Chondrichthyes: Chimaeriformes: Chimaeridae), a New Species of Chimaera from New Zealand
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Bull Mar Sci. 91(1):63–81. 2015 new taxa paper http://dx.doi.org/10.5343/bms.2014.1042 Chimaera carophila (Chondrichthyes: Chimaeriformes: Chimaeridae), a new species of chimaera from New Zealand 1 * 1 Hollings Marine Lab, Medical Jenny M Kemper University of South Carolina, 331 David A Ebert 2, 3 Fort Johnson Rd., Charleston, 1 South Carolina 29412. Gavin JP Naylor Dominique A Didier 4 2 Pacific Shark Research Center, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, 8272 Moss Landing Road, Moss Landing, California 95039. ABSTRACT.—A new species of chimaeroid, Chimaera carophila sp. nov., is described from 37 specimens collected 3 South African Institute for from deepwater slopes and seamounts around New Aquatic Biodiversity, Private Bag Zealand. The new species is distinguished from its closest 1015, Grahamstown, 6140, South Africa. congeners, Chimaera fulva Didier et al. 2008, Chimaera macrospina Didier et al. 2008, and Chimaera obscura Didier 4 Department of Biology, et al. 2008, by its uniform pale-brown coloration, geographic Millersville University, PO Box distribution, and a combination of morphological characters, 1002, Millersville, Pennsylvania 17551. including longer dorsal and ventral caudal fin bases, a shorter first dorsal fin height, a shorter dorsal fin spine, and shorter * Corresponding author email: claspers that are divided distally for one-third of their length. <[email protected]>. Chimaera carophila sp. nov. also can be distinguished from closely related species in New Zealand and Australian waters based on DNA sequence divergence of the NADH2 gene. Comparisons of body size in a large sample of specimens show considerable overlap in character ranges among congeners making species distinctions difficult. New combinations of morphometrics are suggested including ratios of head length to eye length and dorsal spine length to head length, to better distinguish among species of chimaeroids that are similar in Date Submitted: 19 May, 2014. overall appearance and size. Also, a key to New Zealand and Date Accepted: 10 November, 2014. Australian Chimaera species is provided. Available Online: 5 December, 2014. The chimaeroids (order Chimaeriformes) are a relatively small group of mainly deep-sea fishes comprised of three distinct families, Callorhinchidae (plow-nose chimaeras), Rhinochimaeridae (long-nose chimaeras), and Chimaeridae (short-nose chimaeras). There are currently 48 recognized species (Didier et al. 2012, Angulo et al. 2014). The most species-rich family, the Chimaeridae (37 species), contains two genera, Chimaera with 15 species and Hydrolagus with 22 species (Didier et al. 2012, Angulo et al. 2014). New technological developments in deep-water exploration including remotely- operated vehicles and manned submersibles along with the emergence of deep-water fisheries and concentrated efforts to survey local fauna have contributed to a recent resurgence in chimaeroid taxonomy (James et al. 2009, Didier et al. 2012). Since 2002, 18 new species have been described, all in the family Chimaeridae, with more species likely awaiting formal description. Of these 18 new species, nine occur in the Bulletin of Marine Science 63 © 2015 Rosenstiel School of Marine & Atmospheric Science of the University of Miami 64 Bulletin of Marine Science. Vol 91, No 1. 2015 southern Pacific Ocean around New Zealand and Australia (Last and Stevens 2009, Didier et al. 2012). In New Zealand waters, all three chimaeroid families occur, comprising 10 valid species: the family Callorhinchidae, with Callorhinchus milii Bory de St. Vincent, 1823; the family Chimaeridae, represented by the species Chimaera lignaria Didier, 2002, Chimaera panthera Didier, 1998, Hydrolagus bemisi Didier, 2002, Hydrolagus homonycteris Didier, 2008, Hydrolagus novaezealandiae (Fowler, 1910), Hydrolagus trolli Didier and Séret, 2002; the family Rhinochimaeridae, including the species Harriotta haeckeli Karrer, 1972, Harriotta raleighana Goode and Bean, 1895, and Rhinochimaera pacifica (Mitsukuri, 1895). Here, we formally describe a new species of Chimaera, previously referred to as Chimaera sp. C (Paulin et al. 1989), from New Zealand, using both morphological and molecular data. With the inclusion of this new species, it brings the number of Chimaera species in New Zealand waters to three and to 16 worldwide. Methods Specimens were collected by bottom trawl from deep-water fishing grounds around New Zealand as part of the Te Papa Biosystematics of New Zealand’s Exclusive Economic Zone (NZ EEZ) Fishes subcontract within the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research’s (NIWA) marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity outcome- based investment (OBI) program. Body measurements were taken point to point on preserved specimens following Compagno et al. (1990) and Didier (2002), and lateral line canal measurements of the head following Didier and Séret (2002). In total, 38 body measurements were tak- en: total length (TL); precaudal length (PCL); body length (BDL); snout-vent length (SVL); trunk length (TRL); pre-second dorsal length (PD2); pre-first dorsal length (PD1); pre-orbital length (POB); pre-oral length (POR); pre-narial length (PRN); sec- ond dorsal fin base (D2B); maximum height of anterior second dorsal fin (D2AH); maximum height of posterior second dorsal fin (D2PH); first dorsal fin base (D1B); dorsal spine length (DSA); maximum height of first dorsal fin (D1H); dorsal caudal margin (CDM); maximum height of dorsal caudal fin (CDH); total caudal fin length including filament (CTL); ventral caudal margin (CVM); maximum height of ventral caudal fin (CVH); head length (HDL); anterior margin of pectoral fin (P1A); ante- rior margin of pelvic fin (P2A); inter-dorsal space (IDS); dorsal-caudal space (DCS); posterior base of pectoral fin to anterior base of pelvic fin (PPS); posterior base of pelvic fin to anterior edge of ventral caudal fin (PCA); anterior edge of first dorsal fin base to anterior edge of pectoral fin base (D1P1); anterior edge of first dorsal fin base to anterior edge of pelvic fin base (D1P2); anterior edge of second dorsal fin base to anterior edge of pectoral fin base (D2P1); anterior edge of second dorsal fin base to anterior edge of pelvic fin base (D2P2); eye length (EYL); eye height (EYH); total length of claspers from pelvic fin base to tip (CLT); length of medial branch of clasper from fork to tip (CLM); length of lateral branch of clasper from fork to tip (CLL); length from anterior tip of frontal tenaculum knob to rear end of base (FTL). In total, eight lateral line canal measurements of the head were taken: distance from ante- rior oronasal fold to center of nasal canal (ONC); length of the rostral canal (LRC); length of the nasal canal measured as the straight line distance from right to left side (LNC); distance between infraorbital and angular canal measured as the straight line Kemper et al.: New species of Chimaera from New Zealand 65 Table 1. Primer sequences used in PCR amplification of NADH2 gene. Primer name Primer sequence ILEM 5΄ –AAGGAGCAGTTTGATAGAGT –3΄ ASNM 5΄ –AACGCTTAGCTGTTAATTAA –3΄ Chimaera F 5΄ –AAGGACTACTTTGATAGAGT –3΄ Chimaera R 5΄ –TAAAGTGTCTGGGTTGCATTCAG –3΄ Chimaera F1 5΄ –CATACCCCAAACACGTTGGTTAA –3΄ Chimaera R1 5΄ –AAGATCRATGCTTACTCACCTAG –3΄ distance from junction of the oral and infraorbital canal to the junction of the oral and angular canal (IOA); distance between preopercular canal and main trunk canal measured from their junction with the infraorbital canal (OTM); distance between the main trunk canal and supratemporal canal measured from their junctions with the infraorbital and postorbital canals (OCL); length of supratemporal canal mea- sured across the head from its junctions with the postorbital canal (STL); distance from anterior base of spine to the center of the supratemporal canal (SPS). Preserved specimens were examined from the following institutions: National Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (NMNZ), Commonwealth Science and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), and the Australian Museum, Sydney (AMS), where institutional abbreviations follow Eschmeyer and Fricke (2014). Muscle tissue was taken from representative specimens in the field and stored in 95% ethanol at 4 °C until further processing in the laboratory. Total DNA was ex- tracted using the EZNA® Tissue DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek) and stored at −20 °C. Samples were PCR amplified using primers designed to target the complete coding sequence for NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (NADH2; Naylor et al. 2005) along with TaKaRa Ex Taq. Primers were either designed to bind to the ASN and ILE tRNA regions of the mitochondrial genome of elasmobranchs or modified to be specific to NADH2 region of chimaeroid fishes (Table 1). PCR was carried out in a 25 μl volume comprising 1× TaKaRa buffer, 2 to 3.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM of dNTPs, 0.32 μM for- ward and reverse primers, 0.625 units of Taq, 2 μl of undiluted DNA template derived directly from the EZNA kit, and PCR grade water. The initial reaction mix was de- natured at 94 °C for 2 min, then subjected to 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 50–58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, followed by 72 °C for 5 min, and a hold at 4 °C. A sample of the PCR product was run on a 1% agarose gel and visualized under UV light to assess the efficacy of the PCR amplification. Those samples that were successfully amplified were sent out for DNA sequencing (Retrogen, San Diego, CA). The software pro- gram Geneious (v.6.1.7) was used to read sequences, assess quality, make nucleotide base calls, and align nucleotide and translated sequences. Aligned sequences were subjected to phylogenetic analysis using PAUP* v.4.0a131 (Swofford 2002) for the general-time reversible (GTR) + invariable sites (I) + gamma model under maximum likelihood. Parameter values for the nucleotide substitution model, the proportion of invariable sites and the alpha value for the gamma distribution used in the GTR likelihood analysis were estimated from the data using an initial tree based on parsi- mony analysis of the sequence data. Specimens used in molecular inference are referred to by a lab code (prefixed by GN) referring to the personal collection of G Naylor, College of Charleston, South Carolina.