Final Research Report Rqf N°527-16-000007
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FINAL RESEARCH REPORT RQF N°527-16-000007 Effective Representation?: Case Studies of Indigenous Organizations and Infrastructure Development in the Amazon Basin Mídia Ninja Mídia Foto: FINAL RESEARCH REPORT RQF N°527-16-000007 Effective Representation?: Case Studies of Indigenous Organizations and Infrastructure Development in the Amazon Basin FINAL RESEARCH REPORT Effective Representation? : Case Studies of Indigenous Organizations and Infrastructure Development in the Amazon Basin By Derecho, Ambiente y Recursos Naturales-DAR This study was made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under contract RQF No. 527-16-000007 and executed by Derecho, Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Acronyms AAGG French Guiana Association of Amerindians AAI Integrated Environmental Assessment ACIMVIP Association of Indigenous Cabildos of the Municipality of Villa Garzón ACIPAP Association of Indigenous Cabildos of the Awá People AIDA Association for the Defense of the Environment AIDESEP Interethnic Association of the Peruvian Jungle AMWAE Association of Waorani Women of the Amazon Ecuadorian APA Association of Amerindian Peoples BDNES National Bank of Social and Economic Development CAIOP Putumayo Indian Council of Indigenous Authorities CCPAB Consultative Council of the Amerindian and Bushinenguese Populations CIDOB Confederation of Indigenous Peoples of Bolivia CIMI Indigenous Missionary Council CMIB Central Indigenous Women of Beni CNAMIB National Confederation of Indigenous Women of Bolivia COAIB Coordination of the Indigenous Organizations of the Brazilian Amazon CODENPE Development Council of the Nationalities and Peoples of Ecuador COICA Indigenous Organizations Coordinator of the Amazon Basin CONAMAQ Council of Marcas and Ayllus of the Qollasuyo CONFEINAE Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of the Ecuadorian Amazon CONISUR National Indigenous Council of the South CORPI - SL Regional Coordinator of the Indigenous Peoples of San Lorenzo EIA Environmental Impact Assessment FCUNAE Federation of Communes and Union of Natives of the Ecuadorian Amazon FECONA Federation of Native Communities of Ampiyacu FECONARINA Federation of Native Communities of Nanay River FECONAU Federation of Native Communities of the Ucayali and Tributaries FEPIPA Federation of Indigenous Peoples of Pará Organization FIEB Indigenous Federation of Bolivar State FIP Forest Investment Fund FOAG Federation of Indigenous Organizations of French Guiana FUNAI National Indian Foundation IACHR Inter American Court of Human Rights IBAMA Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources IICD International Institute for Communication for Development IIRSA Initiative for the Integration of Regional Infrastructure in South America KIPARA Embera People’s Association KLIM Kaliña and Lokono in Marowijne LCDS Low Carbon Development Strategies MINPPI Ministry of Popular Power for Indigenous Peoples MMM Maria Women’s Movement MMTACC Campo Cidade Women’s Movement MPF Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office OIS Organization of Indigenous Peoples of Suriname OMIDA Organization of Indigenous Women of Autana ONAG Organization of Indigenous Peoples of Guiana ONHAE Organization of the Huaorani Nationality of the Ecuadorian Amazon OPIAC National Organization of the Indigenous Peoples of the Colombian Amazon OPIP Organization of Indigenous Peoples of Pastaza OPKS Organization of the Kichwa People of Sarayaku ORAU Regional Organization AIDESEP Ucayali ORPIA Regional Organization of Indigenous Peoples of Amazon ORPIO Regional Organization of the East Indigenous Peoples OZIP Indigenous Zonal Organization of the Putumayo PIACI Protection of Peoples in Isolation and Initial Contact RTKNN Kugapakori, Nahua, Nanti Territorial Reserve SDDH Society for the Defense of Human Rights TIPNIS Indigenous Territory and Isiboro Sécure National Park UCIW Union of Warao Indigenous Communities UN United Nations Executive Summary his document aims to identify and understand the particular conditions that determine the degree of effectiveness of representation of national indigenous organizations of the nine countries of the Amazon basin that comprise the Indigenous Organizations Coordinator of the Amazon Basin T(COICA). These are: AIDESEP (Peru), COIAB (Venezuela), OPIAC (Colombia), CIDOB (Bolivia), CONFENIAE (Ecuador), FOAG (French Guiana), OIS (Suriname) and APA (Guyana). In addition, the constituting organizations of these groups were taken into account in thirteen case studies of high impact development projects (oil, gas, and mining, among others). Taking into account the purpose of the study and the USAID concept of representation, which includes factors such as the capacity to influence and negotiate, project monitoring, transparency and degree of communication with the community, we considered the variable of representation in terms of the aforementioned factors, as well as some additional factors that are necessary to apply it in two distinct moments in time: during the selected case studies and at present. The analysis resulted in a general picture that identified several essential factors that best explain the effective representation of national indigenous organizations, such as the degree of transparency in coordination with the community and the capacity to attract and manage resources. These two factors, despite the dynamics and particularities that exist in each case, play an important role in understanding the dynamics of representation. It bears emphasizing, however, that each of the thirteen cases revealed particular characteristics and conditions that influenced the behavior of national indigenous organizations and their base communities, namely the changing political context of each country and the role of other actors such as civil society. These factors further complicate the scenarios of representation in the Latin American region, especially in the Amazon basin. The report is divided into four main sections. The first provides background and includes the most emblematic cases of outstanding effective representation in the framework of high-impact development projects. The section that follows details the methodology employed both for data collection and defining the proposed indicators and variables. The third section presents the case studies, the case of COICA and that of governments, businesses and banks. Finally, bibliographical references as well as appendices appear in the last section, including details of the interviews that were conducted and the databases constructed as part of the research. Apib Comunicação Foto: Table of contents Pg. INTRODUCTION 10 1. BACKGROUND 12 2. METHODOLOGY 16 3. MAIN FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: 24 3.1 Case Studies - National Indigenous Organizations 25 3.1.1 TIPNIS - Bolivia 25 3.1.2 Orinoco Mining Arc - Venezuela 31 3.1.3 APE “La Cabaña” case in Villa Garzón 36 and El Orito - Colombia 3.1.4 Belomonte and Tapajós - Brazil 42 3.1.5 Sarayaku and Yasuní - Ecuador 48 3.1.6 Amazon waterway and Camisea – Peru 54 3.1.7 Kaliña and Lokono in Marowijne - Suriname 60 3.1.8 Aurora Mining Project - Guyana 64 3.1.9 Amazonian Park - French Guiana 69 3.2 Analysis of COICA 75 3.3 Regional Scenario of Indigenous Organizations 77 in the Amazon Basin 3.4 Governments, businesses and banks 81 4. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS 88 5. RECOMMENDATIONS 94 6. ANNEXES 104 7. BIBLIOGRAPHY 147 Iroz VIllagarzon Iroz Foto: Introduction ccording to CEPAL and World Bank data, indigenous people comprise more than 8% of the total population of Latin America (CEPAL 2014). In the case of South America, Bolivia and Peru have the largest indigenous A populations. This statistical data, based on official censuses, underscores the need to address the situation of indigenous peoples in South America, and to visualize the complex structures of their organizations, and their strategies of representation and participation. The complexity and organizational diversity of indigenous people in the region has been a subject of study for centuries. However, these studies have tended to view indigenous peoples as mystical, exotic, different actors: the so-called “other”. Only in the past three decades have indigenous movements acquired protagonist status and moved beyond being conceived as part of a distant history. It was in Mexico and Ecuador at the beginning of the 1990s that self-identifying indigenous people entered the political scene as organized and mobilized groups to demand recognition of their rights and, above all else, participation in the political process of their countries. Until that point, debates about the definition of “indigenous” were full of discriminatory, paternalistic and exotic ideas. This narrative reduced their capacity to mobilize. This emergence coincided with the region’s deployment of state-led development policies that placed extractive natural resource activities (usually mining and hydrocarbons) at the center of income generation. This vision of development considered the territory where indigenous people lived as an important arena for these investments. In addition to extractive activities, infrastructure projects were developed to support the strategy. These investments benefited from a scenario in which mineral and oil prices were growing at very favorable levels. In the medium term, this scenario did not result in substantial