorff and Colonel Bauer at its core. Mistakenly citing a lack of breadth as one of the reason for the failure of their amateurishly executed Hohenzollern restoration and Kapp Putsch schemes, Bauer and co-conspirator Ignatius Trebitsch-Lincoln devised the highly ambitious White International plot. It sought to form a transnational league of Bavaria, Austria and Hungary to force the annulment of the Paris Treaties by the coordinated use of paramilitary units from the war vanquished nations. It set as its goals the destruction of Bolshevism in all its guises throughout Europe, the restoration of the monarchy in Russia, the systematic elimination of all Entente-sponsored Successor States and the declaration of war on the Entente.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet”: from Bolshevik Utopia to Soviet Modernity
    Introduction Countercultures Ideologies and Practices Alternative Visions A HISTORY OF THE “SOVIET”: FROM BOLSHEVIK UTOPIA TO SOVIET MODERNITY Anna Krylova Introduction: Crossing out “Proletarian,” Writing “Soviet”1 In early 1936,Aleksandr Kosarev, the thirty-three-year-old leader of the All-Union Young Communist League (Komsomol), and his Central Committee worked away on a draft of the organiza- tion’s new membership rules. The draft was forwarded directly to Joseph Stalin, who must have spent hours hand-editing the lengthy document. The resulting document was cleansed of what most scholars today would associate with the signature Bolshevik lingua franca of the socialist project undertaken in the Soviet Union. Stalin consistently crossed out the familiar Bolshevik terms, categories, and metaphors that Kosarev had copied from the old rules. Stalin wrote “nonaffi liated” in place of “proletarian” and “laboring” in place of “class conscious.”2 Two months later, at the Komsomol Congress that gathered to adopt the new mem- bership rules, Stalin began to use the term “Soviet” to refer to these “party-less” and “laboring” young people. The toast with which he ended the Congress, “Long live the Soviet youth,” sounded like a definitive corrective to Kosarev and other weath- ered Komsomol leaders, who still preferred to refer to their 1 I am grateful to Social organization as the “young generation of the proletarian revolu- History for allowing me to draw on materials 3 tionaries.” published in Anna Krylova, “Imagining Socialism in the Soviet Century,” Social The odd but explicit opposition between the Bolshevik political History 42, no. 3 (2017): lingua franca and Stalin’s discursive intervention carried out under 315–41, in this essay, DOI: 10.1080/03071022 the rubric of the “Soviet” cannot help but give a scholar of modern .2017.1327640, reprinted Russia pause.
    [Show full text]
  • Diss Gradschool Submission
    OUTPOST OF FREEDOM: A GERMAN-AMERICAN NETWORK’S CAMPAIGN TO BRING COLD WAR DEMOCRACY TO WEST BERLIN, 1933-72 Scott H. Krause A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: Konrad H. Jarausch Christopher R. Browning Klaus W. Larres Susan Dabney Pennybacker Donald M. Reid Benjamin Waterhouse © 2015 Scott H. Krause ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Scott H. Krause: Outpost of Freedom: A German-American Network’s Campaign to bring Cold War Democracy to West Berlin, 1933-66 (under the direction of Konrad H. Jarausch) This study explores Berlin’s sudden transformation from the capital of Nazi Germany to bastion of democracy in the Cold War. This project has unearthed how this remarkable development resulted from a transatlantic campaign by liberal American occupation officials, and returned émigrés, or remigrés, of the Marxist Social Democratic Party (SPD). This informal network derived from members of “Neu Beginnen” in American exile. Concentrated in wartime Manhattan, their identity as German socialists remained remarkably durable despite the Nazi persecution they faced and their often-Jewish background. Through their experiences in New Deal America, these self-professed “revolutionary socialists” came to emphasize “anti- totalitarianism,” making them suspicious of Stalinism. Serving in the OSS, leftists such as Hans Hirschfeld forged friendships with American left-wing liberals. These experiences connected a wider network of remigrés and occupiers by forming an epistemic community in postwar Berlin. They recast Berlin’s ruins as “Outpost of Freedom” in the Cold War.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2015-09-11 Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 Bucholtz, Matthew N Bucholtz, M. N. (2015). Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27638 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/2451 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 By Matthew N. Bucholtz A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2015 © Matthew Bucholtz 2015 Abstract November 1918 did not bring peace to Germany. Although the First World War was over, Germany began a new and violent chapter as an outbreak of civil war threatened to tear the country apart. The birth of the Weimar Republic, Germany’s first democratic government, did not begin smoothly as republican institutions failed to re-establish centralized political and military authority in the wake of the collapse of the imperial regime. Coupled with painful aftershocks from defeat in the Great War, the immediate postwar era had only one consistent force shaping and guiding political and cultural life: violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Lenin Included in Volumes 26-31 of This Edition
    W O R K E R S O F A L L C O U N T R I E S , U N I T E! L E N I N COLLECTED WORKS 44 A THE RUSSIAN EDITION WAS PRINTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A DECISION OF THE NINTH CONGRESS OF THE R.C.P.(B.) AND THE SECOND CONGRESS OF SOVIETS OF THE U.S.S.R. ИНCTИTУT МАРÇCИзМА — ЛЕНИНИзМА пpи ЦK KНCC B. n. l d H n H С О Ч И Н E Н И Я И з д a н u е ч е m в е p m o e ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ ИЗДАТЕЛЬСТВО ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ M О С К В А V. I. L E N I N cOLLEcTED WORKS VOLUME 44 October 1o17–November 1o 20 PROGRESS PUBLISHERS MOSCOW TRANSLATED FROM THE RUSSIAN BY CLEMENS DUTT EDITED BY BERNARD ISAACS From Marx to Mao M L © Digital Reprints 2014 www.marx2mao.com First printing 1970 Second printing 1975 Third printing 1977 10102—213 л беэ объявл. 014 (01)—77 7 C O N T E N T S Page Preface ........................ 35 1917 1. INSTRUCTION TO THE RED GUARD STAFF. October 30 (November 1?) ................... 43 2. TO THE PETROGRAD COMMITTEE OF THE R.S.D.L.P.(B.). November ? (15) .................. 43 3. TO Y. M. SVERDLOV. Not earlier than November 8 (?1) . 44 4. TO THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION OF THE LABOUR PRESS OF AMERICA, FRANCE AND GREAT BRITAIN. November, prior to 10 (?3) ...... 44 5. TO MAJOR-GENERAL S. I. ODINTSOV. November 15 (?8).
    [Show full text]
  • Road to Revolution III, Table of Contents
    Road To Revolution III, Table of Contents Road to Revolution III from PL Magazine, Special Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (November, 1971). Table of Contents Editorials (Not included in this Internet edition) ROAD TO REVOLUTION III is the third major attack on revisionism by the Progressive Labor Party. This summary article attempts to draw many lessons -- positive and negative -- from the practice of the international communist movement. Particularly under attack is the current right wing leadership of the Mao Tse-tung group in China. Another impoertant section deals with some of the errors of our party. It is our hope that we can learn from them and move the cause of the working class to socialism. THE GREAT PROLETARIAN CULTURAL REVOLUTION (GPCR) is analyzed to see why and how it was reversed. In this important piece an effort is made to understand the class forces at play. A serious try is made to sort out -- based on evidence -- the right from the left. In addition, the left and its efforts are dealt with in an attempt to prevent repetition of its mistakes by our party and all revolutionaries. This LETTER BY THE IRANIAN STUDENT ORGANIZATION indicates their revulsion at the invitation of the enemies of the Iranian people in China. The CCP is playing footsie with fascists all over the world and this letter indicates the growing disgust with Mao Tse-tung's policies. The STRATEGY AND TEACTICS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST MOVEMENT since its inception are dealt with in this article. This herculean effort will certainly stir up thinking and controversy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Lessons from the First Hungarian Workers' State (1919
    The Historical Lessons from the First Hungarian Workers’ State (1919) The Hungarian Soviet Republic (HSR), the first Hungarian workers’ state was established on 21 March 1919. It existed for 133 days. In August 1919 Romanian and French troops occupied Hungary. The workers’ state was destroyed and replaced by a Bourgeois government. The HSR’s place in history The Hungarian Soviet Republic was the first workers’ state in Europe established after the October Revolution of 1917. It could exist longer than the Bavarian Soviet Republic (6 April- 3 May 1919) or the Slovakian Soviet Republic (16 June-7 July 1919) so it was a more comprehensive experience of European socialism. Background Hungary became independent in 1867 in the frameworks of the Austrian-Hungarian Monarchy. Hungary participated in World War I on the side of Germany and lost the war. In November 1918 the Monarchy was dissolved. In November 1918 the Bourgeois revolution triumphed in Budapest. Hungary was declared a peoples’ republic.It was ruled by Bourgeoisand social-democrat politicians. The Hungarian ruling class faced three challenges. One: to normalize the economic situation after the war devastations. Two: to defend independence and territorial integrity against the winners of the war, like France, andthe newly born national countries, like Romania and Czechoslovakia. Three: to prevent the strengthening of communist forces and to avoid socialist revolution. The ruling class was not able to solve these problems. Lesson from the HSR Lenin’s idea about world revolution is a real possibility. The HSR demonstrated that socialism is not an exclusively Russian solution but a general program of triumphing over capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • New Year Greetings from the Workers Party of Ireland to International Communist and Workers’ Parties
    New Year Greetings from the Workers Party of Ireland to International Communist and Workers’ Parties Dear Comrades, The Workers Party of Ireland sends comradely greetings and best wishes for 2019 to communist and workers’ parties throughout the world. Capitalism continues to condemn millions to poverty, unemployment, homelessness, inequality, oppression, exploitation, hunger and disease. Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism, with its specific features, including the concentration of production into monopolies and inter-imperialist rivalries in fierce competition with each other for resources, markets and trade routes, threatens the peace and security of the peoples of the world and leads to intervention and war. The working class has the ability to change this. Class remains the motive force for social change. Class struggle is the means through which the working class advances from a class “in itself” to a class “for itself,” as a necessary precondition for its own emancipation. The conditions for class struggle are ripe. The case for socialism remains timely and relevant. This year many important events will be remembered. The October Revolution brought about a social system which abolished private ownership of the means of production and affirmed social ownership as the basis for creating the conditions for a new way of life. In the aftermath of the October Revolution, on 21 March 1919, the Hungarian Soviet Republic was proclaimed. On 7 April, 1919 the Bavarian Soviet Republic was declared. In September 1919 the Communist Party of America convened in Chicago. In Ireland the “Democratic Programme” approved by the First Dáil Éireann (lower house of the Irish parliament) on 21 January 1919 was a progressive recognition of the rights of labour although much of the explicitly socialist content in the earlier draft was removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Urg 2018 Annual Report L Rosa Uxemb Stiftung
    2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROSA LUXEMBURG STIFTUNG ROSA-LUXEMBURG-STIFTUNG 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 2018 ANNUAL REPORT ROSA-LUXEMBURG-STIFTUNG 1 CONTENTS EDITORIAL 4 FOCUS: MARX2006 OntheShouldersofKarlMarx 6 MultimediaMarx—TheWebPortal 8 TheCongressMarx200: Politics—Theory—Socialism9 Marx200aroundGermany 10 K is for Karl—ASeriesofFilmsbyPaulMason 10 MarxforEveryone!—EducationalMaterialsforBeginners 11 AClassicinitsJubileeYear—CapitalReadingCoursesandthe11thAutumnSchool 12 ProjectsSupportedbytheRLSin2018asPartofMarx200 12 PublicationsRelatedtoMarx200 13 INSTITUTE FOR CRITICAL SOCIAL ANALYSIS 14 ConnectiveClassPolitics 15 Fellows 16 NewAuthoritarianismandtheRadicalRight 17 “WeAccuse!”—TheHealthcareSystemonTrial 18 LuxemburgLectures2018 20 THE ACADEMY FOR POLITICAL EDUCATION 22 TheCaseisNotClosed!—SentencingattheMunichNSUTrial 23 ShapingtheFuturethroughLeftistProfessionalDevelopment 23 LocalPolitics:ACrashCourse 24 IntheRight(s):InternationalMovementsforGlobalJustice 24 ASocietyofManyDifferentStrenghts 25 THE HISTORICAL CENTRE FOR DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM 26 100YearsofRevolutioninGermany 27 1968:AGlobalAwakening 28 1938:TheYearBeforetheWar 29 THE RLS NETWORK ACROSS GERMANY 30 Baden-Württemberg:PoliticalAcademyforYoungActivists 32 Bavaria:TheBavarianRevolutionandtheBavarianSovietRepublicof1918/19 32 Berlin:TheRed-Red-GreenCoalitionanditsHousingPolicy:TakingStock 33 Brandenburg:StructuralTransformationinLusatia 33 Bremen:City/Data/Explosion 34 Hamburg:StrategiesforCombatingAnti-Feminism 34 Hesse:AuthoritarianismandResistanceinTurkey 35 Mecklenburg-Vorpommern:TheRoleoftheJudiciaryintheMunichNSUTrial
    [Show full text]
  • Commemorating Kurt Eisner and the Bavarian Revolutions of 1918-1919 in Postwar Munich
    Fairfield University DigitalCommons@Fairfield History Faculty Publications History Department 1997 Monuments and the Politics of Memory: Commemorating Kurt Eisner and the Bavarian Revolutions of 1918-1919 in Postwar Munich Gavriel D. Rosenfeld [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/history-facultypubs Copyright 1997 Cambridge University Press Peer Reviewed Repository Citation Rosenfeld, Gavriel D., "Monuments and the Politics of Memory: Commemorating Kurt Eisner and the Bavarian Revolutions of 1918-1919 in Postwar Munich" (1997). History Faculty Publications. 56. https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/history-facultypubs/56 Published Citation Rosenfeld, G. (1997) "Monuments and the Politics of Memory: Commemorating Kurt Eisner and the Bavarian Revolutions of 1918-1919 in Postwar Munich," Central European History, Volume 30, Nr. 2, 1997, pp. 221-251. This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Monuments and the Politics of Memory: Commemorating Kurt Eisner and the Bavarian Revolutions of 1918-1919 in Postwar Munich Gavriel D. Rosenfeld the turbulent nature of recent German history, studies of postwar German memory understandably have focused upon the GIVEN issue of Vergangenheitsbewaltigung?the difficult process of "coming to terms" with the historical experience of the Third Reich and the Sec? ond World War.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-19840-1 — Revolutionary World Edited by David Motadel Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-19840-1 — Revolutionary World Edited by David Motadel Index More Information Index ‘Al-Aynayn, Shaykh Ma, 113 Anfal Operation, 199 ‘Ali-Quli Khan Sardar As‘ad, 119 Anglo-Dutch War (1780–84), 55 26th of July Movement, 266 Anglo-Persian Treaty (1919), 139, 142 Abbas, Mahmoud, 258–259 Anglo-Russian Trade Agreement Abdülhamid II (Ottoman), 24 (1921), 140 Adamec, Ladislav, 236 Angola, 177 Afghanistan, 33, 140, 160, 194–195, 197, Anticommunist Revolutions, 1, 3, 14, 198, 205, 214 33–34, 66, 113, 215–241 Ahmad, Jalal Al-i, 209, 210 April 6 Youth Movement (Egypt), 243 Ahrar al-Sham, 259 Arab Spring, 3, 15, 34–35, 72, 242–261 Al-Afghani, Jamal al-Din, 208 Arabian Peninsula, 18, 24, 107, 163 Al-Assad, Bashar, 254 Arendt, Hannah, 8, 13, 36, 40 Al-Assad, Hafez, 198, 200, 245 Argentina, 82, 107, 113, 146 Alawites, 254 Armenia, 140 Albania, 33 Armenians, 125, 152, 154 Alexander II (Romanov), 101 Army of the Vosges, 22, 95 Algeria, 23, 30, 35, 177, 204, 245, 246–247 Atatürk, Mustafa Kemal, 201 Black October, 245 Atlantic Revolutions, 2, 5–6, 8, 12–13, Algerian War of Independence, 209, 213 15–20, 31, 38–65, 89, 109, 263–264 Algiers, 23, 99–100 Australia, 82–84, 102 Al-Haddad, Sheikh, 99 Austria, 18, 34, 56, 67, 71, 77–78, 85, 105, Allen, William, 85 113, 137, 160, 229 Alliance of Free Democrats (SzDSz), Austrian Empire, 71, 77–78, 85 225, 227 Austrian Netherlands, 17, 55–56 Al-Maliki, Nuri, 258 Austrian Revolution, 160 Al-Mokrani, Muhammad bin al-Haj Avignon, 54 Ahmad, 99 Al-Qa‘ida, 195, 259 Baden, 21–22, 67, 78 Al-Sadat,
    [Show full text]