Introduction: the Valles Caldera, in the Jemez Moun- Tains in North Central
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Passive Monitoring of Ambient Reactive Gaseous Mercury in The
Passive Monitoring of Ambient Reactive Gaseous Mercury ihFin the Four Corners Area, Eastern OklhOklahoma, an d Central/East Texas: Important Method Evaluation and Baseline Work Presented at the National Air Toxics Monitoring and Data Analysis Workshop, Dallas, Texas, April 7, 2011. • Mark Sather, U.S. EPA Region 6, Air Quality Analysis Section • (214) 665-8353, [email protected] 1 Introduction • This presentation will summarize the first year of a two year monitoring project estimating reactive gaseous mercury (RGM, a.k.a. gaseous oxidized mercury, GOM) dry deposition in the Four Corners area and eastern Oklahoma, and preview a similar study to be done in Texas. • RGM of interest because of its chemical reactivity/water solubility; RGM readily deposits to water , soils and vegetation by both dry and wet processes; atmospheric lifetime = 0.5-2 days versus 0.5-2 years for elemental mercury which is mildly reactive and sparingly soluble in water. • Four Corners/Eastern Oklahoma project is a two year effort funded by U.S. EPA ORD Regional Applied Research Effort (RARE) program; the upcoming Texas study will also be funded by RARE . • Project Collaborators: U.S. EPA Region 6, U.S. EPA ORD, Frontier Geosci/lbliiences/Global Sciences, Ali on, NMED, NPS, USFS/ BLM, Jemez Pueblo/Valles Caldera Trust, Cherokee Nation. • Ambient monitoring began in August, 2009, and will run through the first part of August, 2011. 2 Project Objectives • To gather first-time RGM dry deposition estimates for 24 consecutive months at six sites in the Four Corners area to set a valuable ambient RGM dry deposition estimate baseline with proper assessment of: (a) the effectiveness of the Frontier Atmospheric Dry Deposition (FADD) surrogate surface devices in providing reliable RGM dry deposition estimates and (b) the inter-annual RGM dry deposition estimate variability. -
Stratigraphic Nomenclature of ' Volcanic Rocks in the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico
-» Stratigraphic Nomenclature of ' Volcanic Rocks in the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico By R. A. BAILEY, R. L. SMITH, and C. S. ROSS CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY » GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1274-P New Stratigraphic names and revisions in nomenclature of upper Tertiary and , Quaternary volcanic rocks in the Jemez Mountains UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1969 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 15 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract.._..._________-...______.._-.._._____.. PI Introduction. -_-________.._.____-_------___-_______------_-_---_-_ 1 General relations._____-___________--_--___-__--_-___-----___---__. 2 Keres Group..__________________--------_-___-_------------_------ 2 Canovas Canyon Rhyolite..__-__-_---_________---___-____-_--__ 5 Paliza Canyon Formation.___-_________-__-_-__-__-_-_______--- 6 Bearhead Rhyolite-___________________________________________ 8 Cochiti Formation.._______________________________________________ 8 Polvadera Group..______________-__-_------________--_-______---__ 10 Lobato Basalt______________________________________________ 10 Tschicoma Formation_______-__-_-____---_-__-______-______-- 11 El Rechuelos Rhyolite--_____---------_--------------_-_------- 11 Puye Formation_________________------___________-_--______-.__- 12 Tewa Group__._...._.______........___._.___.____......___...__ 12 Bandelier Tuff.______________.______________... 13 Tsankawi Pumice Bed._____________________________________ 14 Valles Rhyolite______.__-___---_____________.________..__ 15 Deer Canyon Member.______-_____-__.____--_--___-__-____ 15 Redondo Creek Member.__________________________________ 15 Valle Grande Member____-__-_--___-___--_-____-___-._-.__ 16 Battleship Rock Member...______________________________ 17 El Cajete Member____..._____________________ 17 Banco Bonito Member.___-_--_---_-_----_---_----._____--- 18 References . -
Geothermal Hydrology of Valles Caldera and the Southwestern Jemez Mountains, New Mexico
GEOTHERMAL HYDROLOGY OF VALLES CALDERA AND THE SOUTHWESTERN JEMEZ MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4067 Prepared in cooperation with the OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER GEOTHERMAL HYDROLOGY OF VALLES CALDERA AND THE SOUTHWESTERN JEMEZ MOUNTAINS, NEW MEXICO By Frank W. Trainer, Robert J. Rogers, and Michael L. Sorey U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4067 Prepared in cooperation with the OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Albuquerque, New Mexico 2000 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services Water Resources Division Box 25286 5338 Montgomery NE, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80225-0286 Albuquerque, NM 87109-1311 Information regarding research and data-collection programs of the U.S. Geological Survey is available on the Internet via the World Wide Web. You may connect to the Home Page for the New Mexico District Office using the URL: http://nm.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Page Abstract............................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................ 2 Purpose and scope........................................................................................................................ -
A Vegetation Map of the Valles Caldera National Preserve, New
______________________________________________________________________________ A Vegetation Map of the Valles Caldera National Preserve, New Mexico ______________________________________________________________________________ A Vegetation Map of Valles Caldera National Preserve, New Mexico 1 Esteban Muldavin, Paul Neville, Charlie Jackson, and Teri Neville2 2006 ______________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY To support the management and sustainability of the ecosystems of the Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP), a map of current vegetation was developed. The map was based on aerial photography from 2000 and Landsat satellite imagery from 1999 and 2001, and was designed to serve natural resources management planning activities at an operational scale of 1:24,000. There are 20 map units distributed among forest, shrubland, grassland, and wetland ecosystems. Each map unit is defined in terms of a vegetation classification that was developed for the preserve based on 348 ground plots. An annotated legend is provided with details of vegetation composition, environment, and distribution of each unit in the preserve. Map sheets at 1:32,000 scale were produced, and a stand-alone geographic information system was constructed to house the digital version of the map. In addition, all supporting field data was compiled into a relational database for use by preserve managers. Cerro La Jarra in Valle Grande of the Valles Caldera National Preserve (Photo: E. Muldavin) 1 Final report submitted in April 4, 2006 in partial fulfillment of National Prak Service Award No. 1443-CA-1248- 01-001 and Valles Caldrea Trust Contract No. VCT-TO 0401. 2 Esteban Muldavin (Senior Ecologist), Charlie Jackson (Mapping Specialist), and Teri Neville (GIS Specialist) are with Natural Heritage New Mexico of the Museum of Southwestern Biology at the University of New Mexico (UNM); Paul Neville is with the Earth Data Analysis Center (EDAC) at UNM. -
Capulin Volcano National Monument, New Mexico
GeologicGeologic Resource Resourcess Inventory Inventory Scoping Scoping Summary Summary Capulin Glacier VolcanoBay National National Park, Monument Alaska New Mexico Geologic Resources Division Geologic Resources Division PreparedNational Park by Katie Service KellerLynn National Park Service August US Department 31, 2011 of the Interior U.S. Department of the Interior The Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) Program, administered by the Geologic Resources Division, provides each of 270 identified natural area National Park System units with a geologic scoping meeting, a scoping summary, a digital geologic map, and a geologic resources inventory report. Geologic scoping meetings generate an evaluation of the adequacy of existing geologic maps for resource management, provide an opportunity to discuss park-specific geologic management issues and, if possible, include a site visit with local experts. The purpose of these meetings is to identify geologic mapping coverage and needs, distinctive geologic features and processes, resource management issues, and potential monitoring and research needs. The National Park Service (NPS) Geologic Resources Division held a GRI scoping meeting for Capulin Volcano National Monument on May 10, 2011, at the headquarters/visitor center, which is located 48 km (30 mi) east of Raton, New Mexico. Participants at the meeting included NPS employees from the national monument, Geologic Resources Division, Bent’s Old Fort National Historic Site, Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site, and the Southern Plains Network; and cooperators from Colorado State University and the New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources (see table 1, p. 15). Superintendent Peter Armato welcomed the group and expressed his support of the Geologic Resources Inventory. Although Armato had only been at the national monument for a month, he was thrilled to be in a “geologic park.” Armato’s many academic degrees are in geologic disciplines. -
Seismic Investigation of the Yavapai-Mazatzal Transition Zone and the Jemez Lineament in Northeastern New Mexico
Seismic Investigation of the Yavapai-Mazatzal Transition Zone and the Jemez Lineament in Northeastern New Mexico Maria Beatrice Magnani and Alan Levander Department of Earth Science, Rice University, Houston, Texas Kate C. Miller and Tefera Eshete Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas Karl E. Karlstrom Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico A new seismic reflection profile of the Precambrian lithosphere under the Jemez Lineament (JL) (northeastern New Mexico, USA) shows impressive reflectivity throughout the crust. The upper crust is characterized by a 2 km thick undeformed Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimen- tary sequence above the Precambrian basement. At a depth of 5–8 km, undulating reflec- tions image a Proterozoic nappe cropping out in the nearby Rincon Range. To the south the upper crust is seismically transparent except for south dipping reflections at 2–10 km depth. The middle-lower crust, from 10–45 km depth, shows oppositely dipping reflections that converge in the deep crust (35–37 km) roughly at the center of the profile. To the north the reflectivity dips southward at 25° to a depth of 33 km before fading in the lower crust. In the southern part of the profile a crustal-scale duplex structure extends horizontally for more than 60 km. We interpret the oppositely dipping reflections as the elements of a doubly ver- gent suture zone that resulted from the accretion of the Mazatzal island arc to the southern margin of the Yavapai proto-craton at ~1.65–1.68 Ga. -
Facts and Hypotheses Regarding the Miocene–Holocene Jemez Lineament, New Mexico, Arizona and Colorado Fraser Goff and Shari A
New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: https://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/72 Facts and hypotheses regarding the Miocene–Holocene Jemez Lineament, New Mexico, Arizona and Colorado Fraser Goff and Shari A. Kelley, 2021, pp. 101-116 in: Geology of the Mount Taylor area, Frey, Bonnie A.; Kelley, Shari A.; Zeigler, Kate E.; McLemore, Virginia T.; Goff, Fraser; Ulmer-Scholle, Dana S., New Mexico Geological Society 72nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 310 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 2021 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, Color Plates, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States. -
Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
Jump to Navigation Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States As of January 12, 2017, the USGS maintains a limited number of metadata fields that characterize the Quaternary faults and folds of the United States. For the most up-to-date information, please refer to the interactive fault map. Jemez-San Ysidro fault, Jemez section (Class A) No. 2029a Last Review Date: 2016-06-26 Compiled in cooperation with the New Mexico Bureau of Geology & Mineral Resources citation for this record: Jochems, A.P., Kelson, K.I., and Personius, S.F., compilers, 2016, Fault number 2029a, Jemez-San Ysidro fault, Jemez section, in Quaternary fault and fold database of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey website, https://earthquakes.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults, accessed 12/14/2020 02:23 PM. Synopsis General: The Jemez-San Ysidro fault is a steeply east-dipping normal fault that, in part, forms the active western margin of the Rio Grande rift south of the Valles caldera. The fault is divided into sections on the basis of a 45° change in fault strike at the latitude of Cañones and evidence for young (Holocene) rupture along its southern section. The northern, northeast-striking section of the fault (Jemez section) is aligned with northeast-striking faults within the collapsed center of the Valles caldera and the Embudo fault, and is coincident with the Jemez Lineament. The Embudo fault, and is coincident with the Jemez Lineament. The central fault (San Ysidro section) merges with the southern fault (Calabacillas section) about 7 km south of the town of San Ysidro. -
B2158 Pt 15 Text Copy
Previous section Volume contents The Fate of the Colorado Plateau—A View from the Mantle By Felix E. Mutschler,1 Edwin E. Larson,2 and David L. Gaskill3 CONTENTS Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 204 Passive Hot Spots Bordering the Colorado Plateau ........................................................ 204 Great Falls Tectonic Zone (GFTZ) ......................................................................... 206 Colorado Mineral Belt (COMB) ............................................................................. 211 Northern Rio Grande Rift (NRGR)......................................................................... 215 Great Basin Regional Gravity Low (GBRGL)........................................................ 215 Southern Basin And Range Province (SBR)........................................................... 217 Scenario for the Evolution of Continental Passive Hot Spots......................................... 218 Summary and Conclusions.............................................................................................. 219 Acknowledgments........................................................................................................... 219 References Cited ............................................................................................................. 219 FIGURES 1–3. Maps of the Western United States showing: 1. Relation of Colorado Plateau to geophysical provinces.............................. -
Applying Hydrology to Land Management on the Valles Caldera
ince 2004, the Valles Caldera the Jemez River’s East Fork to 11,254 feet SNational Preserve (VCNP) in on Redondo Peak, the highest dome in the Applying the Jemez Mountains of northern caldera (see map, right). VCNP forms a New Mexico has hosted extensive field single watershed draining from a breach in hydrology research by scientists from the caldera wall to the Jemez River’s San Hydrology the Center for Sustainability of semi- Diego Canyon, southwest of the preserve. Arid Hydrology and Riparian Areas (SAHRA) at the University of Arizona. Legacies of Human Activities With the development of a detailed Humans have utilized the VCNP region to Land hydrologic understanding of VCNP’s for at least 10,000 years, harvesting plants climate, geology, soils, vegetation, and and wildlife for food and collecting high- hydrology, preserve managers have grade obsidian for tools and weapons. Management begun to incorporate research results As a private land holding, livestock into their management planning for grazing and logging operations dominated rangelands, forests, and watersheds, human land use in the 19th and 20th on the Valles including specific programs such as centuries, significantly impacting the livestock grazing and management of watersheds and riparian ecosystems. fisheries and wildlife populations. Extensive, long-term overgrazing by sheep (pre-World War II) and livestock Caldera The Preserve (post-1950s) led to substantial degradation The Valles Caldera Preservation Act of streambanks and water quality; even (PL 106-248), passed by Congress in today the major streams of the preserve National 2000, provided for the acquisition of the are listed as “impaired” by the New privately owned Baca Ranch. -
DIRECTIONS GUIDE from Los Alamos to Bandelier National Monument and the Valles Caldera National Preserve
Los Alamos, New Mexico DIRECTIONS GUIDE From Los Alamos to Bandelier National Monument and the Valles Caldera National Preserve. OPTION 1 1) Drive east on Trinity Drive (Hwy 502) until it merges with East Road, passing by the Los Alamos Airport. Continue down the hill - follow signs for White Rock and SR4. 2) Continue on SR4 until you reach the White Rock Visitor Center on the right side of the road after the Fire Station. 3a) From mid-May to mid-October: All visitors must park at the Visitor Center and ride the shuttle bus to Bandelier National Monument. 3b) From mid-October to mid-May: Continue past the Visitor Center until you reach the Entrance Road turnoff at Bandelier National Monument. Time from Los Alamos to Bandelier: 34 minutes To reach Valles Caldera National Preserve: 4) Continue on SR4 past Bandelier and the Hwy 501 inter- section (W. Jemez Road). The entrance road for the Valles Caldera will be on the right approx. 16 miles from Bandelier. Time from Los Alamos to Valles Caldera: 50 minutes OPTION 2 1) Drive west on Trinity Drive (Hwy 502) and then turn left onto Diamond Drive (Hwy 501). 2) Take the left-hand curve after passing over the Omega Bridge and then turn right at the first traffic light to go through the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) guard gate. 3) All vehicles must stop at guard gate and show picture identification before proceeding at the direction of the secu- rity officers. A valid driver’s license is accepted. 4) Once through the gate, stay on Hwy 501 (W Jemez Road) going west until you reach the T-intersection with SR4. -
Space-Time Patterns of Late Cretaceous to Present Magmatism in New Mexico--Comparison with Andean Volcanism and Potential for Fu
NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES, BULLETIN 160, 2004 13 Spacetime patterns of Late Cretaceous to present magmatism in New Mexico—comparison with Andean volcanism and potential for future volcanism New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801Charles E. Chapin, Maureen Wilks, and William C. McIntosh Abstract Spacetime plots of more than 3000 KAr and 40Ar/39Ar radioisotopic ages of Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic volcanic and plutonic rocks are used to evaluate the evolution of magmatism in New Mexico. Several tectonomagmatic subdivisions can be seen in the data. These are: (1) Late Cretaceous to middle Eocene (75–45 Ma) magmatism occurred along and to the south of the northeasttrending Santa Rita lineament which marked the southern boundary of the wellknown Laramide magma gap; (2) following the major decrease in Farallon–North America convergence at about 45 Ma, andesitic volcanism engulfed the southwestern quarter of New Mexico to form the intermediatecomposition basal onehalf to twothirds of the Mogollon–Datil volcanic field and spread eastward into the Sierra Blanca field; (3) at 37–36 Ma, the ignimbrite “flareup” began from TransPecos Texas to central Colorado concurrently with a change in mafic volcanism and the first signs of regional extension; (4) the maximum areal extent of magmatism occurred in the Oligocene as activity spread along the nas cent Rio Grande rift and in a minor way into the four corners of the state; (5) magmatism waned